+menu-


Ecology’s Expedited Rule Making?

Washington Department of Ecology AO #14-01

NOTICE THIS RULE REPEAL IS BEING PROPOSED UNDER AN EXPEDITED

RULE- MAKING PROCESS THAT WILL

(1)  ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR ECOLOGY TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS?

OBJECTION (1) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 THE PEOPLE, IN DELEGATING AUTHORITY, DO NOT GIVE THEIR PUBLIC SERVANTS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE TO KNOW AND WHAT IS NOT GOOD FOR THEM TO KNOW.

———————————————————————————————————

(2) )  ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR ECOLOGY TO PREPARE A SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT?

OBJECTION (2) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 TO ASSURE THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED.

RCW 19.85.040 Small business economic impact statement — Purpose

————————————————————————————————————

(3)   ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR ECOLOGY TO  PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE CRITERIA FOR A SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATIVE RULE.

OBJECTION (3) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030

THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE DO NOT YIELD THEIR SOVEREIGNTY TO THE AGENCIES THAT SERVE THEM.

The people insist on remaining informed so that they may maintain control over the instruments that they have created.

————————————————————————–

IF YOU OBJECT TO THIS USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS, YOU MUST EXPRESS YOUR OBJECTIONS IN WRITING AND THEY MUST BE SENT TO

Name: Bari Schreiner –Agency Rules Coordinator

Agency: Washington Department of Ecology

Address: PO 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600

E- mail: rulemaking@ecy.wa.gov

——————————————————————————————

INDEED, UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 I DO OBJECT TO THIS USE AND ANY OTHER USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS BY ECOLOGY.

THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE DO NOT YIELD THEIR SOVEREIGNTY TO THE AGENCIES THAT SERVE THEM.

THE PEOPLE, IN DELEGATING AUTHORITY, DO NOT GIVE THEIR PUBLIC SERVANTS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE TO KNOW AND WHAT IS NOT GOOD FOR THEM TO KNOW.

THE PEOPLE INSIST ON REMAINING INFORMED SO THAT THEY MAY MAINTAIN CONTROL OVER THE INSTRUMENTS THAT THEY HAVE CREATED.

This chapter shall be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly construed to promote this public policy and TO ASSURE THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED.

in the event of conflict between the provisions of this chapter and any other act, the provisions of this chapter shall govern.
[2007 c 197 § 2; 2005 c 274 § 283; 1992 c 139 § 2. Formerly RCW 42.17.251.]

————————————————————————————————-

TO ASSURE THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED?

OPEN MEETINGS ACT  42.30.060, Ordinances, rules, resolutions, regulations, etc., adopted at public meetings — Notice — Secret voting prohibited. … 42.30.075, Schedule of regular meetings — Publication in state register — Notice of change …

——————————————————————————————————————

IF YOU OBJECT TO THIS USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS, YOU MUST EXPRESS YOUR OBJECTIONS IN WRITING AND THEY MUST BE SENT TO ECOLOGY?

INDEED, UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 I DO OBJECT TO THIS USE  AND ANY OTHER USE OF THE EXPEDITED RULE-MAKING PROCESS BY ECOLOGY.

————————————————————————————————–

OBJECTION (1) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 THE PEOPLE, IN DELEGATING AUTHORITY, DO NOT GIVE THEIR PUBLIC SERVANTS THE RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE TO KNOW AND WHAT IS NOT GOOD FOR THEM TO KNOW.

————————————————————————————————–

OBJECTION (2) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030 TO ASSURE THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED.

—————————————————————————

OBJECTION (3) UNDER WA STATE RCW 42.56.030

THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE DO NOT YIELD THEIR SOVEREIGNTY TO THE AGENCIES THAT SERVE THEM.

The people insist on remaining informed so that they may maintain control over the instruments that they have created.

—————————————————————————-

Mar 10, 2014 – … AN IMPACT ON STATE FOIA. HERE IS A LIST OF OPEN MEETINGS LAWSUITS IN WASHINGTON. … THE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE OF THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT STATES?

WA STATE RCW 42.56.030

Comments are closed.