+menu-


  • Category Archives Can Anyone Make a Difference?
  • U.S. Weather Modification Nov. 1966

    U.S. Weather Modification Nov. 1966

    WEATHER MODIFICATION ICAS Report No. 10a November 1966

    THIS IS A 97 PAGE U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT

    VIEW FULL DOCUMENT HERE —> http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/19680002906_1968002906.pdf

    snippets

    Over the past twenty years (from 1946?)  experiments have been conducted on

    weather modification, particularly on the effects of seedinq clouds with

    such materials as – silver iodide crystals.

    1966 There MUST be regulation and control of weather modification activities, especially as those activities increase in magnitude and frequency and become international in scope.

    1966 This is required ESPECIALLY TO PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY but also to permit valid experimentation

    ——————————————————————–

    Documents like the one linked above and below need to be shown to those that continue to deny the ongoing climate engineering reality.

    ————————————————————-

    WEATHER MODIFICATION ICAS Report No. 10a November 1966

    A Recommended National Program In WEATHER MODIFICATION

    A Report to the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences

    by Homer E. Newell

    Associate Administrator for Space Science and Application

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C.

    Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences

    The gradually accumulating evidence of positive results from efforts at

    weather modification led the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences of the

    National Academy of Sciences, in November 1963, to appoint a Panel

    on Weather and Climate Modification “to undertake a deliberate and

    thoughtful review of the present status and activities in this field.

    On June 16, 1964, the Director of the National Science Foundation announced the

     appointment of a Special Commission on Weather Modification. in its review of the

    field, the Commission activated seven subgroups to study the physical, biological, statistical,

    social, international, legal and legislative, and administration and funding aspects of

    weather and climate modification.

    —————————————————————————————–

    This is the comment that prefaced the above.

    Dane Wigington
    geoengineeringwatch.org

    The document contained below is very damning and revealing, I located it in the NASA archives in late October of 2012. It should be a stark wake up call for any that still deny the existence of massive covert weather modification programs which are coordinated by various governments around the world.

    This file report outlines in great detail the existence of expanding US weather modification programs as far back as 1956, a full decade earlier than the date of the document in question. A “special commission” is outlined in this document to coordinate the multiple governmental agencies involved with US weather modification programs as well as independent contractors and universities which the report also mentions. It covers the “management” of international impacts, legal and social ramifications, species disruptions, biological consequences, etc.

    A rapidly increasing mountain of data makes ever more clear that almost none of us alive today have known completely natural weather. That massive covert government programs have been playing “God” with the biosphere for well over 60 years, perhaps even longer. In recent years the scope and scale of these devastating weather modification programs has been ramped up so much that the entire climate system and biosphere is now hanging in the balance.

    The lethal nature of the ongoing “geoengineering” programs can not be overstated. Life on our planet is in freefall for many reasons, but mathematically speaking climate engineering is the greatest assault of all against life on Earth.

    Documents like the one linked below need to be shown to those that continue to deny the ongoing climate engineering reality. With each passing day radical fluctuations in weather continue to accelerate as a direct result of the ongoing geoengineering insanity. Geoengineering must be brought into the light of day and to a halt. Those responsible for the climate engineering programs should be seen criminals that have participated in ecocide and genocide. The corporate media and the “meteorologists” that serve them must also be exposed FOR  THEIR PART IN HIDING THE AEROSOL SPRAYING ASSAULT from public veiw. Each and every one of us are needed to assist in the most critical effort to reach critical mass of awareness, lets make every day count in this battle.

    ——————————————————————–

    APRIL 19, 2015 WHAT DID HAARP, THE US GOVERNMENT  “HIGH FREQUENCY “ACTIVE AURORAL” RESEARCH PROGRAM” … DO TO OUR NATURAL WEATHER?

    ——————————————————————-

    In 1966 There MUST be regulation and control of weather modification activities, especially as those activities increase in magnitude and frequency and become international in scope.

     In 1966 This is REQUIRED especially to provide A MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY.

    ——————————————————————————————

     APRIL 19, 2015

    WHAT DID HAARP, THE US GOVERNMENT  “HIGH FREQUENCY “ACTIVE AURORAL” RESEARCH PROGRAM” … DO TO OUR NATURAL WEATHER?

    Its purpose, intent, how long it was held secret? 

    WHAT WENT WRONG WITH HAARP?

    Why did the U.S.  government SHUT it down?

    WHERE THERE HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY?

     1. What did HAARP do?

    2. Did HAARP change the humidity?

    3. Did HAARP change weather?

    4.Did HAARP change the climate?

    5. Did HAARP change the JET STREAM?

    ——————————————————————

    HAS THE U.S.  CONGRESS PROVIDED A MECHANISM FROM 1966 THRU 2015 FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY?

    ———————————————————–

    HAARP

    The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program – NRL

    www.nrl.navy.mil/…technology

    United States Naval Research Laboratory

    Information Technology Division … We present a description of the major components of the HAARP Gakona Facility … of the value of THESE FREQUENCIES to the Navy for undersea applications. …. About NRL · Mission · History · Commanding Officer · Director of Research · Reserve Program · Inspector General · NRL Web Sites.

    —————————————————————————

     GOD FORBID THAT ANY AMERICAN CITIZEN COMPLAIN?

      Are they Crazy or WHAT?

    Thousands upon thousands, perhaps even millions? of worldwide observers, are and have been labeled as conspiracy theory nut cases, wearing tinfoil hats.. (don’t ever say the C word)

     Perhaps, the observers  of the spectacularly  changes in the visual sky images of jet streams and contrails, are just suffering from some visual mass hysteria.  And, those crazy people are Ignoring the overall increase in air traffic that has spectacularly changed the visual sky images of jet streams and contrails?

    And, What about those THESE FREQUENCIES to the Navy for undersea applications?

    ————————————————-

    APRIL 19, 2015 WHAT DID HAARP,   “HIGH FREQUENCY “ACTIVE AURORAL” RESEARCH PROGRAM” … DO TO OUR NATURAL WEATHER?

    About that  “ACTIVE AURORAL” ?

    By definition, AURORAL REFERS TO THAT DISPLAY––you might describe it as a show of auroral light. The best known aurora is the aurora borealis, otherwise known as the northern lights.

    THE AURORA BOREALIS A NATURAL ELECTRICAL PHENOMENON characterized by the appearance of streamers of reddish or greenish light in the sky, usually near the northern or southern MAGNETIC pole.

    ———————————————————————

    APRIL 19, 2015 WHAT DID HAARP DO TO OUR “NATURAL” WEATHER?

     A rapidly increasing mountain of data makes ever more clear that ALMOST NONE OF US ALIVE TODAY HAVE KNOWN COMPLETELY NATURAL WEATHER.

     —————————————————————————————

    ‘CLIMATE CHAOS’ IN 2015: Strange Events/Apocalyptic …

    investmentwatchblog.com/climate-chaos-in-2015-strange-eventsapocaly…

    Dec 15, 2014 – Warning: Strange weather events increasing around the world 2015 … Events/Apocalyptic Sounds Increasing Around The World (2014-15).

    —————————————————————————————————

     APRIL 19, 2015

      DID HAARP PLAY A PART IN DESTROYING OUR “NATURAL” WEATHER?

     ——————————————————————-

    WOULD THIS HAVE BEEN THE REAL “NATURAL” WEATHER HORROR STORY?

    Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs)

    Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) reach Earth affecting planetary MAGNETICS, SPARKING GEOMAGNETIC STORMS, shifting ocean AND JET STREAM currents in the Pacific Ring of Fire, creating unusual and EXTREME GLOBAL WEATHER PATTERNS, creating unstoppable Earth changes, and affecting the behavior patterns of all sentient life forms.

    —————————————————————————

     Study finds more evidence for link between wavy jet stream …

    phys.org › Earth › Earth Sciences

    Phys.org

    Feb 18, 2015 – Francis and other researchers say the jet stream’s configuration was a key … This does not bode well for impacts of extreme weather and the … A CLEAR “ATMOSPHERIC” RESPONSE AND LINKING IT TO A PARTICULAR CAUSE MAY TAKE ANOTHER …

     Very wavy jet-stream patterns have been occurring more often since the 1990s, Francis says, and are now affecting weather around the northern hemisphere. This mid-February cold snap, for example, that has left millions of people waking up to below-zero and single-digit temperatures, might not be as deep as some southward dips, called troughs, in the jet stream. But the overall pattern has been around for weeks, and is also responsible for Boston’s record snowfall this winter and the worsening drought in western states.

    Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-evidence-link-wavy-jet-stream.html#jCp

    —————————————————————————————————–

    A CLEAR ATMOSPHERIC RESPONSE AND LINKING IT TO A PARTICULAR CAUSE MAY TAKE ANOTHER …

    READING IN THE U.S. CONGRESS  OF THE A 97 PAGE U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT WEATHER MODIFICATION ICAS Report No. 10a November 1966

     VIEW FULL DOCUMENT HERE —> http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/19680002906_1968002906.pdf

    snippets

    Over the past twenty years (from 1946?)  experiments have been conducted on

    weather modification, particularly on the effects of seedinq clouds with

    such materials as – silver iodide crystals.

    1966 There MUST be regulation and control of weather modification activities, especially as those activities increase in magnitude and frequency and become international in scope.

     1966 This is required ESPECIALLY TO PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR PROTECTION AGAINST HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITY but also to permit valid experimentation

     ———————————————————————————————————————————

    IF YOU WANT TO READ MORE?

     The following is a huge file with many, many, comments, about naming, monitoring and tracking  those who dare to speak or write about the “C” word conspiracy theory.

    How many conspiracy theory nut cases? wearing tinfoil hats.. that said the “C” word?

     If you’ve got a few hours?

    And, are interested in about a thousand scientific studies on the chemical residue found on the ground.

    British Columbia Chemtrail Alert | Monitoring & tracking the …

    https://britishcolumbiachemtrailalert.wordpress.com/

    Feb 24, 2015 – The theory: The white streaks behind high-flying aircraft are not ….. ionospheric heaters such AS HAARP CAN ALTER THE JET STREAM, pulling down frigid ….. Brian had created what was called The Canadian Chemtrail Petition for ..

    ——————————————————————-

    Let’s not forget about all of those, thousands upon thousands, perhaps even millions worldwide? including observers, in British Columbia,  and California, that have been labeled as conspiracy theory nut cases, wearing tinfoil hats.. (that said the “C” word)

    Perhaps, the observers  of the spectacularly  changes in the visual sky images of jet streams and contrails, are just suffering from SOME VISUAL MASS HYSTERIA.  And, those crazy people are Ignoring the overall increase in air traffic that has spectacularly changed the visual sky images of jet streams and contrails?

    And, What about those THESE FREQUENCIES to the Navy for undersea applications?

     


  • Forget About Draining the Swamp

    Forget About Draining the SWAMP

    The Government alligators have taken over WA STATE WETLANDS

    When you’re up to your butt in alligators, it’s easy to forget that the initial objective was to drain the swamp.

    (idiomatic) When performing a long and complex task, and when you’ve gotten utterly immersed in secondary and tertiary unexpected tangential subtasks, it’s easy to lose sight of the initial objective. This sort of distraction can be particularly problematic if the all-consuming subtask or sub-subtask is not, after all, particularly vital to the original, primary goal, but ends up sucking up time and resources (out of all proportion to its actual importance) only because it seems so urgent.
    ————————————————————————–

    Wetland Program Plan (WPP)

    Final WPP Now Available

    In March 2015, Ecology and the Interagency Work Group finalized the state’s Wetland Program Plan. The plan is a strategic tool, developed and implemented by the state, to articulate what the state seeks to accomplish with the wetland program over time. A strategy is necessary for an effective program that protects wetlands and strives to meet the state’s goal of no net loss and an overall net gain in wetland resources.

    This plan is organized around six core elements: regulation, monitoring and assessment, voluntary restoration and protection, water quality standards, education and outreach, and sustainable financing. These elements are critical to the success of the program. This plan outlines work for a six-year timeframe and sets a longer-term vision for future actions.

    >More background information

    Download the Plan

    State Interagency Work Group

    Many agencies play a role in the protection and management of wetland resources in Washington State, in coordination with local governments and federal partners. Current state partners include the:

    Program Matrix

    During the development of the draft WPP, state agencies on the Interagency Work Group, as well as other agencies with a role in protecting and managing wetlands, were asked to identify aspects of their existing programs that fell within each of the EPA core elements.  The information was compiled into a wetland program matrix.  This matrix served as the baseline from which this plan was developed.

    >Download the Program Matrix

    If you have questions about an agency program, please contact the agency. If you have questions about the matrix in general or the Washington Wetland Program Plan, please contact the plan coordinator (see below).

    Update on Past Planning Efforts

    State Wetland Integration Strategy and Mitigation that Works Forum Report

    There were two major planning efforts in the past that provided direction and context for developing this plan: the State Wetland Integration Strategy (SWIS, 1994) and the Mitigation that Works Forum report (2008). These guiding documents have shaped the state’s wetland program and demonstrate the importance and value of long-term planning and agency coordination. We will be posting an overview of the recommendations and implementation actions of SWIS and the Making Mitigation Work Report on this web page. For each action, we will include an update on the status, current priority, and if and where it is included in the Wetland Program Plan action tables. In progress, please check back.

    Contact

    Susan Buis
    (360) 407-7653
    susan.buis@ecy.wa.gov

    ————————————————————————————————-

    This is a major policy change especially with the NEW “all wet areas are connected” science synthesis proposed by EPA.

    ————————————————————————————————–

    Meanwhile, the ABSOLUTE WETTEST PLACES IN THE CONTINENTAL United States are located in the Pacific Northwest, with Washington State’s Aberdeen Reservoir taking the top spot with an average yearly precipitation of 130.6 inches (3317mm).

    http://usatravel.about.com/od/Weather/ss/Wettest-Places-in-the-USA.htm

    SO? IF YOU LIVE IN WA STATE, THE  ABSOLUTELY WETTEST PLACES IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES? AND  YOU’VE GOT ALL OF YOUR MUD PUDDLES, CONNECTED TO ALL OF YOUR WETLANDS AND THEY ARE ALL CONNECTED TO ALL OF THE WET AREAS ON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY?

    WHEN ARE OUR WA STATE  ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES GOING TO START ACTING, REACTING AND OBJECTING TO THE FAIRNESS OF THE EPA WASHINGTON WETLAND PLAN FOR THE  ABSOLUTELY WETTEST PLACES IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES?

    Washington State Senate

    APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE — LIMITATIONS … 42.36.080, Disqualification based on doctrine — Time limitation for raising challenge. 42.36.

    • Municipal Research and Services Center

      Feb 5, 2015 – Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine in Washington State, MRSC Report no.11 Rev., April 2011.

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    SO? THE EPA FUNDED/GRANTED (taxpayer money) FOR THE WASHINGTON WETLAND PLAN?
    WHO IS GOING TO FUND THE ECONOMIC DISASTER THAT FOLLOWS?

    Washington State Wetland Program Plan – Access Washington

    https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/…/1406005.html
    WorkSource

    Washington State Wetland Program Plan … VIEW NOW: Acrobat PDF format (Number of pages: 115) (Publication Size: 4391KB) Core Elements Action Tables

    ———————————————————————————-

    Summary of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Quick Links

    2 USC §1501 et seq (1995)

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) was enacted to avoid imposing unfunded federal mandates on state, local, and tribal governments (SLTG), or the private sector. Most of UMRA’s provisions apply to proposed and final rules:

    • for which a general notice of proposed rule making was published, and
    • that include a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure of funds by state, local, or tribal governments (SLTG), in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year.

    If a rule meets these conditions, the agency must:

    • Prepare a written statement that includes:
      • the legal authority for the rule,
      • a cost-benefit assessment,
      • a description of the macro-economic effects, and
      • a summary of SLTG concerns and how they were addressed.
    • Consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and select the least costly, least burdensome, or most cost-effective option that achieves the objectives of the rule, or explain why the agency did not make such a choice.
    • Consult with elected officers of SLTG (or their designated employees with authority to act on their behalf) to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of proposed rules containing significant federal intergovernmental mandates.

    Section 203 of UMRA applies to all regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Before establishing a requirement that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments, §203 requires federal agencies to develop a plan to:

    • provide notice of the requirements to potentially affected small governments;
    • enable officials of small governments to provide meaningful and timely input for any proposal containing significant federal intergovernmental mandates; and
    • inform, educate, and advise small governments on compliance with the requirements.