+menu-


  • Category Archives By God by George
  • More DOE Fees Increased By Rule

    ——————————————————————–

    ——————————

    —– Original Message —–

    From:Ballard, Laura (ECY)

    To:ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK@LISTSERV.WA.GOV

    Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 6:43 AM

    Subject: The following rulemaking adoption was filed with the Office for Chapter 173-224 WAC, Water Quality Permit Fees

    The following rulemaking adoption was filed with the Office of the Code Reviser:

    July 20, 2017

    Chapter 173-224 WAC, Water Quality Permit Fees (previously called Wastewater Discharge Permit Fees) For more information:

    http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/ruledev/wac173224/1611ov.html

    To join or leave ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK click here:

    http://listserv.wa.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK

    Thank you for using WACTrack.

    Have a good day!

    —————————————————————

    RCW 90.48.465 – Water Pollution Control requires that Ecology establish, by rule, annual fees that fund the wastewater and stormwater permit programs.

    Ecology amended Chapter 173-224 WAC – Wastewater Discharge Permit Fees. This amendment allows permit fees to be increased for Fiscal Year 2018 (July 2017 – June 30, 2018) and Fiscal Year 2019 (July 2018 – June 2019) so that we can recover the cost of administering the wastewater and stormwater programs this biennium.

    Scope of rule development

    State law (RCW 80.48.465 – Water Pollution Control) requires Ecology to fund its wastewater and stormwater permit programs through annual fees paid by permit holders.

    The proposed changes sought to continue moving the program toward payment equity between permit categories. Ecology adopted a larger percentage fee increase for underpaying categories and a smaller percentage fee increase for overpaying categories.

    Ecology’s goals in establishing the percentage splits are to honor the need for fund equity while not over-burdening the under-paying categories with an increase that is not sustainable.

    We updated rule language to account for changes in current business practices relating to electronic payment options, collection processes, and data collection. We also removed the winery general permit fee category for the 2017-19 biennium, as this new permit will not be effective until July 1, 2019.

    The adopted percentages increases by category are:

    Underpaying Fee Categories
    SFY 2018
    (July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018)
    6.37%
    • Aluminum Alloys
    • Aluminum and Magnesium Reduction Mills
    • Aluminum Forming
    • Aggregate Production – Individual and General Permits
    • Aquatic Pest Control
    • Boatyards (Individual and General Permits)
    • Coal Mining and Preparation
    • Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
    • Dairies
    • Iron and Steel
    • Metal Finishing
    • Nonferrous Metals Forming
    • Ore Mining
    • Private and State Owned Facilities
    • Shipyards
    • Stormwater Construction (Individual and General Permits)
    • Stormwater Industrial (Individual and General Permits)
    • Stormwater Municipal Phase 1 and 2 Permits
    SFY 2019
    (July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2019)
    5.58%
    Overpaying Fee Categories
    SFY 2018
    (July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018)
    5.50%
    • Aquaculture
    • Combined Industrial Waste Treatment
    • Combined Food Processing Waste Treatment
    • Combined Sewer Overflow System
    • Commercial Laundry
    • Crop Preparing (Individual and General Permits Facilities
    • Not Otherwise Classified (Individual and General Permits)
    • Flavor Extraction
    • Food Processing
    • Fuel and Chemical Storage
    • Hazardous Waste Cleanup Sites
    • Ink Formulation and Printing
    • Inorganic Chemicals Manufacturing Noncontact Cooling Water With Additives (Individual and General Permits)
    • Noncontact Cooling Water Without Additives (Individual and General Permits)
    • Municipal Wastewater – >250,000 Residential Equivalents
    • Organic Chemical Manufacturing
    • Petroleum Refining
    • Photofinishers
    • Power and/or Steam Plants
    • Radioactive Effluents and Discharges
    • RCRA Corrective Action Sites
    • Seafood Processing
    • Solid Waste Sites
    • Textile Mills
    • Timber Products
    • Vegetable/Bulb Washing Facilities
    • Vehicle Maintenance and Freight Transfer
    • Water Plants (Individual and General Permits)
    SFY19
    (July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2019
    4.50%

    More information on the fees is available for Fiscal Years 2018 and 2019.

    INDEED, THE DOE DID…..  update their rules language to account for changes in current business practices relating to electronic payment options, collection processes, and data collection.

    ———————————————————————-

    More information on DOE  fees is available……

    WHERE THE GOVERNMENT DOES MOST OF MY BUSINESS!

    Behind My Back | Drowning in Stormwater Runoff Tax?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/03/16/drowning-in-stormwater-runoff-tax/

    Mar 16, 2014WHO IS Drowning in WA STATE Stormwater Runoff Tax? …. http://daily.sightline.org/2013/05/09/the-skinny-on-was-new-stormwater-permits-1/.

    THE Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program (RSMP)

    Participants in The Phase I and II permit will help fund the monitoring and data analysis  (KING COUNTY, FOR EXAMPLE, MUST PAY $15,000 FOR THE FIRST YEAR AND $74,540 FOR SUBSEQUENT YEARS TO PARTICIPATE.)

    The updated rules are contained in the state’s new Municipal Stormwater permits which are administered by the Washington Department of Ecology.

    ECOLOGY IS DESIGNATED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TO UPHOLD THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT

    Phase I Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit

    (COERCED) Participants in THE PHASE I permit will help fund the monitoring and data analysis. (KING COUNTY, FOR EXAMPLE, MUST PAY $15,000 FOR THE FIRST YEAR AND $74,540 FOR SUBSEQUENT YEARS TO PARTICIPATE. in The Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program (RSMP)

    Phase II Western Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit

    The Phase II permit for western Washington covers at least 80 cities and portions of five counties with an effective date of September 1, 2012. The updated 2013-2018 permit became effective on August 1, 2013.

    The new PHASE II MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT, which covers the next most populated areas and affects nearly 100 cities around the state.

    (COERCED) Participants in THE PHASE II permit will help fund the monitoring and data analysis.

    ECOLOGY IS DESIGNATED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TO UPHOLD THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT


  • WA Gov. Inslee (D) “The Taxman Cometh”

    HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2017-2019 WA STATE BUDGET

    On page on page 15 OF 43

    OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS, STATE REVENUE COLLECTIONS AS A

    SHARE OF THE ECONOMY HAVE FALLEN BY NEARLY 30%

     —————————————————————

    INDEED, THE DEMOCRATIC TAXMEN SHALL COMETH TO APPROPRIATE 2017-2019.

    WHAT ELSE COULD A WORKING TAXPAYER EXPECT FROM  A LEGISLATURE CONTROLLED  BY DEMOCRAT’S AND A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR INSLEE WITH VETO POWER

    READ IT AND WEEP  (locate your local food bank)

    2017–19 budget & policy highlights – Public School Employees of …

    pseclassified.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/70/files/2016/12/Budget-Highlights.pdf

    INSLEE’S PROPOSED BUDGET would fully fund basic education and set new course … job of fully funding Washington’s schools. … which will require billions of dollars in new state support.

    BUT THERE ARE NEEDS BEYOND ……

    MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT IS ALSO INCREASED TO MEET FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.

    Budget highlights – Office of Financial Management – Access Washington

    www.ofm.wa.gov › Budget › State Budgets › 2017-19 Governor’s proposed budgets

    Bold Action Now: Proposed 2017–19 Budget Highlights … Natural Resources; General Government; State Employees; Transportation; Capital; Budget Summary …

    —————————————————————–

    WHY CALL IT “THE NEW NORMAL “IN WA STATE?

    WHEN, THIS ” IS NORMAL” FOR THE GOV INSLEE AND HIS DEMOCRATS…

    June 2017 In what has become THE NEW NORMAL, Washington state lawmakers are expected to go into a third special sessions … In 2013, it took 156 days and three special sessions. …

    2nd Special Session ends, 3rd starts with Inslee vowing to veto “stop …

    www.spokesman.com/…/2nd-special-session-day-30-could-also-be-3rd-special-sessio…

    Jun 21, 2017 – Second special session ended and a third one started Wednesday as … time in state history a Legislature failed to pass a two-year budget before … state’s public school system mandated by the Washington Supreme Court.

    ———————————————————

    OFM | Governor Jay Inslee’s Proposed 2017-19 Budget

    ofm.wa.gov/budget17/default.asp

    Details of the 2017–19 Book 1 (“current law”) budget are available at the Washington State Fiscal Information website. The “Book 1” budget does not reflect the (what?) … Governor’s proposal to the Legislature.

    ———————————————————-

    PRIORITY  BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BILLS PASSED BY THE CONTROLLING DEMOCRATS

    INDEED THE DEMOCRATIC TAXMEN MUST COMETH TO APPROPRIATE 2017-2019.

    WHATEVER THE COST TO WA STATE WORKING TAXPAYERS?

    —————————————————

     

    ———————————————-

     School funding: Fines hit $67 million, still no McCleary fix from WA …

    www.bellinghamherald.com/article155432304.html

    Jun 11, 2017 – Contempt of court fines over school funding in Washington state will hit $67 million this week, but the Legislature still can’t agree on HOW TO PAY FOR BASIC EDUCATION. … Court imposed a $100,000 penalty for each day the Legislature failed to … “The important thing is to get the school-funding formula right, and …

    —————————————————————————————

    TWO REALLY BIG QUESTIONS. 

    WHO POCKETED  THE $67,000,000.00 MILLION DOLLARS IN FINES?  

    WHAT DID THE COURT DO WITH THE MONEY?

    ———————————————————————–

    WHATEVER THE COST TO WA STATE TAXPAYERS?

    THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 The U.S. Supreme Court found that “the plain intent of Congress in enacting” the ESA “was to halt and reverse the trend toward species extinction, WHATEVER THE COST.”

     WA STATE BUDGET 2019-2019 MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT IS ALSO INCREASED TO MEET FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.

    —————————————————————–

    PRIORITY  BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BILLS PASSED BY CONTROLLING DEMOCRATS

    2017-19 CAPITAL APPROPRIATIONS Bill (HB 1075 / SB 5086)

    ————————————————————————————-

     DEMOCRAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON HAS A LOT TO DO WITH THE 2017-2019 BUDGET.

    MAY 19, 2017 WA STATE  DEMOCRAT  ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON  APPEALED  THE MULTI-BILLION BATTLE OVER SALMON CULVERTS, AND WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON LOST IT!

    COSTING WA STATE WORKING TAXPAYER’S BILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO REPLACE FISH CULVERTS.

    ————————————————————–

    Washington state loses big legal battle over salmon culverts | The …

    www.seattletimes.com/…/washington-state-loses-big-legal-battle-over-salmon-culverts/

    May 19, 2017 – “Fixing fish-blocking culverts under state roads will open upANOTHER,  9TH CIRCUIT COURT’S,  U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RICARDO MARTINEZ  (DECLINED TO EVEN CONSIDER WA STATE’S APPEAL) FORCING WA STATE TO SPEND BILLIONS TO REPLACE CULVERTS THAT IN SOME …

     —————————————————————

    Jun 27, 2016 – By 2030, the state must replace about 800 highway culverts at a cost of … the court upheld virtually all of the findings of THE  9TH CIRCUIT COURT’S DECISION. U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE RICARDO MARTINEZ DECISION. … Washington tribes by allowing culverts that diminish salmon runs. … The ruling also applies to culverts owned by the state Department of Fish and …

     ————————————————————————————–

    2013 Martinez gave the state 15 years to reopen 90 percent of the habitat blocked by its culverts in western Washington. The state has said replacing its culverts will cost at least $2 billion. Between 2013-15, the state corrected 76 fish-blocking culverts.

    At the current schedule, replacing the remaining 800 culverts would be completed by 2060 – 30 years past the deadline, according to the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.

    —————————————————–

    WHATEVER THE COST TO WA STATE TAXPAYERS?

    WA STATE BUDGET  2017-2019  Adds  funding to meet court-ordered removal of

    Fish passage barrier removal fish passage barriers to improve fish access to habitat. This represents a $145.3 million increase over current funding levels and provides an average biennial spending level of about $90.0 million over the next 16 years. ($97.5 million  2017–19; $724.0 million over 16 years)

     ——————————————————————————-

     May 2, 2017 MEET BOB FERGUSON WA State Attorney General…

    JULY 14, 2017 Perhaps by now, you’ve already heard of him?

     In the space of a few days, WA State Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat just beginning his second term, has gone from unknown state attorney general in the far corner of the country to making national headlines.. Fergeson’s quote  I wouldn’t have filed it if I didn’t think I was going to win; after appealing a federal case before a  9th circuit court judge and winning a stay.

    ———————————————————

    May 2, 2017 MEET BOB FERGUSON

    Now a toast of the progressive community, Ferguson views the law as a profoundly moral enterprise.

    FERGUSON IS A REMARKABLY HUMBLE, PRIVATE MAN….

    HE SAID, “WHEN I RAN FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL IN 2012, I WOULD TELL PEOPLE I BELIEVE THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO BE THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL POSITION IN GOVERNMENT”

    SOME WOULD SAY THAT FERGUSON IS OBSESSIVE:

    BOB FERGUSON SAID, “After the shock [of Trump’s election victory] wore off,” the attorney general said, speaking by phone from the state capital of Olympia. “I WANTED MY OFFICE TO BE READY IN CASE PRESIDENT TRUMP ATTEMPTED TO DELIVER ON SOME OF HIS CAMPAIGN PROMISES……

    ( LOL JULY 14, 2017)

    ———————————–

    As a school kid, Ferguson would frequently neglect to do his homework so he could spend more time on the game.

    When the order  was unveiled, WA STATE  DEMOCRAT  Attorney General Bob Ferguson  was meeting with other Democratic state attorneys general in Fort Lauderdale, discussing likely challenges they would face from the Trump administration on immigration law, civil rights, environmental regulations, and other key policy areas.

    SOME WOULD SAY THAT FERGUSON IS OBSESSIVE:

    Within minutes of the order being signed, Ferguson’s team—including an expanded civil-rights division, which he had prepared over the past several months for just such a moment, and which had been in contact with Democratic attorneys general nationwide to work out how to respond to such actions—

    “The reason I went to law school is because when used in the right way, the law can have a profound impact on people in really personal ways.”

     https://www.thenation.com/article/meet-bob-ferguson-the-washington-state-attorney-general-who-shut-down-trumps-muslim-ban/

    ———————————————————————-

     So, In the space of a few days, WA State Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat just beginning his second term, has gone from unknown state attorney general in the far corner of the country to making national headlines.

    9th U.S. Circuit Court  Judge James L. Robart, 69,  blocked President Trumps temporary immigration ban and the … decision – later upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals –

    AND,  Jun 26, 2017 THE US SUPREME COURT In a partial win for President Trump, the court said a limited travel ban could. PRESIDENT TRUMP  later tweeted: “Very grateful for the 9-O decision from the U. S. Supreme Court. .

    AND WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL BOB FERGUSON (D) LOST IT!

    —————————————————————————————-

    JULY 14, 2017 INDEED, YOU MUST MEET (TWO TIME LOSER)  BOB FERGUSON

    Meet Bob Ferguson, the Washington State Attorney General Who Shut …

    https://www.thenation.com/…/meet-bob-ferguson-the-washington-state-attorney-gener…

    May 2, 2017 – Now a toast of the progressive community, Ferguson views the law as a profoundly moral enterprise.


  • BCC? The Blind leading the Blind?

    BLIND LEADING THE BLIND definition.An expression applied to leaders who know as little as their followers and are therefore likely to lead them astray:

    I submit this, as my comment and question?

    The huge  NGO email lists, with email address and names I received were, an INSPIRATION to me. These huge special interest global NGO entities know exactly how to promote their green agenda. One NGO bragged on their website that they had sent over 20,000 EMAILS to WA DC legislators, they brag about how they are able to influence our elected representatives voting.

    If these  HUGE NGO email lists, with email address and names, gives NGO’s  the POLITICAL CLOUT to create legislated laws of our land?

    What do we have to fight back with, they are organized, their agenda is “21”?  We have hundreds, thousands, of splinter groups, we have so many with different causes,  beliefs and ideas?

    We all fight back in our own way. I am certainly not an authority on how anyone should  fight back.

    ———————————————

    I am simply fighting back in my own way

    I NEVER BLIND COPY (BCC) for my own  purpose and intent.

    HOW STUPID OR WHATEVER, WOULD I BE?

    IF AFTER,  I  RESEARCHED, DOCUMENTED, DOCUMENTED, DOCUMENTED, COPIED, CUT, PASTED, COMMENTED, POSTED, AND THEN EMAILED BCC?

    WHAT PURPOSE WOULD I SERVE, IF I BBC? IF I FAILED TO BE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT,

    “LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IS A HUGE POLITICAL ADVANTAGE,” “AND BASICALLY, CALL IT THE STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN VOTER OR WHATEVER, BUT BASICALLY THAT WAS REALLY, REALLY, CRITICAL FOR THE THING TO PASS.”- JONATHAN GRUBER, THE MIT HEALTH ECONOMIST FOR OBAMACARE

    ————————————————————————————————

    IF I FAILED TO SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY  THE What? Who? Where? When? How? Why?

     I WOULD SIMPLY BE PROMOTING THE CRITICAL STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN VOTER OR WHATEVER  AND PERPETUATING THE SOCIAL PHENOMENA  OF leaders who know as little as their followers, THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND, and  are therefore likely to lead them astray:

    ———————————————————–

    IT WAS JUST ONE MORE DOCUMENTED EXAMPLE, JUST MORE PROOF THAT HUGE GREEN NGO GROUPS ARE MORE ORGANIZED, MORE INFORMED, SENDING MORE INFORMATION TO MORE GREEN PEOPLE AND CONTROLLING MORE OF OUR GOVERNMENT.

    One NGO bragged on their website that they had sent over 20,000 EMAILS to WA DC legislators

    ——————————————————————–

    WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

    Huge NGO SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS ARE Political Game Changers

    The power of cyberspace reflected on Face book, twitter, tweet, blogs, EMAILS and websites have become HUGE POLITICAL GAME CHANGERS.

    ———————————————————————

    WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

    (BCC) Blind listed?  Blindsided? or Black listed?

     (BCC) Blind listed, blind carbon copy in Technology Expand. messaging. (BCC) An electronic mail header which lists addresses to which a message should be sent, but which will not be seen by the recipients. Bcc is defined in RFC 822 and supported by most e-mail systems.

    Blindsided by definition catch (someone) unprepared; attack from an unexpected position. hit or attack (someone) on the blind side.

    Black listed  by definition, (or black list) is a list or register of entities or people who, for one reason or another, ARE BEING DENIED a particular privilege, service, mobility, ACCESS or recognition.

    ————————————————————-

    WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

    WHY I NEVER BLIND COPY?

    I explained it to Lois, I send my emails to concerned people and groups in about 10 to 15 counties in WA State. Most of the concerned people and groups have been involved in litigation and or appeals with WA State government.

    I send my POSTED COMMENTS AND EMAILS to the “servants of the people”  federal, state and local government ELECTED representative, the anointed appointed etc.

    It is my intention to let these “servants of the people” know, by using the very old journalistic cliché that stories, documented POSTINGS, EMAILS, COMMENTS should always contain answers to these six questions:

    What? Who? Where? When? How? Why?

    What the hell  these  “servants of the people”  doing?

    Who are these “servants of the people”?

    Where are these “servants of the people”?

    When are these “servants of the people”?

    How are these people “servants of the people”?

    AND WHY ARE THESE “servants of the people”?

    How STUPID, would I be,  to identify “servants of the people” as  UNKNOWN SOMEBODY’S?

    —————————————————————————————————

    REPEATED FOR EMPHASIS

    “LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IS A HUGE POLITICAL ADVANTAGE,” “AND BASICALLY, CALL IT THE STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN VOTER OR WHATEVER, BUT BASICALLY THAT WAS REALLY, REALLY, CRITICAL FOR THE THING TO PASS.”- JONATHAN GRUBER, THE MIT HEALTH ECONOMIST FOR OBAMACARE

    HOW STUPID OR WHATEVER, WOULD I BE? HOW STUPID IF AFTER,  I  RESEARCHED, DOCUMENTED, DOCUMENTED, DOCUMENTED, COPIED, CUT, PASTED, COMMENTED, POSTED, AND EMAILED AS BBC?

    WHAT PURPOSE WOULD I SERVE, IF I BBC? IF I FAIL TO BE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT, IF I FAIL TO SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY  THE What? Who? Where? When? How? Why?

    I WOULD SIMPLY BE PROMOTING THE CRITICAL STUPIDITY OF THE AMERICAN VOTER OR WHATEVER  AND PERPETUATE THE SOCIAL PHENOMENA  OF THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND.

    AS, applied to leaders who know as little as their followers and are therefore likely to lead them astray.

    ——————————————————————————————–

    ASTRAY?

    Behind My Back | Living in Law-Law Land?

    www.behindmyback.org/2015/02/16/3245/

    5 days ago – LIVING IN WA STATE LAWLAW, LA-LA LAND? Definition of LA-LA … www.behindmyback.org/2013/10/16/by-hook-or-by-crook/. Oct 16, 2013 …

    ——————————————————————–

    LEGISLATORS LAWS OF WA STATE LAND?

    April 24, 2011  Welcome to the Washington State Law Library

    OVER 55,000 TITLES AND OVER 330,000, YES, THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THOUSAND VOLUMES OF LAW. Our Tax dollars, elected officials and their legislation have provides us with the Washington State Law Library and “Welcomes? us to it”

    FEB, 21,  2015 they have changed the name?

    Hmmm… Go figure?  REALLY? WELCOME TO GEORGE?

    The State Law Library’s primary mission is to serve the Supreme Court, the Legislature, the … The State Law Library’s On-Line Public Access Catalog GEORGE ? The State Law Library’s On-Line Public Access Catalog

    —————————————————————————————–

    Hmmm…  WELCOME TO GEORGE?  “BY GEORGE”

    I DIGRESS TO LONG BEFORE THE YEAR 1598, BUT “BY GEORGE” YOU WILL ENJOY THIS

    The reference is British. St. George is the patron saint of English. HE ALLEGEDLY “SLEW DRAGONS.” “By George” is considered to be a very mild oath. It was originally “Before George.” It also appears as “For George” and “Fore George.”
    The first record of its appearance in WRITTEN English was in the year 1598, by Ben Jonson. The “by George” version was first used by Fielding in 1731. Gradually, the “for and fore and before” were dropped AND THE “BY GEORGE” REMAINED.
    IT WAS USED, ORALLY, AS A BATTLE CRY LONG BEFORE 1598, but no one knows exactly when. The dictionary traces only the first WRITTEN use of words and phrases.

    Source: http://en.allexperts.com/q/Etymology-Mea…

    This type of word/phrase usage is called an “expletive attributive”.

    OLD LADY answered 6 years ago

    “BY GEORGE” The actual origin is in sixteenth century England, when the church was in turmoil and was ATTEMPTING TO EXERT ITSELF AND GAIN MORE CONTROL OVER THE LIVES OF THE PEOPLE. Swearing was blasphemy — and brought either a fine or a penance. So instead of saying, ‘by God,’ people started saying ‘by George’ AND THE CHURCH PEOPLE COULDN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT

    ——————————————————————————————————

    BY GEORGE, BY GOD

     Feb 21, 2015 WA STATE CITIZENS ARE LIVING IN WA STATES LAW-LAW, LA-LA-LAND

     ————————————————————

    BY GEORGE, BY GOD

    HOW MUCH WORSE CAN LIVING IN WA STATE IT GET?

    ———————————————————

    WA STATE CITIZENS HAVE BEEN, ARE BEING TAKEN FOR A RIDE ON ECOLOGY’S WAC TRACK

    BY GEORGE? BY GOD? HOW BAD IS ECOLOGY’S WAC TRACK?

     ARE WA STATE LEGISLATORS ON THE WRONG TRACK? OR DERAILED?

    Behind My Back | High, Dry and Destitute

    www.behindmyback.org/2015/02/01/highdry-and-destitute/

    Feb 1, 2015 – High, Dry and Destitute WA State citizens, private property owners and … category and have previously been posted on “behindmyback.org”.

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/10/16/by-hook-or-by-crook/ …… have been left HIGH, DRY AND DESTITUTE by WA State DOE WATER RULES.

    Feb 21, 2015  BY GEORGE? BY GOD?  WA STATE LEGISLATORS  ARE ON THE WRONG TRACK

    ——————————————————————-

     Feb. 21, 2015  OLD AMERICAN LADY’S SOLUTION

    BY GEORGE, BY GOD,  A BATTLE CRY BY “WE THE PEOPLE”

    AGAINST  A GOVERNMENT, ATTEMPTING TO EXERT ITSELF AND GAIN MORE CONTROL OVER THE LIVES OF “WE THE PEOPLE”

    AND, THE GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SERVANTS CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE WE ARE GUARANTEED FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY THE UNITED STATE CONSTITUTION

     BY GOD,  BY GEORGE, WE MUST USE IT OR LOSE IT

    to be continued….