+menu-


  • Category Archives Address of President Bush
  • President Bush’s New World Order 1990

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S 911 VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT HE SHARED…….

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE:

    A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR

    A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

    ——————————————————————————————

    Sept 13, 2016 THANK GOD, DONALD J. TRUMP  HAS A DIFFERENT VISION FOR AMERICA, AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES  DONALD J. TRUMP SHALL MAKE “AMERICA FIRST”

    ——————————————————————————

    PROMPTED BY THE IRAQI INVASION OF KUWAIT.PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH SAID,

    “IT WAS THEN THAT “I”  DECIDED TO ACT TO CHECK THAT AGGRESSION.”

    —————————————————

    WHO IN THE WORLD SHALL BE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST, THE MASS KILLING, MASS MIGRATION, MASS IMMIGRATION, AND THE IRREPARABLE MASS DESTRUCTION CAUSED BY OVER 15 YEARS OF CONFLICTS AND WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    I THINK NOT!

    YOU READ THIS YOU DECIDE

    ——————————————————————

    One constant for the UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL since 1980 is that it has been at grips with conflicts involving Iraq – conflicts with Iraq’s neighbours and also internal strife prior to and particularly since 2003. Every instrument at the Council’s disposal, including all the coercive ones, have been invoked at one time or another against authorities in Iraq or to assist them.

    ALL OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS TO A DEGREE PROVIDED GRIST FOR

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    ————————————————————————————

    TRUTH  AND CONSEQUENCES

    (1)  THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL IRAQ SANCTIONS

    (2)  DESTABILIZED THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST?

    (3) PROVOKING THE 911 2001 ATTACK ON NEW YORK CITY?

    (4)   VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS?

    This Address was given on 911, 1990 exactly 11 years before the 911 attack on the Twin Towers in New York City.

    ———————————————————————————-

    President George H. W. Bush’s  New World Order Address

    full text? click on the link

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    Washington’s stance did little to induce Saddam Hussein to  cooperate with UNSCOM.

    Even prior to this, the sanctions proved critically ill-suited over time to induce compliance with the UN’s wider demands articulated in Resolution 687, as the Saddam Hussein

    regime itself suffered little from the effect of sanctions. Worse still, the sanctions created the potential for a lucrative black market largely controlled by and benefiting those in power in Baghdad

    while the Iraqi population suffered ‘near-apocalyptic’ humanitarian consequences.  After the programme began, an estimated 50,000 Iraqi children under the age of five died as a result of the sanctions and child mortality rates more than doubled. Some even compared the sanctions regime itself to a weapon of mass destruction.

    Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the “most widely accepted ethical frameworks” in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that “primary responsibility rests with the UNSC [United Nations Security Council]” under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral Kantianism, and consequentialism.

    —————————————————————————–

    KANTIANISM IS DEFINED AS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY THAT FOLLOWS THE WORKS OF IMMANUEL KANT WHO BELIEVED THAT RATIONAL BEINGS HAVE DIGNITY AND SHOULD BE RESPECTED.

    A PHILOSOPHY OF RATIONAL MORALITY INCLUDING GOD AND FREEDOM

    CONSEQUENTIALISM IS THE CLASS OF NORMATIVE ETHICAL THEORIES HOLDING THAT THE CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S CONDUCT ARE THE ULTIMATE BASIS FOR ANY JUDGMENT ABOUT THE RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS OF THAT CONDUCT. IT IS THE DOCTRINE

    THAT THE MORALITY OF AN ACTION IS TO BE JUDGED SOLELY BY ITS CONSEQUENCES.

     —————————————————————————

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENCES, CULPABILITY AND CONSEQUENTIALISM

    (1)  THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL

    (2) IRAQ SANCTIONS DESTABILIZED THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST?

    (3) PROVOKED THE 911 2001 ATTACK ON NEW YORK CITY?

    (4)   VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS?

    Scholar Ramon Das, in the Human Rights Research Journal of the New Zealand Center for Public Law, examined each of the “most widely accepted ethical frameworks” in the context of violations of Iraqi human rights under the sanctions, finding that,

     INDEED….

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    under these frameworks, including rights-utilitarianism, moral KANTIANISM, and CONSEQUENTIALISM.

    ————————————————————————————

    WE CAN NOW POINT TO  THE TRUTH AND CONSEQUENCES OF   PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH’S  “NEW WORLD ORDER” ADDRESS,

    THE CRISIS IN THE PERSIAN GULF, THE RESPONSIBILITY AND CULPABILITY OF PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH.

    CONSEQUENTIALISM?  You decide

    THE CONSEQUENCES OF ONE’S CONDUCT ARE THE ULTIMATE BASIS FOR ANY JUDGMENT ABOUT THE RIGHTNESS OR WRONGNESS OF THAT CONDUCT. IT IS THE DOCTRINE THAT THE MORALITY OF AN ACTION IS TO BE JUDGED SOLELY BY ITS CONSEQUENCES.

    —————————————————————————————-

    TRUTH  AND CONSEQUENCES? INCLUDING GOD AND FREEDOM

    The United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 imposed comprehensive sanctions on Iraq following that country’s invasion of Kuwait.

    Resolutions 661 and 687 expressed the goals of eliminating weapons of mass destruction and extended-range ballistic missiles, prohibiting any support for terrorism, and forcing Iraq to pay war reparations and all foreign debt.

    ——————————————————————–

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENCES, CULPABILITY AND CONSEQUENTIALISM 

    The UN Security Council and Iraq – UNU Collections – United Nations …

    https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:5/wp01_theunscandiraq1.pdf

    by D Malone – ‎2013 –

    ———————————————————————————–

    HERE ARE THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS ANTI-AMERICAN SNIPPETS FROM

    PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH’S  NEW WORLD ORDER ADDRESS

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT HE SHARED…….

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE: A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR

    A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

    We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective……

    —————————————————————————————-

    I AM COMPELLED… Just asking….

    THE REAL CRISIS IN THE PERSIAN GULF?

    Just saying …..

    THE PERSIAN GULF AND ITS COASTAL AREAS ARE THE WORLD’S LARGEST SINGLE SOURCE OF CRUDE OIL.

    ———————————————————————————-

    fifth objective continued……

    A NEW WORLD ORDER—CAN EMERGE: A NEW ERA—FREER FROM THE THREAT OF TERROR,

    stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. AN ERA IN WHICH THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.

    A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor.

    Today that new world is struggling to be born,

     A WORLD QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE WE’VE KNOWN.

     A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak.

    THIS IS THE VISION THAT I SHARED with President Gorbachev in Helsinki.

     HE AND OTHER LEADERS FROM EUROPE, THE GULF, AND AROUND THE WORLD UNDERSTAND

    THAT HOW WE MANAGE THIS CRISIS TODAY COULD SHAPE THE FUTURE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.

    ——————————————————————-

    A NEW PARTNERSHIP OF NATIONS HAS BEGUN.

    These goals are not ours alone. THEY’VE BEEN ENDORSED BY THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL FIVE TIMES IN AS MANY WEEKS.

     Most countries share our concern for principle. AND MANY HAVE A STAKE IN THE STABILITY OF THE PERSIAN GULF.

    This is not, as Saddam Hussein would have it, the United States against Iraq. It is Iraq against the world.

    VITAL ECONOMIC INTERESTS ARE AT RISK AS WELL.

    IRAQ ITSELF CONTROLS SOME 10 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S PROVEN OIL RESERVES.

     IRAQ PLUS KUWAIT CONTROLS TWICE THAT.

     AN IRAQ PERMITTED TO SWALLOW KUWAIT WOULD HAVE THE ECONOMIC AND MILITARY POWER, AS WELL AS THE ARROGANCE, TO INTIMIDATE AND COERCE ITS NEIGHBORS—

    NEIGHBORS WHO CONTROL THE LION’S SHARE OF THE WORLD’S REMAINING OIL RESERVES.

    WE CANNOT PERMIT A RESOURCE SO VITAL TO BE DOMINATED BY ONE SO RUTHLESS

    One way or another, the leader of Iraq must learn this fundamental truth. From the outset, acting hand in hand with others, we’ve sought to fashion the broadest possible international response to Iraq’s aggression.

    THE LEVEL OF WORLD COOPERATION AND CONDEMNATION OF IRAQ IS UNPRECEDENTED.

    ARMED FORCES FROM COUNTRIES SPANNING FOUR CONTINENTS ARE THERE AT THE REQUEST OF KING FAHD OF SAUDI ARABIA TO DETER AND, IF NEED BE, TO DEFEND AGAINST ATTACK.

     MOSLEMS AND NON-MOSLEMS, ARABS AND NON-ARABS, SOLDIERS FROM MANY NATIONS STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER, RESOLUTE AGAINST SADDAM HUSSEIN’S AMBITIONS.

    WE CAN NOW POINT TO FIVE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS THAT CONDEMN IRAQ’S AGGRESSION.

    ————————————————————————————-

    The UN Security Council and Iraq – UNU Collections – United Nations …

    https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:5/wp01_theunscandiraq1.pdf

    by D Malone – ‎2013 –

    Finally, the United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission

    (UNIKOM) was established by Resolution 689 in April 1991. Once again, signaling a new a post-cold war vigour, the Council empowered UNIKOM with duties under a Chapter

    VII mandate, implying coercive powers if necessary.

    ALL OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS TO A DEGREE PROVIDED GRIST FOR

    PRESIDENT BUSH’S VISION OF A “NEW WORLD ORDER”

    OUTLINED IN A SPEECH TO A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 1990 PROMPTED BY THE IRAQI INVASION OF KUWAIT.

    WASHINGTON’S STANCE DID LITTLE TO INDUCE SADDAM HUSSEIN TO  COOPERATE WITH UNSCOM.

     Even prior to this, the sanctions proved critically ill-suited over time to induce compliance with the UN’s wider demands articulated in Resolution 687, as the Saddam Hussein

    regime itself suffered little from the effect of sanctions. Worse still, the sanctions created the potential for a lucrative black market largely controlled by and benefiting those in power in Baghdad while

    THE IRAQI POPULATION SUFFERED ‘NEAR-APOCALYPTIC’ HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES.

     AFTER THE PROGRAMME BEGAN, AN ESTIMATED 50,000 IRAQI CHILDREN UNDER

    THE AGE OF FIVE DIED AS A RESULT OF THE SANCTIONS AND CHILD MORTALITY RATES MORE THAN DOUBLED. SOME EVEN COMPARED THE SANCTIONS REGIME ITSELF TO A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION

    ————————————————————————-

    TRUTH, CONSEQUENTIALISM AND CULPABILITY OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL IRAQ SANCTIONS

    WHO IN THE WORLD SHALL BE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR DESTABILIZATION OF THE ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST, THE MASS KILLING, MASS MIGRATION, MASS IMMIGRATION, AND THE IRREPAIRABLE MASS DESTRUCTION CAUSED BY OVER 15 YEARS OF CONFLICTS AND WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

    “PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY RESTS WITH THE UNSC [UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL]”

    I THINK NOT!