+menu-


  • Category Archives A REALLY BIG SWAMP
  • DOI Update on the (SES) Swamp Dwellers

    Thanks to Liz Bowen’s “Pie N Politics” comment, I  can document and update 

    Zinke moves to drain the swamp at Interior Department

    Jun 19, 2017

    CORRUPTION, Dept. of INTERIOR

    ———————————————————————————-

    November 11, 2016  I received this cut and paste warning from a pretty reliable D.C. insider

    —– Original Message —–

    FromXXXX

    To: pearl hewett

    Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 1:16 PM

    Subject: Re: The list from D.C.

    Ok, but suggest not just focusing on the 4000….here’s the cut and paste hub-bub from DC we are being warned to keep an eye on too: 

    …7,000 Senior Executive Service positions that do NOT require Senate confirmation, but only Presidential appointment – these are the “agency career positions” that are usually filled by experienced federal officials and are hard to get rid of because of legal protections. It will be very difficult for Trump to eliminate any of these positions because they directly assist the Politicals confirmed by the Senate, who will protect their empires and agency positions.

     —————————————————————–

    November 11-14, 2016 I did more research, documented and posted this comment on behindmyback.org

    The Untouchables SES Senior Executives

    Posted on November 14, 2016 4:29 pm by Pearl Rains Hewett

    The Untouchables SES Senior Executives

    TRUMP AND HIS TRANSITIONAL TEAM ARE DRAINING PART OF THE WA DC.  SWAMP  OF 4000 ALLIGATORS…

    BUT, THAT NUMBER PALES TO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ABOUT 7000 ALLIGATORS (SES) UNTOUCHABLES,  IN  “CIVIL SERVICE”  “UNFIREABLE”

    AS CIVIL SERVICE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) EMPLOYED AND  ALREADY EMBEDDED IN “CAREER POSITIONS”  IN THE WA DC SWAMP.

    SOMETHING WENT BLATANTLY AMOK IN THE US GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVICE BETWEEN 1883-2016.

    NOW, WE HAVE  AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT WHO SHALL BE ACCOUNTABLE

    STEVE BANNON HAS BEEN APPOINTED AS TRUMP’S CHIEF STRATEGIST.

    STEVE SHALL FIND A STRATEGY TO REMOVE THE 7000 UNTOUCHABLES, “UNFIREABLE CIVIL SERVICE” (SES) SENIOR EXECUTIVES?

    —————————————————————————–

    A STRATEGY INDEED

    ————————————————————-

    Zinke moves to drain the swamp at Interior Department

    Jun 19, 2017

    CORRUPTION, Dept. of INTERIOR

    June 19, 2017 Free Range Report

    snippets….

    Although Zinke is constrained by a 120 day grace period, IT APPEARS THAT HE HAS HAD THIS PLAN ON THE READY FOR SOME TIME. Greenwire goes on:

    Dozens of Senior Executive Service employees — career officials within the federal government — received letters yesterday informing them that they may be reassigned as early as June 28, the newspaper said.

    According to the Post, the letters sent to as many 50 SES employees provided a 15-day notice of their looming job changes, as required by law. Zinke and all political appointees must wait at least 120 days following their confirmations to relocate any SES members. The Senate confirmed Zinke on March 1.

    Shifting 50 general-officer-equivalents is not a small undertaking. It represents an intention to totally demolish the existing power structure. By separating these long serving SES officials from the organizations they have run for perhaps decades….

    ——————————————————————————–

    Update February 21, 2017

    The Secret Service of Obama’s 7000 (SES)

    Posted on February 21, 2017 11:00 am by Pearl Rains Hewett

    The Secret Service of Obama’s 7000 (SES)

    Feb17, 2017 Judge Jeanine called them Obama’s “LEFTOVERS”.  And, she said what the president has to do with it is make clear that he doesn’t play around either and prosecute them.

    Feb. 15,  2017 Wikileaked, Julian Assange wrote “Amazing battle for dominance is playing out between the elected us govt & the IC who consider themselves to be the ‘PERMANENT GOVERNMENT’,”.

    I CALL THEM OBAMA’S 7000 (SES) UNTOUCHABLES.

    ————————————————————————————

    Full unedited text Liz Bowen’s “Pie N Politics” comment

    ————————————————————————————–

    Zinke moves to drain the swamp at Interior Department

    Jun 19, 2017

    CORRUPTION, Dept. of INTERIOR

    Free Range Report

    June 19, 2017

    Zinke’s departmental shake up is not just your typical, run-of-the-mill reorganization that happens each time a new administration takes power. Zinke took over a department that has been dogged by controversy, corruption, and a reputation that prompts fear and loathing in the West.

    posted by Marjorie Haun

    Trump’s Interior Department Secretary, Montana rancher and former Navy Seal Ryan Zinke, is proving to be more than just a dramatic contrast to Obama’s Interior chief, liberal Democrat recreation industry exec., Sally Jewell. Zinke’s getting to work unraveling her legacy–and that of previous progressive predecessors–in short order. Beyond the Obama monument land grabs, which are currently under review as ordered by President Trump, with significant reductions and reversals in the works, Zinke is breaking up the bureaucratic status quo in his department’s upper echelons. On June 16, Greenwire reported:

    Dozens of Senior Executive Service employees — career officials within the federal government — received letters yesterday informing them that they may be reassigned as early as June 28, the newspaper said.

    “Personnel moves are being conducted to better serve the taxpayer and the Department’s operations through matching Senior Executive skill sets with mission and operational requirements,” said Interior spokeswoman Heather Swift in an email. She noted that Zinke mentioned the “Department-wide, front lines-focused reorganization on his first day address to all employees.”

    It is not unusual for new cabinet members, who wield considerable power in reworking their respective departments, to shake things up, but Zinke is using his clout to shift manpower and influence out of Washington D.C. beltway bureaucracy into the ‘field,’ or those areas where federal policies have real-world consequences for states and localities. The Greenwire article says:

    Last week, Zinke outlined his plans for reorganizing the agency under a “joint system” that would shift federal employees from Washington to the field.

    Although Zinke is constrained by a 120 day grace period, it appears that he has had this plan on the ready for some time. Greenwire goes on:

    According to the Post, the letters sent to as many 50 SES employees provided a 15-day notice of their looming job changes, as required by law. Zinke and all political appointees must wait at least 120 days following their confirmations to relocate any SES members. The Senate confirmed Zinke on March 1.

    The newspaper reported that Interior Office of Policy Analysis Director Joel Clement, the top climate policy official, was among those to receive the notice and that he will be transferred to the Office of Natural Resources Revenue.

    In addition, the Post said, several Fish and Wildlife Service officials received the notices, including Assistant Director for International Affairs Bryan Arroyo, Southwest Regional Director Benjamin Tuggle, Southeast Regional Director Cindy Dohner and Office of Law Enforcement Chief Bill Woody, who will move to the Bureau of Land Management.

    Tuggle and Dohner have both been involved in high-profile fights over how to recover gray wolf subspecies in their regions. Arroyo, who has been leading Fish and Wildlife’s fight against wildlife trafficking, last year was found by Interior’s inspector general to have potentially violated federal regulations by pressuring his staff into awarding a noncompetitive contract worth more than $256,000.

    Zinke’s departmental shake up is not just your typical, run-of-the-mill reorganization that happens each time a new administration takes power. Zinke took over a department that has been dogged by controversy, corruption, and a reputation that prompts fear and loathing in the West. The Interior Department and its biggest agencies; the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the federal Fish and Wildlife Service, have overstepped and over-regulated for decades. Beyond a mere managerial overhaul, this move may signal Zinke’s philosophical re-calibration of Interior and its branches. Streiff, a reporter at  RedState, wrote about the changes this way:

    Shifting 50 general-officer-equivalents is not a small undertaking. It represents an intention to totally demolish the existing power structure. By separating these long serving SES officials from the organizations they have run for perhaps decades means that there will be a lot less resistance to reorganization. Many of these people will resign rather than accept the reassignment. That is a feature, not a bug. By making this move before he has his own appointees in place, Zinke is signaling to the agency and to Senate Democrats that he will not be deterred by intransigence.

    The RedState article acknowledges the little-discussed bog at the Bureau of Indian Affairs; one of the most inefficient and wasteful agencies of them all, which has escaped broader scrutiny only because it’s considered politically incorrect to discuss anything related to Native American policies in a negative light. RedState’s Streiff goes on:

    The transfers that struck me were the Bureau of Indian Affairs positions. If there is a more corrupt, inept, and apathetic federal agency than BIA I really wish someone would point it out to me. BIA has resisted change of all types for decades, failing to serve either the Indians or the nation but doing quite well for themselves. Taking two of the top people out of there certainly clears the decks for action.

    Zinke will, of course, still have to deal with these people after they are transferred but they will have been stripped of power and hubris and might be more willing to cooperate.

    If there were to exist a top-ten list of federal agents, bureaucrats, or appointees guilty of hubris and unchecked abuse of power, at least half of them would probably come out of the Department of Interior, which for decades has grown more oppressive and less accountable in its tasks of managing vast amounts of American land and resources.

    Although we don’t have  specific information on who will be sacked as a result of Zinke’s reorganization, we hope that the worst of the bad players will be held to account. The first power-mad fiend that should go is Dan Love, the BLM special agent who has wreaked havoc and left a trail of destruction everywhere he’s worked in the West. And there are many others who should be jettisoned out of the government and back into civilian life.

    We’ve reported here at Free Range Report about those agents and bureaucrats with environmentalist entanglements and extremist ideologies that are incompatible with the proper role of the Interior Department; which is to facilitate game management, livestock production, and responsible resource development on public lands. President Trump’s election was based in large part on his promise to drain the federal swamp. Zinke may be initiating that process at the Department of Interior, and the sooner the better, because that is an unbelievably fetid, murky swamp to be drained.

    Contact Secretary Zinke at the Interior Department and encourage him to drain the swamp with haste, starting with Dan Love.

    The bottom line…

    Thanks to Liz Bowen’s “Pie N Politics” comment, I  can document and I did update .

     


  • POTUS WOTUS EPA ACE and Justice Scalia

    POTUS WOTUS EPA ACE  and Justice Scalia

    President Trump signed an executive order on February 28, 2017, to roll back the waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ACE (Corps) promulgated in 2016.

    The Order is entitled, “Presidential Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.”

    It instructs EPA and the ACE Corps to begin the process of a rule-making to withdraw the WOTUS rule, id. at § 2(a), and to take appropriate actions in the courts where the rule is in litigation. Id. § 2(c).

    President Trump signed executive order on February 28, 2017 instructs EPA and the Corps to

    “CONSIDER” ADOPTING THE SCALIA TEST FROM RAPANOS V. UNITED STATES, 547 U.S. 715 (2006).

    ORDER § 3. SCALIA OPINED IN RAPANOS THAT, “THE PHRASE ‘THE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES’ includes only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water ‘forming geographic features’ that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams[,] . . . oceans, rivers, [and] lakes.’. . . . The phrase does not include channels through which water flows intermittently or ephemerally, or channels that periodically provide drainage for rainfall. . .” 547 U.S. at 739.

    ————————————————————————

    Notice that Trump signed the EO back at the end of February 2017, and the EPA is JUST NOW sending the information out. It looks like they have deliberately STALLED.

    These statements have to be in by June 19, 2017. Heads up!

    ————————————————————————————

    THE FEDERAL DEFINITION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES

    IS LOCATED AT 33 CFR 329.4

    • 329.4 General definition.

    Navigable waters of the United States are those waters that are subject to the ebb (the outgoing phase; when the tide drains away from the shore) and flow (the incoming phase; when water rises again) of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. A determination of  navigability, once made, applies laterally over the entire surface of the waterbody, and is not extinguished by later actions or events which impede or destroy navigable capacity.

    ——————————————————————————————-

    The federal definition 40 CFR 230 .3 pertains to the Clean Water Act and waters of the United States.

    WOTUS BY OBAMA

    The definition of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) is very dangerous and overreaching. Under section (o), parts of the definition read as follows:
    o) The term waters of the United States means: …

    (ii) All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;

    (iv) All impoundments of waters otherwise identified as waters of the United States under this section;

    (vi) All waters adjacent to a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, including  wetlands, ponds, lakes, oxbows, impoundments, and similar waters;

    (vii) All waters in paragraphs (o)(1)(vii)(A) through (E) of this section where they are determined, on a case-specific basis, to have a  significant nexus to a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section. The waters identified in each of paragraphs (o)(1)(vii)(A) through (E) of this section are similarly situated and shall be combined, for purposes of a significant nexus analysis, in the watershed that drains to the nearest water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section. Waters identified in this paragraph shall not be combined with waters identified in paragraph (o)(1)(vi) of this section when performing a significant nexus analysis. If waters identified in this paragraph are also an  adjacent water under paragraph (o)(1)(vi), they are an adjacent water and no case-specific significant nexus analysis is required.

    (A)Prairie potholes. Prairie potholes are a complex of glacially formed wetlands, usually occurring in depressions that lack permanent natural outlets, located in the upper Midwest.

    (viii) All waters located within the 100-year floodplain of a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section and all waters located within 4,000 feet of the high tideline or ordinary high water mark of a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (v) of this section where they are determined on a case-specific basis to have a significant nexus to a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section. For waters determined to have a  significant nexus, the entire water is a water of the United States if a portion is located within the 100-year floodplain of a water identified in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section or within 4,000 feet of the high tide line or ordinary high water mark. Waters identified in this paragraph shall not be combined with waters identified in paragraph (o)(1)(vi) of this section when performing a significant nexus analysis. If waters identified in this paragraph are also an adjacent water under paragraph (o)(1)(vi), they are an adjacent water and no case-specific  significant nexus analysis is required.

    —————————————————————————————

    WRITING FOR THE COURT IN THE 2014 CLEAN AIR ACT CASE, UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP V. EPA, JUSTICE SCALIA DECLARED EPA’S INTERPRETATION UNREASONABLE BECAUSE IT WOULD BRING ABOUT AN ENORMOUS AND TRANSFORMATIVE EXPANSION IN EPA’S REGULATORY AUTHORITY WITHOUT CLEAR CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION.

    JUSTICE SCALIA DECLARED “We expect Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast ‘economic and political significance,’” he wrote.
    —————————————————————————————

    OBAMA VETOES GOP ATTEMPT TO BLOCK WOTUS WATER RULE

    By Timothy Cama – 01/19/16 07:22 PM EST

    ———————————————————-

    EPA ‘Waters of U.S.’ Rule Is a Power Grab | National Review

    www.nationalreview.com/article/431134/epa-waters-us-rule-power-grab

    by Rupert Darwall February 11, 2016 4:00 AM. Obama’s power-mad agency claims jurisdiction over land and water use almost everywhere in … EPA, under the Clean Water Act, a statute Congress passed two years after its clean-air sibling. … partially checked, in what has become known as the Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS).

    ————————————————————————————————-

    President Trump signed an executive order on February 28, 2017, to roll back the waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) promulgated in 2016. The Order is entitled, “Presidential Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.” It instructs EPA and the Corps to begin the process of a rule-making to withdraw the WOTUS rule, id. at § 2(a), and to take appropriate actions in the courts where the rule is in litigation. Id. § 2(c).

    The Order raises a number of interesting issues. First, it instructs EPA and the Corps to “consider” adopting the Scalia test from Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). Order § 3. Scalia opined in Rapanos that, “the phrase ‘the waters of the United States’ includes only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water ‘forming geographic features’ that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams[,] . . . oceans, rivers, [and] lakes.’. . . . The phrase does not include channels through which water flows intermittently or ephemerally, or channels that periodically provide drainage for rainfall. . .” 547 U.S. at 739.

    Because Rapanos was a split decision (4–1–4), there is no controlling opinion. The circuit courts, applying the Marks analysis, have concluded that Kennedy’s lone concurring opinion, which focused on the significant-nexus test, is the controlling standard from the case. (A couple of circuits have allowed Kennedy’s or Scalia’s opinion to be used to establish jurisdiction.) All of the circuit courts and almost all of the district courts have rejected the argument that Scalia’s test should be adopted as the sole jurisdictional test. The Supreme Court has denied certiorari numerous times since Rapanos on WOTUS issues, so we have no clarification from the Court on how to interpret the decision.

    IT IS CLEAR WHY THE ADMINISTRATION HAS CHOSEN SCALIA’S TEST—IT IS MORE RESTRICTIVE OF JURISDICTION.

     THAN THE KENNEDY TEST, WHICH EPA AND THE CORPS ADOPTED IN THE WOTUS RULE.

    UNDER THE SCALIA TEST, MOST HEADWATER SYSTEMS—ESPECIALLY IN THE ARID WEST—WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO  THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) BECAUSE MOST HEADWATER SYSTEMS ARE EPHEMERAL OR INTERMITTENT AND ARE THEREFORE NOT “RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS.” HEADWATER SYSTEMS COMPRISE A LARGE PART OF THE NATION’S TRIBUTARY SYSTEM. IN PLACES LIKE ARIZONA EVEN THE MAIN CHANNELS ARE DRY MOST OF THE YEAR AND, THEREFORE, MAY NOT MEET THE SCALIA TEST FOR JURISDICTION.

     

    THE SCALIA TEST WOULD LIKELY ALSO REMOVE MANY OF THE NATIONS’ WETLANDS FROM . EXPANSION IN EPA’S REGULATORY AUTHORITY WITHOUT CLEAR CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION.

     

    AS JUSTICE SCALIA SAID “WE EXPECT CONGRESS TO SPEAK CLEARLY IF IT WISHES TO ASSIGN TO AN AGENCY DECISIONS OF VAST ‘ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE,’”

    —————————————————————————-

    President Trump Issues Executive Order Directing EPA to Review the WOTUS Rule

    Thursday, March 2, 2017

    On February 28, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) to review the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) definition of “Waters of the United States”(WOTUS) Rule (the Rule) (80 Fed. Reg. 37054, June 29, 2015). Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the “Waters of the United States” Rule, Executive Order (Feb. 28, 2017) (EO). The EO directs EPA and ACE to review the WOTUS Rule for consistency with the policies set forth in the EO which specifies that “It is in the national interest to ensure that the Nation’s navigable waters are kept free from pollution, while at the same time promoting economic growth, minimizing regulatory uncertainty, and showing due regard for the roles of the Congress and the States under the Constitution.” The EO also directs EPA and ACE to “publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the [WOTUS] rule, as appropriate and consistent with law.”

    Pursuant to the EO, EPA and ACE submitted for publication in the Federal Register, a notification of intention to review and rescind or revise the Rule. Notice of Intention to Review and Rescind or Revise the Clean Water Rule, Environmental Protection Agency and Dept. of Defense, Feb. 28, 2017. The notification will be published in the Federal Register in the coming days.

    THE EO ALSO DIRECTS EPA AND ACE TO CONSIDER INTERPRETING THE TERM “NAVIGABLE WATERS,”IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE OPINION OF JUSTICE SCALIA IN RAPANOS V. UNITED STATES, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). The Rapanos opinion set out two separate standards for CWA jurisdiction. See Rapanos at 715‑718. Justice Scalia, writing for a plurality, determined that the statute should only apply when there is a “continuous surface connection”between “relatively permanent”waters. Id. at 743. Justice Kennedy, on the other hand, determined that jurisdiction should be based on whether a water or wetland possesses “a significant nexus to waters that are or were navigable in fact or that could reasonably be so made.” Id. at 759. Neither standard was supported by a majority, so neither standard has become binding precedent. See Id. at 715-718. Regulators, however, have generally followed Justice Kennedy’s standard,

    AND THUS, A SWITCH TO JUSTICE SCALIA’S STANDARD WOULD REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN INTERPRETATION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL EXTENT OF THE CWA. SEE 80 FED. REG. 37054, 37056, 37060-37061 [WOTUS RULE].


  • Lincoln -Trump Veteran’s Remembrance

    Lincoln -Trump Veteran’s Remembrance

    Memorial Day is a solemn day of remembrance for everyone who has died serving in the American armed forces. The holiday, originally known as Decoration Day, started May 30, 1868  after the Civil War to honor the Union and Confederate dead.

    PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S DAY OF VETERAN’S REMEMBRANCE WAS THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS NOV 19, 1863 NEARLY FIVE YEARS EARLIER

    DONALD J. TRUMP’S DAY OF VETERAN’S  REMEMBRANCE WAS JAN 28, 2016 NINE MONTHS BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT.

    Watch full Video of Donald Trump’s veterans event | FOX2now.com

    —————————————————————————

    WHEN THE GOVERNMENT  SAID,  IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING

    On Nov 8, 2016 PATRIOTIC American’s silent citizens remembered, our Veterans et al and Voted for Trump

    IT WAS GOLDEN,  WE ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP, OUR VOTE WAS LOUDER THEN OUR VOICE,

    WHEN AMERICAN CITIZENS HAD A CHOICE OF FIGHT OR FLIGHT

    THE GOVERNMENT  SAID,  IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING

    AND, THE FBI SAID,  RUN, HIDE, FIGHT AS A LAST RESORT

    FIGHTING THE OXYMORON OF U. S. GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE IS EXHAUSTING

    THE WA DC DEMOCRAT’S HAVE AND HAD ERECTED A MULTITUDE OF NEW OFFICES, AND SENT HITHER SWARMS OF OFFICERS TO HARASS WE THE PEOPLE AND EAT OUT OUR SUBSTANCE

    DEMOCRAT’S  HAVE CALLED TOGETHER LEGISLATIVE BODIES AT PLACES UNUSUAL, UNCOMFORTABLE, AND DISTANT FROM THE DEPOSITORY OF OUR PUBLIC RECORDS, FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF FATIGUING US INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR MEASURES.

    THE AMERICAN VOTERS HAD A CHOICE, WE REMEMBERED THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

    PRESIDENT TRUMP HAD CHOICES.

    HE CHOOSE TO FIGHT AS A FIRST RESORT.

    TIMELY ADVICE FROM WINSTON CHURCHILL, 

    “NEVER GIVE UP ON SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN’T GO A DAY WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT.

    NEVER GIVE IN. NEVER GIVE IN. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER—IN NOTHING, GREAT OR SMALL, LARGE OR PETTY—NEVER GIVE IN…..

    IF YOU’RE GOING THROUGH HELL, KEEP GOING.

    —————————————————-

    I AM A DEPLORABLE, I STAND WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP. 

    IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING

    SILENCE IS NOT GOLDEN WHEN IT COMES TO AMERICAN LIBERTY AND FREEDOM.

    Behind My Back | Paul and Pearl Revere

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/03/28/paul-and-pearl-revere/

    Mar 28, 2014SILENCE is NOT golden when it comes to American liberty and … read more at: http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15640#sthash.

    ————————————————-

    FIGHT WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP AS A FIRST RESORT ON MEMORIAL DAY 2017

    ABRAHAM LINCOLN, “GETTYSBURG ADDRESS” (19 NOVEMBER 1863)

    [1] Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

    [2] Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

    [3] But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate-we can not consecrate-we can not hallow-this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us-that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion-that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain-

    that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom-and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

    Behind our backs, behind closed doors

    Indeed, It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

    ————————————————————-

    THE BRAVE MEN, LIVING AND DEAD WHO STRUGGLED HERE…

    President Trump at the Lincoln Memorial

    Jan 19, 2017,  6:15 PM I just watched President Trump and his family standing and looking up at the Lincoln Memorial.

    In the exact spot I stood many years ago. The 30 year old memory was the inspiration for this website, as you all know.

    Watching the fire works, listening to the music, I am so proud to be an American deplorable, Delighted that America finally has a President that is patriotic enough to put America First.


  • Are You 100% Fed Up?

    Are You 100% Fed Up?

    I am, 100% fed up with the WA DC establishment and the lying, leaking leftovers from Obama’s eight years in office.

    I found a very inspirational website on line yesterday

    100percentfedup.com

    ———————————————————–

    THE BENGHAZI LIARS Are Back: Susan Rice And Adam Schiff Are …

    100 100percentfedup.com/the-benghazi-liars-are-back-susan-rice-and-adam-schiff-are-on…

    Apr 3, 2017 – White House lawyers last month learned that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw …

    snippet

    MOST OF US REMEMBER SUSAN RICE FOR GOING ON A MEDIA LYING BLITZ ON BEHALF OF HILLARY AND PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, where she told millions of viewers on several networks that the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous event caused by a video.

    WE ALL KNOW NOW THIS WAS A LIE AND THAT A “VIDEO” DID NOT CAUSE THE ATTACK ON OUR AMERICAN CONSULATE IN BENGHAZI.

    ———————————————————

    BODY LANGUAGE EXPERT Gives Clear Examples Of Susan Rice …

    100percentfedup.com/body-language-expert-gives-clear-examples-of-susan-rice-lyin…

    Apr 4, 2017SUSAN RICE SEEMS TO HAVE MADE A CAREER OF LYING WHILE WORKING FOR THE CORRUPT BARACK … in the video below reveals that Rice is pretty much lying through her teeth. Watch the fascinating analysis of Rice’s body language here: …

    ————————————————————————-

    Donald J. Trump secured my loyalty and  my vote on Jan 28, 2016 when Trump bowed out of the debate and held  a “Special Event to Benefit Veterans Organizations” at a packed 775-seat auditorium at nearby Drake University instead.

     You have to stick up for your rights. When you’re treated badly, you have to stick up for your rights,” Trump told the crowd. “We have to stick up for ourselves as people and we have to stick up for our country if we’re being mistreated.”
    ——————————————–

    When things got bad enough,  Donald J. Trump said “What a Mess” and he was elected  President of the United States of America.

    How bad did it get?

    I was 100% fed up  on Jan 26, 2011. When Americans citizens fear what their own government is going to do to them, it is not only unacceptable….

    Those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny….

    The brutal mentality of the Obama’s appointed administration  coercive policies, “We Crucify Them” EPA Armendariz said, “That town was really easy to manage for the next few years”

    Obama’s administrative policy was not confined to his Appointed EPA.  

    In 2014 the BLM went to the Bundy Ranch, it ended in a stand off.

    So when the BLM  went to  Oregon  “They shot him three times in the back” 

    As Armendariz said, “We make an example of them.

    Torture and Abuse of Ammon Bundy in Prison is not Going Unnoticed …

    constitution.com/torture-abuse-ammon-bundy-prison-not-going-unnoticed/

    6 days ago – Ammon Bundy, who became a national household name during the Bundy … foot shower for 13 hours, stripped naked and then thrown in the hole. … Prisoners are constantly handcuffed and Shackled, even while ..

    ——————————————————-

    Montana Disabled Veteran Convicted Over Stock Pond – Redoubt News

    https://redoubtnews.com › DOJ

    May 13, 2016 – Montana Disabled Veteran Convicted Over Stock Pond, Joseph Robertson, Kagel Environmental, Clean Water Act, Andy Johnson, EPA.

    As EPA Armendariz said, “We make an example of them”.

    “Today’s guilty verdict demonstrates that polluters will be held accountable for their actions.” said Jeffrey Martinez, Special Agent in Charge of EPA’s criminal enforcement program in MONTANA

    “This verdict sends a message that the United States will not stand by and allow streams and wetlands of the United States to be polluted, or National Forest lands to be injured,” said United States Attorney for the District of MONTANA Mike Cotter.

    Now, six months into an 18-month sentence to federal prison, in addition to tens of thousands of dollars in fines, Joe continues to suffer from declining health, confusion, and depression. He reportedly had two strokes in his first month of lock up. He was ripped from his VA medical treatment, transferred to numerous prisons over the west, thrown in solitary confinement, stripped of his veteran’s pension, unlawfully deprived of his right to be present when sensitive legal mail from his lawyer was opened, and barred from having visits from family and friends.

    May 13, 2016  who’s in charge of the EPA in MONTANA ?

    Zinki  from MONTANA  is in charge of the DOI

    “This verdict sends a message that the United States will not stand by and allow streams and wetlands of the United States to be polluted, or National Forest lands to be injured,”

    said United States Attorney for the District of MONTANA Mike Cotter.

    —————————————————

    President Trump has options, Where there’s a will there’s a way, what ever it takes….

    Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court in a final Senate vote today, replacing Justice Antonin Scalia ( by nuclear option)

    ———————————————————————-

    On March 21, 2012 with a 9-0 vote, the United State Supreme Court ruled that landowners have a right to direct, meaningful judicial review.

    “There is no reason to think that the Clean Water Act was uniquely designed to enable the strong-arming of regulated parties into ‘voluntary compliance’ without the opportunity for judicial review.”
    Justice Antonin Scalia,
    New York Times

    Click on the link  to Pacific Legal Foundation

    Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012)

    ” The Court ruled in favor of Mike and Chantell Sackett, of Priest Lake, Idaho, who were told by EPA — and by the Ninth Circuit — that they could not get direct court review……

    ————————————————–

    Were You 100% Fed Up?

    With Hillary’s Obstruction and Destruction of Justice?

    Title 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

    8.131A Obstruction of Justice—Destruction, Alteration or Falsification …

    www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/684

    Were You 100% Fed Up?

    Jul 5, 2016 When FBI Comey….

    FBI Recommends No Criminal Charges Against Hillary Clinton – NBC …

    www.nbcnews.com/…/hillary…/fbi-recommends-no-criminal-charges-against-hillary-c…

    ——————————————————–

    Where you watching the debate…

    OCT 10, 2016 when HILLARY SAID: “LUCKILY SOMEONE WITH DONALD TRUMP’S TEMPERAMENT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAW OF OUR COUNTRY”

     AND TRUMP REPLIED, “BECAUSE IF I WERE YOU’D BE IN JAIL.”

    “HILLARY TO JAIL” WAS THE SLOGAN CHANTED AT THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION IN CLEVELAND AND THE SAME SLOGAN WAS ALSO PRINTED ON CAPS AND T-SHIRTS ALL OVER THE UNITED STATES.

    MAY 15, 2017 DONALD J. TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT OF LAW AND ORDER

    LYING HILLARY ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT.

    ———————————————————–

    Perhaps it was being called stupid? Obamacare lies?

    Were You 100% Fed Up?

    3 Jonathan Gruber Videos: Americans “Too Stupid to Understand …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adrdmmh7bMo
    Nov 12, 2014 – Uploaded by Avik Roy

    In three separate appearances, MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, dubbed the … In the first, he discusses “the …

    ————————————————–

    Trump: ‘Obamacare Is Dead, It’s Gone’ – Breitbart

    www.breitbart.com/video/2017/04/29/trump-obamacare-is-dead-its-gone/

    Apr 29, 2017 – Obamacare’s dead, it’s gone. The increases were massive last year. They’re going to be bigger this year and the insurance companies are …

    ————————————————————————

    Donald J. Trump secured my loyalty and  my vote on Jan 28, 2016 when Trump bowed out of the debate and held  a “Special Event to Benefit Veterans Organizations” at a packed 775-seat auditorium at nearby Drake University instead.

     You have to stick up for your rights. When you’re treated badly, you have to stick up for your rights,” Trump told the crowd. “We have to stick up for ourselves as people and we have to stick up for our country if we’re being mistreated.”
    President Trump is sticking up for our people, our rights and our country.

    Forgotten American citizens have been abused and mistreated.

    Some still are? Joseph Robertson and Ammon Bundy.


  • FBI Comey Was Mildly Nauseous?

    Read the Rest of the Story… by Pearl Harvey

    HILLARY CLINTON ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

    No wonder Comey Was Mildly Nauseous….

    This documented comment is enough to gag a maggot

    Hilary Clinton did not swear an oath to tell the truth before meeting with the FBI for three and a half hours last weekend, and the interview was not recorded, FBI Director James Comey told House lawmakers on Thursday.

    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.

    ———————————————————
    June 3, 2014
    For decades, criminal investigators have known that the best way to obtain and preserve reliable information is to electronically record interviews and interrogations.
    And yet agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have continued to rely on handwritten notes taken during interrogations, which they later type onto so-called 302 forms.
     ——————————————
    That will finally change. In mid-May, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo instructing all federal investigative agencies—including the F.B.I., the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives—to use electronic recording while interviewing witnesses and suspects,
    EXCEPT IN CASES  INVOLVING NATIONAL SECURITY
    the new policy goes into effect on July 11th. 
    —————————————————————-
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System
    FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY,WAS PROHIBITED BY THE DOJ  TO  ELECTRONIC RECORD HIS INVESTIGATION INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE IT INVOLVED NATIONAL SECURITY.
     —————————————————————-
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ——————————————————

    May 3, 2017 – Comey said Wednesday that it makes him “mildly nauseous” to think his decision to reopen the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails just days before the election could have impacted voters, but added he would make the same choice again.

    “I faced a choice,” Comey said. “And I’ve lived my entire career by the tradition that if you can possibly avoid it, you avoid any action in the run-up to an election that might have an impact, whether it’s a dog-catcher election or president of the United States. But I sat there that morning and could not see a door labeled ‘no action here.'”

    In his most detailed explanation and strongest defense of his actions to date, Comey said it was a choice between “really bad and catastrophic” to inform lawmakers about the discovery of additional Clinton emails found on the computer of former Rep. Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

    Comey said he had the choice to either “speak” or “conceal.” He called the decision — which quickly became public — “one of the world’s most painful experiences,” but said making it was the right move.

    ————————————————————

    FBI Memo

    www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20070402_FBI_Memo.pdf
    Apr 2, 2007 – Page 1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. Frecedauon ROUTINE ‘ Date: 3/23/2006. To: All Field Offices ittm ADIC, sac, and cm:.

    ————————————-

    Bill,

    online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf

    Mar 30, 2006 – Details: FBI policy on electronic recording of confessions and witness interviews is contained in a SAC Memorandum 22—99, dated 10 August …

    ————————————————————
    Why did the F.B.I. resist the change for so many years? Bureaucratic inertia, perhaps, or discomfort with making certain techniques transparent?
    ————————————————————-
    Dated 3/17/06 Office of the General Council Investigative Law Unit
    ELECTRON RECORDING OF CONFESSIONS AND WITNESSES
    http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf
    This is a 54 page DOJ document
    with a hand written notation “SO WE WANT TO HIDE THE TRUTH? DON’T WANT JURY TO REACH IT’S OWN JUDGMENT?
    It is recognized there are many situations in which recording the subjects interview would be prudent…
    On a case-by-case opportunity to use this technique where and when it will be used to further the investigation and subsequent prosecution….
    ————————————————–
    Except in cases  LIKE HILLARY CLINTON’S involving national security
    —————————————————
    From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent;36 chains contained Secret information at the time
    ———————————————————————–
    July 5, 2016
    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

    Remarks prepared for delivery at press briefing.

    Good morning. I’m here to give you an update on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

    After a tremendous amount of work over the last year, the FBI is completing its investigation and referring the case to the Department of Justice for a prosecutive decision. What I would like to do today is tell you three things: what we did; what we found; and what we are recommending to the Department of Justice.

    This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.

    I want to start by thanking the FBI employees who did remarkable work in this case. Once you have a better sense of how much we have done, you will understand why I am so grateful and proud of their efforts.

    So, first, what we have done:

    The investigation began as a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General in connection with Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail server during her time as Secretary of State. The referral focused on whether classified information was transmitted on that personal system.

    Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

    Piecing all of that back together—to gain as full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work—has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort.

    click on the link below to read the full text

    Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of …

    https://www.fbi.gov/…/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-…

    Jul 5, 2016Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System. Remarks …

    In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.

    Opinions are irrelevant,  they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation.

  • Trump’s War on Illegal Immigrants and Crime

    Trump’s War on Illegal Immigrants and Crime

    IN SPITE OF THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL  POLITICO ANTI-TRUMP ESTABLISHMENTS Etal. RADICAL PROGRESSIVE OBSTRUCTIONIST.

    —————————————————————————————

    PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS REDUCED THE FLOW OF  ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS  BY 61% AND THE TONS OF KILLER DRUGS THEY BROUGHT WITH THEM INTO OUR HOMELAND.

     ————————————————————————

    STATISTICS FROM LETHAL DRUG OVERDOSES THAT YOU SHOULD KNOW

     IN JUST ONE YEAR 2015, UNDER OBAMA’S LIBERAL CARE THERE WERE  52,404 LETHAL DRUG OVERDOSES IN AMERICA.

    BECAUSE OF THE FAILED POLICIES  LEFT BY OBAMA, DURING  PRESIDENT TRUMP’S  FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE, ON AVERAGE, 13,800 PEOPLE IN AMERICA DIED FROM LETHAL DRUG OVERDOSES.

     JAN 1, 2016 THE UNITED STATES IS EXPERIENCING AN EPIDEMIC OF DRUG OVERDOSE (POISONING) DEATHS. SINCE 2000, THE RATE OF DEATHS FROM DRUG OVERDOSES HAS INCREASED 137%, INCLUDING A 200% INCREASE IN THE RATE OF OVERDOSE DEATHS INVOLVING OPIOIDS (OPIOID PAIN RELIEVERS AND HEROIN).

     INDEED, PRESIDENT TRUMP  HAS REDUCED THE FLOW OF  ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS  BY 61% AND THE TONS OF KILLER DRUGS THEY BROUGHT WITH THEM INTO OUR HOMELAND

    Even the mainstream (LIBERAL) media couldn’t argue with Trump’s claims of a dramatic decrease in illegal immigration since becoming president, as Politifact fact-checked his statements and found that historical data from the Border Patrol backs up his claims.

    ———————————————————————————-

    9 Things You Need To Know About Illegal Immigration And Crime …

    www.dailywire.com/…/9-things-you-need-know-about-illegal-immigration-aaron-ban…

    OCT 22, 2016 – ALMOST 50 PERCENT OF FEDERAL CRIMES WERE COMMITTED NEAR THE MEXICO BORDER. … 5. A DISPROPORTIONATE AMOUNT OF ILLEGALS ARE IN STATE PRISONS.

    ————————————————————————-

    2014, some 69,000 of the 1.6 million state plus federal prisoners were noncitizens, per a September 2015 report by the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics,

    THOUGH WE NOTICED THAT REPORT LACKED COUNTS FOR SEVERAL STATES INCLUDING CALIFORNIA.

    ———————————————————————————-

    OCT 22, 2016 –  A DISPROPORTIONATE AMOUNT OF ILLEGALS ARE IN STATE PRISONS.

    After we circled back to Smith’s office with the figures we’d found, Smith’s deputy chief of staff, Chris Philp, said by email that Smith had meant to tell the delegates

    THAT “ONE-THIRD OF FEDERAL SENTENCES GO TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS,

    NOT THAT ONE-THIRD OF FEDERAL PRISONERS ARE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.”

    MORE TO THE POINT, THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T SORT ALL INMATES BY IMMIGRATION STATUS,

    ——————————————————————————-

    NINE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND CRIME. continued….

    ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND CRIME BECAME A HOT TOPIC THIS ELECTION CYCLE AS SOON AS DONALD TRUMP BURST INTO THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY WITH HIS CALL TO BUILD A WALL TO KEEP CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT OF THE COUNTRY.

    Such policy discussions have fallen by the wayside as the election cycle morphed into a mudslinging fight of personal insults and accusations of sexual assaults, but the link between illegal immigration and crime is still worth discussing, ESPECIALLY SINCE TRUMP’S INITIAL HIGHLIGHTING OF THE ISSUE FUELED HIS RISE.

    HERE ARE NINE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND CRIME.

    1. Federal, state and local governments keep data involving illegal immigration and crime out of the public purview. Fox News reported in 2015 that a source from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said “that comprehensive statistics on illegal immigrant crime are not available from the federal government, and suggested contacting county, state and federal jail and prison systems individually to compose a tally, a process that would encompass thousands of local departments.”

    Former Department of Justice attorney J. Christian Adams also told Fox News that some states do readily track illegal immigration and crime, but they withhold the specific numbers from the public out of fear of backlash from the federal government or for political purposes.

    However, there is still some data that can be pieced together to examine illegal immigration and crime, and evidence suggests that there is a correlation between the two.

    1. Available evidence suggests that illegals are more likely to commit crimes than the rest of the population. Fox News sorted through myriad “local, state and federal statistics” and found that “illegal immigrants are three times as likely to be convicted of murder as members of the general population and account for far more crimes than their 3.5-percent share of the U.S. population would suggest.”

    The percentage of illegals committing the number of crimes are as follows, according to Fox News:

    • 13.6 percent of those sentenced for all committed crimes in the country
    • 12 percent of murder sentences
    • 16 percent of trafficking sentences
    1. Almost 50 percent of federal crimes were committed near the Mexico border. A report from the Department of Justice in 2014 found the following, via Judicial Watch:

    Of the 61,529 criminal cases initiated by federal prosecutors last fiscal year, more than 40%—or 24,746—were filed in court districts neighboring the Mexican border. This includes Arizona, New Mexico, Southern California, Western Texas and Southern Texas. The two Texas districts each had more than double the convictions of all four federal court districts in the state of New York combined, according to the DOJ report. The Western Texas District had the nation’s heaviest crime flow, with 6,341 cases filed by the feds. In Southern Texas 6,130 cases were filed, 4,848 in Southern California, 3,889 in New Mexico and 3,538 in Arizona.

    Not surprisingly, most of the offenses were immigration related. In fact, 38.6% of all federal cases (23,744) filed last year involved immigration, the DOJ report confirms. Nearly 22% (13,383) were drug related, 19.7% (12,123) were violent crimes and 10.2% (6,300) involved white-collar offenses that include a full range of frauds committed by business and government professionals. This is hardly earth-shattering news in fact, the nation’s southern border region has for years been known for its high crime rate compared to the rest of the country.

    Judicial Watch also notes that the crimes near the border had been spiking at such an “alarming rate” that “Mexican and American journalists have largely stopped reporting it,” whether for ideological reasons or to avoid backlash from the drug cartels.

    1. Illegal immigrants accounted for nearly 75 percent of federal drug sentences in 2014.This is according to the United States Sentencing Commission, which also found that illegals were involved in nearly 17 percent of drug-trafficking sentences and over 33 percent of federal sentences overall.
    2. A disproportionate amount of illegals are in state prisons. Peter Kirsanow, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and a lawyer, reviewed statistics from the Government Accountability Office and Pew Research Center and compared the number of illegals and non-illegals imprisoned for murder-related offenses in a 2015 National Review piece. Some of his findings:
    • There were 68.57 illegal aliens imprisoned for every 100,000 illegals in Arizona, compared to 54.06 citizens and legal noncitizens imprisoned for every 100,000 citizens and legal noncitizens.
    • There were 97.2 illegals imprisoned for every 100,000 illegals in California, compared to 74.1 citizens and legal noncitizens imprisoned per 100,000 citizen and legal noncitizens.
    • There were 54.85 illegals imprisoned for every 100,00 illegals in Florida, compared to 67.8 legal immigrants imprisoned for every 100,000 legal immigrants.
    • There were 168.75 illegals imprisoned for every 100,000 illegals in New York, compared to 48.12 legal immigrants imprisoned for every 100,000 legal immigrants.
    • There were 54.54 illegals imprisoned for every 100,000 illegals in Texas, compared to 65.43 legal immigrants .

    Kirsanow acknowledged that while comparing murder incarceration rates isn’t a perfect measurement, “it’s difficult to contend that illegal aliens are more law-abiding than legal residents — at least when it comes to major crimes.” But the more disturbing fact was that “approximately 2,430 illegal aliens are in prison just for homicide-related offenses” in California alone.

    “If one assumes that each illegal alien so imprisoned was responsible for just one homicide-related offense, that amounts to about a couple thousand major crimes that, arguably, wouldn’t have occurred but for the actors’ unlawful presence in the United States,” Kirsanow notes. “That translates to thousands of American citizens (and others) across the country slaughtered by individuals who shouldn’t have been here in the first place.”

    1. Tens of thousands of criminal illegals have been released by ICE and are at large in the country. In 2015, ICE released almost 20,000 illegals that committed 64,000 crimes that involve “12,307 drunken driving convictions, 1,728 cases of assault, 216 kidnappings and more than 200 homicide or manslaughter convictions,” according to the Washington Times. It’s even worse when one considers the fact that the Obama administration released “86,000 illegal immigrants who have committed over 231,000 crimes in just the past two and a half years,” according to Independent Journal Review.
    2. The rise in illegals crossing the border has fueled gang violence. In March, the Daily Caller reported that the barbaric MS-13 gang has been recruiting young illegals, resulting in higher crime in the Washington, D.C area. In fact, Montgomery County in Maryland “has seen an unprecedented level of gang-related violence in the last 8 months – with illegal immigrant youth being responsible for 85 percent of street robberies,” according to IJ Review. The horrors of MS-13 have extended to the Brentwood community in Long Island, NY, where the remains of a dead teenager was found for the fifth time in six weeks, likely the result of MS-13.
    3. Sanctuary cities have hampered law enforcement in cracking down on gangs. Heather Mac Donald documented the frustrations of Los Angeles law enforcement officers in 2004 when they couldn’t touch known gang members because of their status as illegals:

    “We can’t even talk about it,” says a frustrated LAPD captain. “People are afraid of a backlash from Hispanics.” Another LAPD commander in a predominantly Hispanic, gang-infested district sighs: “I would get a firestorm of criticism if I talked about [enforcing the immigration law against illegals].”

    The issue is that these gang members tended to sneak back into the country even after they were deported for heinous crimes, and police officers couldn’t enforce immigration laws against them and would have to resort to surveilling these gang members until they commit a crime.

    While these statistics from Mac Donald’s piece are dated, it illustrates just how badly the sanctuary policy has hampered crime:

    • In Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens.
    • A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal; police officers say the proportion is actually much greater. The bloody gang collaborates with the Mexican Mafia, the dominant force in California prisons, on complex drug-distribution schemes, extortion, and drive-by assassinations, and commits an assault or robbery every day in L.A. County. The gang has grown dramatically over the last two decades by recruiting recently arrived youngsters, most of them illegal, from Central America and Mexico.
    • The leadership of the Columbia Lil’ Cycos gang, which uses murder and racketeering to control the drug market around L.A.’s MacArthur Park, was about 60 percent illegal in 2002, says former assistant U.S. attorney Luis Li. Francisco Martinez, a Mexican Mafia member and an illegal alien, controlled the gang from prison, while serving time for felonious reentry following deportation.

    Unsurprisingly, violent crime has skyrocketed recently in Los Angeles as illegal immigration has surged. In fact, crime among sanctuary cities in general has increased.

    1. Crime has also increased among major cities that are “immigration hubs.” Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro has written:

    David Frum of The Atlantic, no hard-core immigration opponent, wrote in 2015 that as of 2011, there were 25,000 illegal immigrants serving murder sentences, and nearly 3 million offenses committed by illegal immigrants between 2003 and 2009, including 70,000 sex crimes and hundreds of thousands of other violent crimes. “After years of welcome decline,” Frum pointed out, “crime rates are rising in immigration hubs including Houston, Milwaukee, Phoenix, and San Diego.” Former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo reported in 2015 that between “2008 and 2014, 40% of all murder convictions in Florida were criminal aliens. In New York it was 34% and Arizona 17.8%. During those years, criminal aliens accounted for 38% of all murder convictions in the five states of California, Texas, Arizona, Florida and New York, while illegal aliens constitute only 5.6% of the total population in those states.

    Some individual examples of those who were victimized by illegals can be seen here and here.

    ——————————————————————————

    snippets provided from …

    MAY 15, 2016

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-america-cant-quit-the-drug-war-20160505

    AUG 25, 2016

    http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2016/aug/25/lamar-smith/mostly-false-lamar-smith-claim-one-third-federal-i/

    OCT 22, 2016 full unedited text above

    http://www.dailywire.com/news/10155/9-things-you-need-know-about-illegal-immigration-aaron-bandler

    —————————————————————————

    JAN 20, 2017  snippets from

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/20/obama-used-more-clemency-power/

    BARACK OBAMA ENDED HIS PRESIDENCY HAVING GRANTED CLEMENCY TO MORE PEOPLE CONVICTED OF FEDERAL CRIMES THAN ANY CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN 64 YEARS

    OVERALL, OBAMA GRANTED CLEMENCY TO 1,927 INDIVIDUALS, A FIGURE THAT INCLUDES 1,715 COMMUTATIONS AND 212 PARDONS.

    But he, OBAMA, also received far more requests for clemency than any U.S. president on record, LARGELY AS A RESULT OF AN INITIATIVE SET UP BY HIS ADMINISTRATION TO SHORTEN PRISON TERMS FOR NONVIOLENT

    FEDERAL INMATES CONVICTED OF DRUG CRIMES.

    Of course, Obama received such a large number of clemency requests in part BECAUSE HIS ADMINISTRATION ASKED FOR THEM. UNDER A PROGRAM LAUNCHED IN 2014 KNOWN AS THE Clemency Initiative, the Justice Department encouraged “qualified federal inmates– as defined by DOJ criteria – to apply to have their prison sentences commuted. The initiative led to a surge in requests and also helps explain why Obama’s use of clemency tilted so heavily toward sentence commutations, rather than pardons.

    “QUALIFIED FEDERAL INMATES” DEFINED AS?

    THEY ARE NON-VIOLENT, LOW-LEVEL OFFENDERS WITHOUT “SIGNIFICANT?” TIES TO LARGE SCALE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS, GANGS OR CARTELS;

    In his record use of commutations, Obama reduced sentences for federal inmates who were convicted in all 50 states, according to our analysis. Among those who received reduced penalties were 568 individuals serving life sentences and two who had been sentenced to death.

    INDEED, including 1,913 pardons, 118 commutations and 13 remissions – during his nearly eight years in office, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of Department of Justice statistics.

    Note: This is an update of a post originally published Dec. 9, 2016.

    ———————————————————————————– 

    APRIL 27, 2017 snippets from

    5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

    www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/…/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

    4 days ago – The number of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. was lower in 2015 than at the end of the Great Recession. Here are five key findings about …

    LISTED AS NUMBER FOUR (4)

    SIX STATES ACCOUNT FOR 59% of unauthorized immigrants: CALIFORNIA, TEXAS, FLORIDA, NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY AND ILLINOIS.

    But individual states have experienced different trends. From 2009 to 2014, the unauthorized immigrant population decreased in seven states: Alabama, California, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Nevada and South Carolina. In all of them, the decline was due to a decrease in unauthorized immigrants from Mexico.

    IN SIX STATES, THE UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANT POPULATION ROSE OVER THE SAME TIME PERIOD: LOUISIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, NEW JERSEY, PENNSYLVANIA, VIRGINIA AND WASHINGTON.

    IN ALL OF THESE BUT LOUISIANA, THE INCREASES WERE DUE TO GROWTH IN UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANT POPULATIONS FROM NATIONS OTHER THAN MEXICO.

    (IN LOUISIANA, THE OVERALL INCREASE WAS DRIVEN BY AN INCREASE IN MEXICAN UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANTS.)

    To learn more: Explore unauthorized immigrant population trends for states, birth countries and regions, and see an interactive map and detailed table showing our latest estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population by state.

    Note: This post was originally published on Nov. 18, 2014, and has been updated to include more recent data.

    —————————————————————————————

    GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP

    God Bless the U.S.A. by Lee Greenwood – YouTube

     


  • I Learned a Lot Watching CSPAN

    You’re Never too Old to Learn

    I learned a lot watching CSPAN 1 last night, April 29, 2017

    I watched CSPAN 1  LIVE  Stream: of President Donald J. Trump Rally in Harrisburg, PA

    THEN, CSPAN 1  immediately went to

    White House Correspondents’ Association

    www.whca.net/  Fri.  April 28, 2017 White House Correspondents’ Association Announces 2017 Award winners … Over the years, many of our association’s activities have been documented by C-SPAN

    ———————————————————————

    It took me  just a few minutes, clips on President Trump’s Press Meetings and remarks about California Universities for me to link the manipulation and farce of the progressive liberal self serving Correspondents scholarship program…

    However,  it took me all day today researching  to find this Feb 27, 2017 posting on line.

    THE REST OF THE STORY BY PEARL HARVEY…..

    —————————————————————————

    TRUMP TO SKIP WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER: ‘NO REASON FOR HIM TO GO …. TO FUND A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM THAT, IN TURN, FUNDS YOUNG LIBERAL JOURNALISTS.

    Those White House Correspondents’ Association Scholarships | The …

    https://spectator.org/those-white-house-correspondents-association-scholarships/

    Feb 27, 2017 – Trump to skip White House correspondents’ dinner: ‘No reason for him to go …. to fund a scholarship program that, in turn, funds young liberal journalists, … Breitbart or Spectator or Rush or Hannity fan get a shot at writing or …

    —————————————————————————–

    Snippets

    Stop. Catch the last part of that line? This part: “… and recognizing the promising students who represent the next generation of our profession.”

    This is a reference to the fact that the Correspondents’ Dinner uses its proceeds to fund scholarships for those “promising students” who are the “next generation of our profession.” 

    Now. What questions are not being asked here — by journalists? Journalists whose job it is to ask questions.

    What is the elephant in the room that seems to be blissfully ignored?

    WHAT IS THE CENTRAL COMPLAINT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP? And indeed the routine complaint of Republican presidents and presidential candidates (not to mention rank-and-file conservatives) for decades?

    That would be that the media suffers from what seems to be — after several decades of this — an incurable liberal bias. And not by accident, either.

     All those polls taken over the years (like this one from Pew in 2008) repeatedly show a heavy liberal tilt in the journalism community.

    THE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ ASSOCIATION IS BUT A DROP IN THE OCEAN OF TODAY’S MEDIA, YET A LOOK AT THE SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS THE GROUP ADVERTISES ON ITS WEBSITE IS A TELLING IF NOT STARTLING LOOK AT HOW LIBERAL BIAS IN THE MEDIA IS SELF-PERPETUATED, PASSED FROM ONE GENERATION TO THE NEXT.

    Here is the link to the overall site. And a visit here to the section labeled “Scholarships” shows winners from last year with President Obama. And what does the site say? This:

    WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ ASSOCIATION ANNOUNCES 2016 SCHOLARS

    The White House Correspondents’ Association is pleased to announce 18 scholarship winners in partnership with Howard University, Northwestern University, Columbia University, University of Missouri, University of California at Berkeley, University of Maryland, and the George Washington University.

    So far, so good. Then it lists the winners — AND THEIR INTERESTS. Among those interests?

    • A Howard University winner “is determined to write about the plight of what he calls America’s ‘throwaway’ people: the homeless on our streets, often mentally ill, who are sometimes ignored in our society.”
    • A Northwestern University, Medill School of Journalism winner wants “to hone her skills as a political and social justice reporter.”
    • A COLUMBIA SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM WINNER WANTS TO USE HER REPORTING SKILLS FOR “ULTIMATELY FOCUSING ON POLITICAL ISLAM; PROBLEMS FACED BY MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS AND THE WAY RELIGION IN GENERAL AND ISLAM IN PARTICULAR IS ABUSED BY RADICALS IN UNDERDEVELOPED COUNTRIES.”
    • A University of Missouri, Columbia winner says her “favorite stories are those that involve issues of corporate social responsibility.”
    • Another University of Missouri, Columbia winner enjoys “writing about the connectivity of science, health and the environment with social justice issues.”
    • A University of California, Berkeley winner has been writing “for media outlets such as Univision Noticias.”
    • A University of Maryland, College Park winner “does volunteer work with organizations such as the Maryland Association of Black Journalists, the Capitol Area Food Bank, SHARE Food Network and Kaiser Permanente.”

    NOTICE A CURIOUS PATTERN HERE?

    NOT ONE OF THE UNIVERSITIES THAT WHCA PARTNERS WITH HAS A REPUTATION FOR CONSERVATISM. There is, for example, no partnership with a Hillsdale College or Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University or some similar conservative institution of higher learning.

     AND NOTE ALL OF THESE WINNERS ARE INTERESTED IN USING THEIR JOURNALISTIC SKILLS ON ISSUES LIKE SOCIAL JUSTICE, THE HOMELESS, THE ABUSE OF ISLAM BY RADICALS, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MORE.

    STRANGELY, IN TERMS OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM, EVERY ONE OF THESE ISSUES AND MORE ARE TRADITIONALLY IDENTIFIED AS ISSUES IMPORTANT TO LIBERALS.

    Not one of these winners, one suspects, would be into investigating Planned Parenthood. There are, one similarly suspects, no pro-lifers here.

    The winner who contributes to UNIVISION NOTICIAS, famously the home of Trump critics like anchorman JORGE RAMOS, is, one suspects, not eager to be a conservative journalist.

     One can also suspect that these kids will not be seeking writing jobs here at The American Spectator or interning for Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity at Fox. Indeed, Rush informs that to the degree he has used interns in his various projects they are “never from WCHA.” Hannity was a similar negative, when asked. And a query to Wlady Pleszczynski, the editorial director of The American Spectator and editor of AmSpec Online, as to whether there had ever been a WCHA scholarship winner on the premises drew this response: “A joke question, right!?”

    Let’s be clear. Hooray for scholarships. Hooray for ambitious college kids who want a future in journalism. But, at least per the WCHA’s own website, the winners selected by the group for 2016 seem to have been — to a person —

     NOT JUST YOUNG JOURNALISTS IN TRAINING BUT MORE TO THE POINT YOUNG LIBERAL JOURNALISTS IN TRAINING.

     ALL DRAWN FROM A POOL SUPPLIED BY LIBERAL UNIVERSITIES.

     If past WHCA scholarship winners have wound up anywhere in the conservative media — at, say, the Washington Times, Glenn Beck’s the Blaze, National Review, or — gasp! — Breitbart, there is no indication. (Indeed, in the current day, one can only imagine the uproar inside the WHCA, if a scholarship winner was in any way associated with Steve Bannon’s favorite conservative site.)

    Among other things, what the dust-up over President Trump’s non-appearance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner has revealed IS THAT PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ARE USED AS THE MAIN ATTRACTION TO FUND A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM THAT, IN TURN, FUNDS YOUNG LIBERAL JOURNALISTS,

     THE PARTICULAR IRONY BEING THAT REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE BEEN ESSENTIALLY USED TO PERPETUATE THE LIBERAL MEDIA BIAS THAT THEY AND THEIR SUPPORTERS SO FREQUENTLY COMPLAIN OF.

    ————————————————————————————–

    PAUL HARVEY, was an American radio broadcaster for the ABC Radio Networks. He broadcast News and Comment on weekday mornings and mid-days, and at noon on Saturdays, as well as his famous The Rest of the Story segments.

    From the 1950s through the 1990s, Harvey’s programs reached as many as 24 million people a week. Paul Harvey News was carried on 1,200 radio stations, 400 Armed Forces Network stations and 300 newspapers.

    AT THE END OF A REPORT ABOUT SOMEONE WHO HAD DONE SOMETHING RIDICULOUS OR OFFENSIVE, HARVEY WOULD SAY, “SHE WOULD WANT US TO MENTION HER NAME”

    ——————————————————————-

    A CanadianAmerican  SAMANTHA BEE’S SHOW ON SAT APR 29, 2017 WAS  ABSOLUTELY THE MOST OFFENSIVE, LEWD, FILTHY, AND DISGUSTING THING I HAVE EVER WATCHED (part of) ON TELEVISION.

    —————————————————————————————–

    The White House Correspondents’ Association

    USED WALTER CRONKITE AS AN EXAMPLE.

    WALTER CRONKITE’S ADHERENCE TO JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY—EXEMPLIFIED BY HIS SIGN-OFF LINE, “AND THAT’S THE WAY IT IS”—ENDEARED HIM TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, AND A 1972 POLL NAMED HIM “THE MOST TRUSTED MAN IN AMERICA.”

    ———————————————————————————–

    I learned a lot watching  CSPAN 1 last night, April 29, 2017

    You’re Never too Old to Learn

    ————————————————————————

    But, our American children are too young to learn this in Public Schools.

    Behind My Back | I Learned a Lot in School Today

    www.behindmyback.org/2016/09/17/i-learned-a-lot-in-school-today/

    Sep 17, 2016 – I Learned a Lot in School Today WHAT ARE STUDENTS IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEARNING FROM THE 2012 AD COUNCIL …


  • Trump Draining the Swamp in 100 Days?

    Trump Draining the Swamp in 100 Days?

    ON OCT 18, 2016  PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMP DID A NEWS RELEASE AND TWEET ABOUT DRAINING THE SWAMP

    Trump Pledges To Drain The Swamp And Impose Congressional …

    https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/trump-pledges-to-drain-the-swamp

    Oct 18, 2016 – Donald J. Trump is the very definition of the American success story, continually setting the standards of excellence … It is time to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C. … Your jobs will come back under a Trump Administration.

    Together, we are going to deliver real change that puts America First.

    We are going to renegotiate our terrible trade deals, end illegal immigration, stop the massive inflow of refugees, reduce surging crime, cut taxes and regulations, unleash job-producing American energy, rebuild our military and take vote of our Vets, and repeal and replace the disaster known as Obamacare.

    ——————————————————————————–

    THEN ON OCT 22, 2016 – GETTYSBURG, PA: IN HISTORIC GETTYSBURG, PA, DONALD J. TRUMP MADE A CONTRACT WITH AMERICAN VOTERS AND PRESENTED PLAN FOR HIS FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE.

    AND THEN PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS ELECT PRESIDENT NOV 8, 2016

    GLOBALLY  SPEAKING, THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD

    INDEED, IT WASN’T JUST DEMOCRATS AND REJECTED  ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS THAT DIDN’T UNDERSTAND WHY DONALD J. TRUMP WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON NOV 8, 2016.

    AND THEN THE SNOW FLAKES STARTED FALLING, AND…

    Rioting Snowflakes: Hillary Fanatics Burn Flag, Threaten To Kill “Not …

    www.zerohedge.com/…/2016…/rioting-snowflakes-hillary-fanatics-burn-flag-threaten…

    Rioting Snowflakes: Hillary Fanatics Burn Flag, Threaten To Kill “Not My President” Trump. Tyler Durden’s picture. by Tyler … Nov 9, 2016 8:40 PM

    ——————————————————————

    WHAT A FLIPPED OUT TIZZY FIT FEEDING FRENZY THE LIBERAL REPORTERS HAD, WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP ELECTED.

    WHY WAS TRUMP ELECTED PRESIDENT ON NOV 8, 2016?

    LOL THE RUSSIANS DID IT…

    CONSPIRACY THEORY  FAKE NEWS MEDIA BLAH.. BLAH.. BLAH,

    ————————————————————————–

    THANK GOD PRESIDENT ELECT TRUMP WAS  A MULTI-TASKER

    ——————————————————————————

    PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TOOK OFFICE ON JAN 20, 2017

    AND THEN THE PRESIDENT HAD TO DRAIN THE SWAMP

    THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP IS TODAY APR 29, 2017

    HOW MANY OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S  FIRST 100 DAYS WERE SPENT TRACKING DOWN AND FLUSHING OUT THE OBAMA LEFTOVERS, (SES) AND OTHER POLITICO ESTABLISHMENTS BACK STABBERS Etal. LURKING IN THE STAGNANT WATERS OF THE WA DC SWAMP?

    ——————————————————————————-

    INFORMED HARD WORKING AMERICAN CITIZENS KNEW WHY TRUMP WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON NOV 8, 2016

    DONALD TRUMP AND HIS MILLIONS OF DEPLORABLE VOTERS KNEW EXACTLY WHY!

    TO HELL WITH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

    TO HELL WITH THE OFFENDED

    DRAIN THE WA DC SWAMP

    GET RID OF OBAMACARE

    BUILD THE WALL

    MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN

    AMERICA FIRST

    GET RID OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS THAT CRUSHED THE AMERICAN ECONOMY?

    ———————————————————————-

    PRESIDENT TRUMPS FIRST 100 DAYS ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

    REALLY..  HOW FAR BACK SHOULD WE START?

    THE 911 ATTACK? BY TERRORISTS

    THE 17 YEAR WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST?

    OR SHOULD WE JUST START COUNTING  AFTER  EIGHT YEARS OF A TOTALLY DYSFUNCTIONAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP BY OBAMA, HIS PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS AND THE UNACCOMPLISHED ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS?

    OBAMACARE?

    THE 20 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT?

    ————————————————————

    BUT FIRST PRESIDENT TRUMP HAD TO DRAIN THE WA DC SWAMP.

    THANK GOD PRESIDENT TRUMP IS A MULTI-TASKER

    STARTING,  JAN 20, 2017 ONE OF THE MOST REMARKABLE THING THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DID?

    TO HOLD  LISTENING SESSION IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC ISSUES IN THE USA.

    YEP.. IN THE WHITE HOUSE, CABINET ROOM, ROOSEVELT ROOM….

    THERE ARE A LOT OF WAYS TO GET VALUE OUT OF LISTENING SESSIONS, SO, PRESIDENT TRUMP DID A LOT OF  THINKING AND PLANNING AHEAD OF TIME

    Trump holds ‘listening session’ for ‘victims’ of ObamaCare – The Week

    theweek.com/speedreads/685662/trump-holds-listening-session-victims-obamacare

    Mar 13, 2017 – President Trump sat down with a group of frustrated Americans on Monday to talk about the “very, very failed and failing ObamaCare law.

    ———————————————————————

    GO FIGURE…

    CNN CUTS FEED AGAIN. WHITE HOUSE OBAMACARE VICTIMS LISTENING SESSION.

    The Liberty Eagle1024 × 576Search by image

    ————————————————————————————–

    LINKS TO THE REMARKS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP ON LISTENING SESSIONS ARE BELOW

    —————————————————————————-

    ANOTHER REMARKABLE THING, TRUMP DID AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HE STARTED TWEETING ON JAN 20, 2017.

    WHAT A FLIPPED OUT TIZZY FIT FEEDING FRENZY THE REPORTERS HAD, WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP BASICALLY SAID ….

    TO HELL WITH THE LIBERAL BIASED FAUX (FAKE OR FALSE) NEWS MEDIA BLAH.. BLAH…BLAH… 

    CHIEF WHITE HOUSE STRATEGIST STEVE BANNON, CALLED REPORTERS THE “OPPOSITION PARTY” AND SAID “THE MEDIA SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED AND HUMILIATED AND KEEP ITS MOUTH SHUT AND JUST LISTEN FOR A WHILE.”

    —————————————————————————–

    MEANWHILE PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS LISTENING AT THE WHITE HOUSE

    ———————————————————-

    PRESIDENT TRUMP  MADE REMARKS BY ON THE LISTENING SESSIONS

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session with the National Association of Manufacturers

    March 31, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session on Opioids and Drug Abuse

    March 28, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session with the Fraternal Order of Police

    March 28, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump and Veterans Affairs Secretary Shulkin at Veterans Affairs Listening Session

    March 17, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in a Listening Session on Healthcare

    March 13, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in National Economic Council Listening Session with CEOs of Small and Community Banks

    March 07, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Parent-Teacher Conference Listening Session

    March 03, 2017

    Remarks by the Vice President at a Listening Session with Historically Black Colleges and Universities

    February 27, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session with Health Insurance Company CEOs

    February 26, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump at Listening Session on Domestic and International Human Trafficking

    February 23, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session with Members of Congress

    February 15, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in Listening Session with the Retail Industry Leaders Association and Member Company CEOs

    February 14, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump Before SCOTUS Listening Session

    February 09, 2017

    Remarks by President Trump in African American History Month Listening Session

    January 31, 2017

    ————————————————————-

    WHAT HAS OUR REMARKABLE PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCOMPLISHED IN HIS 100 DAYS?

    LISTENING TO AMERICAN CITIZEN

    COMMUNICATING  DIRECTLY WITH US  AND TO US  “WE THE PEOPLE”

    CLICK ON THE TOP LINK FOR  THE FIRST 16 PAGES..

    FROM THE WHITE HOUSE

    ——————————————————

    GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP AND HIS FAMILY

    WITHOUT AMERICA THERE WOULD BE NO FREE WORLD

    WITHOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP THERE WOULD BE NO “AMERICA FIRST”

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

    President Trump Draining the Swamp in 100 Days?

    I say, we give President Trump  a bit more time..

    IT’S A REALLY, REALLY BIG SWAMP

    MAY THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S “AMERICA FIRST” BE CONTINUED FOR 8 MORE YEARS….