+menu-


  • Category Archives Hillary Almost got away with it
  • Who Elected Donald Trump President?

    JULY 2, 2017 AT THIS POINT IN TIME…. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

    Texan’s billboard slams ABC News: ‘Russians didn’t elect Donald …

    www.theamericanmirror.com/texas-billboard-slams-abc-news-supports-trump/

    Jun 23, 2017 – We are through. THE RUSSIANS DIDN’T ELECT DONALD TRUMP. I DID. Kyle Courtney. Courtney elaborated on the message in a statement to the news …

    ———————————————————————————-

    WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

    THE BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK TAUGHT AMERICAN VOTERS A LESSON ABOUT OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON.

    BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 AND NOVEMBER 6, 2012,  WHEN OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED AS PRESIDENT

    THE TERRORIST SET THE U.S. MISSION IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA, ON FIRE ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2012. THE U.S. AMBASSADOR TO LIBYA, CHRISTOPHER STEVENS, AND THREE OTHER U.S. NATIONALS WERE KILLED DURING THE ATTACK.

    THE WA DC RESPONSE TO THE  SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK ON U.S. MISSION IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA, 56 DAYS BEFORE THE 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WAS CONTROLLED, RIGGED, BY THE COVER-UP AND LIES.

    INDEED, WA DC DEMOCRATS OBAMA, HILLARY AND TOP U.S. OFFICIALS DIRECTED THE COVER-UP,  DID ORCHESTRATE THE MEDIA LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DID ESPECIALLY SURREPTITIOUSLY ARRANGE, DID DIRECT THE ELEMENTS OF THE 2012 BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK TO CONTROL ..

    AND IN 2012 COVER-UP AND LIES  PRODUCED THE  DESIRED EFFECT,

    OBAMA WAS RE-ELECTED AS PRESIDENT

     AND HILLARY CLINTON,  CONTINUED PLOTTING HER 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN.

    ———————————————————————-

     SEP 11, 2016 At this point in time…. What difference does it make?

    What the Benghazi attack taught me about Hillary Clinton | Fox News

    www.foxnews.com/…/2016/09/…/what-benghazi-attack-taught-me-about-hillary-clinton….

    SEP 11, 2016 – Published September 11, 2016. Fox News … And the Benghazi record is clear: Secretary Clinton failed to provide adequate security for U.S. …

    ————————————————————————————–

    WHY AMERICAN VOTERS  ELECTED DONALD TRUMP PRESIDENT, IN 2016

    LESSONS LEARNED  FROM THE BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK 

    BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 AND NOVEMBER 8, 2016

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED

    ON THE DAY OF THE ATTACK, two consulate security guards spotted a man in a Libyan police uniform taking pictures of the consulate with his cell phone from a nearby building that was under construction. The security guards briefly detained the man before releasing him. He drove away in a police car and a complaint was made to the Libyan police station. Sean Smith noticed this surveillance, AND MESSAGED A FRIEND ONLINE AROUND NOON, “ASSUMING WE DON’T DIE TONIGHT. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.”[31]:34

    According to a local security official, he and a battalion commander had met with U.S. diplomats three days before the attack and warned the Americans about deteriorating security in the area. The official told CNN that he advised the diplomats, “THE SITUATION IS FRIGHTENING; IT SCARES US.”[62]

    AMBASSADOR STEVENS’ DIARY, WHICH WAS LATER FOUND AT THE COMPOUND, RECORDED HIS CONCERN ABOUT THE GROWING AL-QAEDA PRESENCE IN THE AREA AND HIS WORRY ABOUT BEING ON AN AL-QAEDA HIT LIST.[63]

    U.S. security officer Eric Nordstrom twice requested additional security for the mission in Benghazi from the State Department. His requests were denied and according to Nordstrom, State Department official Charlene Lamb wanted to keep the security presence in Benghazi “artificially low”.[64]

    —————————————————————————————————————-

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED 

    In the days and weeks following the attack, President Obama and other administration officials noted that the video had sparked violent incidents at a number of U.S. diplomatic facilities and stated it was also a prime catalyst for the Benghazi attack.

     On the evening following the attack, in an e-mail to the Egyptian prime minister Kandil, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote “we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest.”[122]

    Two days after the attack, CNN reporter Sarah Aarthun quoted an anonymous senior U.S. administration official: “It was not an innocent mob. The video or 9/11 made a handy excuse and could be fortuitous from their perspective but this was a clearly planned military-type attack.”[123]

    In his September 18 appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman, President Obama said, “extremists and terrorists used (the anti-Muslim YouTube video) as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies.”[124] In his Univision Town Hall appearance on September 20, President Obama said that the “natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests.”[125]

    ————————————————————————

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED 

    NINE MONTHS BEFORE THE  TERRORIST ATTACK ON U.S. GOVERNMENT FACILITIES IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA,  killed four American officials, including ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, the State Department dispatched a security officer to assess the threat there.

    In an interview with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, the officer recounted his report to a superior at State, then under the direction of Secretary Hillary Clinton:

    I told him that this was a suicide mission; that there was a very good chance that everybody here was going to die; that there was absolutely no ability here to prevent an attack whatever. . . . He said, “Everybody back here in D.C. knows that people are going to die in Benghazi and nobody is going to care until somebody does die.”

    ————————————————————————————-

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED 

    On December 30, 2012, the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs released a report, “Flashing Red: A Special Report on the Terrorist Attack at Benghazi”, wherein it was determined:

    EIGHT MONTHS LEADING UP TO THE  TERRORIST ATTACK ON U.S. GOVERNMENT FACILITIES IN BENGHAZI, LIBYA……….

    IN THE MONTHS [BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 AND SEPTEMBER 11, 2012] leading up to the attack on the Temporary Mission Facility in Benghazi, there was a large amount of evidence gathered by the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) and from open sources that Benghazi was increasingly dangerous and unstable, and that a significant attack against American personnel there was becoming much more likely.

    WHILE THIS INTELLIGENCE WAS EFFECTIVELY SHARED WITHIN THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC) AND WITH KEY OFFICIALS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

     it did not lead to a commensurate increase in security at Benghazi nor to a decision to close the American mission there, either of which would have been more than justified by the intelligence presented. …

    THE RSO [REGIONAL SECURITY OFFICER] IN LIBYA COMPILED A LIST OF 234 SECURITY INCIDENTS IN LIBYA BETWEEN JUNE 2011 AND JULY 2012, 50 OF WHICH TOOK PLACE IN BENGHAZI.[65]

    ———————————————————————————–

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED 

    SECRETARY CLINTON IN HER JANUARY 2013 TESTIMONY BEFORE CONGRESS, CLAIMED SECURITY DECISIONS AT THE BENGHAZI COMPOUND HAD BEEN MADE BY OTHERS, STATING,

     “THE SPECIFIC SECURITY REQUESTS PERTAINING TO BENGHAZI … WERE HANDLED BY THE SECURITY PROFESSIONALS IN THE [STATE] DEPARTMENT.

     I DIDN’T SEE THOSE REQUESTS, I DIDN’T APPROVE THEM, I DIDN’T DENY THEM.”[68]

    —————————————————————————————-

    Senate Hearing Benghazi Consulate Attack, Jan 23 2013 | C-SPAN.org

    ▶ 2:33:05

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?310496-1/senate-hearing-benghazi…

    Jan 23, 2013

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies on the September 11, 2012, … Senate Hearing on Benghazi

    ————————————————————————————

    Hillary Clinton at Benghazi Hearing: ‘What Difference, At This Point …

    ▶ 1:09

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka0_nz53CcM

    May 13, 2013 – Uploaded by Joe Bunting

    Hillary’s quote, “What difference, at this point, does it make” has been … is why it was originally

    ———————————————————————–

    Hannity Shows Obama Admin Falsely Blaming Video for Benghazi

    freebeacon.com/…/hannity-plays-montage-of-obama-administration-members-falsely-…

    OCT 23, 2015Sean Hannity played a montage of Obama administration officials, including Hillary Clinton, falsely casting blame for the Benghazi terrorist …

    —————————————————————————-

    WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED 

    TUESDAY JUNE 28, 2016

    The Select Committee issued its long-awaited report on TUESDAY JUNE 28,2016. In many ways, it is a disappointment — an outcome guaranteed by Obama administration stonewalling, abetted by congressional Democrats’ tireless interference. The committee held few public hearings to hold officials accountable, and major questions it was created to examine remain unanswered:

    Tuesday, Jun 28, 2016Benghazi Committee Releases Final Report. … House Republicans on the Benghazi Select Committee released their longawaited report this morning … They issued their own findings Monday: a 339-page report that they say …

    the report is a devastating account of staggering dereliction of duty and deception by the president and his top subordinates. Front and center in every phase of this disgraceful episode is Mrs. Clinton, whose appalling judgment and character flaws are amply illustrated in its pages.
    ——————————————————————————-

    TUESDAY JUNE 28,2016

    Benghazi Scandal Coverup — Clinton & Obama Administration Owe …

    www.nationalreview.com/…/benghazi-scandal-coverup-clinton-obama-administration…

    Jun 28, 2016 – THE BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK OCCURRED 56 DAYS BEFORE THE 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. IN HIS CAMPAIGN FOR REELECTION, President Obama repeatedly declared that … Clinton herself clearly knew it was a lie: As the committee report …

    POLITICS CONTROLLED THE RESPONSE TO THE ATTACK — TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE WAS A RESPONSE.

     The State Department officials were made aware that the White House was very concerned about the politics. CLINTON, ALREADY PLOTTING HER 2016 CAMPAIGN, HAD SIMILAR WORRIES, given her portrayal of post-Qaddafi Libya as an Arab Spring success story where a stable, representative government was taking shape.

     

    The Benghazi terrorist attack occurred 56 days before the 2012 presidential election. The attack on the facility, which Obama was briefed on by top Defense Department officials shortly after it began, threatened to destroy the president’s campaign claims.

    In his campaign for reelection, President Obama repeatedly declared that the killing of Osama bin Laden signaled the defeat of al-Qaeda and its network of affiliates

    ————————————————————————–

     WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED  Jul 3, 2016

    From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer – Patrick.net

    https://patrick.net/?p=1292815&c=1301938

    Jul 3, 2016http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/06/trackingthe-clintoncontroversies-from-whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/. A what, when, who …

    ——————————————————————————–

    UPDATE ? WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS  LEARNED  NOV 6, 2016

    From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Primer on Bill and Hillary Clinton …

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/…the-clinton…whitewater-to-benghazi/396182/

    NOV 6, 2016From Whitewater to Benghazi: A ClintonScandal Primer. In a letter on Sunday, FBI Director James Comey wrote that newly discovered emails …

    ——————————————————————————————-

    JULY 2, 2017 AT THIS POINT IN TIME…. CLEARLY AND SIMPLY PUT

    THE RUSSIANS DIDN’T ELECT DONALD TRUMP

    AMERICAN VOTERS DID!

     


  • Understanding the Intent of a Party

    Understanding the Intent of a Party

    June 8, 2017, Do you understand the intent of FBI Comey and the WA DC Establishment?

    Did you understand the intent of  Donald J. Trump when he ran for president and his intent  as President of the U.S.A.?

    ——————————————————————————-

     THE INTENT OF A PARTY

    CAN BE DETERMINED BY EXAMINING THE UNDERSTANDING OF A REASONABLE PERSON,

    AFTER CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

     INCLUDING  THE NEGOTIATIONS,

    ANY PRACTICES THE PARTIES HAVE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THEMSELVES,

    USAGES  AND ANY SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    —————————————————————————

    I AM A REASONABLE PERSON AND I DO UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP.

    ————————————————————————————

    DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE INTENT  OF  OBAMA’S LEFTOVERS, THE LIBERAL’S FAKE NEWS MEDIA, THE LIARS, THE LEAKERS, THE WA DC ESTABLISHMENT,  THE INTENT OF FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH ON THE TARMAC ET AL  AND  AMERICAN JUSTICE?

    —————————————————————————-

     JUNE 8, 2017, DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF FBI JAMES COMEY’S TESTIMONY?

     DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH?

     OH DEAR WHAT CAN THE MATTER BE?

     FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY SAID FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL LORETTA LYNCH.

    DIRECTED HIM TO REFER TO THE HILLARY CLINTON EMAIL PROBE AS A “MATTER,” NOT AN INVESTIGATION.

     June 8, 2017 FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY TESTIFIED UNDER OATH,  WE HAD A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OPEN….

    COMEY SAID, THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE FBI’S INVESTIGATION INTO HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAILS. … , AND SO THAT GAVE ME A QUEASY FEELING.

     SO, QUEASY FEELING FBI COMEY FOLDED UNDER LORETTA LYNCH’S  PRESSURE AND CALLED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION  A “MATTER”

    —————————————————————–

    FEB 17, 2017 Judge Jeanine Pirro

    OBAMA ‘LEFTOVERS’ ARE BEHIND LEAKS AND MUST BE “PROSECUTED”

    SHE, DESCRIBED MEMBERS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AS “LIVID” AT TRUMP

    AND SAID THE LEAKS ARE RETALIATION. 

    June 8, 2017 FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY TESTIFYING ONE MONTH AFTER TRUMP FIRED HIM……

    ————————————————————————————–

    COMEY  THE FORMER FBI DIRECTOR’S ACKNOWLEDGED  THAT HE HAD ASKED A FRIEND TO LEAK HIS MEMOS ABOUT HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PRESIDENT.

     ONE MONTH AFTER TRUMP FIRED HIM…

    COMEY TOLD MEMBERS OF THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE THAT HE HAD HOPED TO PROD THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO APPOINT A SPECIAL COUNSEL TO OVERSEE THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, WHICH occurred last month

    ——————————————————————————————

    A RETALIATION LEAK BY  FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY ?

    —————————————————————————-

    Feb 17, 2017 Judge Jeanine Pirro weighed in this morning on President Donald Trump’s epic news conference and responded to the recent leaks of intelligence,

    Obama ‘Leftovers’ Are Behind Leaks and Must Be Prosecuted

    insider.foxnews.com/…/judge-jeanine-obama-admin-leftovers-are-behind-leaks-and-…

    Feb 17, 2017 – Fiery Judge Jeanine: Obama ‘Leftovers’ Are Behind Leaks and Must Be … Watch her analysis above and don’t miss Justice With Judge …

    PIRRO SAID SHE BELIEVES THE RUSSIA-RELATED LEAKS ARE COMING FROM OBAMA ADMINISTRATION “LEFTOVERS” AND THAT TRUMP MUST “PROSECUTE” THE LEAKERS.

    “This is classified information, serious stuff. … A lot of these people are very much embedded into the system and he has to find out who they are and that’s not gonna be easy,” said Pirro.

    SHE DESCRIBED MEMBERS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AS “LIVID” AT TRUMP

    AND SAID THE LEAKS ARE RETALIATION. 

    —————————————————————————

    President Trump’s personal attorney plans to file a complaint against fired FBI Director James B. Comey with the Justice Department over his leaking of memos on his conversations with the president, a source close to the president’s legal team said Friday.

    A complaint will be filed early next week with the Justice Department’s inspector general regarding the leak, and there will also be a “submission” to the Senate Judiciary Committee about Mr. Comey’s testimony before both Senate Judiciary and Senate Intelligence committees, the source said.

    —————————————————————————–

    The Trump team is also interested in Mr. Comey’s testimony on May 3, 2017 to the Senate Judiciary Committee, A WEEK BEFORE HE WAS FIRED, in which Chairman Charles Grassley, Iowa Republican, asked if the FBI director was ever the source of anonymous news articles.

    “Director Comey, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?” Mr. Grassley asked.

    “Never,” Mr. Comey said.

    ————————————————

    1. COMEY’S TESTIMONY ON MAY 3, 2017
    2. GRASSLEY ASKED IF THE FBI WAS INVESTIGATING LEAKS OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT OR HIS ASSOCIATES.

    “I DON’T WANT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION, SENATOR, FOR REASONS I THINK YOU KNOW,” MR. COMEY SAID AT THE TIME. “LEAKS ARE ALWAYS A PROBLEM, ESPECIALLY IN THE LAST THREE TO SIX MONTHS.”

    ————————————————————-

    THE INTENT OF OBAMA LIBERAL LEFTOVER LEAKERS AKA COMEY

    THESE LEAKS, AKA LEAKERS,  SOMETIMES OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION,

     ARE OFTEN TOLERATED, FACILITATED, OR ENCOURAGED

    BY MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT.

    THOSE IN POWER CAUGHT MISHANDLING OR RELEASING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

    FOR PERSONAL OR POLITICAL PURPOSES—

    AKA, HILLARY CLINTON AND WEINER TO A PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER—TYPICALLY EXPERIENCE MINIMAL CONSEQUENCES.

    ———————————————————————-

    UNDERSTANDING THE INTENT OF  DONALD J. TRUMP WHEN HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT, UNDERSTANDING  THE INTENT OF THE VOTERS THAT ELECTED HIM PRESIDENT AND HIS INTENT AS  PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    ——————————————————————————-

     THE INTENT OF A PARTY

    CAN BE DETERMINED BY EXAMINING

    THE UNDERSTANDING OF A REASONABLE PERSON,

    AFTER CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

    INCLUDING  THE NEGOTIATIONS,

    ANY PRACTICES THE PARTIES HAVE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THEMSELVES,

    USAGES  AND

    ANY SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

     —————————————————————————

    I AM A REASONABLE PERSON AND I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP ON LEAKERS.

    PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP  SHALL NOT TOLERATE, FACILITATE, OR ENCOURAGE THESE LEAKS, AKA LEAKERS,  OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, BY MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT.

    IN FACT  FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY WAS  A LEAKER.

    OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LEAKING “LEFTOVERS”  MUST BE “PROSECUTE”


  • FBI Comey Was Mildly Nauseous?

    Read the Rest of the Story… by Pearl Harvey

    HILLARY CLINTON ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

    No wonder Comey Was Mildly Nauseous….

    This documented comment is enough to gag a maggot

    Hilary Clinton did not swear an oath to tell the truth before meeting with the FBI for three and a half hours last weekend, and the interview was not recorded, FBI Director James Comey told House lawmakers on Thursday.

    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.

    ———————————————————
    June 3, 2014
    For decades, criminal investigators have known that the best way to obtain and preserve reliable information is to electronically record interviews and interrogations.
    And yet agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have continued to rely on handwritten notes taken during interrogations, which they later type onto so-called 302 forms.
     ——————————————
    That will finally change. In mid-May, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo instructing all federal investigative agencies—including the F.B.I., the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives—to use electronic recording while interviewing witnesses and suspects,
    EXCEPT IN CASES  INVOLVING NATIONAL SECURITY
    the new policy goes into effect on July 11th. 
    —————————————————————-
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.
     —————————————————————-
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ——————————————————

    May 3, 2017 – Comey said Wednesday that it makes him “mildly nauseous” to think his decision to reopen the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails just days before the election could have impacted voters, but added he would make the same choice again.

    “I faced a choice,” Comey said. “And I’ve lived my entire career by the tradition that if you can possibly avoid it, you avoid any action in the run-up to an election that might have an impact, whether it’s a dog-catcher election or president of the United States. But I sat there that morning and could not see a door labeled ‘no action here.'”

    In his most detailed explanation and strongest defense of his actions to date, Comey said it was a choice between “really bad and catastrophic” to inform lawmakers about the discovery of additional Clinton emails found on the computer of former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

    Comey said he had the choice to either “speak” or “conceal.” He called the decision — which quickly became public — “one of the world’s most painful experiences,” but said making it was the right move.

    ————————————————————

    FBI Memo

    www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20070402_FBI_Memo.pdf
    Apr 2, 2007 – Page 1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. Frecedauon ROUTINE ‘ Date: 3/23/2006. To: All Field Offices ittm ADIC, sac, and cm:.

    ————————————-

    Bill,

    online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf

    Mar 30, 2006 – Details: FBI policy on electronic recording of confessions and witness interviews is contained in a SAC Memorandum 22—99, dated 10 August …

    ————————————————————
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ————————————————————-
    Dated 3/17/06 Office of the General Council Investigative Law Unit
    ELECTRON RECORDING OF CONFESSIONS AND WITNESSES
    http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf
    This is a 54 page DOJ document
    with a hand written notation “SO WE WANT TO HIDE THE TRUTH? DON’T WANT JURY TO REACH IT’S OWN JUDGMENT?
    It is recognized there are many situations in which recording the subjects interview would be prudent…
    On a case-by-case opportunity to use this technique where and when it will be used to further the investigation and subsequent prosecution….
    ————————————————–
    Except in cases  LIKE HILLARY CLINTON’S involving national security
    —————————————————
    From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent;36 chains contained Secret information at the time
    ———————————————————————–
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

    Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing.

    Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

    After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

    This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.

    I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.

    So, first, what we have done:

    The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.

    Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

    Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.

    click on the link below to read the full text

    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of …

    https://www.fbi.gov/…/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-…

    Jul 5, 2016Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System. Remarks …

    In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.

    Opinions are irrelevant,  they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation.