+menu-


  • Category Archives An Open And Transparent Government?
  • WA State Ecology is Back to WAC Us

    Chapter 173-03 WAC, PUBLIC RECORDS

    Incorporates changes made by Emergency Rule- WAC 173-03-9000E

    Why it matters?

    SIMPLY PUT…..

    Behind My Back | “Ecology Sucks”

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/04/15/ecology-sucks/

    APR 15, 2013 – “Ecology Sucks” And, the rest of the story. The local news … citizenreviewonline.org/ecologys-qa-session-in-sequim-about-… Jan 17, 2013 …

     How much will PUBLIC RECORDS cost us?

    ——————————————————–

    Behind My Back | WA State DOE Emergency Fee Rule?

    www.behindmyback.org/2017/07/24/wa-state-doe-emergency-fee-rule/

    JUL 24, 2017 – July 20, 2016 Public Records Emergency Rule WAC 173-03-9000E CALCULATION OF ACTUAL COSTS OF PRODUCING COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS DECLARED …

    WA STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY finds that it is in the general welfare and the public interest, and benefits requesters and the agency, to adopt the emergency rule in order to preserve AND UPDATE FEES in accordance with the legislatively adopted schedule.

    WITHOUT FURTHER ACTION, THIS WOULD CREATE A PERIOD OF MONTHS DURING WHICH NO STATEMENT OR RULE WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC REGARDING PRA (PUBLIC RECORDS ACT) COSTS

    OR THE METHODS OF CALCULATING THEM, CREATING CONFUSION AND UNCERTAINTY REGARDING ECOLOGY’S FEE STRUCTURE AND ITS (WA STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY’S) ABILITY TO CHARGE FEES.

    ———————————————————————–

    EINSTEIN SAID, “IF YOU CAN’T PUT IT SIMPLY, YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND IT VERY WELL”

    JAN 17, 2013  “IT’S A MONEY DEAL,” I said, adding, “ECOLOGY SUCKS”,  (which prompted a flurry of applause)

    SIMPLY PUT:  THE WA STATE  DEPT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) CHANGES TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS  A MONEY DEAL.

    JAN 20, 2013 “ECOLOGY SUCKS” WAS MY  PUBLISHED OPINION AND ON SEPT 22, 2017  I’M STICKING WITH IT!

    —————————————————————

    This is the 994th posting on behindmyback.org since Jan 29, 2013

    This posting is over 3000 words.

    —————————————————————————–

    Complete unedited text

    —– Original Message —–

    From: Ballard, Laura (ECY)

    To: ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK@LISTSERV.WA.GOV

    Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 6:52 AM

    Subject: The following rulemaking proposal was filed with the Office of the Code Reviser: Chapter 173-03 WAC, Public Records The following rulemaking proposal was filed with the Office of the Code Reviser: September 15, 2017

    Chapter 173-03 WAC, Public Records

    For more information:

    http://www.ecy.wa.gov/laws-rules/wac17303/1614ov.html

    ——————————————————————

    Chapter 173-03 WAC Public Records

    Incorporates changes made by Emergency Rule- WAC 173-03-9000E

    Overview

    Introduction

    The Department of Ecology is proposing amendments to Chapter 173-03 WAC Public Records. The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of the Public Records Act including the process the agency uses for disclosing records.

    This update will modernize the rule to reflect current law, technology, and processes. On 7/20/17 we filed an emergency rule amendment to implement changes passed by the legislature during the 2017 legislative session.  This emergency rule will be in place until 11/17/2017.  The content of this emergency rule will be included in the permanent rulemaking we are conducting.

    Why it matters

    The rule has not been updated since 1998 and needs to reflect current law, technology, and processes. The rule also contains outdated information about Ecology programs and staff, which will be made current and will reflect changes made in the 2017 legislative session.

    Scope of rule development

    Ecology is proposing to amend Chapter 173-03 WAC. This update will modernize the rule to reflect current law, technology, and processes.

    Process of development

    Please refer to the Timeline and Public Involvement information to stay informed about the rulemaking.

    —————————————————————————

    To join or leave ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK click here:

    http://listserv.wa.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ECOLOGY-WAC-TRACK

    ——————————————————————-

    Chapter 173-03 WAC

    PUBLIC RECORDS

    Complete Chapter

    WAC Sections

    173-03-010

    What is the purpose of this chapter?

    173-03-020

    How are specific terms defined in this chapter?

    173-03-030

    How is the department of ecology organized?

    173-03-040

    How do I get access to the public records of the department of ecology?

    173-03-050

    What records are retained and how are they indexed?

    173-03-060

    How do I request a public record?

    173-03-070

    How much will it cost me to view a public record?

    173-03-080

    What happens when the department denies a public records request?

    173-03-090

    What do I do if I object to the department’s denial to review a public record?

    173-03-100

    How does the department protect public records?

     

    ————————————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003?

    WAC 173-03-010

    What is the purpose of this chapter?

    The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 relating to public records.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-010, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-010, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-010, filed 1/17/78.]

    —————————————————————————

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-020

    How are specific terms defined in this chapter?

    (1) The terms “person,” “public record,” and “writing” shall have the meanings as stated in RCW 42.17.020.

    (2) “Department” means the department of ecology.

    (3) “Director” means the director of the department.

    (4) “Public records officer” means the employee designated as such by the department.

    (5) “Designee” means the employee of the department designated by the director or the public records officer to serve as the public records coordinator at the headquarters offices or at each of the regional offices in the absence of the officer.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-020, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-020, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-020, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-030

    How is the department of ecology organized?

    (1) Headquarters office.

    (a) The headquarters office is located at 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey, Washington. The mailing address for the headquarters office is:

    Department of Ecology

    P.O. Box 47600

    Olympia, Washington 98504-7600

    The mailing address for the nuclear waste management program’s Hanford project is:

    Nuclear Waste Management

    1315 W. 4th Ave.

    Kennewick, WA 99336

    (b) The offices of the director, deputy director(s), program managers and other agency officials are located in the headquarters office.

    (c) The titles of the executive staff are as follows:

    Chief financial officer for financial services.

    Administrative services manager for administrative services.

    Director for intergovernmental relations.

    Director for employee services.

    Director for communications and education.

    Assistant administrator for spills prevention, preparedness and response.

    (2) The program offices located in the headquarters office are:

    (a) Air quality;

    (b) Water resources;

    (c) Water quality;

    (d) Toxics cleanup;

    (e) Nuclear waste;

    (f) Solid waste and financial assistance;

    (g) Hazardous waste and toxics reductions;

    (h) Environmental investigations and laboratory services; and

    (i) Shorelands and environmental assistance.

    (3) Regional offices and their geographical jurisdictions are as follows:

    (a) Northwest regional office (Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, San Juan, Island, King, and Kitsap counties):

    3190 – 160th Avenue S.E.

    Bellevue, WA 98008-5452

    (b) Southwest regional office (Pierce, Thurston, Mason, Clallam, Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Pacific, Lewis, Cowlitz, Wahkiakum, Clark, and Skamania counties):

    300 Desmond Drive

    Lacey, WA 98503

    Mailing address:

    P.O. Box 47775

    Olympia, Washington 98504-7775

    (c) Central regional office (Okanogan, Chelan, Douglas, Kittitas, Yakima, Benton, and Klickitat counties):

    15 West Yakima, Suite 200

    Yakima, WA 98902-3401

    (d) Eastern regional office (Ferry, Stevens, Pend Oreille, Grant, Lincoln, Spokane, Adams, Whitman, Franklin, Walla Walla, Columbia, Garfield, and Asotin counties):

    1. 4601 Monroe, Suite 100

    Spokane, Washington 99205-1295

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-030, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-030, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-030, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-030, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————–

    WAC 173-03-040

    How do I get access to the public records of the department of ecology?

    (1) All public records of the department are available for public inspection and copying under these rules subject to subsections (2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section.

    (2) Availability of public records is subject to the exemptions and prohibitions against disclosure contained in RCW 42.17.310, 42.17.130, 42.17.255, 42.17.260, and 90.52.020. In addition, individuals may request, and ecology may grant, confidentiality of documents from disclosure under RCW 43.21A.160 and 70.105.170.

    (3) When a public record includes information which, if disclosed, would lead to an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy, and the department becomes aware of this fact, the department shall delete such information before making the record available.

    (4) Public records requested may not be readily available for immediate inspection. If the requested records are not readily available, the department shall notify the requester when and where those records will be available.

    (5) Public records of the department are kept by the department or state archives until scheduled for destruction by the records retention schedule in accordance with chapter 40.14 RCW. Public records subject to a request for disclosure when scheduled for destruction shall be retained by the department and may not be erased or destroyed until the request is resolved.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-040, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-040, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-040, filed 1/17/78.]

    ——————————————————————

    WAC 173-03-050

    What records are retained and how are they indexed?

    The records retention schedule established by the division of state archives of the office of the secretary of state serves as an index for the identification and location of the following records:

    (1) All records issued before July 1, 1990, for which the department has maintained an index;

    (2) Final orders entered after June 30, 1990, that are issued in adjudicative proceedings as defined in RCW 34.05.010(1) and that contain an analysis or decision of substantial importance to the department in carrying out its duties;

    (3) Declaratory orders entered after June 30, 1990, that are issued pursuant to RCW 34.05.240 and that contain an analysis or decision of substantial importance to the department in carrying out its duties; and

    (4) Interpretive statements as defined in RCW 34.05.010(8) that were entered after June 30, 1990.

    The records retention schedule indexes records according to the originating program or section, and then the record series title. Each title is further identified by a statement of function or purpose, and the retention period. The records retention schedule is available to the public for inspection and copying. With the assistance of the public records officer or designee, any person can obtain access to public records of the department using the records retention schedule.

    A separate index of policy statements as defined in RCW 34.05.010(4) entered after June 30, 1990, shall be maintained by the department’s policy manual coordinator or designees.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-050, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-050, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-050, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————–

    No agency filings affecting this section since 2003

    WAC 173-03-060

    How do I request a public record?

    (1) All requests for inspection or copying made in person at a department office shall be made on a form substantially as follows:

    REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS

    Date of Request . . . .

    Time of Request . . . .

    Name . . . .

    Address . . . .

    . . . .

    Description of Records:

    . . . .

    . . . .

    . . . .

    I understand that if a list of individuals is provided me by the Department of Ecology, it will neither be used to promote the election of an official nor promote nor oppose a ballot proposition as prohibited by RCW 42.17.130 nor for commercial purposes nor give or provide access to material to others for commercial purposes as prohibited by RCW 42.17.260(9).

    I understand that I will be charged the amount necessary to reimburse the department’s cost for copying.

    . . . .

    Signature

    Number of pages to be copied

    . . . .

    Number of copies per page

    . . . .

    Charge per copy

    $

    . . . .

    Special copy work charge

    $

    . . . .

    Staff time charge

    $

    . . . .

    Total charge

    $

    . . . .

    (2) You may request records in person at a department of ecology office between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.

    (3) If you make your request by mail, your request must contain the following information:

    (a) The name and address of the person making the request and the organization the person represents;

    (b) The time of day and calendar date on which the person wishes to inspect the public records;

    (c) A description of the public records requested;

    (d) A statement whether access to copying equipment is desired;

    (e) A phone number where the person can be reached in case the public records officer or designate needs to contact the person for further description of the material or any other reason.

    (f) A statement that the record will not be used for commercial purposes.

    (4) The department must receive all requests at least five business days before the requested date of inspection to allow the public records officer or designee to make certain the requested records are available and not exempt and, if necessary, to contact the person requesting inspection. The department will process all requests in a timely manner. However, large requests or requests for public records maintained offsite may require more than five business days to prepare. The department will respond to your request within five business days of receiving it, by either:

    (a) Providing the record;

    (b) Acknowledging that the department has received the request and providing a reasonable estimate of the time the department will require to respond to the request; or

    (c) Denying the public record request.

    Additional time required to respond to a request may be based upon the need to clarify the intent of the request, to locate and assemble the information requested, to notify third persons or agencies affected by the request, or to determine whether any of the information requested is exempt and that a denial should be made as to all or part of the request. In acknowledging receipt of a public record request that is unclear, the department may ask the requestor to clarify what information the requestor is seeking. If the requestor fails to clarify the request, the agency need not respond to it.

    (5) The department may in its discretion fill requests made by telephone or facsimile copy (fax).

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-060, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-060, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-060, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-060, filed 1/17/78.]

    ————————————————————————————–

    WAC 173-03-070

    How much will it cost me to view a public record?

    The department does not charge a fee for the inspection of public records. The department will charge an amount necessary to reimburse its costs for providing copies of records. This amount shall be reviewed from time to time by the department, and shall represent the costs of providing copies of public records and for use of the department’s copy equipment, including staff time spent copying records, preparing records for copying, and restoring files. This charge is the amount necessary to reimburse the department for its actual costs for copying and is payable at the time copies are furnished. The charge for special copy work of nonstandard public records shall reflect the total cost, including the staff time necessary to safeguard the integrity of these records.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-070, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-070, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-070, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-070, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————-

    WAC 173-03-080

    What happens when the department denies a public records request?

    When the department refuses, in whole or part, a request for inspection of any public record, it must include a statement of the specific exemption authorizing the refusal and a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record withheld.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-080, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-080, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————————-

    WAC 173-03-090

    What do I do if I object to the department’s denial to review a public record?

    (1) Any person who objects to the refusal of a request for a public record may petition for prompt review of that decision by submitting a written request for review. The written request shall specifically refer to the written statement by the public records officer or designee which constituted or accompanied the refusal.

    (2) Immediately after receiving a written request for review of a decision denying a public record, the public records officer or other staff member denying the request shall refer it to the director or the director’s delegate. The director or delegate shall immediately consider the matter and either affirm or reverse the refusal. The final decision shall be sent to the objecting person within two business days following receipt of the petition for review.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-090, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-090, filed 1/17/78.]

    ————————————————————————

    WAC 173-03-100

    How does the department protect public records?

    In order to adequately protect the public records of the department, you must comply with the following guidelines while inspecting public records:

    (1) You may not remove any public record from the department’s premises.

    (2) You must have a designated department employee present while you are inspecting a public record.

    (3) You may not mark or deface a public record in any manner during inspection.

    (4) You may not dismantle public records which are maintained in a file or jacket, or in chronological or other filing order, or those records which, if lost or destroyed, would constitute excessive interference with the department’s essential functions.

    (5) Access to file cabinets, shelves, vaults, or other storage areas is restricted to department personnel, unless other arrangements are made with the public records officer or designee.

    [Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250. WSR 98-16-052 (Order 98-12), § 173-03-100, filed 7/31/98, effective 8/31/98. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340 and 1992 c 139. WSR 92-20-116 (Order 92-37), § 173-03-100, filed 10/7/92, effective 11/7/92. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.17.060 and 42.17.260. WSR 90-21-119 (Order 90-37), § 173-03-100, filed 10/23/90, effective 11/23/90. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.250 – 42.17.340. WSR 78-02-041 (Order DE 77-35), § 173-03-100, filed 1/17/78.]

    ———————————————————————-

    The bottom line…..

    THE WA STATE  DEPT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) CHANGES TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS  A MONEY DEAL.

    JAN 20, 2013 “ECOLOGY SUCKS” WAS MY  PUBLISHED OPINION AND ON SEPT 22, 2017  I’M STICKING WITH IT!


  • 2012 SMP Issues Left on the Table

    June 9, 2017  My Updated Public Comment  CLALLAM COUNTY WA SMP

    Subject: SMP PUBLIC COMMENT JULY 14, 2012  ON THE SMP Advisory Committee

    THE PREVIOUS CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES

    July 10, 2012 the 19 SMP Issues left on the table by the Clallam County SMP (citizens?) Advisory Committee.

    Two thirds or more of the SMP (citizens?) Advisory Committee VOTED TO WALK  AWAY FROM THE TABLE,

    LEAVING 19 OR MORE PROPOSED SMP DRAFT ISSUES RELATED TO THE DOE SMP TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT ARGUMENT, SUGGESTIONS OR COMMENT?

    INDEED, THE INTENT OF A PARTY CAN BE DETERMINED BY EXAMINING THE UNDERSTANDING OF A REASONABLE PERSON, AFTER CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE NEGOTIATIONS, ANY PRACTICES THE PARTIES HAVE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THEMSELVES, USAGES AND ANY SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    ———————————————————–

    The 19 SMP Update unresolved issues left on the table, At the July 10, 2012 SMP Committee Advisory meeting, Against my suggestion that we needed an additional August meeting to complete our duty to the citizens and private property owners, as SMP advisors, prior to the final SMP draft proposal being written.

    If any of you read this complete July 14, 2012 comment? You understand fully, why I am critical of the two thirds majority of the Advisory Committee members that failed to complete their responsibility to the citizens and private property owners of Clallam County, prior to the 2017 final SMP Draft Proposal, being given to the Clallam County Planning Commission.

    July 10, 2012 The last remark Steve Gray made to me, nearly five years ago was “I just want to get this over with.” 

    ————————————————————

    SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    SMP Cumulative Impact on People

    Posted on November 18, 2014 10:35 am by Pearl Rains Hewett

    This is my Clallam County SMP Public comment and objection

    Pearl Rains Hewett

    ———————————————————-

    SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    Clallam County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – New Revised SMP Draft (June 2017)

    —– Original Message —–

    From: zSMP
    Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:39 PM
    Subject: FW: Clallam County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – New Revised SMP Draft (June 2017)

    Interested Parties,

    You are receiving this email because you are on the Clallam County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update email notification list.  The County Department of Community Development (DCD) has just released a Revised SMP Draft (June 2017). 

    An “INTERESTED PARTY SINCE JAN 26, 2011?” concerned, vested, voting, Clallam County private shoreline property owner and member of SMP Update (citizens) Advisory Committee.

    —– Original Message —–

    Saturday, July 14, 2012 3:13 PM

    THE REST OF THE STORY…….

    THE PREVIOUS CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    From: pearl hewett

    to  zSMP

    Cc: several

    Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 3:13 PM

    Subject: SMP COMMENT #292 ON THE SMP Advisory Committee

    This is my full comment on the SMP Advisory Committee

    Pearl Rains Hewett Trustee

    George C. Rains Estate

    Concerned Member SMP Advisory Committee

    At the July 10, 2012 SMP Committee Advisory meeting

    Two thirds or more of the SMP Advisory Committee

    VOTED TO WALK  AWAY FROM THE TABLE,

    against my suggestion that we needed an additional August meeting to complete our duty to the citizens and private property owners, as SMP advisors, prior to the final SMP draft proposal being written.

    The SMP Advisory Committee that  represent the 3300 Clallam County shoreline private property owners is approximately as follows.

    1/3 = 10 private interest groups

    1/3 = 10 paid government employees

    1/3 = 10 SMP Affected taxpaying private property owners (only 8 at this meeting)

    DOES THE MAKEUP OF THIS COMMITTEE EXPLAINS WHY?

    THEY VOTED TO WALK  AWAY FROM THE TABLE

    LEAVING 19 OR MORE PROPOSED SMP DRAFT ISSUES RELATED TO THE DOE SMP TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY without argument, suggestions or comment?

    (1) DISCUSSED AND QUESTIONED? The undecipherable table with the percentages, the 15% of whatever? It made no sense to me either? One vested citizen, could help with  his knowledge of what he thought it actually was/represented? It would be very helpful to members of the committee.

    The written text related to the undecipherable table below

    1. Minor new development Grading shall not exceed 500 cubic yards; and ii. Land disturbing activities shall not exceed 20,000 square feet, except that on parcels less than five (5) acres, land disturbing activities must not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the gross parcel size; and iii. The total cumulative footprint of all structures on a parcel must be less than 4,000 square feet; and iv. The total cumulative impervious surface area on the parcel must be less than ten (10) . All land disturbing activities must be located on slopes less than fifteen (15) percent; and vi. All land disturbing activities must comply with any critical area buffer and other protection standards established for parcels created by land division.

    ————————————————————————

    (2) DISCUSSED AND QUESTIONED? NOT ADDRESSED

    The limited number of trained specialists,  Engineer’s  comment was in reference to the county SMP  requiring specialists, to perform the mitigation tests. If a property owner could even find one to do the testing? The time delay and cost would be prohibitive.

    ——————————————————————-

    (3) PRESENTED NOT DISCUSSED

    SMP Excessive restrictions on all forms of developments. I am extremely concerned about the additional restrictive requirements written into the SMP update for major development. They are counter- productive to the economic recovery of Clallam County, they restrict the ability of business and citizens to create employment opportunities in both Clallam County and Port Angeles. Why are the Dept. of Community Development and the planning biting off their own feet? Why are they creating these obsessive restrictions on all developments?

    The way Steve was talking it, with all the added bells and whistles, it was to make any form of mitigation for anything totally infeasible, creating a like it or lump it, situation for all development by business or private shoreline property owners.

    ———————————————————————

    (4) PRESENTED- DISCUSSED but NOT ADDRESSED

    The cumulative effect of setbacks SHORELINE, WETLAND and HABITAT   one citizen did a good job when he pointed out an example of the enormous  loss of private property use with the setbacks on Lake Pleasant, in conjunction with the yet undetermined, Clallam County DOE designated WETLANDS.

    ———————————————————————–

     (5) PRESENTED NOT ADDRESSED

    More additional HABITAT setbacks

    IT WAS IMPRESSIVE HOW SMOOTHLY MARGARET AND STEVE JUST ADDED ON THE ADDITIONAL HABITAT SETBACKS, BUT DID NOT MENTION ENDANGERED SPECIES.

    1. Rare, endangered, threatened and sensitive species means plant and animal species identified and listed by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as being severely limited or threatened with extinction within their native ranges.
    2. Threatened species means a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future, as classified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Natural Resources, Washington Natural Heritage Program, or the federal Endangered Species Act.

    ————————————————————————-

     

    (6)  COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED

    1. Recording means the filing of a document(s) for recordation with the County auditor.

    ————————————————————————————

    (7) NO DISCUSSION OR RESOLUTION (not required by law)

    1. Restoration means the reestablishment or upgrading of impaired ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be accomplished through measures including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of fill, removal of intrusive shoreline structures and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a requirement for returning the shoreline area to aboriginal or pre-European settlement conditions.

    ————————————————————————————

    (8) DOE DESIGNATED WETLANDS NOT IDENTIFIED OR INCORPORATED

    Wetlands have no boundaries, adjoining wetlands could restrict the use of your property.

    1. Wetlands means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created for non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands created as mitigation and wetland modified for approved land use activities shall be considered as regulated wetlands.

    PROHIBITED EXCEPTION DISCUSSED AND RESOLVED BY RCW

    Provisions for protection SHALL be included in SMP up date.

    1. Revetment means a sloped wall constructed of rip-rap or other suitable material placed on stream banks or other shorelines to retard bank erosion and minimize lateral stream movement.
    2. Rip-rap means dense, hard, angular rock free from cracks or other defects conductive to weathering often used for bulkheads, revetments or similar slope/bank stabilization purposes.

    ————————————————————————-

    (9) DISCUSSED UNDEFINED NO RESOLUTION [insert final date]

    3.1.1 Shoreline Environment Designations

    1. A shoreline environment designation has been assigned to each segment of the shoreline in accordance with this section. The designations are based on the following general factors:
    2. The ecological functions and processes that characterize the shoreline, together with the degree of human alteration as determined by the [insert final date] Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report and subsequent technical analyses; and

    ——————————————————————

    (10) NOT PRESENTED OR  DISCUSSED

     EXPENSE OF SPECIALISTS FOR APPROVAL

    1. c. Hazard Tree Removal: Removal of a hazard tree may be allowed in the buffer when trimming is not sufficient to address the hazard. Where the hazard is not immediately apparent to the Administrator, the hazard tree determination SHALL be made after Administrator review of a report prepared by a qualified arborist or forester.

    ——————————————————————–

    (11) NOT PRESENTED OR  DISCUSSED

    EXPENSE OF SPECIALISTS FOR APPROVAL

    1. Invasive Species Management: Removing invasive, non-native shoreline vegetation listed on the Clallam County Noxious Weed List may be allowed in the buffer when otherwise consistent with this Program. The disturbed areas must be promptly revegetated using species native to western Washington. The Administrator SHALL require a vegetation management plan prepared by a qualified ecologist, forester, arborist, or landscape architect prior to approving the invasive species removal. The vegetation management plan SHALL  identify and describe the location and extent of vegetation management. For properties within designated landslide or erosion hazard areas, the Administrator may require review of the vegetation management plan by an engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer to ensure that the vegetation management will not cause or exacerbate hazards associated with soil or slope instability. The location and size of the invasive species management area SHALL be clearly defined on the site plan

    ———————————————————————–

    (12) NOT DISCUSSED – ADDRESSED OR RESOLVED

    Taking of Value of view property by limited 20% KEYHOLE view corridor. If 50% of the value of your shoreline property is for the view? Losing 80% the view value will affect the true and real value of your property

    4.2.4 Regulations – Shoreline Buffers

    . 3. Buffer Condition: Shoreline buffers shall be maintained in a predominantly well vegetated and undisturbed condition to ensure that the buffer provides desired buffer functions including shade, habitat, organic inputs, large woody debris, slope stability, water storage, biofiltration, contaminant removal, and fine sediment control. Up to eighty percent (80%) of the buffer area shall be vegetated with native trees and shrubs. The remaining twenty percent (20%), or at least fifteen (15) linear feet of the water frontage, whichever is greater, may be retained as lawn for active use.

    1. Allowed Uses and Buffer Modifications: The Administrator may allow limited clearing, thinning, and/or pruning to accommodate specific shoreline buffer uses and modifications identified in this section. Such allowances shall not require compensatory mitigation provided that the amount and extent of the clearing, limbing, and/or pruning are the minimum necessary to accommodate the allowed use and all other requirements of the Program are met:

    —————————————————————————–

    (13) view corridor NOT DISCUSSED OR ADDRESSED limited and selective tree removal, pruning, and/or limbing in the buffer

    1. View Corridors: The Administrator may allow limited and selective tree removal, pruning, and/or limbing in the buffer to create a view of the shoreline when otherwise consistent with this Program. The removal, pruning, and/or limbing shall not require any ground-disturbing equipment and shall not materially alter soils or topography.

    ————————————————————————-

    (15) NOT DISCUSSED OR ADDRESSED

    EXPENSE OF SPECIALISTS FOR APPROVAL

    Administrator shall require a view clearance plan

    The Administrator shall require a view clearance plan prepared by a qualified ecologist, forester, arborist, or landscape architect prior to approving the view corridor. The view clearance plan shall identify and describe the location and extent of the proposed tree removal, pruning, and limbing and shall demonstrate compliance with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 Standards for Tree Care Operations (Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Management – Standard Practices). For properties within designated landslide or erosion hazard areas, the Administrator may require review of the view clearance plan by an engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer to ensure that the proposed removal, pruning, and/or limbing will not cause or exacerbate hazards associated with soil or slope instability. The location and size of the view corridor shall be clearly defined on the site plan.

    1. Private Pathways: Private pathways which provide pedestrian access to the shoreline may be allowed within the buffer provided they are constructed of pervious material, are less than or equal to six (6) feet wide, and follow a route that minimizes erosion and gullying

    ——————————————————————————–

    (16)  NOT DISCUSSED OR ADDRESSED

    Taking of Private property for Public access

    The removal of any reference to  the taking of private property for Public access, Clallam County has the highest public access to public land in WA State. At the Private DOE meeting on June 6, 2012 Gordon White agreed that we have sufficient cause 51% to remove any taking of private property for public access.

    —————————————————————————–

    (17) DISCUSSED AND DISMISSED

    EPA. Precautionary setback are not legal

     As questioned by Rob McKenna, why are the DOE SMP setbacks more restrictive the EPA. Precautionary setback are not legal.

    ——————————————————————————–

     (18) LEGALITY OF 80% TAKING  NOT DISCUSSED NOT ADDRESSED

    ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) NON-CONFORMING PROPERTY

    1. At least eighty percent (80%) of the buffer area between the structures and the shoreline and/or critical area is maintained in a naturally vegetated condition.

    What provisions have the DOE made to  stay within the LAW?

    “It is now undisputed that the county had no authority to deprive residents of the use of their own private property.”CAO’S 65 PERCENT” SEIZURE OF PROPERTY PLF Lauds Supreme Court for “Driving a Stake Through One of the Most Extreme Assaults on Property Rights in the U.S.”

    SEATTLE, WA; March 4, 2009: The Washington Supreme Court

    the CAO limited rural landowners with five acres or more to clearing only 35 percent of their property, forcing them to maintain the remaining 65 percent as native vegetation indefinitely. Rural landowners owning less than five acres were allowed to clear only 50 percent of their parcels. Affected landowners had to continue paying taxes on the portion of the property rendered useless by the CAO.

    —————————————————————————–

    (19) NOT DISCUSSED OR ADDRESSED

     THE PROVISIONS OF WAC173-26-191 ANYTHING THAT MAY BE  ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AT A STATE LEVEL,

     MAY ALSO BE  ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AT A COUNTY LEVEL AND SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN CLALLAM COUNTY SMP UPDATE.

     

    WAC 173-26-191

    Agency filings affecting this section

    Master program contents.

    2 The results of shoreline planning are summarized in shoreline master program policies that establish broad shoreline management directives. The policies are the basis for regulations that govern use and development along the shoreline.

    SOME MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES MAY NOT BE FULLY ATTAINABLE BY REGULATORY MEANS DUE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER LEGAL LIMITATIONS ON THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. THE POLICIES MAY BE PURSUED BY OTHER MEANS AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.240.

    SOME DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES A SHORELINE PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

     A LOCAL GOVERNMENT EVALUATES A PERMIT APPLICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES AND REGULATIONS AND APPROVES A PERMIT ONLY AFTER DETERMINING THAT THE DEVELOPMENT CONFORMS TO THEM. EXCEPT

    WHERE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN STATUTE, THE REGULATIONS APPLY TO ALL USES AND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SHORELINE JURISDICTION, WHETHER OR NOT A SHORELINE PERMIT IS REQUIRED, AND ARE IMPLEMENTED THROUGH AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ESTABLISHED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO RCW 90.58.050 and 90.58.140 AND ENFORCEMENT PURSUANT TO RCW

    90.58.210 through 90.58.230.

    ————————————————————-

    If any of you read this complete comment? You understand fully, why I am critical of the two thirds majority of the Advisory Committees that failed to complete their responsibility to the citizens and private property owners of Clallam County on July 10, 2012,  prior to the final SMP Draft Proposal.

    INDEED, THE INTENT OF A PARTY CAN BE DETERMINED BY EXAMINING THE UNDERSTANDING OF A REASONABLE PERSON, AFTER CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE NEGOTIATIONS, ANY PRACTICES THE PARTIES HAVE ESTABLISHED BETWEEN THEMSELVES, USAGES AND ANY SUBSEQUENT CONDUCT OF THE PARTIES.

    IF THE PARTIES DON’T WANT YOU TO DO IT, THE PARTIES WILL MAKE IT AS DIFFICULT AS POSSIBLE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FINANCIALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

    The County Department of Community Development (DCD) has just released a Revised SMP Draft (June 2017). 


  • The Untouchables SES Senior Executives

    The Untouchables SES Senior Executives

    TRUMP AND HIS TRANSITIONAL TEAM ARE DRAINING PART OF THE WA DC.  SWAMP  OF 4000 ALLIGATORS…

    BUT, THAT NUMBER PALES TO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ABOUT 7000 ALLIGATORS (SES) UNTOUCHABLES,  IN  “CIVIL SERVICE”  “UNFIREABLE” AS CIVIL SERVICE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) EMPLOYED AND  ALREADY EMBEDDED IN “CAREER POSITIONS”  IN THE WA DC SWAMP.

    SOMETHING WENT BLATANTLY AMOK IN THE US GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE BETWEEN 1883-2016.

    NOW, WE HAVE  AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHO SHALL BE ACCOUNTABLE

    STEVE BANNON HAS BEEN APPOINTED AS TRUMP’S CHIEF STRATEGIST.

    STEVE SHALL FIND A STRATIGY TO REMOVE THE 7000 UNTOUCHABLES, “UNFIREABLE CIVIL SERVICE” (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES?

    ——————————————————————————–

    JUST ASKING  STEVE,

    AS TRUMP WOULD ASK AMERICA….

    HOW DID THE CIVIL SERVICE SYSTEM, 300 SENIOR EXECUTIVE (SES) IN THE VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION, WORK OUT FOR OUR VETERANS?

    ————————————————————————-

    IT FELL TO A COMMITTEE OF CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS TO FLOG THE TRUTH OUT OF THE ADMINISTRATION, AND IT TOOK MONTHS OF EFFORT:

    THE DEPARTMENT PUNISHED A TOTAL OF EIGHT OF ITS 280,000 EMPLOYEES FOR INVOLVEMENT IN THE DEATH OF 300,000 VETERANS.

    —————————————————————————-

    STEVE SHALL FIND A  STRATIGY TO REMOVE THE 7000 UNTOUCHABLES, “UNFIREABLE CIVIL SERVICE” (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES EMPLOYED AND  ALREADY EMBEDDED IN “CAREER POSITIONS”  IN THE WA DC SWAMP.

    ————————————————————————————

    HISTORY ALWAYS MATTER 1883-2016

    —————————————————————————-

    1883 THE CIVIL SERVICE MERIT SYSTEM

    APPROVED ON JANUARY 16, 1883, THE PENDLETON ACT ESTABLISHED A MERIT-BASED SYSTEM OF SELECTING GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND SUPERVISING THEIR WORK. THE ACT ALSO MADE IT UNLAWFUL TO FIRE OR DEMOTE FOR POLITICAL REASONS EMPLOYEES WHO WERE COVERED BY THE LAW.

    ——————————————————————

    SOMETHING WENT BLATANTLY AMOK IN THE US GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE BETWEEN 1883-2016.

    BY DEFINITION NOV 14, 2016 NOW, WE HAVE TWO GROUPS

    TWO EXCEPTIONS OF THOSE SPECIFICALLY” EXEMPTED BY LAW”

    ————————————————————————

    The United States Civil Service System can be said to be classified into two general types, the Competitive service AND THE EXCEPTED SERVICE. The Competitive service entails all of the civil service jobs and POSITIONS IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH,

     FOR THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE SPECIFICALLY” EXEMPTED BY LAW”,

     THOSE APPOINTED BY THE SENATE,

    AND, THOSE CONSIDERED TO BE IN SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES)

     In this particular civil service system, all applicants are considered to be in competition with other applicants under the  1883  MERIT SYSTEM JANUARY 16, 1883, THE PENDLETON ACT.

    NOW, WE HAVE  AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHO SHALL BE ACCOUNTABLE

    STEVE BANNON HAS BEEN APPOINTED AS TRUMP’S CHIEF STRATEGIST.

    STEVE SHALL FIND A STRATEGY FOR  REMOVING SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES)  “SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY LAW”

    THERE IS NO PLACE IN THE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S GOVERNMENT AGENDA FOR THIS BEHIND OUR BACKS, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS UNTOUCHABLE, UNFIREABLE,  7000 SES SENIOR EXECUTIVES, A CORRUPT, LAYER OF POWER AND GREED IN THE VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION OR ANY OTHER BRANCH OF THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.

    WHICH IMPAIRS THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO SUPERVISE THE EXECUTION OF THE FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE LAWS

     “Section 707 thus vests a federal employee with the final authority —

    UNREVIEWABLE BY ANY POLITICALLY ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

     to determine whether to uphold the removal of a [Department of Veterans Affairs],

    WHICH INCLUDES THE POWER TO OVERRULE THE DECISION OF A CABINET-LEVEL OFFICER,”

    she wrote. “That scheme, WHICH IMPAIRS THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO SUPERVISE THE EXECUTION OF THE FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE LAWS, is inconsistent with the Appointments Clause.”

    INDEED, SOMETHING WENT BLATANTLY AMOK IN THE US GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE BETWEEN 1883-2016.

    Trump says 300,000 veterans died waiting VA care | PolitiFact Virginia

    www.politifact.com/virginia/…/trump-says-300000veteransdies-waiting-va-care/

    Nov 9, 2015 – Donald Trump came to the U.S. Navy stronghold of Norfolk on Halloween … On the VA: “Over 300,000 veterans have died waiting for care”

    TRUMP VOWED TO PROTECT OUR AMERICAN VETERAN’S, UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ARE AT LEAST 300  OF THESE CORRUPT UNTOUCHABLES STILL IN “CAREER POSITIONS”  IN  THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

    ————————————————————-

    FACT CHECK ANYONE…

     VA IG Confirms Worst Fears: 300000 Vets Really Did Die While …

    dailycaller.com/…/va-ig-confirms-worst-fears-300000vets-really-did-die-while-waiti…

    Sep 3, 2015 – Pedestrians walk past the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, May 10, 2013.

    ———————————————————————————-

    INDEED, WE THE PEOPLE ARE DELIGHTED THAT DURING THE GOVERNMENT TRANSITION TRUMP IS DRAINING THE WA DC SWAMP AND REWARDING POLITICAL FRIENDS AND SUPPORTERS WITH 4000 POSITIONS.

     TO THE VICTOR GO THE SPOILS

    In 1828, the “spoils system,”  in which political friends and supporters were rewarded with Government positions, was in full force. The term “spoils system” was derived from the phrase “to the victor go the spoils.” In the years after Jackson’s Presidency, the flaws and abuses in this system were serious. Political appointees were required to spend more and more time and money on political activities. As the Federal bureaucracy grew, Presidents were increasingly hounded by job seekers. In Jackson’s time there were approximately 20,000 Federal employees. By 1884 there were over 130,000. Additionally, with the industrialization of America, Federal jobs became more specialized and required special and specific skills.

    The Pendleton Act transformed the nature of public service. Today many well-educated and well-trained professionals have found a rewarding career in Federal service. When the Pendleton Act went into effect, only 10 percent of the Government’s 132,000 employees were covered. Today (date unknown), more than 90 percent of the 2.7 million Federal employees are covered.

    ———————————————————————–

    SOMETHING WENT BLATANTLY AMOK IN THE US GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE BETWEEN 1883-2016.

    HOW DID THE U.S. GOVERNMENT END UP  WITH 7000 (SES) UNFIREABLE UNTOUCHABLES CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES CHARGED WITH LEADING THE CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT?

    WHO ARE THEY?

    USAJOBS – Senior Executives

    https://www.usajobs.gov/SeniorExecutives/

    THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) IS COMPRISED OF THE MEN AND WOMEN CHARGED WITH LEADING THE CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT. THIS DEDICATED CORPS OF EXECUTIVES SHARES A COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE AND A SET OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES GROUNDED IN THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEALS OF THE CONSTITUTION.

     THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES), POSITIONS INCLUDE POSITIONS CLASSIFIED ABOVE GS-15 THAT INCLUDE DUTIES INVOLVING ONE OR MORE OF THE FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA (EXECUTIVE OR MANAGERIAL)

    YEP, THEY ARE  THOSE SPECIFICALLY” EXEMPTED BY LAW”, IN SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES)

    ——————————————————————————————-

    WHO HIRED  THE 7000 (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES THAT HAVE ALREADY BUILT A FEDERAL CORPORATE CULTURE THAT DRIVES FOR RESULTS, SERVES CUSTOMERS, AND BUILDS SUCCESSFUL TEAMS AND COALITIONS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION.

    ———————————————————————————–

    SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES)

    Guide to Writing Executive Core Qualifications – FAPAC

    EXECUTIVE CORE QUALIFICATIONS (ECQS) ARE THE PRIMARY SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES). WHILE TECHNICAL JOB-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS ARE IMPORTANT, THE ESSENCE OF THE SES IS THE ABILITY TO LEAD.

    ———————————————————————————-

    Executive Core Qualifications – Office of Personnel Management

    https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/…executive…/executivecorequalificatio

    OPM HAS IDENTIFIED FIVE EXECUTIVE CORE QUALIFICATIONS (ECQS). The executive core qualifications define the competencies needed TO BUILD A FEDERAL CORPORATE CULTURE THAT DRIVES FOR RESULTS, SERVES CUSTOMERS, AND BUILDS SUCCESSFUL TEAMS AND COALITIONS WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION.

    ECQ 1: Leading Change · ‎ECQ 2: Leading People · ‎ECQ 3: Results Driven

    ———————————————————————————

    FINALLY THEY MENTION “THE HIRING MANAGERS” IN THAT SCHEME, WHICH IMPAIRS THE PRESIDENT’S ABILITY TO SUPERVISE THE EXECUTION OF THE FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE LAWS

    Preparing Your Federal ECQ’s – Job-Hunt.org

    https://www.job-hunt.org/federal…job…/ECQs-executivecorequalifications.shtml

    Below is a list of the 5 ECQs, along with a description of WHAT HIRING MANAGERS seek in each area. ECQ 1: Leading Change. Organizations are constantly in flux. ECQ 2: Leading People. Leaders in SES positions have responsibility for a large staff. ECQ 3: Results Driven. ECQ 4: Business Acumen. ECQ 5: Building Coalitions.

    ———————————————————————

    WHO ARE THE (SES) UNTOUCHABLES?

    USAJOBS – Senior Executives

    https://www.usajobs.gov/SeniorExecutives/

    THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) IS COMPRISED OF THE MEN AND WOMEN CHARGED WITH LEADING THE CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION OF OUR GOVERNMENT. THIS DEDICATED CORPS OF EXECUTIVES SHARES A COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE AND A SET OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES GROUNDED IN THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEALS OF THE CONSTITUTION.

    ———————————————————————–

    WHO ARE THESE (SES) UNTOUCHABLE INDIVIDUALS?

     USAJOBS Help Center | Senior Executives

    https://www.usajobs.gov/Help/working-in-government/unique…/senior-executives/

    The Senior Executive Service (SES) consists of executive positions, including managerial, supervisory, and policy positions classified above General Schedule …

    ————————————————————————————–

    SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES).

    Guide to Writing Executive Core Qualifications – FAPAC

    EXECUTIVE CORE QUALIFICATIONS (ECQS) ARE THE PRIMARY SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES). WHILE TECHNICAL JOB-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS ARE IMPORTANT, THE ESSENCE OF THE SES IS THE ABILITY TO LEAD.

    ———————————————————————————-

    LOOKING FOR A JOB?

    executive director – USAJOBS – The Federal Government’s Official …

    https://www.usajobs.gov/Search?keyword=%22executive%20director%22

    Jobs 1 – 20 of 20 – The Executive Director provides executive level support…of a National Cemetery. The Executive … Full Time – Senior Executive Service (SES).

    —————————————————————————————-

    WE HAVE  AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHO SHALL BE ACCOUNTABLE

    STEVE BANNON HAS BEEN APPOINTED AS TRUMP’S CHIEF STRATEGIST.

    STEVE SHALL FIND A STRATEGY FOR  REMOVING SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES)  “SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY LAW”

    —————————————————–

    UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP

    NOBODY IS GOING TO BUILD ANYTHING OUTSIDE AND EXEMPT FROM THE LAW

    NOBODY IS GOING TO BE  BUYING OR SELLING OR SERVING CUSTOMERS OUTSIDE AND EXEMPT FROM THE LAW

    NOBODY IS GOING TO BE BUILDING COALITIONS OUTSIDE AND EXEMPT FROM THE LAW

    AND NOBODY IN A GOVERNMENT AGENCY IS GOING TO BE WRITING POLICY OUTSIDE OR  EXEMPT FROM THE LAW,  OUR PRESIDENT, CONGRESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

    WITH TRUMP AS OUR PRESIDENT, NEVER AGAIN SHALL ANY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE RECEIVE A BONUS FOR PUTTING 300,000 AMERICAN VETERAN’S INTO FLAG DRAPED COFFINS. period


  • Trump Rally’s Right Side Broadcasting

    Watch Trump Rally’s LIVE stream 

    And FULL replay of Trump events

    Right Side Broadcasting – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/user/rightsideradio

    LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Albuquerque, NM 10/30/16. … Sunday, October 30 at 7:00 PM MT: Donald J. Trump will hold a rally at Atlantic Aviation located near the Albuquerque International Airport. … LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Grand Rapids, MI 10/31/16.

    Watch Donald Trump Rally Live in Grand Rapids, MI 10/31/16. A Halloween Treat.

    ———————————————————————————-

    Right Side Broadcasting – On The Right Side of History

    rsbn.tv/
    Right Side Broadcasting (RSBN) is a news and opinion site specializing in political news, video and live streaming coverage of political events.

    ———————————————————————-

    Category: Live Events – Right Side Broadcasting

    rsbn.tv/category/video/live-events/

    Donald Trump. WATCH: DONALD TRUMP, MIKE PENCE RALLY IN EAU CLAIRE, WI LIVE STREAM. … WATCH: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN GREELEY, CO LIVE STREAM.

    ————————————————————————

    FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE

    Right Side Broadcasting | Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/rightsidebroadcasting/

    http://rsbn.tv/ … Right Side Broadcasting. 172357 likes · 36209 talking about this. Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN) is a political news broadcasting network…

    A GREAT PLACE TO WATCH TRUMP RALLY’S LIVE

    OR WATCH FULL TRUMP RALLY REPLAYS ANYTIME, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY

    READ THE COMMENTS ON FACEBOOK AND POST YOUR OWN COMMENTS

    I WATCHED THE LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Albuquerque, NM 10/30/16. … Sunday, October 30, 2016.

    IT WAS GREAT.

    —————————————————————————-

    IN CASE YOU MISSED IT….

    How fitting Trump’s Contract to “We the People”  in historic Gettysburg, PA

    Donald J. Trump delivers groundbreaking contract for the American …

    https://www.donaldjtrump.com/…/donald-j.-trump-delivers-groundbreaking-contract-…

    Oct 22, 2016 – “What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again. It is a contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter – and …

    Presents 100-Day Plan To Make America Great Again – For Everyone

    Gettysburg, PA: Today, in historic Gettysburg, PA, Donald J. Trump presented a game-changing plan for his first 100 days in office. This revolutionary “Contract with the American Voter” will ensure that America’s economy is revitalized and citizens are protected.

    “I’m not a politician, and have never wanted to be one. But when I saw the trouble our country was in, I knew I couldn’t stand by and watch any longer. Our country has been so good to me, I love our country, I felt I had to act,” said Mr. Trump in his address.

    “Change has to come from outside this broken system. The fact that the Washington establishment has tried so hard to stop our campaign is only more proof that our campaign represents the kind of change that only arrives once in a lifetime,” he continued.

    “I am asking the American people to rise above the noise and the clutter of our broken politics, and to embrace that great faith and optimism that has always been the central ingredient in the American character. I am asking you to dream big.

    “What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again. It is a contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter – and begins with restoring honesty, accountability and change to Washington,” he concluded.

    DONALD J. TRUMP CONTRACT WITH THE AMERICAN VOTER

    “Therefore, on the first day of my term of office, my administration will immediately pursue the following six measures to clean up the corruption and special interest collusion in Washington, DC:

    • FIRST, propose a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress;
    • SECOND, a hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health);
    • THIRD, a requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated;
    • FOURTH, a 5 year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service;
    • FIFTH, a lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government;
    • SIXTH, a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.

    On the same day, I will begin taking the following seven actions to protect American workers:

    • FIRST, I will announce my intention to renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205
    • SECOND, I will announce our withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
    • THIRD, I will direct my Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator
    • FOURTH, I will direct the Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers and direct them to use every tool under American and international law to end those abuses immediately
    • FIFTH, I will lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of job-producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
    • SIXTH, lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward
    • SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure

    Additionally, on the first day, I will take the following five actions to restore security and the constitutional rule of law:

    • FIRST, cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by President Obama
    • SECOND, begin the process of selecting a replacement for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on my list, who will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States
    • THIRD, cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities
    • FOURTH, begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back
    • FIFTH, suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered extreme vetting.

    Next, I will work with Congress to introduce the following broader legislative measures and fight for their passage within the first 100 days of my Administration:

    1. Middle Class Tax Relief And Simplification Act. An economic plan designed to grow the economy 4% per year and create at least 25 million new jobs through massive tax reduction and simplification, in combination with trade reform, regulatory relief, and lifting the restrictions on American energy. The largest tax reductions are for the middle class. A middle-class family with 2 children will get a 35% tax cut. The current number of brackets will be reduced from 7 to 3, and tax forms will likewise be greatly simplified. The business rate will be lowered from 35 to 15 percent, and the trillions of dollars of American corporate money overseas can now be brought back at a 10 percent rate.

    2. End The Offshoring Act Establishes tariffs to discourage companies from laying off their workers in order to relocate in other countries and ship their products back to the U.S. tax-free.

    3. American Energy & Infrastructure Act. Leverages public-private partnerships, and private investments through tax incentives, to spur $1 trillion in infrastructure investment over 10 years. It is revenue neutral.

    4. School Choice And Education Opportunity Act. Redirects education dollars to gives parents the right to send their kid to the public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school of their choice. Ends common core, brings education supervision to local communities. It expands vocational and technical education, and make 2 and 4-year college more affordable.

    5. Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. Fully repeals Obamacare and replaces it with Health Savings Accounts, the ability to purchase health insurance across state lines, and lets states manage Medicaid funds. Reforms will also include cutting the red tape at the FDA: there are over 4,000 drugs awaiting approval, and we especially want to speed the approval of life-saving medications.

    6. Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act. Allows Americans to deduct childcare and elder care from their taxes, incentivizes employers to provide on-site childcare services, and creates tax-free Dependent Care Savings Accounts for both young and elderly dependents, with matching contributions for low-income families.

    7. End Illegal Immigration Act Fully-funds the construction of a wall on our southern border with the full understanding that the country Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost of such wall; establishes a 2-year mandatory minimum federal prison sentence for illegally re-entering the U.S. after a previous deportation, and a 5-year mandatory minimum for illegally re-entering for those with felony convictions, multiple misdemeanor convictions or two or more prior deportations; also reforms visa rules to enhance penalties for overstaying and to ensure open jobs are offered to American workers first.

    8. Restoring Community Safety Act. Reduces surging crime, drugs and violence by creating a Task Force On Violent Crime and increasing funding for programs that train and assist local police; increases resources for federal law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors to dismantle criminal gangs and put violent offenders behind bars.

    9. Restoring National Security Act. Rebuilds our military by eliminating the defense sequester and expanding military investment; provides Veterans with the ability to receive public VA treatment or attend the private doctor of their choice; protects our vital infrastructure from cyber-attack; establishes new screening procedures for immigration to ensure those who are admitted to our country support our people and our values

    10. Clean up Corruption in Washington Act. Enacts new ethics reforms to Drain the Swamp and reduce the corrupting influence of special interests on our politics.

    On November 8th, Americans will be voting for this 100-day plan to restore prosperity to our economy, security to our communities, and honesty to our government.

    This is my pledge to you.

    And if we follow these steps, we will once more have a government of, by and for the people.”


    View the Contract With The American Voter here


  • Elect Trump What have you got to lose?

    Lose Lying’ Hillary

    Lose the Benghazi liar

    Lose the pay to play Clinton Foundation

    Lose the creeping Crud in the U.S.A.

    Lose the best government money can buy

    Lose the rigged elections

    Lose the super pacts

    Lose the establishments career politicians

    Lose the politicians insider trading

    Lose the politico establishments nepotism

    Lose the politico establishments cronyism

    Lose Obama’s Justice Department

    Lose the FBI’s run and hide

    Lose the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    Lose the global money control of BIS’s and ECC

    Lose the Global  too big to fail Federal Reserve

    Lose the rigged, lying partisan politico news media

    Lose the sanctuary cities

    Lose the open borders

    Lose the criminal  immigrants first

    Lose the revolving door

    Lose the press one for English

    Lose the lawless disorder

    Lose the illegal foreign immigrants invading our country

    Lose the ISIS radicalization in American prisons.

    Lose Shari law upheld in the American Judicial system

    Lose Appointed Judges

    Lose lying’ non-partisan candidates

    Lose the illegal immigrants that are stealing American jobs

    Lose the WRAP immigration program

    Lose the burkas

    Lose poverty in America

    Lose the homeless crisis in America

    Lose hunger in America

    Lose the long lines at community food banks

    Lose America’s crumbling infrastructure

    Lose corrupt establishment politicians

    Lose lead poisoned drinking water

    Lose the Criminal Catch and Release program

    Lose the alien killers, rapist

    Lose the cop Killers

    Lose the Mexican Cartel Heroin

    Lose the Mexican drug lords

    Lose the drug dealing Gangs

    Lose the horrific Mexican Heroin epidemic

    Lose the radical Islamic terrorists

    Lose the workplace beheading violence

    Lose the killing in gun free zones

    Lose the drive by killers

    Lose Obamacare

    Lose the $6000.00 Obamacare deductible

    Lose the greedy pharmaceutical  companies

    Lose the legally prescribed overdosing of opiate dependency

    Lose the drugging of American toddlers thru teens

    Lose the pills that kill in school shootings

    Lose Obama’s executive orders

    Lose Common core (indoctrination) education

    Lose the propaganda of non-traditional taught to American school kids

    Lose the bad trade deals

    Lose the establishment that plays while we pay

    Lose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    Lose the business killing rules and regulations

    Lose the taxes, tolls and fees

    Lose the working poor

    Lose the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

    Lose Global NGO sue and settle

    Lose America’s  slavery to the United Nations

    Lose the UN Hague decision

    Lose the taxpayer cash funding of terrorist country’s

    Lose the $20 Trillion Dollar National Debt

    Lose the liberals deep pockets credit cards

    Lose the UN Global Climate Change program

    Lose the taxpayers foreign aid program

    Lose the Veteran’s Abuse (VA) program

    Lose Obama’s  executive orders  Public land Grabs

    Lose Obama’s  monumental  landgrabbing  frenzy

    Lose the UNESCO control of American Public Land

    Lose the NGO Trusts that Grab Public land

    Lose the grants that fund Global NGO’S

    Lose the Agenda 21 Globalists agenda

    Lose the New World Order

    —————————————————-

    I’m voting for Trump

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Constructional Rights

    We the People shall NOT Lose our second Amendment Right

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Declaration of Independence

    We the People shall NOT Lose our America’s sovereignty

    Behind our backs behind closed doors

    ———————————————–

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the people shall have a government of the people, by the people and for the people

    And, we the people shall have one nation under God with liberty and justice for all


  • C-Span July 12, 2016 AG Lynch Testified?

    C-Span July 12, 2016 AG Lynch Testified?

    10:07 am ET Approx. 2 hr. 26 min. House Judiciary Committee LIVE Justice Department Oversight Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified at an oversight hearing on Justice Department …

    SHE WOULD NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABOUT THE FBI’S INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON’S USE OF PRIVATE EMAIL SERVERS WHILE SERVING AS SECRETARY OF STATE, SAYING THAT MAKING PUBLIC COMMENTS ABOUT EVIDENCE GATHERED DURING THE INQUIRY WOULD BE IMPROPER.

    ———————————————

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s  Dept. of  JUSTICE?

    One Nation Under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all?

    YOU WATCH…. you decide…..

    —————————————————–

    Justice Department Oversight, Part 1

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified at an oversight hearing on Justice Department Operations. She would not…

    Justice Department Oversight Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified at an oversight hearing on Justice Department Operations.

    http://www.c-span.org/video/?412357-1/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-testifies-capitol-hill

    More Videos From

    HSE Judiciary – Justice Dept Oversight

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s  DEPT. OF  JUSTICE?

    One Nation Under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all

    YOU WATCH…. YOU DECIDE

    ———————————————————-

    People in this video

    More People

    Hosting Organization

    More Videos From

    HSE Judiciary – Justice Dept Oversight

    More information about

    Justice Department Oversight

    Related Video

    November 17, 2015

    Department of Justice Oversight

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified at an oversight hearing on Justice Department operations. Topics…

    July 8, 2016

    Attorney General Lynch on Dallas Police Killings

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch condemned the fatal shootings of five Dallas police officers and called on Americans to…

    June 24, 2016

    Criminal Justice Reform

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch & the secretaries for labor, housing & education talked about the challenges former…

    June 14, 2016

    Loretta Lynch Remarks at United State of Women Summit

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch spoke at the White House United State of Women summit. Regarding the June 12 mass…

    ———————————————————-

    User Created Clips from This Video

    One Nation Under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all?

    July 12, 2016

    USE THESE LINKS TO WATCH VIDEOS

    Rep. Sensenbrenner Questions AG Loretta Lynch

      • 6 minutes
      • 25 views

    July 12, 2016

    fasdfa

      • 10 minutes
      • 20 views

    July 12, 2016

    Rep. Smith Questions AG Loretta Lynch

      • 4 minutes
      • 3 views

    July 12, 2016

    Lynch puts her foot in her mouth.

      • 4 minutes
      • 0 views

    The bottom line…

    Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s  DEPT. OF  JUSTICE?

    One Nation Under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all?

    YOU WATCH…. YOU DECIDE


  • Politics is the Gizzard of Society

    “Civil Disobedience.” 1849.

    “Politics is the gizzard of society, full of grit and gravel, and the two political parties are its opposite halves – sometimes split into quarters – which grind on each other. Not only individuals but states have thus a confirmed dyspepsia.”

    Henry David Thoreau wrote the essay “Civil Disobedience in 1849” to discuss his criticisms of the American government. Thoreau writes about his dislike of the government’s power and rule over the people, his hatred of taxation, and his disbelief in a large government that interferes with the rights of the American citizen. This essay is used as a source to help determine Thoreau’s political stance because it provides accurate information about Thoreau’s personal and political beliefs.

    Henry D.Thoreau, would be considered a Republican in today’s political viewpoints

    Confirmed dyspepsia  by definition early 18th century: via Latin from Greek duspepsia, from duspeptos ‘DIFFICULT TO DIGEST.’

    ———————————————————————-

    AUGUST 8, 2015. TRUMP TWEETED “SO MANY “POLITICALLY CORRECT” FOOLS IN OUR COUNTRY. WE HAVE TO ALL GET BACK TO WORK AND STOP WASTING TIME AND ENERGY ON NONSENSE!”

    Thoreau, Henry D. “Civil Disobedience.” 1849.
     “Write while the heat is in you. The writer who postpones the recording of his thoughts uses an iron which has cooled to burn a hole with. He cannot inflame the minds of his audience.”

    ———————————————————————————

    ‘DIFFICULT TO DIGEST IN 2016?  SO MANY “POLITICALLY CORRECT” FOOLS IN OUR COUNTRY?

    —————————————————————

    MAY 21, 2016

    THE STATE CONVENTION, DREW MORE THAN 1,600 WA STATE REPUBLICAN DELEGATES TO PASCO’S TRAC CENTER

    CRUZ BACKERS VOTED IN A SLATE OF “THEIR OWN PREFERRED DELEGATES” TO SEND TO CLEVELAND.

    Washington state GOP convention backs Cruz over Trump | The …

    www.seattletimes.com/…/washingtonstategopconventionbackscruz

    The Seattle Times May 21, 2016 – Donald Trump may be the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, but Washington state’s GOP convention awarded 40 out of 41  to Ted Cruz…

    INDEED,  TEXAS SENATOR WAS AWARDED 40 OF THE 41 ELECTED DELEGATE SLOTS EVEN THOUGH CRUZ HAD DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE.

    TRUMP’S STATE CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN, STATE SEN. DON BENTON R-VANCOUVER WAS DENIED  A NATIONAL DELEGATE SLOT.

    ————————————————————-

    ‘DIFFICULT TO DIGEST FOR VOTERS  IN 2016? SO MANY “POLITICALLY CORRECT” FOOLS IN OUR COUNTRY?

    “Fools make feasts and wise men eat them.”
    Benjamin Franklin,

    “Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools that don’t have brains enough to be honest.”
    Benjamin Franklin

    ————————————————————

    RIGGED ELECTION SYSTEM?

    APRIL 4, 2016  Trump wrote: “I, for one, am not interested in defending a system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club – the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests –grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.”
    trump-gets-poll-bounce-after-rigged-election-protest

    ———————————————————————–

    APRIL 30, 2016

    Just saying..,  I received a phone call from Senator Benton the WA State Chairman for Trump. He was looking for a Clallam County WA State Trump Chairperson.

    I am the Trump Campaign Chair for Clallam County.

    “I, for one, am not interested in SUPPORTING  a RIGGED system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club – the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests –grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.”

    “It doesn’t pain so much seeing one who can’t or don’t understand often the right points of others

     AS MUCH UNDERSTANDING A PERSON WHO OUT OF OWN SELFISHNESS, EITHER IGNORANTLY OR INTENTIONALLY, OFTEN SUPPORTS THE WRONG PEOPLE.”

    “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ― Winston S. Churchill

    —————————————————————————-

    We are Informed. Silent-Angry and Voting

    Posted on May 2, 2016 5:27 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    The  WA State Primary in 2016, is anything but, establishment campaign politicking as usual.

    Thanks to the media and the power of cyberspace technology , Americans, WA State,  voters have been informed by the candidates, we have watched the rally’s on TV, we  have watched the twitter’s, the tweets, face book and of course the establishment pundits.

    In the WA State Primary in 2016, it’s not about your voice.  IT’S  ABOUT YOUR VOTE.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    Just saying…

    “For what it’s worth … it’s never too late, or in my case too early, to do whoever, or whatever you want to do. There’s no time limit. Start whenever you want. You can change or stay the same. There are no rules to this thing. You can make the best or the worst of it. I hope you make the best of it.

    1849 -2016 “The man who goes alone can start today; but he who travels with another must wait until that other is ready, and it may be a long time before they get off.”

    ——————————————————————–

    Paul Ryan finally, begrudgingly endorses Donald Trump — Quartz

    qz.com/698263/paul-ryan-finally-begrudgingly-endorses-donald-trump/

    2 days ago – Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has endorsed Donald Trump, but he doesn’t seem to be enjoying it very much. In an op-ed published in his …

    —————————————————————————

    MAY 23, 2016

    WAS  I POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR DOCUMENTING AND POSTING THE TRUTH?

    Behind My Back | Is Donald J. Trump Politically Incorrect?

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/05/23/trump-is-politically-incorrect/

    May 23, 2016AM I POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR POSTING THIS? “THE TRUTH … Donald Trump May 19 2016 Crooked Hillary Barking Like a Dog … ▷ 0:31.

    ——————————————————————————-

    MAY 25, 2016

    WA STATE PRIMARY VOTE OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE GAVE 44 DELEGATES TO DONALD J. TRUMP.

    Trump wins Washington state’s presidential primaries – CBS News

    www.cbsnews.com/…/donald-trump-wins-republican-presidential-primary-i…

    CBS News May 25, 2016 – Donald Trump handily won Washington state’s Republican … Trump took a commanding lead with 76 percent of the vote, followed by John …

    ————————————————————————-

    Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump May 24

    Thank you Washington! #Trump2016

    Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump May 25

    Thank you Washington! Honored to say, on behalf of our great movement, we have broken the all time record for votes in GOP primary history.

    https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump?lang=en&lang=en

    ——————————————————————-

    Indeed, whether it is Thoreau, Henry D. “Civil Disobedience.” politics in 1849.

    or the contentious  2016 Presidential election process……..

    “Politics is the gizzard of society, full of grit and gravel, and the two political parties are its opposite halves – sometimes split into quarters – which grind on each other. Not only individuals but states have thus a confirmed dyspepsia.”

    ——————————————————————-

    1849- 2016  “Write while the heat is in you. The writer who postpones the recording of his thoughts uses an iron which has cooled to burn a hole with. He cannot inflame the minds of his audience.”

    “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ― Winston S. Churchill

    Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter

    ACT PRESIDENTIAL?

    I THINK NOT…

    TRUMP SUPPORTERS ARE NOT GOING TO BE SWAYED BY MEDIA REPORTS ON TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENTS ABOUT MUSLIMS AND MEXICANS, PAST BEHAVIOR WITH WOMEN, OR EXPERTS DISMISSING HIS POLICIES AS POTENTIALLY DISASTROUS.

    IN TRUMP THEY TRUST, NO MATTER WHAT.

    WE LOVE YOU JUST THE WAY YOU ARE

    —————————————————————————–

    Trump Crowd Versus Hillary Crowd | PoliticalJack.com

    www.politicaljack.com600 × 450Search by image

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201…-to-half-empty-room-at-new-hampshire-college/ And then there’s a Trump crowd:

    —————————————————————

    BREAKING=> DONALD TRUMP Breaks Elton John’s Record at Louisiana Arena – 12,000 at Rally! – The Gateway Pundit

    www.thegatewaypundit.com600 × 450Search by image

    REPUBLICAN DONALD TRUMP spoke to 12,000 supporters Thursday night at the River Center in Baton Rouge. Donald Trump broke the attendance record set by Elton John by 4,000 people.

    Clinton ‘lied’ to Benghazi families | TheHill

    thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/…/266795-bush-clinton-lied-to-benghazi-familie
    The Hill

    Jan 23, 2016 – “This is the third anniversary of Hillary Clinton’s testimony when she said it doesn’t make a difference on Benghazi.

    May 8, 2013 – June 3, 2016 “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”

    ————————————————————————-

    How Hillary Clinton Loses to Donald Trump – POLITICO Magazine

    www.politico.com/…/2016/…/2016-election-hillary-clinton-campaign-loses-de…
    Politico

    May 27, 2016 – Donald Trump can actually win if Clinton makes these four mistakes. … there is a big difference between 2008 and 2016: Then, Clinton’s so-called ….

    The “Hillary Clinton lying for 13 Minutes Straight” video has now gone …

    ——————————————————————————–

    THE FOLLOWING IS POLITICALLY INCORRECT…

    Large Crowd of supporters waiting for Hillary to speak …

    www.pinterest.com477 × 358Search by image

    Large Crowd of supporters waiting for Hillary to speak

  • Hillary’s High Crimes and Misdemeanors?

    Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    by Jon Roland, Constitution Society

    —————————————————-

    Posted under my right to freedom of speech

    Just asking? Just saying…

    What’s going on with the FBI criminal investigation with Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a home email server? The FBI has been quiet, but now we have learned it’s for good reason! As sources inform Fox News’ Catherine Herridge (below), Hillary Clinton is about to be in serious trouble!

     As Rep. Mike Pompeo, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News:

    “I can assure you the intelligence committee is working on determining the scope of any breaches that may have resulted from the improper handling of classified information, and the damage assessments that go with them. I think we all understand that we had classified information in channels that weren’t secure on Secretary Clinton’s homebrew server and that risk was associated with that.”

    Then, Herridge explains how her sources are focused on how “federal regulations require damage assessments after classified information is outside secure government channels, such as a personal server.”

    Therefore, if Pompeo is correct, then the FBI is focused on determining internally what classified information was mishandled… Which it clearly was, as the documents included more than 22 emails that were “top secret and above.” Once that is investigation is complete, the FBI will have no other choice but to go after Hillary Clinton.

    —————————————————————

    “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    Posted on April 16, 2014 3:54 pm by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    by Jon Roland, Constitution Society

    ——————————————————————————————————-

    The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”.

    I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word “high”. It does not mean “more serious”. It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under

    and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

    Under the English common law tradition, crimes were defined through a legacy of court proceedings and decisions that punished offenses not because they were prohibited by statutes, but because they offended the sense of justice of the people and the court. Whether an offense could qualify as punishable depended largely on the obligations of the offender, and the obligations of a person holding a high position meant that some actions, or inactions, could be punishable if he did them, even though they would not be if done by an ordinary person.

    Offenses of this kind survive today in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It recognizes as punishable offenses such things as perjury of oath, refusal to obey orders, abuse of authority, dereliction of duty, failure to supervise, moral turpitude, and conduct unbecoming. These would not be offenses if committed by a civilian with no official position, but they are offenses which bear on the subject’s fitness for the duties he holds, which he is bound by oath or affirmation to perform.

    Perjury is usually defined as “lying under oath”. That is not quite right. The original meaning was “violation of one’s oath (or affirmation)”.

    The word “perjury” is usually defined today as “lying under oath about a material matter”, but that is not its original or complete meaning, which is “violation of an oath”. We can see this by consulting the original Latin from which the term comes. From An Elementary Latin Dictionary, by Charlton T. Lewis (1895), Note that the letter “j” is the letter “i” in Latin.

    periurium, i, n,, a false oath, perjury. periurus, adj., oath-breaking, false to vows, perjured. iuro, avi, atus, are, to swear, take an oath. iurator, oris, m., a swearer. iuratus, adj., sworn under oath, bound by an oath. ius, iuris, that which is binding, right, justice, duty. per, … IV. Of means or manner, through, by, by means of, … under pretense of, by the pretext of, ….

    By Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, the president must swear: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” He is bound by this oath in all matters until he leaves office. No additional oath is needed to bind him to tell the truth in anything he says, as telling the truth is pursuant to all matters except perhaps those relating to national security. Any public statement is perjury if it is a lie, and not necessary to deceive an enemy.

    When a person takes an oath (or affirmation) before giving testimony, he is assuming the role of an official, that of “witness under oath”, for the duration of his testimony.

    That official position entails a special obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and in that capacity, one is punishable in a way he would not be as an ordinary person not under oath. Therefore, perjury is a high crime.

    An official such as the president does not need to take a special oath to become subject to the penalties of perjury. He took an oath, by Art. II Sec. 1 Cl. 8, to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States” and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” to the best of his ability. While he holds that office, he is always under oath, and lying at any time constitutes perjury if it is not justified for national security.

    Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr erred in presenting in his referral only those offenses which could be “laid at the feet” of the president. He functioned like a prosecutor of an offense against criminal statutes that apply to ordinary persons and are provable by the standards of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”. That is not to say that such offenses are not also high crimes or misdemeanors when committed by an official bound by oath. Most such offenses are. But “high crimes and misdemeanors” also includes other offenses, applicable only to a public official, for which the standard is “preponderance of evidence”. Holding a particular office of trust is not a right, but a privilege, and removal from such office is not a punishment. Disablement of the right to hold any office in the future would be a punishment, and therefore the standards of “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” would apply before that ruling could be imposed by the Senate.

    It should be noted, however, that when an offense against a statute is also a “high crime or misdemeanor”, it may be, and usually is, referred to by a different name, when considered as such. Thus, an offense like “obstruction of justice” or “subornation of perjury” may become “abuse of authority” when done by an official bound by oath. As such it would be grounds for impeachment and removal from office, but would be punishable by its statutory name once the official is out of office.

    An executive official is ultimately responsible for any failures of his subordinates and for their violations of the oath he and they took, which means violations of the Constitution and the rights of persons.

    It is not necessary to be able to prove that such failures or violations occurred AT HIS INSTIGATION OR WITH HIS KNOWLEDGE, to be able, in Starr’s words, to “lay them at the feet” of the president. It is sufficient to show, on the preponderance of evidence, that the president was aware of misconduct on the part of his subordinates, OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN, and failed to do all he could to remedy the misconduct, including termination and prosecution of the subordinates and compensation for the victims or their heirs.

    The president’s subordinates include everyone in the executive branch, and their agents and contractors. It is not limited to those over whom he has direct supervision. He is not protected by “PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY”. He is legally responsible for everything that everyone in the executive branch is doing.

     

    Therefore, the appropriate subject matter for an impeachment and removal proceeding is the full range of offenses against the Constitution and against the rights of persons committed by subordinate officials and their agents which have not been adequately investigated or remedied.

    The massacre at Waco, the assault at Ruby Ridge, and many, many other illegal or excessive assaults by federal agents, and the failure of the president to take action against the offenders, is more than enough to justify impeachment and removal from office on grounds of dereliction of duty.

    To these we could add the many suspicious incidents that indicate covered up crimes by federal agents, including the suspicious deaths of persons suspected of being knowledgeable of wrongdoing by the president or others in the executive branch, or its contractors.

    The impeachment and removal process should be a debate on the entire field of proven and suspected misconduct by federal officials and agents under this president, and if judged to have been excessive by reasonable standards, to be grounds for removal, even if direct complicity cannot be shown.

    Home » Selection & Removal » Impeachment
    Original URL: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm | Text Version
    Maintained: Jon Roland of the Constitution Society
    Original date: 1999/01/1616 —  Last updated: 2013/8/30

     

    This entry was posted in FREEDOM OF SPEECH, Government Accountability, Hello Congress is anybody home?, IGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE, Oath To Defend The US Constitution, Politically Ignored.


  • Is Donald J. Trump Politically Incorrect?

    FOR TELLING THE TRUTH

    FOR EXPOSING THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND MEDIA PUNDITS SPEAKING AND REPEATING (AND REPEATING AND REPEATING) UNTRUTHS TO SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION AND POLICY.

    IF TELLING THE TRUTH, TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, A RIGGED PRIMARY ELECTION SYSTEM, EXPOSING THE LIES, LEFT OR RIGHT, RIGHT OR WRONG, IS POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR AN AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

     I STAND WITH DONALD J. TRUMP.

    AM I POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR POSTING THIS?

    “The truth is more important than the facts.”
    Frank Lloyd Wright

    “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
    John Adams, The Portable John Adams

    ———————————————

    Hillary: I’m Not Lying, So The Benghazi Families Must Be – Guy Bensontownhall.com/…/hillary-im-not-lying-so-the-benghazi-families-must-be…

    Townhall.com

    Posted: Jan 04, 2016 10:25 AM

    – He said she then told George Stephanopoulos that she didn’t tell the families the attack was a demonstration about a film. “Somebody is lying,” …

    Hillary: I’m Not Lying, So The Benghazi Families Must Be

    ———————————————————————

    Video Hillary Clinton Barks At Her Own Lies During Speeches | The …

    dailycaller.com/…/watch-dog-lie-watch-dogbarkh

    The Daily Caller
    Feb 17, 2016

    Watch Dog Lie, Watch Dog Bark: Hillary Fact Checks Her Own … (VIDEO: Hillary Barks Like A Dog While …

    Donald Trump May 19 2016 Crooked Hillary Barking Like a Dog …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMZqS7q7voY
    Mar 16, 2016 – Uploaded by dp_video_content

    Why is Hillary Clinton barking like a dog? Donald Trump is going to completely destroy Hillary Clinton in …

    ——————————————————————————-

    The 6 Biggest Lies About Benghazi – Breitbart

    www.breitbart.com/…/05/…/the-6-biggest-lies-about-benghazi
    Breitbart News Network

    May 2, 2014 – Here, then, are the top six top lies told by the White House with regard to the … President Obama Called The Benghazi Attacks Terrorist Attacks.

    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Did All She Could To Protect State Department Personnel. In her now-infamous testimony before Congress, Clinton shouted, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” with reference to the source and rationale for the attacks. Obviously, it made a difference to the White House, which wanted focus on the YouTube video rather than on “broader foreign policy” issues.

    Hillary has never answered where exactly she was that night. According to Hicks,

    after speaking briefly with Hillary Clinton at 2 a.m. on the night of the attacks, she never called back to find out the latest developments.

    Barack Obama, too, is absent from the Benghazi story; we now know he never entered the Situation Room.

    ————————————

    Hillary Clinton Ad – 3 AM White House Ringing Phone – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yr7odFUARg
    May 15, 2008 – Uploaded by Geekylife

    Hillary was not there to take the 3am call on Benghazi”

    Just saying… Just asking?

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

    TRUMP is  the front-runner in the 2016 REPUBLICAN  presidential primaries,

    YOUR VOTE IN NOV. 2016 WILL DECIDE WHO ANSWERS THAT CALL

    ———————————————————————————

    Hillary Clinton & Obama — Benghazi Lies Pile Up | National Review …

    www.nationalreview.com/article/…/hillary-clinton-obamabenghazili
    National Review

    Oct 29, 2015Hillary Clinton and Obama’s Lies on Benghazi — Too Many to Count, but Let’s Try. … They lied about the slaughter of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, at the hands of al-Qaeda-tied terrorists. … Although I am a confirmed and consistent critic of Hillary and Obama, I long had cut …

    ———————————————————————————

    13 Hours Confirms Obama’s and Hillary Clinton’s Lies about Benghaziwww.nationalreview.com/…/13-hours-movie-benghazi-obama-hillary…

    National Review

    Jan 21, 2016 – Beyond the lies that it illustrates, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi very effectively captures the heartache of watching deserted …

    ———————————————————————————

    IF TELLING THE TRUTH, TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, A RIGGED PRIMARY ELECTION SYSTEM, EXPOSING THE LIES, LEFT OR RIGHT, RIGHT OR WRONG, IS POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR AN AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

     I STAND WITH DONALD J. TRUMP.

     —————————————————————-

    10 Big Fat Lies and the Liars Who Told Them | BillMoyers.com

     billmoyers.com/content/10bigfatlies-and-the-liars-who-toldthem/
    Bill D. Moyers
     JUST 2009-1950

    From  Obamacare to weapons of mass destruction, the powers that be have told us some real whoppers over the years.

    No list of the most influential or dangerous liberals in the media is complete without Bill Moyers. Moyers is retired, but liberal journalists never really go away.Investigative journalist Chuck Lewis joined Bill recently to discuss his new book, 935 Lies: The Future of Truth and the Decline of America’s Moral Integrity,

    THAT LOOKS AT THE HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND MEDIA PUNDITS SPEAKING AND REPEATING (AND REPEATING AND REPEATING) UNTRUTHS TO SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION AND POLICY.

    1. President Barack Obama on health insurance plans

    “If you like the [health care] plan you have, you can keep it.”

    President Barack Obama, June 6, 2009 (similarly stated numerous times)

    ———————————————————————

    2. President George W. Bush on weapons of mass destruction

    “We found the weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq]. We found biological laboratories.”

    President George W. Bush, May 29, 2003

    ———————————————————————————————-

    3. Vice President Dick Cheney on weapons of mass destruction

    “Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.”

    Vice President Dick Cheney, August 26, 2002

    —————————————————————————

    4. R.J. Reynolds on the health hazards of cigarettes

    “Cigarette smoking is no more ‘addictive’ than coffee, tea or Twinkies.”

    James W. Johnston, CEO of RJR Nabisco, April 14, 1994

    —————————————————————

    5. President Ronald Reagan on the Iran-Contra scandal

    “In spite of the wildly speculative and false stories of arms for hostages and alleged ransom payments, we did not, repeat, did not, trade weapons or anything else for hostages. Nor will we.”

    President Ronald Reagan, November 13, 1986

    ————————————————————————————-

    6. The Reagan administration on the the El Mozote massacre

    “There is no evidence to confirm that [US-supported El Salvador] government forces systematically massacred civilians in the [El Mozote] operations zone.”

    Assistant Secretary of State Thomas Enders, February 8, 1982

    —————————————————————-

    7. President Richard Nixon on the Watergate break-in

    “I can say categorically that… no one in the White House staff, no one in this administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.”

    President Richard Nixon, discussing the Watergate burglary, August 29, 1972

    ——————————————————————————

    8. President Richard Nixon on covert operations in Chile

    For us to have intervened [in Chile] – intervened in a free election and to have turned it around – I think would have had repercussions all over Latin America…”

    President Richard Nixon, January 4, 1971

    ——————————————————————–

    9. President Lyndon Johnson on the Vietnam War

    “We are not about to send American boys nine or ten thousand miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves.”

    President Lyndon Johnson, October 1964

    In total, 3,403,000 US service members were deployed to Southeast Asia between 1964 and 1975. Roughly 60,000 were killed, and over 150,000 were injured. Millions of Vietnamese, Cambodians and Laotians also died in the war.

    ———————————————————

    10. Senator Joseph McCarthy on communism

    Senator Joseph McCarthy, February 9, 1950

    ————————————

    My comment on truth

    IS ? “The truth is more important than the facts.”
    Frank Lloyd Wright

    Deny, Deny Until They Die: Agent Orange and the Government …

    https://www.creators.com/…/denydeny-until-they-die-agentorang
    Creators Syndicate

    Jun 27, 2015 – So, the U.S. government has finally decided to help some 2,000 Air Force personnel exposed to Agent Orange residue left over in airplanes …

    —————————————————————————-

    The bottom line

    IF TELLING THE TRUTH, TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, A RIGGED PRIMARY ELECTION SYSTEM, EXPOSING THE LIES, LEFT OR RIGHT, RIGHT OR WRONG, IS POLITICALLY INCORRECT FOR AN AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

     I STAND WITH DONALD J. TRUMP.

    TRUMP is  the front-runner in the 2016 REPUBLICAN  presidential primaries,

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

    YOUR VOTE IN NOV. 2016 WILL DECIDE WHO ANSWERS THAT 3:00 AM CALL


  • We are Informed. Silent-Angry and Voting

    We are Informed. Silent-Angry and Voting

    The  WA State Primary in 2016, is anything but, establishment campaign politicking as usual.

    THANKS TO THE MEDIA AND THE POWER OF CYBERSPACE TECHNOLOGY , AMERICANS, WA STATE,  VOTERS HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY THE CANDIDATES, WE HAVE WATCHED THE RALLY’S ON TV, WE  HAVE WATCHED THE TWITTER’S, THE TWEETS, FACE BOOK AND OF COURSE THE ESTABLISHMENT PUNDITS.

    In our small county,  

    We are informed. We are Silent – We are Angry and We are Voting

    ALL OF THE LOCAL PEOPLE I HAVE SPOKEN WITH PRIVATELY, HAVE ALREADY DECIDED WHO THEY ARE VOTING “FOR”…..

    In the WA State Primary in 2016, it’s not about your voice.  IT’S  ABOUT YOUR VOTE.

    May 2, 2016 IT’S TOO LATE FOR A BLITZ OF THE USUAL  ESTABLISHMENT CAMPAIGN POLITICKING

    Historically, business as usual for a  politico establishment’s primary election campaign.  would be to find local volunteers, to find a meeting place, to have meetings, to train, to make thousands of phone calls to thousands of people, and, to post thousands of yard signs.

    ———————————————————-

    April 30, 2016, 2:50 PM  I received a phone call from

    Senator Benton is the WA State Chairman for Trump

    Certainly, I would be delighted to participate locally  in promoting my candidate for the primary.

    In fact I did send an email out April 30, 2016, to my contacts in WA State, for that specific purpose.  to find local volunteers, to find a meeting place, to have meetings, to train, to make thousands of phone calls to thousands of people, and, to post yard signs.

    ——————————————————————————–

    April 30, 2016, 4:02 PM I sent out this email

    Subject: Senator Benton called me.

    ————————————

    Senator Benton called me at 2:50 PM 
    He is the WA State Chairman for Trump.

    He is looking for a Clallam County Trump Chairperson.

    Do you know someone that is a Trump supporter and would be interested in participating?

    Please email or call me (360) 417-9452

    Do you have a LIST of Trump local supporters?

    Short notice,  BUT…. We have a message to get out ASAP.

    The meeting can be arranged for Wed. May 4, or Thurs May 5, 2016

    He has requested a public meeting place for 25 Trump supporters to train them for making phone calls..

    Can you help me find a free public meeting place?

    I’ll keep you posted..

    Trump will be in WA State in Spokane and at Boeing field for rally’s.

    Thank you

    Pearl

    —————————————————————————————–

    May  2, 2016  Keeping you posted

    THE ONLY RESPONSE TO MY EMAIL WAS SILENCE.

    “Go to where the silence is and say something.”

    Indeed, We are informed. We are Silent – We are Angry and We are Voting

    AND, WE HAVE ALREADY DECIDED WHO TO VOTE FOR.

    IN THE WA STATE PRIMARY IN 2016, IT’S NOT ABOUT YOUR VOICE.  IT’S  ABOUT YOUR VOTE.

    TO BE SILENT IS TO SAY SOMETHING

     TO VOTE IS TO DO SOMETHING