+menu-


  • Category Archives It’s All About the Money.
  • WA State Ecology is Back to WAC Us

    Chapter 173-03 WAC, PUBLIC RECORDS

    Incorporates changes made by Emergency Rule- WAC 173-03-9000E

    Why it matters?

    SIMPLY PUT…..

    Behind My Back | “Ecology Sucks”

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/04/15/ecology-sucks/

    APR 15, 2013 – “Ecology Sucks” And, the rest of the story. The local news … citizenreviewonline.org/ecologys-qa-session-in-sequim-about-… Jan 17, 2013 …

     How much will PUBLIC RECORDS cost us?

    ——————————————————–

    Behind My Back | WA State DOE Emergency Fee Rule?

    www.behindmyback.org/2017/07/24/wa-state-doe-emergency-fee-rule/

    JUL 24, 2017 – July 20, 2016 Public Records Emergency Rule WAC 173-03-9000E CALCULATION OF ACTUAL COSTS OF PRODUCING COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS DECLARED …

    WA STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY finds that it is in the general welfare and the public interest, and benefits requesters and the agency, to adopt the emergency rule in order to preserve AND UPDATE FEES in accordance with the legislatively adopted schedule.

    WITHOUT FURTHER ACTION, THIS WOULD CREATE A PERIOD OF MONTHS DURING WHICH NO STATEMENT OR RULE WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC REGARDING PRA (PUBLIC RECORDS ACT) COSTS

    OR THE METHODS OF CALCULATING THEM, CREATING CONFUSION AND UNCERTAINTY REGARDING ECOLOGY’S FEE STRUCTURE AND ITS (WA STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY’S) ABILITY TO CHARGE FEES.

    ———————————————————————–

    EINSTEIN SAID, “IF YOU CAN’T PUT IT SIMPLY, YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND IT VERY WELL”

    JAN 17, 2013  “IT’S A MONEY DEAL,” I said, adding, “ECOLOGY SUCKS”,  (which prompted a flurry of applause)

    SIMPLY PUT:  THE WA STATE  DEPT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) CHANGES TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS  A MONEY DEAL.

    JAN 20, 2013 “ECOLOGY SUCKS” WAS MY  PUBLISHED OPINION AND ON SEPT 22, 2017  I’M STICKING WITH IT!

    —————————————————————

    This is the 994th posting on behindmyback.org since Jan 29, 2013

    This posting is over 3000 words.

    —————————————————————————–

    Complete unedited text

    —– Original Message —–

    From: Ballard, Laura (ECY)

    To: ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK@LISTSERV.WA.GOV

    Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 6:52 AM

    Subject: The following rulemaking proposal was filed with the Office of the Code Reviser: Chapter 173-03 WAC, Public Records The following rulemaking proposal was filed with the Office of the Code Reviser: September 15, 2017

    Chapter 173-03 WAC, Public Records

    For more information:

    http://www.ecy.wa.gov/laws-rules/wac17303/1614ov.html

    ——————————————————————

    Chapter 173-03 WAC Public Records

    Incorporates changes made by Emergency Rule- WAC 173-03-9000E

    Overview

    Introduction

    The Department of Ecology is proposing amendments to Chapter 173-03 WAC Public Records. The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of the Public Records Act including the process the agency uses for disclosing records.

    This update will modernize the rule to reflect current law, technology, and processes. On 7/20/17 we filed an emergency rule amendment to implement changes passed by the legislature during the 2017 legislative session.  This emergency rule will be in place until 11/17/2017.  The content of this emergency rule will be included in the permanent rulemaking we are conducting.

    Why it matters

    The rule has not been updated since 1998 and needs to reflect current law, technology, and processes. The rule also contains outdated information about Ecology programs and staff, which will be made current and will reflect changes made in the 2017 legislative session.

    Scope of rule development

    Ecology is proposing to amend Chapter 173-03 WAC. This update will modernize the rule to reflect current law, technology, and processes.

    Process of development

    Please refer to the Timeline and Public Involvement information to stay informed about the rulemaking.

    —————————————————————————

    To join or leave ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK click here:

    http://listserv.wa.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK

    ——————————————————————-

    Chapter 173-03 WAC

    PUBLIC RECORDS

    Complete Chapter

    WAC Sections

    173-03-010

    What is the purpose of this chapter?

    173-03-020

    How are specific terms defined in this chapter?

    173-03-030

    How is the department of ecology organized?

    173-03-040

    How do I get access to the public records of the department of ecology?

    173-03-050

    What records are retained and how are they indexed?

    173-03-060

    How do I request a public record?

    173-03-070

    How much will it cost me to view a public record?

    173-03-080

    What happens when the department denies a public records request?

    173-03-090

    What do I do if I object to the department’s denial to review a public record?

    173-03-100

    How does the department protect public records?

     

    ————————————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003?

    WAC 173-03-010

    What is the purpose of this chapter?

    The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 relating to public records.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-010, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-010, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-010, filed 1/17/78.]

    —————————————————————————

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-020

    How are specific terms defined in this chapter?

    (1) The terms “person,” “public record,” and “writing” shall have the meanings as stated in RCW 42.17.020.

    (2) “Department” means the department of ecology.

    (3) “Director” means the director of the department.

    (4) “Public records officer” means the employee designated as such by the department.

    (5) “Designee” means the employee of the department designated by the director or the public records officer to serve as the public records coordinator at the headquarters offices or at each of the regional offices in the absence of the officer.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-020, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-020, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-020, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-030

    How is the department of ecology organized?

    (1) Headquarters office.

    (a) The headquarters office is located at 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, Washington. The mailing address for the headquarters office is:

    Department of Ecology

    P.O. Box 47600

    Olympia, Washington 98504-7600

    The mailing address for the nuclear waste management program’s Hanford project is:

    Nuclear Waste Management

    1315 W. 4th Ave.

    Kennewick, WA 99336

    (b) The offices of the director, deputy director(s), program managers and other agency officials are located in the headquarters office.

    (c) The titles of the executive staff are as follows:

    Chief financial officer for financial services.

    Administrative services manager for administrative services.

    Director for intergovernmental relations.

    Director for employee services.

    Director for communications and education.

    Assistant administrator for spills prevention, preparedness and response.

    (2) The program offices located in the headquarters office are:

    (a) Air quality;

    (b) Water resources;

    (c) Water quality;

    (d) Toxics cleanup;

    (e) Nuclear waste;

    (f) Solid waste and financial assistance;

    (g) Hazardous waste and toxics reductions;

    (h) Environmental investigations and laboratory services; and

    (i) Shorelands and environmental assistance.

    (3) Regional offices and their geographical jurisdictions are as follows:

    (a) Northwest regional office (Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, San Juan, Island, King, and Kitsap counties):

    3190 – 160th Avenue S.E.

    Bellevue, WA 98008-5452

    (b) Southwest regional office (Pierce, Thurston, Mason, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Pacific, Lewis, Cowlitz, Wahkiakum, Clark, and Skamania counties):

    300 Desmond Drive

    Lacey, WA 98503

    Mailing address:

    P.O. Box 47775

    Olympia, Washington 98504-7775

    (c) Central regional office (Okanogan, Chelan, Douglas, Kittitas, Yakima, Benton, and Klickitat counties):

    15 West Yakima, Suite 200

    Yakima, WA 98902-3401

    (d) Eastern regional office (Ferry, Stevens, Pend Oreille, Grant, Lincoln, Spokane, Adams, Whitman, Franklin, Walla Walla, Columbia, Garfield, and Asotin counties):

    1. 4601 Monroe, Suite 100

    Spokane, Washington 99205-1295

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-030, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-030, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-030, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-030, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————–

    WAC 173-03-040

    How do I get access to the public records of the department of ecology?

    (1) All public records of the department are available for public inspection and copying under these rules subject to subsections (2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section.

    (2) Availability of public records is subject to the exemptions and prohibitions against disclosure contained in RCW 42.17.310, 42.17.130, 42.17.255, 42.17.260, and 90.52.020. In addition, individuals may request, and ecology may grant, confidentiality of documents from disclosure under RCW 43.21A.160 and 70.105.170.

    (3) When a public record includes information which, if disclosed, would lead to an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy, and the department becomes aware of this fact, the department shall delete such information before making the record available.

    (4) Public records requested may not be readily available for immediate inspection. If the requested records are not readily available, the department shall notify the requester when and where those records will be available.

    (5) Public records of the department are kept by the department or state archives until scheduled for destruction by the records retention schedule in accordance with chapter 40.14 RCW. Public records subject to a request for disclosure when scheduled for destruction shall be retained by the department and may not be erased or destroyed until the request is resolved.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-040, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-040, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-040, filed 1/17/78.]

    ——————————————————————

    WAC 173-03-050

    What records are retained and how are they indexed?

    The records retention schedule established by the division of state archives of the office of the secretary of state serves as an index for the identification and location of the following records:

    (1) All records issued before July 1, 1990, for which the department has maintained an index;

    (2) Final orders entered after June 30, 1990, that are issued in adjudicative proceedings as defined in RCW 34.05.010(1) and that contain an analysis or decision of substantial importance to the department in carrying out its duties;

    (3) Declaratory orders entered after June 30, 1990, that are issued pursuant to RCW 34.05.240 and that contain an analysis or decision of substantial importance to the department in carrying out its duties; and

    (4) Interpretive statements as defined in RCW 34.05.010(8) that were entered after June 30, 1990.

    The records retention schedule indexes records according to the originating program or section, and then the record series title. Each title is further identified by a statement of function or purpose, and the retention period. The records retention schedule is available to the public for inspection and copying. With the assistance of the public records officer or designee, any person can obtain access to public records of the department using the records retention schedule.

    A separate index of policy statements as defined in RCW 34.05.010(4) entered after June 30, 1990, shall be maintained by the department’s policy manual coordinator or designees.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-050, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-050, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-050, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-060

    How do I request a public record?

    (1) All requests for inspection or copying made in person at a department office shall be made on a form substantially as follows:

    REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

    Date of Request . . . .

    Time of Request . . . .

    Name . . . .

    Address . . . .

    . . . .

    Description of Records:

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    I understand that if a list of individuals is provided me by the Department of Ecology, it will neither be used to promote the election of an official nor promote nor oppose a ballot proposition as prohibited by RCW 42.17.130 nor for commercial purposes nor give or provide access to material to others for commercial purposes as prohibited by RCW 42.17.260(9).

    I understand that I will be charged the amount necessary to reimburse the department’s cost for copying.

    . . . .

    Signature

    Number of pages to be copied

    . . . .

    Number of copies per page

    . . . .

    Charge per copy

    $

    . . . .

    Special copy work charge

    $

    . . . .

    Staff time charge

    $

    . . . .

    Total charge

    $

    . . . .

    (2) You may request records in person at a department of ecology office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.

    (3) If you make your request by mail, your request must contain the following information:

    (a) The name and address of the person making the request and the organization the person represents;

    (b) The time of day and calendar date on which the person wishes to inspect the public records;

    (c) A description of the public records requested;

    (d) A statement whether access to copying equipment is desired;

    (e) A phone number where the person can be reached in case the public records officer or designate needs to contact the person for further description of the material or any other reason.

    (f) A statement that the record will not be used for commercial purposes.

    (4) The department must receive all requests at least five business days before the requested date of inspection to allow the public records officer or designee to make certain the requested records are available and not exempt and, if necessary, to contact the person requesting inspection. The department will process all requests in a timely manner. However, large requests or requests for public records maintained offsite may require more than five business days to prepare. The department will respond to your request within five business days of receiving it, by either:

    (a) Providing the record;

    (b) Acknowledging that the department has received the request and providing a reasonable estimate of the time the department will require to respond to the request; or

    (c) Denying the public record request.

    Additional time required to respond to a request may be based upon the need to clarify the intent of the request, to locate and assemble the information requested, to notify third persons or agencies affected by the request, or to determine whether any of the information requested is exempt and that a denial should be made as to all or part of the request. In acknowledging receipt of a public record request that is unclear, the department may ask the requestor to clarify what information the requestor is seeking. If the requestor fails to clarify the request, the agency need not respond to it.

    (5) The department may in its discretion fill requests made by telephone or facsimile copy (fax).

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-060, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-060, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-060, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-060, filed 1/17/78.]

    ————————————————————————————–

    WAC 173-03-070

    How much will it cost me to view a public record?

    The department does not charge a fee for the inspection of public records. The department will charge an amount necessary to reimburse its costs for providing copies of records. This amount shall be reviewed from time to time by the department, and shall represent the costs of providing copies of public records and for use of the department’s copy equipment, including staff time spent copying records, preparing records for copying, and restoring files. This charge is the amount necessary to reimburse the department for its actual costs for copying and is payable at the time copies are furnished. The charge for special copy work of nonstandard public records shall reflect the total cost, including the staff time necessary to safeguard the integrity of these records.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-070, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-070, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-070, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-070, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————-

    WAC 173-03-080

    What happens when the department denies a public records request?

    When the department refuses, in whole or part, a request for inspection of any public record, it must include a statement of the specific exemption authorizing the refusal and a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record withheld.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-080, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-080, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————-

    WAC 173-03-090

    What do I do if I object to the department’s denial to review a public record?

    (1) Any person who objects to the refusal of a request for a public record may petition for prompt review of that decision by submitting a written request for review. The written request shall specifically refer to the written statement by the public records officer or designee which constituted or accompanied the refusal.

    (2) Immediately after receiving a written request for review of a decision denying a public record, the public records officer or other staff member denying the request shall refer it to the director or the director’s delegate. The director or delegate shall immediately consider the matter and either affirm or reverse the refusal. The final decision shall be sent to the objecting person within two business days following receipt of the petition for review.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-090, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-090, filed 1/17/78.]

    ————————————————————————

    WAC 173-03-100

    How does the department protect public records?

    In order to adequately protect the public records of the department, you must comply with the following guidelines while inspecting public records:

    (1) You may not remove any public record from the department’s premises.

    (2) You must have a designated department employee present while you are inspecting a public record.

    (3) You may not mark or deface a public record in any manner during inspection.

    (4) You may not dismantle public records which are maintained in a file or jacket, or in chronological or other filing order, or those records which, if lost or destroyed, would constitute excessive interference with the department’s essential functions.

    (5) Access to file cabinets, shelves, vaults, or other storage areas is restricted to department personnel, unless other arrangements are made with the public records officer or designee.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-100, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-100, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-100, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-100, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————-

    The bottom line…..

    THE WA STATE  DEPT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) CHANGES TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS  A MONEY DEAL.

    JAN 20, 2013 “ECOLOGY SUCKS” WAS MY  PUBLISHED OPINION AND ON SEPT 22, 2017  I’M STICKING WITH IT!


  • Fixing Too Big to Fail 2008-2017

    OBAMACARE CAN BE CERTAINLY BE COMPARED TO ANOTHER DEMOCRATS’ TOO BIG TO FAIL ACT

    Comment on “TOO BIG TO FAIL” seven years ago

    Is it possible for taking care of financial crisis by allowing each state to work on their own because each state has different needs?

    and they could spot the problem easier and can easily find the solution.

    ? Solving the Global financial Crisis is so complex. I have no idea what the solutions is going to be.

     THE BOAT HAS TOO MUCH WATER ON IT AND ITS ON THE DANGER ZONE. WE MAY HAVE TO ALLOW THE BOAT SINK AND LET THEM SWIM OUT OF IT.

    http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/economy/the-true-cost-of-the-bank-bailout/3309/

    —————————————————————————————

    OBAMACARE IS TOO BIG TO FAIL AND IT’S TOO BIG. (financial experts say)

    OBAMACARE,  THE PATIENT PROTECTION AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, TOOK EFFECT ON MARCH 23, 2010 IT IMMEDIATELY CAUSED A SHARP PARTISAN DIVISION. THIS STAGGERINGLY LARGE LEGISLATION et al. —2,300 PAGES.

    IT PASSED WITHOUT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE.

    ———————————————————————————

    JULY 21, 2010 THE “TOO BIG TO FAIL”ACT

    THE DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT TOOK EFFECT ON JULY 21, 2010, IT IMMEDIATELY CAUSED A SHARP PARTISAN DIVISION. THIS STAGGERINGLY LARGE LEGISLATION—2,300 PAGES—

    IT PASSED THE HOUSE WITHOUT A SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE AND RECEIVED ONLY THREE GOP VOTES IN THE SENATE.

    ———————————————————————————-

    * Note, the term “Too Big to Fail” was coined with regard to TARP (the bail out of big banks)  A program of Obama’s  U. S. government to purchase toxic assets and equity from financial institutions. In 2010 the Democrats TARP, had lent, spent or guaranteed as much as $12.8 trillion for toxic assets.

    ———————————————————–

    OBAMACARE AND DODD-FRANK –TARP…… IMMEDIATELY CAUSED A SHARP PARTISAN DIVISION (these are too big to fail comments)

    Jun 20, 2009But if a company IS TOO BIG TO FAIL, SHOULD IT BE CONSIDERED TOO BIG TO EXIST … THEY WILL LOSE MONEY EVEN IF THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO STEP IN

    Oct 15, 2009 Greenspan said what I HAVE HEARD MANY OTHER CREDIBLE FINANCIAL EXPERTS SAY, NAMELY … GREENSPAN: “IF THEY’RE TOO BIG TO FAIL, THEY’RE TOO BIG

    OBAMACARE IS TOO BIG TO FAIL AND IT’S TOO BIG, AND OBAMCARE  SHOULD IT BE CONSIDERED TOO BIG TO EXIST. (financial experts say)

    2008-2017 THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS THINGS ABOUT ADDRESSING OBAMACARE IN CONGRESS

     OBAMACARE SHOULD IT BE REPEALED BECAUSE IT’S TOO BIG TO EXIST AND NO MATTER WHO STEPS IN, HARD WORKING AMERICAN TAXPAYERS WILL LOSE MONEY.

    * Nov 9, 2014 Gruber said, it passed because of ‘The Stupidity of The American Voter

    ————————————————————————————

    NOV 8, 2016 AMERICA’S HARD WORKING CITIZEN’S VOTED FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP TO REPEAL OBAMACARE!

    1. OBAMCARE IS TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL
    2. OBAMACARE IS TOO BIG TO EXIST
    3. OBAMACARE IS A REALLY BIG DEMOCRAT’S DISASTER.
    4. AND REALLY, OBAMACARE IS TOO BIG REPEAL?
    5. AND OBAMACARE IS TOO BIG TO PASS BECAUSE OF OBAMA’S 100% DEMOCRAT’S HOLDING OUT IN CONGRESS?

    EVERYBODY IN CONGRESS LEFT AND RIGHT AGREES,  to disagree on everything, SOME SAY IT GOES TOO FAR, WHILE OTHERS ARGUE IT DOES NOT GO FAR ENOUGH, BUT NO MATTER WHO STEPS IN AND COMPROMISES,  AMERICA’S HARDWORKING TAXPAYERS WILL BE THE BIGGEST LOSERS  WITH OBAMACARE.

    THAT IS WHY OBAMACARE MUST BE REPEALED, BECAUSE IT CAN’T BE FIXED. period

    ——————————————————————————–

    PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS MORE THEN ONE WAY TO FIX OBAMACARE.

    President Donald Trump on Tuesday declared that Republicans should “let Obamacare fail,” saying the collapse would force Democrats to work with the GOP

    Whether they repeal Obamacare immediately or not, Trump has said Democrats would be forced to come to the table to negotiate with Republicans on a path forward for the nation’s healthcare system.

    —————————————————-

    My favorite… how to fix OBAMACARE

    THE BOAT HAS TOO MUCH WATER IN IT AND IT’S IN THE DANGER ZONE. WE MAY HAVE TO ALLOW THE BOAT TO SINK AND LET THE DEMOCRATS SWIM THEIR WAY OUT OF IT.

    ——————————————————————————

    SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 WE ALL KNOW ABOUT TARP? OR NOT?

    THE TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM (TARP) IS A PROGRAM OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO PURCHASE TOXIC ASSETS AND EQUITY FROM FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO …

    ——————————————————————–

    SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 WE ALL KNOW ABOUT TARP,  THE TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM, which spent $700 billion in taxpayers’ money to bail out banks after the financial crisis. According to a team at Bloomberg News, at one point last year ( 2010) THE U.S. HAD LENT, SPENT OR GUARANTEED AS MUCH AS $12.8 TRILLION to rescue the economy.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    2008-2016 HARD WORKING AMERICAN VOTERS WATCHED, THEY LOOKED AT THE CONGRESSIONAL DEBACLES, OBAMA’S COLLUSION WITH HIS DEMOCRAT ADMINISTRATORS, THE LAWLESS IMMIGRATION, CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS, TERRORISM, THE WHITE HOUSE SUPPORT OF THE WHAT DO WE WANT “DEAD COPS”PROTESTORS, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION SCANDAL.

    AND, THEY LOOKED AT AMERICAS $20,000,000,000,000.00 TRILLION DOLLAR PERPETUAL DEBT OF THE DEAD. (NEARLY HALF WAS ACCUMULATED BETWEEN 2008 AND 2016 DURING OBAMA’S RULE)

    THE TWO DEMOCRATS “TOO BIG TO FAIL LAWS” OBAMACARE AND DODD-FRANK, TO SCRAP THEM ENTIRELY AND START OVER, QUICKLY BECAME  A PRIME WINNING POINT EARLY IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN.

    JUN 16, 2015 -DONALD J.TRUMP ANNOUNCED HIS  RUN FOR PRESIDENT

    A PATRIOTIC AMERICA CITIZEN STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE AND SAID, AMERICA FIRST.

    THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS TOO BIG TO FAIL.

     ————————————————————————-

    2015 A profound Canadian comment

    Without America there is no free world

    Without Trump there is no America.

     ———————————————————————————

    JUN 16, 2015 DONALD J. TRUMP HAD A PLAN TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

    NOV 8, 2016, PATRIOTIC HARD WORKING AMERICA CITIZEN’S STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE AND VOTED FOR  “DONALD J. TRUMP” AMERICA FIRST.

    WE THE PEOPLE, ONLY HAVE ONE COUNTRY THAT WE LOVE AND, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS TOO BIG TO FAIL.

    NOV 8, 2016 AMERICA’S HARD WORKING CITIZEN’S VOTED FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP TO REPEAL OBAMACARE!

    ————————————————————————-

    THE ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS PLANNED A BIG WIN BY  RESTING ON THEIR LAURELS

    LAURA’S INDEED, RESTING ON ONE’S LAURELS, TO BE SATISFIED WITH DISTINCTION WON BY PAST ACHIEVEMENTS AND CEASE TO STRIVE FOR FURTHER ACHIEVEMENTS

    ———————————————————————————

    THE DEMOCRATS AND SOCIALISTS HAD HILLARY AND BERNIE

    FROM 2008-2016 EVEN WITH NO VIABLE LEADERSHIP IN THE WHITE HOUSE,  THERE WAS NO QUESTION ON HOW TO WIN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, IT WAS ALREADY FIXED WITH  A SURE WIN FOR HILLARY. NO WORRIES

    ———————————————————–

    Moving  BACK TO TO BIG TO FAIL

    April 2, 2014- the concept of being too big or too strategic to fail is alive and well.

    TOO BIG TO FAIL BANKS CAN KEEP YOUR MONEY IF THEY FAIL.

     ——————————————————————————

    07/31/2014 Big Banks Remind Us Why We Should Be Scared Three separate events in Washington Thursday served as reminders that America’s big banks continue to pose risks to college students, consumers, and taxpayers.

    ———————————————————————————-

    JUL 29, 2015 –  ‘Too Big to Fail’ Is Still a Problem. Here’s How D.C. Wants to End It.

    REMEMBER THIS WAS POSTED JULY 29, 2015

    The scariest thing about addressing “too-big-to-fail” banks is that there’s no dress rehearsal. For all the plans, simulations, and preparations, the only way to know that the problem of banks being excessively interconnected in the wider economy has been solved is when one of these banks fails — but doesn’t take the rest of the economy with it.

    Until that happens, elected officials and regulators are left to look back at the 2008 debacle and argue about whether they’ve put the pieces in place to keep it from happening again.

    Leaders in the world of financial regulation talk about how to pick up where Dodd-Frank left off — or how to scrap the law and start over entirely.

    But in the midst of that argument, this much is clear: These banks are as big, or bigger, than they ever have been.

    “THEY HAVE A POTENTIAL TO HAVE A CATASTROPHIC EFFECT,” says Thomas Hoenig, vice chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. “THEY ARE LARGER THAN THEY WERE AT THE LAST CRISIS.”

    That does not mean that there haven’t been attempts to mitigate the problem of banks being so large that they require a bailout. IN THE FIVE YEARS SINCE CONGRESS PASSED the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law,(OBAMA’S) regulators have implemented a suite of measures aimed at ensuring that the nation’s largest banks are sound and that, should they wobble, the economy won’t go with them.

    IN 2010 THE DEMOCRATS TWO “TOO BIG TO FAIL LAWS” BECAME LAW OBAMACARE AND DODD-FRANK

    AND WHAT WOULD I SAY, IF ANYONE ASK ME WHY, IN THE SEVEN YEARS SINCE THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS PASSED THEM,  THEY HAVEN’T BEEN REGULATED?

    ———————————————————————————–

    THANK GOD DONALD J. TRUMP WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON NOV 8, 2016

    Jan 20, 2017 DONALD J. TRUMP  TOOK OFFICE

    Trump pledged during the transition that rolling back regulations, particularly 2010 Dodd-Frank law, would be a priority of his administration.

    Feb 3, 2017 – Trump signed an executive order directing the Treasury secretary to consult with regulators about what needs to be done to fix the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and to report back. That report is due in four months.

     “We expect to be cutting a lot out of Dodd-Frank,” Trump said, after morning … that rolling back regulations, particularly 2010 Dodd-Frank law, would be a priority of … In its regulatory rollback, the administration has a willing partner in the … plans to reintroduce the Financial Choice Act in the coming weeks.

    ————————————————————————-

    Presidential Executive Order on Core Principles for Regulating the …

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/…/presidential-executive-order-core-principles-regulatin…

    Feb 3, 2017 – Presidential Executive Order on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System. EXECUTIVE ORDER … (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: … DONALD J. TRUMP.

    INDEED, FIVE DAYS EARLIER…..

    Too big to fail – It’s happening again – Business Insider

    www.businessinsider.com/too-big-to-fail-its-happening-again-2017-1

    JAN 29, 2017 TOO BIG TO FAIL IS RETURNING WITH A VENGEANCE. The same risk that major Wall Street banks posed in the 2008 crisis when they were too complex, …

    ————————————————————

    The bottom line on “TOO BIG TO FAIL” seven years ago

    SIMPLY PUT….

    Is it possible for taking care of financial crisis by allowing each state to work on their own because each state has different needs?

    and they could spot the problem easier and can easily find the solution.

    ? Solving the Global financial Crisis is so complex. I have no idea what the solutions is going to be.

     THE BOAT HAS TOO MUCH WATER ON IT AND ITS ON THE DANGER ZONE. WE MAY HAVE TO ALLOW THE BOAT SINK AND LET THEM SWIM OUT OF IT.

    ——————————————————————————

    My bottom line July 29, 2017 (seven years later)

    Solving the Obamacare and Global financial Crisis is so complex. I have no idea what the solutions are going to be.

    BUT, THIS IS MY FAVORITE SOLUTION TO OBAMACARE

    THE BOAT HAS TOO MUCH WATER IN IT AND IT’S IN THE DANGER ZONE. WE MAY HAVE TO ALLOW THE BOAT TO SINK AND LET THE DEMOCRATS SWIM THEIR WAY OUT OF IT.


  • The Foreign Corruption of the Clinton’s

    What Does “Anything of Value” Mean?
    Defined as a violation of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
     page 14 of a 130 page document (link Below)
     —————————————–
    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a critically important statute for combating CORRUPTION I.E. CRIMINAL- FRAUD  around the world.
    ———————————————-
     What Does
    “Anything of Value” Mean
    to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
     To the 311 million American Citizens affected by the Clinton’s corrupt foreign practices in the Clinton’s Pay to Play Foundation
    AND, the FBI criminal investigation into the  Hillary’s emails?
    —————————————————–

    What Does “Anything of Value” Mean to the Federal Bureau of Investigation? FBI Comey, reopened Hillary’s criminal email investigation., The  justification for reopening the  investigation? The Release of 650,000  Huma, Weiner and Hillary connected emails.

    ———————————————————–

    WHAT DOES
    “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN
    TO  THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  AND TO  312 MILLION AMERICAN CITIZENS ?
    —————————————————————-
    What Does “ANYTHING OF VALUE” and “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” Mean?
    To the Clinton Pay to Play Foundation?
    ———————————————————-
    Defined as a violation of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
     —————————–
    In enacting the FCPA, Congress recognized that bribes
    can come in many shapes and sizes—a broad range of unfair
    benefits—and so the statute prohibits the corrupt “offer,
    payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of
    any money, or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of
    the giving of anything of value to” a foreign official.
     ———————————-
    An improper benefit can take many forms. While
    cases often involve payments of cash(sometimes in the
    guise of “consulting fees” or “commissions” given through
    intermediaries),others have involved travel expenses and
    expensive gifts. Like the domestic bribery statute, the FCPA
    does not contain a minimum threshold amount for corrupt
    gifts or payments.
     ————————————
    In addition, a number of FCPA enforcement actions
    have involved the corrupt payment of travel and entertainment expenses. Both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) where these types of expenditures occurred in conjunction with other conduct reflecting systemic bribery or other clear indicia of corrupt intent
     ————————————
    Charitable Contributions
    Companies often engage in charitable giving as part
    of legitimate local outreach. The FCPA does not prohibit
    charitable contributions or prevent corporations from acting
    as good corporate citizens.Companies, however, cannot use the pretense of charitable contributions as a way to funnel bribes to government officials.
    ————————————————————————-
    WHAT DOES “ANYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN?
    TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) LORETTA LYNCH, EXERCISE DISCRETION IN DECIDING WHICH CASES PROMOTE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES AND JUSTIFY INVESTIGATION?
    ————————————-

    WHAT DOES “ANYTHING OF VALUE” AND “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN?

    TO DOJ LORETTA LYNCH IT MEANS PROTECTING THE FOREIGN  AND INTERNAL CORRUPTION OF  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY, THE CLINTON’S,  THE DEMOCRATS AND THE DNC. period
    ————————————————————————

    This is the 130 page resource guide to Foreign corruption I.E. criminal-fraud

    A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

    https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf

    Jan 16, 2015 – criminal/fraud/fcpa and www.sec.gov/spotlight/fcpa.shtml. … Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a critically important statute for combating corruption around the … Department, Agency, or Instrumentality of a Foreign Government.

    ————————————————————————————
    Just asking? Just Saying…read it… You decide.
    Law Enforcement Partners in  Corruption? Crime? or Conflict?
    —————————————————————–

    Law Enforcement Partners (page 5 of 130)

    Foreign corruption I.E. criminal-fraud 
    DOJ’s  FCPA Unit regularly works WITH the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to investigate potential FCPA violations.
    The FBI’s International Corruption Unit has primary responsibility for international corruption and fraud investigations and coordinates the FBI’s national FCPA enforcement program. The FBI also has a dedicated FCPA
    squad of FBI special agents (located in the Washington Field Office) that is responsible for investigating many, and providing support for all, of the FBI’s FCPA investigations.
    In addition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation regularly investigate potential FCPA violations.
    A number of other agencies are also involved in the fight against international
    corruption, including the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which has helped lead a number of FCPA investigation.
    ———————————————————————
    Foreign Corrupt Practices?
    If you see something, Say something….
    By E-Mail Report a FCPA Violation via Email to FCPA.Fraud@usdoj.gov
    —————————————————————————-

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | CRIMINAL-FRAUD | Department of …

    https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreigncorruptpracticesact

    Jul 20, 2016 – An Overview. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA”), was enacted for the purpose of …

    Contact us Regarding the FCPA By Mail Correspondence relating to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) may be sent to:U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Fraud Section
    ATTN: FCPA Coordinator Bond Building, 4th Floor 10th and Constitution Ave. NW
    Washington, DC 20530-0001By Fax Facsimile – 202-514-7021By E-Mail Report a FCPA Violation via Email to FCPA.Fraud@usdoj.gov

    U.S.C. sections amended‎: ‎15 U.S.C. ch. 2b § 7…
    Enacted by‎: ‎the 95th United States Congress
    Titles amended‎: ‎15 U.S.C.: Commerce and Tra…
    Statutes at Large‎: ‎91 Stat. 1494
    ————————————————————-
    Want more?
    The FCPA Unit maintains a “Spotlight on FCPA”
    section on SEC’s website at
    http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/
    fcpa.shtml
    . The website, which is updated regularly, provides general information about the Act, links to all SEC enforcement actions involving the FCPA, including both federal court actions and administrative proceedings, and contains other useful information

  • The Clinton’s Pay to Play Foundation

    THE CLINTON FOUNDATION Reminds me of the world’s oldest profession

    PROSTITUTION…..

    ALL IT TAKES TO “PAY AND PLAY” WITH THE CLINTON’S  ARE  PIMPS, JOHN’S AND PROSTITUTES ON AN INTERNATIONAL SCALE.

    Prostitution is illegal, often it is described as a “victimless crime”, or a “consensual crime”, BECAUSE IN THEORY, NO ONE PRESENT AT THE CRIME IS UNWILLING.

    ————————————————————————————-

    FBI RESTARTS THE CLINTON FOUNDATION “CORRUPTION” INVESTIGATION

    FBI CLINTON FOUNDATION PROBE FINDS ‘AVALANCHE’ OF CORRUPTION EVIDENCE AGAINST HER – BUT AGENTS FEAR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (DOJ) WILL STOP HILLARY FROM  GOING ON TRIAL

    THE FBI  HAS AT LEAST FOUR OTHER INVESTIGATIONS OPEN THAT INVOLVE THE CLINTONS AND THEIR CLOSE FRIENDS, AS WELL.

    WHY DOES THE FBI BOTHER WITH INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CLINTON’S?

    WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)  LORETTA LYNCH WILL NOT TAKE ACTION AND PROSECUTE UNDER US LAW?

    ———————————————————–

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | CRIMINAL-FRAUD | Department of …

    https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreigncorruptpracticesact

    Jul 20, 2016 – An Overview. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA“), was enacted for the purpose of …

    THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA”), was enacted for the purpose of making it unlawful for certain classes of persons and entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business.

    ——————————————————-

    WHO INVESTIGATES THE  CORRUPTION OF US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DOJ?

    PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. PERIOD

    ————————————————————————— 

    Giuliani: Hillary & Obama Have ‘Completely Corrupted’ the State Dept, DOJ

    Nov 03, 2016 10:33pm

    ———————————————————————————-

    The division of duty between the FBI and attorneys at the Justice Department is usually clear. FBI agents investigate cases and will offer recommendations on whether to bring charges. Justice officials ultimately make that call.

    ————————————————————————

    Herridge: Abedin Told FBI She Notified WH Every Time Clinton Changed Emails

    Fox News Insider – 2 days ago … Clinton aide Huma Abedin in legal jeopardy, Catherine Herridge reported. … every time Hillary Clinton changed her email address to make sure his device would accept it.

    ———————————————————————————-

    The Justice Department’s Hillary Investigation Reeks Of Corruption

    thefederalist.com/2016/09/23/the-hillary-investigation-reeks-of-corruption/

    Sep 23, 2016 – According to an Associated Press report, the Justice Department reached criminal immunity deals with three of Hillary Clinton’s close advisers …

    ———————————————————————————

    JUNE 28, 2016, DOJ LORETTA LYNCH MEETS WITH BILL CLINTON

    But in the case of the Clinton email server investigation, that norm was upended in June after Lynch and former president Bill Clinton met on Lynch’s plane in Phoenix, just as the inquiry was in its final stages. Lynch described the meeting as “primarily social,” but she soon pledged that she would accept the recommendations of the FBI on the Clinton email probe.

    JUL 5, 2016 – F.B.I., JAMES B. COMEYNO CHARGES HILLARY

    ———————————————————————————

    BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children …

    True Pundit‎ – 2 days ago NYPD sources said Weiner or Abedin stored all the emails in a massive Microsoft Outlook program on the laptop. … could have been accessed, printed, discussed, leaked, …

    ——————————————————————————–

    I VOTED FOR TRUMP BECAUSE

    THE CLINTON’S PAY TO PLAY IS ILLEGAL

    THE CLINTON’S PAY TO PLAY COULD BE DISMISSED BY OBAMA’S DEPT OF JUSTICE  AS A “VICTIMLESS CRIME”, OR A “CONSENSUAL CRIME”, BECAUSE IN THEORY, NO ONE PRESENT AT THE CRIME IS UNWILLING.

    OR, ALL OF CLINTON’S CRIMES COULD BE DISMISSED BY OBAMA’S DEPT OF JUSTICE 

    THE PAY TO PLAY AND ALL OF HILLARY’S LIES TO CONGRESS ABOUT HER 33,000 DELETED, BLEACHED EMAILS AND HER ILLEGAL PRIVATE BASEMENT SERVER……

    BECAUSE, EVERYONE PRESENT AT THE CLINTON CRIMES HAS BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY OR TAKEN THE 5TH?

    ———————————————————-

    A TRUMP RALLY VIDEO IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS

    LIVE STREAM: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN ATKINSON, NH 11/4/16. …

    Right Side Broadcasting – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/user/rightsideradio

    LIVE STREAM: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN ATKINSON, NH 11/4/16. … FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2016: Live streaming coverage of the Donald Trump rally in Atkinson, NH at the Atkinson Country Club. … LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Atkinson,…

    ————————————————————–

    The bottom line

    ONLY PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

    WILL DRAIN THE CORRUPT WA DC SWAMP.


  • Busting up the World Bank Monopoly

    THE INTERNATIONAL HOSTILITY CAUSED BY OBAMA AND KERRY

    BUSTING UP THE ROTHSCHILD’S EUROPEAN “WORLD BANK” MONOPOLY

    In 2013, A newly assertive Beijing felt that it had been unfairly treated for years by the United States.

    PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT INVITE CHINA TO JOIN THE AMERICAN-DRIVEN Trans-Pacific Partnership TRADE PACT, INSISTING THAT BEIJING SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO WRITE THE RULES FOR 21ST- CENTURY COMMERCE.

    OBAMA AND KERRY HAVE FAILED AMERICA’S INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSHIP ALIENATING 57 COUNTRIES, INCLUDING MOST OF OUR CLOSEST ALLIES.

     NOW TODAY OCT 22, 2016, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STANDS AT THE BRINK OF WAR WITH TWO OF AMERICA’S MOST THREATENING AND POWERFUL ADVERSARIES RUSSIA AND CHINA.

    VOTE FOR TRUMP, HE WILL MAKE AMERICA SAFE AND GREAT AGAIN.

    ELECT TRUMP AND HE WILL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO REGAIN THE TRUST AND SUPPORT OF AMERICA’S LOST ALLIES.

    —————————————————————————————–

    AN ALTERNATIVE TO?  OR A HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF THE WORLD BANKING SYSTEM?

    BRICS bank launched in China as alternative to World Bank, IMF …

    Jul 21, 2015 timesofindia.indiatimes.com › Business

    BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA AND SOUTH AFRICA (BRICS)

    THE FIVE BRICS COUNTRIES REPRESENT OVER 3.6 BILLION PEOPLE, OR HALF OF THE WORLD POPULATION COUNTRIES ENCOMPASS OVER 25% OF THE WORLD’S LAND COVERAGE.

    I hate to argue with CNN about money… money.cnn.com/2015/05/04

     But,  the rest of the story is Apr 15, 2015

    57 nations approved as founder members of China-led AIIB | South …

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION  SUFFERED A HUMILIATING DIPLOMATIC DEFEAT LAST SPRING WHEN MOST OF ITS CLOSEST ALLIES SIGNED UP FOR The CHINA-LED ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK (AIIB) INCLUDING BRITAIN, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA AND SOUTH KOREA. ALTOGETHER 57 COUNTRIES HAVE JOINED,

    LEAVING THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN ON THE OUTSIDE.

    —————————————————

    I’M VOTING FOR TRUMP.

    ——————————————————————————-

    Russia and China have had enough of western banking – May. 4, 2015

    money.cnn.com/2015/05/04/…/russia-approves-brics-reserve-bank-imf/

    ————————————————-

    THE “WORLD BANK”  OF  OBAMA’S WA DC ELITES’ THAT ALLOWED/CAUSED AMERICA TO DOUBLE IT’S NATIONAL DEBT TO $20 A TRILLION DOLLARS. THE DEBT IS NOW HIGHER THAN THE GDP.

    What do I know? I know how to READ, RESEARCH, CONNECT, DOCUMENT, POST AND DISSEMINATE.

    CNN REPORTS,  MAY 4, 2015 – RUSSIA AND CHINA ARE ONCE AGAIN SAYING, “TAKE THAT, AMERICA.” … aid THE BRICS NATIONS: BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA CHINA AND SOUTH AFRICA.Member FDIC ….. The BRICS countries make up 40% of the world’s population and about …

    —————————————————————————-

    IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY, IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY. period

    Russia and China buy tons of gold getting ready for dollar collapse …

    www.pravdareport.com/business/finance/17-05-2016/134444russia_china_gold-0/

    May 17, 2016 – Russia and China have been buying tons of gold recently as experts … but in the summer of 2015, the country doubled its appetite for the precious metal. … THAT CHINA’S ENORMOUS GOLD RESERVES MAY CRUSH THE US CURRENCY. …. THE ROTHSCHILD BANKING SYSTEM, SO WORSHIPED BY WESTERN ELITES’, is ripe for a …

    ————————————————————————————-

    THE ROTHSCHILD WORLD BANKING SYSTEM, SO WORSHIPED BY WESTERN ELITES’?

    READ ALL ABOUT IT….

    IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY, IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY. period

    WE OWN AMERICA

    Posted on October 21, 2016 8:03 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    WE OWN YOUR NEWS, THE MEDIA, YOUR OIL AND YOUR GOVERNMENT

    You have probably never heard of me

    —————————————————————————————

    OCT 22, 2016,  You have probably never heard of me either…

    However, if a concerned American Grandmother sets up a website, behindmyback.org, and the government audits your Social Security, than you know “SOMEBODY” has heard of you.

    —————————————————————————————–

    I hate to argue with CNN about money… But..

    (BRICS)  is not alone in Busting up the World Piggy Bank,

    The History of (BRICS)  starts with the Birth of  The China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) In late 2007

    WHO ARE THESE BANKS?  What is the connection between BRICS and the China Led AIIB?

    THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF BOTH BANKS IS SAME I.E.,

    ALTERNATIVE TO THE EXISTING AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN DOMINATED WORLD BANK , I.E. THE ROTHSCHILD EUROPEAN BANKING SYSTEM AND THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND  (IMF).

    THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BANKS  IS AIIB OPERATES IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION BUT NEW DEVELOPMENT BANK OPERATIONS CONCENTRATE MORE IN BRICS NATIONS.

    WHAT IS THEIR GLOBAL AGENDA?

    ALTERNATIVE TO?  OR A HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF THE WORLD BANKING SYSTEM

    In 2013, A newly assertive Beijing felt that it had been unfairly treated for years by the United States.

    PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT INVITE CHINA TO JOIN THE AMERICAN-DRIVEN Trans-Pacific Partnership TRADE PACT, INSISTING THAT BEIJING SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO WRITE THE RULES FOR 21ST- CENTURY COMMERCE.

    BUSTING UP THE MONOPOLY OF THE WORLD PIGGY BANK

    BRICS Development Bank won’t rival China-led AIIB, but complement …

    https://www.rt.com/business/250689-bricsaiib-imf-rival/

    RT Apr 17, 2015 – The BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), both seen as alternatives to US – led institutions, will not compete, but rather complement each other, said the head of the Central Bank of Russia Elvira Nabiullina. … “I don’t think there’s less …

    The (BRICS)  AND (AIIB), For this post,  I’ll just document  the 2013 thru Oct 22, 2016

    (this is not in chronological order)

    IT IS REPORTED, AS USUAL, AFTER THE FACT, BY THE GLOBAL NEWS MEDIA.

    WIKILEAKS THAT CNN IS  MEDIA AND $$$ CONTRIBUTING TO THE ESTABLISHMENTS  WA DC ELITES’

    ————————————————————————————

    Pardon the redundancy…. it provides expanded documentation

    Dec 5, 2015 The New York Times reported

    The Chinaled Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

     SHAKING UP THE WA DC BANKING ESTABLISHMENT?

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION  SUFFERED A HUMILIATING DIPLOMATIC DEFEAT LAST SPRING WHEN MOST OF ITS CLOSEST ALLIES SIGNED UP FOR THE BANK, INCLUDING BRITAIN, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA AND SOUTH KOREA. ALTOGETHER 57 COUNTRIES HAVE JOINED, LEAVING THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN ON THE OUTSIDE.

    ———————————————————————————

    57 nations approved as founder members of China-led AIIB | South …

    www.scmp.com › News › China › Diplomacy & Defence

    South China Morning Post (global)

    Apr 15, 2015 – The Chinaled Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has officially approved 57 nations as prospective founding members, with Sweden, …Poland and Portugal are among the latest batch of countries to get approval for membership

    China Creates a World Bank of Its Own, and the U.S. Balks – The New …

    www.nytimes.com/…/chinacreates-an-asian-bank-as-the-us-stan…

    The New York Times

    DEC 5, 2015 – In setting up the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, China enlisted American allies, including Britain, even as Washington expressed skepticism. … The enthusiasm didn’t last long, as the Obama administration began a rear-guard battle to minimize the bank’s influence. In setting up the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, China enlisted American allies, including Britain, even as Washington expressed skepticism.

    By JANE PERLEZ DEC. 4, 2015 THE NEW YORK TIMES

    OCTOBER 2013 BEIJING — As top leaders met at a lush Bali resort in OCTOBER 2013, President Xi Jinping of China described his vision for a new multinational, multibillion-dollar bank to finance roads, rails and power grids across Asia. UNDER CHINESE STEWARDSHIP

    Afterward, THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE, JOHN KERRY, caught up with Mr. Xi in the corridor. “That’s a great idea,” Mr. Kerry said of the bank, according to Chinese and American aides briefed on the encounter.

    The enthusiasm didn’t last long, as the Obama administration began a rear-guard battle to minimize the bank’s influence.

    The United States worries that China will use the bank to set the global economic agenda on its own terms…

    When Mr. Xi was named president IN 2013, Mr. Zheng and his new colleagues saw a chance to revive the plan. The think tank, the China Center for International Economic Exchanges, thought the bank played to Mr. Xi’s nationalistic strategy.

    In 2013, A newly assertive Beijing felt that it had been unfairly treated for years by the United States.

    PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT INVITE CHINA TO JOIN THE AMERICAN-DRIVEN Trans-Pacific Partnership TRADE PACT,  INSISTING THAT BEIJING SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO WRITE THE RULES FOR 21ST- CENTURY COMMERCE.

    ———————————————————————————

    WOW… The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

    ALTOGETHER 57 COUNTRIES HAVE JOINED, (AIIB)

    LEAVING THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN ON THE OUTSIDE.

    Final list of 57 founding members of the AIIB

    Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Brazil, Brunei, Cambodia

    China, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany

    Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kazakhstan

    Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta

    Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway

    Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea

    Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden

    Switzerland, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey, UAE, United Kingdom

    Uzbekistan and Vietnam

    ————————————————————————–

    International Advisory Panel Holds Inaugural Meeting

    News release, October 19, 2016

    WHO ARE THESE  57 COUNTRIES, PEOPLE? WHAT IS THEIR GLOBAL AGENDA?

    A HOSTILE GLOBAL TAKEOVER OF THE WORLD BANKING SYSTEM?

    AND, THERE IS NOT A SINGLE AMERICAN CITIZEN ON THE INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL. period.

    Member

    Biography

    Mr. Shaukat Aziz

    Former Prime Minister of Pakistan

    Dr. Zeti Akhtar Aziz

    Former Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, Malaysia’s Central Bank

    Mr. Anders Borg

    Former Finance Minister of Sweden

    Mr. Yukio Hatoyama

    Former Prime Minister of Japan

    Mr. Steve Howard

    Secretary General of the Global Foundation

    Dr. Oh-Seok Hyun

    Chair Professor of the Korea National Diplomatic Academy and
    Former Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategy and Finance of Korea.

    Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala

    Senior Advisor, Lazard; Former Finance Minister, Nigeria; Former Managing Director, World Bank

    Ms. Emilia Pires

    Former Finance Minister of Timor-Leste

    Mr. Paul Speltz

    Former U.S. Ambassador, Chairman and CEO of Global Strategic Associates

    Lord Nicholas Stern

    Professor at the London School of Economics, Former Chief Economist of the World Bank

    Mr. Tung Chee-Hwa

    Former Chief Executive of Hong Kong SAR

    What is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank? – AIIB

    www.aiib.org/html/aboutus/AIIB/

    The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a multilateral development bank (MDB) conceived for the 21st century. Through a participatory process, its founding members are developing its core philosophy, principles, policies, value system and operating platform.

    ——————————————————

    IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, SHALL AMERICAN VOTERS DECIDE THAT EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AS ONE OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC EXCHANGES, NOT BE ALLOWED TO WRITE THE GLOBALIZATION RULES FOR 21ST-CENTURY COMMERCE?

    IN FACT  Jun 23, 2016THE U.K. VOTED TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION,

    Behind My Back | Brexit the EU – What’s Next Amexit the UN?

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/07/13/brexit-the-euwhatsnextamexit-the-un/

    Jul 13, 2016 – time.com/4381042/leave–eu-referendum-brexit–vote/. Time. Jun 24, 2016 – The U.K. has voted to leave the European Union, a surprise result …

    —————————————————-

     CHINA, WITH ITS VAST WEALTH AND RESOURCES, NOW RIVALS THE UNITED STATES AT THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC TABLE

    For the year 2013, China for the first time surpassed $4 trillion of world trade and become as world’s largest trading country, consist of: export $2.21 trillion and import $1.95 trillion.

    While the United States for 11 months of 2013 world trade figure totaling $3.5 trillion and seems cannot beat China. China world trade balance in 2013 surplus by almost $260 billion a 12.8 percent increased from last year.[35]

    THE FIVE BRICS COUNTRIES REPRESENT OVER 3.6 BILLION PEOPLE, OR HALF OF THE WORLD POPULATION COUNTRIES ENCOMPASS OVER 25% OF THE WORLD’S LAND COVERAGE.

    ——————————————————————————–

    IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY, IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY. period

    Russia and China buy tons of gold getting ready for dollar collapse …

    www.pravdareport.com/business/finance/17-05-2016/134444russia_china_gold-0/

    May 17, 2016 – Russia and China have been buying tons of gold recently as experts … but in the summer of 2015, the country doubled its appetite for the precious metal. … THAT CHINA’S ENORMOUS GOLD RESERVES MAY CRUSH THE US CURRENCY. …. THE ROTHSCHILD BANKING SYSTEM, SO WORSHIPPED BY WESTERN ELITES’, is ripe for a …

    ———————————————————————————-

    Russia and China have had enough of western banking – May. 4, 2015

    money.cnn.com/2015/05/04/…/russia-approves-brics-reserve-bank-imf/

    CNNMoney

    May 4, 2015 – Russia and China are once again saying, “Take that, America.” … aid the BRICS nations: Brazil, Russia, India China and South Africa.Member FDIC ….. The BRIC countries make up 40% of the world’s population and about …

    Russia and China are once again saying, “Take that, America.”

    President Vladimir Putin approved a new $100 billion reserve fund over the weekend that will specifically aid the BRICS nations: Brazil, Russia, India China and South Africa.

    It’s another step by them to build so they don’t have to go to the United States or the International Monetary Fund for any financial help.

    The reserve fund will help BRICS countries with cash problems. It will get most of its seed funding from China, which will contribute $41 billion. Russia, India and Brazil will put in $18 billion each, and South Africa will give $5 billion. The timing is critical as many emerging market nations and businesses are struggling to pay their debt for various reasons.

    ———————————————————————–

    BRICS bank launched in China as alternative to World Bank, IMF …

    timesofindia.indiatimes.com › Business

    The Times of India

    Jul 21, 2015 – BRICS bank launched in China as alternative to World Bank, IMF … BRICS economies — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa … Each BRICS member will contribute an equal share in establishing a startup capital.

    BRICS IS THE ACRONYM FOR AN ASSOCIATION OF FIVE MAJOR EMERGING NATIONAL ECONOMIES: BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA AND SOUTH AFRICA. … The WORLD BANK expects BRICS growth to pick up to 5.3% in 2017.

    IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY, IT’S ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY. period

    ————————————————————————–

    THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF BOTH BANKS IS SAME I.E.,

    THE INTERNATIONAL HOSTILITY CAUSED BY OBAMA AND KERRY