+menu-


  • Category Archives United Nations 1992-2014
  • Go Find Your Park? Is it Under United Nations Control?

    Go Find Your Park? Is it Under United Nations AGENDA 21 Control?

    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    Find Your Park – Centennial (U.S. National Park Service)

    www.nps.gov/subjects/centennial/findyourpark.htm
    National Park Service

    Go to FindYourPark.com to share your heritage. Find Your Park logo … Find Your Park is about more than just national parks! It’s about the National Park Service …

    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES. Everyone finds their park in a different place and in a different way. These stories just might inspire you to find yours.

    —————–

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/find

    There are many ways to find your park, and many places you can find it. Want to know where to start your journey? Browse by State or Search. Close. Search …

    Find A Park Experience

    IN 1995 THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE PLACED YELLOW STONE NATIONAL PARK 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND ON “THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST” (continued below)

    BELOW IS A COMPLETE LIST OF AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARKS AND SITES THAT HAVE BEEN PLACED UNDER AGENDA 21 UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL CONTROL, SIMPLY BY BEING DESIGNATED UNDER UNESCO, AS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE, MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE SITES . 

    THE LATEST ADDITION? San Antonio Missions

    IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT, THE ALAMO AND THE  MISSIONS OF SAN ANTONIO WERE ALREADY PROTECTED BY A PLETHORA OF LAWS, FEDERAL LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, TEXAS STATE LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ORDINANCES, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, AND DEED RESTRICTIONS.

    ———————
    THE SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS INCLUDING “THE ALAMO” WAS AWARDED WORLD HERITAGE STATUS FROM UNESCO ON JULY 5, 2015?

    ————————–
    THE DESIGNATIONS, ANNOUNCED SUNDAY, MARK THE FIRST TIME THAT A TEXAS SITE HAS BEEN DEEMED OF “OUTSTANDING CULTURAL OR NATURAL IMPORTANCE TO THE COMMON HERITAGE OF HUMANITY” BY UNESCO, THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION.

    IN JANUARY 2015 IN RESPONSE TO THE UNESCO NOMINATION, REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.

    ———————————
    UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION San Antonio Missions DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL.
    ————————————————————————

    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY ON FOREIGN CONTROL..

    Heritage Area Designations | Another Land Grab U.N. …

    securetherepublic.com/…/heritage-area-designations-another-land-grab-u…

    Aug 29, 2013 –Heritage Area Designations Another U.N. Agenda 21 Land GrabWorld Heritage Area Sites – are under United Nations Educational, …

    —————————————————————————

    SEPTEMBER 8, 1978. YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK AN AREA OF 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC PARK LAND BECAME A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE

    IN 1995 THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE PLACED YELLOW STONE NATIONAL PARK 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND ON “THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST”

    YELLOWSTONE’S ADDITION TO THE ENDANGERED LIST WAS PRIMARILY A RESULT OF THE CONCERN OVER THE PRIVATE LAND USE OF THE NEW WORLD MINE.

    A UNITED NATIONS “BUFFER ZONE SCHEME” WAS PROPOSED PLACING A BUFFER ZONE AROUND, OUTSIDE OF, AND BEYOND YELLOW STONE 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND…

    A UNITED NATIONS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE CREATED BUFFER ZONE DID TAKE THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, OF NORANDA, INC. CROWN BUTTE MINES BY AFTER BEING DESIGNATED AS A WORLD HERITAGE SITE.
    WOW.. BE ADVISED,  HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN 2016? IS IT ON THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST? IS YOUR PUBLIC PARK LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY IN DANGER OF BEING SUCKED IN TO AND BEING CONFISCATED BY A BUFFER ZONE OUTSIDE OF YOUR PARK?

    ———————-

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/

    A park can be many different things to many different people. Watch the … MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES … Share your story to inspire others to find theirs.

    Share Your Story …
    MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES. Everyone finds their park in a different place and in a different way. These stories just might inspire you to find yours.
    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/find

    There are many ways to find your park, and many places you can find it. Want to know where to start your journey? Browse by State or Search. Close. Search …

    Find A Park Experience?

    THE NEARLY ONE MILLION ACRES OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
    HUGE SWATHS OF WORLD HERITAGE UN AGENDA 21, UNESCO BUFFER ZONES FOR TAKING PRIVATE PROPERTY HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AROUND AND IN ADDITION TO THE NEARLY ONE MILLION ACRES OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
    IS YOUR AMERICAN NATIONAL PARK PUBLIC LAND AND ADDITIONAL PRIVATE LAND UNDER UNESCO GLOBAL UNITED NATIONS “WORLD HERITAGE” CONTROL?

    ———————————————————-

    Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in …

    www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/olympic_park.html

    Citizen Review Online features news and commentary to people who believe … Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in closing off more land and water … June 16, 2010 … This is straight out of the United Nations Agenda 21.Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in …
    www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/olympic_park.html
    Jun 16, 2010 – This is not surprising, since the Olympic National Park holds two UN … Interestingly, THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA IS LOCATED RIGHT WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE of this biosphere … In addition to the proposed enlargement of the Olympic National Park, … tens of thousands of acres around Lake Ozette, Richmond reported.
    ——————————————————————————–
    BUFFER ZONES? MORE LIKE THE NEW WORLD ORDER OF TH UN AGENDA 21?

    [PDF]Yellowstone National Park v. the New World Mine – Berkeley …

    scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539…elq
    by P Dykstra – ‎1997 – ‎Cited by 17 – ‎Related articles

    contact jcera@law.berkeley.edu. Recommended Citation. Peter Dykstra, Defining the Mother Lode: Yellowstone National Park v. the New World Mine, …
    BUFFER ZONES: A Method To Defend Yellowstone from the New W orld M ine … In 1872, the creation of Yellowstone National Park (hereinafter. Yellowstone, or the …
    BUFFER ZONES: The authors of this definition emphasized that the first priority was the protected area, and the interests of the local citizens should be secondary.

    Part II proposes A BUFFER ZONE management scheme to help protect Yellowstone.
    Part III examines how buffer zones might be implemented near Yellowstone under existing law.

    Part IV discusses THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION AND YELLOWSTONE’S STATUS ASA WORLD HERITAGE SITE IN DANGER as an incentive for buffer zone protection.

    A GLOBAL BUFFER ZONE ONBOTH PUBLIC PAK LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY Noranda, Inc. Crown Butte Mines? Along with President Clinton, members of both Houses of Congress spoke out against the New World Mine.

    Find Your Park – Centennial (U.S. National Park Service)
    www.nps.gov/subjects/centennial/findyourpark.htm
    National Park Service
    The National Park Service invites you to find your park! In celebration of the 100th birthday of the National Park Service in 2016, we are launching a movement to …
    IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING
    SINCE THE BEGINNING 1872, AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARK LANDS WERE ENACTED AND CREATED FOR THE USE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF WE THE PEOPLE. OUR NATIONAL PARKS LANDS ARE OUR AMERICAN HERITAGE.
    1872 Yellowstone National Park By the Act of March 1, 1872, Congress established Yellowstone National Park in the Territories of Montana and Wyoming “AS A PUBLIC PARK OR PLEASURING-GROUND FOR THE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PEOPLE” and national parks can be created only through such acts.
    100 YEARS LATER AFTER, DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.
    ———————————————————————————-
    100 YEARS LATER….SINCE 1972 CONTINUING IN 2016
    AMERICA’S PROMISED LANDS HAVE BEEN GIVEN, BY THE US GOVERNMENT, TO THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNITED NATIONS
    BY FAR THE WORST GOVERNMENT TAKING OF AMERICAN’S PROMISED PUBLIC LAND IS, AND CONTINUES TO BE, TO AND FOR THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL UNESCO, AGENDA 21, WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SINCE 1972
    BY HOOK OR BY CROOK, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AT EVERY LEVEL, HAS CONTINUED TO TAKE AMERICAN’S DESIGNATED PUBLIC LAND RIGHTS AWAY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
    IN SPITE OF…
    Behind My Back | The ENABLING ACT February 22, 1889
    www.behindmyback.org/2014/03/…/the-enabling-act-february-22-1889/
    Mar 9, 2014 – Way back then, the Federal Government and the elected representative gave to and enabled American citizens, they made donations of public …
    Moving forward 125 years, “We the People” of Washington State, are in a battle with the Federal and state Governments and our elected representative struggling to preserve, protect, maintain the use of, intent and purpose of the public lands that were given to us in TRUST.
    —————————————————————————————-
    DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.

    The Bundy Family and Armed Resistance to ‘Government …
    www.breitbart.com/…/the-bundy-family-and-armed-resistance-t…
    Breitbart
    Jan 3, 2016 – Bundy Standoff in Nevada … BUNKERVILLE, NEVADA—The Bundy Ranch roundup has …. The Bundy ranch has filled that role for many.
    THE TAKEOVER AT MALHEUR WAS THE LATEST FLARE-UP IN THE SO-CALLED SAGEBRUSH REBELLION, A DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.
    ——————————————————————————————
    THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, REQUESTING, FUNDING, ALLOWING AND GIVING OUR AMERICAN NATIONAL PARKS AND OTHER AMERICAN HERITAGE SITES TO THE UNITED NATIONS, FOR THE UNITED NATION WORLD HERITAGE SITES, FOR THE UNITED NATIONS MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE, PUTTING OUR AMERICAN HERITAGE PUBLIC LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNESCO.
    —————————————————————————————
    WOW, AND EXACTLY WHO IS FUNDING THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HERITAGE SITES?
    Most of its income from COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS from countries
    INDEED, THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS IS LEGISLATING AND AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING FOR THE COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HERITAGE SITES
    MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY PAYING FOR COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATION UNESCO, FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR A RULE; OBLIGATORY. INVOLVING OR EXERCISING COMPULSION; COERCIVE.
    ——————————————————————————–
    THE CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF WORLD HERITAGE SITES wouldn’t be possible without the financial resources to meet World Heritage needs. Sources of income include the World Heritage Fund, WHICH RECEIVES MOST OF ITS INCOME FROM COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM COUNTRIES (States Parties) and from voluntary contributions. Other sources of income include profits derived from sales of World Heritage publications, or funds-in-trust that are donated by countries for specific purposes.
    ——————————————————————————-
    AMERICA’S WORLD HERITAGE SITES UNDER THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNITED NATIONS UNESCO
    DESIGNATED U.S. WORLD HERITAGE SITES BY THE UNITED NATIONS, JOINING OTHER KEY LANDMARKS SUCH AS THE STATUE OF LIBERTY, PHILADELPHIA’S INDEPENDENCE HALL, YELLOWSTONE AND GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARKS AND MONTICELLO, THOMAS JEFFERSON’S VIRGINIA HOME……

    THE LATEST? San Antonio Missions
    THE SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS INCLUDING “THE ALAMO” WAS AWARDED WORLD HERITAGE STATUS FROM UNESCO ON JULY 5, 2015.
    In addition to the Alamo, the newly designated “world heritage” shrines include missions at Concepción, San Jose, San Juan and Espada, all in San Antonio.
    THE DESIGNATIONS, ANNOUNCED SUNDAY, MARK THE FIRST TIME THAT A TEXAS SITE HAS BEEN DEEMED OF “OUTSTANDING CULTURAL OR NATURAL IMPORTANCE TO THE COMMON HERITAGE OF HUMANITY” BY UNESCO, THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION.

    United States of America

    ———————————————————————————–
    WORLD HERITAGE San Antonio Missions
    THE SITE ENCOMPASSES
    A GROUP OF FIVE FRONTIER MISSION COMPLEXES SITUATED ALONG A STRETCH OF THE SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASIN IN SOUTHERN TEXAS,
    AS WELL AS A RANCH LOCATED 37 KILOMETRES TO THE SOUTH.
    IT INCLUDES ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES,
    FARMLANDS, RESIDENCIES, CHURCHES AND GRANARIES,
    AS WELL AS WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS.
    ——————————————————————————-
    THE MISSIONS’ PHYSICAL REMAINS COMPRISE A RANGE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES INCLUDING FARMLANDS (LABORES), CATTLE GROUNDS (RANCHOS), RESIDENCES, CHURCHES, GRANARIES, WORKSHOPS, KILNS, WELLS, PERIMETER WALLS AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS.
    ——————————————————————————–
    THE MISSIONS OF SAN ANTONIO WERE ALREADY PROTECTED BY A PLETHORA OF LAWS, FEDERAL LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, TEXAS STATE LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ORDINANCES, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, AND DEED RESTRICTIONS.
    IN JANUARY 2015 IN RESPONSE TO THE UNESCO NOMINATION, REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.
    UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL.
    HOW STUPID DO THE UNESCO OFFICIALS THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN TEXAS ARE?
    WORD GETS AROUND IN CYBERSPACE
    AND, YOU CAN KEEP YOUR DOCTOR?
    ——————————————————————
    HOW STUPID DO WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE THINK WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE?
    2015 UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL?
    WHY EVERY AMERICAN TAXPAYING CITIZEN SHOULD OBJECT TO EVERY SQUARE INCH OF AMERICA’S PROMISED PUBLIC LAND BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS
    PERHAPS THIS WILL REFRESH OUR WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE MEMORY…
    OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK WAS GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS IN 1976
    AS A WILD UNESCO, UN WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND A U.N. MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE.
    IN 1988, CONGRESS DESIGNATED 95% OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK AS WILDERNESS. …

    —————————–

    The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/

    stop the wild olympics, agenda 21, land grabs; will devastate rural communities.
    —————————————————————–
    REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.
    WHY WOULD ANY ONE INTRODUCED LEGISLATION TO BAN ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING PUBLIC LAND BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE?
    WORD ABOUT FOREIGN GLOBAL CONTROL GETS AROUND IN CYBERSPACE
    ————————————————————————————
    THE 2016 UNESCO EDITION OF AGENDA 21, WILL FOCUS MAINLY ON ISSUES DEALING WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PARTICULARLY IN URBAN AREAS. THIS EVENT WILL GATHER MORE THAN 800 PARTICIPANTS FROM THE FIELDS OF “HERITAGE CONSERVATION”, archaeology, architecture and urban planning, engineering, social sciences, AS WELL AS FIELDS RELATED TO LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CRISIS INTERVENTION.

    THE UNESCO CONGRESS IS ORGANISED UNDER THE AEGIS OF THE ISCEAH COMMITTEE OF ICOMOS INTERNATIONAL, IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE EARTHEN ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMME (WHEAP).
    ——————————————————————————————————


  • The Promised Land Olympic National Park

    The Promised Land Olympic National Park

    Sept. 30, 1937 President Roosevelt came to Port Angeles WA
    A banner hung across the courthouse saying: “Mr. President, we children need your help. Give us our Olympic National Park.”
    President Roosevelt said “Mr. Mayor and my friends of Port Angeles,” “That sign is the appealingest appeal I have ever seen in my travels. I am inclined to think it counts more to have the children want that park than all the rest of us put together.
    “So, you boys and girls, I think you can count on my help in getting that national park, not only because we need it for us old people and you young people, but for a whole lot of young people who are going to come along in the next hundred years of America.”
    ————————————————————————-
    And, indeed as promised by President Roosevelt, The Promised Land Olympic National Park was CREATED AND enacted.

    —————————————
    An Act To establish the Olympic National Park, in the State of Washington, and for other purposes, approved June 29, 1938 (52 Stat. 1241)

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
    of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    16. Olympic National Park Establishment of park Act of June 29, 1938
    Establishment of park Act of June 29, 1938 An Act To establish the Olympic National Park, in the State of Washington, and for other purposes, approved June 29, 1938 (52 Stat. 1241)
    II. NATIONAL PARKS – OLYMPIC
    all west of the Willamette meridian,
    in Washington, are hereby reserved and withdrawn
    from settlement, occupancy, or disposal

    ——————
    UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND DEDICATED AND SET APART AS A PUBLIC PARK FOR THE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PEOPLE AND SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

    ——-

    and all lands formerly
    included in the Mount Olympus National Monument
    and not included in the above description are hereby transferred
    to and made a part of the Olympic National Forest.
    (16 U.S.c. sec. 251.)
    —————————————————————
    II. NATIONAL PARKS – OLYMPIC

    SUBJECT TO ALL LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO OTHER LANDS
    WITHIN SUCH PARK:
    Provided, That the total area of the
    said park shall not exceed eight hundred and ninety-eight
    thousand two hundred and ninety-two acres:

    ——————–
    PROVIDED FURTHER, THAT BEFORE ISSUING ANY SUCH PROCLAMATION, THE
    PRESIDENT “SHALL” CONSULT WITH THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
    WASHINGTON, THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND THE SECRETARY
    of Agriculture
    AND ADVISE THEM OF THE LANDS WHICH HE PROPOSES
    TO ADD TO SUCH PARK, AND SHALL AFFORD THEM A REASONABLE
    OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH AND COMMUNICATE TO HIM
    THEIR VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE ADDITION
    OF SUCH LANDS TO SUCH PARK.! (16 U.S.c. sec. 255.)

    ———————————–
    SEC. 3. THE INCOME OF EACH COUNTY RECEIVING MONEYS
    FROM THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST, under the Act of May
    23, 1908 (35 Stat. 260, ch. 192), as amended, shall be proportional to the total area of each county in the Olympic National Forest and the Olympic National Park combined.
    (16 U.S.c. sec. 253.)
    ———————————————————-
    SEC. 4. The administration, protection, and development
    of the Olympic National Park shall be exercised under
    the direction of the Secretary of the Interior BY THE NATIONAL
    PARK SERVICE, subject to the provisions of the Act of August
    25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled “An Act to establish a
    National Park Service, and for other purposes”, as amended.
    (16 D.S.C. sec. 254.)
    ——————————————————
    SEC. 5. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED “SHALL” AFFECT ANY VALID
    EXISTING CLAIM, LOCATION, OR ENTRY MADE UNDER THE LAND LAWS
    OF THE UNITED STATES, WHETHER FOR HOMESTEAD, MINERAL,
    RIGHT~ OF-WAY,
    OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WHATSOEVER,
    OR SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY SUCH CLAIMANT, LOCATOR,
    OR ENTRYMAN TO THE FULL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HIS LAND
    —————————————————————
    WHY I AM HAVING A PROBLEM WITH

    The 1938 Promised Land Olympic National Park

    Behind My Back | Access Denied

    www.behindmyback.org/category/access–denied/
    Dec 12, 2015 – Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. ONP ACCESS DENIED TO ALL CITIZENS – PUBLIC LAND – U.S. POPULATION 320 …

    ————————

    NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED “SHALL” AFFECT OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WHATSOEVER
    SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY SUCH CLAIMANT, LOCATOR, OR ENTRYMAN TO THE FULL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HIS LAND

    The 1938 Promised Land Olympic National Park?

    Behind My Back | Part 1 (WOW) a War on Wild?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/01/27/part1wow-a-war-on-wild/

    Jan 27, 2014 – Now is the time for many of us to speak of a War On Wild and keep … Endangered Species Act, in the Federal Register of Friday, July 1, 2011.

    ————————————————————————
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY… WHY I AM HAVING A PROBLEM WITH THIS?

    Behind My Back | NPS Connectivity 101

    Posted on October 21, 2013 2:37 pm by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment
    The designation of these World Heritage Sites was authorized by the World Heritage Convention, a treaty signed by President Richard Nixon and ratified in 1973. The World Heritage Program is carried out by UNESCO, to which the United States doesn’t even belong. President Ronald Reagan pulled us out of UNESCO because it was totally corrupt.
    The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program was created in 1970. The United States joined in 1974 when our State Department signed a memorandum of understanding (not a treaty) to put us in the Biosphere Program and pledge that the United States will adhere to the Biosphere conditions and limitations laid down by UNESCO. Paragraph 44 of the World Heritage Operational Guidelines states that “natural” Heritage Sites (as contrasted to “cultural”) can be interchanged with “core reserves” of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program. These core protected areas are planned to be surrounded by highly regulated buffer zones, all for the sake of “biodiversity.”

    ——————————
    So, the Park Service is choking off the local economy by refusing to maintain certain highways and by buying up any property available. Of course, there will be plenty available as more and more owners are denied the use of their own private property which causes businesses to shut down and the economy to slow.
    http://pages.map.com/bkpowell/unparksofflimits.html
    ——————————————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY…

    WHY WOULD ANY ONE OBJECT TO  THE PROMISED PUBLIC LAND OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS IN 1976?

    AS A WILD UNESCO, UN WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND A U.N. MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE.

    IN 1988, CONGRESS DESIGNATED 95% OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK AS WILDERNESS. …

    The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/

    stop the wild olympics, agenda 21, land grabs; will devastate rural communities.

    ————————————————————————

    WOW…. OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK LONG-RANGE Interpretive Plan
    November 2010 Plan Highlights
    During the next seven to ten years Olympic National Park interpretive services will provide visitors with opportunities to increase their understanding and appreciation for the park and its resources; to engage in educational opportunities; and to protect the park resources. To provide an active, engaging interpretive program, park staff and partners will work together focused on the following goals:

    INTERPRET ELWHA RIVER 2010-2017 RESTORATION?

    —————————————————
    OR SHALL WE THE PEOPLE

    INTERPRET ELWHA RIVER 2015-2016 DEVASTATION?

    IGNORED BY OUR WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray

    Behind My Back | Access Denied

    www.behindmyback.org/category/access–denied/
    Dec 12, 2015 – Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. ONP ACCESS DENIED TO ALL CITIZENS – PUBLIC LAND – U.S. POPULATION 320 …

    ——————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY…
    1944 OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK LONG-RANGE PLAN

    “George, I should not tell you this, but the long range plan of the National Park Service is to take the whole Olympic Peninsula over and put it in the Olympic National Park and move everyone off the Olympic Peninsula.”
    ————————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY… ON THE LOSS OF THE PROMISED  OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK PUBLIC LAND… in the step by step acquisition of private and DNR land by the National Park Service, as this is being written and during the last 21 years from 1992 to 2013.

    ————————————————————–

    Behind My Back | “Conspiracy Exposed”

    The notarized document “Conspiracy Exposed” was written on Oct. 8, 1992 by George C. Rains Sr. when he was 77 years old.
    The referenced “Conspiracy” was exposed in a conversation at Sol Duc Hot Springs between the acting Olympic National Park Superintendent Preston Macy and my father George C. Rains Sr. in 1944.
    ———————————————————————-

    If you are interested? snippets of info on UN AGENDA..

    From the beginning, biosphere reserves were conceived as addressing three
    basic needs or “concerns”:
    1. Conservation Concern -conservation of ecosystems and the genetic resources
    they contain
    2.Logistic Concern-international net work for research, monitoring, and education
    3.Development Concerns of sustainable human uses of ecosystems

    In 1988,the National Committee declined approval of U.S. participation in
    nominating a multi-site biosphere reserve in northern Minnesota and adjacent Canada

    BASED ON CONCERNS OF LOCAL CITIZENS GROUPS OVER THE IMPLICATIONS OF BIOSPHERE RESERVE DESIGNATION ON TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USES.

    Although the concerns lacked a factual basis, the Committee’s unprecedented rejection of a nomination underscored the need to enlist stakeholder participation in the biosphere reserve planning process

    ——————————————————————–

    ATTACHMENT II EXECUTIVE
    OFFICE OF TUB PRESIDENT
    OFFICE Of SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT
    AND BUDGET $$$$$
    Washington,D.C.10503
    MARCH 9,1979
    MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF “CERTAIN” DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
    SUBJECT: U.S. Participation in UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Program

    Designation of sites administered by state and local governments, nongovernmental organizations, and private institutions has increased steadily during the past decade (see Attachment IV). In 1976, all BR sites were Federal. Non-Federal participation has been the principal factor in growth of the network since 1983
    ———————————————————————–


  • Public Policy Matters

    Public Policy Matters
    page 5 “Thing That Matter”
    Everything CITIZENS Need to Know?
    ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC POLICY

    ———————————————
    It Aired on CSPAN Oct. 3, 2015 From a lecture given on Sept. 15, 2015 The lecturer at the college mentioned the education level of CITIZENS ? And, he said, There is a 17 page thing that will give them about 70% and another 12th grade level thing that will give them 90% of Everything CITIZENS Need to Know? ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE? NATIONAL SECURITY? AND PUBLIC POLICY?

    ———————————————–
    What is the point of this academic exercise? It seems to be to indoctrinate CITIZENS by using K-12 literature to establish the same positive political feedback loop around global warming that has existed between the federal government and the nation’s colleges and universities for the past two decades.

    ————————————————————————
    WHO WAS/IS THE COLLEGE LECTURER?

    RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY IN HIS NEW JOB AS DIRECTOR OF Center for Solutions TO WEATHER AND CLIMATE RISK AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
    ———————————————————————————
    HOW IGNORANT, UNINFORMED AND GULLIBLE, DOES THE HE THINK CITIZENS ARE ON CLIMATE CHANGE?
    PUBLIC POLICY? can be generally defined as a system of laws, regulatory measures, COURSES OF ACTION, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by a governmental entity or its representatives.
    ————————————————————————————-
    Now, IF THE  GULLIBILITY OF HIS PUBLIC POLICY isn’t enough to get your knickers in a knot….. keep reading…
    ———————————————————————————-
    And, In response to a question during his lecture at the college, RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY said

    “OF COURSE, THIS IS A MORAL ISSUE AND OBLIGATION”

    REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY’S PUBLIC POLICY ON GLOBAL WARMING IS PREACHING ON THE RELIGIOUS COMPONENTS?

    AND, DETERMINING THAT GLOBAL WARMING IS A MORAL ISSUE AND WHO AND HOW TO EXPLORE THE CITIZENS RELIGIOUS LOBBY?

    ——————-
    HE SAID… A HARD CORE CONSERVATIVE CAN QUOTE THE BIBLE, YOU KNOW.
    THE CATHOLIC COVENANT ON THIS ISSUE CAN TELL YOU WHAT THE POPE MEANS.
    —————————————————————————————–
    According to RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY

    What to do at your local level?

    All things considered, BASED ON A CITIZENS LEVEL OF EDUCATION, WITH YOUR DEPLOMA OF 90% OF EVERYTHING A CITIZEN NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE, NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC POLICY.

    —————————————-
    INDEED PUBLIC POLICY DEMANDS THAT YOU RUN AMOK….

    ———————————————-
    Go public GET MEDIA ATTENTION, PROTEST, PICKET, LOBBY IT AND demand it with your individual support and, of the support of LOCAL GLOBAL NGO groups AND THEIR 600 GLOBAL PARTNERS, Get going after your ELECTED officials, give them A TON OF public opinion, input, send emails, letters, attend, talk about it,. ELECTED OFFICIALS want votes, they don’t want to lose an election so they will act and legislate on a massive court of public media opinion.
    ——————————————————————-
    RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY DEFENDS CASE FOR GLOBAL WARMING IN HIS NEW JOB AS DIRECTOR OF Center for Solutions TO WEATHER AND CLIMATE RISK AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY

    ——————————————————————

    Rear Admiral David W. Titley, USN (Ret) « The Center for …

    climateandsecurity.org/advisory…/rearadmiraldavidwtitleyusnret/

    Rear Admiral David W. Titley, United States Navy (Retired) Dr. Titley is a nationally known expert in the field of climate, the Arctic, and National Security, and …
    climateandsecurity.org/advisory…/rear-admiral-david-w-titley-usn-ret/

    AND FOUNDING DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER FOR SOLUTIONS TO WEATHER AND CLIMATE RISK AT … DR. TITLEY INITIATED AND LED THE US NAVY’S TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
    —————————————————————————-

    Navy climate change expert sees opponents ignoring science

    www.timesunion.com/…/Navyclimatechangeexpertsees-…
    Times Union

    Jul 23, 2015 – Rear Admiral David Titley tours the USS Slater in Albany, N.Y. April 26, 2012, as part of the United States Navy’s 50/50 Program, an outreach ..
    Jul 23, 2015 – When he headed the Navy’s climate change task force, the group … In his new job as director of Center for Solutions to Weather and … FORMER NAVY OFFICER, RESEARCHER DEFENDS CASE FOR GLOBAL WARMING … AS THE U.S. NAVY’S FORMER TOP EXPERT ON MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE, RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAYS …
    —————————————————————————
    WHAT CITIZENS REALLY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE AND NATIONAL SECURITY
    When RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY headed the Navy’s climate change task force, the group looked at issues like RISING SEA LEVELS, which is one outcome of GLOBAL WARMING. NAVAL BASES AROUND THE WORLD WILL BE AFFECTED and planners have to be ready for it, he said.
    ———————————————————————————–
    RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAYS
    NATIONAL SECURITY IS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING AND RISING SEA LEVELS?
    AND, THAT NAVAL BASES AROUND THE WORLD WILL BE AFFECTED.
    AND, PLANNING for the rapidly melting ice in the arctic polar zone?

    ———————————————-
    NATIONAL SECURITY ON NAVAL BASES AROUND THE WORLD? THAT WILL BE AFFECTED WHEN THE ARCTIC POLAR ZONE ICE MELTS AND”THE FIFTH OCEAN” IS CREATED.
    ———————————————————————————–
    Citizens Needs to Know ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC POLICY ON THE ARCTIC ARCHIPELAGO OF SVALBARD
    Sept. 15, 2015 RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAID RUSSIA KEEPS POKING AROUND…
    ——————————————————————————-
    U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s Arctic Strategy was unveiled in Halifax in November 2013. Hagel SAID THE PENTAGON’S «ARCTIC STRATEGY» is centered upon the U.S. bolstering its military capabilities in the Arctic region with the opening of new sea lanes for natural resource «exploration»,

    ————————————————-
    U.S. DOMINANCE OVER THE ARCTIC IS SPELLED OUT IN THE PENTAGON’S NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE ARCTIC REGION, a policy that was developed under the stewardship of Daniel Y. Chiu, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy. Chiu sees THE RAPID CLIMATE CHANGE THAT IS AFFECTING THE ARCTIC FACILITATING A GREATER U.S. NAVAL AND OTHER MILITARY PRESENCE IN THE REGION.
    ———————————————————————————-
    TRUTH POLITICS AND HISTORY
    In September, 2010 A TREATY WAS MADE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND NORWAY
    Sept. 15, 2015 RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAID RUSSIA KEEPS POKING AROUND?

    —————————————
    THE SVALBARD TREATY OF 1920
    UNDER THE NATO UMBRELLA. THE SVALBARD TREATY OF 1920, ratified by 40 nations, agreed to “DEMILITARIZE” THE NORWEGIAN-OWNED ARCTIC ARCHIPELAGO OF SVALBARD.

    ————————————
    FACTS ABOUT SVALBARD ARCHIPELAGO The land mass is about 61 020 square kilometers, As much as 60 percent of the landmass is covered in ice, The sea area around the islands out to the territorial border of 12 nautical miles is about 90 700 square kilometers.
    —————————————————————————–
    THE POLITICS OF SVALBARD ARCHIPELAGO
    In September, 2010 A TREATY WAS MADE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND NORWAY
    fixing the boundary between the SVALBARD ARCHIPELAGO and the Novaya Zemlya archipelago. Increased interest in petroleum exploration in the Arctic increased interest in resolution of the dispute. The agreement takes into account the relative positions of the archipelagos, rather than being based simply on northward extension of the continental border of Norway and Russia.[81]
    —————————————————————————————
    USING THREE NATO ALLIES, all of them monarchies, Obama is trying to establish a U.S.-led condominium of the United States, Canada, Norway, and Denmark over the Arctic,

    —————————————————
    CONSPICUOUSLY LEAVING RUSSIA OUT OF THE EQUATION.

    Sept. 15, 2015 RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAID RUSSIA KEEPS POKING AROUND?
    ——————————————————————
    THE FIRST STEP OF THE OBAMA «POLAR PIVOT» HAS BEEN TO “MILITARIZE” THE ARCTIC ARCHIPELAGO OF SVALBARD
    UNDER THE NATO UMBRELLA. The Svalbard Treaty of 1920, ratified by 40 nations, agreed to “DEMILITARIZE” THE NORWEGIAN-OWNED ARCTIC ARCHIPELAGO OF SVALBARD.
    ——————————————————————
    Sept. 15, 2015 RETIRED REAR ADM. DAVID TITLEY SAID “RUSSIA KEEPS POKING AROUND”
    ————————————————————————————
    RUSSIA BELIEVES THAT NATO HAS VIOLATED THE SVALBARD TREATY of 1920 BY COVERTLY OPERATING MILITARY FUNCTIONS AT THE SVALBARD SATELLITE STATION AT NY-ÅLESUND,
    which is connected to Harstad and Andoya, Norway by the Svalbard Undersea Cable System. Andoya was the site of a Norwegian Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) array, art of the U.S. Integrated Undersea Surveillance System (IUSS) that acoustically tracked Soviet and Russian submarines. There is a belief that the Norwegians have continued to employ acoustic intelligence devices against the Russians and that Svalbard is part of the Norwegian monitoring activities, in violation of the Svalbard Treaty. The U.S. also maintains a Globus II HAVE STARE radar station in Vardo in the Norwegian Arctic, which is used to collect electronic intelligence for the U.S. National Security Agency from Russian military targets across the Norwegian border.
    ———————————————————————————-
    the bottom line on “Ice Station Obama”

    IN THE ARCTIC, THE DECISIONS ARE MADE IN WASHINGTON, WHILE THE NATO PUPPETS OF OTTAWA, COPENHAGEN, AND OSLO OBEDIENTLY WAG THEIR TAILS.

    —————————————————————–
    The unedited comment
    Ice Station Obama
    Wayne MADSEN 06.06.2014 00:00
    Although President Obama’s «pivot to Asia» is receiving media attention, his little-known push to establish American hegemony over THE RAPIDLY MELTING ARCTIC POLAR ZONE HAS GONE LARGELY UNNOTICED. Using three NATO allies, all of them monarchies, Obama is trying to establish a U.S.-led condominium of the United States, Canada, Norway, and Denmark over the Arctic,
    CONSPICUOUSLY LEAVING RUSSIA OUT OF THE EQUATION.
    Obama’s military and intelligence push into the Arctic could be taken from the pages of the 1960s Cold War thriller by Alistair MacLean, «Ice Station Zebra», WITH THE DEPLETION OF THE ARCTIC ICE PACK OPENING UP FORMERLY NON-NAVIGABLE ARCTIC MARITIME ZONES TO SHIPPING, Obama and his Wall Street handlers are eyeing the Arctic as America’s new region for natural resource exploitation. And, as always, the Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence Community are ready to act as the centurions for the investment bankers and hedge fund tycoons.
    U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s Arctic Strategy was unveiled in Halifax in November 2013. Hagel said the Pentagon’s «Arctic Strategy» is centered upon the U.S. bolstering its military capabilities in the Arctic region with the opening of new sea lanes for natural resource «exploration»,
    THE FIRST STEP OF THE OBAMA «POLAR PIVOT» HAS BEEN TO MILITARIZE IT UNDER THE NATO UMBRELLA. The Svalbard Treaty of 1920, ratified by 40 nations, agreed to demilitarize the Norwegian-owned Arctic archipelago of Svalbard and to permit commercial activities on the islands by the signatories. Only Norway and Russia (and the former Soviet Union) exercised the right to commercially exploit the resources of the islands, mainly by mining coal. Russia has largely withdrawn its commercial interests from the islands with only some 370 Russians and Ukrainians remaining in Svalbard, many of them living at the mining community in Barentsburg, the Russian research station at Ny-Ålesund, and the small mining outpost at Sveagruva.
    A dependency of Norway, Svalbard has seen its Norwegian population grow with many of the Norwegians living in the capital of Longyearbyen. As signatories of the Svalbard Treaty, Americans, Canadians, and Britons are free to travel and reside on Svalbard without restrictions imposed by Norwegian authorities. Americans first started to arrive in Svalbard as part of the team that oversees the operation of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, a project of Global Crop Diversity Trust, which stores most of the world’s crop and botanical varieties in an underground vault.
    Russia believes that NATO has violated the Svalbard Treaty by covertly operating military functions at the Svalbard Satellite Station at Ny-Ålesund, which is connected to Harstad and Andoya, Norway by the Svalbard Undersea Cable System. Andoya was the site of a Norwegian Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) array, art of the U.S. Integrated Undersea Surveillance System (IUSS) that acoustically tracked Soviet and Russian submarines. There is a belief that the Norwegians have continued to employ acoustic intelligence devices against the Russians and that Svalbard is part of the Norwegian monitoring activities, in violation of the Svalbard Treaty. The U.S. also maintains a Globus II HAVE STARE radar station in Vardo in the Norwegian Arctic, which is used to collect electronic intelligence for the U.S. National Security Agency from Russian military targets across the Norwegian border.
    THE MUSHROOM-LIKE RADOME THAT CONCEALS THE HAVE STARE RADAR IS A TELL-TALE SIGN OF A U.S. MILITARY-INTELLIGENCE PRESENCE.
    RADOMES HAVE APPEARED IN INCREASING NUMBERS FROM THE NATIONAL SECURITY BASE AT MENWITH HILL, ENGLAND to northern Norway, Svalbard, Greenland, Iceland, the Faeroes, northern Canada, and even remote and uninhabited Jan Mayen Island in the Norwegian Sea.
    ———————————————————————————–
    my comment
    And, MUSHROOM-LIKE RADOMES HAVE APPEARED IN INCREASING NUMBERS, even in remote areas of the Olympic Peninsula in WA STATE U.S.A ….
    ————————————————————–
    Complementing America’s operations in Svalbard and Norway is the increasing use by NATO of Sweden’s Arctic Lapland for military purposes. Most NATO activities in Sweden involve NEAT, which stands for NATO Exercises and Advanced Testing.
    The U.S. is also expanding its military presence at the Thule airbase in Greenland as part of the U.S. Air Force 21st Space Wing’s missile defense network. Thule provides missile launch sensor data to the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) and the Air Force Space Command. A number of Greenland «home rule» governments have wanted the United States to withdraw its military forces from Greenland but Washington and Denmark, which remains the sovereign authority over Greenland through the contrivance of calling Greenland a self-governing country within the «Kingdom of Denmark,» have rejected Greenlandic calls for the demilitarization of Greenland. The «kingdom» contrivance has also been used to keep the independence-minded Faeroe Islands in the Norwegian Sea firmly under Denmark’s, and by default, NATO’s, control. The Faeroes and Greenland are part of Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command, which in turn reports to NATO.
    Although Greenland’s Prime Minister Aleqa Hammond of the social democratic Siumut Party favors independence, she, like other past leaders, face determined opposition from Washington and Copenhagen, where NATO lobbyists exercise final say. Hammond stated «We will stand up as a people and demand what is rightfully ours.» According to a document found in the CIA archives, The U.S. has always believed it has ultimate authority over Greenland. And Denmark has not always been such an obedient slave to the dictates of Washington. A formerly TOP SECRET CIA document, dated January 31, 1947, states that the U.S. Minister to Denmark, Josiah P. Marvel, Jr., raised the issue of Greenland with the Danish Foreign Minister, Gustav Rasmussen. The U.S., at the time, was interested in wresting control of Greenland from Denmark to use it as a military base against the Soviet Union. When Marvel insisted on discussing the future of Greenland with Rasmussen, the Danish Foreign Minister replied, «While we owe much to America, I do not feel we owe them the whole island of Greenland.»
    What a difference a generation makes. Former Danish Prime Minister and outgoing NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, nicknamed the «Fogh of War» by his many critics, handed Greenland to the United States on a Georg Jensen silver platter and warned the Faeroes not to even think about independence. Whatever the Americans paid for Rasmussen’s knee-jerk loyalty, it was worth it to Washington.
    U.S. dominance over the Arctic is spelled out in the Pentagon’s National Strategy for the Arctic Region, a policy that was developed under the stewardship of Daniel Y. Chiu, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy. Chiu sees the rapid climate change that is affecting the Arctic facilitating a greater U.S. naval and other military presence in the region.
    Last February, U.S. forces participated in the first airborne operation north of the Arctic Circle. The exercise, codenamed SPARTAN PEGASUS, saw paratroopers from the Army’s 25th Infantry Division parachute into Deadhorse on Alaska’s North Slope.
    In 2012, the commander of the U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) and NORAD signed the Tri-Command Framework for Arctic Cooperation with the Commander of Canadian Joint Operations Command. The agreement «enhances military cooperation to support safety, security and defense operations in the region.» NORTHCOM has assumed sole responsibility for military operations in the Arctic region, placing Greenland, Svalbard, Jan Mayen Island, and the North Pole within NORTHCOM’s jurisdictional domain.
    And NORTHCOM has not been shy about ORDERING U.S. FIGHTER PLANES TO ENGAGE RUSSIAN MILITARY AIRCRAFT in dangerous «cat-and-mouse» games over the Bering Sea between Siberia and Alaska.
    NORTHCOM has increased its presence in Canada’s first Inuit-ruled territory, Nunavut. In March, NORTHCOM conducted Exercise ARCTIC WARRIOR/GUERRIER NORDIQUE in Iqaluit, Nunavut. The Stephen Harper government in Ottawa has increasingly stymied the rights of Native Canadians over the natural resources on their lands. The presence of NORTHCOM military units in the Nunavut capital of Iqaluit last March was a message by Ottawa and Washington to the local leaders that their self-government has «limits,» just like those imposed by Washington and Copenhagen on their Inuit cousins in Greenland. The same restrictions by the neo-colonialists of Ottawa and Washington will be imposed on the emerging Deline Gotine nation, the first native Canadian self-governing entity in Canada’s Northwest Territories. In addition, the people of Deline Gotine will have no authority to ban natural gas fracking in their territory.
    NATO has urged Denmark and Canada to resolve a dispute over ownership of Hans Island, a 1.3 kilometer barren uninhabited island between Greenland and Canada’s Ellesmere Island. The island will be ruled as a shared condominium between Canada and Denmark. Left out of the agreement are Greenland and Nunavut, the two Inuit governments that actually would have had no problems resolving sovereignty issues between the same native people. HOWEVER, IN THE ARCTIC, THE DECISIONS ARE MADE IN WASHINGTON, WHILE THE NATO PUPPETS OF OTTAWA, COPENHAGEN, AND OSLO OBEDIENTLY WAG THEIR TAILS.

    —————————————————————————————


  • Pearl Revere China may end up owning the USA

    Pearl Revere China’s  going to end up owning the USA?

    We’ve all have heard stories about how the US government is using our Public American land, AKA natural resources as collateral, as security, for our foreign debts.  

    People joke about it.

    “China’s going to end up owning the USA” if we don’t pay our TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT TO THEM.

    This is definitely NOT A GOOD THING…..COLLATERAL by definition,  property or goods used as security against a loan and forfeited if the loan is not repaid.

    DEBT-EQUITY swaps involve the conversion of external debt (national debt which is owed to foreign investors) INTO SOME TYPE OF EQUITY.  Foreigners continue to hold a claim on the debtor nation’s resources.

    Those are THE DYNAMICS OF THE GLOBAL DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP

    In 1987 the first ever GLOBAL Debt-Nature swap took place between an America NGO, a commercial American Bank and Bolivia. (read more below)

    ————————————————————

    AMERICA’S NATIONAL  RESOURCES, OUR COUNTRIES PUBLIC LAND AND WATER USED AS COLLATERAL FOR FOREIGN DEBT- EQUITY?

    HOW MUCH OF  AMERICAN’S PUBLIC NATIONAL RESOURCES, LAND AND CLEAN WATER HAS ALREADY BEEN PUT UP AND USED UP AS COLLATERAL TO  FOREIGN COUNTRIES, TO HOLD A CLAIM ON  THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ?

    ———————————————————————–

    D.C. Forgets about the Debt

    THE NATIONAL DEBT? is expected to top $17.6 trillion by August 1, 2014, the national debt has dropped out of the headlines recently. OUT OF SIGHT MAY INDEED MEAN OUT OF MIND, especially in Washington, but that hardly means the problem has gone away.

    OK? LET’S JUST  FORGET, THE NATIONAL DEBT AND THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE  BY USING AMERICAS PUBLIC NATURAL RESOURCES AS SECURITY FOR FOREIGN LOAN’S

    NO PROBLEM FOR WA DC… WHATS THE BIG DEAL?

    THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR  KNOWS THAT AMERICA’S GOT HUNDREDS OF TRILLIONS  OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLICLY OWED NATURAL RESOURCES, WILD LAND, FOREST LAND, CLEAN WATER, OIL, COAL  TO SWAP FOR EQUITY AND TO PUT UP FOR COLLATERAL.

    WHAT THE HELL, COLLATERAL by definition,  IS ONLY property or goods used as security against a loan and forfeited if the loan is not repaid

    ———————————————————————————

    IT’S LONG AND IT’S  COMPLICATE UNITED NATIONS PROTOCOL  DISASTER JUST WAITING TO HAPPEN, IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO “WE THE PEOPLE”.

    To EVEN BEGIN to understand the implications of 1987 GLOBAL Debt-Nature swap on the United State of America.

    YOU BETTER “BONE UP” ON  THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED NATIONS

    1. The 1992 United Nations Rio Earth Summit

    ————————————————–

    2. April 1995, the United Nations Convention’s ‘‘Conference of the Parties’’ adopted the so-called ‘‘Berlin Mandate’’

    ————————————————-

    3. July 1996 the Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs called for the first time FOR ‘‘LEGALLY BINDING’’ (GLOBAL WARMING TREATY) EMISSION LIMITATIONS ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    —————————————————-

    4. January 8, 1997 testimony of Secretary of State, given before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate

    —————————————————————————

    5.  JUL 25, 1997 THE  US SENATE BYRD-HAGEL RESOLUTION (full text below)

    WHY DID THE UNITED STATES NOT BECOME A PARTY TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

     The Senate’s 1997 ByrdHagel Resolution warned the Clinton Administration (several months in advance) NOT TO ENTER INTO ANY GLOBAL WARMING TREATY.

     THE BYRDHAGEL RESOLUTION  was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997.

    ———————————————————————

    6.  December 11, 1997 UNITED NATIONS KYOTO PROTOCOL

    THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL WARMING TREATY.

    CLINTON administration VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE was a main participant in putting THE KYOTO PROTOCOL together in 1997.

    PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON SIGNED THE KYOTO PROTOCOL AGREEMENT IN 1997

    ——————————————————————————————-

    This is a RED FLAG WARNING on THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL WARMING TREATY

    ——————————————————————————————————————–

    Back to THE GLOBAL DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP

    In order to facilitate THE GLOBAL DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP, DEBT-EQUITY SWAPS a dollar amount must be assigned for the value of NATURE?

    HISTORICALLY LAND HAD JUST A  REAL PROPERTY $$$ VALUE (we were taxed on the  assessed value)

    OK SO NOW, We have then NGO  ECO FREAKS (not the COUNTY assessor)  PAID WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS TO run around and CONJURE  up the NEWLY ENHANCED ADDED ecosystem service valuations (ENVRIONMENTAL)  and the GLOBAL $$$ VALUE of NATURE?

    They claim? “These appraisal values are based on scientific data and are applicable to

    decision-making at every jurisdictional level”

    —————————————————————–

    THE DYNAMICS OF THE DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP ( supporter)

    In 1987 the first ever Debt-Nature swap took place between America and Bolivia.

    AN AMERICAN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION purchased USD650,000 worth of Bolivia’s foreign debt.  FOR A DISCOUNTED PRICE OF USD100,000, THE ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION BUYS THE NATION’S DEBT FROM A COMMERCIAL BANK.

    THE DEBT IS SWAPPED FOR “CONSERVATION PAYMENTS-IN-KIND” (2) EQUIVALENT TO THE FACE VALUE OF THE LOAN – USD650,000.

    ———————————————————————————–

    REALLY? IN-KIND OF PAYMENTS? OF USD550,000?

    FOR A DISCOUNTED PRICE OF USD100,000 AN AMERICAN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION (NGO) GOT A USD550,000  “CONSERVATION PAYMENTS-IN-KIND”

    THE DEBT IS SWAPPED FOR?

    WHO? PAID THE PAYMENTS-IN-KIND OF USD550,000 TO THE COMMERCIAL  BANK?

    ———————————————————————————————

    In May 1992, the United States Senate gave its advise and

    consent to the ratification of the United Nations Framework

    Convention on Climate Change. The treaty, which was intended to

    address the global emission of greenhouse gases, WAS SIGNED BY

    PRESIDENT BUSH AT THE RIO EARTH SUMMIT.

    ———————————————————————————————— 

    FROM supporters of  THE KYOTO PROTOCOL

     Public awareness and support of this initiative is the only thing that will shift votes within the U.S. Congress and make Kyoto a global reality.

    Despite the hopefulness of this plan, several obstacles still block immediate progress.  THE GREATEST OF THESE BLOCKS IN THE U.S. REFUSAL TO RATIFY.  The agreement would require a 6% decrease in overall U.S. emissions.  Economics concerns are central to this political “unmomentum”.  The recent BYRD-HAGEL RESOLUTION ensured the that Congress would not pass THE KYOTO PROTOCOL if it proves to be too expensive or if developing countries do not commit.  According to past performance it seems probably that Kyoto will not pass.

    ———————————————————————————–

    My red flag warning

    THE BYRD-HAGEL RESOLUTION (complete text below) SAVED US ONCE AND ENSURED THE THAT CONGRESS WOULD NOT PASS THE KYOTO PROTOCOL

    ——————————————————————————————–

    The dynamics of THE DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP may lead to skepticism on both sides of the issue.  Although a non-governmental environmental agency owns the land, typically there is no system established to monitor the future security of the national forest reserves.

     WITHIN THESE NATIONS OF UNSTABLE ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL CONDITIONS there is no guarantee that the agreement made by one administration will transfer to the successor.

    —————————————————————————————–

    My red flag warning

    THIS KYOTO PROTOCOL IS LONG AND COMPLICATED, A UNITED NATIONS DISASTER PROGRAM, JUST SITTING AROUND IN WA DC, WAITING TO BE RATIFIED WHEN VOTES SHIFT WITHIN THE U.S. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    YOUR  VOTE IN 2014 MAY BE THE ONLY THING THAT WILL SHIFT VOTES WITHIN THE U.S. CONGRESS TO PREVENT THE KYOTO PROTOCOL FROM BECOMING  AN  AMERICAN  REALITY.

    —————————————————————————————————–

    Keep reading if you are concerned

    OK… So what was the Byrd-Hagle?

    That Byrd–Hagel was passed by the US Senate several months before the Kyoto meeting makes this outcome all the more puzzling. Indeed, Cutajar (2004: 63) terms it ‘something of a mystery’.

    ————————————————————————

     

    S. RES. 98

    www.gpo.gov/…/BILLS-105sr…

    United States Government Printing Office

    Jul 25, 1997 – Mr. BYRD (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. INOUYE, … submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the ..

    ————————————————————————-

    THE BYRD- HAGLE RESOLUTION

    105TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION

    S. RES. 98

    [Report No. 105–54]

    Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the conditions for the United

    States becoming a signatory to any international agreement on green-

    house gas emissions under the United Nations Framework Convention

    on Climate Change

     

    RESOLUTION

    Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

    Whereas the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Convention’’), adopted in May 1992, entered into force in 1994 and is not yet fully implemented;

    Whereas the Convention, intended to address climate change on a global basis, identifies the former Soviet Union and the countries of Eastern Europe and the OrganizationFor Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), including the United States, as ‘‘Annex I Parties’’, and the remaining 129 countries, including China, Mexico, India, Brazil, and South Korea, as ‘‘Developing Country Parties’’;

    Whereas in April 1995, the Convention’s ‘‘Conference of the Parties’’ adopted the so-called ‘‘Berlin Mandate’’;

    Whereas the ‘‘Berlin Mandate’’ calls for the adoption, as soon as December 1997, in Kyoto, Japan, of a protocol or another legal instrument that strengthens commitments to limit greenhouse gas emissions by Annex I Parties for the post-2000 period and establishes a negotiation process called the ‘‘Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate’’;

    Whereas the ‘‘Berlin Mandate’’ specifically exempts all Developing Country Parties from any new commitments in such negotiation process for the post-2000 period

    Whereas although the Convention, approved by the United States Senate, called on all signatory parties to adopt policies and programs aimed at limiting their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, in July 1996 the Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs called for the first time for ‘‘legally binding’’ emission limitation targets and time tables for Annex I Parties, a position reiterated by the Secretary of State in testimony before the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate on January 8, 1997;

    Whereas greenhouse gas emissions of Developing Country Parties are rapidly increasing and are expected to surpass emissions of the United States and other OECD countries as early as 2015;

    Whereas the Department of State has declared that it is critical for the Parties to the Convention to include Developing Country Parties in the next steps for global action and, therefore, has proposed that consideration of additional steps to include limitations on Developing Country Parties’ greenhouse gas emissions would not begin until after a protocol or other legal instrument is adopted in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997;

    Whereas the exemption for Developing Country Parties is inconsistent with the need for global action on climate change and is environmentally flawed;

    Whereas the Senate strongly believes that the proposals under negotiation, because of the disparity of treatment between Annex I Parties and Developing Countries and the level of required emission reductions, could result in serious harm to the United States economy, including significant job loss, trade disadvantages, increased energy and consumer costs, or any combination thereof; and

    Whereas it is desirable that a bipartisan group of Senators be appointed by the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate for the purpose of monitoring the status of negotiations on Global Climate Change and reporting periodically to the Senate on those negotiations:

    Now, therefore, be it Resolved,

    That it is the sense of the Senate that

    (1) the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol to, or other agreement regarding, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, at negotiations in Kyoto in December 1997  or thereafter, which would—

    (A) mandate new commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for the Annex

    I Parties, unless the protocol or other agreement also mandates new specific scheduled commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for Developing Country Parties with- in the same compliance period, or

    (B) would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States; and any such protocol or other agreement which  would require the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification should be accompanied by a detailed explanation of any legislation or regulatory actions that may be required to implement the protocol or  other agreement and should also be accompanied by 5 SRES 98 ATS an analysis of the detailed financial costs and other  impacts on the economy of the United States which would be incurred by the implementation of the protocol or other agreement.

    SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit  a copy of this resolution to the President

     THE BYRDHAGEL RESOLUTION  was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    The Senate’s 1997 ByrdHagel Resolution warned the Clinton Administration (several months in advance) NOT TO ENTER INTO ANY GLOBAL WARMING TREATY.

    —————————————————————————————————————–

    CLINTON administration VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE was a main participant in putting THE KYOTO PROTOCOL together in 1997.

    PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON SIGNED THE KYOTO PROTOCOL AGREEMENT IN 1997,

    BYRD-HAGEL PREVENTED CLINTON FROM EVEN TRYING TO RATIFY THE KYOTO PROTOCOL, which also would have put the U.S.  economy at an economic disadvantage to CHINA AND INDIA.

     

    ————————————————————————————–

    THE KYOTO PROTOCOL was drawn up on 11 December 1997 as an implementary measure to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change signed on 9 May 1992 in Rio that set up binding obligations

    THE KYOTO PROTOCOL is an international agreement created under the UNITED NATIONS Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Kyoto, Japan in …

    —————————————————————————————————

    AND THEN THERE IS THIS…. ( snippets of a  22 page report)

    Clinton and Al Gore’s mess on climate change etc

    WHY DID THE UNITED STATES NOT BECOME A PARTY TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

     http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/sprinz/doc/Hovi.2012.WhytheUnitedStatesDidNotBecomeaPartytotheKyotoProtocol.EJIR.pdf

    ——————————————————————————–

     My comment, thank God!

    THE BYRDHAGEL RESOLUTION  was a United States Senate Resolution passed unanimously with a vote of 95–0 on 25 July 1997.

    ————————————————————————–

    A seemingly obvious answer is that Kyoto’s design gave it practically no chance of US

    Senate ratification.

    In addition to the requirement of 67 votes to ratify international treaties, the US

    Congress must pass enabling legislation to ensure fulfillment of a treaty’s objectives.

    Because of supermajority procedures in the Senate, such as the filibuster, significant

    policy shifts often require a three-fifths majority (60 votes) to pass.

    Consequently, votes on enabling legislation potentially face a supermajority hurdle that centrally placed veto players can exploit.

    During the Kyoto negotiations, it was reasonably clear that the climate-change issue caused conflicting positions in the Senate not only because of partisan  politics, but also because of deep regional differences.

    ———————————————————

    WHY DID THE UNITED STATES NOT BECOME A PARTY TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

    ( snippets of a  22 page report supporting)

    Clinton and Al Gore’s mess on climate change etc.

    To be continued…..

    —————————————————————————————–

    if you are interested in the complete text of

    WHY DID THE UNITED STATES NOT BECOME A PARTY TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

    Google it.

    —————————————

    WHAT IS “DEBT-for-NATURE” SWAPPING?

    Google Market-based conservation strategies (for the complete text)

     By Eric Thomas Marshall