+menu-


  • Category Archives Document Gun Control
  • Terrorist Slaughters and Gun Control

    Subject:  IN COLD BLOOD

    Original Message (an email  I received today)

    1. KILMER My question would be: Why have you and our U.S. Senators in Washington State, sat on your hands, bathing in the cold blood of our U.S. citizens being murdered by Muslim’s? Particularly in GUN FREE ZONES! How dare the governments of OUR country vote to remove our second amendment right to protect our FAMILIES. In our supermarkets, department stores, movie theaters, sports events, airports, train & bus stations, our military bases and in Our OWN HOUSES on OUR OWN land. CLOSE the borders now sir! Islam has claimed WAR ON THE U.S. It’s time Congress did the same and hold OUR president accountable for the blood baths across the globe, as his democrat colleagues cheer him on. How many dead victims from Muslim attacks since 9/11? Piece by piece Mr. Kilmer the attacks on American soil continue and may have even surpassed the numbers that actually perished in the Trade Center tragedy. What is wrong in Olympia? Are you all enjoying the duck shoots rampaging across the country?
      Do something or please step down. All of you. Close the borders and STOP immigration and Refugees (?) from entering our country NOW! This is WAR! Our Congress is guilty of murder Mr. Kilmer. How many more men, women and children have to die because of your inaction? Do the job you were hired to do.

    OR THE BIGGER QUESTION IS DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT YOUR JOB IS?

    ——————————————————–

    For clarification and identification  of the  Washington  State elected Representatives in congress they are Rep. Derek Kilmer (D) and Senators Maria Cantwell (D) and Patty Murray (D)

    Orlando massacre JUST  ANOTHER radical Islamic terrorist attack on American Citizens

    JUST ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY for the liberals (D)  to “JUMP ON THE GUN CONTROL” in congress

    As a voting American citizen, I agree 100% with the questions, suggestions and conclusion in the above comment..

    ———————————————————

    I am compelled to ask an additional question

    DOES THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS  EVEN KNOW WHAT THEIR JOB IS?

    PREAMBLE CONSTITUTION OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION, ESTABLISH JUSTICE,

    INSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE,

     PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE,

    AND SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY, DO ORDAIN AND ESTABLISH THIS CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    to be continued…..


  • The Human Toll In Gun Free Zones

    THE LARGEST MASS SHOOTING IN AMERICAN HISTORY?

    Orlando’s ‘Pulse’ Gay Bar Was a ‘Gun-Free Zone’ by State Law – Breitbart

    www.breitbart.com/…/orlando-pulse-gay-bar-gunfreezone-s…

    Breitbart News Network

    8 hours ago – Pulse, the Orlando gay nightclub targeted in A JIHADIST TERROR ATTACK, WAS A “GUN-FREE ZONE” BY STATE LAW. Per Florida’s concealed carry law, those with a license to carry may not carry their firearms into an establishment that serves alcohol.

    50 Dead, 53 Wounded In Orlando Nightclub Terrorist Attack …

    www.zerohedge.com/…/20-dead-scores-wounded-orlando-nightclub-dom…

    Zero Hedge

    5 hours ago – #Orlando shooting “appears to be connected to Islamic radicalism” – Florida …. So if it was a gun free zoneHOW DID THIS POSSIBLY HAPPEN?

    ——————————————————————————-

    The bottom line

    WATCH OUT ISIS WHEN DONALD J. TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, HE  HAS PROMISED  THAT ARMED CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE SHOOTING BACK.

    TRUMP ANNOUNCED TO THE NRA “WE’RE GETTING RID OF GUN FREE ZONES, OK? I CAN TELL YOU. WE’RE GETTING RID OF THEM,”

    INDEED TRUMP ON HAS MADE MANY STATEMENTS ON THE HUMAN TOLL IN GUN FREE ZONES.

    Donald Trump TN Speech – Paris, Guns And Second Amendment – If …

    ———————————————————-

    YET, ANOTHER JIHADIST TERROR ATTACK IN A DEFENSELESS GUN FREE KILLING FIELD

    Pulse club Orlando Florida. “’We consider this an act of terrorism‘: Suspected Islamic extremist … Officers described it as a ‘mass shooting‘. …. last night in Orlando they were celebrating Hispanic Gay Pride.

    The Human Toll In ANOTHER Gun Free Zones

    ——————————————————————-

    ANOTHER JIHADIST TERROR ATTACK

    THE BIGGEST MASS SHOOTING IN AMERICAN HISTORY?

    ISIS CLAIMED THEY WERE GOING TO ATTACK FLORIDA THREE DAYS BEFORE a fanatic armed with an AR-15 assault shot dead at least 50 people in a gay nightclub, according to Twitter feeds supporting the terror group.

    —————————————————

    HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN IN FLORIDA?

    AFTER BEING GIVEN A THREE DAY WARNING?

    ‘He’s a known quantity. He’s been on the radar before’: Worst mass shooter in US history Omar Mateen had been investigated TWICE by the FBI…

    Mateen killed at least 50 people and injured 53 more at the Pulse gay club in Orlando on Sunday. The FBI named Mateen a person of interest…

    ——————————————————————————-

    Published: 11:07 EST, 12 June 2016 | Updated: 13:26 EST, 12 June 2016

     ISIS WALLOWS IN LATEST SICK ATTACK ON AMERICA: TERROR GROUP PRAISES GAY NIGHTCLUB BLOODBATH JUST THREE DAYS AFTER ISSUING A WARNING THAT FLORIDA WOULD BECOME A TARGET

    SECURITY SERVICES IN FLORIDA HAVE CONFIRMED THE KILLER IS 29-YEAR-OLD OMAR MATEEN, A US-BORN CITIZEN WITH AFGHAN PARENTS, AND ISIS-AFFILIATED TWITTER ACCOUNTS.

    By Darren Boyle for MailOnline

    Published: 11:07 EST, 12 June 2016 | Updated: 13:26 EST, 12 June 2016

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3637780/ISIS-wallows-latest-sick-attack-America-Terror-group-praises-gay-nightclub-bloodbath-just-three-days-issuing-warning-Florida-target.html#ixzz4BOaTcDna
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    ————————————————————————————-

    THREE DAYS AFTER ISSUING A WARNING THAT FLORIDA WOULD BECOME A TARGET

    (CNN)THE GUNMAN WHO KILLED 50 PEOPLE AT AN ORLANDO NIGHTCLUB PLEDGED ALLEGIANCE TO ISIS AND MENTIONED THE BOSTON BOMBING IN A 911 CALL, ACCORDING TO A U.S. OFFICIAL.

    SUSPECT OMAR MATEEN MADE THE CALL MORE THAN 20 MINUTES INTO THE ATTACK, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL SAID.

    —————————————————————————

    ANOTHER JIHADIST TERROR ATTACK  IN A DEFENSELESS GUN FREE KILLING FIELD?

     IN A GOVERNMENT-MANDATED GUN FREE ZONES, SUCH AS THE FORT HOOD MILITARY BASE WHERE MASS SHOOTINGS OCCURRED IN 2009 AND 2014, OR THE FACILITY ATTACKED IN SAN BERNARDINO WHERE 14 PEOPLE WERE KILLED.

    ——————————————————————–

    WATCH OUT ISIS: 

    TRUMP ANNOUNCED TO THE NRA “WE’RE GETTING RID OF GUN FREE ZONES, OK?

    I CAN TELL YOU. WE’RE GETTING RID OF THEM,”

    donald trump full speech at national rifle association (nra) – YouTube

    ▶ 32:35

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGnf0x6FJY8

    May 20, 2016 – Uploaded by Donald J Trump for President

    DONALD TRUMP FULL SPEECH AT NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION (NRA) CONFERENCE (5/20/2016)

     TRUMP SAID,  REFERRING TO THE SAN BERNARDO MASSACRE,

    “IF WE HAD GUNS ON THE OTHER SIDE, IT WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN THAT WAY.

     WATCH OUT ISIS:   TRUMP SAID,   I WOULD HAVE –” AND THEN MADE A QUICK-DRAW GESTURE FROM HIS POCKET WITH HIS HAND IN THE FORM OF A GUN AND SAID, “BOOM.”

    WATCH OUT ISIS: HAD DONALD J. TRUMP BEEN AROUND WHEN ISIS ATTACKED PARIS, HE WOULD HAVE ‘OPENED FIRE’

     ———————————————

     ‘DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT IF THERE WERE PEOPLE IN THE CROWD, WHO WERE ARMED AND TRAINED, THINGS WOULD HAVE TURNED OUT THE SAME WAY?’

     Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump addresses members of the National Rifle Association’s during their NRA-ILA Leadership Forum during at their annual meeting in Louisville, Kentucky, May 20, 2016. © John Sommers II / Reuters

    TRUMP ANNOUNCED TO THE NRA “WE’RE GETTING RID OF GUN FREE ZONES, OK?

    I CAN TELL YOU. WE’RE GETTING RID OF THEM,”

     —————————————————

    Try making sense of this timeline

     THREE DAYS AFTER  ISSUING A WARNING THAT FLORIDA WOULD BECOME AN ISIS TARGET

    ‘He’s a known quantity. He’s been on the radar before’: Worst mass shooter in US history Omar Mateen had been investigated TWICE by the FBI…

    The FBI says agents twice investigated the man who killed 50 people inside a gay nightclub, but closed those cases after interviewing him.

    FBI agent Ronald Hopper said Sunday that Omar Mateen had been interviewed in 2013 and 2014. Hopper said agents first investigated Mateen after he made inflammatory comments to co-workers alleging possible ties to terrorists.

    Mateen was interviewed twice and, when investigators were unable to verify the details of his comments, the FBI closed the probe.

    In 2014, the agency looked into potential ties connecting Mateen to Moner Mohammad Abusalha, the first American to carry out a suicide attack in Syria. Like Mateen, Abusalha lived in Fort Pierce, Florida.

    Hopper says agents determined that contact was minimal and did not constitute a substantive relationship or a threat at that time.

    ——————————————————————

    Try making sense of this FBI timeline

    (CNN)THE GUNMAN WHO KILLED 50 PEOPLE AT AN ORLANDO NIGHTCLUB PLEDGED ALLEGIANCE TO ISIS AND MENTIONED THE BOSTON BOMBING IN A 911 CALL, ACCORDING TO A U.S. OFFICIAL.

    SUSPECT OMAR MATEEN MADE THE CALL MORE THAN 20 MINUTES INTO THE ATTACK, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL SAID.

    OMAR MATEEN MENTIONED THE BOSTON BOMBING?

    ———————————————————————-

     [PDF]boston marathon bombings – Office of the Inspector General

    https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf

    Apr 10, 2014 – TWO YEARS BEFORE THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGS, TAMERLAN TSARNAEV AND ZUBEIDAT … THE FBI-LED JOINT TERRORISM TASK FORCE IN BOSTON (BOSTON JTTF) … BY APRIL 19, 2013, AFTER THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS WERE IDENTIFIED AS SUSPECTS IN … account the limited facts known to U.S. government agencies prior to the …

    Two years before the Boston Marathon bombings, Tamerlan Tsarnaev

    and Zubeidat Tsarnaeva came to the attention of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) based on information received from the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). In March 2011, the FBI received information from the FSB alleging that Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Zubeidat Tsarnaeva were adherents of radical Islam and that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was preparing to travel to Russia to join unspecified underground groups in Dagestan and Chechnya.

    The FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force in Boston (Boston JTTF) conducted an assessment of Tamerlan Tsarnaev to determine whether he posed a threat to national security and closed the assessment three months  later having found no link or “nexus” to terrorism

    —————————————————————-

    Try making sense of this BOSTON BOMBING  GUN FREE timeline

    FAMILIES RUNNING HOME UNARMED AFTER THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBINGS

    WITH DANGEROUS ARMED TERRORISTS ON THE LOOSE SOMEWHERE IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS

    DURING FRIDAY’S MANHUNT THERE WERE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF LAW ABIDING CITIZENS LIVING IN FEAR INSIDE THEIR HOMES, ON LOCK DOWN.

    HOW MANY OF THE UNARMED, LAW ABIDING CITIZENS LOCKED DOWN IN THEIR HOMES WITH A DANGEROUS TERRORIST ON THE LOOSE IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS WERE COMPLETELY DISARMED AND UNABLE TO DEFEND THEIR LOVED ONES? 

    HOW MANY OF THEM WERE WISHING THEY WERE ARMED WITH A GUN?

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/23/boston-an-armed-terrorist-in-a-gun-free-neighborhood/#ixzz4BOlYz7bm

    ————————————————-

    May 20, 2016.

    TRUMP ANNOUNCED TO THE NRA “WE’RE GETTING RID OF GUN FREE ZONES, OK?

    I CAN TELL YOU. WE’RE GETTING RID OF THEM,”

    ——————————————————————————————-

     Orlando Nightclub Shooting: Timeline of events | WPEC

    cbs12.com/news/local/orlando-nightclub-shootingtimeline-of-events

    WPEC

    5 hours ago – Orlando Police responding to a shooting at a nightclub in Florida. … the shooting as a “mass casualty situation” and said local, state and federal …

    ORLANDO, Fl. (CBS12) — 2:02 a.m.

    Orlando Police Officer working security at Pulse Nightclub responded to shots fired.

    Officer engaged in gun battle with the suspect, when the suspect went back into the club and more shots were fired.

    Pulse Orlando Nightclub posted on its own Facebook page.: “Everyone get out of pulse and keep running.”

    ———————————————————————-

    5:15 a.m.

    Police say a loud noise near the scene of a reported shooting at a nightclub in Florida was a “controlled explosion.” At 2:05AM ……..

    ———————————————————————

    2:05 AM – 12 Jun 2016

    Orlando Police Verified account @OrlandoPolice

    That sound was a controlled explosion by law enforcement. Please avoid reporting inaccuracies at this time.

    2:05 AM – 12 Jun 2016

    —————————————————————

    AROUND 5 A.M., AUTHORITIES SENT IN A SWAT TEAM TO RESCUE THE HOSTAGES

    ——————————————————————.

    4:50 a.m.

    Orlando Police responding to a shooting at a nightclub in Florida.

    A post on the department’s official Twitter account early Sunday morning says “multiple injuries” have been reported following the incident at the Pulse Orlando nightclub near Orange and Kaley avenue. The department also advises people to stay away from area.

    Orlando Police said on the department’s official Twitter account Sunday that media should avoid “reporting inaccuracies.” No further details were immediately provided about the explosion.

    Police have said “multiple injuries” were reported following the incident at the Pulse Orlando nightclub near Orange and Kaley avenue. The department also advised people to stay away from area.

    ———————————————————–

    5:55 a.m.

    Police say the person who opened fire inside a popular Florida nightclub is dead.

    Orlando Police did not immediately provide further details on the department’s official Twitter account on Sunday. It was not immediately clear how the shooter died.

    Police described the shooting as a “mass casualty situation” and said local, state and federal agencies were involved in the investigation.

    ———————————————————————

    2:48 AM – 12 Jun 2016

    Orlando Police Verified account @OrlandoPolice

    We can confirm this is a mass casualty situation. Support from local/state/federal agencies. We expect to brief media shortly.

    2:48 AM – 12 Jun 2016

    It was not immediately clear how many people were wounded in the shooting, or if any of the victims had died. Police have told people to stay away from the area and said a noise in the vicinity was a “controlled explosion.” No further details were provided on the explosion.

    Dozens of emergency vehicles have swarmed the area around the club. 5:55 a.m.

    ————————————————————————

    PULSE POSTED ON ITS OWN FACEBOOK PAGE AROUND 2 A.M.: “EVERYONE GET OUT OF PULSE AND KEEP RUNNING.”

    JUST BEFORE 6 A.M., THE CLUB POSTED AN UPDATE: “AS SOON AS WE HAVE ANY INFORMATION, WE WILL UPDATE EVERYONE. Please keep everyone in your prayers as we work through this tragic event. Thank you for your thoughts and love.”

    —————————————————————————————-

    HOW DID THIS  HAPPEN? ANOTHER GUN FREE ZONE MASSACRE

    PICTURED: Worst mass shooter in U.S. history – NYC-born ‘Islamic extremist’ Omar Mateen, 29, who shot dead 50 and injured 53 in Orlando gay…

    The nightclub told revellers to ‘keep on running’ as the man took hostages at Pulse Club in Orlando at around 3.25 local time (8.25am GMT)….

    ————————————————————————-

    WATCH OUT ISIS WHEN DONALD J. TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, HE  HAS PROMISED ARMED CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE SHOOTING BACK.

    INDEED TRUMP ON HAS MADE MANY STATEMENTS ON THE HUMAN TOLL IN GUN FREE ZONES.

    Donald Trump TN Speech – Paris, Guns And Second Amendment – If …

    rickwells.us/donald-trump-tn-speech-parisguns-and-second-amendment-if-only-a-fe…

    As it was, the gunfree zone was a DEFENSELESS KILLING FIELD. … Donald Trump has a few comments to make on the attacks in Paris and how the disarmed …

    ——————————————————————–

    TRUMP HAS MADE A FEW COMMENTS MY FOOT…

    TRUMP HAS MADE MANY COMMENTS…

    WATCH OUT ISIS: HAD DONALD J TRUMP BEEN AROUND WHEN ISIS ATTACKED PARIS AND SLAUGHTERED 130 UNARMED PEOPLE,

    HE WOULD HAVE ‘OPENED FIRE’

    ——————————————————————————-

    TRUMP MANY COMMENTS ON THE HUMAN TOLL IN GUN FREE ZONES.

    After the CHARLIE HEBDO MASSACRE in January of 2015, Trump tweeted, ‘If the people so violently shot down in Paris had guns, at least they would have had a fighting chance.’

    ————————————–

    In an interview this month that ran in Valleurs Actuelles, Trump referenced the November TERRORIST ATTACK ON PARIS and said, ‘Do you really think that if there were people in the crowd, who were armed and trained, things would have turned out the same way?’

    ‘Isn’t it interesting that the tragedy in Paris too place in one of the toughest gun control countries in the world?’

    ————————————————

    ‘REMEMBER, WHEN GUNS ARE OUTLAWED, ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE GUNS!” HE SAID IN A THIRD TWEET. 

    Trump on The Human Toll In Gun Free Zones

    Speaking about the  Aurora, Colorado, movie theater shooting, Trump told her, ‘If some of the people in the movie theater had a gun, they’d have been shooting at him. NOBODY HAD A GUN SO THEY WERE TOTALLY DEFENSELESS.’
    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3444222/I-gun-Trump-tells-French-magazine-ISIS-attacked-Paris-opened-fire.html#ixzz4BO5THEPv
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    —————————————–

    ‘He’s a known quantity. He’s been on the radar before’: Worst mass shooter in US history Omar Mateen had been investigated TWICE by the FBI…

    Mateen killed at least 50 people and injured 53 more at the Pulse gay club in Orlando on Sunday. The FBI named Mateen a person of interest…
    PICTURED: Worst mass shooter in U.S. history – NYC-born ‘Islamic extremist’ Omar Mateen, 29, who shot dead 50 and injured 53 in Orlando gay…

    The nightclub told revellers to ‘keep on running’ as the man took hostages at Pulse Club in Orlando at around 3.25 local time (8.25am GMT)….

    ————————————————————————

    WATCH OUT ISIS WHEN DONALD J. TRUMP IS PRESIDENT ARMED CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE SHOOTING BACK.

    After the Charlie Hebdo massacre in January of 2015, Trump tweeted, ‘If the people so violently shot down in Paris had guns, at least they would have had a fighting chance.’

    ‘Isn’t it interesting that the tragedy in Paris too place in one of the toughest gun control countries in the world?’

    ‘Remember, when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!” he said in a third tweet. 

    In an interview this month that ran in Valleurs Actuelles, Trump referenced the November terrorist attack on Paris and said, ‘Do you really think that if there were people in the crowd, who were armed and trained, things would have turned out the same way?’

    ‘I don’t think so. They would have killed the terrorists. It makes sense,’ he said.

    The GOP front-runner for president then declared: ‘I always have a gun on me. I can tell you that if I had been in the Bataclan or in the cafes I would have opened fire.’

    Speaking about the  Aurora, Colorado, movie theater shooting, Trump told her, ‘If some of the people in the movie theater had a gun, they’d have been shooting at him. Nobody had a gun so they were totally defenseless.’

    ‘I always have a gun on me’ Trump tells French magazine – and had he been around when ISIS attacked Paris ‘I would have opened fire’

    • Trump was making the case for loosened regulations on firearms; France has strict gun laws and no right to bear arms
    • He referenced terrorist attack on Paris and said, ‘DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT IF THERE WERE PEOPLE IN THE CROWD, WHO WERE ARMED AND TRAINED, THINGS WOULD HAVE TURNED OUT THE SAME WAY?’
    • Had Donald J Trump been around when ISIS attacked Paris, he says he would have ‘opened fire.’
    • ‘I always have a gun on me,’ he reportedly told French magazine Valleurs Actuelles as he made the case for loosened regulations on firearms.
    • France has strict gun laws and no right to bear arms for its citizens. THE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS MORE THAN ONCE SUGGESTED THE LAWS THERE BE CHANGED THERE AND ELSEWHERE SO THAT VICTIMS OF SUCH ATTACKS ARE ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.
    • Scroll down for video

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3444222/I-gun-Trump-tells-French-magazine-ISIS-attacked-Paris-opened-fire.html#ixzz4BO1bAfDl
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    ————————————————————————————

    Why Investigations of “Intelligence Failures” Go Nowhere …

    whowhatwhy.org/2015/…/watchdogs-push-back-against-executive-agency-stonewalli…

    Dec 21, 2015 – Boston Marathon explosions Photo credit: Aaron “tango” Tang … refusing to provide the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) with documents deemed … The IG investigation into the Marathon bombing intelligence failures was …

    CASE IN POINT: THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE “INTELLIGENCE FAILURES” BEFORE THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING STANDS AS A REMINDER OF WHAT TOOTHLESS OVERSIGHT LOOKS LIKE. STYMIED BY THE AGENCIES INVOLVED,

    THE MARATHON BOMBING INVESTIGATION FOUND EXACTLY

     NO ONE ACCOUNTABLE FOR FAILING TO HEAD OFF THE TRAGIC EVENT .

    ——————————————————-

    AS USUAL, OBAMA USED MADE HIS LIBERAL TOO LITTLE TOO LATE SPEECH, ON TERRORISM, AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER CONDOLENCES…..

    —————————————–

    The bottom line

    WATCH OUT ISIS WHEN DONALD J. TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, HE  HAS PROMISED  THAT ARMED CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE SHOOTING BACK.

    TRUMP ANNOUNCED TO THE NRA “WE’RE GETTING RID OF GUN FREE ZONES, OK? I CAN TELL YOU. WE’RE GETTING RID OF THEM,”


  • Gun Control Circumvents Due Process of Law

    The latest result caused by the U.S. Government’s increased pressure on  a private business,  to circumvent  and deny American citizens their constitutional right to due process on gun control laws.

    Circumvent  by definition, overcome (a problem or difficulty), typically in a clever and surreptitious way, deceive, outwit and. find a way around (an obstacle).

    JAN 30, 2016 Facebook bans private gun sales

    New Mark Zuckerberg’s New Facebook policy bans talk of private gun sales, applies to Instagram.

    MARK ZUCKERBERG, FACEBOOK’S CHIEF EXECUTIVE,  IN RESPONSE TO President Obama and state attorneys general increased pressure on Facebook to tighten restrictions on firearms because of the proliferation of posts that offer guns for sale, often without background checks

    JAN 29, 2016 Facebook Moves to Ban Private Gun Sales on Its Site and Instagram

    New York Times‎ – 17 hours ago

    Facebook is banning private sales of guns on its flagship social network and its Instagram …

    WHAT IS MARK ZUCKERBERG ANTI-GUN “GLOBAL” FACEBOOK  NEW MANAGEMENT POLICY?

    HOW BIG IS IT? WHAT IS IT? WHAT IS IT LEADING UP TO?

    WHAT IS, MARK’S PRIVATE WEBSITES GLOBAL POLICY AGENDA? 

    HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED? WHY NOW?

    HOW DOES FACEBOOK’S NEW POLICY WORK?

    HOW DOES IT EFFECT AMERICAN CITIZENS SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW? HOW INVASIVE? HOW THREATENING?

    ———————————————————–

    Monika Bickert, head of FACEBOOK’S GLOBAL POLICY MANAGEMENT, said in a statement on Friday evening.“Over the last two years, more and more people have been using Facebook to discover products and to buy and sell things to one another. We are continuing to develop, test, and launch new products to make this experience even better for people and are updating our regulated goods policies to reflect this evolution,”

    ——————————————————————————-

    HOW BIG IS IT? HOW BIG IS GLOBAL?

    —————————————————————

    WHAT IS IT?

    WHAT IS, MARK’S PRIVATE WEBSITES GLOBAL POLICY AGENDA? 

    WHAT IS IT LEADING UP TO? THE LONG RANGE PLAN?

    Complete Disarmament Public Law 87-297

    This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. (The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms.)  (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)

    BEFORE STAGE I CLOSES, ALL CITIZEN OWNED GUNS ARE TO BE BANNED.

    ——————————————————————–

    HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED?

    Facebook users must register before using the social network

    HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE ACTIVE ON FACE BOOK?

    More than one BILLION people are active on FACEBOOK

    JAN 30, 2016 1.6 BILLION PEOPLE  ARE ACTIVE ON FACEBOOK

    HOW MANY PEOPLE USE INSTAGRAM?

    Instagram Hits 300 Million Monthly Users

    Just nine months after hitting 200 million users, Instagram now says 300 million people use its photo app every month, with 70% of them coming from outside the US. That makes Instagram officially bigger than Twitter, which had 284 million active users as of six weeks ago.Dec 10, 2014
    WHY NOW?
    Jan 5, 2016 Emotional Obama calls for ‘SENSE OF EMERGENCY” to fight gun violence

    Obama executive action: New gun control orders …

    www.cnn.com/2016/01/05/…/obama-executive-action-guncontrol/
    CNN

    Jan 5, 2016 – Emotional Obama calls for ‘sense of urgency’ to fight gun violence ….. control advocate Gabby Giffords, who was seriously injured in a 2011 mass shooting, … that we can take to help reduce gun violence and save more lives.

    Residents of Oregon Shooting Town Tell Obama: ‘Go Home’

    www.newsmax.com/…shootingobama/2015/…/69555…
    Newsmax Media

    Oct 9, 2015 – Gun-rights activists gathered in Oregon on Friday to protest … at Obama’s plans to use the visit to call for stronger restrictions on firearms.

    ———————————————————————-
    HOW DOES FACEBOOK’S NEW POLICY WORK? HOW DOES IT EFFECT AMERICAN CITIZENS SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW? HOW INVASIVE? HOW THREATENING?
    Although Facebook was not directly involved in gun sales…
    MARK ZUCKERBERG’S Facebook new gun policy?
    My question to my federal and state representatives.
    DO YOU SUPPORT THE LAW OF THE LAND AND  DUE PROCESS OF LAW?
    ————————————————-

    Facebook said it would rely on its vast network of users to report any violations of the new rules,

    —————————————————————–

    My question to my federal and state representatives.

    SO WHEN ANY GLOBAL FACEBOOK USER  REPORTS YOU AS A VIOLATOR OF THE NEW RULES?

    THEN? A FACEBOOK STAFF MEMBER  READS YOUR POSTS AND, JUDGES YOU AND DECIDES IF YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE NEW RULE?

    ———————————————————————-

    and would remove any post that violated the policy.

    —————————————————————

    My question to my federal and state representatives.

    WHEN? AFTER? YOU HAVE BEEN JUDGED AND FOUND GUILTY OF VIOLATING THE NEW RULE BY A FACEBOOK STAFF MEMBER?

    ————————————————————————–

    Beyond that, the company said it could ban users or severely limit the ways they post on Facebook,

    ——————————————————–

    My question to my federal and state representatives.

    WHEN? AFTER? A FACEBOOK STAFF MEMBER, READS YOUR ENTIRE? FACEBOOK  HISTORY? AND THEY  JUDGE YOU AGAIN ON YOUR PAST VIOLATION?

    ——————————————————————-

    depending on the type and severity of past violations.

    ———————————————————————–

    My question to my federal and state representatives.

    WHEN? AFTER? YOU HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A VIOLATOR BY ANYONE OF THE 1.6 BILLION PEOPLE ACTIVE ON FACEBOOK AND  BEEN JUDGED AND FOUND GUILTY OF ALL OF THE ABOVE  BY A FACEBOOK STAFF MEMBER?

    THEN? IF FACEBOOK COMPANY BELIEVES?

    ————————————————————–

    If the company believed someone’s life was in danger,

    Facebook would work with law enforcement on the situation.

    —————————————————————

    My question to my federal and state representatives.

    WOULD YOU AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING?

    IN ORDER TO WORK WITH, GET LAW ENFORCEMENT INVOLVED, AN OFFICIAL REPORT BY THE SOMEBODY AT THE FACEBOOK COMPANY. WOULD BE FILED AGAINST YOU, AS A VIOLATOR,  GUN DANGER TO SOCIETY OR TO YOURSELF.

    ———————————————————————

     THE LAW OF THE LAND AND  DUE PROCESS OF LAW

    The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”

    The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution each contain a due process clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law.

    —————————————————————–

    Behind My Back | Olympia WA Has Gone Anti-Gun Crazy

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/01/…/olympiawahasgoneantiguncraz

    Jan 18, 2016 – It’s the first week of the new 2016 legislative session in Olympia WA and the antigun politicians have wasted no time in sending out a series of …

    WA STATE HB 1857 Concerning extreme risk protective orders.This doozy allows any family member or law enforcement with a grudge

    IF THIS PROPOSED 1857 BILL IS PASSED, IT SHALL ALLOW ANYONE TO SAY YOU ARE A DANGER

    or made a threat (verbal) in the last six months and you lose your gun rights. No proof needed and no other action because if you were a threat, shouldn’t something more be done?

    —————————————————————–

    Facebook will also rely on user reports of private gun sales that occur between members via Facebook Messenger, the company’s private messaging service.

    Facebook does not scan the content of those messages.

    ————————————————————————————–

    My bottom line question

    My question to my ELECTED federal and state representatives.
    DO YOU ABIDE BY  THE LAW OF THE LAND AND CONSTITUTIONAL  DUE PROCESS OF LAW ON GUN CONTROL IN YOUR LEGISLATION?

    ———————————————————————

    Facebook Moves to Ban Private Gun Sales on Its Site and Instagram

    JAN 29, 2016 New York Times‎ – 17 hours ago

    full text

    Facebook is banning private sales of guns on its flagship social network and its Instagram photo-sharing service, a move meant to clamp down on unlicensed gun transactions.

    Facebook already prohibits people from offering marijuana, pharmaceuticals and illegal drugs for sale, and the company said on Friday that it was updating its policy to include guns. The ban applies to private, person-to-person sales of guns. Licensed gun dealers and gun clubs can still maintain Facebook pages and post on Instagram.

    Although Facebook was not directly involved in gun sales, it has served as a forum for gun sales to be negotiated, without people having to undergo background checks. The social network, with 1.6 billion monthly visitors, had become one of the world’s largest marketplaces for guns and was increasingly evolving into an e-commerce site where it could facilitate transactions of goods.

    Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive. In response to President Obama’s recent call to curb unlicensed gun sales, some sellers said they would turn to sites like Facebook. Credit Josh Edelson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

    Facebook said it would rely on its vast network of users to report any violations of the new rules, and would remove any post that violated the policy. Beyond that, the company said it could ban users or severely limit the ways they post on Facebook, depending on the type and severity of past violations. If the company believed someone’s life was in danger, Facebook would work with law enforcement on the situation.

    Facebook will also rely on user reports of private gun sales that occur between members via Facebook Messenger, the company’s private messaging service. Facebook does not scan the content of those messages.

    “Over the last two years, more and more people have been using Facebook to discover products and to buy and sell things to one another,” Monika Bickert, Facebook’s head of product policy, said in a statement. “We are continuing to develop, test and launch new products to make this experience even better for people and are updating our regulated goods policies to reflect this evolution.”

    New York’s attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, who has pressed for restrictions on illegal gun sales on Facebook and other sites, praised the company’s move.

    “Today’s announcement is another positive step toward our shared goal of stopping illegal online gun sales once and for all,” he said in a statement on Friday.

    Facebook plays host to scores of online groups that cater to gun enthusiasts, with members posting pictures and details about an individual gun, or a gun they might be looking to buy. Many of the groups are private, meaning that Facebook users may need to be approved by an administrator before they can see or write posts.

    Unlike professional gun sellers, hobbyists who sell or trade a few guns a year are not typically required to be licensed by the federal government. Some, like Scott Schmoke of Florida, say that Facebook helps them sell just a handful of weapons a year. Mr. Schmoke said in an interview this month that he always insisted on meeting potential buyers face-to-face, to feel them out.

    “I go to a secure location, and I say, ‘Can I see your driver’s license? Do you have a concealed-weapons permit?’ ” Mr. Schmoke said. If he gets a bad feeling, he does not sell, he said.

    But as an unlicensed seller, Mr. Schmoke is under no obligation to perform any kind of background check. Federal authorities have expressed worries that the Internet has fueled the sale of guns to felons and others who might normally be blocked from buying firearms.

    Facebook has taken some steps to regulate gun sales over the years. In 2014, it said it would limit gun sales on its site and on Instagram, including by shielding minors from Facebook pages that advertised guns for sale.

    But since then, Facebook has been inching toward facilitating e-commerce transactions. In December, the company introduced a project that directs users to local businesses and services that are well-reviewed on Facebook. Facebook can also store users’ credit card information. And in recent months, Facebook made it possible to send peer-to-peer payments through Messenger.

    Facebook’s progression toward on-site payments underscored the need to update the company’s content policy, a Facebook spokeswoman said.

    The company has also been pushed by gun safety groups including Everytown for Gun Safety, an umbrella group that united the efforts of two separate organizations of mayors and mothers to promote gun safety. Shannon Watts, the founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, one of those two advocacy groups, said she met with senior Facebook officials repeatedly over the last two years.

    Everytown for Gun Safety presented Facebook with research connecting unlicensed gun sales on the site to gun violence. For example, Ms. Watts said, in December 2014, an Ohio man, Brian Harleman, shot and wounded his ex-girlfriend and killed her 10-year-old daughter before killing himself. Although prohibited from buying firearms because of a felony conviction, he was able to buy the weapon in an unlicensed sale on Facebook.

    “We were saying, ‘Please stop the unfettered access to guns on Facebook,’ ” Ms. Watts, a mother of five in Colorado, said in an interview.

    Because of Facebook’s tremendous influence, she said, its decision to ban person-to-person sales of guns will have ripple effects on gun policy nationwide.

    “What they’re doing is sending such an incredibly strong, sentinel signal to the world that America is working in the right direction on guns,” she said. “For them to take a stand and do the right thing gives cover to other businesses to do the right thing.”

    Rachel Abrams contributed reporting.

    A version of this article appears in print on January 30, 2016, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Joining the Gun Debate, Facebook Bans Private Firearm Sales . Order Reprints| Today’s Paper|Subscribe

    —————————————————————–

    JAN 30, 2016 Facebook bans private gun sales

    www.usatoday.com/…/facebook…on-gun-sales/79543652/

    MARK ZUCKERBERG, FACEBOOK’S CHIEF EXECUTIVE. IN RESPONSE TO President Obama and state attorneys general increased pressure on Facebook to tighten restrictions on firearms because of the proliferation of posts that offer guns for sale, often without background checks

    MARK ZUCKERBERG COMPANY…

    Facebook bans private gun sales – USA Today
    Facebook IS MARK ZUCKERBERG PRIVATE WEBSITE, IS BANNING PRIVATE SALES OF GUNS ON ITS FLAGSHIP SOCIAL NETWORK AND ITS Instagram PHOTO-SHARING SERVICE, A MOVE MEANT TO CLAMP DOWN ON UNLICENSED GUN TRANSACTIONS.

    —————————————————————-

    JAN 29 4:00 PM EST FACEBOOK INC. MARK ZUCKERBERG’S NET WORTH CLIMBED TO $47.6 BILLION AS OF 4PM ET, WHEN FACEBOOK STOCK CLOSED AT $109.11 A SHARE

    MARK ZUCKERBERG as the sixth richest man in the world he,  did not fight back to protect American gun rights with his personal worth at $47.6 BILLION.

    ——————————————————————————

    BACKED BY BILLIONAIRE’S?

    President Barack Obama and state attorneys general, as well as gun control activist groups Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and Mayors Against Illegal Guns – backed by billionaire and former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberghad been urging the world’s top social media website to crack down on private gun sales, USA Today reported.

    BACKED BY A BILLIONAIRE? UNDER GOVERNMENT PRESSURE? MARK ZUCKERBERG SOLD US OUT

    JAN 30, 2016 MARK ZUCKERBERG ‘S Facebook bans private gun sales

    ——————————————————————————-

    Facebook plays host to scores of online groups that cater to gun enthusiasts, with members posting pictures and details about an individual gun, or a gun they might be looking to buy. Many of the groups are private…..

    WHAT CAN YOU DO AS AN AMERICAN gun enthusiast?

    PEOPLE PRESSURE FIRST…

    UNFRIEND MARK ZUCKERMAN ON YOUR FACEBOOK PAGE .

    How do I unfriend or remove a friend? | Facebook Help Center

    https://www.facebook.com/help/172936839431357
    Facebook
    Note: If you choose to unfriend someone, you’ll be removed from that person’s friends list as well. … How do I suggest a friend to someone? … How do I remove or cancel a friend request I sent to someone?

    ——————————————————————–

    As a gun enthusiast SUGGEST A FRIEND TO THE NATIONAL RIFLEMEN ASSOCIATION (NRA)

    ————————————————————————————-

    If I unfriend someone, will they be notified? | Facebook Help

    https://www.facebook.com/help/110698549016637
    Facebook
    No, but you’ll be removed as a friend from their friend list as well.

    —————————————————————————————-

    As a gun enthusiast WANT TO NOTIFY MARK ZUCKERBERG ABOUT HIS NEW POLICY ON HIS PRIVATE WEBSITE?

    SELL ALL OF YOUR FACEBOOK STOCK.

    ——————————————

    My bottom line question

    My question to my ELECTED federal and state representatives.
    DO YOU ABIDE BY  THE LAW OF THE LAND AND CONSTITUTIONAL  DUE PROCESS OF LAW ON GUN CONTROL IN YOUR LEGISLATION?

  • The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE …
    THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

    ————————————
    THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD,
    Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;

    —————–
    Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;

    —————————-
    Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted of man’s material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
    Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:

    —————————————————————–
    (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required of preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    (b) the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
    (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    Call on the negotiating states:
    (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
    (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
    (c) Also to seek – without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program – agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
    Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
    (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safe-guarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
    (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
    (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
    (d) As stated relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation an common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
    (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
    Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
    STAGE I
    A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
    (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
    (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
    (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
    (d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.
    C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
    (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
    (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
    (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
    (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
    (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfer to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
    (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
    E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
    (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
    (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle. F. To reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
    (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
    (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations of the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.
    G. To Keep the Peace:
    (a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force – including nuclear, conventional, or CBR – contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
    (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
    (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
    (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be despatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STAGE II
    A. International Disarmament Organization:
    The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.
    B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
    (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
    (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.
    D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
    E. To Keep the Peace:
    During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the united Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the united Nations:
    (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the united Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
    (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.
    STAGE III
    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force (emphasis added) and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
    The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
    (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
    (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    The end of Publication 7277


  • Complete Disarmament Public Law 87-297

    Complete Disarmament Public Law 87-297

    Do you want to know why public officials are voting to take away your firearms?

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the …
    INDEED, THE UNITED STATES INTRODUCED IT
    AT THE SIXTEENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS
    A PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD.

    This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. (The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms.)  (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)

    —————————————————–
    DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    PUBLICATION 7277
    Disarmament Series 5
    Released September 1961
    ———————————————————–
    Title 22 USC 2552
    HERE YOU WILL FIND IT STATED AS ITEM (A) “CONTROL, REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES…” AND AS ITEM (D)” …ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES….”

    ——————–
    WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IS THAT YOUR ARMED FORCES ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND RELINQUISHED FROM NATIONAL CONTROL

    ————————
    WHICH, IN TURN, WIPES OUT OUR SOVEREIGNTY AS A NATION.

    ————————
    IN TWO STAGES, WE WILL HAVE NO MORE ARMY, NO MORE NAVY, NO MORE AIR FORCE.

    ———————————
    IN THE THIRD STAGE, WE SHALL HAVE A “ZERO” MILITARY.

    ————————————
    BEFORE STAGE I CLOSES, ALL CITIZEN OWNED GUNS ARE TO BE BANNED.
    —————————————————————————–
    FREEDOM FROM WAR:

    ‘UNITED STATES CODE BOOKS’ OPEN VOLUME 9.
    TURN TO PAGE 651. HERE YOU WILL FIND PUBLIC LAW 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)
    TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by “disarmament.” THE DISARMAMENT CALLS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF OUR ARMED FORCES. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds.
    (This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a).
    TURN TO PAGE 654.
    HERE YOU WILL FIND IT STATED AS ITEM (A) “CONTROL, REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES…” AND AS ITEM (D)” …ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES….” WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IS THAT YOUR ARMED FORCES ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND RELINQUISHED FROM NATIONAL CONTROL WHICH, IN TURN, WIPES OUT OUR SOVEREIGNTY AS A NATION. IN TWO STAGES, WE WILL HAVE NO MORE ARMY, NO MORE NAVY, NO MORE AIR FORCE. IN THE THIRD STAGE,
    WE SHALL HAVE A “ZERO” MILITARY.
    BEFORE STAGE I CLOSES, ALL CITIZEN OWNED GUNS ARE TO BE BANNED.
    —————————————————————————————
    The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World
    DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    PUBLICATION 7277
    Disarmament Series 5
    Released September 1961
    Office of Public Services
    BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
    INTRODUCTION
    The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind,
    THE UNITED STATES
    HAS INTRODUCED AT THE SIXTEENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS A PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD.
    This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:
    FIRST, THERE MUST BE IMMEDIATE DISARMAMENT ACTION:
    A STRENUOUS AND UNINTERRUPTED EFFORT MUST BE MADE TOWARD THE GOAL OF GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.
    Second, ALL DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS MUST BE SUBJECT TO EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS:
    The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.
    Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:
    There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand AND THE BUILDING UP OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE-KEEPING MACHINERY AND INSTITUTIONS ON THE OTHER. NATIONS ARE UNLIKELY TO SHED THEIR MEANS OF SELF-PROTECTION IN THE ABSENCE OF ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO SAFEGUARD THEIR LEGITIMATE INTERESTS.
    THIS CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE PROGRESSIVE STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
    UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS
    AND BY CREATING A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE TO ENFORCE THE PEACE AS THE DISARMAMENT PROCESS PROCEEDS.
    ________________________________________
    There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

    ————————————————
    THIS IS A SUMMARY… full text shall be posted next

    ——————————————————
    DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
    The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
    THE DISBANDING OF ALL NATIONAL ARMED FORCES AND THE PROHIBITION OF THEIR REESTABLISHMENT IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED TO PRESERVE INTERNAL ORDER AND FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE;
    The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED FOR A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE AND FOR MAINTAINING INTERNAL ORDER;
    The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, and for the maintenance of peace IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS;
    The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
    TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES
    The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form port of the total program.
    GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
    The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
    AS STATES RELINQUISH THEIR ARMS, THE UNITED NATIONS MUST BE PROGRESSIVELY STRENGTHENED IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ITS CAPACITY TO ASSURE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND THE PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES;
    Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
    Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
    Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and
    Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.
    DISARMAMENT STAGES
    The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTION.
    FIRST STAGE
    The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:
    The nuclear threat would be reduced:
    All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
    The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
    States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
    States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
    A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
    Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; THEIR PRODUCTION WOULD BE DISCONTINUED OR LIMITED; THEIR TESTING WOULD BE LIMITED OR HALTED.
    Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
    The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
    An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
    Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
    The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons of mass destruction would be prohibited.
    States would give advance notification of space vehicle and military launchings.
    U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
    MEASURES WOULD BE TAKEN TO DEVELOP AND STRENGTHEN UNITED NATIONS ARRANGEMENTS FOR ARBITRATION, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT IN STAGE II OF A PERMANENT U.N. PEACE FORCE.
    AN INTERNATIONAL DISARMAMENT ORGANIZATION would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
    Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
    It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
    It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    States would be committed to measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
    States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    A U.N. PEACE OBSERVATION GROUP would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STATES WOULD BE COMMITTED TO GIVE ADVANCE NOTICE OF MAJOR MILITARY MOVEMENTS which might cause alarm, observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    SECOND STAGE
    The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:
    Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
    Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS;
    Establishment of a permanent international peace force WITHIN THE UNITED NATIONS;
    Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
    On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
    The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
    The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.
    THIRD STAGE
    During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:
    States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    The peace keeping capabilities of the United nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    ________________________________________
    APPENDIX