+menu-


  • Category Archives Global Control
  • The Story of Us? The Collective History of Us?

    The Story of Us? The Collective History of Us?

    Morgan Freeman is doing “The Story of Us” in a six part television series. Starting tonight Wed Oct 11, 2017

    Morgan Freeman a multimillionaire, democrat, a black man from the south, that has  the wherewithal, the money and other means needed for a particular purpose,  his own agenda, based on his own perception and

    And, Morgan Freeman is telling “US”, mankind collectively, “The Story of Us”?

    Morgan Freeman’s voice is often regarded as Hollywood’s signature “VOICE OF GOD” and the actor has used it well. especially for endorsing…..

    ————————————————————————————-

    With all due respect, this is about motive not race.

    Morgan Freeman is an actor and entertainer…

    Please add this word to your vocabulary

    Intersubjectivity is observation of humility.

    Entertaining the thought that your thoughts are not the be all and end all of all reality…..

    Statistic intersubjectivity: A phenomenology of television audiences

    MAY 28, 2017/in Features, Spring 2017_#True Tags: audiences, phenomenology, television, Walter Benjamin

    Morgan Freeman Seeks What Unites Humankind

    Morgan Freeman travels the globe in search of an answer to one fundamental question for humanity: what are the common forces that bind us together?

    It Premieres Wednesday, October 11, 2017 on the National  Geographic channel, It’s a great place for learning, I watched a series of “Stranger Than Nature” for 6 hours yesterday.

    The TV ad for “The Story of Us” was repeated over and over and over…

    ——————————————————————————–

    Thus, with provoked anger and my  curiosity aroused

    First my anger,  the use of two collective words “US” and “WE” by progressive UN globalist democrats. Obama said,  it is not who “WE”  are

    I RESEARCH AND DOCUMENT

    The Story of US?

    Morgan Freeman is a Democrat

    Morgan Freeman’s voice is often regarded as Hollywood’s signature “VOICE OF GOD” and the actor has used it well. especially for endorsing…..

    Freeman endorsed Barack Obama’s candidacy for the 2008 presidential election

    CNN February 19, 2016 Morgan Freeman endorsed Clinton

    He doesn’t have any trust issues with Clinton. Freeman added, “I think this is just made-up stuff, just, you know, it’s political hogwash.”

     Freeman was also spotted getting dinner with President Barack Obama and actor Tom Hanks in Washington on Wednesday.

    Rich man? Morgan Freeman Net Worth? 2015 Estimated at $150,000,000 dollars

    Multimillionaire Actor Morgan Freeman traveled the globe in search of answers?

    I traveled the globe as a non-political tourist class American

     “The Story of Us” Morgan Freeman?

    Really, “The Story of Us” Is What Happened to us? “The Collective History of Us”

    Facts are Facts:  commonality, is  a sharing of features or characteristics in common; possession or manifestation of common attributes. 2. a feature or characteristic held in common :

    Historians perceive commonalities of behavior in many eras.

    WHAT HAPPENED TO US (collective humankind) DURING THE DARK AGES?

    What are the common forces (commonalities) that bind us together?

    A politically motivated, Democrat, a multimillionaire,  black man traveling the globe, to produce a six part TV series, for financial gain.

    Hmmm? And, a  hard working middle class, white American woman from the wild Olympic northwest, that traveled  the globe as a tourist. Specifically Europe… Because she read a book “Pillars of the Earth” a historical novel by Ken Follett, whose ability to convey the fine points of History, architecture so that the cathedral and events become clearly visualized in the reader’s mind…. visiting cathedrals’ and churches in 15 countries, and the Auschwitz  death camp. The real story is, a question,  What happened to us?  when Nazis mass extermination murdered approximately one million European Jews?

    ——————————————————————————–

    THIS IS ABOUT MOTIVE NOT RACE.  

    I am researching, documenting and posting my six part “The Collective History of Us” What happened to us?

    MY ANTITHESIS in opposition between “The Story of Us” collectively, Progressive, UN Globalists, Revisionists, Democrats and “The Collective History of Us”, What happened to us? collectively the hard working citizens of the United States of America (Indeed, What happened to us, happened Globally)

    ————————————————————————–

    Yes, I shall watch the series.

    Hold your friends close, Hold your enemy’s even closer

    ————————————————————–

    THIS IS CHAPTER 1002 IN THE BOOK OF REVELATIONS BY PEARL REVERE, ON MY BLOG, MY DOCUMENTED GLOBAL HISTORY OF EVERYTHING,  FROM “ALBEDO MODIFICATION”, INCLUDES  THE “DARK AGES” AND   “XENOPHOBIA”

    The Book of Revelations by Pearl Revere

    Posted on December 12, 2016 8:21 am by Pearl Rains Hewett

    The Book of Revelations by Pearl Revere

    This is Chapter 831 in the A-Z  book of revelations, as posted on my online blog/website behindmyback.org, including everything from “ALBEDO MODIFICATION” to  “XENOPHOBIA”, and I have been continuously  posting and updating from Jan 29, 2013 to today, Dec 12, 2016.

    —————————————————————————————-

    REALLY?  JUST ONE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION FOR HUMANITY?

    THE STORY OF US? HUMANKIND, HUMAN BEINGS CONSIDERED COLLECTIVELY (USED AS A NEUTRAL ALTERNATIVE TO “MANKIND”

    I AM ADDING TWO MORE QUESTIONS…

    WHAT HAPPENED TO US?

    THE COLLECTIVE HISTORY OF US?

    Facts are Facts:  COMMONALITY, is  a sharing of features or characteristics in common; possession or manifestation of common attributes. 2. a feature or characteristic held in common :

    Historians perceive commonalities of behavior in many eras.

     ———————————————————————-

    COMMONALITY, WITH UN Agenda 21, progressive globalist, revisionist, democrats. that use two collective words “US” and “WE”  to inclusively denote, outright, that all of mankind  and all American Citizens are part of their “US” and “WE”  

    COMMONALITY WITH  Freeman(D) and Obama (D) that said,  it is not who “WE” are.

    I AM A DEPLORABLE

    THE COLLECTIVE HISTORY OF PRESIDENT TRUMPS DEPLORABLES

    NATURE VS NURTURE?

    I WAS NURTURED IN A PATRIOTIC AMERICAN ENVIRONMENT, WHERE I  GREW UP WITH THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS,  IT HAS LEFT ME WITH  A LASTING EFFECT AND  IT SHALL FOREVER  INFLUENCE, THE  WAY I  TALK, BEHAVE AND RESPOND TO THE THINGS AROUND ME.

    I shall forever stand and with my hand on my heart, for the pledge of allegiance, for the American flag, under God,  and the National Anthem. period

    IN GOD WE TRUST AND IN TRUMP WE SHALL PREVAIL

    To be continued….

    1789-2017 REVISIONISM OF US BY REVISIONISTS?

    Revisionism | Definition of Revisionism by Merriam-Webster

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/revisionism

    Definition of revisionism.

    1 :a movement in revolutionary Marxian socialism favoring an evolutionary rather than a revolutionary spirit.

     2 :advocacy of revision (as of a doctrine or policy or in historical analysis)

    THE HISTORY OF US? 1789-2017 REVISIONISM OF US BY REVISIONISTS?

    THE 2017 REVISIONISTS REVOLT, STARTED WITH AN X- NFL PLAYER

    Colin Kaepernick wore socks with ‘pig’ cops | New York Post

    nypost.com/2016/09/01/colin-kaepernick-wore-socks-with-pig-cops/


  • Hyper-globalization by Hook or by Crook?

    Starting were I left off on my last post, in the beginning, the 2001 preface was redefining globalization.

    THE CHANGE IN THE ROLE OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS (INCLUDED NEUTRALIZING THE POWER AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF  U.S.A.) IS THE MOST EVIDENT IN THE CASE OF THE WCD.

    2001 IN THE END, THE ISSUE WAS NOT AND IS NOT ABOUT DAMS.

    Most of the critical reaction was expected. The report represented a significant departure from traditional thinking on the role of large dams in WATER and energy development.It introduced several considerations that were not previously given much weight in decision-making. This will take some getting used to.

    ————————————————————————————–

    After over six years of research and documentation on everything U.S. GOVERNMENT, from Albedo Modification to Zeniphobia

    I’ll call my #965 posting on behindmyback.org

     THE THEORY OF HYPERGLOBALISATION BY HOOK OR BY CROOK?

     (you decide)

     Hmmm…AUG 9, 2017 EXPOSING THE HOOKERS AND CROOKS.

     ———————————————————————————-

     AS NOTED IN THE 2001 COMMENT. SPECIFICALLY REWORDED REGARDING THE GLOBALIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INCLUDING THE PAST THREE DECADES OF HYPERGLOBALISATION.

     —————————————————————————–

    WE THE PEOPLE of The United States government,  have witnessed a three-way migration of the authority-voluntary or INVOLUNTARY-once vested in US:

    The upward migration to supranational structures WITH FUNCTIONS ONCE VESTED  SOLELY THE UNITED STATE GOVERNMENT, WE THE PEOPLE,  such as the European Union (“EU”), the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), or the World Trade Organization (“WTO”);  and outward migration to the GLOBAL market, corporations, and elements of civil society.

    GLOBALIZATION OF THE  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN KEEPING WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY

    PROMINENT AMONG THESE ARE THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS  AT THE  FOREFRONT OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT-THE WORLD BANK, THE IMF,  THE WTO AND TO A LESSER EXTENT THE ORGANIZATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS.

    ——————————————————————————-

    The downward migration to regional and local levels go and IN RESPONSE TO WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA DEMAND FOR LIGHTER U.S. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES;

    MANY FUNCTIONS FORMERLY RESTING WITH THE US GOVERNMENT IN CONGRESS,

    ARE NOW PRIVATIZED,  OR ABANDONED AND ADOPTED BY NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (“NGOS”) and other elements of civil society.

    INDEED,  THESE GLOBAL NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (“NGOS”) RETAIN A DECISION-MAKING STRUCTURE THAT IS BARELY ACCOUNTABLE TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND  WE THE PEOPLE, HARD WORKING, TAXPAYING, VOTING  AMERICAN CITIZENS.

    ————————————————

    WHY PRIVATIZED PROFITEERING ARAMARK is bring in FOREIGN VISA WORKERS from NIGERIA, INDIA, PAKISTAN, ROMANIA etc. And taking jobs away from American citizens in a very small communities in WA State?

    Ever wonder why the federal government would be allowing hundreds of foreign refugees to work in a relatively small town in Idaho?  including all of the above but not limited to, and for other purposes? Wonder no more. Many of them end up working in the world’s largest yogurt factory.

    ———————————————————————————-

    THE THEORY OF HYPERGLOBALISATION BY HOOK OR BY CROOK?  (you decide)

    ———————————————————————————

    GLOBALIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY)

    GLOBALIZATION BY THE WORLD BANK, UNITED NATIONS in the USA, the European Union (EU), UNESCO, World heritage sites, man and the Biosphere, NATO, including all of the above but not limited to, and for other purposes

    GLOBALIZATION by giving away the control and use of Americas public land

    GLOBALIZATION AN INSIDE JOB, BY OBAMA’S DEMOCRATS IN CONTROL OF CONGRESS for eight years.

    GLOBALIZATION by civil service members in the USA is the Senior Executive service (SES)

    GLOBALIZATION BY IMMIGRATION

    GLOBALIZATION BY OBAMA’S APPOINTED. AN INSIDE JOB, giving away the control and use of Americas public land AND WATER.

    PUBLIC WATER TAKEN BY “RULE” EPA AND ARMY CORP (WOTUS)

    PUBIC LAND USE AND CONTROL TAKEN BY USFS  “AUTHORITY” AN NPS TAKEN BY “SELECTION”.

    GLOBALIZATION BY PRIVATIZATION, IN THE USA? START WITH ARAMARK CORP

    IN 2001 THE END ISSUE,WAS NOT AND IS STILL NOT DAMS.THE BOTTOM LINE WAS AND IS THE WORLD BANKS OVERLAPPING ATTEMPTS FOR THE GLOBALIZATION OF THE U.S.A.

    WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAST THREE DECADES OF HYPERGLOBALISATION?

     —————————————————————-

    THE HOOKS AND THE CROOKS?  (AN INSIDE JOB?)

    In April 2011, the EPA, under the Barack Obama administration, proposed a new set of guidelines to replace the two issued under the Bush administration. These guidelines formed the basis of what became the Clean Water Rule. In contrast to the manner in which the 2003 and 2007 guidelines were issued, THE EPA AND THE USACE CONDUCTED PEER-REVIEWED HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES, INTERAGENCY REVIEWS, AND ECONOMIC ANALYSES BEFORE PUBLISHING A FORMAL PROPOSED RULE ON APRIL 21, 2014.[12][15]

    On May 27, 2015, after a public comment period and numerous meetings with state entities, public and private stakeholders, then-EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy along with Assistant Army Secretary Jo-Ellen Darcy signed the Clean Water Rule, set to become effective in August of that year 2015.[1]

    ——————————————————————————————–

    The World Bank was Banking on WOTUS

    Posted on August 7, 2017 9:40 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    ———————————————————————————-

    THE RULE HAS BEEN CONTESTED IN LITIGATION. ITS IMPLEMENTATION HAS BEEN STAYED BY COURT RULINGS SINCE 2015.[3]

    —————————————————————————–

    THE GLOBAL HOOKS AND THE CROOKS?

    THIS ARTICLE IS 3 YEARS OLD The president of the World Bank Jim Yong Kim saidTHE WATER ISSUE IS CRITICALLY RELATED TO climate change. People say that carbon is the currency of climate change. WATER IS THE TEETH. FIGHTS OVER WATER AND FOOD ARE GOING TO BE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT DIRECT IMPACTS OF climate change in the next five to 10 years. There’s just no question about it.

    The president of the World Bank Jim Yong Kim said ,DO WE HAVE A PLAN? ‘What do you mean a plan?’ I said a plan that’s equal to the challenge. A plan that will convince anyone who asks us that we’re really serious about climate change, and that we have a plan that can actually keep us at less than 2C warming. We still don’t have one.DO WE HAVE A PLAN? THE ANSWER, three years ago  WAS NO.

    ————————————————————————————

    DID THE WORLD BANK JUST GET LUCKY?

    Two years later the World Bank had a Global plan. Thanks to Obama and his appointed Administration WOTUS BY RULE.

    ————————————————————————————

    2001 REDEFINING GLOBALIZATION (a 24 page report)

    INTRODUCTION: WORLD COMMISSION ON  DAMS REPORT,

    Late February 2001 – DAMS  AND DEVELOPMENT

    Professor Kader Asmal, Chair World Commission On Dams

    2001 REDEFINING GLOBALIZATION INTRODUCTION: WORLD COMMISSION ON  DAMS REPORT, Late February 2001 – DAMS  AND DEVELOPMENT

    PREFACE  GLOBALIZATION

    REDEFINING ROLES
    The Collapse of the Washington Consensus
    Elements of the New Development Paradigm

    Origins of the WCD

    WHAT WENT WRONG?

    A LOOK AT HOW THE DAM INDUSTRY CHANGED

    INNOVATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY
    EXTENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURE
    ACCOUNTABILITY
    ROLE OF THE WORLD BANK
    THE GLAND MEETING

    III. THE WORLD COMMISSION ON DAMS

    THE SECRETARIAT
    THE WCD FORUM
    THE PROCESS
    A PERSONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS
    Legitimacy of the WCD
    The Results Will Show Success

    Consideration of All Factors

    Formalistic Guidelines Step-by-Step Approach

    HOW THE WCD REPORT HAS BEEN RECEIVED

     

    The WCD presented its report, Dams and Development, in November 2000 ten months have passed since the Commission’s findings were made public. Most of the critical reaction was expected.  it also introduced several considerations that were not previously given much weight in decision-making. This will take some getting used to.

    ————————————————————————————

    AFTER THE PAST THREE DECADES OF HYPERGLOBALISATION?

    DONALD J. TRUMP SAID“AMERICANIZATION NOT GLOBALIZATION”

    DONALD J. TRUMP WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. NOV 8, 2016

    AND THIS WILL REALLY TAKE SOME TIME GETTING USED TO

    THAT’S WHEN THE HOLY COW HIT THE FAN, (in more ways than one).

    NOV 8, 2016  WAS THE DAY SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION WAR STARTED FOR AMERICAS SOVEREIGNTY, AND IT STARTED ON A GLOBAL SCALE.

    AND, THAT SAME DAY, THE SECOND CIVIL (UN-CIVIL) WAR BROKE OUT IN AMERICA.

    ———————————————————————————

    AND IT DIDN’T TAKE VERY LONG BEFORE THE REAL BULL, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, HIT THE PUBLIC MEDIA FAN.

    ——————————————————————–

    WHEN TRUMP PROMISES HE DELIVERS. “AMERICA FIRST”   AND PRESIDENT TRUMP IS DELIVERING FOR THE PATRIOTIC VOTING TAXPAYING HARD WORKING AMERICAN CITIZENS, THAT ELECTED HIM

    ———————————————————————————

    West Wing Reads for 7/6/17 | whitehouse.gov

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2017/07/06/west-wing-reads-7617

    July 6, 2017 at 2:56 PM ET by West Wing Reads … “Congressional lawmakers have gone all in on PRESIDENT TRUMP’S BID TO SLASH OBAMA-ERA REGULATIONS. Each day we round up the best stories the West Wing is reading and share … is KILLING 16 OBAMA-ERA REGULATIONS for every one  (Trumps) administration has enacted ….


  • Manipulating the Weather for War

    MANIPULATING THE WEATHER FOR WAR

    In his 1931 book The Scientific Outlook, Lord Bertrand Arthur Russell,

    DISCUSSED MANIPULATING THE WEATHER.

    “It may be that God made the world,” Russell proclaimed, “that is no reason why we should not make it over.” (in 1950 he was the winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature)

    ————————————————————————————

    MUCH EFFORT WENT INTO STUDIES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION FROM 1945 INTO THE 1970S.

    ——————————————————————————–

    THE CONCEPT OF WEATHER MODIFICATION FOR USE AS A WEAPON OF WAR STARTED IN JUNE 1944.

    THE WAR THAT CHANGED GLOBAL WEATHER

    D-Day Weather Map Is Most Important in History

    Massive World War II bombing raids altered English weather
    Allied bombing raids during WWII turned the English sky white with 
    contrails, providing a case study for scientists studying how the WEATHER is affected by these long, feathery lines of condensation that form behind aircraft

    THE WEATHER MODIFICATION TECHNIQUE AND DEVELOPMENT AS AN INSTRUMENT OF WAR USED SEEDING UNITS COMPOSED OF SILVER IODIDE WERE STARTED IN 1949 AT THE NAVAL WEAPONS CENTER IN CHINA LAKE CALIFORNIA.

    WEATHER MODIFICATION (CLOUD SEEDING) WAS USED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF WAR 1966 IN VIETNAM.

    DURING THE VIETNAM WAR THE US GOVERNMENT USED WEATHER AS A WEAPON UNDER PROJECT POPEYE, THE PROJECT BEGAN IN 1966, LASTED FOR A HALF A DECADE, AND WAS CONSIDERED A SUCCESS.

    ——————————————————————

    MAY 18, 1977  GLOBALCONCERN AFTER  THE VIETNAM WAR

    The United Nations WEATHER Weapons Treaty of May 1977

    UNGA RES – UN Weather Weapons Treaty

    www.cooperazioneallosviluppo.esteri.it/pdgcs/…/iraq/…/Weather_Weapon_Treaty.pdf

    Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December … The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977.

    The United Nations Weather Weapons Treaty of May 1977 warned that scientific and technical developments may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment and that the hostile use of these techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare.

    ———————————————————————————–

    MUCH EFFORT?  U.S. CONGRESS WEATHER MODIFICATION OCT. 26, 1977

    Full text of “Weather modification: programs, problems, policy, and …

    https://archive.org/stream/weatificat00unit/weatificat00unit_djvu.txt

    193 Legislative and congressional activities 194 Federal legislation on weather ….. 93th Cong., 1st sess., Oct. 26, 1977Washington, U.S. Government Printing ….. Operation of cloud-seeding equipment near the border of one State may also …

    ——————————————————————————————

    MUCH EFFORT? BY THE UNITED NATIONS OCT 5, 1978

    The United Nations WEATHER Weapons Treaty of May 1977 was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977 and entered into force on 5 October 1978. warned that scientific and technical developments may open new possibilities with respect to modification of the environment and that the hostile use of these techniques could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    GOOD GRIEF…

    THE U.S. SIGNED A UNITED NATIONS WEATHER WEAPONS TREATY IN 1978

    AND IN JUNE 17, 1996  THE DOD IS PLANNING TO OWN THE WEATHER IN 2025

    The Scientific Outlook 2025 “It may be that God made the world,” the DOD  proclaimed, “that is no reason why we should not make it over.”

    —————————————————————————–

     Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in … – UK Skywatch

    by CTJ House – ‎1996 – ‎Cited by 26 – ‎Related articles

    Aug 5, 1996 – OWNING THE WEATHER IN 2025. A Research Paper … Presented on 17 June 1996,

    ———————————————————————————-

    MUCH EFFORT?  WEATHER MODIFICATION AUG 17, 2013

    US Climate Change Study Explores Weather Modification

    www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/us-climate-change-study-under/16368732

    AUG 17, 2013A U.S. STUDY IS UNDER WAY TO EVALUATE SEVERAL POSSIBLE WAYS TO LIMIT CLIMATE CHANGE INCLUDING SOLAR RADIATION MANAGEMENT AND CARBON DIOXIDE …

    So, when I found out about the study on  “WEATHER MODIFICATION” study and evaluation

    I SENT THIS

    Earth Day Message to Congress

    Posted on April 22, 2015 7:38 am by Pearl Rains Hewett

    I am asking for an email response from our Federal and State Elected Representative with the RESULTS/scientific finding  of the US Climate Change Study Explores WEATHER Modification.

    The U.S. study was expected to be finished in the fall of 2014. (I did not get a response)

    ———————————————————————-

    MAY 2014 THE SHUTTING DOWN OF HAARP’S  WEATHER MODIFICATION

    “WE’RE MOVING ON TO OTHER WAYS OF MANAGING THE IONOSPHERE WHICH THE HAARP WAS REALLY DESIGNED TO DO,” he said. “TO INJECT ENERGY INTO THE IONOSPHERE TO BE ABLE TO ACTUALLY CONTROL IT.

     AND.. THAT WAY TO MANAGE WAS?

    Behind My Back | Albedo modification?

    www.behindmyback.org/category/albedo-modification/

    By definition. Albedo is the technical term for the proportion of sunlight. that Earth’s surface and atmosphere reflect back to space. Albedo modification AKA…

    ————————————————————————————

    OBAMA’S CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA?

    DEC 2016 AFTER MUCH EFFORT BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN COLLUSION WITH THE U.S. GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH PROGRAM…

    THE DRAFT REPORT, KNOWN AS THE CLIMATE SCIENCE SPECIAL REPORT (CSSR), WAS QUIETLY RELEASED IN LATE DECEMBER 2016, JUST BEFORE THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LEFT OFFICE, BY THE UNITED STATES GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH PROGRAM…

    OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CLIMATE SCIENCE SPECIAL REPORT (CSSR)

    WAS LEFT BEHIND FOR THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO FINISH

    ————————————————————————————–

    The bottom line…

    PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST WIPED OUT THE OBAMA CLIMATE CHANGE AGENDA. DO YOU SUPPORT THIS ORDER?  


  • Hillary’s Tyranny Sold Out America

    WikiLeak emails are documenting lying crooked  Hillary, collusion, corrupt, super pacts, global pay per play, 33,000 emails erased bleached, secret servers, extremely careless, Hillary did not go to jail, Hillary collected millions and millions of dubious payola (the practice of bribing someone to use their influence or position to promote a particular product or interest) and the IRS gave her a good to go run for president pass.

    Jefferson 1970 “Single acts of tyranny (cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control) may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”.

    WikiLeak  emails are documenting  that Hillary, as Secretary of State sold out America to the world Bank, the Federal Reserve Cartel , her collusion and corruption at the highest levels in the world, As president Hillary would implement  hemispheric  United Nations globalized control over American Citizens with open borders and free trade and destroy American Sovereignty

    ——————————————————————————

    Oct 15, 2016 DIVERSION IS HILLARY’S ONLY STRATEGY (30 years of political experience)

    Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

    ———————————————————

    1954  THE DOCTRINE ADOPTED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE OF THE BILDERBURG GROUP DURING ITS FIRST KNOWN MEETING.

    DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY

     Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

     FOR AMERICAN VOTERS… COINCIDENCE?  I THINK NOT

    Bilderberg Chooses Hillary Clinton for 2016? | Global Research …

    www.globalresearch.ca/bilderberg-chooses-hillaryclinton-for-2016/5454829

    Jun 8, 2016 – The “official” Bilderberg Group website has released a list of … Bilderberg 2015 so far is the fact that a major Hillary Clinton advisor is on the list …

    It is also well-known that whatever agenda is discussed at Bilderberg will have repercussions for the entire world for years to come.

    By Intellihub News Global Research,

    is a leading independent news agency covering a wide range of issues including globalism, the increasing police state, and the control of media by a small number of corrupt corporations.

    —————————————————————-

    Behind My Back | Silent Weapons For a Quiet War

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent-weapons-for-a-quiet-war/

    This document is the doctrine adopted by the Policy Committee of the Bilderburg Group during its first known meeting in 1954.

    ——————————————————————–

    Silent Weapons For a Quiet War 1954

    Hillary’s Bilderburg Group

    1954 Although the so-called “moral Issues” were raised, in view of the law of natural selection IT WAS AGREED THAT A NATION OR WORLD OF PEOPLE WHO WILL NOT USE THEIR INTELLIGENCE ARE NO BETTER THAN ANIMALS WHO DO NOT HAVE INTELLIGENCE. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

    1954 CONSEQUENTLY, IN THE INTEREST OF FUTURE WORLD ORDER, PEACE, AND TRANQUILITY, IT WAS DECIDED TO PRIVATELY WAGE

    1954 A QUIET WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WITH AN ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE OF PERMANENTLY SHIFTING THE NATURAL AND SOCIAL ENERGY (WEALTH) OF THE UNDISCIPLINED AND IRRESPONSIBLE MANY INTO THE HANDS OF THE SELF-DISCIPLINED, RESPONSIBLE, AND WORTHY FEW.

    —————————————————————–

    Jefferson 1790, “Single acts of tyranny (cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control) may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”.

    WikiLeaks Here’s the full excerpt of the Hillary’s remarks from the e-mail in question,

    WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 13, 2016. Some initial observations: The Soros Hamptons invite (link): Dear Mr. Podesta,. I am writing to follow …

    ——————————————————————————

    Behind My Back | Just a Matter of Time and Money 1790-2016

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/28/just-a-matter-of-time-and-money-1790-2016/

    Apr 28, 2016 – JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND FOREIGN MONEY 1790-2016 1790 … www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent–weapons-for-a-quiet–war/.

    —————————————————————————-

     HILLARY’S  HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS

    Behind My Back | “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/04/16/highcrimes-and-misdemeanors/

    Apr 16, 2014 – Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” by Jon Roland, … Original URL: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm | Text Version

    ———————————————————————–

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

    “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.”

    The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Rothschild, Rockefeller and Morgan …

    humansarefree.com/2015/06/the-federal-reserve-cartel-rothschild.html

    Jun 25, 2015 – The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control. A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form …

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS A BANK THAT IS PRIVATELY OWNED, AND IS WHERE THE UNITED STATES KEEPS MOST OF ITS MONEY.

    To be continued….


  • The Silent Majority Defined 1933-1968-2016

    The Silent Majority Defined 1933-1968-2016

    THE “SILENT MAJORITY,” IS A PHRASE WITH A LONG, LONG HISTORY

    IN 2016 THE HISTORY AND ORIGIN OF THE”SILENT MAJORITY” MUST BE DEFINED AND MADE PERFECTLY CLEAR.

    (for those that think it just started 45 years ago)

    ———————————————-
    Defining words on Germany’s SILENT MAJORITY

    “WHEN THEY CAME I DID NOT SPEAK”

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist; Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew; Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak out for me.
    —————————————————————————————-
    DEFINING THE HOLOCAUST

    The Holocaust began in 1933 and ended in 1945 12 years of Antisemitism (also spelled anti-Semitism or anti-semitism) is PREJUDICE AGAINST, HATRED OF, OR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST JEWS AS AN ETHNIC, RELIGIOUS, OR RACIAL GROUP.

    11 million people were killed during the Holocaust (1.1 million children )
    6 MILLION OF THOSE VICTIMS WERE JEWISH.

    PREJUDICE AGAINST, HATRED OF, OR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST OTHER GROUPS targeted by the Nazis were Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, disabled people, and Roma.

    “WHEN THEY CAME I DID NOT SPEAK” for the record let’s add…

    Then they came for the Jehovah’s Witnesses and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jehovah’s Witnesses – Then they came for the homosexuals and I did not speak out – because I was not a homosexual – Then they came for the disabled people and I did not speak out – because I was not a disabled person – Then they came for Roma and I did not speak out – because I was not a Roma –

    TWO-THIRDS OF JEWISH PEOPLE living in Europe at the time of World War II were killed by ANTISEMITISM …..

    11 million people were killed during the Holocaust (1.1 million children )
    6 MILLION OF THOSE VICTIMS WERE JEWISH,
    5 MILLION OF THOSE VICTIMS targeted by the Nazis ,were other groups of people, prejudiced against, hatred of, or discrimination against.

    ———————————————————————–
    TODAY Niemöller’s words “ON THE SILENT MAJORITY” have meaning.

    THEY ARE OFTEN ALTERED TO FIT DIFFERING POLITICAL OR SOCIAL AGENDA,

    BUT THEY STAND AS A UNIVERSAL CALL FOR SOCIAL ACTION AND SOLIDARITY AND VIGILANCE IN THE FACE OF OPPRESSION AND INJUSTICE.
    ————————————————————————————–

    INDEED, IN 2016, IT IS NECESSARY TO INVESTIGATE THE POLITICAL OR DIFFERING SOCIAL AGENDA’S THAT  ARE REFERRED  TO UNDER THE “SILENT MAJORITY”

    —————————————————————————————-
    NOW THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THE ORIGIN OF THE “SILENT MAJORITY” WE MUST DOCUMENT AND ENLIGHTEN AMERICAN CITIZENS ON  THE SIMILARITIES OF THE USAGE OF THE WORDS “SILENT MAJORITY” IN THE POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS IN NIXON’S 1968 AND TRUMP’S IN 2016.
    —————————————————————————————
    1968-1972 Richard Nixon campaigned on A SILENT MAJORITY PLATFORM
    NIXON CAMPAIGNED ON A PLATFORM DESIGNED TO REACH THE “SILENT MAJORITY” of middle class and working class Americans. He promised to “bring us together again,” and many Americans, weary after years of antiwar and civil rights protests, were happy to hear of peace returning to their streets.
    ————————————————————————————
    2015-2016 Donald Trump is campaigning on A SILENT MAJORITY PLATFORM
    DONALD TRUMP IS CAMPAIGNING ON A PLATFORM DESIGNED TO REACH THE “SILENT MAJORITY” of middle class and working class Americans. The Donald promises to “bring us together again,” and many Americans, weary after years of antiwar and civil rights protests, are happy at the prospect of peace returning to their streets.
    ——————————————————————————
    NIXON CAMPAIGNED ON FOREIGN POLICY WAS ALSO A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE ELECTION. Humphrey was saddled with a Democratic foreign policy that led to what appeared to be absolute futility and agony in Vietnam. NIXON PROMISED TO FIND A WAY TO “PEACE WITH HONOR” IN VIETNAM, though Nixon was never entirely clear about how this was to be accomplished.
    ———————————————————————————
    2016 TRUMP campaign IS ON FOREIGN POLICY WHICH IS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE ELECTION. AMERICA IS CURRENTLY saddled with a Democratic foreign policy that led to the absolute futility FOURTEEN YEARS OF WAR AND CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
    Trump has promised to find a way to “peace with honor” in the middle east, AND THE DONALD IS PERFECTLY AND ENTIRELY CLEAR ON HOW THIS IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED.
    ———————————————————————————–
    1968 Richard Nixon campaigned on A SILENT MAJORITY PLATFORM
    THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, DESPERATE TO FIND A WAY OUT OF THE VIETNAM QUAGMIRE, WERE APPARENTLY WERE READY TO GIVE THE REPUBLICAN AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE GOOD ON HIS CLAIM.

    ————————————————-
    IN 1968 RICHARD NIXON WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT

    Nixon’s “Silent Majority”

    chnm.gmu.edu/…/sil…
    Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media
    DURING HIS SUCCESSFUL CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN 1968, Richard Nixon … In October 1969, PROTESTERS STAGED A HUGE RALLY IN WASHINGTON, D.C. On …
    AT THE END OF THE SPEECH, HE CALLED FOR THE “GREAT SILENT MAJORITY” TO SUPPORT HIM IN THIS GOAL:.
    And so tonight — to you, THE GREAT SILENT MAJORITY OF MY FELLOW AMERICANS — I ask for your support. I PLEDGED IN MY CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENCY TO END THE WAR in a way that we could win the peace. I have initiated a plan of action which will enable me to keep that pledge. the more support I can have from the American people, the sooner that pledge can be redeemed; for the more divided we are at home, the less likely the enemy is to negotiate in Paris.

    ———————————————–

    Richard Nixon: Address to the Nation on the War in Vietnam

    www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid
    University of California, Santa Barbara

    Richard Nixon<br>1969 … THE QUESTION AT ISSUE IS NOT WHETHER JOHNSON’S WAR BECOMES NIXON’S WAR. … In a television speech on May 14, in a speech before the United Nations, and on a number of other occasions I set forth our ….. AND SO TONIGHT–TO YOU, THE GREAT SILENT MAJORITY OF MY FELLOW AMERICANS–I ASK FOR YOUR SUPPORT.

    —————————————————
    IN 1972 RICHARD NIXON WAS REELECTED BY ONE OF THE LARGEST LANDSLIDES IN U.S. HISTORY.

    ———————————————————–
    During his presidency, Nixon oversaw some dramatic changes in U.S. Cold War foreign policy, MOST NOTABLY HIS POLICY OF DETENTE WITH THE SOVIET UNION AND HIS 1972 VISIT TO COMMUNIST CHINA.
    ————————————————————————————
    2016 Donald Trump is campaigning on A SILENT MAJORITY PLATFORM
    TRUMPS IDEALS OF THE SILENT MAJORITY —

    THAT AN OVERLOOKED PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP AND RECLAIM THE VALUES THAT ONCE MADE THE COUNTRY GREAT —
    IS VIRTUALLY EMBEDDED IN TRUMP’S “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” SLOGAN.
    ——————————————————–
    2016 TRUMP’S SILENT MAJORITY
    DURING HIS CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN 2016 ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL, TENS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN VOTERS ARE SHOWING UP AT HUGE RALLIES AT EVERY STOP.
    MR. TRUMP’S REPEATED USE OF “SILENT MAJORITY” IS THRILLING TO AND FOR THE TENS OF THOUSANDS, MILLIONS? OF OVERLOOKED AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT WANT TO STAND UP, VOTE AND RECLAIM THE VALUES THAT ONCE MADE THE COUNTRY GREAT —
    IN TRUMPS CAMPAIGN SPEECHES, HE CALLS FOR THE ” SILENT MAJORITY” TO SUPPORT HIM IN THIS GOAL:.
    THE SILENT MAJORITY OF MY FELLOW AMERICANS — I ask for your support. I HAVE PLEDGED IN MY CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESIDENCY TO END THE WAR in a way that we could win the peace.
    I have a plan of action which will enable me to keep that pledge. the more support I can have from the American people, the sooner that pledge can be redeemed;
    FOR THE MORE DIVIDED WE ARE AT HOME.
    THE LESS LIKELY THE ENEMY IS TO NEGOTIATE IN PARIS.

    —–
    MOST NOTABLY ARE TRUMPS POLICY FOR “DEALING” WITH,

    THE MANY UNRESOLVED IMMIGRATION THREATS,

    THE ISIS TERRORISTS IMMIGRATION VETTING PROCESS,

    CLOSING OUR BORDERS TO THOSE WHO THREATEN AMERICAN CITIZENS BOTH PHYSICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY,

    BUILDING FENCES KEEPING OUT ILLEGALS , AND

    DIPLOMATIC SOLUTIONS WITH COMMUNIST CHINA, AND DIPLOMATIC SOLUTIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION.
    ——————————————————————–
    IN 1968 RICHARD NIXON WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT
    IN 1972 THE SILENT MAJORITY WAS NOT SILENT,

    RICHARD NIXON WAS REELECTED BY ONE OF THE LARGEST LANDSLIDES IN U.S. HISTORY.
    ——————————————————————————–
    BASED ON THE LATEST POLLS JAN 24, 2016, THE “SILENT MAJORITY” OF AMERICAN PEOPLE, ARE GOING TO STAND UP AND VOTE FOR TRUMP SO WE THE PEOPLE CAN RECLAIM THE VALUES THAT ONCE MADE THE COUNTRY OUR COUNTRY GREAT.

    —————————–
    THE “SILENT MAJORITY,” WHICH IS A PHRASE WITH A LONG HISTORY
    THE SILENT MAJORITY AS DEFINED 1933-1968-2016

    —————————————————————–

    ‘Silent Majority?’ Trump Supporters Weigh In – NPR

    www.npr.org/…/what-is-the-silentmajoritytrumpsupportersweigh-in

    NPR

    3 days ago – Donald Trump says he speaks for the “silent majority,” which is a phrase with a long history in politics. Iowa voters supporting Trump discuss …

     


  • UN Heritage Sites and Corridors Back to 1492

    Heritage Area Designations | Another Land Grab U.N. …

    Heritage Sites and Corridors

    HERITAGE CORRIDORS ARE EXTENSIONS OF RESERVES AND U.N. ADVOCATES CLAIM MILLIONS OF ACRES ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN LARGE CARNIVORES!

    If this is allowed to continue, you will witness the elimination of human presence on much of our American landscape!
    ——————————————

    Go Find Your Park? WHAT IS IT?

    Heritage Area Designations | Another Land Grab U.N. …

    securetherepublic.com/…/heritageareadesignationsanotherlandgrab-u…

    Aug 29, 2013 – Heritage Area DesignationsAnother U.N. Agenda 21 Land Grab … World Heritage Area Sites – are under United Nations Educational, .

    ——————————————————————

    DIGGING DEEPER DOCUMENTING MORE

    In the proposed Crooked Road National Heritage Area.

    In one fell swoop…

    19 COUNTIES IN SOUTHERN VIRGINIA WERE TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. (unknown to county the commissioners)

    To do something in one fell swoop is to do it suddenly or in a single, swift action.routinely fast-tracked to passage through Congress with no debate, (unknown to county the commissioners) Fell here is an adjective meaning fierce, savage, cruel, or ruthless

    Sponsored by Congressman Morgan Griffith (R-VA) since 2011. and Senator Mark Warner, Senator (DVA) since 2009, the impending designation, routinely fast-tracked to passage through Congress with no debate,

    —————————————————

    snippet for clarification

    The Crooked Road: Virginia’s Heritage Music Trail (TCR) has been working for over two years 07/28/2012 – with federal officials on a proposal to designate The Crooked Road region of Southwest Virginia
    (19 counties, four cities and over 50 towns) as a National Heritage Area.
    – See more at: http://www.cybergrass.com/node/1546#sthash.OCTOw2r4.dpuf
    ——————————————————————–

    the impending designation, routinely fast-tracked to passage through Congress with no debate,

    WOULD HAVE REMAINED UNKNOWN TO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

    until  A CONCERNED CITIZEN made the counties aware of this move by The Crooked Road 501c3 organization last August, 2012.

    The Crooked Road organization, RESPONDING TO A FOIA REQUEST TO A PRIVATE CITIZEN,  admits  that

    COMMISSIONERS OF ALL 19 COUNTIES WERE NOT ADVISED OF THIS SCHEME!
    ————————————————————————

    WOW,  FEDERAL OFFICIALS WERE WORKING ON THE 

    Crooked Road National Heritage Area.

    FROM 2010 TO 2013

    AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WERE NOT ADVISED?

    AND, WOULD HAVE REMAINED UNKNOWN TO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS?

    ———————————————————————

    ARE YOU A CONCERNED AMERICAN PRIVATE CITIZEN?

    PLEASE ADVISE YOUR ELECTED COUNTY COMMISSIONERS….

    DO YOU HAVE A CONCERNED COUNTY COMMISSIONER?

    ARE YOU A CONCERNED COUNTY COMMISSIONER?

    I am a concerned American Private citizen ,aka a Concerned American Grandmother.

    my website is how I document and advise my elected representatives at every level.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Impending Heritage designation, routinely fast-tracked to passage through Congress with no debate….

    —————————————————-

    I always wanted to do a post using this poem with my freedom of speech

    There was a crooked man, and he walked a crooked mile,
    He found a crooked sixpence against a crooked stile;
    He bought a crooked cat which caught a crooked mouse,
    And they all lived together in a little crooked house.
    ————————————————————
    Was sponsored by Congressman Morgan Griffith (R-VA) since 2011. and Senator Mark Warner, Senator(D-VA) since 2009, the impending designation, routinely fast-tracked to passage through Congress with no debate?
    —————————————————————————–

    Hmmm… How many counties on the Olympic Peninsula? Four (4)
    Clallam and Jefferson Counties, parts of Grays Harbor and Mason Counties, are on the peninsula.

    Hmmm… How many counties on Puget Sound? Twelve (12) counties are located in the Puget Sound region:
    • Clallam
    • King
    • Kitsap
    • Island
    • Jefferson
    • Mason
    • Pierce
    • San Juan
    • Skagit
    • Snohomish
    • Thurston
    • Whatcom
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY on ..

    Behind My Back | WA State Maritime Heritage Area

    www.behindmyback.org/2015/07/01/wastatemaritimeheritagearea/

    Jul 1, 2015 – H.R. 2833 WA State Maritime Heritage Area Maps A MAP IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS Citizens be warned look at your county maps …

    Twelve (12) counties are located in the Puget Sound region:
    ————————————————————————

    Heritage Area Designations | Another Land Grab U.N. …

    securetherepublic.com/…/heritage-area-designations-another-land-grab-u…

    Aug 29, 2013 –Heritage Area Designations Another U.N. Agenda 21 Land GrabWorld Heritage Area Sites – are under United Nations Educational, …

    Heritage Area Sites – are under United Nations Educational, …

    ——————————————————————–
    DIGGING DEEPER DOCUMENTING MORE

    The sinister Department of Interior failed again, earlier this year, in another attempted LAND GRAB, but this time it was in Virginia under a proposed Heritage Area called Crooked Road National Heritage Area 19 COUNTIES IN SOUTHERN VIRGINIA WERE TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. This sure sounds like the deception that went on with the National Blueway System all over again.

    If this Crooked Road National Heritage Area designation would have taken place, it would effectively put the proposed “National Heritage Area” under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service and Department of the Interior.
    WashCo Votes No to Crooked Road National Heritage Area

    It was a major win for property rights activists Tuesday, March 12th, when Washington County Supervisors voted 5-2 against the impending designation of 19 counties in South West VA Congressional District 9 as the USA’s 50thNational Heritage Area“, which would effectively put the District under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service and Department of the Interior.
    Following the lead of Wythe and Russell Counties, along with the Town of Rural Retreat, Washington County passed the Resolution of Non-Support. Smyth County supervisors voted to defund TCR last year.
    —————————————————————————-

    DIGGING DEEPER DOCUMENTING MORE
    There are currently 49 National Heritage Areas, some of which use variations of the title, such as NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR.

    HERITAGE CORRIDORS ARE EXTENSIONS OF RESERVES AND U.N. ADVOCATES CLAIM MILLIONS OF ACRES ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN LARGE CARNIVORES!

    ————————————————————————-
    President Ronald Reagan signing the Illinois & Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor Legislation on August 24, 1984 at the Conrad Hilton …

    ————————————————————————–

    Behind My Back | Restoration of Ursus arctos horribilis?

    www.behindmyback.org/2015/02/…/restoration-of-ursusarctoshorribili

    Feb 14, 2015 – The RESTORATION OF URSUS ARCTOS HORRIBILIS, THE HORRIBLE BROWN BEAR, … www.behindmyback.org/2013/02/04/back-to-1492/.
    This reintroduction plan has been in the works for over 25 years

    ———————————–
    NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDORS ARE EXTENSIONS OF RESERVES AND U.N. ADVOCATES CLAIM MILLIONS OF ACRES ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN LARGE CARNIVORES!

    —————————————————

    Behind My Back | Back to 1492

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/02/04/back-to-1492/

    Feb 4, 2013 – “It is a bold attempt to grope our way back to October 1492 and find a different trail, a trail overgrown and nearly forgotten” – Words of Dave …

    ————————–
    Feb 4, 2013 – BACK TO 1492. A PLAN WHICH IS NOW IN PROCESS OF BECOMING FEDERAL POLICY ~ WAS HATCHED MANY YEARS AGO BY TWO RADICAL ECO-FREAKS – DAVE FOREMAN

    ——————————
    Quote attributed to Dave Foreman WE LIVE FOR THE DAY WHEN GRIZZLIES IN CHIHUAHUA HAVE AN UNBROKEN CONNECTION TO GRIZZLIES IN ALASKA, WHEN GREY WOLF POPULATIONS ARE CONTINUOUS FROM NEW MEXICO TO GREENLAND

    ————————-
    Quote attributed to Dave Foreman “WE MUST… RECLAIM THE ROADS AND THE PLOWED LAND, HALT DAM CONSTRUCTION, TEAR DOWN EXISTING DAMS, FREE SHACKLED RIVERS, AND RETURN TO WILDERNESS MILLIONS AND TENS OF MILLIONS OF [ACRES OF] PRESENTLY SETTLED LAND.” – Quoted by Dixy Lee Ray in her book Trashing the Planet (1990)

    ——————————————
    Indeed in 2016 NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDORS ARE EXTENSIONS OF RESERVES AND U.N. ADVOCATES CLAIM MILLIONS OF ACRES ARE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN LARGE CARNIVORES!

    ——————————————————-

    RECEIVING MORE READING MORE DOCUMENTING MORE

    January 22, 2016

    Pie N Politics » Siskiyou County residents express worry …

    pienpolitics.com/?p=24781

    2 hours ago – Siskiyou County residents express worry over wolves ... from Siskiyou County who were concerned about the wolves‘ return to California.January 22, 2016

    by Liz Bowen
    Record Searchlight
    Local News
    January 22, 2016
    YREKA — Some 300 people showed up at a hearing in Yreka on Thursday night to comment on the state’s draft Gray Wolf Conservation Plan.
    Most of those who spoke represented ranching and hunting groups from Siskiyou County who were concerned about the wolves’ return to California.
    “I don’t want a wolf kill on my place,” said Ryan Walker, a Siskiyou County rancher, referring to wolves killing cattle. “I need to know where the wolves are.”
    The conservation plan attempts to manage the growing number of wolves that have showed up in the state during the past year.
    The state Department of Fish and Wildlife plan analyzes where wolves are likely to live in the state, what they will prey on, how they will affect livestock ranchers and humans. The state is also holding conservation plan meetings in Sacramento and Long Beach.
    This past summer, fish and wildlife biologists documented the state’s first pack in more than 80 years. DNA analysis of the wolves’s droppings indicate they came from the Imnaha pack in northeast Oregon.
    Many of the ranchers who spoke Thursday urged the state to put radio collars on the wolves so they can take steps to protect their cattle.
    Patrick Griffin, a wolf consultant for Siskiyou County, said after a calf was killed, ranchers wanted to know where the wolves were so they could prevent another death.
    “After the incident on the east side of the county, it would have been nice to know where the wolves have gone,” Griffin said.
    The DFW’s Eric Loft told the crowd that getting the wolves collared is a high priority. However, state officials need to locate the wolves before they can collar them.
    “We’ve lost track of the Shasta Pack. We don’t know where they are,” said Karen Kovacs, a program manager for the department.
    Fish and wildlife officials said wolves probably killed a calf in Siskiyou County in November. Kovacs urged those in the audience to notify the department when they see a wolf or any evidence of one.
    Mark Baird, a leader in the State of Jefferson movement, said he suspects the wolves are being trucked into the state, and he and others are looking for evidence.
    But Loft denied that and said he, too, would like to see evidence of anyone in the fish and wildlife department trucking in wolves.
    Siskiyou County Sheriff Jon Lopey said he was concerned about wolves harming people, as well as the economic impact wolves will have on ranchers.
    “I’m very, very concerned, and so are my fellow sheriffs, both inside and outside California,” Lopey said.
    Rich Klug, with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, said he was concerned about how wolves would affect elk herds. He said there are only about 7,000 elk in Northern California. If wolf packs grow too numerous, they could greatly reduce the numbers of elk, which are wolves’ primary source of food, he said.
    About a half-dozen people also spoke in favor of wolves. Karin Vardaman of the California Wolf Center said she was eager to work with ranchers and state officials to prevent cattle deaths.
    “We have no desire to see cattle die,” Vardaman said.
    “I’m very, very concerned, and so are my fellow sheriff’s, both inside and outside California,” Lopey said.
    Rich Klug, with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, said he was concerned about how wolves would affect elk herds. He said there are only about 7,000 elk in Northern California. If wolf packs grow too numerous, they could greatly reduce the numbers of elk, which are wolves’ primary source of food, he said.
    About a half-dozen people also spoke in favor of wolves. Karin Vardaman of the California Wolf Center said she was eager to work with ranchers and state officials to prevent cattle deaths.
    “We have no desire to see cattle die,” Vardaman said.
    http://www.redding.com/news/local/Siskiyou-County-residents-express-worry-over-wolves-366161771.html?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_content=&utm_campaign=TopHeadlines_Newsletter
    In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlLiz Bowen | January 22, 2016 at 6:04 pm | Categories: Dept. Fish & Game, Siskiyou County, State gov, Wolves | URL: http://wp.me/p13fnu-6rH


  • Go Find Your Park? Is it Under United Nations Control?

    Go Find Your Park? Is it Under United Nations AGENDA 21 Control?

    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    Find Your Park – Centennial (U.S. National Park Service)

    www.nps.gov/subjects/centennial/findyourpark.htm
    National Park Service

    Go to FindYourPark.com to share your heritage. Find Your Park logo … Find Your Park is about more than just national parks! It’s about the National Park Service …

    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES. Everyone finds their park in a different place and in a different way. These stories just might inspire you to find yours.

    —————–

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/find

    There are many ways to find your park, and many places you can find it. Want to know where to start your journey? Browse by State or Search. Close. Search …

    Find A Park Experience

    IN 1995 THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE PLACED YELLOW STONE NATIONAL PARK 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND ON “THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST” (continued below)

    BELOW IS A COMPLETE LIST OF AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARKS AND SITES THAT HAVE BEEN PLACED UNDER AGENDA 21 UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL CONTROL, SIMPLY BY BEING DESIGNATED UNDER UNESCO, AS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE, MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE SITES . 

    THE LATEST ADDITION? San Antonio Missions

    IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT, THE ALAMO AND THE  MISSIONS OF SAN ANTONIO WERE ALREADY PROTECTED BY A PLETHORA OF LAWS, FEDERAL LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, TEXAS STATE LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ORDINANCES, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, AND DEED RESTRICTIONS.

    ———————
    THE SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS INCLUDING “THE ALAMO” WAS AWARDED WORLD HERITAGE STATUS FROM UNESCO ON JULY 5, 2015?

    ————————–
    THE DESIGNATIONS, ANNOUNCED SUNDAY, MARK THE FIRST TIME THAT A TEXAS SITE HAS BEEN DEEMED OF “OUTSTANDING CULTURAL OR NATURAL IMPORTANCE TO THE COMMON HERITAGE OF HUMANITY” BY UNESCO, THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION.

    IN JANUARY 2015 IN RESPONSE TO THE UNESCO NOMINATION, REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.

    ———————————
    UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION San Antonio Missions DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL.
    ————————————————————————

    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY ON FOREIGN CONTROL..

    Heritage Area Designations | Another Land Grab U.N. …

    securetherepublic.com/…/heritage-area-designations-another-land-grab-u…

    Aug 29, 2013 –Heritage Area Designations Another U.N. Agenda 21 Land GrabWorld Heritage Area Sites – are under United Nations Educational, …

    —————————————————————————

    SEPTEMBER 8, 1978. YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK AN AREA OF 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC PARK LAND BECAME A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE

    IN 1995 THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE PLACED YELLOW STONE NATIONAL PARK 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND ON “THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST”

    YELLOWSTONE’S ADDITION TO THE ENDANGERED LIST WAS PRIMARILY A RESULT OF THE CONCERN OVER THE PRIVATE LAND USE OF THE NEW WORLD MINE.

    A UNITED NATIONS “BUFFER ZONE SCHEME” WAS PROPOSED PLACING A BUFFER ZONE AROUND, OUTSIDE OF, AND BEYOND YELLOW STONE 2,219,789 ACRES OF PUBLIC NATIONAL PARK LAND…

    A UNITED NATIONS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE CREATED BUFFER ZONE DID TAKE THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, OF NORANDA, INC. CROWN BUTTE MINES BY AFTER BEING DESIGNATED AS A WORLD HERITAGE SITE.
    WOW.. BE ADVISED,  HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN 2016? IS IT ON THE WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER LIST? IS YOUR PUBLIC PARK LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY IN DANGER OF BEING SUCKED IN TO AND BEING CONFISCATED BY A BUFFER ZONE OUTSIDE OF YOUR PARK?

    ———————-

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/

    A park can be many different things to many different people. Watch the … MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES … Share your story to inspire others to find theirs.

    Share Your Story …
    MANY PARKS, MANY STORIES. Everyone finds their park in a different place and in a different way. These stories just might inspire you to find yours.
    HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR PARK IN JAN 22, 2016?

    Find Your Park

    findyourpark.com/find

    There are many ways to find your park, and many places you can find it. Want to know where to start your journey? Browse by State or Search. Close. Search …

    Find A Park Experience?

    THE NEARLY ONE MILLION ACRES OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
    HUGE SWATHS OF WORLD HERITAGE UN AGENDA 21, UNESCO BUFFER ZONES FOR TAKING PRIVATE PROPERTY HAVE BEEN PROPOSED AROUND AND IN ADDITION TO THE NEARLY ONE MILLION ACRES OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK
    IS YOUR AMERICAN NATIONAL PARK PUBLIC LAND AND ADDITIONAL PRIVATE LAND UNDER UNESCO GLOBAL UNITED NATIONS “WORLD HERITAGE” CONTROL?

    ———————————————————-

    Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in …

    www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/olympic_park.html

    Citizen Review Online features news and commentary to people who believe … Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in closing off more land and water … June 16, 2010 … This is straight out of the United Nations Agenda 21.Olympic Park Associates push forward UN Agenda 21 in …
    www.citizenreviewonline.org/2010/Jun/olympic_park.html
    Jun 16, 2010 – This is not surprising, since the Olympic National Park holds two UN … Interestingly, THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA IS LOCATED RIGHT WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE of this biosphere … In addition to the proposed enlargement of the Olympic National Park, … tens of thousands of acres around Lake Ozette, Richmond reported.
    ——————————————————————————–
    BUFFER ZONES? MORE LIKE THE NEW WORLD ORDER OF TH UN AGENDA 21?

    [PDF]Yellowstone National Park v. the New World Mine – Berkeley …

    scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539…elq
    by P Dykstra – ‎1997 – ‎Cited by 17 – ‎Related articles

    contact jcera@law.berkeley.edu. Recommended Citation. Peter Dykstra, Defining the Mother Lode: Yellowstone National Park v. the New World Mine, …
    BUFFER ZONES: A Method To Defend Yellowstone from the New W orld M ine … In 1872, the creation of Yellowstone National Park (hereinafter. Yellowstone, or the …
    BUFFER ZONES: The authors of this definition emphasized that the first priority was the protected area, and the interests of the local citizens should be secondary.

    Part II proposes A BUFFER ZONE management scheme to help protect Yellowstone.
    Part III examines how buffer zones might be implemented near Yellowstone under existing law.

    Part IV discusses THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION AND YELLOWSTONE’S STATUS ASA WORLD HERITAGE SITE IN DANGER as an incentive for buffer zone protection.

    A GLOBAL BUFFER ZONE ONBOTH PUBLIC PAK LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY Noranda, Inc. Crown Butte Mines? Along with President Clinton, members of both Houses of Congress spoke out against the New World Mine.

    Find Your Park – Centennial (U.S. National Park Service)
    www.nps.gov/subjects/centennial/findyourpark.htm
    National Park Service
    The National Park Service invites you to find your park! In celebration of the 100th birthday of the National Park Service in 2016, we are launching a movement to …
    IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING
    SINCE THE BEGINNING 1872, AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARK LANDS WERE ENACTED AND CREATED FOR THE USE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF WE THE PEOPLE. OUR NATIONAL PARKS LANDS ARE OUR AMERICAN HERITAGE.
    1872 Yellowstone National Park By the Act of March 1, 1872, Congress established Yellowstone National Park in the Territories of Montana and Wyoming “AS A PUBLIC PARK OR PLEASURING-GROUND FOR THE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PEOPLE” and national parks can be created only through such acts.
    100 YEARS LATER AFTER, DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.
    ———————————————————————————-
    100 YEARS LATER….SINCE 1972 CONTINUING IN 2016
    AMERICA’S PROMISED LANDS HAVE BEEN GIVEN, BY THE US GOVERNMENT, TO THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNITED NATIONS
    BY FAR THE WORST GOVERNMENT TAKING OF AMERICAN’S PROMISED PUBLIC LAND IS, AND CONTINUES TO BE, TO AND FOR THE UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL UNESCO, AGENDA 21, WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT SINCE 1972
    BY HOOK OR BY CROOK, ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AT EVERY LEVEL, HAS CONTINUED TO TAKE AMERICAN’S DESIGNATED PUBLIC LAND RIGHTS AWAY FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
    IN SPITE OF…
    Behind My Back | The ENABLING ACT February 22, 1889
    www.behindmyback.org/2014/03/…/the-enabling-act-february-22-1889/
    Mar 9, 2014 – Way back then, the Federal Government and the elected representative gave to and enabled American citizens, they made donations of public …
    Moving forward 125 years, “We the People” of Washington State, are in a battle with the Federal and state Governments and our elected representative struggling to preserve, protect, maintain the use of, intent and purpose of the public lands that were given to us in TRUST.
    —————————————————————————————-
    DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.

    The Bundy Family and Armed Resistance to ‘Government …
    www.breitbart.com/…/the-bundy-family-and-armed-resistance-t…
    Breitbart
    Jan 3, 2016 – Bundy Standoff in Nevada … BUNKERVILLE, NEVADA—The Bundy Ranch roundup has …. The Bundy ranch has filled that role for many.
    THE TAKEOVER AT MALHEUR WAS THE LATEST FLARE-UP IN THE SO-CALLED SAGEBRUSH REBELLION, A DECADES-OLD CONFLICT OVER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S CONTROL OF MILLIONS ACRES OF LAND IN THE WEST.
    ——————————————————————————————
    THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, REQUESTING, FUNDING, ALLOWING AND GIVING OUR AMERICAN NATIONAL PARKS AND OTHER AMERICAN HERITAGE SITES TO THE UNITED NATIONS, FOR THE UNITED NATION WORLD HERITAGE SITES, FOR THE UNITED NATIONS MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE, PUTTING OUR AMERICAN HERITAGE PUBLIC LAND AND PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNESCO.
    —————————————————————————————
    WOW, AND EXACTLY WHO IS FUNDING THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HERITAGE SITES?
    Most of its income from COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS from countries
    INDEED, THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS IS LEGISLATING AND AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ARE PAYING FOR THE COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HERITAGE SITES
    MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY PAYING FOR COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATION UNESCO, FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES AS REQUIRED BY LAW OR A RULE; OBLIGATORY. INVOLVING OR EXERCISING COMPULSION; COERCIVE.
    ——————————————————————————–
    THE CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF WORLD HERITAGE SITES wouldn’t be possible without the financial resources to meet World Heritage needs. Sources of income include the World Heritage Fund, WHICH RECEIVES MOST OF ITS INCOME FROM COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM COUNTRIES (States Parties) and from voluntary contributions. Other sources of income include profits derived from sales of World Heritage publications, or funds-in-trust that are donated by countries for specific purposes.
    ——————————————————————————-
    AMERICA’S WORLD HERITAGE SITES UNDER THE GLOBAL CONTROL OF UNITED NATIONS UNESCO
    DESIGNATED U.S. WORLD HERITAGE SITES BY THE UNITED NATIONS, JOINING OTHER KEY LANDMARKS SUCH AS THE STATUE OF LIBERTY, PHILADELPHIA’S INDEPENDENCE HALL, YELLOWSTONE AND GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARKS AND MONTICELLO, THOMAS JEFFERSON’S VIRGINIA HOME……

    THE LATEST? San Antonio Missions
    THE SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS INCLUDING “THE ALAMO” WAS AWARDED WORLD HERITAGE STATUS FROM UNESCO ON JULY 5, 2015.
    In addition to the Alamo, the newly designated “world heritage” shrines include missions at Concepción, San Jose, San Juan and Espada, all in San Antonio.
    THE DESIGNATIONS, ANNOUNCED SUNDAY, MARK THE FIRST TIME THAT A TEXAS SITE HAS BEEN DEEMED OF “OUTSTANDING CULTURAL OR NATURAL IMPORTANCE TO THE COMMON HERITAGE OF HUMANITY” BY UNESCO, THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION.

    United States of America

    ———————————————————————————–
    WORLD HERITAGE San Antonio Missions
    THE SITE ENCOMPASSES
    A GROUP OF FIVE FRONTIER MISSION COMPLEXES SITUATED ALONG A STRETCH OF THE SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASIN IN SOUTHERN TEXAS,
    AS WELL AS A RANCH LOCATED 37 KILOMETRES TO THE SOUTH.
    IT INCLUDES ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES,
    FARMLANDS, RESIDENCIES, CHURCHES AND GRANARIES,
    AS WELL AS WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS.
    ——————————————————————————-
    THE MISSIONS’ PHYSICAL REMAINS COMPRISE A RANGE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STRUCTURES INCLUDING FARMLANDS (LABORES), CATTLE GROUNDS (RANCHOS), RESIDENCES, CHURCHES, GRANARIES, WORKSHOPS, KILNS, WELLS, PERIMETER WALLS AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS.
    ——————————————————————————–
    THE MISSIONS OF SAN ANTONIO WERE ALREADY PROTECTED BY A PLETHORA OF LAWS, FEDERAL LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, TEXAS STATE LAWS AND DESIGNATIONS, CITY OF SAN ANTONIO ORDINANCES, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS, EASEMENTS, AND DEED RESTRICTIONS.
    IN JANUARY 2015 IN RESPONSE TO THE UNESCO NOMINATION, REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.
    UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL.
    HOW STUPID DO THE UNESCO OFFICIALS THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN TEXAS ARE?
    WORD GETS AROUND IN CYBERSPACE
    AND, YOU CAN KEEP YOUR DOCTOR?
    ——————————————————————
    HOW STUPID DO WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE THINK WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE?
    2015 UNESCO OFFICIALS HAVE SAID THE (WORLD HERITAGE) DESIGNATION DOES NOT OPEN UP THE ALAMO TO ANY KIND OF FOREIGN CONTROL?
    WHY EVERY AMERICAN TAXPAYING CITIZEN SHOULD OBJECT TO EVERY SQUARE INCH OF AMERICA’S PROMISED PUBLIC LAND BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS
    PERHAPS THIS WILL REFRESH OUR WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE MEMORY…
    OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK WAS GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS IN 1976
    AS A WILD UNESCO, UN WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND A U.N. MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE.
    IN 1988, CONGRESS DESIGNATED 95% OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK AS WILDERNESS. …

    —————————–

    The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/

    stop the wild olympics, agenda 21, land grabs; will devastate rural communities.
    —————————————————————–
    REPUBLICAN STATE SEN. DONNA CAMPBELL INTRODUCED LEGISLATION BANNING ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING THE ALAMO COMPLEX.
    WHY WOULD ANY ONE INTRODUCED LEGISLATION TO BAN ANY FOREIGN ENTITY FROM OWNING, CONTROLLING OR MANAGING PUBLIC LAND BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE?
    WORD ABOUT FOREIGN GLOBAL CONTROL GETS AROUND IN CYBERSPACE
    ————————————————————————————
    THE 2016 UNESCO EDITION OF AGENDA 21, WILL FOCUS MAINLY ON ISSUES DEALING WITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PARTICULARLY IN URBAN AREAS. THIS EVENT WILL GATHER MORE THAN 800 PARTICIPANTS FROM THE FIELDS OF “HERITAGE CONSERVATION”, archaeology, architecture and urban planning, engineering, social sciences, AS WELL AS FIELDS RELATED TO LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CRISIS INTERVENTION.

    THE UNESCO CONGRESS IS ORGANISED UNDER THE AEGIS OF THE ISCEAH COMMITTEE OF ICOMOS INTERNATIONAL, IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE EARTHEN ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMME (WHEAP).
    ——————————————————————————————————


  • The Promised Land Olympic National Park

    The Promised Land Olympic National Park

    Sept. 30, 1937 President Roosevelt came to Port Angeles WA
    A banner hung across the courthouse saying: “Mr. President, we children need your help. Give us our Olympic National Park.”
    President Roosevelt said “Mr. Mayor and my friends of Port Angeles,” “That sign is the appealingest appeal I have ever seen in my travels. I am inclined to think it counts more to have the children want that park than all the rest of us put together.
    “So, you boys and girls, I think you can count on my help in getting that national park, not only because we need it for us old people and you young people, but for a whole lot of young people who are going to come along in the next hundred years of America.”
    ————————————————————————-
    And, indeed as promised by President Roosevelt, The Promised Land Olympic National Park was CREATED AND enacted.

    —————————————
    An Act To establish the Olympic National Park, in the State of Washington, and for other purposes, approved June 29, 1938 (52 Stat. 1241)

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives
    of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    16. Olympic National Park Establishment of park Act of June 29, 1938
    Establishment of park Act of June 29, 1938 An Act To establish the Olympic National Park, in the State of Washington, and for other purposes, approved June 29, 1938 (52 Stat. 1241)
    II. NATIONAL PARKS – OLYMPIC
    all west of the Willamette meridian,
    in Washington, are hereby reserved and withdrawn
    from settlement, occupancy, or disposal

    ——————
    UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND DEDICATED AND SET APART AS A PUBLIC PARK FOR THE BENEFIT AND ENJOYMENT OF THE PEOPLE AND SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK

    ——-

    and all lands formerly
    included in the Mount Olympus National Monument
    and not included in the above description are hereby transferred
    to and made a part of the Olympic National Forest.
    (16 U.S.c. sec. 251.)
    —————————————————————
    II. NATIONAL PARKS – OLYMPIC

    SUBJECT TO ALL LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO OTHER LANDS
    WITHIN SUCH PARK:
    Provided, That the total area of the
    said park shall not exceed eight hundred and ninety-eight
    thousand two hundred and ninety-two acres:

    ——————–
    PROVIDED FURTHER, THAT BEFORE ISSUING ANY SUCH PROCLAMATION, THE
    PRESIDENT “SHALL” CONSULT WITH THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
    WASHINGTON, THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND THE SECRETARY
    of Agriculture
    AND ADVISE THEM OF THE LANDS WHICH HE PROPOSES
    TO ADD TO SUCH PARK, AND SHALL AFFORD THEM A REASONABLE
    OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH AND COMMUNICATE TO HIM
    THEIR VIEWS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE ADDITION
    OF SUCH LANDS TO SUCH PARK.! (16 U.S.c. sec. 255.)

    ———————————–
    SEC. 3. THE INCOME OF EACH COUNTY RECEIVING MONEYS
    FROM THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST, under the Act of May
    23, 1908 (35 Stat. 260, ch. 192), as amended, shall be proportional to the total area of each county in the Olympic National Forest and the Olympic National Park combined.
    (16 U.S.c. sec. 253.)
    ———————————————————-
    SEC. 4. The administration, protection, and development
    of the Olympic National Park shall be exercised under
    the direction of the Secretary of the Interior BY THE NATIONAL
    PARK SERVICE, subject to the provisions of the Act of August
    25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled “An Act to establish a
    National Park Service, and for other purposes”, as amended.
    (16 D.S.C. sec. 254.)
    ——————————————————
    SEC. 5. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED “SHALL” AFFECT ANY VALID
    EXISTING CLAIM, LOCATION, OR ENTRY MADE UNDER THE LAND LAWS
    OF THE UNITED STATES, WHETHER FOR HOMESTEAD, MINERAL,
    RIGHT~ OF-WAY,
    OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WHATSOEVER,
    OR SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY SUCH CLAIMANT, LOCATOR,
    OR ENTRYMAN TO THE FULL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HIS LAND
    —————————————————————
    WHY I AM HAVING A PROBLEM WITH

    The 1938 Promised Land Olympic National Park

    Behind My Back | Access Denied

    www.behindmyback.org/category/access–denied/
    Dec 12, 2015 – Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. ONP ACCESS DENIED TO ALL CITIZENS – PUBLIC LAND – U.S. POPULATION 320 …

    ————————

    NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED “SHALL” AFFECT OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WHATSOEVER
    SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY SUCH CLAIMANT, LOCATOR, OR ENTRYMAN TO THE FULL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HIS LAND

    The 1938 Promised Land Olympic National Park?

    Behind My Back | Part 1 (WOW) a War on Wild?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/01/27/part1wow-a-war-on-wild/

    Jan 27, 2014 – Now is the time for many of us to speak of a War On Wild and keep … Endangered Species Act, in the Federal Register of Friday, July 1, 2011.

    ————————————————————————
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY… WHY I AM HAVING A PROBLEM WITH THIS?

    Behind My Back | NPS Connectivity 101

    Posted on October 21, 2013 2:37 pm by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment
    The designation of these World Heritage Sites was authorized by the World Heritage Convention, a treaty signed by President Richard Nixon and ratified in 1973. The World Heritage Program is carried out by UNESCO, to which the United States doesn’t even belong. President Ronald Reagan pulled us out of UNESCO because it was totally corrupt.
    The UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program was created in 1970. The United States joined in 1974 when our State Department signed a memorandum of understanding (not a treaty) to put us in the Biosphere Program and pledge that the United States will adhere to the Biosphere conditions and limitations laid down by UNESCO. Paragraph 44 of the World Heritage Operational Guidelines states that “natural” Heritage Sites (as contrasted to “cultural”) can be interchanged with “core reserves” of the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Program. These core protected areas are planned to be surrounded by highly regulated buffer zones, all for the sake of “biodiversity.”

    ——————————
    So, the Park Service is choking off the local economy by refusing to maintain certain highways and by buying up any property available. Of course, there will be plenty available as more and more owners are denied the use of their own private property which causes businesses to shut down and the economy to slow.
    http://pages.map.com/bkpowell/unparksofflimits.html
    ——————————————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY…

    WHY WOULD ANY ONE OBJECT TO  THE PROMISED PUBLIC LAND OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK BEING GIVEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS IN 1976?

    AS A WILD UNESCO, UN WORLD HERITAGE SITES AND A U.N. MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE.

    IN 1988, CONGRESS DESIGNATED 95% OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK AS WILDERNESS. …

    The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/

    stop the wild olympics, agenda 21, land grabs; will devastate rural communities.

    ————————————————————————

    WOW…. OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK LONG-RANGE Interpretive Plan
    November 2010 Plan Highlights
    During the next seven to ten years Olympic National Park interpretive services will provide visitors with opportunities to increase their understanding and appreciation for the park and its resources; to engage in educational opportunities; and to protect the park resources. To provide an active, engaging interpretive program, park staff and partners will work together focused on the following goals:

    INTERPRET ELWHA RIVER 2010-2017 RESTORATION?

    —————————————————
    OR SHALL WE THE PEOPLE

    INTERPRET ELWHA RIVER 2015-2016 DEVASTATION?

    IGNORED BY OUR WA DC ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray

    Behind My Back | Access Denied

    www.behindmyback.org/category/access–denied/
    Dec 12, 2015 – Derek Kilmer, Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray. ONP ACCESS DENIED TO ALL CITIZENS – PUBLIC LAND – U.S. POPULATION 320 …

    ——————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY…
    1944 OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK LONG-RANGE PLAN

    “George, I should not tell you this, but the long range plan of the National Park Service is to take the whole Olympic Peninsula over and put it in the Olympic National Park and move everyone off the Olympic Peninsula.”
    ————————————————————————-
    REFRESH YOUR MEMORY… ON THE LOSS OF THE PROMISED  OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK PUBLIC LAND… in the step by step acquisition of private and DNR land by the National Park Service, as this is being written and during the last 21 years from 1992 to 2013.

    ————————————————————–

    Behind My Back | “Conspiracy Exposed”

    The notarized document “Conspiracy Exposed” was written on Oct. 8, 1992 by George C. Rains Sr. when he was 77 years old.
    The referenced “Conspiracy” was exposed in a conversation at Sol Duc Hot Springs between the acting Olympic National Park Superintendent Preston Macy and my father George C. Rains Sr. in 1944.
    ———————————————————————-

    If you are interested? snippets of info on UN AGENDA..

    From the beginning, biosphere reserves were conceived as addressing three
    basic needs or “concerns”:
    1. Conservation Concern -conservation of ecosystems and the genetic resources
    they contain
    2.Logistic Concern-international net work for research, monitoring, and education
    3.Development Concerns of sustainable human uses of ecosystems

    In 1988,the National Committee declined approval of U.S. participation in
    nominating a multi-site biosphere reserve in northern Minnesota and adjacent Canada

    BASED ON CONCERNS OF LOCAL CITIZENS GROUPS OVER THE IMPLICATIONS OF BIOSPHERE RESERVE DESIGNATION ON TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USES.

    Although the concerns lacked a factual basis, the Committee’s unprecedented rejection of a nomination underscored the need to enlist stakeholder participation in the biosphere reserve planning process

    ——————————————————————–

    ATTACHMENT II EXECUTIVE
    OFFICE OF TUB PRESIDENT
    OFFICE Of SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT
    AND BUDGET $$$$$
    Washington,D.C.10503
    MARCH 9,1979
    MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF “CERTAIN” DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
    SUBJECT: U.S. Participation in UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Program

    Designation of sites administered by state and local governments, nongovernmental organizations, and private institutions has increased steadily during the past decade (see Attachment IV). In 1976, all BR sites were Federal. Non-Federal participation has been the principal factor in growth of the network since 1983
    ———————————————————————–


  • The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE …
    THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

    ————————————
    THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD,
    Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;

    —————–
    Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;

    —————————-
    Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted of man’s material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
    Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:

    —————————————————————–
    (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required of preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    (b) the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
    (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    Call on the negotiating states:
    (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
    (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
    (c) Also to seek – without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program – agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
    Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
    (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safe-guarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
    (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
    (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
    (d) As stated relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation an common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
    (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
    Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
    STAGE I
    A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
    (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
    (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
    (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
    (d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.
    C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
    (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
    (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
    (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
    (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
    (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfer to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
    (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
    E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
    (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
    (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle. F. To reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
    (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
    (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations of the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.
    G. To Keep the Peace:
    (a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force – including nuclear, conventional, or CBR – contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
    (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
    (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
    (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be despatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STAGE II
    A. International Disarmament Organization:
    The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.
    B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
    (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
    (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.
    D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
    E. To Keep the Peace:
    During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the united Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the united Nations:
    (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the united Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
    (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.
    STAGE III
    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force (emphasis added) and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
    The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
    (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
    (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    The end of Publication 7277


  • Smoke Pot? Not Pork?

    WHO said that……..
    “THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION MEDIA NEWS RELEASE, DOCUMENTING MEDICALLY, ABSOLUTELY, SMOKED PROCESSED MEAT, BACON, SAUSAGE, HOT DOGS, HAM, SANDWICH MEAT,  IS A CARCINOGENIC AND CAUSES CANCER period

    ———————————————————-
    WHERE THERE’S SMOKE THERE’S FIRE. Means that if something looks wrong then it probably is …

    THE MEDIA SPIN…. The United Nations, Corporations, governments, advertisers and even religions have gone to great lengths to control the way you think, eat, act and vote, ad nauseam, They always have an obvious stated agenda, usually some danger to public health and via the EPA. And, they also have the less obvious,  FEDERAL AND GLOBAL AGENDA 21.

    ———————————————————————
    Indeed, WHERE THERE’S SMOKE THERE IS FIRE.

    lf something looks wrong then it probably is …

    SMOKING GUNS? incontrovertible incriminating evidence.

    SMOKING WOOD STOVES… SMOKING BONFIRES…SMOKING BARBECUES…

    ——————–
    BEHIND THE SMOKE SCREEN? SMOKING POT, SMOKING PORK AND SMOKING SALMON..

    ———————————–
    Don’t buy the global media fear mongering, scare tactics driven by a UN global agenda.

    —————————————————-
    Dr. David Agus, one of the world’s leading cancer specialists and a CBS News medical contributor, told “CBS This Morning” “To put this in perspective, the lifetime risk of colon cancer is 5 percent,” Agus said. “If you have a hot dog every day, your risk goes to 6 percent.”

    ————————————————-
    IS THE WHO’S, REAL ISSUE, SMOKED SALTED AND PROCESSED MEATS INCLUDE BACON, SAUSAGE, HOT DOGS, HAM, SANDWICH MEAT, … “DEFINING PROCESSED MEAT AS “MEAT PRESERVED BY SMOKING, CURING OR SALTING, ….. or is the global media hype really, about PORK.

    ————————————————-
    WHO’S BEING PROCESSED BY WHO?
    Processed definition, a systematic series of actions directed to some end….. to devise a process A series of actions, changes, or functions bringing about a result a series of actions that produce something or that lead to……

    —————————————-
    the bottom line

    WHO’S REALLY BANNING AND PROHIBITING SMOKING EVERYTHING?
    OUR SMOKING GUNS…..SMOKING WOOD STOVES… SMOKING BONFIRES…SMOKING BARBECUES…
    —————————————————————————————
    Processed meats do cause cancer – WHO – BBC News
    www.bbc.com/news/health-34615621
    BBC
    2 hours ago – Processed meats – such as bacon, sausages and ham – do cause cancer, according to THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). ITS REPORT SAID …