+menu-


  • Category Archives Oath To Defend The US Constitution
  • The SES Government of 7000 Strangers?

    The SES Government of 7000 Strangers?

    I am directing all questions,  to elected SENATORS JOHNSON, MCCAIN, PORTMAN, LANKFORD, ERNST, SASSE, CARPER, MCCASKILL, BALDWIN, HEITKAMP, AND PETERS PRESENT.

     As members of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) Committee 

    THE 7000 SENIOR EXECUTIVE CAREER  OPERATIVES IN THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) ARE NOT STRANGERS TO YOU.

    As Required by Public Law No: 114-136 (03/18/2016)

    THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL AND MANAGEMENT (OPM) TO REPORT THE NUMBER, NAMES, TITLES, AND PAY OF ALL POLITICAL APPOINTEES WHO HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO CAREER POSITIONS (SES) TO THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT & GOVERNMENT REFORM (OGR) AND THE HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (HSGAC) ON A QUARTERLY BASIS.

    ————————————————————————

    YOU THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN THE U.S.GOVERNMENT, KNOW EXACTLY WHO THEY ARE, AND YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY DO.

    A government of strangers: Executive politics in Washington

    H Heclo – 2011 – books.google.com

    HOW DO POLITICAL APPOINTEES TRY TO GAIN CONTROL OF THE WASHINGTON BUREAUCRACY?

     HOW DO HIGH-RANKING CAREER BUREAUCRATS TRY TO ENSURE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUITY?

    THE ANSWERS ARE SOUGHT IN THIS ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS BETWEEN APPOINTEES AND BUREAUCRATS that uses the participants’ own words to describe the imperatives they face and the strategies they adopt.


    SHIFTING ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE WELL-PUBLICIZED ACTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT
    , High Heclo

    Cited by 981 Related articles All 2 versions Cite Save More

    ——————————————————————————

    FEB 14, 2017 WHO’S LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, THAT THREATENS NATIONAL SECURITY? SHIFTING ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE WELL-PUBLICIZED ACTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT?

    —————————————————————–

    Feb. 15, 2017 WIKILEAKED “AMAZING BATTLE FOR DOMINANCE IS PLAYING OUT BETWEEN THE ELECTED US GOVT & THE IC WHO CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE THE ‘PERMANENT GOVERNMENT’,” ASSANGE WROTE.

    —————————————————————————

    WHAT A MESS…

    THE ELECTED US GOVERNMENT, PRESIDENT TRUMP, MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE,

    THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC),THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS (HSGAC)  &

    THE IC WHO CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE THE ‘PERMANENT GOVERNMENT’

    ———————————————————————————–

    I do investigating reporting on my website.

    Concerned American Citizens send me tips, I received one the first week in Nov 2016, about a FOURTH SECRET POWER EMBEDDED in the US Government.

    WHAT THE HELL IS THE FOURTH SECRET POWER IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?

    In the U.S. Constitution there are only THREE  separate powers of Government

    ONE IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE EMBODIED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IS SEPARATION OF POWERS. … EACH OF THE THREE GOVERNMENTAL BRANCHES, LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL, “CHECKS” THE POWERS OF THE OTHER BRANCHES TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PRINCIPAL POWERS OF THE GOVERNMENT ARE NOT CONCENTRATED IN THE HANDS OF ANY SINGLE BRANCH.

    I’ve spent hundreds of hours researching, reading, documenting and critically thinking (connecting the dots) and there is only one fourth secret power embedded in the US Government, that fits the criteria.

    ARE THE 7000 (SES) SENIOR CAREER UNTOUCHABLE  EXECUTIVES IN CIVIL SERVICE, TRAINED AND PROVIDED BY (SES) THAT OPERATES AND OVERSEE NEARLY EVERY GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY IN APPROXIMATELY 75 FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    Senior Executive Service – OPM

    https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/seniorexecutiveservice/

    The Senior Executive Service (SES) lead America’s workforce. … SES MEMBERS ARE THE MAJOR LINK BETWEEN THESE APPOINTEES and the rest of the Federal workforce. THEY OPERATE AND OVERSEE NEARLY EVERY GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY IN APPROXIMATELY 75 FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    HOW POWERFUL ARE THE SES CAREER EXECUTIVE?

    THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) IS A CORPS OF MEN AND WOMEN WHO ADMINISTER PUBLIC PROGRAMS

     AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT..

    SES LEVEL V – O-7 – BRIGADIER GENERAL

     

    Civilian to Military Rank – FederalPay

    https://www.federalpay.org/article/civilian-to-military-rank

     

    Equivalent Civilian to Military Ranks

    Civilian Grade Military Rank

    Army Title

    GS-13

    O-4

    Major

    GS-14

    O-5

    Lieutenant Colonel

    GS-15

    O-6

    Colonel

    SES LEVEL V

    O-7

    BRIGADIER GENERAL

    ——————————————————————————————

    HOW DO HIGH-RANKING CAREER BUREAUCRATS TRY TO ENSURE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUITY?

    Obama signs “Ted Kaufman’s” Transition Act – The News Journal

    www.delawareonline.com/story/opinion/…/obamasigns-ted…transition…/82255556/

    MAR 25, 2016 – A BILL SIGNED MARCH 18, BY PRESIDENT OBAMA bears the name of a Delawarean, Ted Kaufman. The “Edward ‘Ted’ Kaufman and Michael Leavitt

     PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITIONS ... President Obama’s handoff to his successor will be much smoother. … In a rare bipartisan moment it passed the Senate unanimously

    Presidential Transitions Improvements Act of 2015.”\17\

    (Sec. 2) This bill amends the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 to direct the President to plan and coordinate activities to facilitate an efficient transfer of power to a successor President, including by: (1) not later than six months before a presidential election, establishing and operating a White House transition coordinating council; and (2) establishing and operating an agency transition directors council.

    To ENSURE that agencies plan adequately for transitions, this section also requires that not later than six months before Election Day, the head of each agency

    —————————————————————————

    Just asking? TO ENSURE IN APPROXIMATELY 75 FEDERAL AGENCIES?

     ————————————————————————

    SHALL DESIGNATE A SENIOR CAREER EMPLOYEE of each major component and subcomponent of the agency to overseetransition activities.  Also, not later than September 15 of a presidential election year, for each critical non-career position in an agency,

    the head of the agency SHALL DESIGNATE A QUALIFIED CAREER EMPLOYEE to serve in an acting capacity during the transition. THIS SECTION ALSO REQUIRES, to the greatest extent practicable, the negotiation of memorandums of understanding between the incumbent administration (acting through the Federal Transition Coordinator) and the transition teams of major candidates, not later than November 1 of a presidential election year. To the greatest extent practicable, the memorandums of understanding SHALL BE BASED on those from past transitions.

    (Sec. 4) This section directs the Office of Personnel Management to submit

     TO SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES ANNUAL REPORTS ON REQUESTS BY AGENCIES TO APPOINT POLITICAL APPOINTEES OR FORMER POLITICAL APPOINTEES TO NONPOLITICAL CIVIL SERVICE POSITIONS.

    These reports shall be submitted quarterly in the last year of a presidential term or in the last year of the second consecutive term of a President.

    (Sec. 5) This section directs the Government Accountability Office to report to specified congressional committees on final significant regulatory actions promulgated during the last 120-day period of presidential administrations ending in 2001, 2009, and 2017.

    A significant regulatory action means any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, the environment, productivity, competition, jobs, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an agency action; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs,

    OR (4) RAISE NOVEL LEGAL OR POLICY ISSUES.

    ———————————————————————————

    HOW CONSTITUTIONAL IS THE “UNCHECKED” (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF FOURTH POWER?

    IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION THERE ARE ONLY THREE  SEPARATE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT

    ONE IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE EMBODIED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IS SEPARATION OF POWERS. … EACH OF THE THREE GOVERNMENTAL BRANCHES, LEGISLATIVE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL, “CHECKS” THE POWERS OF THE OTHER BRANCHES TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PRINCIPAL POWERS OF THE GOVERNMENT ARE NOT CONCENTRATED IN THE HANDS OF ANY SINGLE BRANCH.

    ——————————————————————————————

    Just saying….THE KGB… was originally designed in March 1954  to be a state security committee and was attached to the Council of Ministers.


  • Constitutional Justice Scalia and Gorsuch?

    Constitutional Justice Scalia and Gorsuch?

    President Trump’s pick to fill Justice’s Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch shares the late justice’s commitment to statutory text and the original public meaning of the Constitution.

    JUDGE GORSUCH’S RECORD ON THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 10TH CIRCUIT SHOWS THAT HE WILL DEFEND “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS.

    “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS IS WELL DOCUMENTED IN “THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION”

    ————————————————————————
    Documents from the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention, 1774-1789

    ——————————–
    This collection CONTAINS 277 DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE WORK OF CONGRESS AND THE DRAFTING AND RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

    It includes the essay To Form a More Perfect Union, which provides background information on the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and the call for a new Constitution. Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union…
    “Confederation include the following references in the Journals of the Continental Congress:
    • June 11, 1776 – The Continental Congress resolved “that a committee be appointed to prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between these colonies.”
    • June 12, 1776 – The committee members were appointed “to prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between these colonies.”
    • ——————————————————————————————
    JULY 4, 1776 THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE (added for emphasis)
    • ——————————————————————————
    • July 12, 1776 – The first draft of the Articles of Confederation was presented to the Continental Congress.
    • November 15, 1777 – The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation.
    • November 17, 1777 – The Articles of Confederation were submitted to the states with a request for immediate action.
    • June 25, 1778 – A committee of three was appointed to prepare the form of a ratification of the Articles of Confederation.
    • June 26, 1778 – The Articles of Confederation were ordered to be engrossed.
    • June 27, 1778 – The first engrossed copy was found to be incorrect, and a second engrossed copy was ordered.
    • July 9, 1778 – The second engrossed copy of the Articles of Confederation was signed and ratified by the delegates from eight states: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and South Carolina.
    • July 21, 1778 – North Carolina delegates signed the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.
    • July 24, 1778 – Georgia delegates signed the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.
    • November 26, 1778 – New Jersey delegates signed the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.
    • May 5, 1779 – Delaware delegates signed the ratification of the Articles of Confederation.
    • March 1, 1781 – Maryland delegates signed the ratification of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were finally ratified by all thirteen states.
    • February 21, 1787 – Congress approved a plan to hold a convention in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation.

    “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS IS WELL DOCUMENTED

    ——————————————————————

    JULY 4, 1776 THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
    ————————————————————————

    MARCH 4, 1789 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    Date effective‎: ‎MARCH 4, 1789 Ratified‎: ‎June 21, 1788

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    ————————————————————–

    September 25, 1789 THE BILL OF RIGHTS
    The first 10 amendments to the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties.

    Ratified‎: ‎DECEMBER 15, 1791
    Location‎: ‎National Archives
    Author(s)‎: ‎James Madison
    Created‎: ‎September 25, 1789
    ———————————————————

    IN 1789 “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WAS WELL DOCUMENTED IN 277 DOCUMENTS. period

    THE PRINTED EPHEMERA COLLECTION COMPRISES ” 28,000″ PRIMARY-SOURCE ITEMS DATING FROM THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY TO THE PRESENT AND ENCOMPASSES KEY EVENTS AND ERAS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
    An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera
    ————————————————————————————
    FEB 1, 2017

    UPDATING TO THE PRESENT AND ENCOMPASSES KEY EVENTS AND ERAS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
    DONALD J. TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    PRESIDENT TRUMP NOMINATED JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH, A CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE, AS HIS PICK TO REPLACE THE LATE JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

    JUDGE GORSUCH’S RECORD ON THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 10TH CIRCUIT SHOWS THAT HE WILL DEFEND “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS.

    IN 1789 “THE ORIGINAL INTENT” OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS WAS WELL DOCUMENTED IN 277 DOCUMENTS. period

    MARCH 4, 1789 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    ————————————————————

    THE LAW OF THE LAND IS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

    TRUMP IS THE  LAW AND ORDER PRESIDENT

    GOD BLESS PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

    GOD BLESS NEIL GORSUCH


  • Terrorist Slaughters and Gun Control

    Subject:  IN COLD BLOOD

    Original Message (an email  I received today)

    1. KILMER My question would be: Why have you and our U.S. Senators in Washington State, sat on your hands, bathing in the cold blood of our U.S. citizens being murdered by Muslim’s? Particularly in GUN FREE ZONES! How dare the governments of OUR country vote to remove our second amendment right to protect our FAMILIES. In our supermarkets, department stores, movie theaters, sports events, airports, train & bus stations, our military bases and in Our OWN HOUSES on OUR OWN land. CLOSE the borders now sir! Islam has claimed WAR ON THE U.S. It’s time Congress did the same and hold OUR president accountable for the blood baths across the globe, as his democrat colleagues cheer him on. How many dead victims from Muslim attacks since 9/11? Piece by piece Mr. Kilmer the attacks on American soil continue and may have even surpassed the numbers that actually perished in the Trade Center tragedy. What is wrong in Olympia? Are you all enjoying the duck shoots rampaging across the country?
      Do something or please step down. All of you. Close the borders and STOP immigration and Refugees (?) from entering our country NOW! This is WAR! Our Congress is guilty of murder Mr. Kilmer. How many more men, women and children have to die because of your inaction? Do the job you were hired to do.

    OR THE BIGGER QUESTION IS DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT YOUR JOB IS?

    ——————————————————–

    For clarification and identification  of the  Washington  State elected Representatives in congress they are Rep. Derek Kilmer (D) and Senators Maria Cantwell (D) and Patty Murray (D)

    Orlando massacre JUST  ANOTHER radical Islamic terrorist attack on American Citizens

    JUST ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY for the liberals (D)  to “JUMP ON THE GUN CONTROL” in congress

    As a voting American citizen, I agree 100% with the questions, suggestions and conclusion in the above comment..

    ———————————————————

    I am compelled to ask an additional question

    DOES THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS  EVEN KNOW WHAT THEIR JOB IS?

    PREAMBLE CONSTITUTION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION, ESTABLISH JUSTICE,

    INSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE,

     PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE,

    AND SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY, DO ORDAIN AND ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    to be continued…..


  • The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE …
    THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

    ————————————
    THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD,
    Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;

    —————–
    Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;

    —————————-
    Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted of man’s material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
    Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:

    —————————————————————–
    (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required of preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    (b) the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
    (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    Call on the negotiating states:
    (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
    (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
    (c) Also to seek – without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program – agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
    Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
    (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safe-guarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
    (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
    (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
    (d) As stated relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation an common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
    (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
    Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
    STAGE I
    A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
    (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
    (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
    (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
    (d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.
    C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
    (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
    (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
    (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
    (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
    (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfer to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
    (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
    E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
    (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
    (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle. F. To reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
    (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
    (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations of the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.
    G. To Keep the Peace:
    (a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force – including nuclear, conventional, or CBR – contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
    (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
    (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
    (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be despatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STAGE II
    A. International Disarmament Organization:
    The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.
    B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
    (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
    (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.
    D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
    E. To Keep the Peace:
    During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the united Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the united Nations:
    (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the united Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
    (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.
    STAGE III
    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force (emphasis added) and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
    The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
    (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
    (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    The end of Publication 7277


  • 2016 Reestablishing Religious Freedom

      2016 Simply a Bill For Reestablishing 1785 Religious Freedom

    The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom began simply as Bill No. 82,

    “A Bill For Establishing Religious Freedom.”adopted in 1785.

    1785 We the General Assembly of Virginia do enact that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief;

    1785 BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE TO PROFESS, AND BY ARGUMENT TO MAINTAIN, THEIR OPINIONS IN MATTERS OF RELIGION, AND THAT THE SAME SHALL IN NO WISE DIMINISH, ENLARGE, OR AFFECT THEIR CIVIL CAPACITIES.

    ————————————————————————–

     “A 2016 Bill For reestablishing 1785 religious freedom.”

    AH… BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE

    January 2013

    THE BAKERS SAID THEY REFUSED TO MAKE THE CAKE BECAUSE OF THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

    The Oregon bakery owners were forced to pay more than $135,000.00 in damages.

    The Oregonian reported the state has received (TAKEN) a total of $144,000 from the BAKERS

    1785 THAT TO COMPEL A MAN TO FURNISH CONTRIBUTIONS OF MONEY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF OPINIONS WHICH HE DISBELIEVES AND ABHORS, IS SINFUL AND TYRANNICAL

    ————————————————————————————

    THEN…. THE BAKERS WERE SLAPPED WITH A  GAG ORDER THAT PROHIBITED THEM FROM SPEAKING PUBLICLY ABOUT THEIR FAITH, IN A NATIONAL DEBATE OVER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS?

    1785 … UNLESS HE PROFESS OR RENOUNCE THIS OR THAT RELIGIOUS OPINION, IS DEPRIVING HIM INJURIOUSLY OF THOSE PRIVILEGES AND ADVANTAGES TO WHICH, IN COMMON WITH HIS FELLOW CITIZENS, HE HAS A NATURAL RIGHT

    What led to his “cease and desist” order is the key to understanding why it’s accurately called A GAG ORDER THAT PREVENTS THE KLEINS FROM SPEAKING ABOUT THEIR FAITH and their intent to “stay strong” and fight this harassment by the Oregon state government.

    THE BAKERS WERE FINED $135,000.00 DOLLARS AND ALSO SLAPPED WITH A GAG ORDER THAT PROHIBITED THEM FROM SPEAKING PUBLICLY ABOUT THEIR REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BAKE WEDDING CAKES FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGES.

    ———————————————————————————————

      2016 Simply a Bill For Reestablishing 1785 Religious Freedom

    AH… BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE

    Tyler Smith, an attorney representing the BAKERS, told The Oregonian that his clients have not abandoned their appeal of Avakian’s order.

    Bill No. 82 for Established Religious Freedom was adopted in 1785.

    1785  BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE TO PROFESS, AND BY ARGUMENT TO MAINTAIN, THEIR OPINIONS IN MATTERS OF RELIGION, AND THAT THE SAME SHALL IN NO WISE DIMINISH, ENLARGE, OR AFFECT THEIR CIVIL CAPACITIES.

    1785 THAT ALL ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE IT BY TEMPORAL PUNISHMENTS, OR BURTHENS, OR BY CIVIL INCAPACITATIONS, TEND ONLY TO BEGET HABITS OF HYPOCRISY AND MEANNESS,

    1785 WHICH AT ONCE DESTROYS ALL RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, BECAUSE HE BEING OF COURSE JUDGE OF THAT TENDENCY WILL MAKE HIS OPINIONS THE RULE OF JUDGMENT, AND APPROVE OR CONDEMN THE SENTIMENTS OF OTHERS ONLY AS THEY SHALL SQUARE WITH OR DIFFER FROM HIS OWN;

    1785 THAT TO COMPEL A MAN TO FURNISH CONTRIBUTIONS OF MONEY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF OPINIONS WHICH HE DISBELIEVES AND ABHORS, IS SINFUL AND TYRANNICAL

    1785 UNLESS HE PROFESS OR RENOUNCE THIS OR THAT RELIGIOUS OPINION, IS DEPRIVING HIM INJURIOUSLY OF THOSE PRIVILEGES AND ADVANTAGES TO WHICH, IN COMMON WITH HIS FELLOW CITIZENS, HE HAS A NATURAL RIGHT;

     1785 THAT THE IMPIOUS PRESUMPTION OF LEGISLATORS AND RULERS, CIVIL AS WELL AS ECCLESIASTICAL, WHO, BEING THEMSELVES BUT FALLIBLE AND UNINSPIRED MEN, HAVE ASSUMED DOMINION OVER THE FAITH OF OTHERS, SETTING UP THEIR OWN OPINIONS AND MODES OF THINKING

    the bottom line in 1785

    And though we well know that this Assembly, elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding Assemblies, constituted with powers equal to our own, and that therefore to declare this act irrevocable would be of no effect in law;

    YET WE ARE FREE TO DECLARE, AND DO DECLARE, THAT THE RIGHTS HEREBY ASSERTED ARE OF THE NATURAL RIGHTS OF MANKIND, AND THAT IF ANY ACT SHALL BE HEREAFTER PASSED TO REPEAL THE PRESENT OR TO NARROW ITS OPERATION, SUCH ACT WILL BE AN INFRINGEMENT OF NATURAL RIGHT.

    ————————————————————————————–

    2016 We the people must DECLARE which side of history we are on.

    AH… BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE

     2016 Simply a Bill For Reestablishing 1785 Religious Freedom

    Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian awarded the damages nearly six months ago, saying the owners had violated the women’s civil rights by discriminating on the basis of their sexual orientation.

    A 2007 OREGON LAW PROTECTS THE RIGHTS OF GAYS, LESBIANS, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER PEOPLE IN EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS. THE STATE RULED IT ALSO BARS PRIVATE BUSINESSES FROM DISCRIMINATING AGAINST POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS.

    January 2013 when Bowman-Cryer came into the shop with her mother for a cake-tasting appointment. However, Aaron Klein told the women that the bakery didn’t do cakes for same-sex weddings. THE WOMEN FILED COMPLAINTS WITH THE STATE AND TRIGGERED A NATIONAL DEBATE OVER CLAIMS OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AGAINST ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS.

    —————————————————————————————-

    Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will THAT FREE IT SHALL REMAIN by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint;

    1785 THAT ALL ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE IT BY TEMPORAL PUNISHMENTS, OR BURTHENS, OR BY CIVIL INCAPACITATIONS, TEND ONLY TO BEGET HABITS OF HYPOCRISY AND MEANNESS, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone;

    1785 THAT THE IMPIOUS PRESUMPTION OF LEGISLATORS AND RULERS, CIVIL AS WELL AS ECCLESIASTICAL, WHO, BEING THEMSELVES BUT FALLIBLE AND UNINSPIRED MEN, HAVE ASSUMED DOMINION OVER THE FAITH OF OTHERS, SETTING UP THEIR OWN OPINIONS AND MODES OF THINKING

    as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time:

    that even the forcing him to support this or that teacher of his own religious persuasion, is depriving him of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to the particular pastor whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness; and is withdrawing from the ministry those temporary rewards, which proceeding from an approbation of their personal conduct, are an additional incitement to earnest and unremitting labours for the instruction of mankind; that our civil rights have no dependance on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics

    that therefore the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument, unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which, in common with his fellow citizens, he has a natural right; that it tends also to corrupt the principles of that very religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing, with a monopoly of worldly honours and emoluments, THOSE WHO WILL EXTERNALLY PROFESS AND CONFORM TO IT; that though indeed these are criminal who do not withstand such temptation, yet neither are those innocent who lay the bait in their way; that the opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy,

    WHICH AT ONCE DESTROYS ALL RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, BECAUSE HE BEING OF COURSE JUDGE OF THAT TENDENCY WILL MAKE HIS OPINIONS THE RULE OF JUDGMENT, AND APPROVE OR CONDEMN THE SENTIMENTS OF OTHERS ONLY AS THEY SHALL SQUARE WITH OR DIFFER FROM HIS OWN;

    that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate; errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.

    We the General Assembly of Virginia do enact that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

    1785 THAT TO COMPEL A MAN TO FURNISH CONTRIBUTIONS OF MONEY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF OPINIONS WHICH HE DISBELIEVES AND ABHORS, IS SINFUL AND TYRANNICAL

    the bottom line in 1785

    And though we well know that this Assembly, elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding Assemblies, constituted with powers equal to our own, and that therefore to declare this act irrevocable would be of no effect in law;

    YET WE ARE FREE TO DECLARE, AND DO DECLARE, THAT THE RIGHTS HEREBY ASSERTED ARE OF THE NATURAL RIGHTS OF MANKIND, AND THAT IF ANY ACT SHALL BE HEREAFTER PASSED TO REPEAL THE PRESENT OR TO NARROW ITS OPERATION, SUCH ACT WILL BE AN INFRINGEMENT OF NATURAL RIGHT.

     2016 Simply a Bill For Reestablishing 1785 Religious Freedom

    We the people must DECLARE which side of history we are on.

    AH… BUT THAT ALL MEN SHALL BE FREE


  • Hewitt’s GOP Tirade on the Triad

    Hugh Hewitt’s GOP DEBATE TIRADE  on the NUCLEAR TRIAD
    Comments based on the GOP DEBATE DEC. 15, 2015
    As the nine Candidates sparred over ways to fight ISIS
    Some guy, Hugh Hewitt asked two “GOTCHA” questions
    Hewitt’s First question.Which part of the nuclear triad would you prioritize?

    —————————————————————–
    By definition “NUCLEAR TRIAD” refers to the NUCLEAR WEAPONS DELIVERY of a strategic nuclear arsenal which consists of three components, TRADITIONALLY STRATEGIC BOMBERS, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

    —————————

    Remember, the nine Candidates were sparring over ways to fight ISIS
    ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD SUGGEST USING THE NUCLEAR TRIAD TO FIGHT ISLAMIC EXTREMIST TERRORIST

    ———————————————-

    WHICH PART OF THE “NUCLEAR TRIAD” WOULD YOU PRIORITIZE FOR THE DELIVERY OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, FOR FIGHTING THE WAR ON TERROR? STRATEGIC BOMBERS? INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES (ICBMS)?  SUBMARINE-LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILES (SLBMS)?

    TRUMP AND CARSON WERE CLEARLY IN A CONUNDRUM  ATTEMPTING TO ANSWER THE STUPID, IRRELEVANT QUESTION FOR FIGHTING ISIS TERRORISTS

    ———————————————————-

    Immediately,

    Hugh Hewitt went into his GOP debate Tirade on the Nuclear Triad
    “It’s an executive order”
    It’s a commander-in-chief decision. …..
    “YOU MAN ENOUGH TO KILL THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT CHILDREN?
    It takes a special sort of commitment to medieval justice to go after the families of criminals for their sins? calling him on this EXTREMELY INSANE PLAN.

    ——————–
    COMMENT POSTED DEC. 16, 2015
    Hugh Hewitt tried to humiliate Donald Trump last night. Good times!

    ———————————————
    One of the few highlights of Tuesday’s debate was Hugh Hewitt’s attempted “GARROTING” of Donald Trump by asking him a policy question predicated on knowing, well, policy. ( ON THE NUCLEAR TRIAD)

    ————————————————-
    HUGH HEWITT’S ATTEMPTED “GARROTING” OF TRUMP AND CARSON?

    GARROTING? There were a few styles of execution that were universally popular – hanging, firing squad and beheading – but there were others that were more regional. TAKE GARROTING FOR EXAMPLE; this method of execution was popular mostly in Spain and France and some Spanish colonies. The convict would sit in a chair and have a metal collar tightened around his neck until he asphyxiated or his spine snapped. I think I would rather be shot. Garroting in public was abolished in Spain in 1897 after which it was only performed in prisons, and the last garroting of a Spanish prisoner was in 1974.n (highlight that)

    AH.. THE GOOD TIMES OF “GARROTING”  TWO GOP PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES

    read more here…
    Hugh Hewitt tried to humiliate Donald Trump last night. Good times!

    ————————–
    HUGH HEWITT GOP DEBATE QUESTION DEC. 15, 2015

    HUGH HEWITT TIRADE ON CARSON AND TRUMP moral, outburst a long, angry speech of criticism or accusation. abuse, speech of censure or denunciation: diatribe, fulmination, harangue,

    HEWITT‘S SECOND QUESTION DEC. 15, 2015

    AS COMMANDER AND CHIEF COULD YOU ORDER AIR STRIKES THAT COULD KILL INNOCENT CHILDREN BY THE THOUSANDS?
    —————————————————————————

    AUG, 6 1945 President Harry Truman did….

     THE AIR STRIKE ON JAPAN THAT KILLED THOUSANDS
    HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI THE DELIVERY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB FROM THE NUCLEAR TRIAD WAS BY TRADITIONAL USE OF STRATEGIC BOMBERS.

    INDEED IT WAS an executive order.
    It was a commander-in-chief decision. …..
    Yes, President Harry Truman was ” man enough to kill thousands of innocent children”
    It takes a special sort of commitment? The first duty of every American President is to protect America’s homeland and the American people.

    7/25/45: Sec. of War Henry Stimson and Army Chief of Staff George Marshall approved and sent the order to drop atomic bombs on Japan “after about 3 August 1945” (Leslie Groves, “NOW IT CAN BE TOLD”, pg. 308.]

    AUGUST 6, 1945 THE COMMANDER AND CHIEF, PRESIDENT HARRY TRUMAN, CARRIED OUT THE FIRST OF TWO AIR STRIKES THAT KILLED INNOCENT CHILDREN BY THE THOUSANDS WITH THE FIRST ATOMIC BOMBS.
    —————————————————————————————
    After MANY, MANY, hours of reading and researching the NUCLEAR TRIAD online
    AFTER WATCHING the FIVE HOURS OF THE GOP DEBATES ON DEC.15, 2015

    WHAT’S MY PRIORITY AMONG OUR NUCLEAR TRIAD?

    RETAINING THE JUN 20, 2013 GUIDANCE OF PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE MILITARY COMMANDERS FOR THEIR COMMITMENT OF THE NUCLEAR DELIVERY DEVICES.

    —————————-
    ONE THE ONE HAND, the GUIDANCE directs pursuit of additional reductions in deployed strategic warheads and less reliance on preparing for a surprise nuclear attack.

    ——————————-
    ON THE OTHER HAND, the GUIDANCE reaffirms a COMMITMENT to core Cold War posture characteristics such as counter-force targeting, RETAINING A TRIAD OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCES, and retaining non-strategic nuclear weapons forward deployed in Europe.

    —————————————–
    Hmmm….
    JUN 20, 2013 THIS CONDITION IS EXACERBATED BECAUSE THE REAFFIRMATION OF COUNTER FORCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH A DECISION TO RETAIN (A TRIAD OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCES? ) – albeit at a reduced level – the ability to Launch Under Attack if directed (see below).
    ——————————————————

    New Nuclear Weapons Employment Guidance Puts …

    fas.org › Strategic Security
    Federation of American Scientists

    New Nuclear Weapons Employment Guidance Puts Obama’s Fingerprint on Nuclear Weapons Policy and Strategy. Posted on Jun.20, 2013 in Arms Control, …
    fas.org › Strategic Security Federation of American Scientists
    Jun 20, 2013 – INSTEAD, THE REAL NUCLEAR NEWS OF THE DAY WERE
    THE RESULTS OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION’S LONG-AWAITED NEW GUIDANCE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS EMPLOYMENT POLICY that was explained in a White House fact sheet and a more in-depth report to Congress.

    —————–
    From a nuclear arms control perspective, the NEW GUIDANCE is a mixed bag.

    ——————————
    Repeated for clarity, ONE THE ONE HAND, the GUIDANCE directs pursuit of additional reductions in deployed strategic warheads and less reliance on preparing for a surprise nuclear attack.

    —————————–
    Repeated for clarity, ON THE OTHER HAND, the GUIDANCE reaffirms a commitment to core Cold War posture characteristics such as counterforce targeting, RETAINING A TRIAD OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCES, and retaining non-strategic nuclear weapons forward deployed in Europe.
    This reaffirmation is perhaps the single most important indicator that the NEW GUIDANCE fails to “put and end to Cold War thinking” as envisioned by the Prague speech.

    Because? “counterforce is preemptive or offensively reactive,” IN THE WORDS OF A STRATCOM-LED STUDY FROM 2002, reaffirmation of nuclear counterforce reaffirms highly offensive planning that is unnecessarily threatening for deterrence to work in the 21st Century.

    ————————————————
    Repeated for clarity, JUN 20, 2013 THIS CONDITION IS EXACERBATED BECAUSE THE REAFFIRMATION OF COUNTERFORCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH A DECISION TO RETAIN (A TRIAD OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCES? ) – albeit at a reduced level – the ability to Launch Under Attack if directed.

    HMMM…..

    NOW, WHAT’S “YOUR” PRIORITY AMONG OUR NUCLEAR TRIAD?

    (see below).

    ————————————————————————–

    Obama’s secret Iran deals exposed – The Washington Post

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/obamas-secret-ira…
    The Washington Post
    JUL 27, 2015 – PRESIDENT OBAMA PROMISED THAT HIS NUCLEAR DEAL WITH IRAN WOULD NOT BE “BASED ON TRUST” BUT RATHER “UNPRECEDENTED VERIFICATION.” NOW IT TURNS OUT …
    ——————————————————————-
    WANT TO READ MORE…. (I did) 1940-2014

    Timeline of the Nuclear Age [1940s] | atomicarchive.com

    www.atomicarchive.com › Library
    This comprehensive timeline traces the nuclear age, from the discovery of x-rays in … Topics also include radioactivity and the explosion of the first atomic bomb.

    Nuclear weapons timeline – ICAN | International Campaign …

    www.icanw.org/…/t…
    International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons
    The US sets up the Manhattan Project to develop the first nuclear weapon. It eventually employs more than 130,000 people and costs US$2 billion ($25 billion in …


  • The Call of Duty 1941-2015

    The Call of Duty 1941-2015

    Jan. 6, 1941 THE PRESIDENTS CALL OF CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY

    Jan. 6, 1941, THEREFORE, AS YOUR PRESIDENT, PERFORMING MY CONSTUTIONAL DUTY TO, “give to the Congress information of the state of the Union,” I find it, unhappily, necessary to report that the future and the safety of our country and of our democracy are overwhelmingly involved in events far beyond our borders.

    THIS WARNING TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER WAS GIVEN ON JAN 6, 1941 ELEVEN MONTHS BEFORE THE SNEAK ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR ON DEC. 7, 1941.

    —————————————————————————

    2015, THEREFORE, PRESIDENT OBAMA,  IT IS YOUR  CONSTUTIONAL DUTY TO, “give to the Congress information of the state of the Union.”

    ————————————————————-

    INDEED, THERE IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT TERRORIST DANGER TO AMERICA.

    The need of the moment is that YOUR PRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS AND YOUR PRESIDENTIAL POLICY SHOULD  be devoted primarily — almost exclusively — to meeting this foreign peril. — to meeting TERRORIST ATTACKS  FAR BEYOND OUR BORDERS AND THE OVERWHELMING THREAT THAT RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS. ISIS AND AL’QUIDA POSE TO THE SAFETY AND FUTURE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  For all our domestic problems are now a part of the great emergency.

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much from the RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS  in the past years, 911 TWIN TOWERS… BOSTON..

     In Europe, Paris, Africa,  TERRORIST ATTACKS  FAR BEYOND OUR BORDERS AND THE OVERWHELMING  THREAT THAT RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS. ISIS AND AL’QUIDA POSE TO THE SAFETY AND FUTURE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much….

    GLOBALLY,RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS, ISIS AND  AL’QUIDA HAVE STRATEGIC POINTS FROM WHICH TO OPERATE

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much

    The  strategic points are occupied by TERRORIST CELLS and by their dupes — and A GREAT NUMBER OF THEM ARE AMASSED IN THE U.S.A. AND THROUGH OUT THE WORLD.

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much from THE HISTORY of

    THE  RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS.

    And today it is abundantly evident that INFORMED American citizens everywhere are demanding and supporting speedy and complete action in recognition of obvious danger.

     —————————————————————————————–

    A PRESIDENT’S CALL OF DUTY

    1941 I ADDRESS YOU….the Members of this new Congress, at a moment unprecedented in the history of the Union. I use the word “unprecedented,” because at no previous time has American security been as seriously threatened from without as it is today.

    I find it, unhappily, necessary to report that the future and the safety of our country and of our democracy are overwhelmingly involved in events far beyond our borders.

    It is not probable that any enemy would be stupid enough to attack us by landing troops in the United States from across thousands of miles of ocean, until it had acquired strategic bases from which to operate.

    The first phase of the invasion of this Hemisphere would not be the landing of regular troops. The necessary strategic points would be occupied by secret agents and by their dupes — and great numbers of them are already here, and in Latin America.

    As long as the aggressor nations maintain the offensive, they — not we — will choose the time and the place and the method of their attack.

    But we learn much from the lessons of the past years in Europe — particularly the lesson of Norway, whose essential seaports were captured by treachery and surprise built up over a series of years.

    ———————————————————

    THIS WARNING TO CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WAS GIVEN ON JAN 6, 1941 ELEVEN MONTHS BEFORE THE SNEAK ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR ON DEC. 7, 1941.

    Pearl Harbor Naval Base, Hawaii, was attacked by Japanese torpedo and bomber planes on December 7, 1941, at 7:55 a.m. Hawaii time. The sneak attack sparked …

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much from HISTORY

    WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE  learned much from THE HISTORY of

    THE  RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS.

    Those who do not learn from history ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT.

    ————————————————————————————————

    I find it, unhappily, necessary to report that PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THOSE MEMBERS OF THE U.S. CONGRESS THAT FEEL NO COMPULSION TO OR FOR ANY “CALL OF CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY” TO INFORM, PROTECT AND PROVIDE, TRANQUILLITY TO “WE THE PEOPLE” CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

     HAVE LEARNED NOTHING FROM HISTORY…..

    Those who do not learn from history ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT.

    ——————————————————————————-

    December 7, 1941

    1. Pearl Harbor AttackU-S-History.com

    www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1649.html

    Pearl Harbor Naval Base, Hawaii, was attacked by Japanese torpedo and bomber planes on December 7, 1941, at 7:55 a.m. Hawaii time. The sneak attack sparked …

    ————————————————————————————–

     


  • The Warning on U.S. Terrorist Attacks

    The U.S. Warning on  Terrorist Attacks

    THEY, THE ISIS AND AL’QUIDA TERRORIST  — NOT WE — WILL CHOOSE THE TIME AND THE PLACE AND THE METHOD OF THEIR ATTACKS

    ————————————————————-

    An American  Presidents State of the Union speech warning the U.S. congress of foreign peril.

     I address you, the Members of this new Congress, at a moment unprecedented in the history of the Union. I use the word “unprecedented,” because at no previous time has American security been as seriously threatened from without as it is today.

    Therefore, as your President, performing my constitutional duty to “give to the Congress information of the state of the Union,” I find it, unhappily, necessary to report that the future and the safety of our country and of our democracy are overwhelmingly involved in events far beyond our borders.

    The need of the moment is that our actions and our policy should be devoted primarily — almost exclusively — to meeting this foreign peril. For all our domestic problems are now a part of the great emergency.

    As a nation, we may take pride in the fact that we are softhearted; but we cannot afford to be soft-headed.

    Every realist knows that the democratic way of life is at this moment being directly assailed in every part of the world—assailed either by arms, or by secret spreading of poisonous propaganda by those who seek to destroy unity and promote discord in nations that are still at peace. The spreading of poisonous propaganda which is being carried on under the new order of tyranny that seeks to spread over every continent today.

    The American people have unalterably set their faces against that tyranny.

    And today it is abundantly evident that American citizens everywhere are demanding and supporting speedy and complete action in recognition of obvious danger.

    The best way of dealing with the few slackers or trouble makers in our midst is, first, to shame them by patriotic example, and, if that fails, to use the sovereignty of Government to save Government.

    The first phase of the invasion of this Hemisphere would not be the landing of regular troops. The necessary strategic points would be occupied by secret agents and by their dupes —AND GREAT NUMBERS OF THEM ARE ALREADY HERE, and in Latin America.

    As long as the aggressor nations maintain the offensive, THEY  —  NOT WE — WILL CHOOSE THE TIME AND THE PLACE AND THE METHOD OF THEIR ATTACKS

    That is why the future of all the American Republics is today in serious danger.

    Jan 6, 1941 Franklin Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms speech”  warning the U.S.  congress of foreign peril eleven months before the Pearl Harbor attack.

    ————————————————————————–

    To President Obama, Mr. Speaker, Members of the Congress:

    What part of learning from history do you not understand?

    the bottom line

    We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American eagle in order to feather their own nests.

    The best way of dealing with the few slacker in our midst, President Obama and those members of congress, is, first, to shame them by patriotic example, and, if that fails, to use the sovereignty of Government to save Government.

    And today it is abundantly evident that American citizens everywhere are demanding and supporting speedy and complete action in recognition of the obvious danger of ISIS AND AL’QUIDA TERRORIST ATTACKS.

     


  • WA State Human Environment

    The Human Environment In WA State

    This is WA State Law RCW 77.12.154  These “STATE  EMPLOYEES” may enter upon “ANY LAND” or waters and remain there while performing their duties WITHOUT LIABILITY FOR TRESPASS.

    Presumed by,  WA State Attorney Generals  office, to be Constitutional?

    THESE “STATE  EMPLOYEES” MAY ENTER UPON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY, “ANY LAND”  IN WA STATE, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION  WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND WITHOUT A SEARCH WARRANT.

    ————————————————————————————–

    THIS IS THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT under WA State Law RCW 77.12.154 .

    The Government has taken the position that they can do whatever they want, where ever they want and whenever they want, without Constitutional due process of law.

    ——————————————————————————————–

    Who Knew? About this is WA State Law RCW 77.12.154

    It took me two months, with the help of an attorney,  to find this  WA State Law, it was buried under the  “Right of entry”  Aircraft operated by department.

    —————————————————————————————————-

    DISBELIEF AND DENIAL  IS THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT IN WA STATE.

    When I told American Citizens about the law, they wouldn’t believe me. They said

    They can’t do that on my “PRIVATE PROPERTY”  I have Constitutional Rights. the government can’t do that without my permission, without probable cause and without a search warrant.

     —————————————————————————————–

     You want to bet the government can’t do it on your private property?

    I have the documentation of hundreds of these trespass violations on Lake Sutherland private property.

    THESE “STATE  EMPLOYEES” DID ENTER UPON MY PRIVATE PROPERTY, “MY LAND”  IN CLALLAM COUNTY, WA STATE, WITHOUT ANY DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WITHOUT MY PERMISSION  WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE AND WITHOUT A SEARCH WARRENT.

    In fact it is documented that FROM APRIL 21, 2010   TO FEB. 5, 2011 WDFW did knowingly trespass on every piece of private property AROUND LAKE SUTHERLAND, And on every piece of private property from Lake Sutherland down and on both sides of Indian Creek to the Elwha River.,without due process of law, without permission, without probable cause and without a search warrant.

    ————————————————————————-

    THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT IN WA STATE?

    Indeed, The government has  been TRESPASSING  on private land and they are going to keep TRESPASSING on private land, and keep TRESPASSING on private land until “We the People” demanded Constitutional Due Process.

    “The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”

     ——————————————————————————————-

    This is the PRESUMED CONSTITUTIONAL law of the LAND in WA STATE.
    Goggle it for yourself… CHAPTER 77.12 RCW POWERS AND DUTIES

     THE 2011 Response from WA State Attorney General’s office
    ANY RCW, LAW PASSED BY WA STATE LEGISLATORS IS PRESUMED TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL

    —————————————————————————————

    UNDER RCW 77.12.154  THIS IS THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT IN WA STATE.

    You live in an isolated area…. on 20 acres of private property…you are home alone…. you are a senior citizen… your husband is gone….you look out your kitchen window…… there is a strange man walking around in your back yard…. he has walked several blocks into your private property, on your private road…
    With your husband gone…. what should you do?

    IT HAPPENED TO MY (removed for privacy)   WHAT DID SHE DO?

    SHE OWNS A GUN…

    She went outside and confronted the TRESPASSER. “This is private property” “What are you doing here?”

    The strangers response (he did not identify himself) was “I just wanted to see where this stream came from.”

    She told him, “This is private property” and asked him to get off of her land.

    So if you see some unknown guy, anytime, anywhere, A TOTAL stranger wandering around and trespassing IN YOUR BACKYARD, on your private property?

    Without your permission, without probable cause and without a search warrant?

    WHAT WILL YOU DO?

    ———————————————————————————————–

    THIS IS PRESUMED TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL?

    WA STATE EMPLOYEES? that do not wear a uniform? do not identify themselves? use your private road for access,  go sniffing  around in their official capacity, inspecting your 20 acres of private property, and  invading your privacy  in your own  back yard?

    This is the PRESUMED law of the land in WA STATE?

    —————————————————————————————-

    PRESUMED TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL?

    RCW 77.12.154
    Right of entry —
    Aircraft operated by department.
    The director, fish and wildlife officers, ex officio fish and wildlife officers, and department employees may enter upon ANY LAND or waters and remain there while performing their duties without liability for trespass.

    It is lawful for aircraft operated by the department to land and take off from the beaches or waters of the state.
    [1998 c 190 § 71; 1983 1st ex.s. c 46 § 19; 1955 c 12 § 75.08.160. Prior: 1949 c 112 § 13; Rem. Supp. 1949 § 5780-212. Formerly RCW 75.08.160.]
    —————————————————————————————-
    WA State law RCW77.12.154
    WDFW employees may enter upon ANY LAND or waters and remain there while performing their duties without liability for trespass.

    —————————————————————————

    THE 2011 Response from WA State Attorney General’s office
    ANY RCW LAW PASSED BY WA STATE LEGISLATORS IS PRESUMED TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL

    ————————————————————————————————————-

    And, When “THEY” Came  to Lake Sutherland, Clallam County, in WA State.

    Read the full text, complete chronological documentation of government trespass here.

    Presumed to be Constitutional?

    Posted on by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    This is the documented chronological order of the CLALLAM COUNTY TRESPASS

    PART (1)  FROM APRIL 21, 2010   TO FEB. 5, 2011

    AND WHAT I DID

    DOCUMENT… DOCUMENT… DOCUMENT…


  • Confront? Question? Demand?

    Confront? Question? Demand?

    Why do  I  personally bother to attend and speak out at  Rep. Derek Kilmer’s Town Hall Meetings?

    Someone’s  GOT TO DO IT … speak  out publicly, in front of the local news media on THE FEDERAL UNMENTIONABLES.

    Someone’s  got to  confronted him with the evidence, ask the hard questions, compel him to face or consider something and  demand answers.

    As our elected rep. in WA DC Rep. Derek Kilmer is responsible to us.

    WHAT WILL  KILMER  DO IN RESPONSE TO

    THE FEDERAL UNMENTIONABLES?

    1. The ISIS terrorist attacks, 62% of Americans are VERY CONCERNED?

    2.  How Is he going to VOTE to prevent the Olympic Peninsula Electronic WAR GAMES. from destroying our entire coastline of public land? And, the entire coastline from Alaska to Mexico?

    3.   How Is he going to VOTE on the FINANCIAL immigration  Crisis? Dec 3, 2014 – Seventeen states filed a joint lawsuit in federal court Wednesday to try blocking President Barack Obama’s executive order on immigration.

    4.  How is he going to VOTE to reform the Obamacare debacle?

    5. Is he going to address the economic crisis created by SUE AND SETTLE?  (ESA)  taking of public and private land, in violation of the Administrate Procedure Act

    6. Is he going to demand JUSTICE from the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT?

    7.  Is he going to support the return of individual states Sovereignty, to the States, of the United States of America? So we can “MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS”

    8. Rep Kilmer put it in writing,  I’ll continue my fight during this Congress to put our government back in the hands of “We the People.”

    —————————————————————————————-

     OK, REP. KILMER, THIS IS WHAT WE THE PEOPLE WANT?

    WHAT REPRESENTATIVE FEEDBACK ARE WE GOING TO GET FROM YOU?

    We the People of the United States, in Order to RE-FORM a more perfect Union,

    MUST RE- ESTABLISH The  Constitution of  the United States of America.

    MUST RE-ESTABLISH JUSTICE,

    MUST INSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY

    MUST PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE

    MUST PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE

    MUST RE-SECURE the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,

    We do ordain and MUST INSIST ON  the RE-ESTABLISHMENT of the Constitution for the United States of America.

    ————————————————————————————

    Rep. Kilmer Newsletter, below,  states,  I’ll be holding six town hall meetings so I can hear directly from you elected Rep. Kilmer will be holding six town hall meetings so I can hear directly from you. I want to stress these town halls are open to the public, and I encourage everyone to attend.

    It’s time to bring sanity back?

    Despite the overall dysfunction?

    I’ll continue my fight during this Congress to put our government back in the hands of “We the People.”

    Make the government more transparent and responsive?

    ————————————————————

    I, personally, SHALL continue my fight to put our federal, state and local governments  accountable and back in the hands of “We the People.”

    Even if I have to go it alone, with my boots on the ground and making public comments  at public forums.

    And, on my website behindmyback.org  in cyberspace