+menu-


  • Category Archives Amexit the UN?
  • Scams and Lies to American Citizens

    The WA DC Establishment’s, Democrat and Republican  Scams and Lies to American Citizens

    There is no left or right  there is  just WRONG. period

    SCAM BY DEFINITION a dishonest scheme, a fraud, swindle. cheat, deceive, trick, dupe, hoodwink, double-cross, gull; con, fleece, shaft, hose, sting, bilk, diddle, rook, gyp, finagle, bamboozle, flimflam, , sucker, stiffhornswoggle

    U.S. GOVERNMENT SCAMS ON AMERICAN CITIZEN’S,  BY THEIR VERY NATURE ARE COMMITTED BEHIND MY BACK, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.

    JAN 2009 – 2017 OBAMA’S, DEMOCRAT’S ADMINISTRATION AND HILLARY LIES ARE DOCUMENTED, VIDEO TAPED, LEAKED AND ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, FORCED TO BECOME PUBLIC  BY THE MEDIA.

    LIES TO AMERICAN CITIZENS  HAVE BEEN BALD FACED AND, BOLD FACED, A TERM USED IN REFERENCE TO NEWSPAPER HEADLINES PRINTED IN BOLD FACE TYPE, WHICH ARE OUTRIGHT LIES. SUCH HEADLINES ARE ONLY INTENDED TO SELL NEWSPAPERS, NOT TO PUBLISH TRUTH.

    NOW IN 2017 A BOLD FACED LIE IS REFEREED BY THE PUBLIC MEDIA AS “FALSE NEWS”, NEWSPAPER HEADLINES PRINTED IN BOLD FACE TYPE, WHICH ARE OUTRIGHT LIES. SUCH HEADLINES ARE ONLY INTENDED TO SELL NEWSPAPERS, NOT TO PUBLISH TRUTH.

    JAN 2009 – 2017 NOTICE HOW LYING TO AND SCAMMING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IS COMPLETELY JUSTIFIED BY OBAMA ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS SO LONG AS THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.

    NOTICE HOW HISTORICALLY….

    LYING TO AND SCAMMING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IS COMPLETELY JUSTIFIED BY THE DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENTS,  ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS, SO LONG AS THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.

    ————————————————————————-

    2009-2017 OBAMA’S, DEMOCRAT’S ADMINISTRATION AND HILLARY LIES ARE DOCUMENTED, VIDEO TAPED, LEAKED AND ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, FORCED TO BECOME PUBLIC  BY THE MEDIA.

    The WA DC Establishment’s ETAL. , Democrat and Republican 

    SCAM’S AND OR LIES? YOU DECIDE.

    The (affordable) Obamacare SCAM

    The FALSE NEWS SCAMS

    The election influence SCAM

    The Russians did it SCAM

    Obama’s UN agenda SCAM

    Obama’s Executive Order’s SCAM’S

    Obama’s Memoranda’s SCAM’S

    Obama’s Proclamations SCAMS

    Obama’s Junior Varsity (JV) SCAM

    Obama’s Immigration SCAM

    Obama’s public lands grab SCAM

    Obama’s Cuba SCAM

    The Global Warming SCAM

    The Weather Change SCAM

    The Wild Olympics SCAM

    The Middle East War SCAM

    The weapons of mass destruction SCAM

    The Judgment Fund SCAM

    Obama’s cash to Iran SCAM

    The Sue and Settle SCAM

    The removal of Dam’s  SCAM

    The FEMA  Flood SCAM

    Politician’s insider trading SCAM

    The Clinton Foundation SCAM

    The Pay for Play SCAM

    Hillary’s Uranium to Russia SCAM

    The Non-profit SCAMS

    The tax Exempt NGO SCAMS

    The Shoreline Management Plan SCAM

    The don’t worry it’s a “GRANT” SCAM

    The unfunded mandate SCAM

    The Whistle Blower’s SCAM

    The Veteran’s Administration SCAM

    The EPA policy SCAM

    Obama’s Justice SCAM

    The WOTUS SCAM

    The Agenda 21 SCAM

    The UN Sustainable development SCAM

    ———————————————

    HISTORY ALWAYS MATTERS

    NOTICE HOW HISTORICALLY LYING TO AND SCAMMING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IS COMPLETELY JUSTIFIED BY THE DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN ESTABLISHMENTS,  ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS, SO LONG AS THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.

    ———————————————————–

    POLITICAL INTRODUCTION HISTORY ALWAYS MATTERS

    TECHNOLOGY EXPOSING AND LEAKING THE  PRIVATE UTOPIA OF THOSE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY.

    INDEED, IT WAS WELL RECOGNIZED IN 1954 THAT IT WAS….

    Just a Matter of Time and Money 1790-2016

    Posted on April 28, 2016 8:34 am by Pearl Rains Hewett

    IN 1954 IT WAS WELL RECOGNIZED BY THOSE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY THAT IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME, ONLY A FEW DECADES,

     BEFORE THE GENERAL PUBLIC WOULD BE ABLE TO GRASP AND UPSET THE CRADLE OF POWER,

    FOR THE VERY ELEMENTS OF THE NEW SILENT WEAPON TECHNOLOGY WERE AS ACCESSIBLE FOR A PUBLIC UTOPIA AS THEY WERE FOR PROVIDING A PRIVATE UTOPIA.

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THE GENERAL PUBLIC WOULD BE ABLE TO GRASP AND UPSET THE CRADLE OF POWER

    ————————————————————————-

     INDEED, THE ELECTION OF TRUMP ON NOV 8, 2016 DID UPSET THE CRADLE OF POWER

    IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF A FEW DECADES 1954 TO 2016.

    To be continued….


  • UN Agenda 21 is Anti-American Everything

    THE PERILS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

    Print, 2012 by Rene’ Holaday (Author)

    “The Perils of Sustainable Development” is about “The United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21”, and how Sustainable Development plans to completely abolish things like private property rights, individual rights, air conditioning, driving of vehicles, rural living, meat consumption, livestock ownership, farming, logging, and much much more.

    It is written in a way that makes it an “easy and a quick read” that will provide the reader with an instant basic outline of all the most important facts, so that you don’t have to spend years weeding through endless deceptive government documents and websites!

    Six years of solid research has pulled together a complete picture of what the UN has in store for the United States, and what has already been covertly accomplished in our great nation. It is a compilation of all the most important facts and glaringly incriminating quotes.

    It also supplies the reader with Resolution Templates and blueprint action plans that have already been successful in over 57 cities, counties, and two states in the USA. The reader can use these “blueprints” in order to start putting their own plans of action into progress in their own local areas to put a stop to these UN programs.

    This book is also highly recommended for use by our elected officials, regardless of party affiliation.

    If you enjoy your private property rights and other essential American values, this is a “must have” book that will show you what is going on and what we can do about it!

    When deception has been the central theme of these UN programs, every American needs this information before it is too late for the entire nation.

    It also contains multiple maps that outline affected areas, regional governance, and much more.

    You will need to know- do you even know if you live in an area deemed by the UN to be a “Wildlife Corridor” that will allow little to no human use within the next few years?

    ————————————————

    Rene Holaday has given many years to compiling a seminal work on the
    agenda of the United Nations and its manipulators. We had best take
    notice and work at least as hard as she has and with as much
    dedication, to thwart their efforts at destroying the United States of
    America. Thank you Rene.
    ——————————————-

    Rene Holaday Book Review – The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/quinault/…/Rene%20Holaday%20Book%20Review.html

    review of the perils of sustainable development” … By LMackowiak. Rene Holaday has given many years to compiling a seminal work on the agenda of the …

    7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars

    If you want to EAT, then read and understand this book., May 15, 2012
    By D. T. Jewett “Computer Sleuth” (Northwest Rockies) – See all my reviews
    (REAL NAME)    This review is from: The Perils of Sustainable
    Development (Perfect Paperback)


    This book contains a wealth of information on the U.N. and their
    Agenda-21/sustainable development. It discusses how Agenda-21 came to
    be, the strategies and tactics used to implement it throughout the
    U.S. and the world, and the ramifications for all of us if it is to
    succeed.

    The book could make a stronger case for opposing Agenda-21. Just go
    back to the USSR; to the mass starvation in the Ukraine, and many
    other instances where government has taken control over the means of
    food production, and you’ll see that giving government this kind of
    power is akin to signing our own death warrants.

    History has shown that the greatest prosperity for the largest number
    of people comes about with freedom – and that every time freedom is
    constrained, there is a comparable loss of prosperity. This is never
    more important than when it comes to private property rights as the
    core of freedom – for if Agenda-21 is fully implemented, you will
    starve – literally!

    I highly recommend this book for those who want clear information on
    the U.N. and their agenda to achieve a one-world government.

    3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars You’ve gotta know this., January 31, 2013
    By Sharon Glatthorn –

    This review is from: The Perils of Sustainable Development (Perfect Paperback)
    If it weren’t for those that do the research and put it out there for
    us, we’d never know what is really going on. I thank Rene’ for all her
    efforts.

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars The Perils of Sustainable Development, January 25, 2013
    By Linda J Horsley –

    This review is from: The Perils of Sustainable Development (Perfect Paperback)
    The book was excellent. It took her six years of research. Everyone
    should read this book. A great deal of information is given to expose
    the UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development with websites included to
    back up her information.

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars The Perils of Sustainable Development, January 6, 2013
    By LMackowiak

    Rene Holaday has given many years to compiling a seminal work on the
    agenda of the United Nations and its manipulators. We had best take
    notice and work at least as hard as she has and with as much
    dedication, to thwart their efforts at destroying the United States of
    America. Thank you Rene.

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent and Informative

    Read, November 21, 2012
    By Sue Forde – This review is from: The Perils of Sustainable
    Development (Perfect Paperback)

    This book explains clearly the danger we are facing by way of UN
    Agenda 21 and “Sustainable Development”. It’s a must-read for every
    person who loves our country, and the Constitutional individual
    liberty it has historically offered. That is changing, and you’ll
    learn the reasons why, along with excellent suggestions for action to
    take.

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars The Perils of sustainable Development, November 9, 2012
    By CaroleB “CaroleB” (Seattle, WA) – This review is from: The Perils
    of Sustainable Development (Perfect Paperback)

    The book is well researched and easy to understand for the
    nonpolitical person. If you don’t know anything about the United
    Nations, how it was formed and why, then this is a must read.

    Read how Agenda 21 which has been kept out of the media for years while it has been implemented in towns, cities and school districts across the
    United States, all while the general population has been kept in the
    dark.

    Like an octopus with powerful tentacles we are being choked out
    of having our voices heard,regulations upon regulations applied to our
    daily lives, and we are completely unaware how this is taking place.

    I recommend this for every person in America, and especially for
    teachers in order to reclaim our schools from the purposely dumbed
    down curriculum being handed down from the federal level. They don’t
    need educated people which are harder to control, they need workers.
    Cities and schools, stop taking the federal money, they are
    controlling you with the debt you are accumulating.

    Anytime they want a ‘consensus’ on an issue instead of a vote by the majority, be suspicious! We have been manipulated to be ‘politically correct’, now
    is the time to speak out.


    Every solider who thinks they are serving America needs to read this
    book, and know their services are in fact being indirectly directed by
    the United Nations.

    America is crumbling from within and this easy to
    read book explains how it has all been manufactured for us to fail.
    The tentacles have grown long and strong while Americans have been
    asleep, can we awake in time?

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars Perils of Sustainable Development, October 22, 2012
    By Karl Spees, MD (retired) – This review is from: The Perils of
    Sustainable Development (Perfect Paperback)
    The Perils of Sustainable Development by Rene’ Holaday

    In 2010 our study group consulted Rene’ Holaday when we were
    struggling to understand the `why’s’ behind some of the current
    self-destructive U.S. governmental policies.

    Rene’ Holaday’s extensive research is reflected in her 2012 book, The
    Perils of Sustainable Development. Despite being encyclopedic in
    scope, it was/is an easy read. As you zip thru the chapters, the book
    provides the missing pieces of the puzzle and connects the dots of the
    surreptitious convoluted United Nations Agenda to establish an all
    powerful one world government.

    Completing Rene’s excellent work is the equivalent of taking a
    university level course on UN Agenda 21. Personally, I have purchased
    multiple copies of Rene’s book as loaner copies which are well
    received.

    The UN Agenda 21 represents an under appreciated danger to our U.S.
    Constitutional Republic and the American Dream. Only by core groups of
    responsible, proactive citizens educating themselves on this
    pernicious covert scheme of the radical Globalists, will we disrupt
    this malignant threat to our God given rights and freedoms.

    Karl Spees, MD (retired) Concerned American

    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars A must read – and a great gift idea, August 15, 2012
    By Jim in Seattle “Jim” (Seattle, USA) The Perils of Sustainable
    Development (Perfect Paperback)

    This book is well researched and easy to read. It spells out the truth
    about UN Agenda 21 and what the environmental left has been doing to
    strip away our rights as Americans.

    Many people don’t know about this destructive international effort to
    control our land, our water and our population, but it is real and
    needs to be understood. This is not conspiracy theory stuff. It is
    serious. This book will give you the knowledge to talk intelligently
    about this subject to others. It is also something to consider as a
    gift for others.


    2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars An insidious agenda, August 7, 2012
    By DBred – This review is from: The Perils of Sustainable Development
    (Perfect Paperback)

    Rene exposes what I found when researching why so much time, money and
    effort were being spent to push the blatantly false science of Global
    Warming. Sustainable Development, also known as Agenda 21, has
    tentacles that reach deep into much of our government.
    Environmentalism was the vehicle chosen by the UN to push this agenda
    because it was a common thread amongst all countries of the world. The
    ultimate goal of the agenda has nothing to do with the environment.
    This deceptive agenda has infected our government under both parties
    and must be stopped!
    This is a must read.

    ———————————————————-

    The Perils of Sustainable Development by Rene Holaday – YouTube

    ▶ 1:06:27 Nov 17, 2012

    – Uploaded by WaStateTeaParty

    “The Perils of Sustainable Development is about ” the United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21 …

    ——————————————————————————-

    The Triune That Would Steal Our Liberty | North Western Research …

    Remarks given by Sue Forde to the Republican Women of Clallam County.

    March 11, 2013. Sequim,WA.

    The move to replace our Constitution with the principles behind the Wildlands Project, UN Agenda 21 and The Earth charter is an “American” issue, not a political one.  This agenda affects each and every one of us, stealing our liberty and our rights under the US and WA State Constitutions.

    Article I, Section I of the State Constitution says:The Wildlands Project, UN Agenda 21, and The Earth Charter:

    These three concepts  are The Triune That Would Steal Our Liberty blend together for a common purpose.

    That purpose: To control our lives in every area.

    by definition: Triune consisting of three in one (used especially with reference to the Trinity)

    snippets

    What Can We Do?

    Educate your elected representatives, and put the heat on them at every turn to do the right thing – get rid of these anti-American ideas that have infiltrated our government agencies.  A couple of good books to help in this effort include: Print, 2012  The Perils of Sustainable Development by Rene Holaday, and Behind the Green Mask Publication date: 09/02/2011 by Rosa Koire (who founded Democrats against UN Agenda 21), both available through Amazon.com.

    —————————————————

    Nov 3, 2015The University of California at Davis Library has placed the book, BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: Democrats against UN Agenda 21, in its Political Right Wing Pamphlet Collection.

    Rather than holding the book in its open stacks, the book is for use within the library only, and is held within a larger Radical Pamphlet Collection. This obviously indicates to any student who would read it that the book is considered to be a radical, dangerous, conspiracy book that is only to be read as an example of something that goes against the values of sane, intelligent university-goers. 

    —————————————————————————-

    patriot radio 09/06/2016 – rene’ holaday – REP. MATT SHEA – Podbean

    mattshea.podbean.com/e/patriotradio09062016reneholaday/

    Sep 6, 2016 – REP. MATT SHEAPATRIOT RADIO header image 1. PATRIOT RADIO 09/06/2016 – RENE’ HOLADAY is the author of …THE PERILS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

    ———————————

    The bottom line

    Thank God, Trump was elected president.

    America First

    Americanization Not Globalization


  • Common Core Issues and Actions in Education?

    Common Core Issues and Actions in Education?

    In 2005, Phyllis Schlafly wrote the following “President Reagan withdrew the United States from UNESCO in December of 1984 because it was corrupt, anti-Western, and a vehicle for far-left propaganda.

    Unfortunately, President George W. Bush rejoined UNESCO in 2003, and it’s now found a long sought after means to influence U.S. school curriculum.

    ——————————————————————–

    President Trump’s campaign quotes on American Education 2016, Common Core: “I have been consistent in my opposition to Common Core. Get rid of Common Core.” February 2016

    President Trump, .The government’s role in education: “there’s no failed policy more in need of urgent change than our government-run education monopoly.”September 2016.

    THE GLOBAL UN, UNESCO COMMON CORE EDUCATION, AGENDA 21, MASTER CURRICULUM, CURRENTLY BEING TAUGHT IN  AMERICA’S PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO AMERICAN STUDENTS, IS NOT AN AMERICAN, NATIONALLY CRAFTED OR U.S GOVERNMENT RUN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.

    I have issues with Trump’s pick of  Betsy Devos, for Secretary of Education for the United States of America, it is a red flag  warning that “TRUMP’S AMERICA FIRST” has been side tracked by the conceptual rationalization of a one world order of globalized, education for the common good.

    HOW CAN PRESIDENT TRUMP TWO WORDS “AMERICA FIRST” RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING  COMMON CORE ISSUES AND ACTION IN EDUCATION ?

    —————————————————————————————–

    Common Core Where did it come from?

    PLEASE WATCH THIS RELATED VIDEO: Brilliant anti-Common Core Speech by Dr. Duke Pesta

    THE UNITED NATIONS – UNESCO 1945 – 1949 – 1984 – 2004- 2016

    Below is a historically documented, VERY well written Anti-Common Core comment.

    unedited full text

    Common Core Where did it come from?

    The Right View: Education policy that’s rotten to the core – The …

    www.theforecaster.net/the-right-view-education-policy-thats-rotten-to-the-core/

    Feb 2, 2015 – … “A Methodological Guide to the Application of the Notion of Common Core in the Training of Various Categories of Educational Personnel.

    That’s it. I’m done. I am refusing to allow my children to participate in any Common Core-related assessments, surveys, tests – anything, now that testing has begun in earnest in our schools.

    Here’s why.

    The United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture (UNESCO) was founded in 1945. Its educational objectives are to “support the achievement of Education for All; to provide global and regional leadership in education; to strengthen education systems worldwide from early childhood to the adult years; and to respond to contemporary global challenges through education.”

    As the only United Nations agency with a mandate to cover all aspects of education, UNESCO’s work encompasses educational development from pre-school through higher education, including technical and vocational education and training, non-formal education, and literacy.

    The organization says it focuses on “increasing equity and access, improving quality, and ensuring that education develops knowledge and skills in areas such as sustainable development, HIV and AIDS, human rights and gender equality. UNESCO works with governments and a wide range of partners to make education systems more effective through policy change.” It coordinates the “Education for All movement, tracks education trends and raises the profile of educational needs on global development agendas.”

    So our children are being herded into “global development agendas” that our and other governments deem fit.

    Alex Newman, a correspondent for The New American, noted that in 1949, UNESCO printed a pamphlet on using the classroom to promote “world understanding,” stating, “As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can only produce precarious results.” So, to deal with that, schools should use various means to “combat family attitudes.”

    By 1984, J.C. Pauvert had penned a document for UNESCO’s Division of Higher Education and Training of Educational Personnel entitled “A Methodological Guide to the Application of the Notion of Common Core in the Training of Various Categories of Educational Personnel.” It discusses the origins of “the notion of the common core as a process of transmission of knowledge, skills, or behavior that always involves comparable psychological mechanisms, set in motion by identical intentions, guided by learning objectives, put into practice in accordance with strategies and subjected to procedures of evaluation which are also comparable.”

    In 2005, Phyllis Schlafly wrote the following in Issues and Action in Education: “President Reagan withdrew the United States from UNESCO in December of 1984 because it was corrupt, anti-Western, and a vehicle for far-left propaganda. Unfortunately, President George W. Bush rejoined UNESCO in 2003, and it’s now found a long sought after means to influence U.S. school curriculum.

    “On November 17, 2004 at UNESCO’s headquarters in Paris, UNESCO signed a 26-page, five year Cooperation Agreement with Microsoft Corporation to develop a ‘master curriculum (Syllabus)’ for teacher training in information technologies based on standards, guidelines, benchmarks, and assessment techniques. It states that the Syllabus will ‘form the basis for deriving training content to be delivered to teachers,’ and ‘UNESCO will explore how to facilitate content development.’ UNESCO Director General Matsuura confirmed that one of the Agreement’s goals is to foster content development, and create a worldwide curricula reflecting UNESCO values. No doubt that is agreeable to Bill Gates because the Agreement states that Microsoft supports the objectives of UNESCO.”

    The Gates Foundation then went on to underwrite the organizations that were writing the Common Core standards: the National Governors Association, David Coleman’s Student Achievement Partners, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and Achieve Inc. Those four organizations, primarily responsible for development of the Common Core State Standards, have thus far taken $147.9 million in funding from Bill Gates. And I haven’t even touched on the data collection.

    In 2010, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, gave a speech at UNESCO in Paris entitled “The Vision of Education Reform in the United States,” where he discussed “new partnerships,” which, he stated, “must inspire students to take a bigger and deeper view of their civic obligations – not only to their countries of origin, but to the betterment of the global community. A just and socially responsible society must also be anchored in civic engagement for the public good.”

    Duncan went on to call the governance of education in the United States “unusual,” in that the federal government has had (past tense) a limited role in education policy, and that he and the president have a “cradle-to-career education agenda.” He stated outright that the Obama administration has sought to fundamentally shift the federal role.

    So I’m calling on Gov. Paul LePage to end Maine’s participation in the Common Core State Standards, and to bring back local control.

    In the meantime, state Rep. Sara Gideon, a Freeport Democrat who is the assistant House majority leader, recently told MPBN’s Jay Field that “right now, parents do have an option.” She said a U.S. Supreme Court decision gives parents the right to opt kids out of standardized tests.

    “The issue is that, in Maine, we don’t have anything in state law that makes this clear,” Gideon said. So she is sponsoring a bill that makes it clear, under state law, that parents have this option, and requires teachers and school administrators to let them know about it.

    Rep. Gideon, you are officially my favorite Democrat.

    Sidebar Elements

    Julie McDonald-Smith lives in North Yarmouth. She is a registered nurse, former Capitol Hill staffer and former chairwoman of the Cape Elizabeth Republican Committee. Her column appears every other week.

    —————————————————————————————-

    HOW CAN PRESIDENT TRUMP TWO WORDS “AMERICA FIRST” RESOLVE THE FOLLOWING  COMMON CORE ISSUES AND ACTIONS IN EDUCATION ?

    UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core

    www.thenewamerican.com/…/17925-un-obama-and-gates-are-globalizing-education-…

    Mar 26, 2014 – … “A Methodological Guide to the Application of the Notion of Common Core in the Training of Various Categories of Educational Personnel.

    To be continued…

    How “Radical” is UNESCO Common Core?

    by definition Radical adjective;  advocating or based on thorough or complete political or social reform; representing or supporting an extreme section of a political party.

    by definition Radical: noun,; a person who advocates thorough or complete political or social reform; a member of a political party or part of a party pursuing such aims.


  • EQ vs. IQ? Brexit and President Trump

    EQ vs. IQ?  Brexit the EU  and Trump is President

    How could the experts have been so WRONG?

    BBC The National Dec 4, 2016 10:00PM

    I watched the round table EQ vs. IQ. discussion (of three Canadian, Politico pundits so called IQ media experts?)

    HOW COULD THE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT  (IQ) EXPERTS ETAL. MEDIA AND POLLS HAVE BEEN SO WRONG ABOUT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EQ)?

    Hmmm…. EQ vs. IQ.  Does IQ Beat EQ?

    ————————————————-

    the bottom line…..

    DONALD J. TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, OR EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT (EQ), is defined as an individual’s ability to identify, evaluate, control, and express emotions. PEOPLE WITH HIGH EQ USUALLY MAKE GREAT LEADERS AND TEAM PLAYERS BECAUSE OF THEIR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND, EMPATHIZE, AND CONNECT WITH THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM.

    —————————————————————-

    Oct 16, 2014  While there certainly are studies that find EQ to have little value, and studies that find IQ to be essential, today Google Scholar lists over a hundred thousand studies on emotional intelligence (EQ).

    Oct 16, 2014 |The evidence is growing. The interest in EQ as an important construct is indisputable.

    —————————————————————————————-

    Dec 5, 2016 INDISPUTABLE, INDEED,  BREXIT THE EU AND  TRUMP IS  PRESIDENT

    Emotional Intelligence, or emotional quotient (EQ)

    ————————————————————————————-

    BBC The National Dec 4, 2016 10:00PM

    THE BBC NATIONAL, EQ VS. IQ. DISCUSSION WAS SO “INSULTING” IT DEMANDED THIS POSTING ON MY WEBSITE.

    HOW STUNNING… HOW SHOCKING…. BREXIT THE EU – TRUMP IS  PRESIDENT

    BLAME IT ON THE MILLIONS  OF EMOTIONAL? LOW IQ?  UNEDUCATED? CITIZENS THAT  VOTED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM FOR BREXIT.

    BLAME IT ON MILLIONS OF EMOTIONAL? LOW IQ?  UNEDUCATED BLUE COLLAR,  DEPLORABLE IRREDEEMABLE AMERICAN CITIZENS THAT VOTED FOR TRUMP IN THE USA.

    ————————————————————————————–

    YEP… THE (IQ) EXPERTS ETAL. MEDIA AND POLLS WERE STUNNINGLY WRONG, ABOUT THE  MILLIONS  OF LOW IQ?  UNEDUCATED? EMOTIONAL CITIZENS THAT  VOTED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM FOR BREXIT.

     YEP, AND THE IQ EXPERTS ETAL. MEDIA AND POLLS WERE STUNNINGLY WRONG  ABOUT THE  MILLIONS OF LOW IQ?  UNEDUCATED BLUE COLLAR,  EMOTIONAL DEPLORABLE IRREDEEMABLE CITIZENS THAT VOTED FOR TRUMP IN THE USA.

    ————————————————————————————

    ‘WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE?’ USING THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION:

    “THE WHOLE OF COGNITIVE OR INTELLECTUAL ABILITIES REQUIRED TO OBTAIN KNOWLEDGE, AND TO USE THAT KNOWLEDGE IN A GOOD WAY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS THAT HAVE A WELL DESCRIBED GOAL AND STRUCTURE.”

    SO WHAT IS IQ? INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT. THE IQ IS A MEASUREMENT OF YOUR INTELLIGENCE AND IS EXPRESSED IN A NUMBER.

    —————————————————————————

    MILLIONS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS VOTED FOR TRUMP

    —————————————————————————————-

    OF COURSE IT WOULD BE POLITICALLY INCORRECT TO MENTION THE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT  (IQ) AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EQ) OF HILLARY VOTERS.

    ————————————————————————

    Is Emotional Intelligence Overrated? Forget IQ versus EQ – Six Seconds

    www.6seconds.org/2014/10/16/emotionalintelligence-overrated/

    Oct 16, 2014 – Framing this as “IQ versus EQ” demonstrates neither. At any meeting, any dinner table conversation, it’s obvious that these aspects of …

    GOOGLE SCHOLAR LISTS OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND STUDIES ON EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EQ).

    ———————————————————————————

    Scholarly articles for emotional intelligence. imagination cognition and personality

    … and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence – ‎Schutte – Cited by 2667

    SNIPPET 1996…. THE BAR-ON EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT INVENTORY

    1996 THE ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSTRUCT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE EQ  HAS NOT KEPT PACE WITH INTEREST IN THE CONSTRUCT. There exist two scales described

    in conference papers, THE BAR-ON EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT INVENTORY (Bar-On, 1996a,b) and the Style in the Perception of Affect (Bernet, 1996), which attempt to measure the construct of emotional intelligence and have some validity evidence. The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory is a 133-item self-report measure which consists of 15 distinct scales that were developed based on Bar-On’s professional experience and his review of the literature.

    1996 THE SCALES INCLUDE ONES MEASURING: EMOTIONAL SELF-AWARENESS, ASSERTIVENESS, SELF- REGARD, SELF-ACTUALIZATION, INDEPENDENCE, EMPATHY, INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PROBLEM SOLVING, REALITY TESTING, FLEXIBILITY,  STRESS TOLERANCE, IMPULSE CONTROL, HAPPINESS AND OPTIMISM.

     Bar-On (1996a) reported that the scales showed evidence of validity in that

    they correlate with several measures which are theoretically related

    and differentiated between groups such as individuals who rated themselves

    as high on personal success

    Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion – ‎Mayer – Cited by 6783

    Emotional intelligence – ‎Salovey – Cited by 10154

    ————————————————————————————

    full unedited text

    Is Emotional Intelligence Overrated? Forget IQ versus EQ – Six Seconds

    www.6seconds.org/2014/10/16/emotionalintelligence-overrated/

    by Joshua Freedman | Oct 16, 2014 | EQ Business, Six Seconds | 40 comments

    Does IQ Beat EQ? Wrong Question.

    After 100 years of research, there’s little agreement on the definition of intelligence or how to measure IQ. Yet Adam Grant insists cognitive skill TRUMPS all, and “Emotional Intelligence Is Overrated.” His critique is wrong, but important.

    His latest post on LinkedIN is a follow up to his Atlantic piece on “The Dark Side of Emotional Intelligence,” where he warns it’s risky to develop emotional competence. For example, he even speculates that Hitler used emotional intelligence to manipulate people into a frenzy of mindless loyalty.

    Framing this as “IQ versus EQ” demonstrates neither. At any meeting, any dinner table conversation, it’s obvious that these aspects of intelligence need to work together. The ability to conduct complex analysis is hobbled (and dangerous) without the ability to connect meaningfully with other human beings. The ability to sense and manage emotion is nearly useless without the ability make meaning from rational observation.

    Traditional psychological research has treated emotion and cognition as separate, even competitive. The current trend in neuroscience says something new, and powerful: Thoughts and feelings are interdependent.

    Is IQ better than EQ? That’s the wrong question.

    Click To Tweet

    Emotions Drive People

    That said, in the human brain, no signal is more powerful than emotion. Emotion is a primary filter; it’s a signal of survival. Any high school teacher can tell you: Algebra can’t compete with love. As a growing body of neuroeconomics research shows, we make decisions with emotion, then justify those with logic. Obviously, we’ll do a better job in that process if IQ and EQ work together.

    Science is a process of mounting evidence. Grant cites a couple of studies to support his opinion, but the real test comes from hundreds. While there certainly are studies that find EQ to have little value, and studies that find IQ to be essential, today Google Scholar lists over a hundred thousand studies on emotional intelligence. The evidence is growing. The interest in EQ as an important construct is indisputable.

    In your brain, emotion has primacy

    Click To Tweet

    The Evidence for Emotional Intelligence

    This year, for the first time, a “big data” approach was used to assess the significance of emotional intelligence around the globe. Using a random-sampling process from a database of over 75,000 people, Six Seconds created a sample that’s balanced across age, gender, role and region to publish The State of the Heart Report. Assessing both EQ and performance outcomes (e.g., effectiveness, relationships, decision-making). The result: Between 50-60% of variation in these performance scores are predicted by EQ.

    While Grant says EQ is unimportant on the job, The Business Case for Emotional Intelligence and The School Case for Emotional Intelligence, scores of studies say otherwise. Perhaps more importantly, in real-world examples, in people’s daily lives, we can see emotional intelligence skills improve performance at work, in school, and in life. They predict career success, school success, classroom behavior, stress management, leadership influence, employee engagement & performance, plant safety, change leadership, employee retention and even life success for professional athletes.

    Even more, emotional intelligence is an enabler of cognitive development. Looking at the fascinating body of neuro-learning research from Mary Helen Immordino Yang and other cognitive neuroscientists (see Medina’s Brain Rules for a good intro), a new perspective emerges: at a neurological level, thinking and emotion work together. We don’t “think” with one part of the brain and “feel” with another; the process of learning is built into the very same neural circuits as the process of social-emotional interaction.

    Intelligence is built in the social brain

    Click To Tweet

    Is EQ More Important than IQ?

    None of this is to say that IQ is unimportant. In education and business we ALREADY focus on IQ. For the last hundred+ years, cognitive development has been the primary goal of education: we have seen IQ scores increase by two standard deviations over the last century (that means a “somewhat smart person today” would be a “genius” in 1915). This “Flynn Effect” suggests (a) that IQ tests don’t actually measure intelligence, and (b) that around the world massive attention is given to cognitive development.

    Growing IQ is helping us in many ways (creating innovations such as tiny computers that can be inserted into our hearts). At the same time, all this attention to IQ hasn’t solved other of the world’s most pressing problems (from poverty to environmental destruction to divorce to war). In fact, people today are more stressed, more lonely, and therefore less able to solve problems.

    Here in Silicon Valley, you can throw a rock and hit a building full of uber-intelligent engineers. These people are painfully smart – they graduated or dropped out from the top universities, they are only hired if they have good-to-scary levels of IQ. So now what? As Daniel Goleman explained in his rebuttal to Grant’s article (which includes a link to that piece), IQ gets you hired, but EQ gets you promoted.

    You need IQ to get hired, EQ to get promoted

    Click To Tweet

    The Dark Side of Emotional Intelligence

    While Grant’s LinkedIN post is deliberately hostile (promotional intelligence?), his Atlantic article has a more thoughtful and important point. Capabilities can be misused. So should we avoid these skills? The Taliban knows that educated girls will eventually overthrow the regime, so they suppress education to keep this “danger” at bay. Is that the approach we want to take emotional skill, or about any area of knowledge?

    Emotional intelligence is a tool. Can someone misuse it? Sure. A baseball bat is for play, but in the wrong hands… One can make the danger argument for any skill, but it doesn’t make it inherently dangerous. There is nothing inherently manipulative about understanding one’s emotions and using that understanding for better decision making. The only real path forward is wisdom.

    Intelligence is not enough. We need to apply intelligence with the discernment that comes from awareness and compassion. Our purpose at Six Seconds is to support people to create positive change. Change that ennobles and empowers self and others. It’s the essence of leadership, and it’s urgently needed. While we must have cognitive power, but people are not just rational: the missing link is emotional intelligence.

    Emotional intelligence is the missing link

    Joshua Freedman

    CEO at Six Seconds

    Joshua is one of the world’s preeminent experts on developing emotional intelligence to create positive change. With warmth and authenticity, he translates leading-edge science into practical, applicable terms that improve the quality of relationships to unlock enduring success. Joshua leads the world’s largest network of emotional intelligence practitioners and researchers.

    ———————————————————-

    How could the experts have been so WRONG?

    BOO HOO… WHINING… CRYING… SOBBING… RECOUNTING….

    HOW COULD THE INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT  (IQ) EXPERTS ETAL. MEDIA AND POLLS HAVE BEEN SO WRONG ABOUT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EQ)?

    PERHAPS IT’S BECAUSE “THEY” WERE ALL  SO PRESUMPTUOUSLY ARROGANT AND BIASED THEY DIDN’T EVEN BOTHER TO RESEARCH THE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EQ) OF VOTERS?

    AND SO THE SAME SO CALLED POLITICO PUNDITS  EXPERTS,  CONTINUE  THEIR BIASED BLAH, BLAH, BLAH AD NAUSEUM BLATHER….

    DAY AFTER DAY… NIGHT AFTER NIGHT  ON EVERY PUBLIC TV STATION (INCLUDING FOX)  GLOBALLY AND IN THE USA.

    ————————————————————-

    the bottom line…..

    DONALD J. TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, OR EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT (EQ), is defined as an individual’s ability to identify, evaluate, control, and express emotions. PEOPLE WITH HIGH EQ USUALLY MAKE GREAT LEADERS AND TEAM PLAYERS BECAUSE OF THEIR ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND, EMPATHIZE, AND CONNECT WITH THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM.

    ANY QUESTIONS?


  • Hillary Supporters Don’t Know History

    Undecided? This American history lesson is for you.

    “Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.”

    Who said that? Edmund Burke  He is mainly remembered for his support of the American colonies in the dispute with King George III and Great Britain

    THAT LED TO THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION.

    ——————————————————————————

    DOOMED BY DEFINITION: CONDEMNED” TO CERTAIN DESTRUCTION OR DEATH. CAUSE TO HAVE AN UNFORTUNATE AND INESCAPABLE OUTCOME.

    ——————————————————

    WINSTON CHURCHILL WORRIED NOT SO MUCH THAT THOSE WHO FORGET THE PAST ARE “CONDEMNED” TO RELIVE IT, BUT THAT THE LOSS OF THE PAST WOULD MEAN  (House of Commons, 16 November 1948)

    RECENT HISTORY? WOULD MEAN?

    WITHOUT AMERICA THERE IS NO FREE WORLD

    WITHOUT TRUMP THERE IS NO AMERICA

    INDEED, WE MUST ELECT TRUMP PRESIDENT

    —————————————————————–

     PAST HISTORY? LOST PAST?  RECENT HISTORY? WOULD MEAN?

    THE DOCUMENTED “BLATANT” CORRUPTION OF HILLARY, THE CLINTON’S AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

    INDEED, THAT CORRUPTION IS WHAT LED THE REVOLUTION OF AMERICAN VOTERS TO ELECT DONALD J. TRUMP IN THE PRIMARY.

    TRUMP AND HIS PATRIOTIC AMERICAN SUPPORTERS  DO KNOW HISTORY THE OF OUR COUNTRY,

    AND WE KNOW THE PAST EIGHT YEAR HISTORY  OF OBAMA’S GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION

    AND,  SO HELP ME GOD “WE THE PEOPLE” ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THE “BLATANT”  IGNORANCE,  OR AS GRUBER CALLS IT STUPIDITY OR WHATEVER, OF HILLARY’S VOTERS TO DOOM THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    —————————————————————-

    “BLATANT”  is a key word in this post

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORD “BLATANT”  BY DEFINITION

    Late 16th century: perhaps an alteration of Scots blatand ‘BLEATING’.

    It was first used by Spenser AS AN EPITHET FOR A THOUSAND-TONGUED MONSTER produced by Cerberus and Chimaera,

    A SYMBOL OF CALUMNY, WHICH HE CALLED THE BLATANT BEAST.

    It was subsequently USED TO MEAN ‘CLAMOROUS, OFFENSIVE TO THE EAR’, first of people (mid 17th century), later of things (late 18th century);

    The sense ‘UNASHAMEDLY CONSPICUOUS’ arose in the late 19th century.

    —————————————————————————-

    HILLARY’S “BLATANT”  CALUMNIES AGAINST DONALD J. TRUMP, AND HIS BASKET OF DEPLORABLES  ‘UNASHAMEDLY CONSPICUOUS’

    HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN RALLIES AND MEDIA ADS, ARE BLATANT  CALUMNIES AGAINST DONALD J. TRUMP, MOSTLY FALSE, BUT ALWAYS  MALICIOUS STATEMENT DESIGNED TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF SOMEONE OR SOMETHING:

    HILLARY’S SPEECH’S ARE CONSIDERED A CALUMNY OF THE ENTIRE CORRUPT OBAMA  ADMINISTRATION AGAINST DONALD J. TRUMP AND HIS BASKET OF DEPLORABLES  . …

    HILLARY’S ACTS OF UTTERING CALUMNIES; SLANDER; DEFAMATION.  ‘UNASHAMEDLY CONSPICUOUS’

    ———————————————————————————-

    SO, HOW COULD ANYBODY, THAT KNOWS HISTORY, BE STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR HILLARY?

    ——————————————————————————-

    HOW STUPID DOES FBI COMEY I.E. THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION THINK AMERICAN VOTERS ARE?

    THE BLATANT, UNASHAMEDLY CONSPICUOUS REPEATED ACTIONS OF FBI COMEY “NO CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST HILARY”  

    REALLY?  THE FBI REVIEWED AND DISMISSED THE NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS AND CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST HILLARY ON 650,000 EMAILS CONNECTING HILLARY, HUMA AND  WEINER’S LAPTOP IN JUST EIGHT DAYS.

    HILLARY IS STILL AS BLATANTLY CRIMINALLY GUILTY AS SHE WAS IN JULY.

    ——————————————————–

    NEVER INSULT THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE I.E VOTERS

    HELL HAS NO FURY, AS AMERICAN’S SCORNED BY A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.

    AND,  SO HELP ME GOD “WE THE PEOPLE” ARE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THE BLATANT  IGNORANCE,  OR AS GRUBER CALLS IT STUPIDITY OR WHATEVER, OF HILLARY’S VOTERS TO DOOM THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    —————————————————-

    PAST HISTORY? LOST PAST?  RECENT HISTORY? WOULD MEAN?

    PRESIDENT LINCOLN DELIVERED THE 272 WORD GETTYSBURG ADDRESS ON NOVEMBER 19, 1863 and the world long remembered what he spoke that day.

    NOV 7, 2016  AND NOV 19, 1863

    WE HERE HIGHLY RESOLVE THESE DEAD SHALL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN; THAT THE NATION, SHALL HAVE A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM, AND THAT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE, SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH.

    ——————————————–

    ON NOV. 8, 2016 THE WORLD WILL LONG REMEMBER WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS DID TO PROTECT A GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE, SO IT SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH.

    WINSTON CHURCHILL WORRIED NOT SO MUCH THAT THOSE WHO FORGET THE PAST ARE “CONDEMNED” TO RELIVE IT,

    BUT THAT THE LOSS OF THE PAST WOULD MEAN 

    WITHOUT AMERICA THERE IS NO FREE WORLD

    WITHOUT TRUMP THERE IS NO AMERICA

    INDEED, WE MUST ELECT TRUMP PRESIDENT

    —————————————————————————————

    SO, HOW COULD ANYBODY, THAT KNOWS HISTORY, BE STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR HILLARY?

    ————————————————————————————-

    AS,  JUST ONE INDIVIDUAL, A CONCERNED AMERICAN GRANDMOTHER THIS IS MY 816TH POST ON MY WEBSITE  behindmyback.org  WHERE THE ESTABLISHMENTS CORRUPT AMERICAN GOVERNMENT DOES OUR BUSINESS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

    ——————————————————————-

    THE BLATANT HISTORY OF OBAMA’S FAILED CORRUPT  AMERICAN  GOVERNMENT?

    DOES THIS HISTORY SOUND FAMILIAR ON NOV 7, 2016?

     Winston Churchill  House of Commons, 2 May 1935,

    “When the situation was manageable it was neglected, and now that it is thoroughly out of hand we apply too late the remedies which then might have effected a cure…..

     Want of foresight, unwillingness to act when action would be simple and effective, lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong–these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history.”

    ————————————————————————–

    PAST HISTORY? LOST PAST?  RECENT HISTORY? WOULD MEAN?

    WHEN THE EMERGENCY CAME, WHEN SELF-PRESERVATION STRUCK  ITS JARRING GONG

    WHEN IN THE COURSE OF HUMAN EVENTS IT BECAME NECESSARY

    DONALD J. TRUMP ANNOUNCED HIS CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    “WHEN THE SITUATION WAS MANAGEABLE IT WAS NEGLECTED, AND NOW THAT IT IS THOROUGHLY OUT OF HAND….

    INDEED, IT IS NOT ONLY OUR RIGHT, IT IS OUR DUTY AS AMERICAN CITIZENS TO VOTE FOR TRUMP’S  REMEDIES WHICH THEN MIGHT EFFECTED A CURE…..

    —————————————————————————

    PAST HISTORY? LOST PAST?  RECENT HISTORY? WOULD MEAN?

    June of 1776,  NOV 8, 2016,  Thomas Jefferson the Declaration of Independence .  When in the course of human events it becomes necessary? Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    WHEN A LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

    ———————————————————————————

    Full Video: Trump lays out his “Contract with America” – YouTube

    ▶ 39:27

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4ysuQ3wiXc

    Oct 22, 2016 – Uploaded by CBS News

    Donald Trump addressed what he plans to do in his first 100 days in office during a policy speech in …


  • WikiLeaks Hillary’s 2 Faces and 5 Eyes

    YEP… WikiLeaks Hillary Has 2 Faces and 5 Eyes

    The WikiLeak Scandal?

    The scandal broke in early June 2013 when the Guardian newspaper reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans.

    ——————————————————————————————

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    Seattle grounds police drone program | The Seattle Times

    www.seattletimes.com/seattle…/seattle-grounds-policedrone-progra…

    The Seattle Times

    FEB 7, 2013 – Mayor Mike McGinn has pulled the plug on the department’s controversial drone program even before it got off the ground.

    The announcement came one day after the city held a public hearing on a proposed ordinance outlining restrictions for the department’s drone program, WHICH DREW VOCAL OPPOSITION FROM NUMEROUS CITIZENS CONCERNED WITH INTRUSIONS INTO THEIR PRIVACY.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    WOW…  HILLARY THINKS SHE OWNS ALL OF THE 2016 WA STATE VOTERS

    ————————————————————————————–

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    ”NOAA testing drones to monitor Wash. Coast
    By Sandi Doughton, The Seattle Times Published: Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 10:13 am
    Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

    THE SCIENTIFIC USE OF DRONES HASN’T YET DRAWN THE SAME TYPE OF PRIVACY CONCERNS THAT FORCED THE SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO WAREHOUSE ITS UNMANNED AIRCRAFT.

     SEVERAL STATES, INCLUDING IDAHO AND MONTANA, ENACTED RESTRICTIONS THIS YEAR ON THE USE OF DRONES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OR TO SPY ON PEOPLE.

    ———————————————————————–

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    July 17, 2013,

    After so many instances of government snooping, like the National Security Agency combing through phone and Internet records, Hewett said she doesn’t trust scientists who say the images and data they collect will be used only for research.

    ———————————————

    Behind My Back | Drone on Big Brother

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/07/23/drone-on-bigbrother/

    Jul 23, 2013It disturbs me that this is what my grandchildren and great-grandchildren are going to be living with,” Hewett said. “A Big Brother society that is … watching you everywhere.

    —————————

    Behind My Back | NSA’s Gotta YOTTABYTE?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/01/19/nsas-gotta-yottabyte/

    Jan 19, 2014 – Jul 24, 2013 – A guide from Cisco explains that a yottabyte = 1,000 …

    AND, What NSA can’t do now, it will certainly be able to do in a half …

    ———————————————————————————

    Hmmm… DRONES FOR RESEARCH

     AND WIKILEAKS OTHER USES FOR DRONES?

     WikiLeaks NOVEMBER 23, 2010 THE PRIVATE FACE OF HILLARY AND HER SERVER

    Report: Clinton mulled killing Wikileaks’ Julian Assange with drone strike

    Tuesday NOVEMBER 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. Clinton met with staff on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010.

    Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables.

    Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination.

    That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

    “CAN’T WE JUST DRONE THIS GUY?” CLINTON OPENLY INQUIRED, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources.

    The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said.

    Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases,

    —————————————————–

    …[E]mails previously released from Clinton’s private server reveal Anne Marie Slaughter, a former director of policy planning at the State Department, sent an email on the same day in 2010 on the subject of possible “nonlegal strategies” for dealing with WikiLeaks. That email also notes that a meeting was held that day to discuss WikiLeaks.

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    ————————————————————————–

    The two faces of Hillary PUBLIC AND PRIVATE

    THE  “FIVE EYES” of Hillary

    CLASSIFIED TWO LEVELS ABOVE TOP SECRET

    THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE MEMBERS,  UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.

    2011 OCT. 11: WIKILEAKS, DOCUMENTS, I.E. THE MERKEL DOCUMENT IS CLASSIFIED TWO LEVELS ABOVE TOP SECRET, AN INDICATOR THAT THE MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED HIGHLY SENSITIVE.

    NOTE: 2011 OCT. 11: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON WAS THE SECRETARY OF STATE

    EVEN SO, IT IS CLEARED FOR SHARING WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF

    THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE OF UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.

    ————————————————————————————–

    I found this 44 page document by Glenn Greenwald online

    NO PLACE TO HIDE  [PDF] NPTH-03-WIDE.PDF

    https://cryptome.wikileaks.org/2014/05/npth-03.pdf

    OFFENSIVE CYBER-OPERATIONS, WERE AMONG THE US GOVERNMENT’S …. 2011 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE FIVE EYES ALLIANCE, for … clear that the British spy agency also uses this phrase to … For each individual country, the NSA also produces a daily.

    —————————————————————————-

    WikiLeaks… Boundless “FIVE EYES” cyber spying Information in a 30 day period IN 2013  on emails and phone calls?

    COLLECTING 96 billion emails and 124 billion phone calls from around the world.

    in JUST a 30 day period in 2013.

    Today is Oct 26, 2016 HOW MUCH CYBER SPYING DATA HAS BEEN COLLECTED SINCE 2013?

    THERE IS NO PRACTICAL “HUMAN” APPLICATION FOR THAT AMOUNT OF SECRET DATA FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.

    ————————————————————————–

    Remember,  Hillary Clinton served as United States Secretary of State, under President Barack Obama, from 2009 to 2013, overseeing the department that conducted the Foreign policy of Barack Obama. She was preceded in office by Condoleezza Rice, and succeeded by John Kerry.

    ———————————————————————————

    NO PLACE TO HIDE

    Edward Snowden the NSA and the US surveillance state

    Dedicated to those many who have sought to shine light on the US governments secret mass surveillance state.

     The vast majority of the files in the archive were designated as “TOP SECRET”. Most of these were marked “FVERY” meaning that they were approved for distribution only to NSA’S four closest surveillance allies UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND….

     Boundless Information in a 30 day period on emails and phone calls?

    96 billion emails and 124 billion phone calls from around the world.

    Germany 500 million, Brazil 2.3 billion, India 13.5 billion, France 70 million, Spain 60 million, Italy 47 billion…….

    ——————————————————————

    Just saying Seattle’s $82,000 invasion of privacy drones,

    Paid for with American tax dollars ended up as……

    A ‘Gift’ for the LAPD: Two Surveillance Drones Kicked Out of Seattle …

    motherboard.vice.com/read/lapd-seattle-surveillance-drones

    Vice Jun 4, 2014 – Last week, the Los Angeles police department announced a new … As the press release emphasizes, these drones didn’t cost Los Angeles a cent. … criticism for failing to inform city hall about its drone purchases for more than a year. … SPD and the Department of Homeland Security, which paid $82,000 to …

    —————————————————–

    The bottom line when you VOTE for president

    VOTE FOR DONALD J. TRUMP

    What you see is what you get, one face and two eyes, keenly focused on AMERICA


  • WE OWN AMERICA

    WE OWN YOUR NEWS, THE MEDIA, YOUR OIL AND YOUR GOVERNMENT

    You have probably never heard of me
    ——————————————————————

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE UNITED STATES.

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS A IS PRIVATELY OWNED BANK AND WHERE THE UNITED STATES KEEPS MOST OF ITS MONEY.

    The bottom line 1916 – Three years after signing the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT  into law, President Woodrow Wilson observes: 

    “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated.

    And? the same 1916 bottom line 100 years later, Oct 21, 2016

    The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.

    We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.

    No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority,

    but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

    ————————————————————————————–
    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    Apr 11, 2016- Apr 28, 2016

    Behind My Back | Just a Matter of Time and Money 1790-2016

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/28/just-a-matter-of-time-and-money-1790-2016/

    Apr 28, 2016 – JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND FOREIGN MONEY 1790-2016 1790 … www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent–weapons-for-a-quiet–war/.

    ————————————————————

    There are  Images for my name is jacob rothschild  online

    HELLO THERE,

    MY NAME IS JACOB ROTHSCHILD

    MY FAMILY IS WORTH 500 TRILLION DOLLARS

    WE OWN NEARLY EVERY CENTRAL BANK IN THE WORLD

    WE FINANCED BOTH SIDES OF EVERY WAR SINCE NAPOLEON

    WE OWN YOUR NEWS, THE MEDIA, YOUR OIL AND YOUR GOVERNMENT

    You have probably never heard of me

    ——————————————————————————–

    I have a family and I have a history

    1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states:

    “Let me issue and control a nations money and I care not who writes the law.

    Behind My Back | Silent Weapons For a Quiet War

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silentweapons-for-a-quietwar/

    Apr 11, 2016 – Silent Weapons For a Quiet War a snippet… DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY Experience has proven that the simplest method of …

    ————————————————————————————
    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.

    TRUMP KNOWS THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    WITHOUT AMERICA, THERE IS NO FREE WORLD

    THE SILENT MAJORITY CRIED FOR HELP, THE PUBLIC AND SOCIAL MEDIA HEARD IT AT TRUMP RALLY’S.

    WITHOUT TRUMP THERE IS NO AMERICA

    ONLY DONALD J. TRUMP AS PRESIDENT CAN FIX IT.

    HILLARY’S ONLY DEFENSE OF HER 30 YEARS OF POLITICAL FAILURE IS DIVERSION

    (a) unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media – especially the T.V. and the newspapers.

    DIVERSION SUMMARY MEDIA:

    Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.

    SCHOOLS: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.

    ENTERTAINMENT: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.

    WORK: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals.

    ——————————————-

    HILLARY’S PRIVATE BILDERBERG AGENDA  2015-2016

    ———————————————————-

    *Clinton: “It Would Be Very Difficult To Run For President Without Raising A Huge Amount Of Money And Without Having Other People Supporting You. Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]

    ————————————————————-

    In 2015, the Bilderberg elite was confident that Clinton could shake off her GOP challengers, but Trump’s self-funded campaign and his public opposition to globalism and internationalist trade deals like NAFTA has shocked the Bilderberg elitists. As a result, it will now have to spend much more time dealing with the damage control.

    The Bilderberg 2016 Agenda: Trump, Riots, Migrants, Brexit | Zero …

    www.zerohedge.com/…/bilderberg-2016-agenda-trump-brexit-migrants-ri…
    Zero Hedge

    Jun 8, 2016 – The Bilderberg 2016 Agenda: Trump, Riots, Migrants, Brexit. Tyler Durden’s picture. by Tyler Durden. Jun 9, 2016 5:39 AM.

    The official list of “key topics” to be discussed is both broad quite vague.

    That’s just for public consumption. After all, who needs massive concrete blocks and 400 police officers for protection to discuss “technological innovation”

    ————————————————-

    HILLARY’S PRIVATE ELECTION AGENDA  2015-2016

    SHORT LIST OF OUT PUTS

    Outputs – create controlled situations

    – manipulation of the economy. hence society

    – control by control of compensation and losses.

    Sequence:

    (1) allocates opportunities.

    (2) destroys opportunities.

    (3) controls the economic industry.

    (4) controls the availability of raw materials

    (5) controls capital.

    (6) controls bank rates.

    (7) controls the inflation of the currency.

    (8) controls the possession of property.

    (9) controls the industrial capacity.

    (10) controls manufacturing.

    (11) controls the availability of goods (commodities).

    (12) controls the prices of commodities.

    (13) controls services, the labor force, etc.

    (14) controls payments to government officials.

    (15) controls the legal functions

    (16) controls the personal data file uncorrectable – by the party slandered.

    (17) controls advertising.

    (18) controls media content.

    (19) controls material available for T.V. viewing.

    (20) disengages attention from real issues.

    (21) engages emotions.

    (22) creates disorder, chaos, and insanity.

    (23) controls design of more probing tax forms.

    (24) controls surveillance.

    (25) controls the storage of information.

    (26) develops psychological analyses and profiles of individuals.

    (27) controls legal functions (repeat of 15).

    (28) controls sociological factors.

    (29) controls health options.

    (30) preys on weaknesses.

    (31) cripples strengths.

    (32) leaches wealth and substance.

    ——————————————————————-

    DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY

    Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

    This is achieved by:

    (1) Disengaging their minds, sabotaging their mental activities, by providing a low quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design, and economics, and by discouraging technical creativity.

    (2) Engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:

    (a) unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media – especially the T.V. and the newspapers.

    (b) giving them what they desire – in excess – “junk food for thought” and depriving them of what they really need.

    (3) Rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.

    These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology.

    The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer the solutions

    —————————————————————————

    The shadow forces behind the New World Order (NWO) are following a slow-paced agenda of total control over mankind and our planet’s resources. David Icke coined it the “Totalitarian Tip-Toe,” because “they” are making very small steps towards our complete and definitive enslavement.

    Jefferson 1790 “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”.

    The bottom line… Woodrow Wilson 1916  and 90 years later, Oct 18, 2016

    The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

    ——————————————————————

    AMERICA WAS CREATED AS A SOVEREIGN COUNTRY,

    DON’T LET “HEMISPHERIC HILLARY” TURN IT INTO A  GLOBAL VILLAGE

    The bottom line

    WITHOUT AMERICA, THERE IS NO FREE WORLD

    VOTE FOR TRUMP

    WITHOUT TRUMP THERE IS NO AMERICA

    ONLY DONALD J. TRUMP AS PRESIDENT CAN FIX IT.

     


  • Hillary’s Tyranny Sold Out America

    WikiLeak emails are documenting lying crooked  Hillary, collusion, corrupt, super pacts, global pay per play, 33,000 emails erased bleached, secret servers, extremely careless, Hillary did not go to jail, Hillary collected millions and millions of dubious payola (the practice of bribing someone to use their influence or position to promote a particular product or interest) and the IRS gave her a good to go run for president pass.

    Jefferson 1970 “Single acts of tyranny (cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control) may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”.

    WikiLeak  emails are documenting  that Hillary, as Secretary of State sold out America to the world Bank, the Federal Reserve Cartel , her collusion and corruption at the highest levels in the world, As president Hillary would implement  hemispheric  United Nations globalized control over American Citizens with open borders and free trade and destroy American Sovereignty

    ——————————————————————————

    Oct 15, 2016 DIVERSION IS HILLARY’S ONLY STRATEGY (30 years of political experience)

    Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

    ———————————————————

    1954  THE DOCTRINE ADOPTED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE OF THE BILDERBURG GROUP DURING ITS FIRST KNOWN MEETING.

    DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY

     Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

     FOR AMERICAN VOTERS… COINCIDENCE?  I THINK NOT

    Bilderberg Chooses Hillary Clinton for 2016? | Global Research …

    www.globalresearch.ca/bilderberg-chooses-hillaryclinton-for-2016/5454829

    Jun 8, 2016 – The “official” Bilderberg Group website has released a list of … Bilderberg 2015 so far is the fact that a major Hillary Clinton advisor is on the list …

    It is also well-known that whatever agenda is discussed at Bilderberg will have repercussions for the entire world for years to come.

    By Intellihub News Global Research,

    is a leading independent news agency covering a wide range of issues including globalism, the increasing police state, and the control of media by a small number of corrupt corporations.

    —————————————————————-

    Behind My Back | Silent Weapons For a Quiet War

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent-weapons-for-a-quiet-war/

    This document is the doctrine adopted by the Policy Committee of the Bilderburg Group during its first known meeting in 1954.

    ——————————————————————–

    Silent Weapons For a Quiet War 1954

    Hillary’s Bilderburg Group

    1954 Although the so-called “moral Issues” were raised, in view of the law of natural selection IT WAS AGREED THAT A NATION OR WORLD OF PEOPLE WHO WILL NOT USE THEIR INTELLIGENCE ARE NO BETTER THAN ANIMALS WHO DO NOT HAVE INTELLIGENCE. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

    1954 CONSEQUENTLY, IN THE INTEREST OF FUTURE WORLD ORDER, PEACE, AND TRANQUILITY, IT WAS DECIDED TO PRIVATELY WAGE

    1954 A QUIET WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WITH AN ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE OF PERMANENTLY SHIFTING THE NATURAL AND SOCIAL ENERGY (WEALTH) OF THE UNDISCIPLINED AND IRRESPONSIBLE MANY INTO THE HANDS OF THE SELF-DISCIPLINED, RESPONSIBLE, AND WORTHY FEW.

    —————————————————————–

    Jefferson 1790, “Single acts of tyranny (cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control) may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day, but a series of oppressions begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery”.

    WikiLeaks Here’s the full excerpt of the Hillary’s remarks from the e-mail in question,

    WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 13, 2016. Some initial observations: The Soros Hamptons invite (link): Dear Mr. Podesta,. I am writing to follow …

    ——————————————————————————

    Behind My Back | Just a Matter of Time and Money 1790-2016

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/28/just-a-matter-of-time-and-money-1790-2016/

    Apr 28, 2016 – JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND FOREIGN MONEY 1790-2016 1790 … www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent–weapons-for-a-quiet–war/.

    —————————————————————————-

     HILLARY’S  HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS

    Behind My Back | “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/04/16/highcrimes-and-misdemeanors/

    Apr 16, 2014 – Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” by Jon Roland, … Original URL: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm | Text Version

    ———————————————————————–

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

    “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.”

    The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Rothschild, Rockefeller and Morgan …

    humansarefree.com/2015/06/the-federal-reserve-cartel-rothschild.html

    Jun 25, 2015 – The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control. A New York Herald headline read, “Railroad Kings Form …

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM IS A BANK THAT IS PRIVATELY OWNED, AND IS WHERE THE UNITED STATES KEEPS MOST OF ITS MONEY.

    To be continued….


  • Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Why American Citizens are VOTING FOR TRUMP and dumping the establishments politicians right and left.

    Full unedited  text

    9/11, 1990 President George H. W. Bush’s  New World Order Address

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    millercenter.org/president/bush/speeches/speech-3425

    Transcript

    Mr. President and Mr. Speaker and Members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, fellow Americans, thank you very much for that warm welcome. We gather tonight, witness to events in the Persian Gulf as significant as they are tragic. In the early morning hours of August 2d, following negotiations and promises by Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein not to use force, a powerful Iraqi army invaded its trusting and much weaker neighbor, Kuwait. Within 3 days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. IT WAS THEN THAT I DECIDED TO ACT TO CHECK THAT AGGRESSION.
    At this moment, our brave servicemen and women stand watch in that distant desert and on distant seas, side by side with the forces of more than 20 other nations. They are some of the finest men and women of the United States of America. And they’re doing one terrific job. These valiant Americans were ready at a moment’s notice to leave their spouses and their children, to serve on the front line halfway around the world. They remind us who keeps America strong: they do. In the trying circumstances of the Gulf, the morale of our service men and women is excellent. In the face of danger, they’re brave, they’re well-trained, and dedicated.
    A soldier, Private First Class Wade Merritt of Knoxville, Tennessee, now stationed in Saudi Arabia, wrote his parents of his worries, his love of family, and his hope for peace. But Wade also wrote, “I am proud of my country and its firm stance against inhumane aggression. I am proud of my army and its men. I am proud to serve my country.” Well, let me just say, Wade, America is proud of you and is grateful to every soldier, sailor, marine, and airman serving the cause of peace in the Persian Gulf. I also want to thank the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Powell; the Chiefs here tonight; our commander in the Persian Gulf, General Schwartzkopf; and the men and women of the Department of Defense. What a magnificent job you all are doing. And thank you very, very much from a grateful people. I wish I could say that their work is done. But we all know it’s not.
    So, if there ever was a time to put country before self and patriotism before party, the time is now. And let me thank all Americans, especially those here in this Chamber tonight, for your support for our armed forces and for their mission. That support will be even more important in the days to come. So, tonight I want to talk to you about what’s at stake—what we must do together to defend civilized values around the world and maintain our economic strength at home.
    Our objectives in the Persian Gulf are clear, our goals defined and familiar: Iraq must withdraw from Kuwait completely, immediately, and without condition. Kuwait’s legitimate government must be restored. The security and stability of the Persian Gulf must be assured. And American citizens abroad must be protected. These goals are not ours alone. They’ve been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council five times in as many weeks. Most countries share our concern for principle. And many have a stake in the stability of the Persian Gulf. This is not, as Saddam Hussein would have it, the United States against Iraq. It is Iraq against the world.
    As you know, I’ve just returned from a very productive meeting with Soviet President Gorbachev. And I am pleased that we are working together to build a new relationship. In Helsinki, our joint statement affirmed to the world our shared resolve to counter Iraq’s threat to peace. Let me quote: “We are united in the belief that Iraq’s aggression must not be tolerated. No peaceful international order is possible if larger states can devour their smaller neighbors.” Clearly, no longer can a dictator count on East-West confrontation to stymie concerted United Nations action against aggression. A new partnership of nations has begun.
    We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.
    The test we face is great, and so are the stakes. This is the first assault on the new world that we seek, the first test of our mettle. Had we not responded to this first provocation with clarity of purpose, if we do not continue to demonstrate our determination, it would be a signal to actual and potential despots around the world. America and the world must defend common vital interests—and we will. America and the world must support the rule of law—and we will. America and the world must stand up to aggression—and we will. And one thing more: In the pursuit of these goals America will not be intimidated.
    Vital issues of principle are at stake. Saddam Hussein is literally trying to wipe a country off the face of the Earth. We do not exaggerate. Nor do we exaggerate when we say Saddam Hussein will fail. Vital economic interests are at risk as well. Iraq itself controls some 10 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves. Iraq plus Kuwait controls twice that. An Iraq permitted to swallow Kuwait would have the economic and military power, as well as the arrogance, to intimidate and coerce its neighbors—neighbors who control the lion’s share of the world’s remaining oil reserves. We cannot permit a resource so vital to be dominated by one so ruthless. And we won’t.
    Recent events have surely proven that there is no substitute for American leadership. In the face of tyranny, let no one doubt American credibility and reliability. Let no one doubt our staying power. We will stand by our friends. One way or another, the leader of Iraq must learn this fundamental truth. From the outset, acting hand in hand with others, we’ve sought to fashion the broadest possible international response to Iraq’s aggression. The level of world cooperation and condemnation of Iraq is unprecedented. Armed forces from countries spanning four continents are there at the request of King Fahd of Saudi Arabia to deter and, if need be, to defend against attack. Moslems and non-Moslems, Arabs and non-Arabs, soldiers from many nations stand shoulder to shoulder, resolute against Saddam Hussein’s ambitions.
    We can now point to five United Nations Security Council resolutions that condemn Iraq’s aggression. They call for Iraq’s immediate and unconditional withdrawal, the restoration of Kuwait’s legitimate government, and categorically reject Iraq’s cynical and self-serving attempt to annex Kuwait. Finally, the United Nations has demanded the release of all foreign nationals held hostage against their will and in contravention of international law. It is a mockery of human decency to call these people “guests.” They are hostages, and the whole world knows it.
    Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a dependable ally, said it all: “We do not bargain over hostages. We will not stoop to the level of using human beings as bargaining chips ever.” Of course, of course, our hearts go out to the hostages and to their families. But our policy cannot change, and it will not change. America and the world will not be blackmailed by this ruthless policy.
    We’re now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders. We owe much to the outstanding leadership of Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar. The United Nations is backing up its words with action. The Security Council has imposed mandatory economic sanctions on Iraq, designed to force Iraq to relinquish the spoils of its illegal conquest. The Security Council has also taken the decisive step of authorizing the use of all means necessary to ensure compliance with these sanctions. Together with our friends and allies, ships of the United States Navy are today patrolling Mideast waters. They’ve already intercepted more than 700 ships to enforce the sanctions. Three regional leaders I spoke with just yesterday told me that these sanctions are working. Iraq is feeling the heat. We continue to hope that Iraq’s leaders will recalculate just what their aggression has cost them. They are cut off from world trade, unable to sell their oil. And only a tiny fraction of goods gets through.
    The communique with President Gorbachev made mention of what happens when the embargo is so effective that children of Iraq literally need milk or the sick truly need medicine. Then, under strict international supervision that guarantees the proper destination, then food will be permitted.
    At home, the material cost of our leadership can be steep. That’s why Secretary of State Baker and Treasury Secretary Brady have met with many world leaders to underscore that the burden of this collective effort must be shared. We are prepared to do our share and more to help carry that load; we insist that others do their share as well.
    The response of most of our friends and allies has been good. To help defray costs, the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE—the United Arab Emirates—have pledged to provide our deployed troops with all the food and fuel they need. Generous assistance will also be provided to stalwart front-line nations, such as Turkey and Egypt. I am also heartened to report that this international response extends to the neediest victims of this conflict—those refugees. For our part, we’ve contributed $28 million for relief efforts. This is but a portion of what is needed. I commend, in particular, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and several European nations who have joined us in this purely humanitarian effort.
    There’s an energy-related cost to be borne as well. Oil-producing nations are already replacing lost Iraqi and Kuwaiti output. More than half of what was lost has been made up. And we’re getting superb cooperation. If producers, including the United States, continue steps to expand oil and gas production, we can stabilize prices and guarantee against hardship. Additionally, we and several of our allies always have the option to extract oil from our strategic petroleum reserves if conditions warrant. As I’ve pointed out before, conservation efforts are essential to keep our energy needs as low as possible. And we must then take advantage of our energy sources across the board: coal, natural gas, hydro, and nuclear. Our failure to do these things has made us more dependent on foreign oil than ever before. Finally, let no one even contemplate profiteering from this crisis. We will not have it.
    I cannot predict just how long it will take to convince Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. Sanctions will take time to have their full intended effect. We will continue to review all options with our allies, but let it be clear: we will not let this aggression stand.
    Our interest, our involvement in the Gulf is not transitory. It predated Saddam Hussein’s aggression and will survive it. Long after all our troops come home—and we all hope it’s soon, very soon—there will be a lasting role for the United States in assisting the nations of the Persian Gulf. Our role then: to deter future aggression. Our role is to help our friends in their own self-defense. And something else: to curb the proliferation of chemical, biological, ballistic missile and, above all, nuclear technologies.
    Let me also make clear that the United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people. Our quarrel is with Iraq’s dictator and with his aggression. Iraq will not be permitted to annex Kuwait. That’s not a threat, that’s not a boast, that’s just the way it’s going to be.
    Our ability to function effectively as a great power abroad depends on how we conduct ourselves at home. Our economy, our Armed Forces, our energy dependence, and our cohesion all determine whether we can help our friends and stand up to our foes. For America to lead, America must remain strong and vital. Our world leadership and domestic strength are mutual and reinforcing; a woven piece, strongly bound as Old Glory. To revitalize our leadership, our leadership capacity, we must address our budget deficit—not after election day, or next year, but now.
    Higher oil prices slow our growth, and higher defense costs would only make our fiscal deficit problem worse. That deficit was already greater than it should have been—a projected $232 billion for the coming year. It must—it will—be reduced.
    To my friends in Congress, together we must act this very month—before the next fiscal year begins on October 1st—to get America’s economic house in order. The Gulf situation helps us realize we are more economically vulnerable than we ever should be. Americans must never again enter any crisis, economic or military, with an excessive dependence on foreign oil and an excessive burden of Federal debt.
    Most Americans are sick and tired of endless battles in the Congress and between the branches over budget matters. It is high time we pulled together and get the job done right. It’s up to us to straighten this out. This job has four basic parts. First, the Congress should, this month, within a budget agreement, enact growth-oriented tax measures—to help avoid recession in the short term and to increase savings, investment, productivity, and competitiveness for the longer term. These measures include extending incentives for research and experimentation; expanding the use of IRA’s for new homeowners; establishing tax-deferred family savings accounts; creating incentives for the creation of enterprise zones and initiatives to encourage more domestic drilling; and, yes, reducing the tax rate on capital gains.
    And second, the Congress should, this month, enact a prudent multiyear defense program, one that reflects not only the improvement in East-West relations but our broader responsibilities to deal with the continuing risks of outlaw action and regional conflict. Even with our obligations in the Gulf, a sound defense budget can have some reduction in real terms; and we’re prepared to accept that. But to go beyond such levels, where cutting defense would threaten our vital margin of safety, is something I will never accept. The world is still dangerous. And surely, that is now clear. Stability’s not secure. American interests are far reaching. Interdependence has increased. The consequences of regional instability can be global. This is no time to risk America’s capacity to protect her vital interests.
    And third, the Congress should, this month, enact measures to increase domestic energy production and energy conservation in order to reduce dependence on foreign oil. These measures should include my proposals to increase incentives for domestic oil and gas exploration, fuel-switching, and to accelerate the development of the Alaskan energy resources without damage to wildlife. As you know, when the oil embargo was imposed in the early 1970’s, the United States imported almost 6 million barrels of oil a day. This year, before the Iraqi invasion, U.S. imports had risen to nearly 8 million barrels per day. And we’d moved in the wrong direction. And now we must act to correct that trend.
    And fourth, the Congress should, this month, enact a 5-year program to reduce the projected debt and deficits by $500 billion—that’s by half a trillion dollars. And if, with the Congress, we can develop a satisfactory program by the end of the month, we can avoid the ax of sequester—deep across-the-board cuts that would threaten our military capacity and risk substantial domestic disruption. I want to be able to tell the American people that we have truly solved the deficit problem. And for me to do that, a budget agreement must meet these tests: It must include the measures I’ve recommended to increase economic growth and reduce dependence on foreign oil. It must be fair. All should contribute, but the burden should not be excessive for any one group of programs or people. It must address the growth of government’s hidden liabilities. It must reform the budget process and, further, it must be real.
    I urge Congress to provide a comprehensive 5-year deficit reduction program to me as a complete legislative package, with measures to assure that it can be fully enforced. America is tired of phony deficit reduction or promise-now, save-later plans. It is time for a program that is credible and real. And finally, to the extent that the deficit reduction program includes new revenue measures, it must avoid any measure that would threaten economic growth or turn us back toward the days of punishing income tax rates. That is one path we should not head down again.
    I have been pleased with recent progress, although it has not always seemed so smooth. But now it’s time to produce. I hope we can work out a responsible plan. But with or without agreement from the budget summit, I ask both Houses of the Congress to allow a straight up-or-down vote on a complete $500-billion deficit reduction package not later than September 28. If the Congress cannot get me a budget, then Americans will have to face a tough, mandated sequester. I’m hopeful, in fact, I’m confident that the Congress will do what it should. And I can assure you that we in the executive branch will do our part.
    In the final analysis, our ability to meet our responsibilities abroad depends upon political will and consensus at home. This is never easy in democracies, for we govern only with the consent of the governed. And although free people in a free society are bound to have their differences, Americans traditionally come together in times of adversity and challenge.
    Once again, Americans have stepped forward to share a tearful goodbye with their families before leaving for a strange and distant shore. At this very moment, they serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That’s why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun. If they can come together under such adversity, if old adversaries like the Soviet Union and the United States can work in common cause, then surely we who are so fortunate to be in this great Chamber—Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives—can come together to fulfill our responsibilities here.
    Thank you. Good night. And God bless the United States of America.


  • Elect Trump What have you got to lose?

    Lose Lying’ Hillary

    Lose the Benghazi liar

    Lose the pay to play Clinton Foundation

    Lose the creeping Crud in the U.S.A.

    Lose the best government money can buy

    Lose the rigged elections

    Lose the super pacts

    Lose the establishments career politicians

    Lose the politicians insider trading

    Lose the politico establishments nepotism

    Lose the politico establishments cronyism

    Lose Obama’s Justice Department

    Lose the FBI’s run and hide

    Lose the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    Lose the global money control of BIS’s and ECC

    Lose the Global  too big to fail Federal Reserve

    Lose the rigged, lying partisan politico news media

    Lose the sanctuary cities

    Lose the open borders

    Lose the criminal  immigrants first

    Lose the revolving door

    Lose the press one for English

    Lose the lawless disorder

    Lose the illegal foreign immigrants invading our country

    Lose the ISIS radicalization in American prisons.

    Lose Shari law upheld in the American Judicial system

    Lose Appointed Judges

    Lose lying’ non-partisan candidates

    Lose the illegal immigrants that are stealing American jobs

    Lose the WRAP immigration program

    Lose the burkas

    Lose poverty in America

    Lose the homeless crisis in America

    Lose hunger in America

    Lose the long lines at community food banks

    Lose America’s crumbling infrastructure

    Lose corrupt establishment politicians

    Lose lead poisoned drinking water

    Lose the Criminal Catch and Release program

    Lose the alien killers, rapist

    Lose the cop Killers

    Lose the Mexican Cartel Heroin

    Lose the Mexican drug lords

    Lose the drug dealing Gangs

    Lose the horrific Mexican Heroin epidemic

    Lose the radical Islamic terrorists

    Lose the workplace beheading violence

    Lose the killing in gun free zones

    Lose the drive by killers

    Lose Obamacare

    Lose the $6000.00 Obamacare deductible

    Lose the greedy pharmaceutical  companies

    Lose the legally prescribed overdosing of opiate dependency

    Lose the drugging of American toddlers thru teens

    Lose the pills that kill in school shootings

    Lose Obama’s executive orders

    Lose Common core (indoctrination) education

    Lose the propaganda of non-traditional taught to American school kids

    Lose the bad trade deals

    Lose the establishment that plays while we pay

    Lose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    Lose the business killing rules and regulations

    Lose the taxes, tolls and fees

    Lose the working poor

    Lose the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

    Lose Global NGO sue and settle

    Lose America’s  slavery to the United Nations

    Lose the UN Hague decision

    Lose the taxpayer cash funding of terrorist country’s

    Lose the $20 Trillion Dollar National Debt

    Lose the liberals deep pockets credit cards

    Lose the UN Global Climate Change program

    Lose the taxpayers foreign aid program

    Lose the Veteran’s Abuse (VA) program

    Lose Obama’s  executive orders  Public land Grabs

    Lose Obama’s  monumental  landgrabbing  frenzy

    Lose the UNESCO control of American Public Land

    Lose the NGO Trusts that Grab Public land

    Lose the grants that fund Global NGO’S

    Lose the Agenda 21 Globalists agenda

    Lose the New World Order

    —————————————————-

    I’m voting for Trump

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Constructional Rights

    We the People shall NOT Lose our second Amendment Right

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Declaration of Independence

    We the People shall NOT Lose our America’s sovereignty

    Behind our backs behind closed doors

    ———————————————–

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the people shall have a government of the people, by the people and for the people

    And, we the people shall have one nation under God with liberty and justice for all