+menu-


  • Category Archives July 2014 This is America?
  • A Gag Order on Paul Revere?

    A Gag Order on Paul Revere?

    Imagine IF THE BRITISH PATROL had been able to put a “GAG ORDER” on Paul Revere?

    IF THE BRITISH PATROL HAD  BEEN ABLE TO PREVENT

    PAUL REVERE FROM SPEAKING OR CRYING OUT?

    ——————————————————————————–

     July 29, 2014 THE MIDNIGHT RIDE OF PAUL REVERE

    COULD HAVE ENDED UP LIKE THIS…

    THE BRITISH PATROL

    STOPPED  PAUL IN BOSTON BEFORE HIS MIDNIGHT RIDE  

    THEY ASKED PAUL STUPID IRRELEVANT QUESTIONS  

    WHAT’S THE BIG RUSH?

    WHAT ARE YOU DOING GALLOPING AROUND THE COUNTRY SIDE  AT THIS TIME OF NIGHT?

    THEY DEMANDED HIS PAPERS

    WHERE ARE YOU GOING?

    WHERE DID YOU COME FROM?

    PAUL ANSWERED 17 QUESTIONS

    THEY DIDN’T LIKE HIS ANSWERS

    THEY JERKED PAUL OFF OF HIS HORSE

    THREW PAUL ON THE GROUND

    KICKED  PAUL  AROUND

    PUT SHACKLES ON HIM

    PUT A GAG IN PAUL’S MOUTH

    SHOT PAUL’S  HORSE

    THE BRITISH PATROL ARRESTED PAUL

    DETAINING PAUL FOR A REASONABLE? AMOUNT OF TIME

    THE BRITISH RELEASED HIM THE NEXT DAY.

    —————————————————————————————

    WANT MORE? READ MORE..

    JOHN STOSSEL “Is this America?”

    ———————————————————————————-

    THE REAL April 18, 1775  STORY OF PAUL REVERES RIDE

    http://www.paulreverehouse.org/ride/real.html

    IN 1774 AND THE SPRING OF 1775 PAUL REVERE was employed by the Boston Committee of Correspondence and the Massachusetts Committee of Safety AS AN EXPRESS RIDER TO CARRY NEWS, MESSAGES, and copies of resolutions as far away as New York and Philadelphia.

    On the evening of April 18, 1775, Paul Revere was sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and instructed to ride to Lexington, Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them. After being rowed across the Charles River to Charlestown by two associates,

    Paul Revere borrowed a horse from his friend Deacon John Larkin. While in Charlestown, he verified that the local “SONS OF LIBERTY” committee had seen his pre-arranged signals. (Two lanterns had been hung briefly in the bell-tower of Christ Church in Boston, indicating that troops would row “by sea” across the Charles River to Cambridge, rather than marching “by land” out Boston Neck.

    Revere had arranged for these signals the previous weekend, as he was afraid that he might be prevented from leaving Boston).

    On the way to Lexington, REVERE “ALARMED” THE COUNTRY-SIDE, stopping at each house, and arrived in Lexington about midnight. As he approached the house where Adams and Hancock were staying,

     A SENTRY ASKED THAT HE NOT MAKE SO MUCH NOISE. “NOISE!” CRIED REVERE, “YOU’LL HAVE NOISE ENOUGH BEFORE LONG. The regulars are coming out!”

    After delivering his message, Revere was joined by a second rider, William Dawes, who had been sent on the same errand by a different route. Deciding on their own to continue on to Concord, Massachusetts, where weapons and supplies were hidden, Revere and Dawes were joined by a third rider, Dr. Samuel Prescott.

    SOON AFTER, ALL THREE WERE ARRESTED BY A BRITISH PATROL. Prescott escaped almost immediately, and Dawes soon after.

    REVERE WAS HELD FOR SOME TIME AND THEN RELEASED. Left without a horse, Revere returned to Lexington in time to witness part of the battle on the Lexington Green.

    ———————————————————————-

     

    What WAS? and  is?  the intention of a   “GAG ORDER?”

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gag+Order

    A COURT ORDER DIRECTED TO ATTORNEYS AND WITNESSES not to discuss the case with the media—such order being felt necessary to assure the defendant of a fair trial. A COURT ORDER, DIRECTED TO THE MEDIA, NOT TO REPORT CERTAIN ASPECTS OF A CRIME OR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION prior to trial.

    Of the three methods that the Court found available to a judge when faced with a disruptive defendant—GAG AND SHACKLES, CITATION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT, AND PHYSICAL REMOVAL—

    The Court held that A GAG AND SHACKLES should be considered the option of last resort. According to the Court,

    Not only is it possible that THE SIGHT OF SHACKLES AND GAGS MIGHT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT on the jury’s feelings about the defendant,

    but the use of this technique IS ITSELF SOMETHING OF AN AFFRONT TO THE VERY DIGNITY AND DECORUM OF judicial proceedings that the judge is seeking to uphold.

    ——————————————————————————-

    July 29, 2014 FEDERAL “GAG ORDERS?”

    GAG? GAGGED? WITNESSES? THE MEDIA? AND ATTORNEYS?

    GAG- GAGGED by definition: Restraint of speech, A RESTRAINT ON FREE SPEECH

    Something put over the mouth, something such as a piece of cloth THAT IS FORCIBLY PUT over or into somebody’s mouth TO PREVENT THE PERSON FROM SPEAKING OR CRYING OUT.

    —————————————————————————–

    SPEAKING OF GAGGED – THE PROPOSED CREST ACT

    Senators John McCain (R-AZ), and Jeff Flake (R-AZ), are the driving force behind a frightening bill that would criminalize citizens standing up for their communities!

    In fact, if the bill were a law during the Murrieta, California standoff when hundreds of citizens successfully protested against Obama’s Illegal Invasion into their town, everyone who protested could be facing stiff fines and federal jail time!

    Here’s what the so-called “CREST Act” has in store for citizens trying to protect their property, their families and their way of life:

    • Makes it a federal crime to tell someone where a Department of Homeland Security (DHS), or Health and Human Services (HHS), or Border Patrol bus carrying illegal aliens is spotted, coming from or headed.

    • Makes it a federal crime to prohibit a DHS, HHS, or Border Patrol bus from moving from point A to point B.

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    GAGS AND SHACKLES, AND PHYSICAL REMOVAL

    July 29, 2014 THE SIGHT OF SHACKLES AND GAGS MIGHT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT?

    July 29, 2014 THE SIGHT OF AND THE USE OF, ARMED MILITIA, BORDER GUARDS, TAZERS, SHACKLES, HANDCUFFS, DETENTION, ARREST, PHYSICAL ABUSE AND ABUSE OF POWER, MIGHT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT?

    JOHN STOSSEL “Is this America?”

    July 29, 2014  THE USE OF THIS TECHNIQUE IS ITSELF SOMETHING OF AN AFFRONT TO THE VERY DIGNITY AND DECORUM OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    July 29, 2014 UNCONSTITUTIONAL? ILLEGAL? UNHEALTHY? OR IN VIOLATION OF SPECIFIC PUBLIC POLICIES?

     

    ————————————————————————————

    WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION LAWS”

    SO? Because a lot of REALLY NASTY GOVERNMENT CRAP was going on behind our backs and behind closed doors… The “ WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION LAWS” were created
    The underlying purpose of whistleblower protection laws is to allow employees to stop, report, or testify about employer ACTIONS THAT ARE ILLEGAL, UNHEALTHY, OR VIOLATE SPECIFIC PUBLIC POLICIES.

    —————————————————————————————————-

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gag+Order

    Of the three methods that the Court found available to a judge when faced with a disruptive defendant—GAG AND SHACKLES, CITATION FOR CONTEMPT, AND PHYSICAL REMOVAL—

    The Court held that A GAG AND SHACKLES should be considered the option of last resort. According to the Court,

    Not only is it possible that THE SIGHT OF SHACKLES AND GAGS MIGHT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT on the jury’s feelings about the defendant,

    but the use of this technique IS ITSELF SOMETHING OF AN AFFRONT TO THE VERY DIGNITY AND DECORUM OF judicial proceedings that the judge is seeking to uphold.

     A court order TO GAG OR BIND AN UNRULY defendant OR REMOVE HER OR HIM FROM the courtroom

     IN ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER INTERRUPTIONS in a trial. In a trial with a great deal of notoriety, a court order directed to attorneys and witnesses not to discuss the case with the media—such order being felt necessary to assure the defendant of a fair trial. A COURT ORDER, DIRECTED TO THE MEDIA, NOT TO REPORT CERTAIN ASPECTS OF A CRIME OR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION prior to trial.

    [A] defendant can lose his right to be present at trial if, after he has been warned by the judge that HE WILL BE REMOVED IF HE CONTINUES HIS DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR, HE NEVERTHELESS INSISTS ON CONDUCTING HIMSELF IN A MANNER SO DISORDERLY, DISRUPTIVE, AND DISRESPECTFUL of the court that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom. Once lost, the right to be present can, of course, be reclaimed as soon as the defendant is willing to conduct himself consistently with the decorum and respect inherent in the concept of courts and judicial proceedings.

     

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Gag+Order