+menu-


  • Category Archives American Priorities
  • Pearl Harvey and The Rest of the Story

    Pearl Harvey and The Rest of the Story

    A pen name, a nom de plume (French), is a pseudonym, in my case  it is a variant form of my real name.

    A pseudonym is a name that a person assumes for a particular purpose.

    PEARL REVERE IS MY CODE NAME, running through cyberspace with red flag warnings. One if by land two if by sea….

    AFTER OVER 900 WARNINGS posted on http://www.behindmyback.org, since  it was registered: 2013-01-29 22:20:57 …

    PEARL HARVEY SHALL BE MY PEN NAME FOR UPDATES FOR  “THE REST OF MY STORIES”

    What would be my particular purpose for a French nom de plume, pen name,  Pearl Harvey?  The French term déjà vu means, literally, ‘already seen.’

    ———————————————————————

    PAUL HARVEY SAID “IN TIMES LIKE THESE IT HELPS TO RECALL THERE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN TIMES LIKE THESE”.

    ——————————————————————————

    WINSTON CHURCHILL SAID, ” IF YOU HAVE AN IMPORTANT POINT TO MAKE, DON’T TRY TO BE SUBTLE OR CLEVER. USE A PILE DRIVER. HIT THE POINT ONCE. THEN COME BACK AND HIT IT AGAIN. THEN HIT IT A THIRD TIME – A TREMENDOUS WHACK”.

    ——————————————————————————

    PAUL HARVEY BOOKS, THE REST OF THE STORY, PAUL HARVEY’S AMERICA, OUR LIVES, OUR FORTUNES, OUR SACRED HONOR,  DESTINY:

    FROM PAUL HARVEY’S THE REST OF THE STORY,  FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH……..

    ——————————————————————–

     IT’S TIME FOR “THE REST OF THE STORY” UPDATING MY 900 WARNINGS FROM JAN 29, 2013 TO APR 24, 2017

    —————————————————–

    Behind My Back | My code name “Pearl Revere”

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/02/01/my-code-name-pearl-revere/

    Feb 1, 2013 – My code name is “Pearl Revere” This blog is all about US, “We the People”. I had hoped that setting up a blog would give “We the people” a …

    ———————————————————————–

    Behind My Back | Paul and Pearl Revere

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/03/28/paul-and-pearl-revere/

    Mar 28, 2014 – So long, as my name is Pearl Rains Hewett (AKA Pearl Revere) I shall continue running through cyber space with red flag warnings, asking …

    ——————————————————————————–

     Winston Churchill — Quote “The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.”

    ———————————————————————————–

    Paul Harvey – Quote

    “Ever since I made tomorrow my favorite day, I’ve been uncomfortable looking back.”

    ———————————————————————–

    Just saying, Looking back, the farther I have been able to see, the more uncomfortable I am about tomorrow. (and you can quote me on that)

    The rest of the story, following up on 900 warnings, to U.S. Citizens of how various government agencies are violating the Constitution, taking away private property rights, and infringing on American … is dedicated to investigating, researching, documenting, updating and disseminating critical information to ..

    —————————————————————————–

    PAUL HARVEY RECEIVED MANY AWARDS, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENTIAL MEDAL OF FREEDOM FROM MR. BUSH IN 2005.

    BUT HE SAID HIS GREATEST HONOR WAS THE FLOOD OF LETTERS HIS LISTENERS WROTE TO BLESS AND THANK HIM FOR STANDING UP FOR SPIRITUAL VALUES AND THE AMERICAN WAY. It was to them that he signed off, with a rising inflection: “This is Paul Harvey — Good Day!”

     ———————————————————————

    SNOPES HAS BEEN SNOOPING….

    this is another one…

    Read More: Paul Harvey’s ‘If I Were The Devil’ Speech In 1965 Is Spot On Today | http://999ktdy.com/paul-harvey-if-i-were-the-devil-speech-in-1965-is-spot-on-today/?trackback=tsmclip

    You decide…

    ————————————————————————————–

    SNOPES HAS BEEN SNOOPING…. Contrasting that 1964 version of the essay with Paul Harvey’s 1996 newspaper version shows that, although the concept and structure of the essay remained the same across the decades, its content evolved quite a bit over the years:

    Paul Harvey’s 1964 newspaper version “If I Were the Devil” and the 1996 evolution of the Satan for  over 30 years? and  the evolution of the Satan for over 50 years?

    ——————————————————————–

    “IF I WERE THE DEVIL”, IF I WERE SATAN APRIL 24, 2017, I’D JUST KEEP DOING WHAT I’M DOING AND THE WHOLE WORLD GO TO HELL AS SURE AS THE DEVIL.

    —————————————————————————————-

    Click on this link, go to the bottom and watch the Snopes video clip

    it captures Paul Harvey’s radio equivalent of his 1996 newspaper version.

    Fact Check Political News Paul Harvey: ‘If I Were the Devil’ – Snopes.com

    www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/devil.asp

    Soapbox: Radio commentator Paul Harvey penned an essay entitled ‘If I Were the Devil.’ … Claim: Transcript reproduces radio commentator Paul Harvey’s essay entitled “If I Were the Devil.”. … If I were the Prince of Darkness I would want to engulf the whole earth in darkness.

    SNOPES SAYS The oldest genuine Paul Harvey version of this piece we’ve found so far appeared in his newspaper column in 1964:

    If I Were the Devil

    If I were the Prince of Darkness I would want to engulf the whole earth in darkness.

    I’d have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree.

    So I should set about however necessary, to take over the United States.

    I would begin with a campaign of whispers.

    With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whispers to you as I whispered to Eve, “Do as you please.”

    To the young I would whisper “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that “man created God,” instead of the other way around. I would confide that “what is bad is good and what is good is square.”

    In the ears of the young married I would whisper that work is debasing, that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be “extreme” in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct.

    And the old I would teach to pray — to say after me — “Our father which are in Washington.”

    Then I’d get organized.

    I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull, uninteresting.

    I’d threaten TV with dirtier movies, and vice-versa.

    I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing, less work. Idle hands usually work for me.

    I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could, I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction, I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.

    If I were the Devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects, but neglect to discipline emotions; let those run wild.

    I’d designate an atheist to front for me before the highest courts and I’d get preachers to say, “She’s right.”

    With flattery and promises of power I would get the courts to vote against God and in favor of pornography.

    Thus I would evict God from the courthouse, then from the schoolhouse, then from the Houses of Congress.

    Then in his own churches I’d substitute psychology for religion and deify science.

    If I were Satan I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg

    And the symbol of Christmas a bottle.

    If I were the Devil I’d take from those who have and give to those who wanted until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. Then my police state would force everybody back to work.

    Then I would separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines and objectors in slave-labor camps.

    If I were Satan I’d just keep doing what I’m doing and the whole world go to hell as sure as the Devil.

    ————————————————————————————–

    SNOPES SAYS, The  1996 newspaper version shows that, although the concept and structure of the essay remained the same across the decades, its content evolved quite a bit over the years:
    If I were the prince of darkness, I would want to engulf the whole world in darkness.

    I’d have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree — thee.

    So, I would set about however necessary to take over the United States.

    I’d subvert the churches first, and I would begin with a campaign of whispers.

    With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.”

    To the young, I would whisper that the Bible is a myth. I would convince the children that man created God instead of the other way around. I’d confide that what’s bad is good and what’s good is square.

    And the old, I would teach to pray after me, “Our Father, which are in Washington …”

    Then, I’d get organized, I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull and uninteresting.

    I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.

    If I were the devil, I’d soon have families at war with themselves, churches at war with themselves and nations at war with themselves until each, in its turn, was consumed.

    And with promises of higher ratings, I’d have mesmerizing media fanning the flames.

    If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellect but neglect to discipline emotions. I’d tell teachers to let those students run will. And before you knew it, you’d have drug-sniffing dogs and metal detectors at every schoolhouse door.

    With a decade, I’d have prisons overflowing and judges promoting pornography. Soon, I would evict God from the courthouse and the schoolhouse and them from the houses of Congress.

    In his own churches, I would substitute psychology for religion and deify science. I’d lure priests and pastors into misusing boys and girls and church money.

    If I were the devil, I’d take from those who have and give to those who wanted until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious.

    What’ll you bet I couldn’t get whole states to promote gambling as the way to get rich?

    I’d convince the young that marriage is old-fashioned, that swinging is more fun and that what you see on television is the way to be.

    And thus, I could undress you in public and lure you into bed with diseases for which there are no cures.

    In other words, if I were the devil, I’d just keep right on doing what he’s doing.

    ————————————————————————————————————-

    Paul Harvey’s 1964 newspaper version “If I Were the Devil”

    I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could, I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction,

    I’D TRANQUILIZE THE REST WITH PILLS.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    May 17, 2014 –More than 10000 American toddlers 2 or 3 years old are being medicated for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder outside established …

    MY WARNING..

    Behind My Back | Drugging Toddlers for A.D.H.D.

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/06/25/drugging-toddlers-for-a-d-h-d/

    Jun 25, 2014 – Drugging Toddlers for A.D.H.D. On May 16, 2014 the New York Times ran an article titled Thousands of Toddlers Are Medicated for A.D.H.D., …

    DOCUMENTATION..

    Thousands of Toddlers Are Medicated for A.D.H.D., Report Finds …

    https://www.nytimes.com/…/among-experts-scrutiny-of-attention-disorder-diagnoses-in-…

    May 16, 2014 – The practice draws concern, in part, because there has been little study on the use of A.D.H.D. drugs for children under 3.

    ———————————————————————————-

    THE WARNING AND THE REST OF THE STORY…..

    Behind My Back | Drugs From Cradle to Grave 1954-2016

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/12/17/drugs-from-cradle-to-grave/

    Dec 17, 2016DRUGS FROM THE “WOMB” TO THE CRADLE TO GRAVE 1954 – … www.behindmyback.org/2016/04/11/silent–weapons-for-a-quiet–war/.

    —————————————————————————————-

    TO BE CONTINUED, THE WARNING AND THE REST OF THE STORY…..

    Behind My Back | Paul and Pearl Revere

    www.behindmyback.org/category/paul-and-pearl-revere/

    Feb 6, 2017 – POLITICAL CORRECTNESS BE DAMNED. THE BIASED PUBLIC MEDIA REPORTING BE DAMNED. WA STATE AND CALIFORNIA JUDGES …


  • Trump’s DOI and EPA Pick?

    Trump’s DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (DOI) and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) Pick? 

    How WILD will it get?

    As we discovered through inquiry and questions what the candidates were all about and where their roots were fastened, we then had a good idea of where they were coming from and where they are trying to go, or take us.

     IN THE END, NOV 9, 2016 AMERICAN CITIZENS “DID NOT”  VOTE FOR A PRESIDENT WHO WILL TRY TO GET YOU TO AGREE TO SACRIFICE WHAT YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO LOSE TO SOMEONE WHO HASN’T EARNED IT, THEN TAKE YOU SOMEWHERE YOU DON’T WANT YOUR FAMILY, YOUR FRIENDS, YOURSELF, COMMUNITY, CITY, COUNTY, STATE OR COUNTRY, OR WORLD TO GO, LET ALONE BECOME!

    ————————————————-

    “Well, if I wanted all the people out of Northern California, what would I do?”

    I’d lock up all the natural resources.  I would remove all the infrastructure… like the DAMS. After some more time went by… I’d have the National Forest in a quasi wilderness area, I’d have the loggers gone…Get rid of the pesky diggers..the mining community. I’d go after the agriculture community…attempt to eliminate them.  I’d go up stream…get rid of the  dams, remove the water inventory and electrical generation for 70,000 homes.

    ————————————————————————————

    WELL, IF SENATOR PATTY MURRAY WANTED ALL OF THE PEOPLE OUT OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA IN WA STATE, WHAT WOULD SHE DO?

    SENATOR MURRAY MADE HER CHOICE, OVER SIX (6) YEARS AGO…. WILD OLYMPICS  WAS FIRST INTRODUCED IN 2010, IN 2012, CONGRESS NORM DICKS AND SENATOR PATTY MURRAY INTRODUCED IDENTICAL BILLS IN … WILD OLYMPICS WILDERNESS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT OF 2012

    APR 11, 2013 – PATTY MURRAY’S PROPOSAL IS CALLED WILD OLYMPICS.

    REINTRODUCING 2013-2014 and REINTRODUCING 2015-2016

    SENATOR MARIA CANTWELL was busy having roads decommissioned while MURRAY AND KILMER  waited in the wings with their phones and their pens.
    In the meantime Kilmer took on Dicks roll, with Murray to re-introduce the unwanted, unnecessary and wasteful Wild Olympics Wild & Scenic Act TWICE!

    ———————————————

    Behind My Back | The Roadless Crew Cantwell and Inslee

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/04/25/the-roadlesscrewcantwell-and-inslee/

    Apr 25, 2014 – The Roadless Crew Cantwell and Inslee. H.R.3465 — National Forest Roadless Area Conservation Act. Various forms of this bill have been …

    Keeping the rainbow green party voters smothered in free government grants, takes priority over the previously devastated Washington State and Olympic Peninsula jobs, that have been killed under this administration. The administrators who take money from you, to pay the pawns to help them pass their legacy agenda.

    ———————————————————————-

    Behind My Back | Dept. of Interior Deterioration

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/05/04/dept-of-interiordeterioration/

    May 4, 2014THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, President Obama Appointed Sally Jewell, she is a member of the cabinet of President …

    ————————————————————————————

    SENATE BILLS  FOR WILDERNESS AND WILDING, SACRIFICING THE USE OF OUR PUBLIC NATIONAL PARKS, PRIVATE LANDS  AND RIVERS.  PLACING RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RESOURCES OF, AND IN WASHINGTON, IDAHO, CALIFORNIA, AND OREGON STATE

    Wilding the West Murrays Choice Our Sacrifice

    Posted on April 15, 2016 10:41 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    Wilding the West Murray’s Choice Our Sacrifice

    —————————————————————–

    APR 11, 2013 Advocates will immediately tell you that Wild Olympics will not have any impact on current harvest levels and will only modestly harm jobs. WHILE THIS IS TECHNICALLY ACCURATE, IT’S ALSO INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING.

    IN 2013, THE MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL FORESTS WAS  DYSFUNCTIONAL AND INEFFECTIVE.

    WHEN ONE USES THE FALSE BASE CASE OF MISMANAGED LANDS AS THE POINT OF COMPARISON IT BECOMES POSSIBLE TO HIDE THE LONG-TERM HARM WILD OLYMPICS WILL HAVE ON THE PEOPLE OF THE PENINSULA.

    WILD OLYMPICS PROPOSES SHIFTING 23 PERCENT OF THE REMAINING WORKING FORESTS, 126,000 ACRES, FROM WORKING FORESTS TO WILDERNESS

    Guest: The problem with the Wild Olympics plan for Olympic National …

    www.seattletimes.com/…/guest-the-problem-with-the-wildolympics-plan-for-olympic

    APR 11, 2013Patty Murray’s proposal is called Wild Olympics. … way he can support passage of the Wild Olympics legislation prior to a fundamental overhaul …

    ———————————-

    The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.wildolympicsscam.com/

    stop the wild olympics, agenda 21, land grabs; will devastate rural communities.

    ————————————————

    Behind My Back | The Wild Olympics Scam

    www.behindmyback.org/category/the-wildolympicsscam/

    JUL 25, 2016THE WILD OLYMPICS PLAN is more than a fraud, a thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with …

    NOV 2016, HOW TYPICAL HOW PREDICTABLE,  HOW UNFORTUNATE, THE WA STATE RADICAL LIBERALS IN THE BIG CITIES VOTED TO RE-ELECTED SENATOR PATTY MURRAY

    ————————————————-

    Wilding the West Murrays Choice Our Sacrifice

    Posted on April 15, 2016 10:41 am by Pearl Rains Hewett Comment

    Wilding the West Murray’s Choice Our Sacrifice

    Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests and Mining Legislative Hearing

    Please click on and read the two links below.

    Someone else’s choice = your sacrifice

    “Well, if I wanted all the people out of Northern California, what would I do?”

    —————————————————————————-

    Well,  if American Voters wanted the  “WILD”  radical liberal democrats out of the WA DC swamp, what would they do?

    Nov 9, 2016,  How wonderful, how stunning, Donald J. Trump is elected President of the United States of America and Republicans control the House and the Senate

    PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRIUMPHANT ELECTION VICTORY,  SUMMED UP IN TWO WORDS “AMERICA FIRST”

    President  Donald Trump’s shortlist of candidates to lead the U.S. Department of Interior? The Department of the Interior (DOI) oversees 500 million acres of public lands.

    YOU CAN BET THAT TRUMPS NEW AMERICA FIRST, SECRETARY OF THE DOI AND EPA, SHALL BENEFIT  AMERICA FIRST. Indeed, the public land industry, public land access to millions of acres of national parks, reserves….. stretching from the Arctic to the Gulf of Mexico.

    HOW WILD IS THAT?


  • Trump Rally’s Right Side Broadcasting

    Watch Trump Rally’s LIVE stream 

    And FULL replay of Trump events

    Right Side Broadcasting – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/user/rightsideradio

    LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Albuquerque, NM 10/30/16. … Sunday, October 30 at 7:00 PM MT: Donald J. Trump will hold a rally at Atlantic Aviation located near the Albuquerque International Airport. … LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Grand Rapids, MI 10/31/16.

    Watch Donald Trump Rally Live in Grand Rapids, MI 10/31/16. A Halloween Treat.

    ———————————————————————————-

    Right Side Broadcasting – On The Right Side of History

    rsbn.tv/
    Right Side Broadcasting (RSBN) is a news and opinion site specializing in political news, video and live streaming coverage of political events.

    ———————————————————————-

    Category: Live Events – Right Side Broadcasting

    rsbn.tv/category/video/live-events/

    Donald Trump. WATCH: DONALD TRUMP, MIKE PENCE RALLY IN EAU CLAIRE, WI LIVE STREAM. … WATCH: DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN GREELEY, CO LIVE STREAM.

    ————————————————————————

    FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE

    Right Side Broadcasting | Facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/rightsidebroadcasting/

    http://rsbn.tv/ … Right Side Broadcasting. 172357 likes · 36209 talking about this. Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN) is a political news broadcasting network…

    A GREAT PLACE TO WATCH TRUMP RALLY’S LIVE

    OR WATCH FULL TRUMP RALLY REPLAYS ANYTIME, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY

    READ THE COMMENTS ON FACEBOOK AND POST YOUR OWN COMMENTS

    I WATCHED THE LIVE Stream: Donald Trump Rally in Albuquerque, NM 10/30/16. … Sunday, October 30, 2016.

    IT WAS GREAT.

    —————————————————————————-

    IN CASE YOU MISSED IT….

    How fitting Trump’s Contract to “We the People”  in historic Gettysburg, PA

    Donald J. Trump delivers groundbreaking contract for the American …

    https://www.donaldjtrump.com/…/donald-j.-trump-delivers-groundbreaking-contract-…

    Oct 22, 2016 – “What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again. It is a contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter – and …

    Presents 100-Day Plan To Make America Great Again – For Everyone

    Gettysburg, PA: Today, in historic Gettysburg, PA, Donald J. Trump presented a game-changing plan for his first 100 days in office. This revolutionary “Contract with the American Voter” will ensure that America’s economy is revitalized and citizens are protected.

    “I’m not a politician, and have never wanted to be one. But when I saw the trouble our country was in, I knew I couldn’t stand by and watch any longer. Our country has been so good to me, I love our country, I felt I had to act,” said Mr. Trump in his address.

    “Change has to come from outside this broken system. The fact that the Washington establishment has tried so hard to stop our campaign is only more proof that our campaign represents the kind of change that only arrives once in a lifetime,” he continued.

    “I am asking the American people to rise above the noise and the clutter of our broken politics, and to embrace that great faith and optimism that has always been the central ingredient in the American character. I am asking you to dream big.

    “What follows is my 100-day action plan to Make America Great Again. It is a contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter – and begins with restoring honesty, accountability and change to Washington,” he concluded.

    DONALD J. TRUMP CONTRACT WITH THE AMERICAN VOTER

    “Therefore, on the first day of my term of office, my administration will immediately pursue the following six measures to clean up the corruption and special interest collusion in Washington, DC:

    • FIRST, propose a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress;
    • SECOND, a hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health);
    • THIRD, a requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated;
    • FOURTH, a 5 year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service;
    • FIFTH, a lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government;
    • SIXTH, a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.

    On the same day, I will begin taking the following seven actions to protect American workers:

    • FIRST, I will announce my intention to renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205
    • SECOND, I will announce our withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
    • THIRD, I will direct my Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator
    • FOURTH, I will direct the Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers and direct them to use every tool under American and international law to end those abuses immediately
    • FIFTH, I will lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of job-producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
    • SIXTH, lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward
    • SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure

    Additionally, on the first day, I will take the following five actions to restore security and the constitutional rule of law:

    • FIRST, cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by President Obama
    • SECOND, begin the process of selecting a replacement for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on my list, who will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States
    • THIRD, cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities
    • FOURTH, begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back
    • FIFTH, suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered extreme vetting.

    Next, I will work with Congress to introduce the following broader legislative measures and fight for their passage within the first 100 days of my Administration:

    1. Middle Class Tax Relief And Simplification Act. An economic plan designed to grow the economy 4% per year and create at least 25 million new jobs through massive tax reduction and simplification, in combination with trade reform, regulatory relief, and lifting the restrictions on American energy. The largest tax reductions are for the middle class. A middle-class family with 2 children will get a 35% tax cut. The current number of brackets will be reduced from 7 to 3, and tax forms will likewise be greatly simplified. The business rate will be lowered from 35 to 15 percent, and the trillions of dollars of American corporate money overseas can now be brought back at a 10 percent rate.

    2. End The Offshoring Act Establishes tariffs to discourage companies from laying off their workers in order to relocate in other countries and ship their products back to the U.S. tax-free.

    3. American Energy & Infrastructure Act. Leverages public-private partnerships, and private investments through tax incentives, to spur $1 trillion in infrastructure investment over 10 years. It is revenue neutral.

    4. School Choice And Education Opportunity Act. Redirects education dollars to gives parents the right to send their kid to the public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school of their choice. Ends common core, brings education supervision to local communities. It expands vocational and technical education, and make 2 and 4-year college more affordable.

    5. Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. Fully repeals Obamacare and replaces it with Health Savings Accounts, the ability to purchase health insurance across state lines, and lets states manage Medicaid funds. Reforms will also include cutting the red tape at the FDA: there are over 4,000 drugs awaiting approval, and we especially want to speed the approval of life-saving medications.

    6. Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act. Allows Americans to deduct childcare and elder care from their taxes, incentivizes employers to provide on-site childcare services, and creates tax-free Dependent Care Savings Accounts for both young and elderly dependents, with matching contributions for low-income families.

    7. End Illegal Immigration Act Fully-funds the construction of a wall on our southern border with the full understanding that the country Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost of such wall; establishes a 2-year mandatory minimum federal prison sentence for illegally re-entering the U.S. after a previous deportation, and a 5-year mandatory minimum for illegally re-entering for those with felony convictions, multiple misdemeanor convictions or two or more prior deportations; also reforms visa rules to enhance penalties for overstaying and to ensure open jobs are offered to American workers first.

    8. Restoring Community Safety Act. Reduces surging crime, drugs and violence by creating a Task Force On Violent Crime and increasing funding for programs that train and assist local police; increases resources for federal law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors to dismantle criminal gangs and put violent offenders behind bars.

    9. Restoring National Security Act. Rebuilds our military by eliminating the defense sequester and expanding military investment; provides Veterans with the ability to receive public VA treatment or attend the private doctor of their choice; protects our vital infrastructure from cyber-attack; establishes new screening procedures for immigration to ensure those who are admitted to our country support our people and our values

    10. Clean up Corruption in Washington Act. Enacts new ethics reforms to Drain the Swamp and reduce the corrupting influence of special interests on our politics.

    On November 8th, Americans will be voting for this 100-day plan to restore prosperity to our economy, security to our communities, and honesty to our government.

    This is my pledge to you.

    And if we follow these steps, we will once more have a government of, by and for the people.”


    View the Contract With The American Voter here


  • WikiLeaks Hillary’s 2 Faces and 5 Eyes

    YEP… WikiLeaks Hillary Has 2 Faces and 5 Eyes

    The WikiLeak Scandal?

    The scandal broke in early June 2013 when the Guardian newspaper reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans.

    ——————————————————————————————

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    Seattle grounds police drone program | The Seattle Times

    www.seattletimes.com/seattle…/seattle-grounds-policedrone-progra…

    The Seattle Times

    FEB 7, 2013 – Mayor Mike McGinn has pulled the plug on the department’s controversial drone program even before it got off the ground.

    The announcement came one day after the city held a public hearing on a proposed ordinance outlining restrictions for the department’s drone program, WHICH DREW VOCAL OPPOSITION FROM NUMEROUS CITIZENS CONCERNED WITH INTRUSIONS INTO THEIR PRIVACY.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    WOW…  HILLARY THINKS SHE OWNS ALL OF THE 2016 WA STATE VOTERS

    ————————————————————————————–

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    ”NOAA testing drones to monitor Wash. Coast
    By Sandi Doughton, The Seattle Times Published: Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 10:13 am
    Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

    THE SCIENTIFIC USE OF DRONES HASN’T YET DRAWN THE SAME TYPE OF PRIVACY CONCERNS THAT FORCED THE SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO WAREHOUSE ITS UNMANNED AIRCRAFT.

     SEVERAL STATES, INCLUDING IDAHO AND MONTANA, ENACTED RESTRICTIONS THIS YEAR ON THE USE OF DRONES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OR TO SPY ON PEOPLE.

    ———————————————————————–

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    July 17, 2013,

    After so many instances of government snooping, like the National Security Agency combing through phone and Internet records, Hewett said she doesn’t trust scientists who say the images and data they collect will be used only for research.

    ———————————————

    Behind My Back | Drone on Big Brother

    www.behindmyback.org/2013/07/23/drone-on-bigbrother/

    Jul 23, 2013It disturbs me that this is what my grandchildren and great-grandchildren are going to be living with,” Hewett said. “A Big Brother society that is … watching you everywhere.

    —————————

    Behind My Back | NSA’s Gotta YOTTABYTE?

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/01/19/nsas-gotta-yottabyte/

    Jan 19, 2014 – Jul 24, 2013 – A guide from Cisco explains that a yottabyte = 1,000 …

    AND, What NSA can’t do now, it will certainly be able to do in a half …

    ———————————————————————————

    Hmmm… DRONES FOR RESEARCH

     AND WIKILEAKS OTHER USES FOR DRONES?

     WikiLeaks NOVEMBER 23, 2010 THE PRIVATE FACE OF HILLARY AND HER SERVER

    Report: Clinton mulled killing Wikileaks’ Julian Assange with drone strike

    Tuesday NOVEMBER 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. Clinton met with staff on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010.

    Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables.

    Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination.

    That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

    “CAN’T WE JUST DRONE THIS GUY?” CLINTON OPENLY INQUIRED, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources.

    The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said.

    Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases,

    —————————————————–

    …[E]mails previously released from Clinton’s private server reveal Anne Marie Slaughter, a former director of policy planning at the State Department, sent an email on the same day in 2010 on the subject of possible “nonlegal strategies” for dealing with WikiLeaks. That email also notes that a meeting was held that day to discuss WikiLeaks.

    THE PUBLIC MIGHT INSTINCTIVELY FEEL THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG

    ————————————————————————–

    The two faces of Hillary PUBLIC AND PRIVATE

    THE  “FIVE EYES” of Hillary

    CLASSIFIED TWO LEVELS ABOVE TOP SECRET

    THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE MEMBERS,  UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.

    2011 OCT. 11: WIKILEAKS, DOCUMENTS, I.E. THE MERKEL DOCUMENT IS CLASSIFIED TWO LEVELS ABOVE TOP SECRET, AN INDICATOR THAT THE MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED HIGHLY SENSITIVE.

    NOTE: 2011 OCT. 11: HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON WAS THE SECRETARY OF STATE

    EVEN SO, IT IS CLEARED FOR SHARING WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF

    THE US-LED “FIVE EYES” SPYING ALLIANCE OF UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND.

    ————————————————————————————–

    I found this 44 page document by Glenn Greenwald online

    NO PLACE TO HIDE  [PDF] NPTH-03-WIDE.PDF

    https://cryptome.wikileaks.org/2014/05/npth-03.pdf

    OFFENSIVE CYBER-OPERATIONS, WERE AMONG THE US GOVERNMENT’S …. 2011 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE FIVE EYES ALLIANCE, for … clear that the British spy agency also uses this phrase to … For each individual country, the NSA also produces a daily.

    —————————————————————————-

    WikiLeaks… Boundless “FIVE EYES” cyber spying Information in a 30 day period IN 2013  on emails and phone calls?

    COLLECTING 96 billion emails and 124 billion phone calls from around the world.

    in JUST a 30 day period in 2013.

    Today is Oct 26, 2016 HOW MUCH CYBER SPYING DATA HAS BEEN COLLECTED SINCE 2013?

    THERE IS NO PRACTICAL “HUMAN” APPLICATION FOR THAT AMOUNT OF SECRET DATA FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.

    ————————————————————————–

    Remember,  Hillary Clinton served as United States Secretary of State, under President Barack Obama, from 2009 to 2013, overseeing the department that conducted the Foreign policy of Barack Obama. She was preceded in office by Condoleezza Rice, and succeeded by John Kerry.

    ———————————————————————————

    NO PLACE TO HIDE

    Edward Snowden the NSA and the US surveillance state

    Dedicated to those many who have sought to shine light on the US governments secret mass surveillance state.

     The vast majority of the files in the archive were designated as “TOP SECRET”. Most of these were marked “FVERY” meaning that they were approved for distribution only to NSA’S four closest surveillance allies UK, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND….

     Boundless Information in a 30 day period on emails and phone calls?

    96 billion emails and 124 billion phone calls from around the world.

    Germany 500 million, Brazil 2.3 billion, India 13.5 billion, France 70 million, Spain 60 million, Italy 47 billion…….

    ——————————————————————

    Just saying Seattle’s $82,000 invasion of privacy drones,

    Paid for with American tax dollars ended up as……

    A ‘Gift’ for the LAPD: Two Surveillance Drones Kicked Out of Seattle …

    motherboard.vice.com/read/lapd-seattle-surveillance-drones

    Vice Jun 4, 2014 – Last week, the Los Angeles police department announced a new … As the press release emphasizes, these drones didn’t cost Los Angeles a cent. … criticism for failing to inform city hall about its drone purchases for more than a year. … SPD and the Department of Homeland Security, which paid $82,000 to …

    —————————————————–

    The bottom line when you VOTE for president

    VOTE FOR DONALD J. TRUMP

    What you see is what you get, one face and two eyes, keenly focused on AMERICA


  • Trump Fundamental Truth 1787-2016

     Trump Fundamental Truth  1787-2016

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    Reacting to the explosion Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, said:

    “It’s a terrible thing what’s going on in our world, what’s going on in our country, but we are going to get tough and smart and vigilant and we are going to end it.”

    —————————————————————

    Full Speech: Donald Trump Rally in Colorado Springs, CO (9/17/2016 …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBJBTUBM8ds
    17 hours ago – Uploaded by Donald Trump Speeches & Events

    WATCH LIVE: Donald Trump Rally in Colorado Springs, CO at JetCenters of Colorado (9/17/2016) – Full …

     

    ————————————————————————

    We hold these truths to be self evident. America is a nation, attacked by external force and convulsed by domestic insurrections.

    That is exactly why the Trump is up in the Polls.

    ———————————————————————–

    New York blast ‘obviously an act of terrorism,’ Cuomo says – CNN.com

    www.cnn.com/2016/09/18/us/new-yorkexplosion/
    CNN

    6 mins ago – New York (CNN) [Breaking news update at 12:35 p.m. ET]. FBI investigators are still collecting evidence from the scene of a bombing Saturday …

    Sept 19, 2016 We hold these truths to be self evident.

    ——————————————————-

    1787  The United States of America

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    At the time of its founding, the United States was a weak and fledgling nation, unique in claiming its republican institutions, extremely vulnerable to the great powers that dominated the world. Its objectives were to strengthen its constitutional government, build an adequate military capacity to defend itself, and, if possible, remove European influence from the North American continent.

    If America failed in this, Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 11, it would become “the instrument of European greatness.

    ” But if it succeeded, it would be “superior to the control of all transatlantic force or influence and be able to dictate the terms of the connection between the old and the new world.”

    Alexander Hamilton essay’s MAIN PURPOSE IS TO FORCE CITIZENS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING compared with the ideas of the Constitution.

    However, Hamilton knows the difficulty of convincing someone to replace something they are comfortable with. He reminds the people of how they “depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” and PRESENTS THEM WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”. Hamilton even states that if the Constitution was not ratified, the existing Union would be completely destroyed.

    Alexander Hamilton writes THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”

    —————————————————————————————

    Constitution for the United States of America

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    ———————————————————————————–

    A great example of the Founders’ prudence is their early foreign policy. It is often said that the American Founders were isolationists and that the principle of their FOREIGN POLICY was to withdraw from the world in favor of focusing solely on the home front.

    ——————————————————————————

    A great example of the Trump’s prudence is his foreign policy.

    “Trump Americanization not Globalization”

     Trumps objectives strengthen Americas  constitutional government,

    Build an adequate military capacity to defend itself

    And, remove the globalization of the European Union, United Nations rule etal. from the United States of America.

    TRUMP WILL BUILD A WALL

    And  focus  solely on America’s  home front.

    Trump “My FOREIGN POLICY WILL ALWAYS put the interests of the American people and American security first.”

    Trump “No American citizen WILL EVER AGAIN feel that their needs come second to the citizens of foreign countries”

    TRUMP PRESENTS AMERICAN CITIZENS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”

    TRUMPS FIRST PURPOSE IS “TRUTH”, TO INFORM AMERICA CITIZENS SO THEY WILL UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING

    TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY EMPHASIZED THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”

    ———————————————————–

    Trump will be a President of Constitutional Law and Order for We the People of the United States

    Trump America First

    1. Trump shall Establish American JUSTICE First
    2. Trump shall Insure America’s DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY First
    3. Trump shall Provide for America’s COMMON DEFENSE First
    4. Trump shall Promote America’s GENERAL WELFARE First
    5. Trump shall Secure THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY to American’s First
    6. Trump shall Secure THE BLESSINGS OF POSTERITY to American’s First

    ——————————————————————–

    Trump Fundamental Truth  1787-2016

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    —————————————————————-

    We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering Our Principles, Reclaiming …

    https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1497636477

    Matthew Spalding – 2014 – ‎Political Science

    If America failed in this, Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 11, it would become “the instrument of European greatness.” But if it succeeded, it would be …

    ————————————————————-

    Federalist Papers Summaries Flashcards | Quizlet

    https://quizlet.com/45647368/federalist-papers-summaries-flash-cards/

    Quizlet

    Alexander Hamilton of New York asked James Madison of Virginia and John Jay to help him persuade the New York convention to ratify …. The Federalist 11 … 15, Hamilton warns citizens that the states are on the verge of national humiliation.

    ————————————————————————

     United States of America 1787

    “Remarks of James Wilson in the Pennsylvania Convention to Ratify the Constitution of the United States, 1787,”

    The United States now exhibit to the world,

    the first instance, as far as we can learn,

    of a nation,

    unattacked by external force,

    unconvulsed by domestic insurrections,

    assembling voluntarily, deliberating fully, and deciding calmly, concerning that system of government,

    under which they would wish that they and their posterity should live.[35]

    ————————————————————-

    The bottom line…

    Sept 19, 2016 We hold these truths to be self evident.

    America is a nation, attacked by external force and convulsed by domestic insurrections

     TRUMP PRESENTS AMERICAN CITIZENS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”

    TRUMPS FIRST PURPOSE IS “TRUTH”, TO INFORM AMERICA CITIZENS SO THEY WILL UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING

    TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY EMPHASIZED THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”


  • Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Why American Citizens are VOTING FOR TRUMP and dumping the establishments politicians right and left.

    Full unedited  text

    9/11, 1990 President George H. W. Bush’s  New World Order Address

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    millercenter.org/president/bush/speeches/speech-3425

    Transcript

    Mr. President and Mr. Speaker and Members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, fellow Americans, thank you very much for that warm welcome. We gather tonight, witness to events in the Persian Gulf as significant as they are tragic. In the early morning hours of August 2d, following negotiations and promises by Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein not to use force, a powerful Iraqi army invaded its trusting and much weaker neighbor, Kuwait. Within 3 days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. IT WAS THEN THAT I DECIDED TO ACT TO CHECK THAT AGGRESSION.
    At this moment, our brave servicemen and women stand watch in that distant desert and on distant seas, side by side with the forces of more than 20 other nations. They are some of the finest men and women of the United States of America. And they’re doing one terrific job. These valiant Americans were ready at a moment’s notice to leave their spouses and their children, to serve on the front line halfway around the world. They remind us who keeps America strong: they do. In the trying circumstances of the Gulf, the morale of our service men and women is excellent. In the face of danger, they’re brave, they’re well-trained, and dedicated.
    A soldier, Private First Class Wade Merritt of Knoxville, Tennessee, now stationed in Saudi Arabia, wrote his parents of his worries, his love of family, and his hope for peace. But Wade also wrote, “I am proud of my country and its firm stance against inhumane aggression. I am proud of my army and its men. I am proud to serve my country.” Well, let me just say, Wade, America is proud of you and is grateful to every soldier, sailor, marine, and airman serving the cause of peace in the Persian Gulf. I also want to thank the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Powell; the Chiefs here tonight; our commander in the Persian Gulf, General Schwartzkopf; and the men and women of the Department of Defense. What a magnificent job you all are doing. And thank you very, very much from a grateful people. I wish I could say that their work is done. But we all know it’s not.
    So, if there ever was a time to put country before self and patriotism before party, the time is now. And let me thank all Americans, especially those here in this Chamber tonight, for your support for our armed forces and for their mission. That support will be even more important in the days to come. So, tonight I want to talk to you about what’s at stake—what we must do together to defend civilized values around the world and maintain our economic strength at home.
    Our objectives in the Persian Gulf are clear, our goals defined and familiar: Iraq must withdraw from Kuwait completely, immediately, and without condition. Kuwait’s legitimate government must be restored. The security and stability of the Persian Gulf must be assured. And American citizens abroad must be protected. These goals are not ours alone. They’ve been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council five times in as many weeks. Most countries share our concern for principle. And many have a stake in the stability of the Persian Gulf. This is not, as Saddam Hussein would have it, the United States against Iraq. It is Iraq against the world.
    As you know, I’ve just returned from a very productive meeting with Soviet President Gorbachev. And I am pleased that we are working together to build a new relationship. In Helsinki, our joint statement affirmed to the world our shared resolve to counter Iraq’s threat to peace. Let me quote: “We are united in the belief that Iraq’s aggression must not be tolerated. No peaceful international order is possible if larger states can devour their smaller neighbors.” Clearly, no longer can a dictator count on East-West confrontation to stymie concerted United Nations action against aggression. A new partnership of nations has begun.
    We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.
    The test we face is great, and so are the stakes. This is the first assault on the new world that we seek, the first test of our mettle. Had we not responded to this first provocation with clarity of purpose, if we do not continue to demonstrate our determination, it would be a signal to actual and potential despots around the world. America and the world must defend common vital interests—and we will. America and the world must support the rule of law—and we will. America and the world must stand up to aggression—and we will. And one thing more: In the pursuit of these goals America will not be intimidated.
    Vital issues of principle are at stake. Saddam Hussein is literally trying to wipe a country off the face of the Earth. We do not exaggerate. Nor do we exaggerate when we say Saddam Hussein will fail. Vital economic interests are at risk as well. Iraq itself controls some 10 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves. Iraq plus Kuwait controls twice that. An Iraq permitted to swallow Kuwait would have the economic and military power, as well as the arrogance, to intimidate and coerce its neighbors—neighbors who control the lion’s share of the world’s remaining oil reserves. We cannot permit a resource so vital to be dominated by one so ruthless. And we won’t.
    Recent events have surely proven that there is no substitute for American leadership. In the face of tyranny, let no one doubt American credibility and reliability. Let no one doubt our staying power. We will stand by our friends. One way or another, the leader of Iraq must learn this fundamental truth. From the outset, acting hand in hand with others, we’ve sought to fashion the broadest possible international response to Iraq’s aggression. The level of world cooperation and condemnation of Iraq is unprecedented. Armed forces from countries spanning four continents are there at the request of King Fahd of Saudi Arabia to deter and, if need be, to defend against attack. Moslems and non-Moslems, Arabs and non-Arabs, soldiers from many nations stand shoulder to shoulder, resolute against Saddam Hussein’s ambitions.
    We can now point to five United Nations Security Council resolutions that condemn Iraq’s aggression. They call for Iraq’s immediate and unconditional withdrawal, the restoration of Kuwait’s legitimate government, and categorically reject Iraq’s cynical and self-serving attempt to annex Kuwait. Finally, the United Nations has demanded the release of all foreign nationals held hostage against their will and in contravention of international law. It is a mockery of human decency to call these people “guests.” They are hostages, and the whole world knows it.
    Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a dependable ally, said it all: “We do not bargain over hostages. We will not stoop to the level of using human beings as bargaining chips ever.” Of course, of course, our hearts go out to the hostages and to their families. But our policy cannot change, and it will not change. America and the world will not be blackmailed by this ruthless policy.
    We’re now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders. We owe much to the outstanding leadership of Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar. The United Nations is backing up its words with action. The Security Council has imposed mandatory economic sanctions on Iraq, designed to force Iraq to relinquish the spoils of its illegal conquest. The Security Council has also taken the decisive step of authorizing the use of all means necessary to ensure compliance with these sanctions. Together with our friends and allies, ships of the United States Navy are today patrolling Mideast waters. They’ve already intercepted more than 700 ships to enforce the sanctions. Three regional leaders I spoke with just yesterday told me that these sanctions are working. Iraq is feeling the heat. We continue to hope that Iraq’s leaders will recalculate just what their aggression has cost them. They are cut off from world trade, unable to sell their oil. And only a tiny fraction of goods gets through.
    The communique with President Gorbachev made mention of what happens when the embargo is so effective that children of Iraq literally need milk or the sick truly need medicine. Then, under strict international supervision that guarantees the proper destination, then food will be permitted.
    At home, the material cost of our leadership can be steep. That’s why Secretary of State Baker and Treasury Secretary Brady have met with many world leaders to underscore that the burden of this collective effort must be shared. We are prepared to do our share and more to help carry that load; we insist that others do their share as well.
    The response of most of our friends and allies has been good. To help defray costs, the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE—the United Arab Emirates—have pledged to provide our deployed troops with all the food and fuel they need. Generous assistance will also be provided to stalwart front-line nations, such as Turkey and Egypt. I am also heartened to report that this international response extends to the neediest victims of this conflict—those refugees. For our part, we’ve contributed $28 million for relief efforts. This is but a portion of what is needed. I commend, in particular, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and several European nations who have joined us in this purely humanitarian effort.
    There’s an energy-related cost to be borne as well. Oil-producing nations are already replacing lost Iraqi and Kuwaiti output. More than half of what was lost has been made up. And we’re getting superb cooperation. If producers, including the United States, continue steps to expand oil and gas production, we can stabilize prices and guarantee against hardship. Additionally, we and several of our allies always have the option to extract oil from our strategic petroleum reserves if conditions warrant. As I’ve pointed out before, conservation efforts are essential to keep our energy needs as low as possible. And we must then take advantage of our energy sources across the board: coal, natural gas, hydro, and nuclear. Our failure to do these things has made us more dependent on foreign oil than ever before. Finally, let no one even contemplate profiteering from this crisis. We will not have it.
    I cannot predict just how long it will take to convince Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. Sanctions will take time to have their full intended effect. We will continue to review all options with our allies, but let it be clear: we will not let this aggression stand.
    Our interest, our involvement in the Gulf is not transitory. It predated Saddam Hussein’s aggression and will survive it. Long after all our troops come home—and we all hope it’s soon, very soon—there will be a lasting role for the United States in assisting the nations of the Persian Gulf. Our role then: to deter future aggression. Our role is to help our friends in their own self-defense. And something else: to curb the proliferation of chemical, biological, ballistic missile and, above all, nuclear technologies.
    Let me also make clear that the United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people. Our quarrel is with Iraq’s dictator and with his aggression. Iraq will not be permitted to annex Kuwait. That’s not a threat, that’s not a boast, that’s just the way it’s going to be.
    Our ability to function effectively as a great power abroad depends on how we conduct ourselves at home. Our economy, our Armed Forces, our energy dependence, and our cohesion all determine whether we can help our friends and stand up to our foes. For America to lead, America must remain strong and vital. Our world leadership and domestic strength are mutual and reinforcing; a woven piece, strongly bound as Old Glory. To revitalize our leadership, our leadership capacity, we must address our budget deficit—not after election day, or next year, but now.
    Higher oil prices slow our growth, and higher defense costs would only make our fiscal deficit problem worse. That deficit was already greater than it should have been—a projected $232 billion for the coming year. It must—it will—be reduced.
    To my friends in Congress, together we must act this very month—before the next fiscal year begins on October 1st—to get America’s economic house in order. The Gulf situation helps us realize we are more economically vulnerable than we ever should be. Americans must never again enter any crisis, economic or military, with an excessive dependence on foreign oil and an excessive burden of Federal debt.
    Most Americans are sick and tired of endless battles in the Congress and between the branches over budget matters. It is high time we pulled together and get the job done right. It’s up to us to straighten this out. This job has four basic parts. First, the Congress should, this month, within a budget agreement, enact growth-oriented tax measures—to help avoid recession in the short term and to increase savings, investment, productivity, and competitiveness for the longer term. These measures include extending incentives for research and experimentation; expanding the use of IRA’s for new homeowners; establishing tax-deferred family savings accounts; creating incentives for the creation of enterprise zones and initiatives to encourage more domestic drilling; and, yes, reducing the tax rate on capital gains.
    And second, the Congress should, this month, enact a prudent multiyear defense program, one that reflects not only the improvement in East-West relations but our broader responsibilities to deal with the continuing risks of outlaw action and regional conflict. Even with our obligations in the Gulf, a sound defense budget can have some reduction in real terms; and we’re prepared to accept that. But to go beyond such levels, where cutting defense would threaten our vital margin of safety, is something I will never accept. The world is still dangerous. And surely, that is now clear. Stability’s not secure. American interests are far reaching. Interdependence has increased. The consequences of regional instability can be global. This is no time to risk America’s capacity to protect her vital interests.
    And third, the Congress should, this month, enact measures to increase domestic energy production and energy conservation in order to reduce dependence on foreign oil. These measures should include my proposals to increase incentives for domestic oil and gas exploration, fuel-switching, and to accelerate the development of the Alaskan energy resources without damage to wildlife. As you know, when the oil embargo was imposed in the early 1970’s, the United States imported almost 6 million barrels of oil a day. This year, before the Iraqi invasion, U.S. imports had risen to nearly 8 million barrels per day. And we’d moved in the wrong direction. And now we must act to correct that trend.
    And fourth, the Congress should, this month, enact a 5-year program to reduce the projected debt and deficits by $500 billion—that’s by half a trillion dollars. And if, with the Congress, we can develop a satisfactory program by the end of the month, we can avoid the ax of sequester—deep across-the-board cuts that would threaten our military capacity and risk substantial domestic disruption. I want to be able to tell the American people that we have truly solved the deficit problem. And for me to do that, a budget agreement must meet these tests: It must include the measures I’ve recommended to increase economic growth and reduce dependence on foreign oil. It must be fair. All should contribute, but the burden should not be excessive for any one group of programs or people. It must address the growth of government’s hidden liabilities. It must reform the budget process and, further, it must be real.
    I urge Congress to provide a comprehensive 5-year deficit reduction program to me as a complete legislative package, with measures to assure that it can be fully enforced. America is tired of phony deficit reduction or promise-now, save-later plans. It is time for a program that is credible and real. And finally, to the extent that the deficit reduction program includes new revenue measures, it must avoid any measure that would threaten economic growth or turn us back toward the days of punishing income tax rates. That is one path we should not head down again.
    I have been pleased with recent progress, although it has not always seemed so smooth. But now it’s time to produce. I hope we can work out a responsible plan. But with or without agreement from the budget summit, I ask both Houses of the Congress to allow a straight up-or-down vote on a complete $500-billion deficit reduction package not later than September 28. If the Congress cannot get me a budget, then Americans will have to face a tough, mandated sequester. I’m hopeful, in fact, I’m confident that the Congress will do what it should. And I can assure you that we in the executive branch will do our part.
    In the final analysis, our ability to meet our responsibilities abroad depends upon political will and consensus at home. This is never easy in democracies, for we govern only with the consent of the governed. And although free people in a free society are bound to have their differences, Americans traditionally come together in times of adversity and challenge.
    Once again, Americans have stepped forward to share a tearful goodbye with their families before leaving for a strange and distant shore. At this very moment, they serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That’s why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun. If they can come together under such adversity, if old adversaries like the Soviet Union and the United States can work in common cause, then surely we who are so fortunate to be in this great Chamber—Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives—can come together to fulfill our responsibilities here.
    Thank you. Good night. And God bless the United States of America.


  • Elect Trump What have you got to lose?

    Lose Lying’ Hillary

    Lose the Benghazi liar

    Lose the pay to play Clinton Foundation

    Lose the creeping Crud in the U.S.A.

    Lose the best government money can buy

    Lose the rigged elections

    Lose the super pacts

    Lose the establishments career politicians

    Lose the politicians insider trading

    Lose the politico establishments nepotism

    Lose the politico establishments cronyism

    Lose Obama’s Justice Department

    Lose the FBI’s run and hide

    Lose the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    Lose the global money control of BIS’s and ECC

    Lose the Global  too big to fail Federal Reserve

    Lose the rigged, lying partisan politico news media

    Lose the sanctuary cities

    Lose the open borders

    Lose the criminal  immigrants first

    Lose the revolving door

    Lose the press one for English

    Lose the lawless disorder

    Lose the illegal foreign immigrants invading our country

    Lose the ISIS radicalization in American prisons.

    Lose Shari law upheld in the American Judicial system

    Lose Appointed Judges

    Lose lying’ non-partisan candidates

    Lose the illegal immigrants that are stealing American jobs

    Lose the WRAP immigration program

    Lose the burkas

    Lose poverty in America

    Lose the homeless crisis in America

    Lose hunger in America

    Lose the long lines at community food banks

    Lose America’s crumbling infrastructure

    Lose corrupt establishment politicians

    Lose lead poisoned drinking water

    Lose the Criminal Catch and Release program

    Lose the alien killers, rapist

    Lose the cop Killers

    Lose the Mexican Cartel Heroin

    Lose the Mexican drug lords

    Lose the drug dealing Gangs

    Lose the horrific Mexican Heroin epidemic

    Lose the radical Islamic terrorists

    Lose the workplace beheading violence

    Lose the killing in gun free zones

    Lose the drive by killers

    Lose Obamacare

    Lose the $6000.00 Obamacare deductible

    Lose the greedy pharmaceutical  companies

    Lose the legally prescribed overdosing of opiate dependency

    Lose the drugging of American toddlers thru teens

    Lose the pills that kill in school shootings

    Lose Obama’s executive orders

    Lose Common core (indoctrination) education

    Lose the propaganda of non-traditional taught to American school kids

    Lose the bad trade deals

    Lose the establishment that plays while we pay

    Lose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    Lose the business killing rules and regulations

    Lose the taxes, tolls and fees

    Lose the working poor

    Lose the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

    Lose Global NGO sue and settle

    Lose America’s  slavery to the United Nations

    Lose the UN Hague decision

    Lose the taxpayer cash funding of terrorist country’s

    Lose the $20 Trillion Dollar National Debt

    Lose the liberals deep pockets credit cards

    Lose the UN Global Climate Change program

    Lose the taxpayers foreign aid program

    Lose the Veteran’s Abuse (VA) program

    Lose Obama’s  executive orders  Public land Grabs

    Lose Obama’s  monumental  landgrabbing  frenzy

    Lose the UNESCO control of American Public Land

    Lose the NGO Trusts that Grab Public land

    Lose the grants that fund Global NGO’S

    Lose the Agenda 21 Globalists agenda

    Lose the New World Order

    —————————————————-

    I’m voting for Trump

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Constructional Rights

    We the People shall NOT Lose our second Amendment Right

    We the People shall NOT Lose our Declaration of Independence

    We the People shall NOT Lose our America’s sovereignty

    Behind our backs behind closed doors

    ———————————————–

    With Donald J. Trump as President of the United States Of America

    We the people shall have a government of the people, by the people and for the people

    And, we the people shall have one nation under God with liberty and justice for all


  • The Failure of Foreign Aid 1946-2016

    The Continuing Failure of U.S. Foreign Aid 1946-2016

    Respond to Syria Crisis

    July 13, 2016 Highlights

    U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry announces nearly $439 million in new U.S. Government (USG) humanitarian funding for Syria and neighboring countries. Fact Sheet Office of the Spokesperson Washington, DC

    THIS NEW FUNDING BRINGS U.S. HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE IN RESPONSE TO THIS CONFLICT TO MORE THAN $5.1 BILLION SINCE THE START OF THE CRISIS.

    SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY PLEDGED ABOUT $890 MILLION IN AID TO SYRIA AND NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES ON THURSDAY,

    A COMMITMENT THAT WILL MAINTAIN WASHINGTON’S POSITION AS THE SINGLE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO THE FIVE-YEAR CIVIL WAR.

    ————————————————————————–

    AUG 26, 2016, SO AFTER MORE THAN $5.1 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYERS DOLLARS FOR WASHINGTON DC’S CONTINUING POLICY FOR HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO SYRIA,  SINCE THE START OF THE FIVE-YEAR CIVIL WAR.

    American foreign aid still suffers the same problems it did when Kennedy took office in 1961. Despite countless reforms, foreign aid is still a failure.

    The American people are witness to, and paying for the Continuing Failure of WASHINGTON DC’S Foreign Aid policy 1946-2016.

    AS TRUMP WOULD SAY ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN MAKING VERY BAD DEAL FOR AMERICA, FOR 70 YEARS.

    The bottom line….

    VOTE FOR DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 2016.

    WHY?

    Because, You can always count on Americans to do the right thing – after they’ve tried everything else. Winston Churchill

    ——————————————————————-

    Government Accountability Office 1982

    ID-82-36: Published: Jun 15, 1982. Publicly Released: Jun 15, 1982.

    Government Accountability Office 2016?

    ———————————————————————-

    VOTE FOR TRUMP IN THE OVAL OFFICE FOR AN ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT 2016

    ———————————————————————

    THE UNITED STATES REMAINS THE WORLD’S LARGEST BILATERAL DONOR OF ECONOMIC AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE.

    WHAT DID TRUMP SAY ABOUT NATO?

    U.S. Gives Financial Aid to 96% of All Countries – Forbe

    www.forbes.com/sites/othercomments/…/u-s-gives-financial-aid-to-96-of-all-countries/

    How much money is spent on foreign aid? U.S. Gives Financial Aid to 96% of All Countries.
    ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, “THE UNITED STATES REMAINED THE WORLD’S LARGEST BILATERAL DONOR, OBLIGATING approximately $48.4 billion$31.2 billion in economic assistance and $17.2 billion in military assistance.”

    ———————————————————————-

    REMEMBER… THIS IS AMERICAN TAXPAYERS MONEY, BILLIONS  AND BILLIONS, IN FACT TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS SPENT IN THE LAST 70 YEARS.

    WA DC DIPLOMATIC FOREIGN AID POLICY 1946-2016?

    IF THERE’S A GLOBAL PROBLEM?

    THROW AMERICAN TAXPAYERS MONEY AT IT.

    ———————————————————————-

    The Continuing Failure of Foreign Aid | Cato Institute

    www.cato.org/publications/policy…/continuing-failure-foreignaid

    full text below

    ————————————————————————

    Why U.S. Foreign Aid Fails – National Center for Policy Analysis

    www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/?Article_ID=23228

    National Center for Policy Analysis

    full text below

    ——————————————————————–

    The following website is difficult to navigate.

    I’ll walk you through it.

    Click on the link below

    scroll down to the blue box

    countries that receive the most foreign aid,

    click on it.

    Now you are in starting with #25  countries that receive the most total foreign assistance from the U.S..

    The dollar amounts in the boxes are the cumulative total of foreign aid given to each country from 1946-2014. Dollar figures in the story are inflation-adjusted to 2014.

    FOR CLARIFICATION

    The cumulative total of foreign aid 1946-2014  given to Sudan $263,922,519

    #25 – Sudan

    In (by)  2014, Sudan received a total of $263,922,519 in foreign assistance from the U.S.

    That full amount in 2014 was in economic aid; the U.S. did not provide any military aid to Sudan in 2014.

    When you hover on the year on the graphs, you will find the amount of U.S. foreign aid given to Sudan during that year.

    For example in 2007 Sudan received U.S. economic aid in the amount of $860 million and an additional $413 million in military spending.

    ———————————————————————–

    Countries That Receive the Most Foreign Aid From the U.S. | InsideGov

    usforeignaid.insidegov.com/stories/14502/countriesreceivemostforeignaid

    Jun 15, 2016 – InsideGov ranked the 25 countries that receive the most total foreign assistance from the U.S.. By Palmer Gibbs on June 15, 2016

    Using the most recent data available from USAID. the UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, InsideGov ranked the 25 countries that receive the most total foreign assistance from the U.S.

    The wide array of foreign policy positions and ideas indicate there are a lot of ways the United States can be involved on the international stage. With this in mind, Graphiq politics site InsideGov decided to examine which countries receive the most foreign aid from the U.S. Using the most recent data available from the United States Agency for International Development, InsideGov ranked the 25 countries that receive the most total foreign financial assistance (the cumulative total) from 1946-2016

    from the U.S., listing countries from smallest to largest total received.

    Foreign assistance includes loans, contracts and grants, but not debt forgiveness.

    THE DATA SOURCE CATEGORIZES ASSISTANCE AS EITHER ECONOMIC OR MILITARY, AND COVERS (the cumulative total) U.S. ASSISTANCE FROM 1946 TO 2014.

    Dollar figures in the story are inflation-adjusted to 2014.

    Source: USAIDAS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

    ——————————————————————————-

    The following study concludes with an analysis of why U.S. foreign aid has failed in the past and why it will most likely fail in the future.

    Military aid and security assistance is a different issue and is not examined here.

    The Continuing Failure of Foreign Aid | Cato Institute

    www.cato.org/publications/policy…/continuing-failure-foreignaid

    Cato Institute

    by J Bovard – ‎Cited by 40 – ‎Related articles

    For 40 years, U.S. foreign aid has been judged by its intentions, not its results. … American foreign aid still suffers the same problems it did when Kennedy took …

    Policy Analysis No. 65

    The Continuing Failure of Foreign Aid 1946-2016

    By James Bovard

    January 31, 1986

    Executive Summary

    For 40 years, U.S. foreign aid has been judged by its intentions, not its results. Foreign aid programs have been perpetuated and expanded not because they have succeeded, but because giving foreign aid still seems like a good idea. But foreign aid has rarely done anything that countries could not have done for themselves. And it has often encouraged the recipient governments’ worst tendencies—helping to underwrite programs and policies that have starved thousands of people and derailed struggling economies.

    In agriculture, in economic planning, in food assistance, U.S. foreign aid has routinely failed to benefit the foreign poor. In Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) has dotted the countryside with “white elephants”: idle cement plants, near-empty convention centers, abandoned roads, and—perhaps the biggest white elephant of them all—a growing phalanx of corrupt, meddling, and overpaid bureaucrats.

    Since 1946, the United States has given over $146 billion in humanitarian assistance to foreign countries. In 1985, the United States provided over $10 billion in non-military aid abroad, ranging from free food to balance-of-payments support to project-assistance and population-planning programs. AID employs over 4,500 employees to administer these programs, many of which have expanded rapidly under the Reagan administration.

    Americans have a long tradition of generously aiding the victims of foreign earthquakes, famines, and wars. Before World War II, private citizens provided almost all of America’s foreign assistance. After World War II, the Truman administration decided that a larger, more centralized effort was necessary to revitalize the war-torn economies of Europe. Economic planning was the rage in Washington in the late 1940s, and Marshall Plan administrators exported their new-found panacea. The Marshall Plan poured over $13 billion into Europe and coincided with an economic revival across the continent. The best analysis indicates that Europe would have recovered regardless of U.S. aid, and that the clearest effect of the Marshall Plan was to increase the recipient governments’ control of their economies.[1]

    The apparent success of the Marshall Plan led Truman in 1949 to propose his Point Four Program to provide a smaller version of the Marshall Plan for poor countries in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America. Truman declared that Point Four would be “a bold new program for making the benefits of our scientific advances and industrial progress available for the improvement and growth of undeveloped areas.”[2]

    In the 1950s, the Eisenhower administration downplayed humanitarian aid, concentrating on security assistance to strategic allies. In 1954, Sen. Hubert H. Humphrey pushed the Food For Peace program through Congress, but that was the largest innovation in economic assistance during the decade. When John F. Kennedy took the helm in 1961, the stage was set for a huge expansion of foreign aid. In a special message to Congress, Kennedy called for “a dramatic turning point in the troubled history of foreign aid” and proclaimed that the sixties would be the “decade of development”—“the period when many less- developed nations make the transition into self-sustaining growth.” Kennedy placed heavy stress on the willingness of recipient governments “to undertake necessary internal reform and self-help.”[3] In 1961, AID was created, and the U.S. foreign aid bureaucracy came into its own.

    Despite Kennedy’s stress on requiring reforms from recipient governments, foreign aid routinely went to countries pursuing policies destined to turn them into permanent economic cripples. Partly as a result of a widespread perception that such aid was usually wasted, it consistently ranked as one of the least popular government programs with the American public.[4]

    From the mid-sixties to the early seventies, South Vietnam received the bulk of U.S. economic aid. In 1973, Congress, concerned about the ineffectiveness of U.S. aid, heavily revised aid-program goals to focus more on social services and less on economic development.

    When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, many observers expected a thorough reform of U.S. foreign aid. Reagan declared in a major speech before the annual meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, “Unless a nation puts its own financial and economic house in order, no amount of aid will produce progress.”[5] Since then, despite Reagan’s tough rhetoric on requiring reform from recipient governments, little has changed. American foreign aid still suffers the same problems it did when Kennedy took office in 1961. Despite countless reforms, foreign aid is still a failure.

    Instead of breaking the “endless cycle of poverty,” foreign aid has become the opiate of the Third World. AID and other donors have encouraged Third World governments to rely on handouts instead of on themselves for development. No matter how irresponsible, corrupt, or oppressive a Third World government may be, there is always some Western government or international agency anxious to supply it with a few more million dollars. By subsidizing political irresponsibility and pernicious policies, foreign aid ill serves the world’s poor.

    American foreign aid has often harmed the Third World poor. In Indonesia, the government confiscated subsistence farmers’ meager plots for AID-financed irrigation canals. In Mali, farmers were forced to sell their crops at giveaway prices to a joint project of AID and the Mali government. In Egypt, Haiti, and elsewhere, farmers have seen the prices for their own crops nose-dive when U.S. free food has been given to their countries.

    AID cannot be blamed for all the mistakes made in the projects it bankrolls. However, by providing a seemingly endless credit line to governments regardless of their policies, AID effectively discourages governments from learning from and correcting their mistakes. Giving some Third World governments perpetual assistance is about as humanitarian as giving an alcoholic the key to a brewery. Good intentions are no excuse for helping to underwrite an individual’s—or a country’s— self-destruction.

    Foreign aid programs appear to be incorrigible. For 35 years, American foreign aid policymakers seem to have learned nothing and forgotten nothing. U.S. foreign aid projects routinely repeat the same mistakes today that were committed decades ago. One telltale ironic report title from the General Accounting Office says it all: “Experience—A Potential Tool for Improving U.S. Assistance Abroad.”[6]

    ———————————————————————–

    Experience: A Potential Tool for Improving US Assistance Abroad

    www.gao.gov/products/ID-82-36
    Government Accountability Office

    GAO examined how the Agency for International Development (AID) identifies, records, and uses the knowledge and experience gained from development …

    ————————————————————————

    This study focuses on the failure of U.S. humanitarian aid to achieve its goals. It begins with a close examination of one of the most popular foreign aid programs, Food for Peace. Then comes a review of AID’s record in resurrecting the economies of Central America, followed by an analysis of AID’s role in African agricultural development. AID’s achievements in Egypt and Indonesia are then reviewed, followed by an analysis of AID’s role in spurring the development of private business and capitalism in poor countries. The study concludes with an analysis of why U.S. foreign aid has failed in the past and why it will most likely fail in the future. Military aid and security assistance is a different issue and is not examined here.

    Read the Full Policy Analysis PDF (66.68 KB)

    ——————————————————————

    Why U.S. Foreign Aid Fails – National Center for Policy Analysis

    www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/?Article_ID=23228

    National Center for Policy Analysis

    May 31, 2013 – State-provided foreign aid creates the incentive for already … For upwards of 50 years the U.S. federal government has been sending developmental aid to other countries … Browse more articles on Tax and Spending Issues …

    Why U.S. Foreign Aid Fails

    May 31, 2013

    For upwards of 50 years the U.S. federal government has been sending developmental aid to other countries trying to create vibrant economies. Yet, there have been no recorded monumental successes with the use of developmental aid. Based on the high standard of living enjoyed in the United States, you might think that the U.S. government would know how to replicate that standard of living, but they don’t, says Christopher Coyne, F. A. Harper professor of economics at the Mercatus Center.

    In the minds of many first world leaders, development of impoverished nations does not come from going through the same long process first world countries did. Instead, it contains a top-down approach that promises great things like ending poverty. However, there are multiple reasons why state-provided aid cannot bring nations out of poverty:

    • Policymakers do not have access to the knowledge needed to allocate scarce resources to their best uses. In his critique of socialism in the 1930s and 1940s, Nobel Laureate Friedrich Hayek made this exact point, noting that even the most qualified and benevolent planners lack the knowledge to produce even the most basic items in a cost-effective manner.
    • Aid creates the incentive for already dysfunctional governments to remain ineffective. A cross-country study by Stephen Knack of the World Bank found that foreign aid undermines the quality of political institutions in recipient countries through weakened accountability of political actors, more corruption, greater chances of conflict, and a weakening of the incentive to reform inefficient institutions and policies.
    • Government agencies tend to focus on spending money as quickly as possible on observable outputs to signal their importance and the need for more money. In the absence of clear lines of accountability, money is often wasted.

    The current operations of aid to foreign countries fail because there is not enough supervision as to where the funds go, or how the funds are spent specifically. The real solution to these problems is the guarantee of person liberty and property for citizens in those impoverished nation. Human nature will do the rest.

    Source: Christopher Coyne, “Why Government Aid Programs Aren’t the Best Way to End Poverty,” Mercatus Center, May 21, 2013.

    – See more at: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/?Article_ID=23228#sthash.B7ixm8qU.dpuf

    ——————————————————————-

    Why U.S. Foreign Aid Fails  May 31, 2013

    Government Accountability Office 1982

    ID-82-36: Published: Jun 15, 1982. Publicly Released: Jun 15, 1982.

    Experience: A Potential Tool for Improving US Assistance Abroad

    www.gao.gov/products/ID-82-36

    ———————————————————-

    American foreign aid still suffers the same problems it did when Kennedy took office in 1961. Despite countless reforms, foreign aid is still a failure.

    ——————————————————-

    INDEED U.S. FOREIGN AID HAS FAILED IN SYRIA AUG 26, 2016

    AFTER MORE THAN $5.1 BILLION IN U.S. TAXPAYERS DOLLARS FOR WASHINGTON DC’S CONTINUING DIPLOMATIC POLICY FOR HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO SYRIA, OVER A BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, SINCE THE START OF THE FIVE-YEAR CIVIL WAR.

    The American people are witness to, and paying for the Continuing Failure of WASHINGTON DC’S Foreign Aid policy 1946-2016.

    ————————————————————–

    In 1982, the GAO examined how the Agency for International Development (AID) identifies, records, and uses the knowledge and experience gained from development …

    So, I CALLED THE Government Accountability Office 1(202)512-4800.

    Georgette directed my call to 1-(202)512-5941  a GAO research team? and I left them a message.

    AS TRUMP SAID,  ESTABLISHMENT POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN MAKING VERY BAD DEAL FOR AMERICA, FOR 70 YEARS.

    VOTE FOR DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 2016

    WHY?

    Because, You can always count on Americans to do the right thing – after they’ve tried everything else. Winston Churchill


  • The Elephant’s Graveyard

    The Elephant’s Graveyard

    THE REPUBLICANS  ELEPHANT SYMBOL originated during the 1860 campaign

     I AM DISGUSTED WITH THE REPUBLICANS OLD GOP RIGGED ESTABLISHMENT’S ELECTION PROCESS
    —————————

    I watched the 2016 Presidential primary election unfold, 17 candidates down to the election of Trump as the GOP Presidential candidate, on July 19, 2016, BY THE POPULIST VOTE….  IN SPITE OF THE GOP ESTABLISHMENT’S RIGGED ELECTION PROCESS

    AS A TRUMP SUPPORTER, I AM DISGUSTED,

    I asked Google a sarcastic question.

    WHERE DO OLD ELEPHANTS GO TO DIE?

    THE ELEPHANTS GRAVEYARD

    IT IS THOUGHT TO BE THE RETREAT OF OLD AND DYING ELEPHANTS, OLDER ELEPHANTS INSTINCTIVELY DIRECT THEMSELVES WHEN THEY REACH A CERTAIN AGE SO THAT THEY DIE AWAY FROM THE HERD,

    NOT HINDERING THE PROGRESS OF THOSE THAT REMAIN “IN FRONT”.

    ——————————————————————————

    I watched as promises were broken by the GOP Republican establishment POLITICIANS as they failed to endorse the elected people’s choice candidate. Including a friend that persisted with negative email comments.

    I sent him the above, and suggested that he go to the  Elephants Graveyard and stop hindering the progress of those that remain behind, with his negative email comments.

    ——————————————————————————-

    AND, I WATCHED  AND I LISTENED TO THE LATEST GOP ESTABLISHMENT’S FIFTY PROMINENT REPUBLICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERTS PUBLIC MEDIA OPPOSITION TO TRUMP…INCLUDING KASICH .

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH I HAVE POSTED THIS MESSAGE TO “ALL OF THOSE TRUMP NAY SAYERS” ON MY WEBSITE

    YOU HAVE  REACHED A CERTAIN AGE, PLEASE INSTINCTIVELY DIRECT YOURSELVES TO GO TO THE ELEPHANTS GRAVEYARD, DIE AWAY FROM THE GOP HERD AND STOP HINDERING THE PROGRESS OF THE GOP REPUBLICAN THAT REMAINS IN FRONT.(by populace vote)

    ————————————————————————-

    Elephant Graveyard – Elephants Forever

    TRUMP SUPPORTERS HAVE “HAD IT”  WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT’S  DIE HARD GOP’S PUBLIC MEDIA FRENZY, SELF INFLICTED  SUICIDAL MISSION, TO THEMSELVES AS GOP POLITICIANS AND TO THE  LOSS OF THE  GOP REPUBLICAN PARTY IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

    ——————————————————————————-

    POLITICALLY CORRECT OR NOT

    WINNERS ARE NOT LOSERS

    PATTON SAID, LEAD ME, FOLLOW OR GET THE HELL OUT OF MY WAY!

    His vigor was always infectious, his wit barbed, his conversation a mixture of obscenity and good humor. He was at once stimulating and overbearing. George was a magnificent soldier.

    He was tough. War is tough. Leaders have to be tough.

    If you’re a leader, you don’t push wet spaghetti, you pull it.

    General George S. Patton – Speech to 3rd Army June 5, 1944

    www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1162650/posts

    Free Republic

    Jun 29, 2004 – After one of my lectures on the subject of General Patton, I spoke with a retired … An army without profanity couldn’t fight it’s way out of a piss-soaked paper bag. … She said that she had no use for it and that I could have it. ….. GMT-0700 (PDT) by JohnD9207 (Leadfollow…or get the HELL out of the way!).

    TRUMP IS A WINNER THAT  WILL MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN.

    ——————————————————–

    You know me…

    research, document, document, document… HISTORY is good.

    AN IMAGE OF AN ELEPHANT WAS FEATURED AS A REPUBLICAN SYMBOL IN AT LEAST ONE POLITICAL CARTOON AND A NEWSPAPER ILLUSTRATION DURING THE CIVIL WAR

    WHEN “SEEING THE ELEPHANT” WAS AN EXPRESSION USED BY SOLDIERS TO MEAN EXPERIENCING COMBAT.

    ———————————————————–

    Many VETERANS of George W. Bush’s administration, Fifty (50) GOP prominent Republican foreign policy and national security experts, oppose Donald Trump.

    ———————————————————————————-

    POLITICAL CARTOONS? MANY A REAL TRUTH IS SPOKEN IN JEST.

    Old silly me, I thought the republican symbol of the elephant was  created by the genius of the GOP.

    THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WAS FORMED IN 1854

    TWENTY YEARS LATER 1874  THE ELEPHANT WAS STILL A GOP POLITICAL CARTOON

    IN AN 1874 HARPER’S WEEKLY CARTOON. an elephant labeled “THE REPUBLICAN VOTE,” which was shown standing at the edge of a pit, Thomas Nast who’s considered the father of the modern political cartoon employed the elephant to represent Republicans in additional cartoons during the 1870s, and by 1880 other cartoonists were using the creature to symbolize the party. 

    An 1879 cartoon (pictured) showed a politician grabbing a donkey LABELED “DEMOCRATIC PARTY” by the tail to keep it from falling into a pit of “financial chaos.”

    And in fact THE UNCLE SAM AMERICAN’S KNOW, STARTED AS A POLITICAL CARTOON BY Thomas Nast

    ——————————————————

    Jul 27, 2016 – The Republican Party is one of the two major contemporary political parties … Donald Trump became the Republican presidential nominee on July 19, 2016. … the GOP’s ELEPHANT SYMBOL originated during the 1860 campaign

    ——————————————————————-

    Election 101:How did the Republican and Democratic parties get their …

    www.history.com/…/how-did-the-republican-and-democratic-parties-get-their-…

    History

    Jul 7, 2015 –   THE REPUBLICAN PARTY’S ELEPHANT and THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S DONKEY have been on the political scene since the 19th century. The origins of the DEMOCRATIC DONKEY can be traced to the 1828 presidential campaign of Andrew Jackson. DURING THAT RACE, OPPONENTS OF JACKSON CALLED HIM A JACKASS.

    ————————————————————————————

    WHICH LED ME TO

    Of Donkeys and Elephants – Classroom Law Project

    WHAT ARE OUR AMERICAN KIDS BEING TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOL?

    THIS IS A MAJOR CONCERN TO ALL PARENTS AND GRANDPARENTS.

    with a header SELECTING THE NEXT PRESIDENT?

    NOT ELECTING THE NEXT PRESIDENT

    Why Nast chose the donkey and the elephant is a pretty complicated story.

    Although Nast’s original interpretation used the donkey to stand in for a Democrat-leaning newspaper scaring away Republican voters,

    his cartoon showing a duplicitous donkey attacking a weak-minded elephant,

    became a handy symbol for other cartoonists wanting to represent Democrats attacking Republicans.

    Popular recognition of the image overrode the party’s own wishes

    Over time, Republicans came to view the elephant emblem as a sign of strength and intelligence, while their opponents portrayed it as a timid and clumsy behemoth. Democrats seized the “jackass” label, and transformed it into a clever and courageous donkey.

    AS IS STILL TRUE TODAY, IT’S ALL IN THE SPIN!

    ——————————————————————————————

    50 GOP national security experts oppose Trump – CNNPolitics.com

    www.cnn.com/…/republicannationalsecurity-letter-donald-trump-election-2016…

    CNN 3 days ago – 50 GOP national security experts oppose Donald Trump 02:40. … Washington (CNN)FIFTY PROMINENT REPUBLICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERTSMANY VETERANS OF GEORGE W. BUSH’S ADMINISTRATION — have signed a letter denouncing Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy and …

    Elephant Graveyard – Elephants Forever

    www.elephantsforever.co.za/elephant-graveyard.html

    Elephant Graveyard. The existence of a mass graveyard to which elephants go to die remains a myth. IT IS THOUGHT TO BE THE RETREAT OF OLD AND DYING ELEPHANTS, SO THAT THEY DIE AWAY FROM THE HERD, NOT HINDERING THE PROGRESS OF THOSE THAT REMAIN BEHIND.

    An elephants’ graveyard is a place where, according to legend, OLDER ELEPHANTS INSTINCTIVELY DIRECT THEMSELVES WHEN THEY REACH A CERTAIN AGE. THEY THEN DIE THERE ALONE, FAR FROM THE GROUP.

    AWAY FROM THE HERD, NOT HINDERING THE PROGRESS OF THOSE THAT REMAIN BEHIND.

    ———————————————————————-

    Is  Google answer, a coincidence of political symbolic importance, a myth  a legend or an oxymoron? All of the above?

    Whatever  Elephant Graveyard – Elephants Forever is, for the purpose of this comment, I’m going with a type of  analogy, A simile – A comparison between two things that are not alike and replaces the word with another word AND uses the word “like” or “as.”

    LIKE AN ELEPHANT,  AS AN REPUBLICAN

    AS A REPUBLICAN, LIKE AN ELEPHANT

    —————————————————————————–

    Hmmm…. perhaps I should add?

    Metaphor, figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.

    And,  mixed metaphor,a combination of two or more incompatible metaphors, which produces a ridiculous effect

    With documented  facts about the Republican (GOP) thrown in

    What ever this comment is….

    ———————————————-

     The bottom line is….

    A MESSAGE  TO “ALL GOP TRUMP NAY SAYERS”

    YOU HAVE  REACHED A CERTAIN AGE, PLEASE INSTINCTIVELY DIRECT YOURSELVES TO GO TO THE ELEPHANTS GRAVEYARD, DIE AWAY FROM THE GOP HERD AND STOP HINDERING THE PROGRESS OF THOSE REPUBLICANS THAT REMAIN IN FRONT. (by populace vote)


  • Trump Will Make America Safe Again

    Trump Americanization Not  Globalization

    Trump America first

    Trump make America strong  again

    Trump  a  land of Law and Order

    Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen.

    American voters will make it happen

    In 2017 President Donald J. Trump will make it happen

    Trumps  land of Law and Order.. in this order

    Trump make America safe again

    Trump make America strong  again

    Trump American citizens first

    Trump American jobs first

    Idle hands are the devil’s workshop

    The battle cry of the Republic 2015-2016

    Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump

    There are three kinds of people in this world: people who make it happen, people who watch what happens, and people who wonder what happened.

     Idle lips are the devils mouthpiece.

    WHO MADE THIS HAPPEN?

    Run, Hide, Fight Video – FBI

    https://www.fbi.gov/about…/runhidefight-video

    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

    secure the door. • Attempt … RUN. • Have an escape route and plan in mind. • Leave your belongings behind. • Keep your hands visible. 2. HIDE. • Hide in an area out of the shooter’s view. • Block entry to your hiding place and lock the doors … FIGHT. • As a last resort and only when your life is in imminent danger. • Attempt …

    WHO WATCHED  AND WONDERED WHEN THIS HAPPEN IN ORLANDO AND PARIS?

    IS ANYBODY ASKING, HOW THIS RUNNING, HIDING, BLOCKING AND LOCKING OUT… 

    WORKED  OUT TO COMBAT GLOBAL RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST ATTACKS IN GUN FREE ZONES?

    WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

     ———————————————————————————-

    LEARNING FROM A HISTORIC WINNER!

    WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS A FIGHTER AND WINNER

    NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER!

    WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

    TRUMP IS A FIGHTER AND A WINNER

    TRUMP WILL NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER

    One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. NEVER RUN AWAY FROM ANYTHING. NEVER!

    WINSTON CHURCHILL

     ——————————————————————————

     WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT IN TIME, DOES IT MAKE?

     HILLARY CLINTON IS THE 2016 DEMOCRATS PROGRESSIVE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

     WHO ARE OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATED LOSERS?

    WHO TURNED THEIR BACK ON BENGHAZI?

    WHO LIED THROUGH THEIR TEETH?

    WHO IS THE BIGGEST LIAR OF THEM ALL?

     HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY


    WHO TURNED THEIR BACKS ON AMERICANS?

    WHO RAN AWAY FROM RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS?

    WHO DOUBLED THE DANGER OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM?

    WHO RAN AWAY FROM EVERYTHING  MUSLIM JIHAD AND THE  ISLAMIC CELIPHATE

    WHO ARE OBAMA’S COWARDLY FLINCHERS?

    —————————————–

    JULY 23 2016

    WikiLeaks Release Over 19,000 Leaked Emails From The Democratic …

    www.breitbart.com/…/wikileaks-release-19000-leaked-emails-democrat…

    Breitbart News

    JUNE 21, 2016

    1 day ago – WikiLeaks have released 19252 leaked emails from the US Democratic National Committee today, IN THE LATEST OF THEIR DNC/CLINTON LEAKS. … Visitors to the site can navigate the nearly 20,000 emails and attachments by … a search bar that allows users to input keywords that may appear in the documents.

    JUNE 23, 2016

    VIDEO: Protester shouting ‘DNC leak!’ ejected from Hillary rally

    The American Mirror‎ – 2 hours ago

    ————————————————————–

    TEN YEARS OF WIKILEAKS 2006-2016

    Wikileaks is a self-described “not-for-profit media organization,” launched in 2006 for the purposes of disseminating original documents from anonymous sources and leakers.

    Julian Assange: Why the world needs WikiLeaks | TED Talk | TED.com

    —————————————————————–

    WikiLeaks 2010: A Glimpse of the Future? – Belfer Center for Science …

    Aug 10, 2011 – although WikiLeaks has been registered since 2006: There is one massive leak by a ….. October 22: Iraq War Logs, 391,832 documents released at once … As of January 11, 2011, 2,017 cables have been released with many…….

    ————————————————————-
    “Long before WikiLeaks was born, THE INTERNET HAD TRANSFORMED THE LANDSCAPE of journalism, creating a wide-open and global market with easier access to audiences and sources, a quicker metabolism, a new infrastructure for sharing and vetting information

    The Communist East German government, for example,

    QUICKLY REALIZED THAT  IT COULD NOT STOP ITS PEOPLE FROM WATCHING

    West German TELEVISION VIA SATELLITE.

    THE INTERNET EXPANDED THIS RANGE EVEN FURTHER FROM REGIONAL TO GLOBAL

    UNLESS A GOVERNMENT TAKES PROACTIVE STEPS TO LIMIT ACCESS AND CENSOR MATERIAL

    such as the People’s Republic of China’s Great Firewall.

    In the words of Philip J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman,

    “THE MARRIAGE OF THE DATA, THE TECHNOLOGY AND THE MEDIA YIELDS IMPACT THAT IS GLOBAL, NOT LOCAL.”

    MOREOVER, THE INTERNET HAS TRANSFORMED THE AUDIENCE FROM BEING MERELY A RECIPIENT TO A POTENTIAL PARTICIPANT IN THE ROLE OF A “CITIZEN JOURNALIST” E.G. BLOGGER

    ————————————————————————–

    INDEED, THE INTERNET HAS TRANSFORMED THE AUDIENCE FROM BEING

    MERELY A RECIPIENT, WHO WATCHED WHAT WAS  HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GLOBALLY, AND, WONDERING WHAT THE HELL WAS HAPPENING TO THE WORLD.

     TO THE TRANSFORMERS, THE POWER OF CYBERSPACE TRANSFORMED BY “CITIZEN JOURNALIST” E.G. BLOGGERS, SOCIAL MEDIA, FACEBOOK, TWITTER AND TWEETS, BECAME THE DOCUMENTED MEDIA REALITY SHOWING EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE USA AND GLOBALLY, AND, CONTINUES TO DOCUMENT

    EXACTLY WHO WAS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THE WORLD.

     HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY, HILLARY…

    ——————————————————————–

    The bottom line….

     IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF TIME AND TECHNOLOGY

    BEFORE LYING’  HILLARY’S PRIVATE EMAIL  EUPHORIA

    BECAME THE GENERAL PUBLIC’S EUPHORIA

    AND ROCKED CROOKED HILLARY’S CRADLE OF POWER