+menu-


  • Category Archives An Undisclosed Agenda
  • Trump Drain the (SES) Veteran’s Swamp

    Trump Drain the (SES) Veteran’s  Swamp

    DRAIN THE WA DC SWAMP OF THE UNTOUCHABLE SENIOR EXECUTIVES (SES) IN THE VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION.

    TRUMP VOWED TO PROTECT OUR AMERICAN VETERAN’S, UNFORTUNATELY THERE ARE AT LEAST 300  OF THESE CORRUPT UNTOUCHABLES STILL IN “CAREER POSITIONS”  IN  THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

    STEVE BANNON HAS BEEN APPOINTED AS TRUMP’S CHIEF STRATEGIST.

    WHAT IS STEVE’S STRATEGY TO REMOVE THESE UNTOUCHABLE (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES FROM THE VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION SWAMP?

    WHAT IS THE SCHEME, WHICH IMPAIRS THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO SUPERVISE THE EXECUTION OF THE FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE LAWS?

     ———————————————

    “SECTION 707 THUS VESTS A FEDERAL EMPLOYEE WITH THE FINAL AUTHORITY 

     UNREVIEWABLE BY ANY POLITICALLY ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH 

    — to determine whether to uphold the removal of a [Department of Veterans Affairs], which includes the power to overrule the decision of a Cabinet-level officer,” she wrote. “That scheme, which impairs the President’s ability to supervise the execution of the federal civil service laws, is inconsistent with the Appointments Clause.”

    ——————————————————

    THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S GOVERNMENT AGENDA FOR THIS BEHIND OUR BACKS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS UNTOUCHABLES, (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES, CORRUPT, LAYER OF POWER AND GREED IN THE VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION OR ANY OTHER BRANCH OF AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT.

    —————————————————————————-

    History is a reminder…

    Do you remember the Veteran’s Administration scandal?

     When none of us had ever heard of the SENIOR EXECUTIVES (SES)?

    VA Fired 2,247 People Last Year, But Only 2 Were Senior Executives …

    www.govexec.com/management/2014/…/vafiredwereseniorexecutives/85528/

    May 30, 2014

    ———————————————————————————-

    HOW UNTOUCHABLE WERE THE VA (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES?

    HOW MANY (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES GOT FIRED FOR THIS ATROCITY?

    IG report: 300,000 vets died while waiting for health care at VA | Fox …

    www.foxnews.com/…/ig-report-close-to-300000-vets-died-while-waiting-for-health-c…

    SEP 3, 2015 – WASHINGTON – More than 300,000 American military veterans likely died while waiting for health care — and nearly twice as many are still waiting — according to a new Department of Veterans Affairs inspector general report. The IG report says “serious” problems with …

    ——————————————————————————-

    ACCORDING TO THE APRIL 22, 2015  NEW YORK TIMESTHE ACTUAL NUMBER IS: ZERO.

    As the Times recalls, soon after the “Sixty heads rolled!” headlines were written, the Department of Veterans Affairs backpedaled and said that only 14 people had actually been removed. THAT WAS A LIE, TOO.

    AS SO OFTEN IN THE OBAMA YEARS, IT FELL TO A COMMITTEE OF CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS TO FLOG THE TRUTH OUT OF THE ADMINISTRATION, AND IT TOOK MONTHS OF EFFORT:

    The documents given this month to the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, which provided them to The New York Times, show

    THAT THE DEPARTMENT PUNISHED A TOTAL OF EIGHT OF ITS 280,000 EMPLOYEES FOR INVOLVEMENT IN THE SCANDAL.

    One was fired, one retired in lieu of termination, one’s termination is pending, and five were reprimanded or suspended for up to two months.

    The only person fired was the director of the Phoenix hospital, Sharon Helman, who technically was removed not for her role in the manipulation of waiting lists but for receiving “inappropriate gifts,” according to the department.

    In a statement released Wednesday night, the department did not dispute the numbers released by the committee, but said that more than 100 other employees were facing disciplinary action.

    ———————————————————————————–

    OVER A YEAR  AND A HALF LATER  as of OCTOBER 28, 2016 there were  still over 300 UNTOUCHABLE (SES) Senior Executives STILL EMPLOYED BY the Veteran’s Administration AND VA senior executives still collecting bonuses of over $10,000.00 a year

    Veterans Affairs Doles Out Huge Bonuses Despite Corruption

    www.disabledveterans.org › News & Legislation

    Oct 30, 2016 – October 31, 2016. 54 … She received a bonus of $9,120 in January 2016. … /politics/2016/10/28/more-bonusesva-employees-despite-ongoing-problems-agency/92837218/ … Whether they were pulling a Hillary and the size of the bonus is …. There are over 500 dead veterans [a Judge and a Reporter had …

    —————————————————————————

    VA still plagued by problems two years after scandal – Washington Times

    www.washingtontimes.com/…/3/va-still-plagued-by-problems-two-years-after-scand/

    Apr 3, 2016 –

    Two years after the scandal emerged over phony waiting lists for patients at the Department of Veterans Affairs facility in Phoenix, the department is still beset with problems ranging from fresh accusations of falsified waiting lists to a system-wide failure to discipline wrongdoing.

    “The VA is still struggling with a lack of accountability, an inability to properly manage a budget rapidly approaching $200 billion, and a failure to provide veterans with timely access to care and benefits,” said John Cooper, a spokesman for Concerned Veterans for America. “The VA is broken, and if we want veterans to be assured of a VA that works, we need to systemically reform it.”

    Employee discipline has become an embarrassment. Even in the rare cases where VA management does punish employees, the agency is being thwarted by union-backed civil service rules.

    For example, a VA employee in Puerto Rico was reinstated with back pay last month after she was fired upon being arrested for armed robbery. She pleaded guilty, but her union got her job back by arguing in a grievance that a VA manager at the facility is a registered sex offender and another VA hospital manager was once arrested for drunken driving and found in possession of pain pills.

    In Alexandria, Louisiana, a VA nursing assistant is still awaiting trial on manslaughter charges in the death of a 70-year-old Air Force veteran in 2013. Hospital officials initially called the veteran’s death an accident, but a coroner determined the veteran died from blunt force trauma to the head.

    ———————————————————————

    AS SO OFTEN IN THE OBAMA YEARS, CONGRESS WAS A SPINELESS FLOP

    ————————————————————

    VA no longer using expedited SES firing authority after Justice decision

    federalnewsradio.com › Workforce › SES

    JUN 17, 2016 VA no longer using expedited SES firing authority after Justice decision … This was in response to the committee’s inquiry over whether the department planned to … Under the Choice Act for example, VA executives can appeal to an … “Two years ago, veterans were forced to wait too long for care because …

    —————————————–

    The bottom line

    As John Cooper, a spokesman for Concerned Veterans for America said. “The VA is broken, and if we want veterans to be assured of a VA that works, we need to systemically reform it.”

     To be continued…..

    The Untouchables (SES) Senior Executives


  • WikiLeaks NSA Spies, Hillary Lies, US Demise?

    The NSA Spying scandals revealed by former U.S. intelligence analyst Edward Snowden HAS DESTROYED ALL TRUST BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT I.E. OBAMA AND HILLARY and AMERICA’S EUROPEAN ALLIES, AND BRAZIL AND MEXICO AND?

     ——————————

    THE PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS BY WIKILEAKS

    SHOWED SYSTEMATIC US TARGETING ON THE HIGHEST OFFICIALS,

    INCLUDING THREE FRENCH PRESIDENTS

    AND THE CURRENT CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY,

    ————————————————————–

    NOTE INSERT

    The Merkel document details a US intercept of the Chancellor on

    11 October 2011 and IS CLASSIFIED TWO LEVELS ABOVE TOP SECRET,

    an indicator that the material is considered highly sensitive.

    Even so, it is cleared for sharing with other members of

    THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE OF UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.

    —————————————————-

    THE FRENCH AND GERMAN ECONOMICS MINISTRIES,

    THE EU CENTRAL BANK AND A BLANKET EFFORT AGAINST ALL SIGNIFICANT FRENCH PRIVATE INDUSTRY.

    THE US ALSO EXTENSIVELY TARGETED BRAZIL’S DIPLOMACY, TARGETING THE PHONES OF ITS FOREIGN MINISTER AND ITS AMBASSADORS TO GERMANY, FRANCE, THE EU, THE US AND GENEVA.

    ———————————————————–

    THE INTERNATIONAL ANIMOSITY FROM AMERICAN ALLIES CAUSED BY OBAMA AND  HILLARY?

    (a feeling of strong dislike, ill will, or enmity that tends to display itself in action)

    IS NOT COMPLICATED…. when you connect the dots 2010-2016

    The clout that the United States enjoys in global affairs has been on the demise since Obama’s presidential inauguration in 2009.

    The bottom Line

    Oct. 24, 2016 It’s not the American People against the world…

    It’s the world against Obama and Hillary’s  foreign policy and Political agenda.

    ————————————————————–

    President Obama insulted China, Obama did not invite China to join the American-driven trans-pacific partnership Trade Pact, insisting that Beijing should not be allowed to write the rules for 21st- century commerce.

    ———————————————————–

    INTERNATIONAL ANIMOSITY IN ACTION

    The formation of Two world banks.

     To Avoid any confusion in this post, let’s call them

    THE CHINESE BEIJING BANK AND THE RUSSIAN PUTIN BANK

     THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF BOTH BANKS IS SAME I.E.?  

    Hmmm… EXCLUDING THE U.S.GOVERNMENT FROM WHAT?

    MOST OF AMERICA’S CLOSEST ALLIES SIGNED UP FOR The CHINA-LED ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK (AIIB)

    INCLUDING BRITAIN, GERMANY, AUSTRALIA AND SOUTH KOREA. ALTOGETHER 57 COUNTRIES HAVE JOINED,

    ———————————————————————————

    BRICS bank launched in China as alternative to World Bank, IMF …Jul 21, 2015 timesofindia.indiatimes.com › Business

    ——————————————————————

    Add the Brazilian target list to the previous publications by WikiLeaks

    A top secret US National Security Agency target list of 29 key Brazilian government phone numbers that were selected for intensive interception.  Read the full list of NSA high priority targets for Brazil published today here US ‘spied on Brazil and Mexico presidents’

    ——————————————————————

    INTERNATIONAL ANIMOSITY IN ACTION

    Brazil’s president cancels US state visit over spying revelations …

    www.telegraph.co.uk › … › World News › South America › Brazil

    The Daily Telegraph

    Sep 17, 2013 – Brazil’s president cancels US state visit over spying revelations … attempt to salvage the trip, is a big blow to relations between the two biggest economies in the Americas.

    The trip was expected to be a platform for deals on oil exploration and biofuels technology, and Brazil’s potential purchase of fighter jets from Chicago-based Boeing Co.

    A defense contract worth more than $4 billion that Boeing is seeking for the sale of 36 F-18 fighter jets to the Brazilian Air Force could be the main victim of the spying affair.

    BRAZILIAN OFFICIALS HAVE SAID BRAZIL CANNOT BUY SUCH STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT FROM A COUNTRY IT CANNOT TRUST.

    ———————————————————————–

    As Trump would say… “Another REALLY BAD DEAL for the US economy.”

    ————————————————————————————

    Greece and the BRICS Bank, a Forgotten Scenario? – Red (Team …

    https://www.redanalysis.org/2015/06/…/greece-and-the-brics-bank-a-forgotten-scenari…

    And,  JUN 30, 2015 – GREECE, WAS THE FIRST COUNTRY BAILED OUT BY THE NEW BRICS BANK AND FUND? … This scenario obviously assumes that such bailouts will be part of the … has no aggressive plans, will always prefer political settlement’ – Putin“, RT, …

    —————————————————————————————

    Indeed, none of the BRICS,   BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA AND SOUTH AFRICA, have an interest in a collapse of the Euro, as their aim is to favour a truly multipolar world (e.g. “‘BRICS key to multipolar world’- Putin“, The BRICS Post, 22 March 2013). Their interest is more likely to put an end of a U.S.-led unipolar world and thus to the supremacy of the U.S. Dollar, upheld by the Washington consensus, as we have followed here (see “Of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Petrodollars“, 16 April 2015;  “Risks on the USD supremacy“, 27 March 2014, etc.).

    ———————————————————————-

    57 nations approved as founder members of China-led AIIB | South …

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION  SUFFERED A HUMILIATING DIPLOMATIC DEFEAT LAST SPRING

    LEAVING THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN ON THE OUTSIDE.

    ———————————————————————–

    WikiLeaks – NSA Helped CIA Outmanoeuvre Europe on Torture

    www.statewatch.org/…/WikiLeaks-NSA-Helped-CIA-Outmanoeuvre-Europ…

    Statewatch Jul 20, 2015 – Top German NSA Targets (/nsa-germany/selectors.html). Top German NSA … era, including numbers for offices in Bonn and targeting Joschka. Fischer, Vice …. targeted by the. NSA, showing systematic mass spying on the Chancellor and the … US approach to its targeting of French officials, which showed.

    ——————————————————————–

    Obama’s global allies?

    Who Is America’s Closest Ally? — Beijing Review

    www.bjreview.com.cn/world/txt/2015-06/15/content_692433.htm

     As a result, only Japan has taken a negative attitude toward the AIIB, which has been used as an evidence by Abe to illustrate that JAPAN IS THE CLOSEST ALLY OF THE UNITED STATES.

    ———————————————

    AND OBAMA has his new best friend, Cuba, and the World Bank.

     ——————————————————

    Hillary has  the Bilderberg, European “World Bank” $$$ backing her for president, her experience as a failed Secretary of State, and her WikiLeaks lies, the Clinton’s Pay and Play…

    ———————————————————-

    We the People of United States of America haven’t  got a single powerful ally left in the world.

    Obama and Hilary have left us with military alliances. period.

    —————————————————————————-

     DESTROYED ALL TRUST?  HOW COULD THE REVELATIONS OF A MAMMOTH GLOBAL DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM,  BY THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE OF UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND. — ON PREVIOUSLY UNHEARD OF SCALE?

    ————————————————————————

    WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange said:

     “Today’s publication further demonstrates that the United States’ economic espionage campaign extends to Germany and to key European institutions and issues such as the European Central Bank and the crisis in Greece. Our publication today also shows how the UK is assisting the US to spy on issues central to Europe. Would France and Germany have proceeded with the BRICS bailout plan for Greece if this intelligence was not collected and passed to the United States – who must have been horrified at the geopolitical implications?”

    ————————————————————————————–

    BRICS bank launched in China as alternative to World Bank, IMF …

    Jul 21, 2015 timesofindia.indiatimes.com › Business

    The BRICS BANK,  BRAZIL, RUSSIA, INDIA, CHINA AND SOUTH AFRICA

    ———————————————————————————

    Greece and the BRICS Bank, a Forgotten Scenario? – Red (Team …

    https://www.redanalysis.org/2015/06/…/greece-and-the-brics-bank-a-forgotten-scenari…

    Jun 30, 2015 – Greece, the first country also bailed out by the new BRICS bank and fund? … This scenario obviously assumes that such bailouts will be part of the … has no aggressive plans, will always prefer political settlement’ – Putin“, RT, …

    Indeed, none of the BRICS have an interest in a collapse of the Euro, as their aim is to favour a truly multipolar world (e.g. “‘BRICS key to multipolar world’- Putin“, The BRICS Post, 22 March 2013). Their interest is more likely to put an end of a U.S.-led unipolar world and thus to the supremacy of the U.S. Dollar, upheld by the Washington consensus, as we have followed here (see “Of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Petrodollars“, 16 April 2015;  “Risks on the USD supremacy“, 27 March 2014, etc.).

    “BRICS members advocate the creation of a more balanced and just system of global economic relations. The emerging markets are interested in long-term sustainable economic growth worldwide and reforms of the financial and economic architecture to make it more efficient,” the president said.

    RUSSIA, PUTIN ASSERTED, IS THE INITIATOR OF THE BRICS FORMAT AND CHAIR AT ITS FIRST SUMMIT IN YEKATERINBURG IN 2009.

    The Russian president approved the Concept of the Russian Federation’s Participation in the BRICS group yesterday.

    BRICS will lay down joint approaches to international crises, said Putin.

    “For the Durban summit, we are working on a joint declaration setting forth our fundamental approaches to pressing international issues, i.e. crisis in Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and the Middle East,” he said.

    Putin also denied a possible face-off with Western nations by saying, “We do not view BRICS as a geopolitical competitor to western countries or their organisations.”

    ONE THING LEADS TO ANOTHER…

    Greece sells country’s largest port to China | The BRICS Post

    thebricspost.com/greece-sells-countrys-largest-port-to-china/

    Apr 9, 2016 – China has described a deal to sell Greece’s biggest port to Chinese … at the port which it plans to turn into a logistics hub for Chinese exports to Europe. … held talks in Brussels on Friday on the country’s key bailout review.

    ——————————————————————–

    The bottom Line

    Oct. 24, 2016 It’s not the American People against the world…

    It’s the world against Obama and Hillary’s  public and private foreign policy and Political agenda.


  • Lankford Letter The Judgment Fund to Iran

    Sept 16, 2016 Lankford Letter The Judgment Fund to Iran

    Who knew? I’d never heard of “The Judgment Fund” until I read the Lankford Letter.

    HOW DOES THE JUDGMENT FUND OPERATE TODAY?

    BY DEFINITION, IT REQUIRES NO FURTHER CONGRESSIONAL ACTION AND DOES NOT EXPIRE AT THE CLOSE OF ANY FISCAL YEAR.

    THE APPROPRIATION MAKES AN “UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF FUNDS” AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    NEGOTIATED AND AGREED TO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

    ————————————————

    From: Sen. James Lankford

    To: phew@wavecable.com

    Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 8:49 AM

    Subject: Lankford Letter

    Tax money to the Iranian military

    snippet

    This is a bigger issue than a single payment, no matter how large. The cash money sent to Iran changes our historic foreign policy of isolating Iran as the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world, and it sets a new precedent for sending money to foreign governments from the long-established Judgment Fund. To deal with the long-term precedent, I authored a bill to limit the future use of THE JUDGMENT FUND and make sure no future president can transfer American tax dollars to a nation that sponsors terrorism. 

    Click here to open this e-mail in its own browser window   Click here to open a plain text version of this email

    —————————————————————–

    JUL 14, 2016  RE: THE JUDGMENT FUND (click on the link)

    Senators Fischer and Lankford Introduce Bill to Expose Taxpayer Funds Transferred to Iran

    ————————————————————-

    After spending nearly five  hours, researching, reading and documenting

    A 19 PAGE DOCUMENT BY CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE

    The Judgment Fund (or Fund) is a permanent appropriation enacted by Congress in 1956. The Fund is an unlimited amount of money set aside to pay judgments against the United States.

    The Judgment Fund: History, Administration, and Common Usage

    https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42835.pdf

    Federation of American Scientists Mar 7, 2013 – In the 113th Congress, the Judgment Fund Transparency Act of 2013 ( …. The U.S. government has sovereign immunity, meaning it cannot be …

    HOW DOES THE JUDGMENT FUND OPERATE TODAY?

    BY DEFINITION, IT REQUIRES NO FURTHER CONGRESSIONAL ACTION AND DOES NOT EXPIRE AT THE CLOSE OF ANY FISCAL YEAR.

    THE APPROPRIATION MAKES AN “UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF FUNDS” AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    NEGOTIATED AND AGREED TO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

    PAY FOR JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES FROM STATE AND FOREIGN TRIBUNALS SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

     IT IS ONLY ACCESSIBLE WHEN THE UNITED STATES HAS WAIVED ITS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

    —————————————————————————-

    JUL 14, 2016  RE: THE JUDGMENT FUND (click on the link)

    Senators Fischer and Lankford Introduce Bill to Expose Taxpayer Funds Transferred to Iran

    Legislation Will Allow Americans to Track Payments to Foreign Nations

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – This morning, U.S. Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) introduced legislation to track taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations and prevent harmful transactions from happening in the future. The bill, known as the

    JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY AND TERRORISM FINANCING PREVENTION ACT,

     expands upon legislation that Senator Fischer introduced last year with Senator Cory Gardner (R-Colo.). It would require a public accounting of the taxpayer funds that are distributed out of the Judgment Fund.

    Senator Fischer released the following statement:

    “Hardworking American families have every right to see exactly how their tax dollars are being spent, especially when used to fund hostile enemies of the United States. That is why I’m proud to join Senator Lankford to offer a new version of the Judgment Fund Transparency Act, which includes greater oversight of taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations. More transparency leads to greater accountability and through this bill, we can hold our government to task for their actions. We should not be in the business of providing funds to state sponsors of terrorism.”

    Senator Lankford released the following statement:

    “One year after the Iran Nuclear agreement, we still have the same concerns with Iran as before. Their secrecy is disconcerting and they continue to be spread terrorism and a radical Islamist ideology around the region. President Obama’s billion-dollar payment to Iran in January, which we now know is funding Iran’s military expansion, is an appalling example of Executive Branch governance.

    “The bill Senator Fischer and I have introduced will provide the American public with necessary details of this dangerous billion-dollar payment and ensure that no taxpayer dollars are ever again used to fund the extremist and violent ambitions of rogue nations like Iran.  Subsidizing Iran’s military is perhaps the worst use of taxpayer dollars ever by an American president.”

    —————————————————————————————-

    Hague Claims Tribunal Settlement – US Department of State

    www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2016/…/251338.ht…

    United States Department of State Jan 17, 2016 – The United States and Iran today have settled a long outstanding claim at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in the Hague. This specific claim was in …

    IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLOSED $400 MILLION CASH HAGUE SETTLEMENT WITH IRAN,

    UPDATED ON SEP 7, 2016 TO $1.7 BILLION IN CASH HAGUE SETTLEMENT WITH IRAN

    US made $1.7 billion transfer to Iran in foreign cash, Treasury says …

    www.foxnews.com/…/us-made-1-7-billion-transfer-to-iran-in-foreign…

    Fox News Channel Sep 7, 2016 – A Treasury spokeswoman told the Associated Press the cash payments …. @cntstdthepain – Iran was seeking $10 billion in today’s dollars.

    ———————————————————————–

    YEP…. AND, IN ADDITION TO THAT

    WE HAVE “U.S. FOREIGN AID FUNDING” FOR HUMANITARIAN AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE.

    “Hardworking American families have every right to see exactly how their tax dollars are being spent, especially when used to fund hostile enemies of the United States.

    WHO IS GOING TO. INTRODUCED LEGISLATION TO TRACK DANGEROUS BILLION-DOLLAR  TAXPAYER-FUNDED FOREIGN AID PAYMENTS TO FOREIGN NATIONS AND PREVENT HARMFUL U.S. FOREIGN AID FUNDING OF HUMANITARIAN AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE FROM ENDING UP IN THE HANDS OF STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM.

     That is why I’m proud to join (PRESIDENT TRUMP)  to offer a new version of the

     FOREIGN AID FUND TRANSPARENCY AND TERRORISM FINANCING PREVENTION ACT  

    which includes greater oversight of taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations. More transparency leads to greater accountability and through this bill, we can hold our government to task for their actions. We should not be in the business of providing funds to state sponsors of terrorism.”

    ——————————————————————————

    HOW DOES THE FOREIGN AID FUNDING OPERATE TODAY?

     U.S. FOREIGN (AID) RELATIONS AND AFFAIRS, SENATE AND HOUSE FUNDING FOREIGN AID PROGRAMS AS WELL AS FUNDING ARMS SALES AND TRAINING FOR NATIONAL ALLIES?.

     THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS is a standing committee of the … THE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE IS GENERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING (BUT NOT ADMINISTERING) and funding foreign aid programs as well as funding arms sales and training for national allies.

     GENERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING?

    ————————————————————————

    THE U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS is a standing committee of the …has jurisdiction over BILLS AND INVESTIGATIONS related to the foreign affairs of the United States.

     BILLS AND INVESTIGATIONS?

    —————————————————————-

     INVESTIGATION ON WHO DELIVERS?

    Delivery of Foreign Assistance

    What Executive Branch Agencies Implement Foreign Aid

    Programs?

    U.S. Agency for International Development

    U.S. Department of Defense

    U.S. Department of State

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    U.S. Department of the Treasury

    MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

    ——————————————————

    The Millennium Challenge Account

    http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/developingnations/millennium.html

    This is historical material, “frozen in time.” The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.

    March 14, 2002 “Today, I call for a new compact for global development, defined by new ACCOUNTABILITY for both rich and poor nations alike,” STATES PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS ADDRESS AT THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK IN WASHINGTON, D.C. MARCH 14, 2002. Accompanying the President: the lead singer of U2, Bono; Cardinal McCarrick and WORLDBANK PRESIDENT JIM WOLFENSOHN.

    —————————————————————

    INVESTIGATION ON WHO DELIVERS?

    WHO ENSURES ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MEASURABLE RESULTS?

    MCC IS AN INDEPENDENT U.S. GOVERNMENT FOREIGN AID AGENCY

    PROVIDES ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE THROUGH A COMPETITIVE SELECTION PROCESS TO DEVELOPING NATIONS …

    ADMINISTRATION  THE MCA WILL BE ADMINISTERED BY A NEW GOVERNMENT CORPORATION DESIGNED TO SUPPORT INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES

    AND TO ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MEASURABLE RESULTS.

    THE CORPORATION WILL BE SUPERVISED BY A BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPOSED OF CABINET LEVEL OFFICIALS.

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE WILL BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. (JOHN KERRY)

    THE CEO OF THE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION WILL BE NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT (OBAMA) AND CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE.

    The following 16 indicators (WITH SOURCES), CHOSEN because of the relative quality and objectivity of their data, country coverage, public availability, and correlation with growth and poverty reduction, WILL BE USED TO ASSESS NATIONAL PERFORMANCE RELATIVE TO GOVERNING JUSTLY, INVESTING IN PEOPLE, and encouraging economic freedom.

    GOVERNING JUSTLY:

    CIVIL LIBERTIES (FREEDOM HOUSE)

    POLITICAL RIGHTS (FREEDOM HOUSE)

    VOICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    RULE OF LAW (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    CONTROL OF CORRUPTION (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    Investing in People:

    Public Primary Education Spending as Percent of GDP (World Bank/national sources)

    Primary Education Completion Rate (World Bank/national sources)

    Public Expenditures on Health as Percent of GDP (World Bank/national sources)

    Immunization Rates: DPT and Measles (World Bank/UN/national sources)

    ————————————————————————-

    Just asking is MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION an independent regulatory agency, as defined below?

    UNLIKE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES, independent regulatory agencies are not subject to basic analytical requirements. BECAUSE OF THIS, INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES DO NOT CONDUCT RIGOROUS COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OR CUMULATIVE EFFECT EVALUATION.

    And? Other agencies?

    ——————————————————-

    What Are the Different Forms in Which Assistance Is Provided?

    Cash Transfers

    Equipment and Commodities

    Economic Infrastructure

    Training

    Expertise

    Small Grants

    ———————————————————————————–

    The Judgment Fund, which is administered by the Treasury Department, is used to pay for certain court judgments and settlements against the federal government. Between 2013 and 2015, the federal government paid more than $10 billion in Judgment Fund awards with scant transparency or oversight.

    This fund has continued to come under increased scrutiny, as it is allowed to allocate unlimited funds to cover government liability in lawsuits and is not subject to the annual appropriations process. The Judgement Fund Transparency Act would provide hardworking taxpayers and members of Congress the ability to see exactly how tax dollars are being spent on these litigation expenses.

    In February of 2015, The Washington Examiner published an editorial praising Senator Fischer’s bill:

    “Senators Cory Gardner, R-Colo., and Deb Fischer, R-Neb., are co-sponsoring a bill that would fix this problem and bring transparency to the Judgment Fund, the treasury account that pays judgments and settlements to plaintiffs. The Judgment Fund Transparency Act is just two pages long. It simply requires the Treasury Department to make public through its website the details of every payment the fund makes… The bill deserves broad bipartisan support. For anyone who believes in government transparency, it’s a no-brainer.”

    Click here to view text of the bill.

    Permalink: http://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2016/7/senators-fischer-and-lankford-introduce-bill-to-expose-taxpayer-funds-transferred-to-iran


  • President Bush’s New World Order 1990

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S 911 VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT HE SHARED…….

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE:

    A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR

    A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

    ——————————————————————————————

    Sept 13, 2016 THANK GOD, DONALD J. TRUMP  HAS A DIFFERENT VISION FOR AMERICA, AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES  DONALD J. TRUMP SHALL MAKE “AMERICA FIRST”

    ——————————————————————————

    PROMPTED BY THE IRAQI INVASION OF KUWAIT.PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH SAID,

    “IT WAS THEN THAT “I”  DECIDED TO ACT TO CHECK THAT AGGRESSION.”

    —————————————————

    WHO IN THE WORLD SHALL BE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST, THE MASS KILLING, MASS MIGRATION, MASS IMMIGRATION, AND THE IRREPARABLE MASS DESTRUCTION CAUSED BY OVER 15 YEARS OF CONFLICTS AND WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    I THINK NOT!

    YOU READ THIS YOU DECIDE

    ——————————————————————

    One constant for the UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL since 1980 is that it has been at grips with conflicts involving Iraq – conflicts with Iraq’s neighbours and also internal strife prior to and particularly since 2003. Every instrument at the Council’s disposal, including all the coercive ones, have been invoked at one time or another against authorities in Iraq or to assist them.

    ALL OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS TO A DEGREE PROVIDED GRIST FOR

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    ————————————————————————————

    TRUTH  AND CONSEQUENCES

    (1)  THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL IRAQ SANCTIONS

    (2)  DESTABILIZED THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST?

    (3) PROVOKING THE 911 2001 ATTACK ON NEW YORK CITY?

    (4)   VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS?

    This Address was given on 911, 1990 exactly 11 years before the 911 attack on the Twin Towers in New York City.

    ———————————————————————————-

    President George H. W. Bush’s  New World Order Address

    full text? click on the link

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    Washington’s stance did little to induce Saddam Hussein to  cooperate with UNSCOM.

    Even prior to this, the sanctions proved critically ill-suited over time to induce compliance with the UN’s wider demands articulated in Resolution 687, as the Saddam Hussein

    regime itself suffered little from the effect of sanctions. Worse still, the sanctions created the potential for a lucrative black market largely controlled by and benefiting those in power in Baghdad

    while the Iraqi population suffered ‘near-apocalyptic’ humanitarian consequences.  After the programme began, an estimated 50,000 Iraqi children under the age of five died as a result of the sanctions and child mortality rates more than doubled. Some even compared the sanctions regime itself to a weapon of mass destruction.

    Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the “most widely accepted ethical frameworks” in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that “primary responsibility rests with the UNSC [United Nations Security Council]” under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral Kantianism, and consequentialism.

    —————————————————————————–

    KANTIANISM IS DEFINED AS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY THAT FOLLOWS THE WORKS OF IMMANUEL KANT WHO BELIEVED THAT RATIONAL BEINGS HAVE DIGNITY AND SHOULD BE RESPECTED.

    A PHILOSOPHY OF RATIONAL MORALITY INCLUDING GOD AND FREEDOM

    CONSEQUENTIALISM IS THE CLASS OF NORMATIVE ETHICAL THEORIES HOLDING THAT THE CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S CONDUCT ARE THE ULTIMATE BASIS FOR ANY JUDGMENT ABOUT THE RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS OF THAT CONDUCT. IT IS THE DOCTRINE

    THAT THE MORALITY OF AN ACTION IS TO BE JUDGED SOLELY BY ITS CONSEQUENCES.

     —————————————————————————

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENCES, CULPABILITY AND CONSEQUENTIALISM

    (1)  THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL

    (2) IRAQ SANCTIONS DESTABILIZED THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST?

    (3) PROVOKED THE 911 2001 ATTACK ON NEW YORK CITY?

    (4)   VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS?

    Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the “most widely accepted ethical frameworks” in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that,

     INDEED….

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral KANTIANISM, and CONSEQUENTIALISM.

    ————————————————————————————

    WE CAN NOW POINT TO  THE TRUTH AND CONSEQUENCES OF   PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH’S  “NEW WORLD ORDER” ADDRESS,

    THE CRISIS IN THE PERSIAN GULF, THE RESPONSIBILITY AND CULPABILITY OF PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH.

    CONSEQUENTIALISM?  You decide

    THE CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S CONDUCT ARE THE ULTIMATE BASIS FOR ANY JUDGMENT ABOUT THE RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS OF THAT CONDUCT. IT IS THE DOCTRINE THAT THE MORALITY OF AN ACTION IS TO BE JUDGED SOLELY BY ITS CONSEQUENCES.

    —————————————————————————————-

    TRUTH  AND CONSEQUENCES? INCLUDING GOD AND FREEDOM

    The United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq following that country’s invasion of Kuwait.

    Resolutions 661 and 687 expressed the goals of eliminating weapons of mass destruction and extended-range ballistic missiles, prohibiting any support for terrorism, and forcing Iraq to pay war reparations and all foreign debt.

    ——————————————————————–

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENCES, CULPABILITY AND CONSEQUENTIALISM 

    The UN Security Council and Iraq – UNU Collections – United Nations …

    https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:5/wp01_theunscandiraq1.pdf

    by D Malone – ‎2013 –

    ———————————————————————————–

    HERE ARE THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS ANTI-AMERICAN SNIPPETS FROM

    PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH’S  NEW WORLD ORDER ADDRESS

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT HE SHARED…….

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE: A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR

    A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

    We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective……

    —————————————————————————————-

    I AM COMPELLED… Just asking….

    THE REAL CRISIS IN THE PERSIAN GULF?

    Just saying …..

    THE PERSIAN GULF AND ITS COASTAL AREAS ARE THE WORLD’S LARGEST SINGLE SOURCE OF CRUDE OIL.

    ———————————————————————————-

    fifth objective continued……

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE: A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR,

    stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. AN ERA IN WHICH THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.

    A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor.

    Today that new world is struggling to be born,

     A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

     A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak.

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT I SHARED with President Gorbachev in Helsinki.

     HE AND OTHER LEADERS FROM EUROPE, THE GULF, AND AROUND THE WORLD UNDERSTAND

    THAT HOW WE MANAGE THIS CRISIS TODAY COULD SHAPE THE FUTURE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.

    ——————————————————————-

    A NEW PARTNERSHIP OF NATIONS HAS BEGUN.

    These goals are not ours alone. THEY’VE BEEN ENDORSED BY THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL FIVE TIMES IN AS MANY WEEKS.

     Most countries share our concern for principle. AND MANY HAVE A STAKE IN THE STABILITY OF THE PERSIAN GULF.

    This is not, as Saddam Hussein would have it, the United States against Iraq. It is Iraq against the world.

    VITAL ECONOMIC INTERESTS ARE AT RISK AS WELL.

    IRAQ ITSELF CONTROLS SOME 10 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S PROVEN OIL RESERVES.

     IRAQ PLUS KUWAIT CONTROLS TWICE THAT.

     AN IRAQ PERMITTED TO SWALLOW KUWAIT WOULD HAVE THE ECONOMIC AND MILITARY POWER, AS WELL AS THE ARROGANCE, TO INTIMIDATE AND COERCE ITS NEIGHBORS—

    NEIGHBORS WHO CONTROL THE LION’S SHARE OF THE WORLD’S REMAINING OIL RESERVES.

    WE CANNOT PERMIT A RESOURCE SO VITAL TO BE DOMINATED BY ONE SO RUTHLESS

    One way or another, the leader of Iraq must learn this fundamental truth. From the outset, acting hand in hand with others, we’ve sought to fashion the broadest possible international response to Iraq’s aggression.

    THE LEVEL OF WORLD COOPERATION AND CONDEMNATION OF IRAQ IS UNPRECEDENTED.

    ARMED FORCES FROM COUNTRIES SPANNING FOUR CONTINENTS ARE THERE AT THE REQUEST OF KING FAHD OF SAUDI ARABIA TO DETER AND, IF NEED BE, TO DEFEND AGAINST ATTACK.

     MOSLEMS AND NON-MOSLEMS, ARABS AND NON-ARABS, SOLDIERS FROM MANY NATIONS STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER, RESOLUTE AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN’S AMBITIONS.

    WE CAN NOW POINT TO FIVE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS THAT CONDEMN IRAQ’S AGGRESSION.

    ————————————————————————————-

    The UN Security Council and Iraq – UNU Collections – United Nations …

    https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:5/wp01_theunscandiraq1.pdf

    by D Malone – ‎2013 –

    Finally, the United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission

    (UNIKOM) was established by Resolution 689 in April 1991. Once again, signaling a new a post-cold war vigour, the Council empowered UNIKOM with duties under a Chapter

    VII mandate, implying coercive powers if necessary.

    ALL OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS TO A DEGREE PROVIDED GRIST FOR

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    OUTLINED IN A SPEECH TO A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 1990 PROMPTED BY THE IRAQI INVASION OF KUWAIT.

    WASHINGTON’S STANCE DID LITTLE TO INDUCE SADDAM HUSSEIN TO  COOPERATE WITH UNSCOM.

     Even prior to this, the sanctions proved critically ill-suited over time to induce compliance with the UN’s wider demands articulated in Resolution 687, as the Saddam Hussein

    regime itself suffered little from the effect of sanctions. Worse still, the sanctions created the potential for a lucrative black market largely controlled by and benefiting those in power in Baghdad while

    THE IRAQI POPULATION SUFFERED ‘NEAR-APOCALYPTIC’ HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES.

     AFTER THE PROGRAMME BEGAN, AN ESTIMATED 50,000 IRAQI CHILDREN UNDER

    THE AGE OF FIVE DIED AS A RESULT OF THE SANCTIONS AND CHILD MORTALITY RATES MORE THAN DOUBLED. SOME EVEN COMPARED THE SANCTIONS REGIME ITSELF TO A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION

    ————————————————————————-

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENTIALISM AND CULPABILITY OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL IRAQ SANCTIONS

    WHO IN THE WORLD SHALL BE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST, THE MASS KILLING, MASS MIGRATION, MASS IMMIGRATION, AND THE IRREPAIRABLE MASS DESTRUCTION CAUSED BY OVER 15 YEARS OF CONFLICTS AND WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    I THINK NOT!


  • America’s Prefabricated Government

    America’s Prefabricated Government

    Trump calls it rigged… I agree with Trump

    We the people have a totally  dysfunctional divided  U.S. Congress, the newly elected are lead down the rose garden path by self serving, long time, establishment  career politicians, on both sides of the isle, with  a total of 535 Members of Congress. 100 serve in the U.S. Senate and 435 serve in the U.S. House of Representatives.

    Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo Put ’em  together and what have you got?

    Politically Correct?

    As documented on C-SPAN Congressmen’s  videotaped  speeches

    Gibberish or Jibberish and gobbledygook refer to speech or other use of language that is nonsense, or that appears to be nonsense. It may include speech sounds that are not actual words, or forms such as language games or highly specialized jargon that seems non-sensical to outsiders.

    Donald J. Trump and Ben Carson are outsiders

    ————————————————————–

    Is  Politically Correct speaking in Congress just  a Globalization MANTRA?

    The earliest mantras are at least 3000 years old.

    IN MORE SOPHISTICATED FORMS, MANTRAS ARE MELODIC PHRASES WITH SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATIONS SUCH AS A HUMAN LONGING FOR TRUTH, REALITY, LIGHT, IMMORTALITY, PEACE, LOVE, KNOWLEDGE, AND ACTION.

    Oops…. INSIDER, Hillary’s Politically Correct  Globalization MANTRA?

    THE DEMOCRATS, POLITICALLY CORRECT,  MELODIC Globalization PHRASES WITH SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATIONS OF PEACE AND LOVE,  will find a way?

    ————————————————————————————

    OUTSIDER, DONALD J. TRUMP POLITICALLY  INCORRECT  AMERICANIZATION  MANTRA?

    IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION TRUMP HAS A MORE SOPHISTICATED AMERICANIZATION PLATFORM SUCH AS A HUMAN (VOTERS) LONGING FOR TRUTH, REALITY, KNOWLEDGE, AND ACTION.

    ———————————————————————————–

    LET’S DO A FACT CHECK  ON LYING’ HILLARY’S  TRUTH, REALITY,  AND ACTION.

    INCLUDING, THE TOTALITY OF A LYING’ HILLARY’S 30 YEARS OF POLITICAL ACTIONS INCLUDING LYING’ HILLARY’S CONDUCT DURING SUCCESSIVE ACTIONS IN BENGHAZI , AND LYING’ HILLARY’S  PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, SEEN AS BRINGING UPON LYING’ HILLARY’S INEVITABLE RESULTS, GOOD OR BAD,

    LYING’ UNSOPHISTICATED HILLARY GOT AWAY WITH ALL OF IT

     INDEED THE SUM OF A HILLARY’S ACTIONS IN THIS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE WITH TRUMP AND HILLARY’S PREVIOUS ACTIONS AS THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SHOULD BE VIEWED AS DECIDING LYING’ HILLARY’S  FATE IN FUTURE EXISTENCE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

    SOUNDS LIKE HILLARY’S GOT KARMA?

    ————————————————————————-

    WOW, a  US Congressman actually wrote a thing called HOW CONGRESS WORKS?

    ———————————————————————————-

    Many a Truth about HOW CONGRESS WORKS is spoken in Jest… You decide…

    “I have wondered at times what the Ten Commandments would have looked like if Moses had run them through the US Congress.” — Ronald Reagan

    “Can any of you seriously say the Bill of Rights could get through Congress today? It wouldn’t even get out of committee.”

    “I don’t know what’s wrong with my television set. I was getting C-Span and the Home Shopping Network on the same station. I actually bought a Congress man.”

    “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”

    ” Congress is so strange. A man gets up to speak and says nothing. Nobody listens—and then everybody disagrees.”

    ” Congress consists of one third, more or less, scoundrels; two thirds, more or less, idiots; and three thirds, more or less, poltroons.” (by definition poltroons are utter cowards)

    “The only difference between death and taxes is that death doesn’t get worse every time Congress meets.”

    “Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.”

    Mark Twain: “I was very particular about the kind of job I wanted. I didn’t want to work. So I went over to the Congress, that Grand Old Benevolent National Asylum for the Helpless, and I reported on the inmates there.”

    “Of course, the truth is that the Congress persons are too busy raising campaign money to read the laws they pass. The laws are written by staff tax nerds who can put pretty much any wording they want in there. I bet that if you actually read the entire vastness of the US tax code, you’d find at least one sex scene. (“Yes, yes, YES!” (some content deleted as  too explicit)  moaned, again and again depreciated her adjusted gross rate of annualized fiscal debenture…)”

    Many a true word is spoken in jest – meaning and origin.

    www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/many-a-true-word.html

    Many a true word is spoken in jest. Meaning. A literal meaning; that the truth is often found in comic utterances. Origin. The first author to express this thought in …

    ——————————————————————————–

    IF HILLARY IS ELECTED WHAT’S NEXT? WHO’S NEXT?  FOR AMERICA’S SUPREME COURT JUSTICES?

    In case you missed it…. THIS IS DOCUMENT TRUTH

    IN CANADA’S NEW PROCESS, THE PRIME MINISTER, ONE MAN,  SHALL HAVE TOTAL POWER TO APPOINT THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA JUSTICES.

    Prime Minister announces new Supreme Court of Canada judicial …

    pm.gc.ca/…/news/…/prime-minister-announces-newsuprem

    Prime Minister of Canada

    2 days ago – Today, the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, announced a new process for appointing Supreme Court of Canada Justices that is open, transparent, and sets a higher standard for accountability. … The seven-member Advisory Board, chaired by former Prime Minister Kim Campbell, includes …


  • C-SPAN Watch Mica’s Questions for Comey

    C-SPAN  Watch Rep. Mica’s Questions for Comey

    The rapid fire timeline…..

    Another chapter in the Book of Revelations by Pearl Revere

    FBI Director James Comey Testifies Hillary | Video

    C-Span‎ – 2 days ago

    Hillary Clinton Email Investigation, Part 1 FBI Director James Comey testified at a hearing on … length  04:38:10

    Inspectors general from the State Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) testified at a hearing on Hillary Clinton’s use of private email servers…

    O1:19:45

    July 7, 2016

    Forward to 02:12:59 in the video  for Rep. John Mica’s questions

    ———————————————————————

    A SNIPPET OF BIASED CBS News…..  SELECTIVE REPORTING

    www.cbsnews.com/news/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email/

    12:19 p.m. In another tangential exchange, Rep. John Mica, R-Florida, questions whether Comey has seen the popular Broadway musical, Hamilton.

    “Have you seen the Broadway production Hamilton?” Mica asked.

    Comey replied: “Not yet. I’m hoping to.”

    Republican Rep. John Mica of Florida said the timing of Comey’s announcement was suspicious and compared the decisions “choreography” to the Broadway musical, “Hamilton.”

    The decision came just a week after former President Bill Clinton met privately with Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a few days after Clinton testified for 3 1/2 hours to the FBI.

    Clinton campaigned with President Barack Obama a few hours after Comey’s announcement.

    Mica said, “This is rapid fire. My folks have questions.”

    Mica said he was “not a conspiracy theorist,” but the timing raises questions.

    —————————————————————————————–

    WATCH THE VIDEO FOR THE REST OF THE STORY..

    FBI Director James Comey Testifies Hillary | Video

    C-Span‎ – 2 days ago

    Hillary Clinton Email Investigation, Part 1 FBI Director James Comey testified at a hearing on …

    ———————————————————————

    Forward to 02:12:59 in the video  for Rep. John Mica’s questions, comments and requests

    What questions and comments from Rep. John Mica are missing from the media report in the five minutes between 12:19 p.m.ET  and 12:26 p.m. ET

    FBI Director James Comey did not attend the FBI’S  3½ hour interview Hillary Clinton on Saturday morning.

    Five or six unnamed FBI agents conducted the interview

    FBI Director James Comey did not speak directly with the five or six unnamed FBI agents

    FBI Director James Comey said the decision to not charge Hillary Clinton was unanimous.

    FBI Director James Comey says no one influenced his decision in any way.

    Hillary Clinton was not under oath for FBI 3½ hours interview

    The 3½ hours  FBI interview with Hillary Clinton was NOT recorded

    A 302 analysis of the 3½ hours  FBI interview, was written by the Five or six unnamed FBI agents.

    Did FBI Director James Comey read the 302 analysis of the 3½ hours  FBI interview

    FBI Director James Comey did not bring a copy of the 302 analysis of the 3½ hours  FBI interview to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee  for the Hillary Clinton Email Investigation

    Rep. John Mica requested a copy of the FBI 302 analysis of the 3½ hours,  FBI interview with Hillary Clinton, from FBI Director James Comey.

    ————————————————————————————

    12:26 p.m. Comey  gave a testy response over insinuations that he coordinated with Democrats on his recommendations and the timing of the FBI press conference.

    “I did not coordinate that with anyone,” he insisted. “I say that under oath, I stand by that.”

    —————————————————————————

    What questions and comments are missing from the media report? In the seven minutes between 12:26 p.m. ET and 12:33 p.m ET

    12:33 p.m. FBI Director James Comey is emphatically denying that he coordinates his decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton with the White House or anyone else.

    ——————————————————————–

    Rep. John Mica’s, The congressman told Comey that “my folks at home think there is something fishy about this,”

    “My folks have questions.”

    How many questions were sent to GOP members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee  regarding the Hillary Clinton Email Investigation? one member said he had received 500 and another said 750?

    —————————————————————–

    Rep. John Mica’s said “The timing raises questions”

    —————————————————————————

    TIMING? WHAT TIMING? Date July 5, 2016. …

    WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, on Tuesday recommended no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her handling of classified information while she was secretary of state, lifting an enormous legal cloud from her presidential campaign LESS THAN TWO HOURS BEFORE SHE BOARDED Air Force One FOR HER FIRST JOINT CAMPAIGN APPEARANCE WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA.

    ————————————————————————————

    THIS IS THE TIME LINE

    WATCH THE C-SPAN VIDEOS

    Part 1 is over four hours

    Part 2 is one hour and 45 minutes

    THE TIMELINE IS SIX (6) DAYS

    How many questions do you have?

    HSE Oversight – FBI Probe/Private Email

     

    Jun 30, 2016

    Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton meeting raises eyebrows – USA Today

    www.usatoday.com/story/news/…lynch-bill-clintonmeeting/86555274/

    USA Today

    Jun 30, 2016Lynch, who will ultimately determine the outcome of an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email server while secretary of …

    ———————————————————————————————

    July 1, 2016  7:21 am

    Reporter: FBI ordered ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones’ during …

    hotair.com/…/2016/…/reporter-fbi-ordered-no-photos-no-pictures-no-cell-pho…

    Hot Air

    posted at 7:21 am on July 1, 2016 by Larry O’Connor … involving that secret meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    July 1, 2016

    Loretta Lynch to Accept FBI Recommendations in Clinton Email Inquiry

    www.nytimes.com/2016/…/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-serv…

    The New York Times

    Jul 1, 2016 – By REUTERS on Publish Date July 1, 2016. Photo by … Bill Clinton’s Meeting With Loretta Lynch Causes Stir in Both Parties JULY 1, 2016 …

    ———————————————————————————

    SAT JULY  2, 2016

    FBI interviews Hillary Clinton for more than 3 hours in email probe …

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/fbiinterviewsclinton…/2016/…

    The Washington Post

    6 days ago – FBI agents interviewed Hillary Clinton for 3½ hours Saturday morning — a signal that the investigation into her use of a private email account …

    ————————————————————————————–

    Updated 2:56 PM ET, Sun July 3, 2016

    Hillary Clinton questioned by FBI as part of email probe – CNNPolitics …

    www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/…/clinton-meets-with-fbi-as-part-of-email-probe/

    CNN 5 days ago – … with Bill Clinton · coons lynch clinton meeting cuomo intv newday_00000000.jpg ….

    In the news

    THE QUESTION NOW BECOMES HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE FOR THE FBI TO CONCLUDE ITS PROBE?

    ————————————————————————————-

    July 4th, 2016

    Hillary Clinton speaks out after FBI interview on email server – TODAY …

    www.today.com/…/hillary-clinton-speaks-out-after-fbiinterview-on-email-serv…

    Today

    July 4th, 2016  Hillary Clinton speaks out after FBI interview on email server. Hillary Clinton is gearing up for a big week, preparing to visit several critical …

    ——————————————————————————-

    July 5, 2016

    F.B.I. Director James Comey Recommends No Charges for Hillary …

    www.nytimes.com/2016/07/…/hillary-clintonfbi-email-comey.htm…

    The New York Times 3 days ago – F.B.I. Recommends No Charges for Clinton. The F.B.I. director … By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS on Publish Date July 5, 2016. Photo by Cliff …

    ———————————————————————————

    Date July 5, 2016. … TIMING? WHAT TIMING?

    WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, on Tuesday recommended no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her handling of classified information while she was secretary of state, lifting an enormous legal cloud from her presidential campaign less than two hours before she boarded Air Force One for her first joint campaign appearance with President Obama.

    ————————————————————————-

    July 5, 2016

    Obama Joins Hillary Clinton on Stump, Saying She ‘Has Been Tested …

    www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/…/hillary-clintonobama.html

    The New York Times 3 days ago – By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS on Publish Date July 5, 2016. … Hillary Clinton and President Obama arrived in Charlotte, N.C., on Tuesday via Air Force One. ….

    Republican Rep. John Mica of Florida said the timing of Comey’s announcement was suspicious and compared the decisions “choreography” to the Broadway musical, “Hamilton.”

    ——————————————————————————————–

    Comey sharply rejects idea that FBI coordinated with others on Clinton probe

    By Louis Nelson

    07/07/16 12:54 PM EDT

    FBI Director James Comey took umbrage at a line of questioning from Rep. John Mica on Thursday amid a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on the bureau’s recommendation not to press charges against Hillary Clinton.

    Mica (R-Fla.) kicked off his questions to Comey by telling the FBI director that he would have to explain the bureau’s decision to constituents at cafes he frequents in his home district. The congressman told Comey that “my folks at home think there is something fishy about this,” implying the possibility of some conspiracy among the Justice Department, FBI and the Clinton campaign to protect the presumptive Democratic nominee from indictment.

    At the conclusion of Mica’s questioning, Comey asked committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) whether he could address the Florida congressman’s concerns directly.

    “I hope what you’ll tell the folks in the cafe is, look me in the eye and listen to what I’m about to say,” Comey said to Mica at the conclusion of the congressman’s questioning. “I did not coordinate that with anyone. The White House, the Department of Justice, nobody outside the FBI family had any idea what I was about to say. I say that under oath, I stand by that. There was no coordination. There was an insinuation in what you were saying. … I don’t mean to get strong in responding, but I want to make sure I was definitive about that.”
    Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/james-comey-testimony/2016/07/james-comey-no-coordination-clinton-225232#ixzz4Dq3n9slp
    Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

    —————————————————————————

    Recently Added Entries | Clinton Email Investigation Timeline

    www.thompsontimeline.com/recently-added-entries/

    2 days ago – Lynch technically is the head of the FBI’s Clinton investigation, since she’s in … and comes after 15 months of investigation, at a cost of over $7 million. …. is using taxpayer dollars to protect their candidate Hillary Clinton.

    The bottom line….

    Date July 7, 2016. … TIMELINE? WHAT TIMELINE?

    WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, on Tuesday recommended no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her handling of classified information while she was secretary of state, lifting an enormous legal cloud from her presidential campaign less than two hours before she boarded Air Force One for her first joint campaign appearance with President Obama.


  • Just a Matter of Time and Money 1790-2016

    JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND FOREIGN MONEY 1790-2016

    1790 GET FIRST ALL THE PEOPLE’S MONEY, THEN ALL THEIR LANDS AND THEN MAKE THEM AND THEIR CHILDREN SERVANTS FOREVER…BANKING ESTABLISHMENTS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN STANDING ARMIES.  ALREADY THEY HAVE RAISED UP A MONEY ARISTOCRACY.”

    THE ROTHSCHILD-SPONSORED HAMILTON’S ARGUMENTS FOR A PRIVATE US CENTRAL BANK CARRIED THE DAY. 

     IN 1791 THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES (BUS) WAS FOUNDED, WITH THE ROTHSCHILDS AS MAIN OWNERS

    ————————————————————————————-

    “GIVE ME CONTROL OVER A NATION’S CURRENCY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS.”

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

    ——————————————————————–

    1790 THOMAS JEFFERSON ARGUED THAT THE UNITED STATES NEEDED A PUBLICLY-OWNED CENTRAL BANK SO THAT “EUROPEAN MONARCHS” AND ARISTOCRATS COULD NOT USE THE PRINTING OF MONEY TO CONTROL THE AFFAIRS OF THE NEW NATION.

    JUST A MATTER OF TIME  1790 – APR 29, 2013

    THE MONARCHS OF MONEY

    CBC documentary “The Monarchs of Money” airing on The National …

    www.bankofcanada.ca › Press › Interviews

    Bank of Canada Apr 29, 2013 – monarchmoney-290413. Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of Canada

    —————————————————————————–

    1790 Jefferson extolled:

    “A country which expects to remain ignorant and free…expects that which has never been and that which will never be. There is scarcely a King in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharaoh –

    GET FIRST ALL THE PEOPLE’S MONEY, THEN ALL THEIR LANDS AND THEN MAKE THEM AND THEIR CHILDREN SERVANTS FOREVER…BANKING ESTABLISHMENTS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN STANDING ARMIES.  ALREADY THEY HAVE RAISED UP A MONEY ARISTOCRACY.”

    JEFFERSON WATCHED AS THE EURO-BANKING CONSPIRACY TO CONTROL THE UNITED STATES UNFOLDED, weighing in:

    “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”. [7]

    BUT THE ROTHSCHILD-SPONSORED HAMILTON’S ARGUMENTS FOR A PRIVATE US CENTRAL BANK CARRIED THE DAY.  IN 1791 THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES (BUS) WAS FOUNDED, WITH THE ROTHSCHILDS AS MAIN OWNERS. THE BANK’S CHARTER WAS TO RUN OUT IN 1811.

    Public opinion ran in favor of revoking the charter and replacing it with a Jeffersonian public central bank. The debate was postponed as the nation was plunged by the Euro-bankers into the War of 1812.  Amidst a climate of fear and economic hardship, HAMILTON’S BANK got its charter renewed in 1816.

    ————————————————————————————

    THEORETICAL INTRODUCTION

    “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.”

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

    He, of course, did not think of his discovery in these 20th century terms, and to be sure, mathematical analysis had to wait for the Second Industrial Revolution, the rise of the theory of mechanics and electronics,

    AND FINALLY, THE INVENTION OF THE ELECTRONIC COMPUTER BEFORE IT COULD BE EFFECTIVELY APPLIED IN “THE CONTROL OF THE WORLD ECONOMY”.

    The final key to “ECONOMIC CONTROL” HAD TO WAIT UNTIL THERE WAS SUFFICIENT DATA AND HIGH SPEED COMPUTING EQUIPMENT TO KEEP CLOSE WATCH on the economic oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits …..

    HIGH SPEED COMPUTERS AND SUFFICIENT DATA?

    ———————————————————————————

    POLITICAL INTRODUCTION

    IN 1954 IT WAS WELL RECOGNIZED BY THOSE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY THAT IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME, only a few decades, before the general public would be able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new silent weapon TECHNOLOGY WERE AS ACCESSIBLE FOR A PUBLIC UTOPIA AS THEY WERE FOR PROVIDING A PRIVATE UTOPIA.

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THE GENERAL PUBLIC WOULD BE ABLE TO GRASP AND UPSET THE CRADLE OF POWER

    CBC documentary “The Monarchs of Money” airing on The National …

    www.bankofcanada.ca › Press › Interviews Bank of Canada Apr 29, 2013

    APR 29, 2013

    CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC KNEW THERE WAS THIS ‘CLUB’ THAT MET SECRETLY IN SWITZERLAND AND MADE DECISIONS THAT DRAMATICALLY AFFECTED THEIR LIVES, BUT WE’RE NOT GOING TO TELL YOU ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT’S TOO COMPLICATED.”

    ———————————————————————————————————

    1954 Although the so-called “moral Issues” were raised, in view of the law of natural selection IT WAS AGREED THAT A NATION OR WORLD OF PEOPLE WHO WILL NOT USE THEIR INTELLIGENCE ARE NO BETTER THAN ANIMALS WHO DO NOT HAVE INTELLIGENCE. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

    1954 CONSEQUENTLY, IN THE INTEREST OF FUTURE WORLD ORDER, PEACE, AND TRANQUILITY, IT WAS DECIDED TO PRIVATELY WAGE

    1954 A QUIET WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WITH AN ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE OF PERMANENTLY SHIFTING THE NATURAL AND SOCIAL ENERGY (WEALTH) OF THE UNDISCIPLINED AND IRRESPONSIBLE MANY INTO THE HANDS OF THE SELF-DISCIPLINED, RESPONSIBLE, AND WORTHY FEW.

    ——————————————————————————-

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME HIGH SPEED COMPUTERS AND SUFFICIENT DATA

    The Monarchs Of Money

    THE WORLD’S CENTRAL BANKS have printed unimaginable amounts of money in recent years – “these guys are really more powerful than the government.” Neil Macdonald explores what this means for the global economy and for your financial well-being – CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC KNEW THERE WAS THIS ‘CLUB’ THAT MET SECRETLY IN SWITZERLAND AND MADE DECISIONS THAT DRAMATICALLY AFFECTED THEIR LIVES, BUT WE’RE NOT GOING TO TELL YOU ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT’S TOO COMPLICATED.” This brief documentary should open a few eyes to the reality behind the world’s most powerful (and real) cabal.

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME HIGH SPEED COMPUTERS AND SUFFICIENT DATA

    1790-1954-2015-2016

    The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Rothschild, Rockefeller and Morgan …

    humansarefree.com/2015/06/the-federal-reserve-cartel-rothschild.html

    Jun 25, 2015 – The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control. A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form …

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS A BANK THAT IS PRIVATELY OWNED, AND IS WHERE THE UNITED STATES KEEPS MOST OF ITS MONEY.

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME HIGH SPEED COMPUTERS AND SUFFICIENT DATA

    The bottom line

    INDEED, IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME

    AND FOREIGN MONEY 1790-2016

    1790- 2016 GET FIRST ALL THE PEOPLE’S MONEY, THEN ALL THEIR LANDS AND THEN MAKE THEM AND THEIR CHILDREN SERVANTS FOREVER…BANKING ESTABLISHMENTS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN STANDING ARMIES.  ALREADY THEY HAVE RAISED UP A MONEY ARISTOCRACY.”

    —————————————————

    Read more here 1948-1954

    Behind My Back | Silent Weapons For a Quiet War

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silentweapons-for-a-quietwar/

    Apr 11, 2016 – Silent Weapons For a Quiet War a snippet… DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY Experience has proven that the simplest method of …

     


  • The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    The US Declaration for Complete Disarmament

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE …
    THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

    ————————————
    THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD,
    Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;

    —————–
    Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;

    —————————-
    Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted of man’s material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
    Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:

    —————————————————————–
    (a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required of preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
    (b) the elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
    Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
    (d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    Call on the negotiating states:
    (a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
    (b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
    (c) Also to seek – without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program – agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
    Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
    (a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safe-guarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
    (b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
    (c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
    (d) As stated relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation an common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
    (e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
    Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:
    STAGE I
    A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
    (a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
    (b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
    (c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
    (d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.
    C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    (a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
    (b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
    (c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
    (d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
    (e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
    (f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    (a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfer to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
    (c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.
    E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
    (a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
    (b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle. F. To reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: (a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
    (b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    (c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
    (d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations of the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.
    G. To Keep the Peace:
    (a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force – including nuclear, conventional, or CBR – contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
    (b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    (c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
    (d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
    (e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be despatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STAGE II
    A. International Disarmament Organization:
    The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.
    B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
    (a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
    (b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    (c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
    (d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
    (e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
    C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
    Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.
    D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
    Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.
    E. To Keep the Peace:
    During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the united Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the united Nations:
    (a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the united Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
    (c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.
    STAGE III
    By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force (emphasis added) and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.
    The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
    (a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    (b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    (c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
    (d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    The end of Publication 7277


  • Complete Disarmament Public Law 87-297

    Complete Disarmament Public Law 87-297

    Do you want to know why public officials are voting to take away your firearms?

    Freedom from War (1961)

    dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

    There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the …
    INDEED, THE UNITED STATES INTRODUCED IT
    AT THE SIXTEENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS
    A PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD.

    This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. (The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms.)  (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)

    —————————————————–
    DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    PUBLICATION 7277
    Disarmament Series 5
    Released September 1961
    ———————————————————–
    Title 22 USC 2552
    HERE YOU WILL FIND IT STATED AS ITEM (A) “CONTROL, REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES…” AND AS ITEM (D)” …ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES….”

    ——————–
    WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IS THAT YOUR ARMED FORCES ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND RELINQUISHED FROM NATIONAL CONTROL

    ————————
    WHICH, IN TURN, WIPES OUT OUR SOVEREIGNTY AS A NATION.

    ————————
    IN TWO STAGES, WE WILL HAVE NO MORE ARMY, NO MORE NAVY, NO MORE AIR FORCE.

    ———————————
    IN THE THIRD STAGE, WE SHALL HAVE A “ZERO” MILITARY.

    ————————————
    BEFORE STAGE I CLOSES, ALL CITIZEN OWNED GUNS ARE TO BE BANNED.
    —————————————————————————–
    FREEDOM FROM WAR:

    ‘UNITED STATES CODE BOOKS’ OPEN VOLUME 9.
    TURN TO PAGE 651. HERE YOU WILL FIND PUBLIC LAW 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)
    TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by “disarmament.” THE DISARMAMENT CALLS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF OUR ARMED FORCES. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds.
    (This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a).
    TURN TO PAGE 654.
    HERE YOU WILL FIND IT STATED AS ITEM (A) “CONTROL, REDUCTION AND ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES…” AND AS ITEM (D)” …ELIMINATION OF ARMED FORCES….” WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW IS THAT YOUR ARMED FORCES ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND RELINQUISHED FROM NATIONAL CONTROL WHICH, IN TURN, WIPES OUT OUR SOVEREIGNTY AS A NATION. IN TWO STAGES, WE WILL HAVE NO MORE ARMY, NO MORE NAVY, NO MORE AIR FORCE. IN THE THIRD STAGE,
    WE SHALL HAVE A “ZERO” MILITARY.
    BEFORE STAGE I CLOSES, ALL CITIZEN OWNED GUNS ARE TO BE BANNED.
    —————————————————————————————
    The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World
    DEPARTMENT OF STATE
    PUBLICATION 7277
    Disarmament Series 5
    Released September 1961
    Office of Public Services
    BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
    INTRODUCTION
    The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind,
    THE UNITED STATES
    HAS INTRODUCED AT THE SIXTEENTH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS A PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD.
    This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:
    FIRST, THERE MUST BE IMMEDIATE DISARMAMENT ACTION:
    A STRENUOUS AND UNINTERRUPTED EFFORT MUST BE MADE TOWARD THE GOAL OF GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.
    Second, ALL DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS MUST BE SUBJECT TO EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS:
    The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.
    Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:
    There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand AND THE BUILDING UP OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE-KEEPING MACHINERY AND INSTITUTIONS ON THE OTHER. NATIONS ARE UNLIKELY TO SHED THEIR MEANS OF SELF-PROTECTION IN THE ABSENCE OF ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO SAFEGUARD THEIR LEGITIMATE INTERESTS.
    THIS CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH THE PROGRESSIVE STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
    UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS
    AND BY CREATING A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE TO ENFORCE THE PEACE AS THE DISARMAMENT PROCESS PROCEEDS.
    ________________________________________
    There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

    ————————————————
    THIS IS A SUMMARY… full text shall be posted next

    ——————————————————
    DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
    The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
    In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:
    THE DISBANDING OF ALL NATIONAL ARMED FORCES AND THE PROHIBITION OF THEIR REESTABLISHMENT IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED TO PRESERVE INTERNAL ORDER AND FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE;
    The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, OTHER THAN THOSE REQUIRED FOR A UNITED NATIONS PEACE FORCE AND FOR MAINTAINING INTERNAL ORDER;
    The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, and for the maintenance of peace IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS;
    The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.
    TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES
    The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form port of the total program.
    GOVERNING PRINCIPLES
    The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:
    AS STATES RELINQUISH THEIR ARMS, THE UNITED NATIONS MUST BE PROGRESSIVELY STRENGTHENED IN ORDER TO IMPROVE ITS CAPACITY TO ASSURE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND THE PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES;
    Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
    Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
    Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and
    Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.
    DISARMAMENT STAGES
    The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTION.
    FIRST STAGE
    The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:
    The nuclear threat would be reduced:
    All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
    The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
    States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
    States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
    A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
    Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
    Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; THEIR PRODUCTION WOULD BE DISCONTINUED OR LIMITED; THEIR TESTING WOULD BE LIMITED OR HALTED.
    Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
    The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
    An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
    Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
    The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons of mass destruction would be prohibited.
    States would give advance notification of space vehicle and military launchings.
    U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
    MEASURES WOULD BE TAKEN TO DEVELOP AND STRENGTHEN UNITED NATIONS ARRANGEMENTS FOR ARBITRATION, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT IN STAGE II OF A PERMANENT U.N. PEACE FORCE.
    AN INTERNATIONAL DISARMAMENT ORGANIZATION would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
    Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
    It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
    It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
    States would be committed to measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
    States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
    A U.N. PEACE OBSERVATION GROUP would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
    STATES WOULD BE COMMITTED TO GIVE ADVANCE NOTICE OF MAJOR MILITARY MOVEMENTS which might cause alarm, observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
    SECOND STAGE
    The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:
    Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
    Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS;
    Establishment of a permanent international peace force WITHIN THE UNITED NATIONS;
    Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological, and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
    On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
    The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
    The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.
    THIRD STAGE
    During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:
    States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
    The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
    The peace keeping capabilities of the United nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
    ________________________________________
    APPENDIX


  • WA State Bathroom Rule

    WA State Bathroom Rule
    SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY
    Chapter 162-32-010 WAC TOOK EFFECT DEC. 26, 2015

    —————————-
    ULTIMATELY WE THE PEOPLE MUST HOLD OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES RESPONSIBLE

    ————————–
    The final rule removed any discretion for school officials and mandates that all schools must allow boys into the girl’s locker room if they claim to be a girl.

    —————————————–
    This inclusion of sexual identity that shall allow persons with biological male bodies who identify as girls/women to use girls/women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, and other sex-specific facilities, without having legally changed their names or undergone surgery or hormone treatment.

    —————————————–

    Allowing boy’s/men unrestricted access to girl’s /women’s restrooms and locker rooms, if they claim to be a girl,  “defies common sense and common decency.”

    ——————————
    BOY’S WILL BE BOY’S OR NOT?

    What If A BOY/MAN just claims to be a girl/women?  FOR THE FUN OF IT?

    Boy’s/men dressed OR UNDRESSED AS IN NAKED, SHALL BE ALLOWED unrestricted use of women’s restrooms and locker rooms?

    So, all you GIRLS /women who are uncomfortable with the naked guy over there, “Please come with me and leave him alone.”

    The opponents of this WA State WAC must use every argument available to protect our public school girls, teenagers, middle school, high school, college students and the adult female population of the state of WA from SEXUAL TAUNTING,  HARASSMENT AND ASSAULT.

    ————————————
    Sexual predators look for opportunity. This WAC provides it.
     It shall give male sexual predators unrestricted access girl’s/women’s restrooms, lockers and showers.

    96% of people who sexually abuse children are male

    WHILE THE WA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HAS AUTHORITY DELEGATED TO IT BY THE WA STATE LEGISLATURE,

    THE WA STATE LEGISLATURE HAS THE AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY TO CORRECT MISTAKES MADE BY AGENCIES OR COMMISSIONS.

    ULTIMATELY WE THE PEOPLE MUST HOLD OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES RESPONSIBLE
    —————————————————————————————–
    SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY
    Chapter 162-32-010 WAC TOOK EFFECT DEC. 26, 2015
    ————————————————————————————-

    Washington Quietly Adopts New Transgender Bathroom …

    dailysignal.com/…/washingtonquietlyadoptsnewtransgenderbathroo

    One day after Christmas, Washington state quietly adopted a set of new policies regarding transgender individuals using sex-specific facilities. The rules, adopted by the state Human Rights Commission, make it illegal for business owners to limit sex-specific facilities such as bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms to persons with the anatomical parts of one sex.

    “To my knowledge, this is the first time in the country that there’s been a statewide effort to mandate all public accommodations cooperate with the gender identity concept that somebody declares,” Joseph Backholm, executive director of the Family Policy Institute of Washington, told The Daily Signal.

    —————————————————————————————–

    New Bathroom Rule: It’s Worse Than We Thought

    www.fpiw.org/blog/2016/01/…/bathroomruleitsworsethanwethough

    2 days ago – But as details have become available, it appears the final version of the rule is actually worse than the proposed rule. Here are some of the …
    New Bathroom Rule: It’s Worse Than We Thought
    by Joseph Backholm, FPIW.org | January 6, 2016
    Last week, news broke about a new rule passed by the Washington State Human Rights Commission creating a statewide mandate that businesses must allow men into women’s bathrooms and locker rooms if they say they are a woman.

    But as details have become available, it appears the final version of the rule is actually worse than the proposed rule. Here are some of the “highlights”:

    1. Mandate on Schools as Well as Businesses

    While the draft rule imposed a mandate on every business in the state, it provided discretion for schools to deal with each case on a case-by-case basis.

    However, the final rule removed any discretion for school officials and mandates that all schools must allow boys into the girl’s locker room if they claim to be a girl.
    • Mandate on schools as well as businesses
    While the draft rule imposed a mandate on every business in the state, it provided discretion for schools to deal with each case on a case-by-case basis.
    However, the final rule removed any discretion for school officials and mandates that all schools must allow boys into the girl’s locker room if they claim to be a girl.
    Women will be removed from the women’s restroom. Naked men will not.
    The rule states that it is illegal to ask someone who is confused about their gender to use a separate facility for the benefit of women and children who might be uncomfortable.
    However, once a man begins to undress in the women’s locker room a person who “expresses concern or discomfort…should be directed to a separate or gender-neutral facility.”
    So, all you women who are uncomfortable with the naked guy over there, “Please come with me and leave him alone.”

    —————————————————-
    • The rule bans lots of speech
    In addition to prohibiting reasonable accommodations that recognize the public’s right to privacy along with the bathroom needs of the transgendered, this rule targets a wide range of speech.
    It is illegal to ask “unwelcome personal questions about an individual’s sexual orientation, gender expression or gender identity, or transgender status.”
    The commission provides no guidance to the public about how they are supposed to know which questions are unwelcome before they ask them.
    It is also illegal for a business to deliberately “misuse” someone’s preferred pronoun. If a man believes he is a woman, but you refer to him as a “he” anyway, he can sue you.
    However, you should be careful not to ask questions about which pronoun he prefers. Remember, if that’s an “unwelcome question” he can sue you for that.
    It is also now illegal to use “offensive names, slurs, jokes, or terminology regarding an individual’s sexual orientation or gender expression or gender identity.”
    The fact that “offensive” is an undefined and completely subjective term that provides no guidance to the public about what they can and cannot do is apparently lost on the commission.
    The best advice may be to just stop speaking. As we all know, someone is offended by everything.
    ________________________________________
    WATCH: Joseph Backholm answers some FAQ’s on the new bathroom policy
    As the public wrestles with how to respond to this, here are some of the most frequent questions we have been asked in the last few days.
    1. Is this really true?
    Very few other media outlets have covered this story. That has led a lot of people to wonder if there isn’t some kind of mistake. Sadly, there is no mistake. Other news outlets have began to cover the story here, here, and here.
    2. What will happen if I violate this rule?
    The Human Rights Commission has the authority to issue fines and create a range of orders intended to “eliminate the effects of an unfair practice and prevent the recurrence of the unfair practice.”
    The rule specifically states that businesses and schools open themselves up to civil liability for violations of any of their new rules.
    3. Who made this rule anyway?
    The Washington State Human Rights Commission was created to help enforce the Washington State Law Against Discrimination. The Washington State Human Rights Commission was created to help enforce the Washington State Law Against Discrimination. There are five members who are appointed by the Governor and are not subject to election. You can find them here.
    While rule-making authority is frequently delegated to agencies for the purpose of enforcing laws the legislature passes, the concern is that a policy of this magnitude and scope far exceeds what the legislature intended or the public expected when the non-discrimination law was passed.
    4. What can I do?
    While the Human Rights Commission has authority delegated to it by the legislature, the legislature has the authority and responsibility to correct mistakes made by agencies or commissions.
    You can contact your legislators through the legislative hotline at 1-800-562-6000 or email them all at one time by clicking here.  If we know your address, this tool allow you to email them all at once.
    5. Isn’t this outrage just much ado about nothing?
    If you believe this could never happen, simply search for Jason Pomares, Norwood Smith Burnes, or Taylor Buehler on the search engine of your choice.

     

    Burnes exposed himself to children in a Walmart restroom in 2010 while Pomares dressed as a woman and snuck into a Macy’s bathroom to videotape women in 2013.  Buehler wore a bra and wig and slipped into a bathroom and locker room in 2012 to watch women at Everett Community College. All three men were arrested.

    In addition, Christopher Hambrook sexually assaulted multiple women in a Toronto women’s shelter while “identifying” as a woman.

    Sexual predators look for opportunity. This provides it.
    Everything we do is made possible by friends like you. If you can chip in $5 or more to help restore rational bathroom policies, we’d be grateful.

    ——————————————————

    New rule in Washington opens bathroom use to transgender people
    Posted 10:32 AM, January 6, 2016, by Associated Press
    ———————————————————————————-

    UPDATE JAN 8, 2015

    UPDATE: Click here to see Governor Jay Inslee’s response to the Human Rights Commission’s bathroom rule.
    From: FAMILY POLICY INSTITUTE OF WASHINGTON <info@fpiw.org>
    Legislative Hotline: 1-800-562-6000 Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

    Gov. Inslee Won’t Answer Question About Bathroom Rule; Bryant Opposes

    Print pagePDF page

    On December 26th, a new rule went into effect that has generated a significant public response.   The rule, which was passed by the Washington State Human Rights Commission, mandates that all schools and businesses in Washington State maintain open bathroom/locker room policies which will allow people to choose the facility they want to use based on their gender identity or gender expression.

    It makes it illegal for any school or business to ask someone to use a bathroom that corresponds to their biological gender or to provide them a separate gender neutral option.

    Members of the Human Rights Commission are appointed by Governor Inslee.

    InsleeYesterday, FPIW communications director Zach Freeman had a chance to talk with Gov. Jay Inslee as well as his Republican challenger Bill Bryant to ask them their thoughts on the new rule.

    Gov. Inslee appeared uncomfortable and resorted to asking Mr. Freeman a series of questions in an apparent attempt to avoid answering any questions himself:

    Gov. Inslee: Are you a journalist?

    Mr. Freeman: I’m trying to be.

    Gov. Inslee: Who do you work with?

    Mr. Freeman: The Family Policy Institute of Washington

    Gov. Inslee: Who is that?

    Mr. Freeman: It’s Joseph Backholm’s group…

    Gov. Inslee: It’s a what group?

    Mr. Freeman: It’s a group that does family policy

    Gov. Inslee: Well what kind of family policy

    Mr. Freeman: We do issues of marriage, life, religious freedom…the things that nobody really likes to talk about.

    Gov. Inslee: Really? What kind of things are they working on?

    Mr. Freeman: Well, at the moment I’m actually asking about the bathroom rule that was proposed by the Human Rights Commission…

    Gov. Inslee then cut off the question by again asking Mr. Freeman if he was a journalist and who he was working for.

    He concluded the exchange by telling Mr. Freeman that if he became a part of the Associated Press “then I’m really happy to answer your question.”

    After the interview, FPIW reached out to Governor Inslee’s press office for a statement on the issue but they have not responded.

    BryantBill Bryant, the only current challenger to Gov. Inslee in the 2016 gubernatorial election, was also in Olympia yesterday. He was more willing to discuss the issue. “Everybody deserves to be in an environment where they feel safe.” Bryant said.  “That includes someone who is transitioning between genders, but it also includes a high school girl who wants to go into a locker room.  I think the Human Rights Commission picked the rights of one group over the rights of others.”

    Bryant suggested that it would be appropriate for the Governor to set the rule aside for 24 or 48 months so that the legislature can address it.  You can hear Mr. Bryant’s statement below:

    00:00
    00:00

    If you are a member of the Associated Press, you can contact the Governor’s office at 360-902-4111 where he would apparently be happy to answer your questions about this issue.  Please do ask, because the rest of us would like to know.

    Everyone else can use that number to share their thoughts about this issue with the Governor.  If you do, please be respectful. He needs to hear from you, but not if you’re angry.  That only hurts the cause.   Besides, the person answering the phone is not the Governor.  It’s just someone doing their job who probably hasn’t ever done anything mean to you.  But if you’re kind to them, they’ll be happy to relay the message.

    You can also email the Governor by clicking here.

    ————————————————————————-

    HOW THE CITIZEN’S OF HOUSTON GOT THE HOUSTON’S EQUAL RIGHTS ORDINANCE (HERO), ORDINANCE TO THE VOTERS..

     

    FIRST THEY GATHERED APPROXIMATELY 55,000 SIGNATURES
    Opponents of Equal Rights Ordinance sue Mayor Annise Parker, city of Houston
    Posted On 6 Aug, 2014 – By John Wright
    “Indeed, approximately 55,000 signatures were turned in, and the Coalition itself verified over 31,000 signers were properly registered to vote,” the lawsuit states. “Unfortunately, however, even though Defendant Russell certified the result, the ERO Referendum Petition was wrongfully rejected.
    As expected, opponents of the ordinance filed the lawsuit against Mayor Annise Parker and the city after officials announced that a petition to repeal the measure didn’t have enough valid signatures to qualify for the ballot.

    Read the lawsuit, along with Russell’s memo from last Friday, below.

     

    Anti-HERO Petition Lawsuit by HERO Petition
    The lawsuit was filed in state district court by former Harris County GOP Chairman Jared Woodfill and anti-gay activist Steven Hotze, along with Pastor F.N. Williams Sr. and Pastor Max Miller. The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction forcing the city to suspend the ordinance and place a repeal on the ballot in November. The Houston Chronicle reports that a hearing on the request was held late Tuesday.

    ————————————–
    Houston voters reject LGBT nondiscrimination ordinance
    USA Today Network KHOU-TV, Houston 9:33 a.m. CST November 4, 2015
    The ordinance was initially approved by the Houston City Council in May 2014
    BUT A LAWSUIT TO HAVE RESIDENTS VOTE ON THE MEASURE EVENTUALLY MADE IT TO THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT, WHICH IN JULY ORDERED THE CITY TO EITHER REPEAL THE ORDINANCE OR PUT IT ON THE BALLOT.
    HOUSTON – Voters have said a resounding no to Houston’s controversial equal rights ordinance. Prop 1, failed by a margin of 62-percent to 38-percent.
    Opponents of the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance branded it “the bathroom ordinance,” playing up the argument that it would allow men dressed as women to use women’s restrooms. A television ad featured a little girl being cornered by a man in a restroom.
    Why LGBT Advocates Think They Lost in Houston Election
    dailysignal.com/…/why-lgbt-advocates-think-they-lost-in-houston-electio…
    Nov 4, 2015 – Failing to pass the Houston Equal Rights Protection Ordinance Tuesday night … who have won recent victories at the U.S. Supreme Court and beyond. … Opponents focused on that angle, branding HERO as a “bathroom bill. … ordinance would have allowed,” Jonathan Saenz, president of Texas Values, …

    Dave Welch, executive director of the Houston Area Pastor Council, another group that’s been fighting the ordinance for the past 18 months called the outcome a “victory of common decency.” In an email to The Daily Signal, he said:
    The victory of common decency in defeating this ordinance is a reminder to pastors across the country that together and united, our voices can make a difference, even when outnumbered by a massive propaganda campaign and vastly outspent. These ordinances that are part of a national campaign of the Human Rights Campaign in their attempt to force their radical anti-faith, anti-family, anti-freedom agenda on local communities can be defeated, so we hope this encourages pastors and citizens around the country.
    Ultimately, the people in Houston decided against the measure by a 62-38 margin. That margin, supporters say, is an honest reflection of the city’s values.
    “What the left cannot handle is that the election results are an accurate representation of the values of this city,” Saenz said. “Faith, family, and freedom.”