+menu-


  • Category Archives ESTABLISH JUSTICE?
  • FBI Comey Was Mildly Nauseous?

    Read the Rest of the Story… by Pearl Harvey

    HILLARY CLINTON ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

    No wonder Comey Was Mildly Nauseous….

    This documented comment is enough to gag a maggot

    Hilary Clinton did not swear an oath to tell the truth before meeting with the FBI for three and a half hours last weekend, and the interview was not recorded, FBI Director James Comey told House lawmakers on Thursday.

    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.

    ———————————————————
    June 3, 2014
    For decades, criminal investigators have known that the best way to obtain and preserve reliable information is to electronically record interviews and interrogations.
    And yet agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have continued to rely on handwritten notes taken during interrogations, which they later type onto so-called 302 forms.
     ——————————————
    That will finally change. In mid-May, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo instructing all federal investigative agencies—including the F.B.I., the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives—to use electronic recording while interviewing witnesses and suspects,
    EXCEPT IN CASES  INVOLVING NATIONAL SECURITY
    the new policy goes into effect on July 11th. 
    —————————————————————-
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.
     —————————————————————-
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ——————————————————

    May 3, 2017 – Comey said Wednesday that it makes him “mildly nauseous” to think his decision to reopen the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails just days before the election could have impacted voters, but added he would make the same choice again.

    “I faced a choice,” Comey said. “And I’ve lived my entire career by the tradition that if you can possibly avoid it, you avoid any action in the run-up to an election that might have an impact, whether it’s a dog-catcher election or president of the United States. But I sat there that morning and could not see a door labeled ‘no action here.'”

    In his most detailed explanation and strongest defense of his actions to date, Comey said it was a choice between “really bad and catastrophic” to inform lawmakers about the discovery of additional Clinton emails found on the computer of former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

    Comey said he had the choice to either “speak” or “conceal.” He called the decision — which quickly became public — “one of the world’s most painful experiences,” but said making it was the right move.

    ————————————————————

    FBI Memo

    www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20070402_FBI_Memo.pdf
    Apr 2, 2007 – Page 1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. Frecedauon ROUTINE ‘ Date: 3/23/2006. To: All Field Offices ittm ADIC, sac, and cm:.

    ————————————-

    Bill,

    online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf

    Mar 30, 2006 – Details: FBI policy on electronic recording of confessions and witness interviews is contained in a SAC Memorandum 22—99, dated 10 August …

    ————————————————————
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ————————————————————-
    Dated 3/17/06 Office of the General Council Investigative Law Unit
    ELECTRON RECORDING OF CONFESSIONS AND WITNESSES
    http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf
    This is a 54 page DOJ document
    with a hand written notation “SO WE WANT TO HIDE THE TRUTH? DON’T WANT JURY TO REACH IT’S OWN JUDGMENT?
    It is recognized there are many situations in which recording the subjects interview would be prudent…
    On a case-by-case opportunity to use this technique where and when it will be used to further the investigation and subsequent prosecution….
    ————————————————–
    Except in cases  LIKE HILLARY CLINTON’S involving national security
    —————————————————
    From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent;36 chains contained Secret information at the time
    ———————————————————————–
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

    Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing.

    Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

    After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

    This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.

    I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.

    So, first, what we have done:

    The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.

    Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

    Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.

    click on the link below to read the full text

    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of …

    https://www.fbi.gov/…/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-…

    Jul 5, 2016Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System. Remarks …

    In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.

    Opinions are irrelevant,  they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation.

  • WA State DOE Environmental Justice WAC

    WA State DOE Environmental Justice WAC

    Regarding proposed WA State  Chapter 173-321 WAC

    WHAT IS VAGUENESS AND OVERBREADTH?

    RELATED TO THE OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE IS THE DOCTRINE OF VAGUENESS. THE VAGUENESS DOCTRINE, AN ASPECT OF THE DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENT OF NOTICE, HOLDS THAT A LAW IS FACIALLY INVALID IF PERSONS OF “COMMON INTELLIGENCE MUST NECESSARILY GUESS AS AT ITS MEANING AND DIFFER AS TO ITS APPLICATION.”

    —————————————–

    SO WHAT ABOUT THIS WA STATE WAC?

     IS IT FACIALLY INVALID IF PERSONS OF “COMMON INTELLIGENCE MUST NECESSARILY GUESS AS AT ITS MEANING AND DIFFER AS TO ITS APPLICATION?

     AS USUAL YOU HAVE TO READ 173-321 WAC, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GRANTS TO FIND OUT WHAT’S IN IT!

    MISLEADING TO SAY THE LEAST” I read it, the full text is below.

     For more information:

    http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/rules/wac173321/1613ov.html

    ECOLOGY’S Introduction

    Under Chapter 70.105D RCW, Ecology administers a program for GRANTS TO

     “PERSONS WHO MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY A RELEASE OR THREATENED RELEASE OF A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT PUBLIC INTEREST GROUPS”.

    Grants are used to “facilitate public participation in the investigation and remediation of a release OR THREATENED RELEASE OF A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE and to implement the state’s solid and hazardous waste management priorities.”

    Scope of rulemaking
    WA STATE DEPT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) PROPOSES TO:

    • REVISE PROGRAM PRIORITIES TO INCLUDE ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
    • Revise eligibility requirements
    • Clarify the criteria used to evaluate applications
    • Revise eligible costs
    • Develop a method for renewing grants annually per Chapter 70.105D RCW
    • Streamline the grant application and evaluation process to increase consistency, transparency, objectivity, and efficiency
    • Revise the grant application process to authorize electronic submittals
    • Update grant administration requirements
    • Align Chapter 173-321 WAC to current program needs.

    Added for clarity…

    CHAPTER 173-321 WAC

    PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GRANTS

    Complete Chapter

    WAC Sections

    173-321-010

    Purpose and authority.

    173-321-020

    Definitions.

    173-321-030

    Relationship to other legislation and administrative rules.

    173-321-040

    Applicant eligibility.

    173-321-050

    Application evaluation criteria.

    173-321-060

    Eligible project costs.

    173-321-070

    Grant funding.

    173-321-080

    Grant administration.

    WAC 173-321-060

    Eligible project costs.

    (1) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS FOR SUBSTANCE RELEASE GRANTS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

    (A) HIRING TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS TO REVIEW AND INTERPRET DOCUMENTS;

    (b) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT and public education activities;

    (C) REVIEWING SPECIFIC PLANS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND ANALYSIS, REVIEWING REPORTS SUMMARIZING THE RESULTS OF SUCH PLANS AND MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MODIFICATIONS TO SUCH PLANS.

    (D) EXPENDABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY;

    (E) OTHER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.

    (2) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT

     PRIORITY GRANTS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

    (a) Assisting in DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS that promote or improve state or local solid or hazardous waste management plans;

    (b) Assisting in developing programs or activities that promote and are consistent with the state solid or hazardous waste management priorities;

    (C) EXPENDABLE PERSONAL PROPERTY;

    (D) OTHER PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.

    (3) Ineligible projects and grant costs shall include but not be limited to:

    (a) Independently collecting or analyzing samples at facility sites;

    (B) HIRING ATTORNEYS FOR LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST POTENTIALLY LIABLE PERSONS, FACILITY OWNERS, OR THE DEPARTMENT. APPLICANTS WHO RECEIVE A GRANT AWARD SHALL NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT IF LEGAL ACTION IS INTENDED OR TAKEN ON THE SUBJECT OF THE GRANT PROJECT OR APPLICATION;

    (C) LEGISLATIVE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES;

    (d) Real property;

    (e) Nonexpendable personal property.

    [Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.105D RCW. WSR 01-05-024 (Order 97-09A), § 173-321-060, filed 2/12/01, effective 3/15/01. Statutory Authority: 1989 c 2. WSR 89-21-072 (Order 89-26), § 173-321-060, filed 10/17/89, effective 11/17/89.]

    To join or leave ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK click here:

    http://listserv.wa.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK

    ————————————————————————

    Why does WA State DOE need an Environmental Justice WAC?

    WAC, WAC, WAC, ECOLOGY’S HISTORIC POLICY OF REDUNDANT DUPLICITY

    Environmental Justice | US EPA

    https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice

    Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation, and ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES.

    ——————————————————————-

    Chapter 173-321 WAC
    Public Participation Grants

    Overview

    Introduction

    Under Chapter 70.105D RCW, Ecology administers a program for grants to “persons who may be adversely affected by a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance and not-for-profit public interest groups”. Grants are used to “facilitate public participation in the investigation and remediation of a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance and to implement the state’s solid and hazardous waste management priorities.”

    Why are we doing this rulemaking?
    In 2016, Ecology obtained an independent audit of our Public Participation Grants program. The current application process for the grants requires a significant amount of time and agency resources to establish applicant eligibility and award the grants. Changes Ecology is proposing are either specific audit recommendations or based on the agency’s experiences implementing the program.

    Input from past grant recipients and other stakeholders also indicated a need to increase the emphasis the PPG program places in reaching disadvantaged communities adversely affected by toxic contamination and cleanup work. Updating the rule now will allow us to apply these changes to grants awarded in the 2017-19 biennium.

    Scope of rulemaking
    Ecology proposes to:

    • Revise program priorities to include environmental justice
    • Revise eligibility requirements
    • Clarify the criteria used to evaluate applications
    • Revise eligible costs
    • Develop a method for renewing grants annually per Chapter 70.105D RCW
    • Streamline the grant application and evaluation process to increase consistency, transparency, objectivity, and efficiency
    • Revise the grant application process to authorize electronic submittals
    • Update grant administration requirements
    • Align Chapter 173-321 WAC to current program needs.

    Ecology will periodically update these web pages to provide up-to-date information about this rulemaking. We will notify interested parties through the agency email listserv (WAC Track), a Waste 2 Resources ListServ specifically established for the Public Participation Grants program. We will e-mail contacts identified in our grants-related database and those identified by grants staff. We will publish notice in the Washington State Register as we move through the process. To learn more about how to contact Ecology and participate in the process, please visit our public involvement page.

    ADDITIONAL RULE INFORMATION

     

     

    Regarding 173-321 WAC, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GRANTS

    Granted, I have been publicly participating, criticizing, objecting, commenting and tracking Ecology’s, WA State DOE Environmental WAC-ING for years.  I do investigative documentation and reporting on my website. I have been signed up for Ecology’s WAC Track for years, receiving, reading hundreds of pages,  investigating and documenting, posting, commenting and disseminating information on  one proposed WAC after another WAC….

    This was my published opinion on Apr 15, 2013,  and I’m sticking with it. period

    Behind My Back | “Ecology Sucks”

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/04/15/ecology-sucks/

    APR 15, 2013 – “Ecology Sucks” And, the rest of the story. The local news papers did report that I said it. WHAT THE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS DID NOT REPORT …

    ———————————————————————————-

    Behind My Back | Ecology’s Expedited Rule Making?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/06/26/ecologys-expedited-rule-making/

    JUN 26, 2014 – Washington Department of Ecology AO #14-01 NOTICE THIS RULE REPEAL IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER AN EXPEDITED RULE- MAKING …

    —————————————————————————-

    MY ONE RIGHT TO OBJECT TO ECOLOGY’S EXPEDITED RULE MAKING

    Behind My Back | A Thousand Wrongs? One Right?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/09/17/2757/

    SEP 17, 2014 – OK, so what’s WRONG with that? We the people, have every RIGHT to make a THOUSAND public objections and comments. So what’s …

     “One right doesn’t remedy a thousand wrongs.’

    —————————————————————————-

    WHAT IS VAGUENESS AND OVERBREADTH?

     BEST GUESS OBAMACARE….

     RELATED TO THE OVERBREADTH DOCTRINE IS THE DOCTRINE OF VAGUENESS. THE VAGUENESS DOCTRINE, AN ASPECT OF THE DUE PROCESS REQUIREMENT OF NOTICE, HOLDS THAT A LAW IS FACIALLY INVALID IF PERSONS OF “COMMON INTELLIGENCE MUST NECESSARILY GUESS AS AT ITS MEANING AND DIFFER AS TO ITS APPLICATION.”

    The bottom line….

    WHAT IS VAGUENESS AND OVERBREADTH, deserves another posting on my website.


  • The Foreign Corruption of the Clinton’s

    What Does “Anything of Value” Mean?
    Defined as a violation of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
     page 14 of a 130 page document (link Below)
     —————————————–
    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a critically important statute for combating CORRUPTION I.E. CRIMINAL- FRAUD  around the world.
    ———————————————-
     What Does
    “Anything of Value” Mean
    to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
     To the 311 million American Citizens affected by the Clinton’s corrupt foreign practices in the Clinton’s Pay to Play Foundation
    AND, the FBI criminal investigation into the  Hillary’s emails?
    —————————————————–

    What Does “Anything of Value” Mean to the Federal Bureau of Investigation? FBI Comey, reopened Hillary’s criminal email investigation., The  justification for reopening the  investigation? The Release of 650,000  Huma, Weiner and Hillary connected emails.

    ———————————————————–

    WHAT DOES
    “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN
    TO  THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  AND TO  312 MILLION AMERICAN CITIZENS ?
    —————————————————————-
    What Does “ANYTHING OF VALUE” and “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” Mean?
    To the Clinton Pay to Play Foundation?
    ———————————————————-
    Defined as a violation of The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
     —————————–
    In enacting the FCPA, Congress recognized that bribes
    can come in many shapes and sizes—a broad range of unfair
    benefits—and so the statute prohibits the corrupt “offer,
    payment, promise to pay, or authorization of the payment of
    any money, or offer, gift, promise to give, or authorization of
    the giving of anything of value to” a foreign official.
     ———————————-
    An improper benefit can take many forms. While
    cases often involve payments of cash(sometimes in the
    guise of “consulting fees” or “commissions” given through
    intermediaries),others have involved travel expenses and
    expensive gifts. Like the domestic bribery statute, the FCPA
    does not contain a minimum threshold amount for corrupt
    gifts or payments.
     ————————————
    In addition, a number of FCPA enforcement actions
    have involved the corrupt payment of travel and entertainment expenses. Both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) where these types of expenditures occurred in conjunction with other conduct reflecting systemic bribery or other clear indicia of corrupt intent
     ————————————
    Charitable Contributions
    Companies often engage in charitable giving as part
    of legitimate local outreach. The FCPA does not prohibit
    charitable contributions or prevent corporations from acting
    as good corporate citizens.Companies, however, cannot use the pretense of charitable contributions as a way to funnel bribes to government officials.
    ————————————————————————-
    WHAT DOES “ANYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN?
    TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) LORETTA LYNCH, EXERCISE DISCRETION IN DECIDING WHICH CASES PROMOTE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES AND JUSTIFY INVESTIGATION?
    ————————————-

    WHAT DOES “ANYTHING OF VALUE” AND “EVERYTHING OF VALUE” MEAN?

    TO DOJ LORETTA LYNCH IT MEANS PROTECTING THE FOREIGN  AND INTERNAL CORRUPTION OF  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY, THE CLINTON’S,  THE DEMOCRATS AND THE DNC. period
    ————————————————————————

    This is the 130 page resource guide to Foreign corruption I.E. criminal-fraud

    A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

    https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2015/01/16/guide.pdf

    Jan 16, 2015 – criminal/fraud/fcpa and www.sec.gov/spotlight/fcpa.shtml. … Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a critically important statute for combating corruption around the … Department, Agency, or Instrumentality of a Foreign Government.

    ————————————————————————————
    Just asking? Just Saying…read it… You decide.
    Law Enforcement Partners in  Corruption? Crime? or Conflict?
    —————————————————————–

    Law Enforcement Partners (page 5 of 130)

    Foreign corruption I.E. criminal-fraud 
    DOJ’s  FCPA Unit regularly works WITH the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to investigate potential FCPA violations.
    The FBI’s International Corruption Unit has primary responsibility for international corruption and fraud investigations and coordinates the FBI’s national FCPA enforcement program. The FBI also has a dedicated FCPA
    squad of FBI special agents (located in the Washington Field Office) that is responsible for investigating many, and providing support for all, of the FBI’s FCPA investigations.
    In addition, the Department of Homeland Security and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation regularly investigate potential FCPA violations.
    A number of other agencies are also involved in the fight against international
    corruption, including the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which has helped lead a number of FCPA investigation.
    ———————————————————————
    Foreign Corrupt Practices?
    If you see something, Say something….
    By E-Mail Report a FCPA Violation via Email to FCPA.Fraud@usdoj.gov
    —————————————————————————-

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | CRIMINAL-FRAUD | Department of …

    https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreigncorruptpracticesact

    Jul 20, 2016 – An Overview. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA”), was enacted for the purpose of …

    Contact us Regarding the FCPA By Mail Correspondence relating to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) may be sent to:U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Fraud Section
    ATTN: FCPA Coordinator Bond Building, 4th Floor 10th and Constitution Ave. NW
    Washington, DC 20530-0001By Fax Facsimile – 202-514-7021By E-Mail Report a FCPA Violation via Email to FCPA.Fraud@usdoj.gov

    U.S.C. sections amended‎: ‎15 U.S.C. ch. 2b § 7…
    Enacted by‎: ‎the 95th United States Congress
    Titles amended‎: ‎15 U.S.C.: Commerce and Tra…
    Statutes at Large‎: ‎91 Stat. 1494
    ————————————————————-
    Want more?
    The FCPA Unit maintains a “Spotlight on FCPA”
    section on SEC’s website at
    http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/
    fcpa.shtml
    . The website, which is updated regularly, provides general information about the Act, links to all SEC enforcement actions involving the FCPA, including both federal court actions and administrative proceedings, and contains other useful information

  • The Clinton’s Pay to Play Foundation

    THE CLINTON FOUNDATION Reminds me of the world’s oldest profession

    PROSTITUTION…..

    ALL IT TAKES TO “PAY AND PLAY” WITH THE CLINTON’S  ARE  PIMPS, JOHN’S AND PROSTITUTES ON AN INTERNATIONAL SCALE.

    Prostitution is illegal, often it is described as a “victimless crime”, or a “consensual crime”, BECAUSE IN THEORY, NO ONE PRESENT AT THE CRIME IS UNWILLING.

    ————————————————————————————-

    FBI RESTARTS THE CLINTON FOUNDATION “CORRUPTION” INVESTIGATION

    FBI CLINTON FOUNDATION PROBE FINDS ‘AVALANCHE’ OF CORRUPTION EVIDENCE AGAINST HER – BUT AGENTS FEAR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (DOJ) WILL STOP HILLARY FROM  GOING ON TRIAL

    THE FBI  HAS AT LEAST FOUR OTHER INVESTIGATIONS OPEN THAT INVOLVE THE CLINTONS AND THEIR CLOSE FRIENDS, AS WELL.

    WHY DOES THE FBI BOTHER WITH INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CLINTON’S?

    WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)  LORETTA LYNCH WILL NOT TAKE ACTION AND PROSECUTE UNDER US LAW?

    ———————————————————–

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | CRIMINAL-FRAUD | Department of …

    https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreigncorruptpracticesact

    Jul 20, 2016 – An Overview. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA“), was enacted for the purpose of …

    THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq. (“FCPA”), was enacted for the purpose of making it unlawful for certain classes of persons and entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business.

    ——————————————————-

    WHO INVESTIGATES THE  CORRUPTION OF US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DOJ?

    PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. PERIOD

    ————————————————————————— 

    Giuliani: Hillary & Obama Have ‘Completely Corrupted’ the State Dept, DOJ

    Nov 03, 2016 10:33pm

    ———————————————————————————-

    The division of duty between the FBI and attorneys at the Justice Department is usually clear. FBI agents investigate cases and will offer recommendations on whether to bring charges. Justice officials ultimately make that call.

    ————————————————————————

    Herridge: Abedin Told FBI She Notified WH Every Time Clinton Changed Emails

    Fox News Insider – 2 days ago … Clinton aide Huma Abedin in legal jeopardy, Catherine Herridge reported. … every time Hillary Clinton changed her email address to make sure his device would accept it.

    ———————————————————————————-

    The Justice Department’s Hillary Investigation Reeks Of Corruption

    thefederalist.com/2016/09/23/the-hillary-investigation-reeks-of-corruption/

    Sep 23, 2016 – According to an Associated Press report, the Justice Department reached criminal immunity deals with three of Hillary Clinton’s close advisers …

    ———————————————————————————

    JUNE 28, 2016, DOJ LORETTA LYNCH MEETS WITH BILL CLINTON

    But in the case of the Clinton email server investigation, that norm was upended in June after Lynch and former president Bill Clinton met on Lynch’s plane in Phoenix, just as the inquiry was in its final stages. Lynch described the meeting as “primarily social,” but she soon pledged that she would accept the recommendations of the FBI on the Clinton email probe.

    JUL 5, 2016 – F.B.I., JAMES B. COMEYNO CHARGES HILLARY

    ———————————————————————————

    BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children …

    True Pundit‎ – 2 days ago NYPD sources said Weiner or Abedin stored all the emails in a massive Microsoft Outlook program on the laptop. … could have been accessed, printed, discussed, leaked, …

    ——————————————————————————–

    I VOTED FOR TRUMP BECAUSE

    THE CLINTON’S PAY TO PLAY IS ILLEGAL

    THE CLINTON’S PAY TO PLAY COULD BE DISMISSED BY OBAMA’S DEPT OF JUSTICE  AS A “VICTIMLESS CRIME”, OR A “CONSENSUAL CRIME”, BECAUSE IN THEORY, NO ONE PRESENT AT THE CRIME IS UNWILLING.

    OR, ALL OF CLINTON’S CRIMES COULD BE DISMISSED BY OBAMA’S DEPT OF JUSTICE 

    THE PAY TO PLAY AND ALL OF HILLARY’S LIES TO CONGRESS ABOUT HER 33,000 DELETED, BLEACHED EMAILS AND HER ILLEGAL PRIVATE BASEMENT SERVER……

    BECAUSE, EVERYONE PRESENT AT THE CLINTON CRIMES HAS BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY OR TAKEN THE 5TH?

    ———————————————————-

    A TRUMP RALLY VIDEO IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS

    LIVE STREAM: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN ATKINSON, NH 11/4/16. …

    Right Side Broadcasting – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/user/rightsideradio

    LIVE STREAM: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN ATKINSON, NH 11/4/16. … FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2016: Live streaming coverage of the Donald Trump rally in Atkinson, NH at the Atkinson Country Club. … LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Atkinson,…

    ————————————————————–

    The bottom line

    ONLY PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

    WILL DRAIN THE CORRUPT WA DC SWAMP.


  • Trump Will Make America Safe Again

    Trump Americanization Not  Globalization

    Trump America first

    Trump make America strong  again

    Trump  a  land of Law and Order

    Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen.

    American voters will make it happen

    In 2017 President Donald J. Trump will make it happen

    Trumps  land of Law and Order.. in this order

    Trump make America safe again

    Trump make America strong  again

    Trump American citizens first

    Trump American jobs first

    Idle hands are the devil’s workshop

    The battle cry of the Republic 2015-2016

    Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump

    There are three kinds of people in this world: people who make it happen, people who watch what happens, and people who wonder what happened.

     Idle lips are the devils mouthpiece.

    WHO MADE THIS HAPPEN?

    Run, Hide, Fight Video – FBI

    https://www.fbi.gov/about…/runhidefight-video

    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

    secure the door. • Attempt … RUN. • Have an escape route and plan in mind. • Leave your belongings behind. • Keep your hands visible. 2. HIDE. • Hide in an area out of the shooter’s view. • Block entry to your hiding place and lock the doors … FIGHT. • As a last resort and only when your life is in imminent danger. • Attempt …

    WHO WATCHED  AND WONDERED WHEN THIS HAPPEN IN ORLANDO AND PARIS?

    IS ANYBODY ASKING, HOW THIS RUNNING, HIDING, BLOCKING AND LOCKING OUT… 

    WORKED  OUT TO COMBAT GLOBAL RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN GUN FREE ZONES?

    WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

     ———————————————————————————-

    LEARNING FROM A HISTORIC WINNER!

    WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS A FIGHTER AND WINNER

    NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER!

    WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

    TRUMP IS A FIGHTER AND A WINNER

    TRUMP WILL NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER

    One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER!

    WINSTON CHURCHILL

     ——————————————————————————

     WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

     HILLARY CLINTON IS THE 2016 DEMOCRATS PROGRESSIVE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

     WHO ARE OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATED LOSERS?

    WHO TURNED THEIR BACK ON BENGHAZI?

    WHO LIED THROUGH THEIR TEETH?

    WHO IS THE BIGGEST LIAR OF THEM ALL?

     HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY


    WHO TURNED THEIR BACKS ON AMERICANS?

    WHO RAN AWAY FROM RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS?

    WHO DOUBLED THE DANGER OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM?

    WHO RAN AWAY FROM EVERYTHING  MUSLIM JIHAD AND THE  ISLAMIC CELIPHATE

    WHO ARE OBAMA’S COWARDLY FLINCHERS?

    —————————————–

    JULY 23 2016

    WikiLeaks Release Over 19,000 Leaked Emails From The Democratic …

    www.breitbart.com/…/wikileaks-release-19000-leaked-emails-democrat…

    Breitbart News

    JUNE 21, 2016

    1 day ago – WikiLeaks have released 19252 leaked emails from the US Democratic National Committee today, IN THE LATEST OF THEIR DNC/CLINTON LEAKS. … Visitors to the site can navigate the nearly 20,000 emails and attachments by … a search bar that allows users to input keywords that may appear in the documents.

    JUNE 23, 2016

    VIDEO: Protester shouting ‘DNC leak!’ ejected from Hillary rally

    The American Mirror‎ – 2 hours ago

    ————————————————————–

    TEN YEARS OF WIKILEAKS 2006-2016

    Wikileaks is a self-described “not-for-profit media organization,” launched in 2006 for the purposes of disseminating original documents from anonymous sources and leakers.

    Julian Assange: Why the world needs WikiLeaks | TED Talk | TED.com

    —————————————————————–

    WikiLeaks 2010: A Glimpse of the Future? – Belfer Center for Science …

    Aug 10, 2011 – although WikiLeaks has been registered since 2006: There is one massive leak by a ….. October 22: Iraq War Logs, 391,832 documents released at once … As of January 11, 2011, 2,017 cables have been released with many…….

    ————————————————————-
    “Long before WikiLeaks was born, THE INTERNET HAD TRANSFORMED THE LANDSCAPE of journalism, creating a wide-open and global market with easier access to audiences and sources, a quicker metabolism, a new infrastructure for sharing and vetting information

    The Communist East German government, for example,

    QUICKLY REALIZED THAT  IT COULD NOT STOP ITS PEOPLE FROM WATCHING

    West German TELEVISION VIA SATELLITE.

    THE INTERNET EXPANDED THIS RANGE EVEN FURTHER FROM REGIONAL TO GLOBAL

    UNLESS A GOVERNMENT TAKES PROACTIVE STEPS TO LIMIT ACCESS AND CENSOR MATERIAL

    such as the People’s Republic of China’s Great Firewall.

    In the words of Philip J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman,

    “THE MARRIAGE OF THE DATA, THE TECHNOLOGY AND THE MEDIA YIELDS IMPACT THAT IS GLOBAL, NOT LOCAL.”

    MOREOVER, THE INTERNET HAS TRANSFORMED THE AUDIENCE FROM BEING MERELY A RECIPIENT TO A POTENTIAL PARTICIPANT IN THE ROLE OF A “CITIZEN JOURNALIST” E.G. BLOGGER

    ————————————————————————–

    INDEED, THE INTERNET HAS TRANSFORMED THE AUDIENCE FROM BEING

    MERELY A RECIPIENT, WHO WATCHED WHAT WAS  HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GLOBALLY, AND, WONDERING WHAT THE HELL WAS HAPPENING TO THE WORLD.

     TO THE TRANSFORMERS, THE POWER OF CYBERSPACE TRANSFORMED BY “CITIZEN JOURNALIST” E.G. BLOGGERS, SOCIAL MEDIA, FACEBOOK, TWITTER AND TWEETS, BECAME THE DOCUMENTED MEDIA REALITY SHOWING EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE USA AND GLOBALLY, AND, CONTINUES TO DOCUMENT

    EXACTLY WHO WAS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THE WORLD.

     HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY…

    ——————————————————————–

    The bottom line….

     IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND TECHNOLOGY

    BEFORE LYING’  HILLARY’S PRIVATE EMAIL  EUPHORIA

    BECAME THE GENERAL PUBLIC’S EUPHORIA

    AND ROCKED CROOKED HILLARY’S CRADLE OF POWER



  • Stayin’ Alive Matters

    Stayin’  Alive Matters

    Ah, ha, ha, ha, stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive MATTERS

    Whether you’re a brother or whether you’re a mother

    It’s alright and it’s OK, you can PROTEST and you can say

    BLACK LIVES MATTER and you can say

    I’ve been kicked around since I was born

    now that  all right and it’s OK

    We can try to understand

    ——————————————–

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT

    ————————————————-

    THE FACT THAT HUMANITY

    HAS TO CLARIFY THAT ANY LIVES MATTER

    SHOULD BE CONCERN ENOUGH…..

    ———————————————————

    INDEED IT SHOULD BE CONCERN ENOUGH…..

    BUT TO ADD TO THE CONCERN OF HUMANITY WE HAVE…

    PRESIDENT OBAMA’S CONTINUED  SUPPORT OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED DURING  BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS.

    Dallas Sniper Wanted to Kill White Cops, Black Protesters Say They …

    DALLAS — A sniper killed five police officers during a BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTEST….

    ————————————————

    The Washington Times – Tuesday, July 12, 2016

    Obama defends Black Lives Matter protests at police memorial in Dallas

    ———————————————————

    The Washington Times – Thursday, July 14, 2016

    ————————————————————-

    OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS  FOR KILLING COPS AT  THE DALLAS  BLACK LIVES MATTER RALLY

    DALLAS — A sniper killed five police officers during a BLACK LIVES MATTER MARCH

    During the standoff, Mr. Johnson, who was black, told police negotiators that “he was upset about BLACK LIVES MATTER ,” Chief Brown said. “He said he was upset about the recent police shootings. The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.”

    ————————————————-

    The Washington Times – Tuesday, July 12, 2016

    OPPORTUNITY KNOCKS FOR  President Obama to defended the Black Lives Matter movement Tuesday at a memorial service for five slain Dallas police officers, saying bigotry remains a problem in police departments across the U.S.

    President Obama defended the Black Lives Matter movement Tuesday at a memorial …

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, OUR PRESIDENT CONTINUOUSLY LEGITIMIZES THE GROUP.

     ———————————————————

    The Washington Times – Thursday, July 14, 2016

    Protesters with the Black Lives Matter movement argue with police to let them walk down the …

    As police departments across the country geared up for more Black Lives Matter demonstrations, the White House on Thursday called the street protests “a good thing.”

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, OUR PRESIDENT CONTINUOUSLY LEGITIMIZES THE GROUP.

    ———————————————————————————

    HISTORY MATTERS THIS IS A FACT OF CONCERN JULY 15, 2016

    PRESIDENT OBAMA’S UNDUE INFLUENCE ON THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, OUR PRESIDENT CONTINUOUSLY LEGITIMIZES THE GROUP.

    Obama Praises ‘Outstanding Work’ of Black Lives Matter Organizers at …

    Flanked by liberal legislators, and Black Lives Matter founders Brittany Packnett and DeRay Mckesson, President Obama told White House meeting of young militant leftists that they “are much better organizers” than he was at their age, and that he is “confident that they are going to take America to new heights.”

    ——————————-

    THE  OBAMA  EFFECT ON BLACK LIVES MATTER

    OBAMA WAS RIGHT… THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT HAS  TAKEN AMERICA TO A NEW VIOLENT RACIST COP KILLING HEIGHT AND IT HAS MADE HISTORY.

    JULY 6, 2016

    Dallas Sniper Wanted to Kill White Cops, Black Protesters Say They …

    www.thedailybeast.com/…/anger-swells-after-cops-shot-in-dallas.html

    The Daily Beast

    6 days ago – DALLAS — A sniper killed five police officers during a BLACK LIVES MATTER MARCH

      (CNN)Five Dallas police officers were killed in the deadliest incident for law enforcement in the United States since 9/11, according to statistics from the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund.

    A total of 11 officers were shot at a protest that took place Thursday against police brutality.

    ———————————————–

    JULY 7, 2016

    5 Police Officers Killed, 6 Wounded by Snipers in Dallas … – Breitbart

    www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/07/07/report-cops-shot-dallas-protest/

    FIVE DALLAS AREA POLICE OFFICERS HAVE BEEN KILLED AND SIX OTHERS INJURED … IN AT LEAST THREE STATES TODAY AFTER LAST NIGHT’S DALLAS POLICE MASSACRE: …

    —————————————————————————————-

    Obama’s Obscene Exploitation of the Dallas Massacre | Frontpage Mag

    www.frontpagemag.com/…/obamas-obscene-exploitation-dallas-…

    FrontPage Magazine

    2 days ago – Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. In Dallas, Obama …

    —————————————————————————

    Obama Thanks Black Lives Matter Leaders for Their ‘Outstanding Work’

    www.breitbart.com/…/obamathanksblacklivesmatterleadersoutstan

    Breitbart News

    Feb 21, 2016 – Flanked by liberal legislators, and Black Lives Matter founders Brittany Packnett and DeRay Mckesson, President Obama told White House …

    ——————————————————————

    BLACK LIVES MATTER documentation of their leaders outstanding organizational work

    Dec 13, 2014  THE  SHARPTON EFFECT ON BLACK LIVES MATTER

    Al Sharpton Leads March in DC as NYC Protesters Chant: ‘What Do …

     Dec 14, 2014

    Video Shows NYC Protesters Chanting for “Dead Cops” | NBC New York

    Dec 21, 2014

    Two NYPD cops ‘assassinated’ in Brooklyn ‘revenge’ killing – NY Daily …

     Aug 30, 2015

    Black Lives Matter Protesters Chant ‘Pigs In A Blanket, Fry ‘Em Like …

     Feb. 18, 2016

    Obama Praises ‘Outstanding Work’ of Black Lives Matter Organizers at …

    https://pjmedia.com/…/obamapraisesoutstandingwork-of-blacklivesmatte

    PJ Media

    Feb 19, 2016 – President Barack Obama speaks to the media at a meeting with civil rights leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, …

    President Barack Obama speaks to the media at a meeting with civil rights leaders in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 18, 2016. From left are the president Rep, John Lewis, D-Ga., Senior White House Adviser Valerie Jarrett, AL SHARPTON, Founder and President of the National Action Network, Sherrilyn Ifill, President of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and in the blue vest is Deray McKesson, Co-Founder of We the Protestors and Campaign Zero. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

    President Barack Obama met with civil rights leaders on Thursday afternoon to discuss issues such as criminal justice reform and building trust between the police and the communities they serve.

    The list of invitees included representatives from the NAACP, Black Lives Matter, and the National Urban League, as well as University of Missouri student organizer DeShaunya Ware and the Reverend Al Sharpton. Obama praised the Black Lives Matter leaders in attendance, saying they have “made history” and done “outstanding work.”

    ——————————————————————–

    The Obama Administration has legitimized Black Lives Matter.

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, OUR PRESIDENT CONTINUOUSLY LEGITIMIZES THE GROUP.

    As recent as February of this year, 2016, Mr. Obama invited race-hustlers and prominent Black Lives Matter figures such as Deray McKesson to speak about race at the White House. He reportedly told McKesson and the other so-called “activists” that they have done “outstanding work” and “made history.” 

    “We’ve got some young people here who are making history as we speak.”

    Barack Obama, praising BLACK LIVES MATTER SUPPORTERS

    “We’ve got some young people here who are making history as we speak,” said Obama.

    “People like Brittany [Packnett] who served on our Police Task Force

    IN THE WAKE OF FERGUSON AND HAS LED MANY OF THE PROTESTS THAT TOOK PLACE THERE AND SHINED A LIGHT ON THE INJUSTICE THAT WAS HAPPENING.

     People like Deray McKesson who has done some

    OUTSTANDING WORK MOBILIZING IN BALTIMORE AROUND THESE ISSUES — AND TO SEE GENERATIONS WHO ARE CONTINUING TO WORK ON BEHALF OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY and economic opportunity is greatly encouraging to me.”

    OF COURSE, THE LEFT AS A WHOLE, DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HILLARY CLINTON AND BERNIE SANDERS AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AT LARGE, HAVE ALSO PITCHED IN TO LEGITIMIZE AND PANDER TO THE HATE GROUP. 

    —————————————-

    THE  SHARPTON EFFECT ON BLACK LIVES MATTER

    Dec 13, 2014

    Al Sharpton Leads March in DC as NYC Protesters Chant: ‘What Do …

    www.breitbart.com/…/al-sharpton-leads-thousands-in-saturday-march-…

    Breitbart News

    Dec 13, 2014 – But even though it was his event, many attendees didn’t want to hear from ORGANIZER AL SHARPTON. ... Similar protests wracked New York, where protesters allegedly assaulted two NYPD officers and blocked traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge. Protesters chanted violent slogans: “What do we

    —————————————————————————

    Dec 14, 2014

    Video Shows NYC Protesters Chanting for “Dead Cops” | NBC New York

    www.nbcnewyork.com/…/Eric-Garner-Manhattan-DeadCops-Video-Millions-…

    WNBC

    Dec 14, 2014 – Video Shows NYC Protesters Chanting for “Dead Cops” … apparently yelling out in unison “What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it?

    —————————————————————————–

    Dec 21, 2014  THE  SHARPTON EFFECT?

    Two NYPD cops ‘assassinated’ in Brooklyn ‘revenge’ killing – NY Daily …

    www.nydailynews.com/…/copsshot-brooklyn-sources-article-1…
    New York Daily News

    Dec 21, 2014Two NYPD cops were executed Saturday after a gang member from Baltimore drove to NYC to kill police officers after wounding his girlfriend. … Bratton said the two cops “were shot and killed with no warning, no provocation.

    ———————————————————————

    Aug 30, 2015

    Black Lives Matter Protesters Chant ‘Pigs In A Blanket, Fry ‘Em Like …

    ▶ 0:25

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xNxoeqf0Ws

    Aug 31, 2015 – Uploaded by Yankee Apocalypse

    August 30, 2015 – Police Chief Slams ‘Black Lives Matter’ Chant calling for killing Police Officers as …

    —————————————————

    Sep 2, 2015THE LEADER BEHIND THE “PIGS IN A BLANKET, FIRE THEM LIKE BACON” CHANT AT A #BLACKLIVESMATTER PROTEST SAID THE CHANT WAS MEANT TO BE PLAYFUL

    Sep 2, 2015  THE CHANTS WERE  MEANT TO BE PLAYFUL

    #BlackLivesMatter: ‘Pigs in a Blanket’ Chant Was ‘Playful’ | Mediaite

    www.mediaite.com/…/blacklivesmatter-leader-pigs-in-a-blanket-chant-was-ju…

    Mediaite

    ——————————————————————-

    5 Things You Need To Know About Black Lives Matter | Daily Wire

    www.dailywire.com/…/5-things-you-need-know-about-black-lives-matter-amanda-pr…

    3 days ago – Black Lives Matter has explicitly called for dead cops and the “lynching” of white … BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTERS CHANTWhat do we want? Dead …

    ————————————————————————-

    Whether you’re a brother or whether you’re a mother

    When you feel the city breakin’ and everybody shootin’,

    and you can say black on black killing is pass’e

    And you just  look the other way

    That’s NOT alright and it’s NOT  OK

    ———————————————————

    DESPITE ALL THE RACIST, HATEFUL ACTS COMMITTED AND PROMOTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, OUR PRESIDENT CONTINUOUSLY LEGITIMIZES THE GROUP.

    OF COURSE, THE LEFT AS A WHOLE, DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HILLARY CLINTON AND BERNIE SANDERS AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AT LARGE, HAVE ALSO PITCHED IN TO LEGITIMIZE AND PANDER TO THE HATE GROUP. 

    ————————————————————————

    The bottom line

    I STAND WITH TRUMP  ALL LIVES MATTER

    THE FACT THAT HUMANITY HAS TO CLARIFY THAT

     ANY LIVES MATTER SHOULD BE CONCERN ENOUGH

    —————————————————————-

    Just saying…

    White men can’t jump

    But… They sure can sing…

    Stayin’ Alive

    Bee Gees

    Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk
    I’m a woman’s man: no time to talk
    Music loud and women warm,

    I’ve been kicked around
    Since I was born
    And now it’s all right, it’s OK
    And you may look the other way
    We can try to understand
    The New York Times’ effect on man

    Whether you’re a brother or whether you’re a mother
    You’re stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive
    Feel the city breakin’ and everybody shakin’


    And we’re stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive
    Ah, ha, ha, ha, stayin’ alive, stayin’ alive
    Ah, ha, ha, ha, stayin’ alive

    Well now, I get low and I get high
    And if I can’t get either, I really try
    Got the wings of heaven on my shoes
    I’m a dancin’ man and I just can’t lose
    You know it’s all right, it’s ok
    I’ll live to see another day
    We can try to understand


  • Orlando Terrorist DOJ Redacted Truth?

    Liberals never allow TRUTH or FACTS to get in the way of their agenda.
    Obama’s DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE  just Redacts the Truth About Whatever.
    ——————————-
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/…/president-obama-and-attorney-general-loretta…

    2 days ago – The numerous leaks from within the FBI investigation of Orlando are … The FBI launched an investigation into Mateen after Sheriff’s Office officials …. Also, it is difficult to see how the OPD can be forced to redact any transcripts it has. … Truth, rule of law and protection of innocent Americans is tossed aside …

    And they need to hide it, big time.

    It is not accidental that Loretta Lynch was featured on all five major broadcasts for the Sunday news cycle (Topic Orlando Terrorism).  You might well remember the last time a key administration official named Susan Rice met with an almost identical Sunday schedule (Topic BENGHAZI Terrorism).

    loretta 6

    General Lynch’s Sunday talk visibility is yet another example of the Obama administration’s risk management reference manual, The Obfuscation Playbook.

    The difference between Rice’s 2012 appearance and Lynch’s 2016 version is: this time we know the play.  We also know exactly what the administration risk is, even IF the media won’t discuss it, it is explained in the link above.

    ——————————————————————————-

    GOP Rep. On 911 Redaction: ‘How In The ___ Does Censoring This …

    netnebraska.org/node/1029141
    THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE?
    THE  LATEST  RELEASE ON THE DOJ UN-REDACTED TRUTH
     THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ALLOWS PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT
    ALL HEAVILY CENSORED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    ALL EDITED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OMITS  ALL REFERENCE TO RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS
    ————————————————————————–
    —————————————————————————–

    Obama: The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhFB7-w2MY8
    Nov 6, 2011 – Uploaded by trscoop1

    Obama: The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.

    ————————————————————————————–

    DOJ Will Censor All References To Islamic Terrorism From Orlando …

    www.zerohedge.com/…/doj-will-censor-all-references-islamic-terrorism-o
    Zero Hedge

    1 day ago – So it’s best to just protect the public’s tender ears and just censor said … Lynch: “Partial Transcript” Of Orlando 911 Calls Will Have …. Yep, the Ministry of Truth will decide what we serfs get to hear… since we … since they have already said the transcript will be redacted, they …. He still toes the party line.

    ———————————————————————————-

    FBI Releases Censored Orlando 911 Call Transcripts | Zero Hedge

    www.zerohedge.com/…/fbi-releases-censoredorlando-911-call-transcripts
    Zero Hedge

    1 day ago – FBI Releases Censored Orlando 911 Call Transcripts … 911 transcripts however only after heavy edits which censor and remove all references to Islamic terrorism. …. The actual unredacted transcript said this: …. if you read it from the nbc site it is just omitted and not hello kitty but still.. we are doomed.

    ———————————————————

    image: http://therealside.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/OBAMA-transparency-.jpg


    Read more at http://therealside.com/2014/09/the-new-meaning-of-the-word-transparency/#o8jbtggEII8xzA4X.99

    Obama: The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhFB7-w2MY8
    Nov 6, 2011 – Uploaded by trscoop1

    Obama: The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.

    Press Release – Obama Pledges Most Transparent and Accountable …Aug 15, 2007 –

    OBAMA’S  MOST OPEN AND TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENT IN HISTORY,

    NEVER ALLOWS TRUTH OR FACTS TO GET IN THE WAY OF THEIR LIBERAL AGENDA.

  • Hillary’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors?

    Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    by Jon Roland, Constitution Society

    —————————————————-

    Posted under my right to freedom of speech

    Just asking? Just saying…

    What’s going on with the FBI criminal investigation with Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a home email server? The FBI has been quiet, but now we have learned it’s for good reason! As sources inform Fox News’ Catherine Herridge (below), Hillary Clinton is about to be in serious trouble!

     As Rep. Mike Pompeo, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News:

    “I can assure you the intelligence committee is working on determining the scope of any breaches that may have resulted from the improper handling of classified information, and the damage assessments that go with them. I think we all understand that we had classified information in channels that weren’t secure on Secretary Clinton’s homebrew server and that risk was associated with that.”

    Then, Herridge explains how her sources are focused on how “federal regulations require damage assessments after classified information is outside secure government channels, such as a personal server.”

    Therefore, if Pompeo is correct, then the FBI is focused on determining internally what classified information was mishandled… Which it clearly was, as the documents included more than 22 emails that were “top secret and above.” Once that is investigation is complete, the FBI will have no other choice but to go after Hillary Clinton.

    —————————————————————

    “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    Posted on April 16, 2014 3:54 pm by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    by Jon Roland, Constitution Society

    ——————————————————————————————————-

    The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.

    I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word “high”. It does not mean “more serious”. It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under

    and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

    Under the English common law tradition, crimes were defined through a legacy of court proceedings and decisions that punished offenses not because they were prohibited by statutes, but because they offended the sense of justice of the people and the court. Whether an offense could qualify as punishable depended largely on the obligations of the offender, and the obligations of a person holding a high position meant that some actions, or inactions, could be punishable if he did them, even though they would not be if done by an ordinary person.

    Offenses of this kind survive today in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It recognizes as punishable offenses such things as perjury of oath, refusal to obey orders, abuse of authority, dereliction of duty, failure to supervise, moral turpitude, and conduct unbecoming. These would not be offenses if committed by a civilian with no official position, but they are offenses which bear on the subject’s fitness for the duties he holds, which he is bound by oath or affirmation to perform.

    Perjury is usually defined as “lying under oath”. That is not quite right. The original meaning was “violation of one’s oath (or affirmation)”.

    The word “perjury” is usually defined today as “lying under oath about a material matter”, but that is not its original or complete meaning, which is “violation of an oath”. We can see this by consulting the original Latin from which the term comes. From An Elementary Latin Dictionary, by Charlton T. Lewis (1895), Note that the letter “j” is the letter “i” in Latin.

    periurium, i, n,, a false oath, perjury. periurus, adj., oath-breaking, false to vows, perjured. iuro, avi, atus, are, to swear, take an oath. iurator, oris, m., a swearer. iuratus, adj., sworn under oath, bound by an oath. ius, iuris, that which is binding, right, justice, duty. per, … IV. Of means or manner, through, by, by means of, … under pretense of, by the pretext of, ….

    By Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, the president must swear: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” He is bound by this oath in all matters until he leaves office. No additional oath is needed to bind him to tell the truth in anything he says, as telling the truth is pursuant to all matters except perhaps those relating to national security. Any public statement is perjury if it is a lie, and not necessary to deceive an enemy.

    When a person takes an oath (or affirmation) before giving testimony, he is assuming the role of an official, that of “witness under oath”, for the duration of his testimony.

    That official position entails a special obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and in that capacity, one is punishable in a way he would not be as an ordinary person not under oath. Therefore, perjury is a high crime.

    An official such as the president does not need to take a special oath to become subject to the penalties of perjury. He took an oath, by Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States” and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” to the best of his ability. While he holds that office, he is always under oath, and lying at any time constitutes perjury if it is not justified for national security.

    Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr erred in presenting in his referral only those offenses which could be “laid at the feet” of the president. He functioned like a prosecutor of an offense against criminal statutes that apply to ordinary persons and are provable by the standards of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”. That is not to say that such offenses are not also high crimes or misdemeanors when committed by an official bound by oath. Most such offenses are. But “high crimes and misdemeanors” also includes other offenses, applicable only to a public official, for which the standard is “preponderance of evidence”. Holding a particular office of trust is not a right, but a privilege, and removal from such office is not a punishment. Disablement of the right to hold any office in the future would be a punishment, and therefore the standards of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” would apply before that ruling could be imposed by the Senate.

    It should be noted, however, that when an offense against a statute is also a “high crime or misdemeanor”, it may be, and usually is, referred to by a different name, when considered as such. Thus, an offense like “obstruction of justice” or “subornation of perjury” may become “abuse of authority” when done by an official bound by oath. As such it would be grounds for impeachment and removal from office, but would be punishable by its statutory name once the official is out of office.

    An executive official is ultimately responsible for any failures of his subordinates and for their violations of the oath he and they took, which means violations of the Constitution and the rights of persons.

    It is not necessary to be able to prove that such failures or violations occurred AT HIS INSTIGATION OR WITH HIS KNOWLEDGE, to be able, in Starr’s words, to “lay them at the feet” of the president. It is sufficient to show, on the preponderance of evidence, that the president was aware of misconduct on the part of his subordinates, OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN, and failed to do all he could to remedy the misconduct, including termination and prosecution of the subordinates and compensation for the victims or their heirs.

    The president’s subordinates include everyone in the executive branch, and their agents and contractors. It is not limited to those over whom he has direct supervision. He is not protected by “PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY”. He is legally responsible for everything that everyone in the executive branch is doing.

     

    Therefore, the appropriate subject matter for an impeachment and removal proceeding is the full range of offenses against the Constitution and against the rights of persons committed by subordinate officials and their agents which have not been adequately investigated or remedied.

    The massacre at Waco, the assault at Ruby Ridge, and many, many other illegal or excessive assaults by federal agents, and the failure of the president to take action against the offenders, is more than enough to justify impeachment and removal from office on grounds of dereliction of duty.

    To these we could add the many suspicious incidents that indicate covered up crimes by federal agents, including the suspicious deaths of persons suspected of being knowledgeable of wrongdoing by the president or others in the executive branch, or its contractors.

    The impeachment and removal process should be a debate on the entire field of proven and suspected misconduct by federal officials and agents under this president, and if judged to have been excessive by reasonable standards, to be grounds for removal, even if direct complicity cannot be shown.

    Home » Selection & Removal » Impeachment
    Original URL: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm | Text Version
    Maintained: Jon Roland of the Constitution Society
    Original date: 1999/01/1616 —  Last updated: 2013/8/30

     

    This entry was posted in FREEDOM OF SPEECH, Government Accountability, Hello Congress is anybody home?, IGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE, Oath To Defend The US Constitution, Politically Ignored.


  • U.S.A. Becoming a Police State?

    Who’s to keep AMERICA  from becoming a police state?

    Angry American Voters

    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WERE ANGRY LONG BEFORE DONALD TRUMP DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

    Everybody in the U.S.A. IS ANGRY OR OFFENDED  BY SOMETHING AND/OR SOMEBODY.

    WHO’S ANGRY AND WHO’S VIOLENT?

    MANY ANGRY, OFFENDED PEOPLE  RESORTED TO VIOLENCE, KILLING COPS, ARSON  LOOTING, AND DISRUPTING.

    ————————————————————-

    WHO’S ANGRY? AND WHO’S VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP?

    GO FIGURE….

    DONALD TRUMPS 2015-2016 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FROM THE  CORRUPTING  INFLUENCE OF POLITICO ESTABLISHMENTS SUPER PACTS POLITICAL $$$$$ CONTRIBUTIONS .

    DONALD TRUMP CAN NOT BE BOUGHT AND HE WILL NOT SELL  AMERICAN CITIZENS OUT TO ANY COUNTRY OR ESTABLISHMENT.

    What’s to STOP AMERICA  from becoming a police state?

    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES AND DONALD TRUMP, SHALL  ACT AND VOTE FOR THE RESTORATION OF  THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America…

    ———————————————–

    AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    DONALD TRUMP HAS PLEDGED   …

    RESTORATION OF JUSTICE

    ———————————————-

    Just asking? Just saying…. Would that pledged include?

    NO MORE AG LYNCHING OF AMERICAN CITIZENS

    ———————————————————

    ALL LIVES MATTER

    APPOINTING CONSERVATIVE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
    —————-

    RESTORATION OF DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY,

    —————————————

    RESTORATION OF LAW AND ORDER

    ——————————————-
    RESTORATION OF THE COMMON DEFENSE,  PROTECTING AMERICAN CITIZENS FROM THEIR OWN U.S. GOVERNMENT, TERRORISTS  AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

    ———————–
    RESTORATION OF THE GENERAL WELFARE, STATE SOVEREIGNTY, ALL LIVES MATTER, BRINGING JOBS BACK TO AMERICA, VETS LIVES MATTER, STATE CONTROLLED EDUCATION FOR OUR CHILDREN.

    ———————————
    RESTORATION TO SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES, THE BLESSING OF ONE NATION UNDER GOD, REBUILDING THE MILITARY

    ——————————
    RESTORATION OF OUR POSTERITY, ECONOMIC, BUILDING A FENCE, CLOSING DOWN THE BOARDERS,  STOP THE GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND GIVING PUBLIC LAND BACK TO THE PEOPLE
    —————————————————————————————

    WHO’S ANGRY AND WHO’S VIOLENT?

    As an informed citizen, I consider the following case to be one of the biggest domestic (homeland security) threats to American liberty.

    The Guardian1 day ago
    County Sheriff Nelson said Finicum was struck in the back by three of the bullets, which were fired by state troopers who were behind him as he appeared to reach for a weapon.
    Shooting death of LaVoy Finicum justified, necessary, prosecutor says
    shows that the three fatal shots , fired by Oregon State Police were justified “and, in fact, necessary”
     To see and hear what it was like to have been in the vehicle, watch this video:
    It has created a new American awakening from both the Left and the Right. It “shocks our conscience.”

    Dramatic video from inside Finicum’s vehicle – The Westerner

    thewesterner.blogspot.com/…/dramaticvideo-from-insidefinicums.html

    12 hours ago – Dramatic video from inside Finicum’s vehicle. Footage released by Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office Tuesday shows the moment that Robert …

    The American people are outraged at this inhumanity, this brutality and barbarism by the courts and law enforcement.

    ————————————————————–

    APPOINTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES?

    Utah v Strieff Oral Argument | Video | C-SPAN.org

    www.c-span.org/video/?404140-1/utahvstriefforalargument

     0:345 on the video.

    Feb 2, 2016 oral statement that Justice Sotomayor

    Reasonable cause? Probable cause in the course of a police stop?

    What’s to keep us from becoming a police state?

    ————————————————————-
    WHO’S TO KEEP AMERICA FROM BECOMING A POLICE STATE?
    VOTING AMERICAN CITIZENS WERE ANGRY LONG BEFORE DONALD TRUMP DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.
    ——————————————————————–

    JEANETTE FINICUM RESPONDS TO OREGON STATE AND FBI INVESTIGATIVE REPORT

    According to the news story from Portland Oregon: “Officials investigating the death of Robert [LaVoy] Finicum are ready to release results” of the fatal shooting “during a Jan. 26 traffic stop while trying to arrest the rancher and others involved in the takeover of an Oregon wildlife refuge.”

    ———————————————————————————–

    NEWS RELEASE
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact: Cherilyn Bacon Eagar
    for the LaVoy Finicum family
    Cell: 801-592-4245
    Email: Cherilyn@CherilynEagar.com

    March 8, 2016, St. George, UT.
    — LaVoy Finicum’s wife Jeanette Finicum released this statement at a news conference in St. George, Utah:
    The news conference held earlier today in Bend, Oregon to release the report of the investigation regarding my husband’s death was to be expected. No surprises. The purpose of that announcement was for state and federal agencies to continue to lay the foundation of their legal case.
    However, they also continue to bring forward selective evidence. As in all such situations there is another side to this story. We will provide a more thorough analysis at a follow up news conference tomorrow and will be taking questions at that time. Meanwhile, we continue to maintain my husband’s innocence.
    According to the news story from Portland Oregon: “Officials investigating the death of Robert [LaVoy] Finicum are ready to release results” of the fatal shooting “during a Jan. 26 traffic stop while trying to arrest the rancher and others involved in the takeover of an Oregon wildlife refuge.”
    As a family, along with our lawyers, we deny this statement. This was not a traffic stop. It was an ambush with a roadblock placed on a blind curve along a lonely stretch of highway. I am told that in law enforcement and prosecuting circles this is called a “Deadman’s blockade,” and is designed to allow a “kill stop” which is illegal.
    The news story continues: “The FBI said Finicum was shot after reaching for a gun…”. We reject that statement. The FBI’s aerial video was of poor quality, edited and provided no audio. Our family asserts that he was shot with both hands up, he was not reaching for anything at the time of the first shot. He was walking with his hands in the air, a symbol of surrender. When he reached down to his left hip he was reacting to the pain of having been shot.
    I can hardly believe that a team of qualified law officers could look at the facts in this case and say that no criminal laws were violated.
    How could they have reached this decision in the face of evidence that clearly shows intent to kill my husband?
    We have talked with an independent investigator who has stated that the “video proves a set up assassination.”
    Many people, including my lawyers, have tried to prepare me for this—-“be strong”, “accept this with peace” —–but I don’t think anything could prepare me to accept what is so clearly a finding that challenges the Constitution that my husband died defending.
    I know that under the Constitution the men who shot my husband to death, while he was surrendering, are entitled to due process of law—-but they are not entitled to walk free and not have to face the same legal process that is a barrier to you or to me.
    They shot my husband, they left him lying in the snowbank—no medical assistance, no charges, no arraignment, no preliminary hearing, no indictment, and no trial by a jury, — and should they just walk free? It just is not right.
    The consolation I have is that hundreds of thousands of Americans have seen and know the truth and believe as I do that my husband was murdered “intentionally, deliberately and with malice.”
    My lawyer has assured me that we will seek justice in a different court, under different circumstances—and I look forward to the day when these men do face a jury that is unbiased enough to return a fair verdict.
    After the Finicum funeral, rallies spontaneously began to organize in many states. The organizers counted, possibly as many as 300 rallies took place throughout the country, in every state but Rhode Island.
    It has been asked how this movement got such momentum so quickly. When Americans heard the details of this story and how these American patriots who have no criminal record and who have stood on the same interpretation of the US Constitution as Justice Scalia have been treated, the actions of law enforcement and the FBI have “shock [ed] the conscience.” Our Supreme Court has set as the standard guideline for practices of law enforcement that are unacceptable to our society, as those that “shock the conscience”.
    A Deadman’s blockade with the intent to kill “shocks the conscience.” Shooting to kill with both hand up “shocks the conscience.”
    Violating the 8th Amendment – cruel and unusual punishment – by placing Americans with no criminal records, who are apparently guilty of defending the US Constitution and the overreach of federal authorities, into solitary confinement and then removing their constitutional right to bear arms are two examples of how elected and appointed officials in the court system, legislative bodies and in law enforcement are violating the Constitution they swear to uphold.
    The Supreme Court has referred to solitary confinement as being “violently insane.” The court has recognized that solitary confinement tortures our human brain and diminishes our God given strength to overcome obstacles.
    Solitary confinement is a form of torture that often drives prisoners mad.
    Last year a Supreme Court Justice wrote a concurring opinion that described the history of solitary confinement and said the practice bears a “peculiar mark of infamy” in its ability to shatter the minds and spirits of prisoners.
    Who are we? We are outraged that men and women who have no criminal records and who posed no threat during the protest in Oregon are being treated as mere animals.
    The American people are outraged at this inhumanity, this brutality and barbarism by the courts and law enforcement. It has created a new American awakening from both the Left and the Right. It “shocks our conscience.” And that is why around 300 rallies spontaneously organized in support of my husband’s assassination and these patriots who are being held as political prisoners.
    Again, my lawyer has assured me that we will seek justice in a different court, under different circumstances—
    We will be commenting on the FBI’s and Deschutes County press release tomorrow after we review their findings fully.
    Thank you.

    Bottom line

    ARE YOU ANGRY NOW? ARE YOU VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP?


  • Statistics Facts Fraud and Justice?

    Statistics Facts Fraud and Justice?

    To Rep. Kilmer and Senators Cantwell and Murray

    Audit: 6.5 Million on Social Security Are Over 112 Years Old

    INDEED,  SOMEONE IS COMMITTING FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY

    —————————–

    2015 STATISTICS , FACTS

    Audit: 6.5 Million on Social Security Are Over 112 Years Old

    www.newsmax.com/US/ssa-audit-millions-dead/2015/03/10/id/629253

    An audit of the Social Security Administration shows some 6.5 million people on the agency’s rolls are 112 or older, raising the ire of Homeland Security Committee …

    As of 5 APRIL 2015, the GRG lists 16 verified living supercentenarians . The GRG lists people as living supercentenarians if their age has been “validated” and they have been confirmed to be alive within the past year. In addition, 15 Americans listed are considered “pending” and 25 “unverified.”

    ————————-

    WHAT ARE YOU, AS MY FEDERALLY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES DOING ABOUT THE 6.5 MILLION PEOPLE THAT ARE COMMITTING FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY?

    What Congressional oversight  has been provided? to, by and for  “We the People”?

    What good is Congressional oversight?  if it’s  not used to Protect “We the People”?

    Congressional oversight refers to oversight by the United States Congress on the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.

    ———————————————————————————–

    Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse | Office of the Inspector …

    oig.ssa.gov/r

    Do you suspect someone of committing fraud, waste, or abuse against Social Security? The Social Security Fraud Hotline takes reports of alleged fraud, waste, and abuse

    ——————————————————————————————————–

     2013 STATISTICS , FACTS

    Widespread fraud reported in Social Security …

    www.foxnews.com/…/08/widespread-fraud-reported-in-social-security

    Oct 08, 2013 · A two-year investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has found widespread fraud in the Social Security Administration‘s … The fraud is so rampant, and disability cases have so proliferated in recent years, that the Social Security’s Disability Trust Fund may run out of money in only 18 months, says Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., whose office undertook the investigation. Coburn told CBS’s “60 Minutes” that

    CONN’S LEGAL FATE IS NOW IN THE HANDS OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. 

     ————————————————————————

    WHAT ARE YOU, AS MY FEDERALLY ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES DOING TO PROTECT THE SOCIAL SECURITY’S DISABILITY TRUST FUND?   HAS JUSTICE BEEN SERVED?

    ————————————————————–

     report fraud – Social Security

    www.socialsecurity.gov/fraudreport/oig/public_fraud_reporting/form.htm

    The Office of the Inspector General proactively seeks new ways to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in the Social Security Administration‘s programs …

    WHAT HAS/IS  THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DONE WITH   THE DETECTED  ABOUT  6.5 MILLION PEOPLE THAT ARE COMMITTING FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY?

    WHAT HAS/IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DONE? WITH OR ABOUT  THE SOCIAL SECURITY’S DISABILITY FRAUD THAT IS SO RAMPANT, AND DISABILITY CASES THAT HAVE SO PROLIFERATED IN RECENT YEARS, THAT THE SOCIAL SECURITY’S DISABILITY TRUST FUND MAY RUN OUT OF MONEY?

    What Congressional oversight  has been provided? to, by and for  “We the People”?

    Congressional oversight refers to oversight by the United States Congress on the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.

    —————————————————————————————

    2013 STATISTICS , FACTS

    Behind My Back | My Social Security Audit?

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/06/02/my-social-security-audit

    email COMMENT TO DEREK KILMER ON MY SOCIAL SECURITY AUDIT. Derek, I got a letter from the Social Security Administration yesterday. After two and a half …

    ——————————————————————————————————-

    My elected representative Derek Kilmer is an advocate for senior citizens.

    Please visit his website for Senior Citizens’ Resources

    The following information is for Senior Citizens. PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE FOR ASSISTANCE WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS YOU MAY HAVE.

    REP. DEREK KILMER DID ASSIST ME WITH MY SOCIAL SECURITY AUDIT

    ————————————————————————————————————————-

    Working to Protect and Support our Seniors

    Representative Kilmer is working to keep Social Security strong and opposes proposals to privatize this vital safety net program. Our nation has an obligation to take care of our older Americans.  As the grandson of a 104-year-old widow, he knows it is essential that we are helping vulnerable populations live WITH DIGNITY.

    ———————————————–

    PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE FOR PROBLEMS YOU MAY HAVE.

    I have a problem with this…

    Increasing number of US seniors living in poverty – World …

    www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/03/26/seni-m26.html

    Increasing number of US seniors living in poverty … plunging into poverty. Many elderly Americans are being … of senior citizens living in poverty is the …

    By Niles Williamson
    26 March 2013

    America’s senior citizens are taking on increasing amounts of debt and plunging into poverty. MANY ELDERLY AMERICANS ARE BEING FORCED out of retirement or are working well into their retirement years to cover their debts, living expenses, and health care needs.

     —————————————————————————————————————

    2002 STATISTICS , FACTS

    I have a problem with this…

    USATODAY.com – Tax regulations frustrate many workers over …

    usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/bcovfri.htm

    Nov 28, 2002 · Tax regulations frustrate many workers over age 70. … Why they work. The threat of Social Security … “If you’re going to live to be 100 years old, …

    Baby boomers with skimpy pensions, rising health care costs and portfolios mauled by the bear market fully expect to work in their retirement years — 71% of them, a recent survey by Allstate says. Nearly half said they expect to keep working because they’ll need the income.

    —————

    Representative Kilmer knows it is essential that we are helping vulnerable populations live WITH DIGNITY.

     PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE FOR PROBLEMS YOU MAY HAVE.

    ——————————————————————————

    2008 STATISTICS , FACTS

    I have a problem with this…

    Older Workers: BLS Spotlight on Statistics

    www.bls.gov/spotlight/2008/older_workers

    Older workers Are there more older people in the workplace? … over the past 25 years the index for older Americans has risen an average of 3.3 percent each year, …

    But the most dramatic growth is projected for the two oldest groups. The number of workers between the ages of 65 and 74 and those aged 75 and up are predicted to soar by more than 80 percent. BY 2016, WORKERS AGE 65 AND OVER are expected to account for 6.1 percent of the total labor force, up sharply from their 2006 share of 3.6 percent.

    ——————————————————–

    PLEASE CONTACT MY OFFICE FOR PROBLEMS YOU MAY HAVE.

    I have a problem with this…

    Audit: 6.5 Million on Social Security Are Over 112 Years Old

    www.newsmax.com/US/ssa-audit-millions-dead/2015/03/10/id/629253

    An audit of the Social Security Administration shows some 6.5 million people on the agency’s rolls are 112 or older

    As of 5 APRIL 2015, the GRG lists 16 verified living supercentenarians,

    —————————————————–

    Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse | Office of the Inspector …

    oig.ssa.gov/r

    DO YOU SUSPECT SOMEONE OF COMMITTING FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY?

    ————————————————–

    INDEED,  SOMEONE IS COMMITTING FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY

    and, I am having a problem with this.

    SO, REP. KILMER, I AM CONTACTING YOUR  OFFICE WITH PROBLEMS I HAVE.  

    Your bottom line is, Improve Government Efficiency? If you see opportunities in which your tax dollars can be used more efficiently or effectively, let me know here.

    ————————————————————————————————

    My suggestion, please add this to your bottom line. ELIMINATE FRAUD, WASTE, OR ABUSE AGAINST SOCIAL SECURITY.

    Derek Kilmer
    Member of Congress

    —————————————————————————————–

    What good is Congressional oversight?  if it’s  not used to Protect “We the People”?

    Congressional oversight refers to oversight by the United States Congress on the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.