+menu-


  • Trump America Great America Strong

    Trump America Great America Strong

    America’s  gonna  get right back to where it  started from.

    Nov  8, 2016 America’s  Declaration of Independence

    That this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom under  President Donald J. Trump — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

    ———————————–

    PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST DAY OFFICE

    Sorta like…The Articles of Confederation,  on day one, in collaboration with the best minds in America, Trump shall revise every executive order of Obama. Every illegal  and job killing  executive order and Obama care shall be repealed.

    THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

    THE BILL OF RIGHT

    ———————————————————————————-

    America’s  gonna  get right back to where it  started from.

    Years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

    Now we are engaged in a great civil election war 2015-2016, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, shall endure.

    We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to rededicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that, that nation might live.

    It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

    We must never forget the brave men, living and dead, who struggled here.

    THE WORLD “WILL” LONG NOTE, AND “WILL” LONG REMEMBER WHAT AMERICAN VOTERS DO  ON NOV 8, 2016.

    THE WORLD WILL NEVER FORGET WHAT “WE THE PEOPLE” DO HERE.

    It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the sustain the  work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

    It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task before us

    That from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion.

    That we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain

    THAT THIS NATION, UNDER GOD, SHALL HAVE A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM ON NOE 8, 2016  —

    AND THAT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH.

    ———————————————————-

    Sept 22, 2016

    America’s Gonna Get Right Back Where It Started From

     Yep,  it’s alright and it’s coming along

    Trump’s up in the polls

    America’s gonna get right back to where it started from

    THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

    Trump is good, Trump will be strong
    America’s gonna get right back to where it started from

    THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

    ———————————–

    Do you remember that day

    When Trump first came our way
    Everyone said he couldn’t take first place

    Trump, Not a politician and politically incorrect
    And if you get hurt by the little things I say

     What’s more fun than a Trump Rally
    I can put that smile back on your face

    Yep, it’s alright and it’s coming along

    Trump’s up in the polls

    America’s gonna get right back to where it started from

    Trump is good, Trump will be strong
    America’s gonna get right back to where it started from


    America is here to stay
    Trump won’t give our country away

    America first Americanization not Globalization

     TRUMP’S DEPLORABLE SUPPORTERS  KNOW, TRUMP IS THE ONLY U.S PRESIDENT

    THAT SHALL MAKE AMERICA SAFE AND GREAT AGAIN


  • Einstein Wonderful Learning in School

    Albert Einstein, (1879 – 1955)

    “BEAR IN MIND THAT THE WONDERFUL THINGS YOU LEARN IN YOUR SCHOOLS ARE THE WORK OF MANY GENERATIONS. ALL THIS IS PUT IN YOUR HANDS AS YOUR INHERITANCE IN ORDER THAT YOU MAY RECEIVE IT, HONOR IT, ADD TO IT, AND ONE DAY FAITHFULLY HAND IT ON TO YOUR CHILDREN.”

    ————————————————

    AMERICAN PARENTS AND CHILDREN HAVE A PROBLEM

    The Federal Takeover of Education: From LBJ to Common Core

    Sept 20, 2016  BEAR IN MIND THAT THE DEPLORABLY NEGATIVE  THINGS OUR CHILDREN ARE LEARNING IN AMERICA’S PUBLIC  SCHOOLS ARE THE WORK OF MANY GENERATIONS. AND THE AD COUNCIL 2012-2016

    ————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Sept 20, 2016  WHAT’S THE PROBLEM?

    I Learned a Lot in School Today

     LEARNED FROM THE AD COUNCIL 2012-2016

    INDEED, Parents have a very difficult time getting elected politicians to change bad laws

    ————————————-

    Today in school I LEARNED a lot

    In Chemistry I LEARNED that no one likes me

    In English I LEARNED that I’m am disgusting

    And In Physics I  LEARNED that I am a looser

    Today in school

    I LEARNED that I am ugly and useless

    And In Gym I LEARNED that I’m  pathetic and a  joke

    In History I LEARNED that I am trash

    Today in History I LEARNED I have no friends

    Today English  I LEARNED that I make people sick

    At lunch I sit alone because I smell

    In Biology I LEARNED that I am fat and stupid

    And in Math I LEARNED that I am trash

    The only thing I didn’t learn is why no one helps

    —————————————————————-

    SOLUTION TO THIS DEPLORABLE LEARNING PROBLEM?

    The Federal Takeover of Education: From LBJ to Common Core

    ELECT DONALD J. TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

    “ELIMINATE COMMON CORE” NO MORE PROBLEM.


  • In An Apparent Shell Game S.2012

    The bill in question is No. S.2012 -the North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2016

    In an apparent “SHELL GAME” likely intended to disguise a hidden agenda and to confuse the American public, Congress is considering “BEHIND CLOSED DOORS” two versions of S.2012.

    U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK-R) is pushing a massive 792 page Senate Energy bill incorporating more than 393 amendments covering these and other policy areas

    ———————————————-

    Polson, Montana –September 14, 2016

    According to nonprofit Western States Constitutional Rights, LLC,

    S.2012 contains VERY harmful tribal government forest management provisions that could severely diminish the constitutionally protected rights of western and rural private property owners throughout the  United States

    In an apparent “SHELL GAME” likely intended to disguise a hidden agenda and to confuse the American public, Congress is considering “BEHIND CLOSED DOORS” two versions of S.2012.

    ———————————————————————–

    Why would the Politico’s establishment of this Congressional Mumbo Jumbo confuse the American public?

    —————————————————————-

    snippet…

    It is understood that the Senate passed the Murkowski version without forestry measures in April 2016, while the U.S. House of Representatives passed a second version with both forestry and tribal forest management measures in May 2016,namely,H.R. 2647 –the Resilient Federal

    Forests Act of 2015. H.R. 2647 was sponsored by Representative Bruce Westerman (AR-R) and cosponsored by 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats. It seems H.R. 2647 was incorporated within the House version of S.2012 via an amendment adding new Title VII as part of “Division B, Titles I-X”.1 On September 8, 2016, the two versions of House/Senate S.2012 were submitted to a Congressional conference committee to be reconciled for ultimate passage by both chambers and signature into law by President Obama.

    ———————————————–

    DON’T WAIT UNTIL S.2012 IS PASSED  BY CONGRESS, LIKE OBAMACARE, TO FIND OUT WHAT’S IN THE NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY SECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF 2016  

    We the People must demand an end to the secrecy, shady backroom deals, and usurpation of our natural and constitutional freedoms and property rights.

    ————————————————————–

    WELL NOT REALLY…

    WE THE PEOPLE MUST INFORM AMERICAN CITIZENS REGARDING USURPATION’S of  S.2012

    THAN ON NOV 8, 2016 WE THE PEOPLE  VOTE FOR TRUMP.

    AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRUMP PUTS AN END TO ALL OF THE SECRECY, SHADY BACKROOM DEALS, AND USURPATION OF OUR NATURAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS.

    ENDING A MASSIVE  NUMBER OF GOVERNMENT USURPATION’S

    By definition an act of usurping; wrongful or illegal encroachment, infringement, or seizure.

    INCLUDING OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS

    —————————————————————-

    A UN and tribal takeover? – Canada Free Press

    canadafreepress.com/…/energybillshidden-tribal-forest-management-amp-other-pro

    2 days ago – Hidden provisions in congressional energy bills undermine America’s … of private property owners throughout the United States, the Western States … shared by many citizens throughout the western and rural United States.

     

    By Lawrence Kogan —— Bio and Archives September 17, 2016

    A MASSIVE 792-PAGE SENATE ENERGY COMMITTEE BILL THREATENS TO AUTHORIZE FEDERAL BUREAUCRATS TO CEDE EXTENSIVE CONTROL OVER WESTERN STATE WATER AND PROPERTY RIGHTS, ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND FOREST MANAGEMENT TO NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES, LOCAL UN SUSTAINABILITY COUNCILS AND RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALIST GROUPS.

     CERTAIN PROVISIONS COULD UNDERMINE THE FOUNDATIONS OF OUR NATION FROM WITHIN OUR NATION.

    S.2012, the North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2016, incorporates some 393 amendments. Incredibly, it is being driven forward by U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and other members of Congress behind closed doors. Probably very few have read the bill in its entirety. Virtually none understand its likely impacts on western and other rural land, water and property rights, potentially throughout America, or on the families and communities whose lives will be upended.

    This secretive approach—with no opportunities for meaningful public examination or comment, even by those who will be most affected—is almost unprecedented. It could well become another example of “we have to pass it to find out what’s in it.” But numerous people will have to live with the consequences, while the authors and implementers walk away exempted, unscathed and unaccountable.

    The bill’s tribal government forest management provisions are extremely harmful and could severely diminish the constitutionally protected rights of private property owners throughout the United States, the Western States Constitutional Rights consortium emphasizes. Indeed, the pending legislation is itself unconstitutional, as explained in a legal memorandum the consortium sent to 13 members of Congress.

    This Montana-based nonprofit was formed to safeguard the property rights of farmers, ranchers and other land and business owners against reckless federal, state and local government laws, regulations and policies. WSCR members live on or near the Flathead Irrigation Project within the Flathead Indian Reservation, and in other parts of northwestern Montana. But their concerns are widely shared by many citizens throughout the western and rural United States. It has a long, hard road ahead on these issues.

    The apparent “shell game” is likely intended to disguise a hidden agenda and confuse people. In fact, Congress is quietly considering two versions: a Senate-passedMurkowski version without forestry measures and a House of Representatives version with both forestry and tribal forest management measures (H.R. 2647, the Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2015, sponsored by Representative Bruce Westerman (R-AR) and cosponsored by 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats). Bipartisan chicanery.

    On September 8, the two versions were submitted to a conference committee, to be reconciled so that both chambers can pass a bill and President Obama can sign it into law. The problems are extensive.

    The House/Senate versions’ forestry measures embrace Euro-UN-Agenda 21 sustainable forest management principles, plus United Nations Indigenous Peoples Rights policies that would supersede the U.S. Constitution—while implementing unscientific climate change and sustainability objectives devised by the White House and “Forest Service Strategic Energy Framework.”

    Tribal Forest Management (TFM) provisions in House/Senate S.2012 are more problematic, because they would racially discriminate in favor of Native American tribes. They would do so by using the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to recognize off-reservation aboriginal pre-European land and water rights—where none exist in U.S. law—at the expense of all other Americans’ constitutionally protected private property rights. S.2012s’ TFM provisions would also:

    • Supplant states’ authority and jurisdiction over their natural resources, as recognized by the Tenth Amendment requirement that these resources be held in “public trust” for the benefit of each state’s citizens—including incredibly hard-working western ranchers who put so much food on your table.
    • Enable Native American Tribes to treat “Federal Forest Lands” (including national forests and national parks belonging to all Americans) as “Indian Forest Lands,” merely by establishing that “the Federal forest land is located within, or mostly within, a geographical area that presents a feature or involves circumstances principally relevant to that Indian tribe.” That means a tribe only has to show that the lands are covered by an Indian treaty, are part of a current or former Indian reservation, or were once adjudicated by the former Indian Claims Commission as part of a “tribal homeland.”
    • Provide Native American Tribes near U.S. national forest and park lands with federal “638” contracts to manage, oversee and control such lands and appurtenant water resources for federal regulatory and other purposes, even when they are well beyond the boundaries of Indian reservations.
    • Expand tribal political sovereignty and legal jurisdiction and control, especially over mountainous forest lands—the source of most snowpack and other waters that farmers, ranchers, and even towns and cities rely on for irrigation, drinking and other water needs.
    • Enable tribes to impose new federal fiduciary trust obligations on the U.S. government to protect their religious, cultural and spiritual rights to fish, waters and lands located beyond the boundaries of Indian reservations, by severely curtailing non-tribal members’ constitutionally protected private water and land rights, without paying “just compensation” as required by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    A recently filed federal lawsuit by the Hoopa Valley Tribe of northern California against the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service underscores the importance of this so-called federal fiduciary trust obligation. The tribe wants to compel the agencies to protect the tribe’s alleged off-reservation aboriginal pre-European water and fishing rights in southern Oregon’s Klamath River and Upper Klamath Lake—even though their reservation is more than 240 miles southwest of the lake!

    A tribal court victory would severely curtail Klamath irrigators’ ability to exercise their rights to vitally needed water. Northern California’s Yurok Tribe says it will soon file its own lawsuit. A cascade of such legal actions would disrupt or destroy the entire western water rights system.

    Combined with S.3013 (Montana Democrat Senator John Tester’s Salish and Kootenai Water Rights Settlement Act), the TFM provisions would expand and codify into federal law off-reservation aboriginal water and fishing rights that the tribes now claim. That precedent could then be used by other litigious tribes to override water and private property public trust obligations that Montana, Oregon, California and other western states owe their citizens under state constitutions. It could happen throughout America!

    S.2012 would cause even more problems if Congress adds a Wyden-Merkley Amendment that provides federal funding and implementation for the controversial Klamath Basin Agreements Tribal Rights Settlement. That would greatly expand tribal water rights, in violation of U.S. constitutional requirements that any such expansion be pursuant to Congress’s authority to approve or reject interstate compacts or regulate commerce with Indian tribes.

    It would also create a federal and interstate template for greatly diminishing regional—and potentially all irrigators’—state-based private property rights, in favor of Native American tribes. Its proponents have grossly misrepresented the settlement’s alleged benefits and substantially understated the damage it would impose on Klamath Basin residents.

    If S.2012 is enacted into law with the tribal forest management, Wyden-Merkley Amendment and Salish-Kootenai Settlement, Congress will cede control over western and rural lands and waters to Native American tribes in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth, Ninth, Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

    This year’s presidential and congressional elections are a referendum on the role and performance of government.

    We the People must demand an end to the secrecy, shady backroom deals, and usurpation of our natural and constitutional freedoms and property rights.

    Congress’ immediate withdrawal or modification of this grotesque omnibus energy bill would be a good first step in this direction.

    Lawrence Kogan is managing principal of The Kogan Law Group, PC of New York, NY and legal counsel to Western States Constitutional Rights, LLC.

    —————————————-

    Just asking?

    Why would the Politico’s establishment of this Congressional Mumbo Jumbo confuse the American public?

    ————————————————————————————–

    This West Is OUR West: Uniting Western States – Protecting Our Rights

    thiswestisourwest.com/

    Energy Bill’s Hidden Provisions UndermineS.2012 – the North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2016, which many in Congress … protected rights of western and rural private property owners throughout the United States.

    BREAKING NEWS September 15, 2016

    WESTERN STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, LLC

    PRESS RELEASE

    Energy Bill’s Hidden Provisions Undermine Western and Rural U.S. Property Owners

    The following press release is based on a recently prepared memorandum of law and

    correspondences dispatched to 13 members of Congress explaining the unconstitutionality of pending legislation discussed below

    Polson, Montana – September 14, 2016 –

    Energy and forest management are not generally assumed to be interrelated policies.

    Nevertheless, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK-R) is pushing a massive 792-page Senate Energy bill incorporating more than 393 amendments covering these and other policy areas. The bill in question is No. S.2012 – the North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2016, which many in Congress have not likely read.

    According to nonprofit Western States Constitutional Rights, LLC, S.2012 contains VERY harmful tribal government forest management provisions that could severely diminish the constitutionally protected rights of western and rural private property owners throughout the United States.

    In an apparent “SHELL GAME” likely intended to disguise a hidden agenda and to confuse the American public, Congress is considering BEHIND CLOSED DOORS two versions of S.2012.

    —————————————————————————————-

    A shell game is a shell game….. by hook,  by crooks or by the U.S. Congress

    Behind My Back | The “RESTORATION” Shell Game

    www.behindmyback.org/2014/06/09/the-restorationshellgame/

    Jun 9, 2014 – The “RESTORATIONShell Game. A highly convoluted “GAME OF RESTORATION” that is involving the sleight of many, many hands, in which …

    ——————————————————————————

    Read more on Pie N Politics

    News from Klamath Basin Crisis.org

    by Liz Bowen

     

    http://klamathbasincrisis.org/billslaws/2016/Energybillshiddenprovisions091516.pdf

    —————————————————————————-

    Western States Constitutional Rights, LLC is a Montana-based nonprofit entity the mission of which is to promote the protection of private property rights held by western United States property owners against reckless federal, state and local government laws, regulations and policies. Its members are irrigators, landowners and business owners located on or near the Flathead Irrigation Project situated within the Flathead Indian Reservation, and from other areas in northwestern Montana, but their concerns are widely shared by many citizens throughout the western and rural United States.

    All media inquiries should be directed to The Kogan Law Group, P.C., NY, NY, Western States Constitutional Rights, LLC’s legal counsel, at: 212-644-9240.

    —————————————————————–

    Energy,  forest management  and TRIBES are not generally assumed to be interrelated policies.

    Connecting the dots on  Senator Murkowski….

    Senator  Murkowski  (R) is an active member of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs and served as Vice Chairman of the Committee during the 110th Congress. She is the Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and a member of the Committee on Appropriations, She was honored with a Congressional Leadership Award by the National Congress of American Indians


  • Trump Fundamental Truth 1787-2016

     Trump Fundamental Truth  1787-2016

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    Reacting to the explosion Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, said:

    “It’s a terrible thing what’s going on in our world, what’s going on in our country, but we are going to get tough and smart and vigilant and we are going to end it.”

    —————————————————————

    Full Speech: Donald Trump Rally in Colorado Springs, CO (9/17/2016 …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBJBTUBM8ds
    17 hours ago – Uploaded by Donald Trump Speeches & Events

    WATCH LIVE: Donald Trump Rally in Colorado Springs, CO at JetCenters of Colorado (9/17/2016) – Full …

     

    ————————————————————————

    We hold these truths to be self evident. America is a nation, attacked by external force and convulsed by domestic insurrections.

    That is exactly why the Trump is up in the Polls.

    ———————————————————————–

    New York blast ‘obviously an act of terrorism,’ Cuomo says – CNN.com

    www.cnn.com/2016/09/18/us/new-yorkexplosion/
    CNN

    6 mins ago – New York (CNN) [Breaking news update at 12:35 p.m. ET]. FBI investigators are still collecting evidence from the scene of a bombing Saturday …

    Sept 19, 2016 We hold these truths to be self evident.

    ——————————————————-

    1787  The United States of America

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    At the time of its founding, the United States was a weak and fledgling nation, unique in claiming its republican institutions, extremely vulnerable to the great powers that dominated the world. Its objectives were to strengthen its constitutional government, build an adequate military capacity to defend itself, and, if possible, remove European influence from the North American continent.

    If America failed in this, Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 11, it would become “the instrument of European greatness.

    ” But if it succeeded, it would be “superior to the control of all transatlantic force or influence and be able to dictate the terms of the connection between the old and the new world.”

    Alexander Hamilton essay’s MAIN PURPOSE IS TO FORCE CITIZENS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING compared with the ideas of the Constitution.

    However, Hamilton knows the difficulty of convincing someone to replace something they are comfortable with. He reminds the people of how they “depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” and PRESENTS THEM WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”. Hamilton even states that if the Constitution was not ratified, the existing Union would be completely destroyed.

    Alexander Hamilton writes THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”

    —————————————————————————————

    Constitution for the United States of America

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    ———————————————————————————–

    A great example of the Founders’ prudence is their early foreign policy. It is often said that the American Founders were isolationists and that the principle of their FOREIGN POLICY was to withdraw from the world in favor of focusing solely on the home front.

    ——————————————————————————

    A great example of the Trump’s prudence is his foreign policy.

    “Trump Americanization not Globalization”

     Trumps objectives strengthen Americas  constitutional government,

    Build an adequate military capacity to defend itself

    And, remove the globalization of the European Union, United Nations rule etal. from the United States of America.

    TRUMP WILL BUILD A WALL

    And  focus  solely on America’s  home front.

    Trump “My FOREIGN POLICY WILL ALWAYS put the interests of the American people and American security first.”

    Trump “No American citizen WILL EVER AGAIN feel that their needs come second to the citizens of foreign countries”

    TRUMP PRESENTS AMERICAN CITIZENS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”

    TRUMPS FIRST PURPOSE IS “TRUTH”, TO INFORM AMERICA CITIZENS SO THEY WILL UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING

    TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY EMPHASIZED THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”

    ———————————————————–

    Trump will be a President of Constitutional Law and Order for We the People of the United States

    Trump America First

    1. Trump shall Establish American JUSTICE First
    2. Trump shall Insure America’s DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY First
    3. Trump shall Provide for America’s COMMON DEFENSE First
    4. Trump shall Promote America’s GENERAL WELFARE First
    5. Trump shall Secure THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY to American’s First
    6. Trump shall Secure THE BLESSINGS OF POSTERITY to American’s First

    ——————————————————————–

    Trump Fundamental Truth  1787-2016

    We hold these truths to be self evident.

    —————————————————————-

    We Still Hold These Truths: Rediscovering Our Principles, Reclaiming …

    https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1497636477

    Matthew Spalding – 2014 – ‎Political Science

    If America failed in this, Alexander Hamilton warned in Federalist 11, it would become “the instrument of European greatness.” But if it succeeded, it would be …

    ————————————————————-

    Federalist Papers Summaries Flashcards | Quizlet

    https://quizlet.com/45647368/federalist-papers-summaries-flash-cards/

    Quizlet

    Alexander Hamilton of New York asked James Madison of Virginia and John Jay to help him persuade the New York convention to ratify …. The Federalist 11 … 15, Hamilton warns citizens that the states are on the verge of national humiliation.

    ————————————————————————

     United States of America 1787

    “Remarks of James Wilson in the Pennsylvania Convention to Ratify the Constitution of the United States, 1787,”

    The United States now exhibit to the world,

    the first instance, as far as we can learn,

    of a nation,

    unattacked by external force,

    unconvulsed by domestic insurrections,

    assembling voluntarily, deliberating fully, and deciding calmly, concerning that system of government,

    under which they would wish that they and their posterity should live.[35]

    ————————————————————-

    The bottom line…

    Sept 19, 2016 We hold these truths to be self evident.

    America is a nation, attacked by external force and convulsed by domestic insurrections

     TRUMP PRESENTS AMERICAN CITIZENS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A “GOOD GOVERNMENT”

    TRUMPS FIRST PURPOSE IS “TRUTH”, TO INFORM AMERICA CITIZENS SO THEY WILL UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEIR CURRENT GOVERNMENT IS NOT WORTH KEEPING

    TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY EMPHASIZED THAT ENERGY IN THE EXECUTIVE IS “THE LEADING CHARACTER IN THE DEFINITION OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”


  • I Learned a Lot in School Today

    I Learned a Lot in School Today

    WHAT ARE STUDENTS IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEARNING FROM THE 2012  AD COUNCIL BULLING MESSAGE?

    Get the picture, take exactly one minute and one second to watch it.

    Bullying Prevention: Learning 60 (2012) Ad Council Radio PSA …

    ▶ 1:01

    ————————————————————————

    Today in school I LEARNED a lot

    In Chemistry I LEARNED that no one likes me

    In English I LEARNED that I’m am disgusting

    And In Physics I l LEARNED that I am a looser

    Today in school

    I LEARNED that I am ugly and useless

    and In Gym I LEARNED that I’m  pathetic and a  joke

    In History I LEARNED that I am trash

    Today in History I LEARNED I have no friends

    Today English  I LEARNED that I make people sick

    At lunch I sit alone because I smell

    In Biology I LEARNED that I am fat and stupid

    And in Math I LEARNED that I am trash

    The only thing I didn’t learn is why no one helps

    ———————————————————

    This negative feelings of self worth  Ad Council message on bullying has been on TV since 2012

    Let’s ask the kids that did the video?

    What did you learn making the bullying video message for the Ad Council?

    did they learn a lot from the Ad Council on how to vocalize their negative feelings of self worth  

    ADJECTIVES OF NEGATIVE FEELINGS VOCABULARY WORD LIST (168)

    A) Abandoned, Abused, Accused, Afraid, Aggravated, Aggressive, Angry, Anguished, Annoyed, Anxious, Apprehensive, Argumentative, Ashamed, Atrocious, Avoided, Awkward

     

    B) Badgered, Banned, Beaten, Belittled, Berated, Betrayed, Bitter, Blamed, Bored, Bothered, Bullied, Bummed

     

    C) Careless, Cheated, Clumsy, Coerced, Combative, Compared, Conflicted, Confronted, Confused, Convicted, Cornered, Crabby, Cranky, Creepy, Criticized, Crummy, Cut off, Cynical

     

    D) Damaged, Dangerous, Dazed, Deceived, Defamed, Defiant, Deficient, Dejected, Demeaned, Depleted, Depressed, Deprived, Deserted, Desolate, Despairing, Desperate, Despicable, Despised, Detached, Detested, Devalued, Different, Disappointed, Disapproved of, Discarded, Disconnected, Discriminated against, Disdained, Disgraced, Disgusted, Disliked, Dismayed, Displeased, Disrespected, Dissatisfied, Distraught, Distressed, Doubted, Drained, Duped

     

    E) Edgy, Embarrassed, Enraged, Excluded, Exploited

     

    F) Fed up, Forced, Frightened, Frustrated, Furious

     

    G) Glum, Grief-stricken, Grumpy

     

    H) Harassed, Hassled, Hated, Haunted, Heartbroken, Hindered, Horrified, Humiliated, Hysterical

     

    I) Ignorant, Imposed upon, Incapable, Incompetent, Ineffective, Inefficient

     

    J) Jealous, Judged

     

    K) Kept out

     

    L) Labeled, Left out, Lied to, Lonely, Lost, Lousy

     

    M) Mad, Miffed, Miserable, Mistaken, Mistrusted, Misunderstood, Mixed up, Moody

     

    N) Nagged, Neurotic

     

    O) Obligated, Obsessed, Offended, Ostracized, Overwhelmed

     

    P) Pained, Panicked, Paranoid, Pessimistic, Petrified, Powerless, Pressured, Put down, Puzzling

     

    Q) Questioned

     

    R) Rejected, Resentful, Ridiculous, Rotten

     

    S) Sad, Sarcastic, Scared, Selfish, Singled out, Spiteful, Stressed out, Stupid, Suffering, Suicidal

     

    T) Threatened

     

    U) Useless

     

    V)

     

    W) Worried, Worried

     

    X)

     

    Y)

     

    Z) Zero

    ——————————————————————————-

    WHAT DID WE LEARN IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOL?

    Sticks and stones make break my bones but names will never hurt me.

    What did the kids really learn in school?

    What are American kids learning from the 2012 Ad Council Video?

    NEGATIVE FEELINGS OF SELF WORTH AND MORE…. 

    SELF-DEGRADATION?  SELF PITY? AND LEARNED HELPLESSNESS? repeated painful or otherwise aversive stimuli, a condition in which a person suffers from a sense of powerlessness, arising from a traumatic event or persistent failure to succeed.

    LEARNED HELPLESSNESS IS THOUGHT TO BE ONE OF THE UNDERLYING CAUSES OF DEPRESSION.

    AND REALLY? THE ONLY THING THESE STUDENTS  DIDN’T LEARN IN SCHOOL TODAY IS WHY NO ONE HELPS?

    —————————————————————————-

    AMERICAN KIDS  ARE LIVING WHAT THEY LEARN

    WHAT DID KIDS LEARN FROM THE AD COUNCIL VIDEO?

    NEGATIVE FEELINGS OF SELF WORTH AND MORE…. 

    SELF-DEGRADATION?  SELF PITY?  LEARNED HELPLESSNESS?

    WHAT ARE KIDS LEARNING IN SCHOOL?

    ———————————————————————–

    Read it again…. You decide….

    ————————————————

    Today in school I LEARNED a lot

    In Chemistry I LEARNED that no one likes me

    In English I LEARNED that I’m am disgusting

    And In Physics I l LEARNED that I am a looser

    Today in school

    I LEARNED that I am ugly and useless

    and In Gym I LEARNED that I’m   pathetic and a  joke

    In History I LEARNED that I am trash

    Today in History I LEARNED I have no friends

    Today English  I LEARNED that I make people sick

    At lunch I sit alone because I smell

    In Biology I LEARNED that I am fat and stupid

    And in Math I LEARNED that I am trash

    The only thing I didn’t learn is why no one helps

    Bullying Prevention: Learning 60 (2012) Ad Council Radio PSA …

    ▶ 1:01

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P18WLCoV7pY

    Oct 22, 2014 – Uploaded by Michael Anthony Vongkeomany

    Bullying Prevention: Learning 60 (2012) Ad Council Radio PSA … Sign in to add this video to a playlist …

    ————————————————————————————

    WHATEVER 2012-2016 ONE THING LEADS TO ANOTHER

    STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT? BULLYING? FROM NFL JOCK, KAEPERNICK?

    How to gain the national spotlight? Save his career? How to disrespect the American flag, support black lives matter and call it free speech? How to have a Ethnic pity party and call it oppression?

    ————————

    LEARNING  WHAT  FROM THE U.S. PRESIDENT?

    Obama joins with NFL: Supports Kaepernick and Black Lives Matter

    www.redstate.com/diary/…/obama-joins-nfl-supports-kaepernick-black-lives-matter/

    Sep 6, 2016 – As a result, Obama essentially stated his agreement with Kaepernick’s Black Lives Matter rant about the oppression and murder of black people …

    —————————————

    PUBLIC EDUCATION AND THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT?

    Teachers at a Washington State John Muir state elementary school plan to wear Black Lives Matter shirts in class Friday to protest “systemic oppression”

    SEPT 16, 2016 AT THE  K-5 John Muir Elementary School  in the IN THE Seattle Public School district. AND, the Narrative, would have included 100 African American men FROM THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT.  coincided with some teachers planning to wear “Black Lives Matter” shirts at school. …

     Seattle Public Schools receives threats, cancels event for ‘Black Men …

    www.kiro7.com/news/local/seattle-public-schools-receives…black…/446452176

    1 day ago – Seattle Public Schools has cancelled a celebration at John Muir Elementary School on Friday that would have included 100 African American men in the Narrative,” coincided with some teachers planning to wear “Black Lives Matter” shirts at school. … KIRO 7 (@KIRO7Seattle) September 16, 2016.

     Elementary School Teachers To Wear Black Lives Matter Shirts … in Seattle will be wearing t-shirts at school on September 16th. The school is a K-5 school in the Seattle Public School district.

    ————————————————————–

    WHATEVER 2012-2016 ONE DEPLORABLE THING LEADS TO ANOTHER

    WHAT DID WE LEARN IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOL?

    Sticks and stones make break my bones but names will never hurt me.

    I’M A DEPLORABLE TRUMP VOTER.

    TRUMP SHALL GET RID OF COMMON CORE EDUCATION.


  • Lankford Letter The Judgment Fund to Iran

    Sept 16, 2016 Lankford Letter The Judgment Fund to Iran

    Who knew? I’d never heard of “The Judgment Fund” until I read the Lankford Letter.

    HOW DOES THE JUDGMENT FUND OPERATE TODAY?

    BY DEFINITION, IT REQUIRES NO FURTHER CONGRESSIONAL ACTION AND DOES NOT EXPIRE AT THE CLOSE OF ANY FISCAL YEAR.

    THE APPROPRIATION MAKES AN “UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF FUNDS” AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    NEGOTIATED AND AGREED TO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

    ————————————————

    From: Sen. James Lankford

    To: phew@wavecable.com

    Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 8:49 AM

    Subject: Lankford Letter

    Tax money to the Iranian military

    snippet

    This is a bigger issue than a single payment, no matter how large. The cash money sent to Iran changes our historic foreign policy of isolating Iran as the largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world, and it sets a new precedent for sending money to foreign governments from the long-established Judgment Fund. To deal with the long-term precedent, I authored a bill to limit the future use of THE JUDGMENT FUND and make sure no future president can transfer American tax dollars to a nation that sponsors terrorism. 

    Click here to open this e-mail in its own browser window   Click here to open a plain text version of this email

    —————————————————————–

    JUL 14, 2016  RE: THE JUDGMENT FUND (click on the link)

    Senators Fischer and Lankford Introduce Bill to Expose Taxpayer Funds Transferred to Iran

    ————————————————————-

    After spending nearly five  hours, researching, reading and documenting

    A 19 PAGE DOCUMENT BY CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE

    The Judgment Fund (or Fund) is a permanent appropriation enacted by Congress in 1956. The Fund is an unlimited amount of money set aside to pay judgments against the United States.

    The Judgment Fund: History, Administration, and Common Usage

    https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42835.pdf

    Federation of American Scientists Mar 7, 2013 – In the 113th Congress, the Judgment Fund Transparency Act of 2013 ( …. The U.S. government has sovereign immunity, meaning it cannot be …

    HOW DOES THE JUDGMENT FUND OPERATE TODAY?

    BY DEFINITION, IT REQUIRES NO FURTHER CONGRESSIONAL ACTION AND DOES NOT EXPIRE AT THE CLOSE OF ANY FISCAL YEAR.

    THE APPROPRIATION MAKES AN “UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF FUNDS” AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    NEGOTIATED AND AGREED TO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

    PAY FOR JUDGMENTS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES FROM STATE AND FOREIGN TRIBUNALS SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

     IT IS ONLY ACCESSIBLE WHEN THE UNITED STATES HAS WAIVED ITS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

    —————————————————————————-

    JUL 14, 2016  RE: THE JUDGMENT FUND (click on the link)

    Senators Fischer and Lankford Introduce Bill to Expose Taxpayer Funds Transferred to Iran

    Legislation Will Allow Americans to Track Payments to Foreign Nations

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – This morning, U.S. Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) introduced legislation to track taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations and prevent harmful transactions from happening in the future. The bill, known as the

    JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY AND TERRORISM FINANCING PREVENTION ACT,

     expands upon legislation that Senator Fischer introduced last year with Senator Cory Gardner (R-Colo.). It would require a public accounting of the taxpayer funds that are distributed out of the Judgment Fund.

    Senator Fischer released the following statement:

    “Hardworking American families have every right to see exactly how their tax dollars are being spent, especially when used to fund hostile enemies of the United States. That is why I’m proud to join Senator Lankford to offer a new version of the Judgment Fund Transparency Act, which includes greater oversight of taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations. More transparency leads to greater accountability and through this bill, we can hold our government to task for their actions. We should not be in the business of providing funds to state sponsors of terrorism.”

    Senator Lankford released the following statement:

    “One year after the Iran Nuclear agreement, we still have the same concerns with Iran as before. Their secrecy is disconcerting and they continue to be spread terrorism and a radical Islamist ideology around the region. President Obama’s billion-dollar payment to Iran in January, which we now know is funding Iran’s military expansion, is an appalling example of Executive Branch governance.

    “The bill Senator Fischer and I have introduced will provide the American public with necessary details of this dangerous billion-dollar payment and ensure that no taxpayer dollars are ever again used to fund the extremist and violent ambitions of rogue nations like Iran.  Subsidizing Iran’s military is perhaps the worst use of taxpayer dollars ever by an American president.”

    —————————————————————————————-

    Hague Claims Tribunal Settlement – US Department of State

    www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2016/…/251338.ht…

    United States Department of State Jan 17, 2016 – The United States and Iran today have settled a long outstanding claim at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in the Hague. This specific claim was in …

    IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLOSED $400 MILLION CASH HAGUE SETTLEMENT WITH IRAN,

    UPDATED ON SEP 7, 2016 TO $1.7 BILLION IN CASH HAGUE SETTLEMENT WITH IRAN

    US made $1.7 billion transfer to Iran in foreign cash, Treasury says …

    www.foxnews.com/…/us-made-1-7-billion-transfer-to-iran-in-foreign…

    Fox News Channel Sep 7, 2016 – A Treasury spokeswoman told the Associated Press the cash payments …. @cntstdthepain – Iran was seeking $10 billion in today’s dollars.

    ———————————————————————–

    YEP…. AND, IN ADDITION TO THAT

    WE HAVE “U.S. FOREIGN AID FUNDING” FOR HUMANITARIAN AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE.

    “Hardworking American families have every right to see exactly how their tax dollars are being spent, especially when used to fund hostile enemies of the United States.

    WHO IS GOING TO. INTRODUCED LEGISLATION TO TRACK DANGEROUS BILLION-DOLLAR  TAXPAYER-FUNDED FOREIGN AID PAYMENTS TO FOREIGN NATIONS AND PREVENT HARMFUL U.S. FOREIGN AID FUNDING OF HUMANITARIAN AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE FROM ENDING UP IN THE HANDS OF STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM.

     That is why I’m proud to join (PRESIDENT TRUMP)  to offer a new version of the

     FOREIGN AID FUND TRANSPARENCY AND TERRORISM FINANCING PREVENTION ACT  

    which includes greater oversight of taxpayer-funded payments to foreign nations. More transparency leads to greater accountability and through this bill, we can hold our government to task for their actions. We should not be in the business of providing funds to state sponsors of terrorism.”

    ——————————————————————————

    HOW DOES THE FOREIGN AID FUNDING OPERATE TODAY?

     U.S. FOREIGN (AID) RELATIONS AND AFFAIRS, SENATE AND HOUSE FUNDING FOREIGN AID PROGRAMS AS WELL AS FUNDING ARMS SALES AND TRAINING FOR NATIONAL ALLIES?.

     THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS is a standing committee of the … THE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE IS GENERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING (BUT NOT ADMINISTERING) and funding foreign aid programs as well as funding arms sales and training for national allies.

     GENERALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING?

    ————————————————————————

    THE U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS is a standing committee of the …has jurisdiction over BILLS AND INVESTIGATIONS related to the foreign affairs of the United States.

     BILLS AND INVESTIGATIONS?

    —————————————————————-

     INVESTIGATION ON WHO DELIVERS?

    Delivery of Foreign Assistance

    What Executive Branch Agencies Implement Foreign Aid

    Programs?

    U.S. Agency for International Development

    U.S. Department of Defense

    U.S. Department of State

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

    U.S. Department of the Treasury

    MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

    ——————————————————

    The Millennium Challenge Account

    http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/developingnations/millennium.html

    This is historical material, “frozen in time.” The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.

    March 14, 2002 “Today, I call for a new compact for global development, defined by new ACCOUNTABILITY for both rich and poor nations alike,” STATES PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS ADDRESS AT THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK IN WASHINGTON, D.C. MARCH 14, 2002. Accompanying the President: the lead singer of U2, Bono; Cardinal McCarrick and WORLDBANK PRESIDENT JIM WOLFENSOHN.

    —————————————————————

    INVESTIGATION ON WHO DELIVERS?

    WHO ENSURES ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MEASURABLE RESULTS?

    MCC IS AN INDEPENDENT U.S. GOVERNMENT FOREIGN AID AGENCY

    PROVIDES ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE THROUGH A COMPETITIVE SELECTION PROCESS TO DEVELOPING NATIONS …

    ADMINISTRATION  THE MCA WILL BE ADMINISTERED BY A NEW GOVERNMENT CORPORATION DESIGNED TO SUPPORT INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES

    AND TO ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR MEASURABLE RESULTS.

    THE CORPORATION WILL BE SUPERVISED BY A BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPOSED OF CABINET LEVEL OFFICIALS.

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE WILL BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. (JOHN KERRY)

    THE CEO OF THE MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION WILL BE NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT (OBAMA) AND CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE.

    The following 16 indicators (WITH SOURCES), CHOSEN because of the relative quality and objectivity of their data, country coverage, public availability, and correlation with growth and poverty reduction, WILL BE USED TO ASSESS NATIONAL PERFORMANCE RELATIVE TO GOVERNING JUSTLY, INVESTING IN PEOPLE, and encouraging economic freedom.

    GOVERNING JUSTLY:

    CIVIL LIBERTIES (FREEDOM HOUSE)

    POLITICAL RIGHTS (FREEDOM HOUSE)

    VOICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    RULE OF LAW (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    CONTROL OF CORRUPTION (WORLD BANK INSTITUTE)

    Investing in People:

    Public Primary Education Spending as Percent of GDP (World Bank/national sources)

    Primary Education Completion Rate (World Bank/national sources)

    Public Expenditures on Health as Percent of GDP (World Bank/national sources)

    Immunization Rates: DPT and Measles (World Bank/UN/national sources)

    ————————————————————————-

    Just asking is MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION an independent regulatory agency, as defined below?

    UNLIKE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES, independent regulatory agencies are not subject to basic analytical requirements. BECAUSE OF THIS, INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES DO NOT CONDUCT RIGOROUS COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OR CUMULATIVE EFFECT EVALUATION.

    And? Other agencies?

    ——————————————————-

    What Are the Different Forms in Which Assistance Is Provided?

    Cash Transfers

    Equipment and Commodities

    Economic Infrastructure

    Training

    Expertise

    Small Grants

    ———————————————————————————–

    The Judgment Fund, which is administered by the Treasury Department, is used to pay for certain court judgments and settlements against the federal government. Between 2013 and 2015, the federal government paid more than $10 billion in Judgment Fund awards with scant transparency or oversight.

    This fund has continued to come under increased scrutiny, as it is allowed to allocate unlimited funds to cover government liability in lawsuits and is not subject to the annual appropriations process. The Judgement Fund Transparency Act would provide hardworking taxpayers and members of Congress the ability to see exactly how tax dollars are being spent on these litigation expenses.

    In February of 2015, The Washington Examiner published an editorial praising Senator Fischer’s bill:

    “Senators Cory Gardner, R-Colo., and Deb Fischer, R-Neb., are co-sponsoring a bill that would fix this problem and bring transparency to the Judgment Fund, the treasury account that pays judgments and settlements to plaintiffs. The Judgment Fund Transparency Act is just two pages long. It simply requires the Treasury Department to make public through its website the details of every payment the fund makes… The bill deserves broad bipartisan support. For anyone who believes in government transparency, it’s a no-brainer.”

    Click here to view text of the bill.

    Permalink: http://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2016/7/senators-fischer-and-lankford-introduce-bill-to-expose-taxpayer-funds-transferred-to-iran


  • Trump’s Debate Survey Optional

     Trump’s Debate Survey Optional

     Sept 15, 2015

    To prepare for the BIGGEST night of our campaign, I’m turning to the very people who have humbled me and gotten me to where I am today… YOU.

    As your champion, I need to know what you want me to fight for on that stage. I want you to be confident that I defend the issues you care about. I want to make you proud, Pearl Rains.

    Which is why I’m asking you to take the TRUMP Debate Preparation Survey now. >> 

    Oops… I provided too much OPTIONAL  feedback. My comments timed out.

     I clipped and snipped and submitted.

    ——————————————————————-

    HOWEVER… I do have the option of posting my expanded optional points on my website.

    Debatable Issues?

    ——————————————————————–

    WHAT’S MISSING?

    #2 Building the wall to protect America against the heroin epidemic,

    Feb 23, 2016 – The opioid epidemic has been called the worst drug crisis in American history.

    Mexican cartels, have grown their share of the heroin market tremendously in recent years. Together, Mexican drug traffickers smuggled nearly a quarter-million pounds of heroin into the US in 2014, according to The Washington Post.

    Ohio has the highest heroin overdose death rate, while New York ranked 19th in the nation in 2014 among the 43 states for which data were available.

    Build  the Wall stop the heroin

    —————————————————————————–

    #4 Lying, extremely careless, grossly generalistic, deleting 30,000 emails

    —————————————————–

    #14 Bad judgment of the establishment Hillary Clinton and John Kerry voted for the Iraq war resolution Colin Powell’s lying’ to the UN Security Council was “the game changer” that started 16 years of horrific wars and conflict and completely destabilizing and destroying the middle east

    ———————————————————–

    #15 Public Corruption  The study calculated that government corruption costs American taxpayers tens of billions of dollars a year. The 10 most corrupt states listed in the study, in order, are Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Alabama, Alaska, South Dakota, Kentucky and Florida. The Justice Department defines public corruption as “crimes involving abuses of the public trust by government officials,” including crimes ranging from bribery, extortion and vote-buying to obstruction of justice, money laundering and fraud.

    ————————————————————

    #17 Indeed, America, from a republic to a democracy, to socialism, to Agenda 21 globalization, to Bush’s New World Order under the United Nations control.

    ————————————————————————-

    #20 The Art of War

    What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations

    WE HAVE HEARD OF STUPID HASTE IN WAR, (IRAN)

    CLEVERNESS HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN ASSOCIATED WITH LONG DELAYS. 

    THERE IS NO INSTANCE OF A COUNTRY HAVING BENEFITED FROM PROLONGED WARFARE.

    Now, when your weapons are dulled, your ardor damped, your strength exhausted and your treasure spent, other chieftains will spring up to take advantage of your extremity. Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue.

    ———————————————————————————-

    #21 HOW THE DEMOCRATS DESTROYED DETROIT  March 3, 2013  DETROIT — where the population is 82.7 percent black, is a city on the brink of ruination. At the center of that ruination IS 50 YEARS OF DEMOCRAT RULE. Detroit’s downward spiral has been legendary. Once the fourth largest city in the nation, and home to its largest industry, Detroit’s population has been cut in half, from 1.5 million in 1970, to less than 700,000 in 2012. Median household income is $27,862 compared to the state median of $48,669. The poverty level is 36.2 percent compared to a statewide level of 15.7. The murder rate is 11 times that of New York City, and the unemployment rate is above 18 percent, more than double the national average.

    Jan 24, 2016 According to the letter, Kilpatrick said he knew about the issues with the Flint water system back in 2004, despite the city being with the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department until 2014.

    ——————————————————————

    #26 Trump should focus on what THE CLINTON’S HAVE ACTUALLY DONE FOR THE CLINTON’S IN 30 YEARS. THEIR RAGS TO RICHES STORY Clintons ‘dead broke’ after White House? Actually, they earned over … REVEALED: New Pay-For-Play Details Of Clinton Corruption » Alex …

    ——————————————————————-

    #27

    Still Report #881 – How Trump Fixed the NYC Skating Rink – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsP89haGyoI
    May 18, 2016 – Uploaded by Bill Still

    To become a Partner : www.billstill.com, then Click “Subscribe”. To make a one-time donation: http://bit.ly …

     

    ————————————————————————–

    #28 GOP CANDIDATE OTHER THAN THE ESTABLISHMENT

    ———————————————————-

    #30 PLEASE USE YOUR SENSE OF HUMOR

    WE THE DEPLORABLE’S MUST HAVE A PRESIDENT THAT INCITES LAUGHTER

     


  • Trump’s Art Of the Deal 1986

    How do you explain this story?

    Thirty years ago everything was infected by politics. People just wanted a skating rink by December. (Trump was a businessman of action, success and integrity and he just did it)

    The city of New York had spent six years and $13 million failing to build an ice skating rink in Central Park.  Donald Trump proposed to Mayor Ed Koch that he take over the project for $3 million and promised to cover any excess amounts himself rather than go back to the city.

    By late October the project was finished and was three quarters of a million dollars under budget.

    How do you explain this story? Why was the city of New York so inept that it could not do in six years and with five times the money what Donald Trump was able to achieve in a few months?

    Thirty years ago everything was infected by politics.  (Trump was a businessman of action, success and integrity and he just did it)

    ———————————————————–

    Donald Trump, Ed Koch, and the Ice Skating Rink: A Tale of Bureaucracy

    blog.acton.org/…/49418-donald-trump-ed-koch-and-the-ice-skatingri
    Acton Institute
    Feb 6, 2013 – The city of New York had spent six years and $13 million failing to build an ice skating rink in Central Park. In early summer that year, Donald …

    ————————————————————–

    As President how will Trump fix the United States Of America?

    Still Report #881 – How Trump Fixed the NYC Skating Rink – YouTube

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsP89haGyoI
    May 18, 2016 – Uploaded by Bill Still

    Still Report #881 – How Trump Fixed the NYC Skating Rink … and 13 million dollars trying to fix Central Park

    ————————————————————————–
     Wednesday, February 6, 2013
    By

    James Q. Wilson’s terrific book Bureaucracy has an interesting story about Donald Trump and New York mayor Ed Koch. The year was 1986. The city of New York had spent six years and $13 million failing to build an ice skating rink in Central Park. In early summer that year, Donald Trump proposed to Mayor Ed Koch that he take over the project for $3 million and promised to cover any excess amounts himself rather than go back to the city. By late October the project was finished and was three quarters of a million dollars under budget.

    How do you explain this story? Why was the city of New York so inept that it could not do in six years and with five times the money what Donald Trump was able to achieve in a few months?

    There are several reasons why the city failed so miserably, but ultimately, the answer is that when government tries to do something, everything is infected by politics. For example, when the city planned to build the rink, the type of fuel used for refrigeration was a political matter. When Trump built the rink, he only worried about getting a reliable refrigeration unit. The city also had to abide by standards for equitable bidding of the project. Trump only had to give the contract to someone he knew could get the job done. Most important, when the city had the project there wasn’t much incentive to contain cost. No member of the government would personally have to cover cost overruns. Trump, on the other hand, accepted responsibility for coming in at or under the budget as the only way he could come out ahead.

    As we continue to expand our government, we need to be thinking about what we really want. Bureaucracy gives us all kinds of things that we emphasize in our politics such as politically correct energy, equity and diversity in bidding, protection of union members, and providing jobs for government workers. On the other hand, sometimes you just want your skating rink by December.

    ————————————————————-

     

    THIRTY YEARS LATER, EVERYTHING IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS STILL RIGGED AND INFECTED BY CROOKED, LYING’, CORRUPT, GREEDY, SELF SERVING,  ESTABLISHMENT COMPLACENT CAREER POLITICIANS AND A BLOATED  BUREAUCRACY

    WE THE PEOPLE SHALL NO LONGER BE SILENT AND WITH THE STAGNANT “STATUS QUO”

    WE WANT AMERICA TO BE GREAT AGAIN.

    2016 IS THE YEAR WE THE PEOPLE SHALL VOTE AND ELECT DONALD J. TRUMP  AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    INDEED, TRUMP HAS BEEN A MAN OF ACTION, SUCCESS AND INTEGRITY FOR THIRTY YEARS.

    AS PRESIDENT  TRUMP’S ACTIONS, HONESTY, INTEGRITY  WILL MAKE AMERICA A SUCCESS. OUR NATION SHALL ONCE AGAIN  HAVE  THE LEADERSHIP REQUIRED FOR A  CONSTITUTIONAL TRUSTWORTHY GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE.

    IN 2016  WE  CAN GET WHAT WE WANT

    VOTE FOR TRUMP AND MAKE AMERICA AGAIN


  • Colin Powell’s Leaked Email’s

    Colin Powell’s Leaked Email’s

    Those leaked Colin Powell emails are a huge blow to Clinton (not …

    www.cnbc.com/…/those-leaked-colinpowellemails-are-a-huge-blow-to-clinton…

    CNBC 4 hours ago – Leaked Colin Powell emails reveal Clinton’s apparent disdain for Obama. … Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama in Beijing, China in 2009. … Far more damaging are the emails where Powell discusses Clinton, her email scandal, her health, and her apparent …

    —————————————————————————————-

    More than a decade ago, Colin Powell played a starring role in a recurring type of political dramaturgy. Scripts vary, while similar dramas play out on a variety of scales.

    Secretary of State Colin Powell spoke to the U.N. Security Council on February 5, 2003

    HOW EASILY TRUTH BECOMES IRRELEVANT IN THE PROCESS OF GOING TO WAR.

    ————————————————-

    Lie After Lie After Lie: What Colin Powell Knew Ten … – Huffington Post

    www.huffingtonpost.com/…/colin-powell-wmd-iraq-war_b_2624…

    The Huffington Post

    Feb 5, 2013 – Colin Powell made his Iraq presentation at the United Nations ten years ago … Powell’s speech can be found on the archived State Department …

    Indeed, More than a decade ago, Colin Powell played a starring role in a recurring type of political dramaturgy. Scripts vary, while similar dramas play out on a variety of scales. Behind a gauzy curtain, top officials engage in decision-making on war that gives democracy short shrift. For the public, crucial information that bears on the wisdom of warfare remains opaque or out of sight.

    Snippet

    THE NEW SECRETARY OF STATE, JOHN KERRY (D)  

    LIKE THE ONE HE JUST REPLACED, HILLARY CLINTON (D)  

    VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION  IN THE SENATE,

    NEARLY FOUR MONTHS BEFORE POWELL WENT TO THE U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL..

    The invasion began six weeks after Powell’s tour de force at the United Nations.

    ——————————————————-

    Feb 4, 2013 full unedited text

    Ten Years After Powell’s U.N. Speech, Old Hands Are Ready for More …

    www.normansolomon.com/…/tenyearsafterpowellsunspeecholdhands-are-ready

    Feb 4, 2013 – Ten Years After Powell’s U.N. Speech, Old Hands Are Ready for More Blood … The Washington Post was more war-crazed, headlining its editorial “Irrefutable” and declaring that after …. They’re old hands, dripping with blood.

    By Norman Solomon

    When Secretary of State Colin Powell spoke to the U.N. Security Council on February 5, 2003, countless journalists in the United States extolled him for a masterful performance — making the case that Saddam Hussein’s Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

    THE FACT THAT THE SPEECH LATER BECAME NOTORIOUS SHOULD NOT OBSCURE HOW EASILY TRUTH BECOMES IRRELEVANT IN THE PROCESS OF GOING TO WAR.

    Ten years later — with Powell’s speech a historic testament of shameless deception leading to vast carnage — we may not remember the extent of the fervent accolades. At the time, fawning praise was profuse across the USA’s mainline media spectrum, including the nation’s reputedly great newspapers.

    The New York Times editorialized that Powell “was all the more convincing because he dispensed with apocalyptic invocations of a struggle of good and evil and focused on shaping a sober, factual case against Mr. Hussein’s regime.” The Washington Post was more war-crazed, headlining its editorial “Irrefutable” and declaring that after Powell’s U.N. presentation “it is hard to imagine how anyone could doubt that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction.”

    Yet basic flaws in Powell’s U.N. speech were abundant. Slanted translations of phone intercepts rendered them sinister. Interpretations of unclear surveillance photos stretched to concoct the worst. Summaries of cherry-picked intelligence detoured around evidence that Iraq no longer had WMDs. Ballyhooed documents about an Iraqi quest for uranium were forgeries.

    Assumptions about U.S. prerogatives also went largely unquestioned. In response to Powell’s warning that the U.N. Security Council would place itself “in danger of irrelevance” by failing to endorse a U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, the adulation from U.S. media embraced the notion that the United Nations could only be “relevant” by bending to Washington’s wishes. A combination of cooked intelligence and geopolitical arrogance, served up to rapturous reviews at home, set the stage for what was to come.

    The invasion began six weeks after Powell’s tour de force at the United Nations. Soon, a search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was in full swing. None turned up. In January 2004 — 11 months after Powell’s U.N. speech — the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace released a report concluding that top officials in the Bush administration “systematically misrepresented the threat from Iraq’s WMD and ballistic missile programs.”

    Left twisting in the wind was Powell’s speech to the U.N. Security Council, where he’d issued a “conservative estimate” that Iraq “has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent.” The secretary of state had declared: “There can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more.”

    Nineteen months after the speech, in mid-September 2004, Powell made a terse public acknowledgment. “I think it’s unlikely that we will find any stockpiles,” he said. But no gingerly climb-down could mitigate the bloodshed that continued in Iraq.

    A decade ago, Colin Powell played a starring role in a recurring type of political dramaturgy. Scripts vary, while similar dramas play out on a variety of scales. Behind a gauzy curtain, top officials engage in decision-making on war that gives democracy short shrift. For the public, crucial information that bears on the wisdom of warfare remains opaque or out of sight.

    Among the powerful and not-so-powerful, in mass media and on Capitol Hill, the default position is still to defer to presidential momentum for war. Public candor and policy introspection remain in short supply.

    The new secretary of state, John Kerry — like the one he just replaced, Hillary Clinton — voted for the Iraq war resolution in the Senate, nearly four months before Powell went to the U.N. Security Council. During the crucial lead-up months, Senator Kerry was at pains to show his avid support for an invasion. In early October 2002, appearing for an hour on MSNBC’s “Hardball” program live from The Citadel as an audience of young cadets filled the screen, Kerry said: “I’m prepared to go. I think people understand that Saddam Hussein is a danger.”

    Since then, Kerry has publicly said that he would have voted for the war resolution even if he’d known that Iraq actually had no weapons of mass destruction. But on the Senate floor, Kerry prefaced his vote for war by rhetorically demanding to know why Saddam Hussein was “attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don’t even try.” The senator emphasized that “according to intelligence, Iraq has chemical and biological weapons.”

    Months later, when Powell trumpeted that theme at the United Nations, the landslide of testimonials included this one from a future U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice: “I think he has proved that Iraq has these weapons and is hiding them, and I don’t think many informed people doubted that.”

    Meanwhile, the Washington Post edition with the editorial headlined “Irrefutable” also included unanimous agreement from each of the opinion columns on the facing page.

    Longtime Post columnist Richard Cohen attested to Powell’s unquestionable veracity with these words: “The evidence he presented to the United Nations — some of it circumstantial, some of it absolutely bone-chilling in its detail — had to prove to anyone that Iraq not only hasn’t accounted for its weapons of mass destruction but without a doubt still retains them. Only a fool — or possibly a Frenchman – could conclude otherwise.”

    Inches away, another venerable pundit held forth. Powell managed to “present the world with a convincing and detailed X-ray of Iraq’s secret weapons and terrorism programs yesterday,” wrote Jim Hoagland, a Post foreign-policy specialist. He concluded: “To continue to say that the Bush administration has not made its case, you must now believe that Colin Powell lied in the most serious statement he will ever make, or was taken in by manufactured evidence. I don’t believe that. Today, neither should you.”

    Fast forward to the current era. What are Richard Cohen and Jim Hoagland writing — about Iran?

    On February 6, 2012, exactly nine years after proclaiming that “only a fool” could doubt Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, Cohen’s column declared flatly: “The ultimate remedy is Iranian regime change.” Four months ago, Cohen wrapped up a column by observing “there is still time for Iran to back down before President Obama’s red line — no nuclear weapon — is crossed. This is a war whose time has not yet come.” Not yet.

    Hoagland — a decade after telling readers they should put their trust in Colin Powell’s “convincing and detailed X-ray of Iraq’s secret weapons” — is now making clear that his patience with Iran is wearing thin. “Until recently,” Hoagland wrote five weeks ago, “I had been relatively comfortable with Obama’s assertions that there is time to reach a peaceful resolution with Iran.” Hoagland’s column went on to say that military strikes on Iran “threaten disastrous political and economic consequences for the world,” so diplomatic efforts should try to avert the need for such strikes — before they become necessary.

    So goes the dominant spectrum of opinionating and policymaking for war, from eagerness to reluctance. Propaganda lead-ups to warfare are as varied as wars themselves; and yet every style of such propaganda relies on deception, and every war is unspeakable horror.

    After jumping onto ghastly bandwagons for one war after another, the nation’s media establishment is available to do it again. So is the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. So is the new secretary of state. They’re old hands, dripping with blood. They have not had enough.

    ____________________________________

    Norman Solomon is the author of “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” He is the founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy and co-founder of RootsAction.org.

    February 04, 2013 | Permalink

    I AM PROUD TO BE ONE OF TRUMP’S DEPLORABLE SENIOR SET


  • Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Addressing Bush’s “New World” Dis-Order

    Why American Citizens are VOTING FOR TRUMP and dumping the establishments politicians right and left.

    Full unedited  text

    9/11, 1990 President George H. W. Bush’s  New World Order Address

    Address Before a Joint Session of Congress (September 11, 1990 …

    millercenter.org/president/bush/speeches/speech-3425

    Transcript

    Mr. President and Mr. Speaker and Members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, fellow Americans, thank you very much for that warm welcome. We gather tonight, witness to events in the Persian Gulf as significant as they are tragic. In the early morning hours of August 2d, following negotiations and promises by Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein not to use force, a powerful Iraqi army invaded its trusting and much weaker neighbor, Kuwait. Within 3 days, 120,000 Iraqi troops with 850 tanks had poured into Kuwait and moved south to threaten Saudi Arabia. IT WAS THEN THAT I DECIDED TO ACT TO CHECK THAT AGGRESSION.
    At this moment, our brave servicemen and women stand watch in that distant desert and on distant seas, side by side with the forces of more than 20 other nations. They are some of the finest men and women of the United States of America. And they’re doing one terrific job. These valiant Americans were ready at a moment’s notice to leave their spouses and their children, to serve on the front line halfway around the world. They remind us who keeps America strong: they do. In the trying circumstances of the Gulf, the morale of our service men and women is excellent. In the face of danger, they’re brave, they’re well-trained, and dedicated.
    A soldier, Private First Class Wade Merritt of Knoxville, Tennessee, now stationed in Saudi Arabia, wrote his parents of his worries, his love of family, and his hope for peace. But Wade also wrote, “I am proud of my country and its firm stance against inhumane aggression. I am proud of my army and its men. I am proud to serve my country.” Well, let me just say, Wade, America is proud of you and is grateful to every soldier, sailor, marine, and airman serving the cause of peace in the Persian Gulf. I also want to thank the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Powell; the Chiefs here tonight; our commander in the Persian Gulf, General Schwartzkopf; and the men and women of the Department of Defense. What a magnificent job you all are doing. And thank you very, very much from a grateful people. I wish I could say that their work is done. But we all know it’s not.
    So, if there ever was a time to put country before self and patriotism before party, the time is now. And let me thank all Americans, especially those here in this Chamber tonight, for your support for our armed forces and for their mission. That support will be even more important in the days to come. So, tonight I want to talk to you about what’s at stake—what we must do together to defend civilized values around the world and maintain our economic strength at home.
    Our objectives in the Persian Gulf are clear, our goals defined and familiar: Iraq must withdraw from Kuwait completely, immediately, and without condition. Kuwait’s legitimate government must be restored. The security and stability of the Persian Gulf must be assured. And American citizens abroad must be protected. These goals are not ours alone. They’ve been endorsed by the United Nations Security Council five times in as many weeks. Most countries share our concern for principle. And many have a stake in the stability of the Persian Gulf. This is not, as Saddam Hussein would have it, the United States against Iraq. It is Iraq against the world.
    As you know, I’ve just returned from a very productive meeting with Soviet President Gorbachev. And I am pleased that we are working together to build a new relationship. In Helsinki, our joint statement affirmed to the world our shared resolve to counter Iraq’s threat to peace. Let me quote: “We are united in the belief that Iraq’s aggression must not be tolerated. No peaceful international order is possible if larger states can devour their smaller neighbors.” Clearly, no longer can a dictator count on East-West confrontation to stymie concerted United Nations action against aggression. A new partnership of nations has begun.
    We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge: a new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.
    The test we face is great, and so are the stakes. This is the first assault on the new world that we seek, the first test of our mettle. Had we not responded to this first provocation with clarity of purpose, if we do not continue to demonstrate our determination, it would be a signal to actual and potential despots around the world. America and the world must defend common vital interests—and we will. America and the world must support the rule of law—and we will. America and the world must stand up to aggression—and we will. And one thing more: In the pursuit of these goals America will not be intimidated.
    Vital issues of principle are at stake. Saddam Hussein is literally trying to wipe a country off the face of the Earth. We do not exaggerate. Nor do we exaggerate when we say Saddam Hussein will fail. Vital economic interests are at risk as well. Iraq itself controls some 10 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves. Iraq plus Kuwait controls twice that. An Iraq permitted to swallow Kuwait would have the economic and military power, as well as the arrogance, to intimidate and coerce its neighbors—neighbors who control the lion’s share of the world’s remaining oil reserves. We cannot permit a resource so vital to be dominated by one so ruthless. And we won’t.
    Recent events have surely proven that there is no substitute for American leadership. In the face of tyranny, let no one doubt American credibility and reliability. Let no one doubt our staying power. We will stand by our friends. One way or another, the leader of Iraq must learn this fundamental truth. From the outset, acting hand in hand with others, we’ve sought to fashion the broadest possible international response to Iraq’s aggression. The level of world cooperation and condemnation of Iraq is unprecedented. Armed forces from countries spanning four continents are there at the request of King Fahd of Saudi Arabia to deter and, if need be, to defend against attack. Moslems and non-Moslems, Arabs and non-Arabs, soldiers from many nations stand shoulder to shoulder, resolute against Saddam Hussein’s ambitions.
    We can now point to five United Nations Security Council resolutions that condemn Iraq’s aggression. They call for Iraq’s immediate and unconditional withdrawal, the restoration of Kuwait’s legitimate government, and categorically reject Iraq’s cynical and self-serving attempt to annex Kuwait. Finally, the United Nations has demanded the release of all foreign nationals held hostage against their will and in contravention of international law. It is a mockery of human decency to call these people “guests.” They are hostages, and the whole world knows it.
    Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a dependable ally, said it all: “We do not bargain over hostages. We will not stoop to the level of using human beings as bargaining chips ever.” Of course, of course, our hearts go out to the hostages and to their families. But our policy cannot change, and it will not change. America and the world will not be blackmailed by this ruthless policy.
    We’re now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders. We owe much to the outstanding leadership of Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar. The United Nations is backing up its words with action. The Security Council has imposed mandatory economic sanctions on Iraq, designed to force Iraq to relinquish the spoils of its illegal conquest. The Security Council has also taken the decisive step of authorizing the use of all means necessary to ensure compliance with these sanctions. Together with our friends and allies, ships of the United States Navy are today patrolling Mideast waters. They’ve already intercepted more than 700 ships to enforce the sanctions. Three regional leaders I spoke with just yesterday told me that these sanctions are working. Iraq is feeling the heat. We continue to hope that Iraq’s leaders will recalculate just what their aggression has cost them. They are cut off from world trade, unable to sell their oil. And only a tiny fraction of goods gets through.
    The communique with President Gorbachev made mention of what happens when the embargo is so effective that children of Iraq literally need milk or the sick truly need medicine. Then, under strict international supervision that guarantees the proper destination, then food will be permitted.
    At home, the material cost of our leadership can be steep. That’s why Secretary of State Baker and Treasury Secretary Brady have met with many world leaders to underscore that the burden of this collective effort must be shared. We are prepared to do our share and more to help carry that load; we insist that others do their share as well.
    The response of most of our friends and allies has been good. To help defray costs, the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE—the United Arab Emirates—have pledged to provide our deployed troops with all the food and fuel they need. Generous assistance will also be provided to stalwart front-line nations, such as Turkey and Egypt. I am also heartened to report that this international response extends to the neediest victims of this conflict—those refugees. For our part, we’ve contributed $28 million for relief efforts. This is but a portion of what is needed. I commend, in particular, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and several European nations who have joined us in this purely humanitarian effort.
    There’s an energy-related cost to be borne as well. Oil-producing nations are already replacing lost Iraqi and Kuwaiti output. More than half of what was lost has been made up. And we’re getting superb cooperation. If producers, including the United States, continue steps to expand oil and gas production, we can stabilize prices and guarantee against hardship. Additionally, we and several of our allies always have the option to extract oil from our strategic petroleum reserves if conditions warrant. As I’ve pointed out before, conservation efforts are essential to keep our energy needs as low as possible. And we must then take advantage of our energy sources across the board: coal, natural gas, hydro, and nuclear. Our failure to do these things has made us more dependent on foreign oil than ever before. Finally, let no one even contemplate profiteering from this crisis. We will not have it.
    I cannot predict just how long it will take to convince Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait. Sanctions will take time to have their full intended effect. We will continue to review all options with our allies, but let it be clear: we will not let this aggression stand.
    Our interest, our involvement in the Gulf is not transitory. It predated Saddam Hussein’s aggression and will survive it. Long after all our troops come home—and we all hope it’s soon, very soon—there will be a lasting role for the United States in assisting the nations of the Persian Gulf. Our role then: to deter future aggression. Our role is to help our friends in their own self-defense. And something else: to curb the proliferation of chemical, biological, ballistic missile and, above all, nuclear technologies.
    Let me also make clear that the United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people. Our quarrel is with Iraq’s dictator and with his aggression. Iraq will not be permitted to annex Kuwait. That’s not a threat, that’s not a boast, that’s just the way it’s going to be.
    Our ability to function effectively as a great power abroad depends on how we conduct ourselves at home. Our economy, our Armed Forces, our energy dependence, and our cohesion all determine whether we can help our friends and stand up to our foes. For America to lead, America must remain strong and vital. Our world leadership and domestic strength are mutual and reinforcing; a woven piece, strongly bound as Old Glory. To revitalize our leadership, our leadership capacity, we must address our budget deficit—not after election day, or next year, but now.
    Higher oil prices slow our growth, and higher defense costs would only make our fiscal deficit problem worse. That deficit was already greater than it should have been—a projected $232 billion for the coming year. It must—it will—be reduced.
    To my friends in Congress, together we must act this very month—before the next fiscal year begins on October 1st—to get America’s economic house in order. The Gulf situation helps us realize we are more economically vulnerable than we ever should be. Americans must never again enter any crisis, economic or military, with an excessive dependence on foreign oil and an excessive burden of Federal debt.
    Most Americans are sick and tired of endless battles in the Congress and between the branches over budget matters. It is high time we pulled together and get the job done right. It’s up to us to straighten this out. This job has four basic parts. First, the Congress should, this month, within a budget agreement, enact growth-oriented tax measures—to help avoid recession in the short term and to increase savings, investment, productivity, and competitiveness for the longer term. These measures include extending incentives for research and experimentation; expanding the use of IRA’s for new homeowners; establishing tax-deferred family savings accounts; creating incentives for the creation of enterprise zones and initiatives to encourage more domestic drilling; and, yes, reducing the tax rate on capital gains.
    And second, the Congress should, this month, enact a prudent multiyear defense program, one that reflects not only the improvement in East-West relations but our broader responsibilities to deal with the continuing risks of outlaw action and regional conflict. Even with our obligations in the Gulf, a sound defense budget can have some reduction in real terms; and we’re prepared to accept that. But to go beyond such levels, where cutting defense would threaten our vital margin of safety, is something I will never accept. The world is still dangerous. And surely, that is now clear. Stability’s not secure. American interests are far reaching. Interdependence has increased. The consequences of regional instability can be global. This is no time to risk America’s capacity to protect her vital interests.
    And third, the Congress should, this month, enact measures to increase domestic energy production and energy conservation in order to reduce dependence on foreign oil. These measures should include my proposals to increase incentives for domestic oil and gas exploration, fuel-switching, and to accelerate the development of the Alaskan energy resources without damage to wildlife. As you know, when the oil embargo was imposed in the early 1970’s, the United States imported almost 6 million barrels of oil a day. This year, before the Iraqi invasion, U.S. imports had risen to nearly 8 million barrels per day. And we’d moved in the wrong direction. And now we must act to correct that trend.
    And fourth, the Congress should, this month, enact a 5-year program to reduce the projected debt and deficits by $500 billion—that’s by half a trillion dollars. And if, with the Congress, we can develop a satisfactory program by the end of the month, we can avoid the ax of sequester—deep across-the-board cuts that would threaten our military capacity and risk substantial domestic disruption. I want to be able to tell the American people that we have truly solved the deficit problem. And for me to do that, a budget agreement must meet these tests: It must include the measures I’ve recommended to increase economic growth and reduce dependence on foreign oil. It must be fair. All should contribute, but the burden should not be excessive for any one group of programs or people. It must address the growth of government’s hidden liabilities. It must reform the budget process and, further, it must be real.
    I urge Congress to provide a comprehensive 5-year deficit reduction program to me as a complete legislative package, with measures to assure that it can be fully enforced. America is tired of phony deficit reduction or promise-now, save-later plans. It is time for a program that is credible and real. And finally, to the extent that the deficit reduction program includes new revenue measures, it must avoid any measure that would threaten economic growth or turn us back toward the days of punishing income tax rates. That is one path we should not head down again.
    I have been pleased with recent progress, although it has not always seemed so smooth. But now it’s time to produce. I hope we can work out a responsible plan. But with or without agreement from the budget summit, I ask both Houses of the Congress to allow a straight up-or-down vote on a complete $500-billion deficit reduction package not later than September 28. If the Congress cannot get me a budget, then Americans will have to face a tough, mandated sequester. I’m hopeful, in fact, I’m confident that the Congress will do what it should. And I can assure you that we in the executive branch will do our part.
    In the final analysis, our ability to meet our responsibilities abroad depends upon political will and consensus at home. This is never easy in democracies, for we govern only with the consent of the governed. And although free people in a free society are bound to have their differences, Americans traditionally come together in times of adversity and challenge.
    Once again, Americans have stepped forward to share a tearful goodbye with their families before leaving for a strange and distant shore. At this very moment, they serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That’s why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun. If they can come together under such adversity, if old adversaries like the Soviet Union and the United States can work in common cause, then surely we who are so fortunate to be in this great Chamber—Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives—can come together to fulfill our responsibilities here.
    Thank you. Good night. And God bless the United States of America.